Roles of H1 domains in determining higher order chromatin structure and H1 location

Peptides derived from calf thymus H1 and rat liver H1, comprising only the globular and COOH-terminal domains of the intact molecule and therefore lacking NH2-terminal domains, have been shown by reconstitution to be as effective as the complete H1 molecule in inducing higher-order-chromatin structure. As the globular domain of H1 alone cannot induce chromatin folding, our results demonstrate that this function is primarily controlled by the COOH-terminal domain of the molecule. Surprisingly, these peptides do not locate correctly with respect to the nucleosome. This is demonstrated by their failure to confer upon reconstitutes the ability to protect DNA fragments of chromatosome length when digested with micrococcal nuclease. The precise placement of the H1 molecule (globular domain) with respect to the nucleosome is shown to be influenced by the "tail" domains of both H1 and the core histones.     

CTCF elements direct allele-specific undermethylation at the imprinted H19 locus

The H19 imprinted gene locus is regulated by an upstream 2 kb imprinting control region (ICR) that influences allele-specific expression, DNA methylation, and replication timing. This ICR becomes de novo methylated during late spermatogenesis in the male but emerges from oogenesis in an unmethylated form, and this allele-specific pattern is then maintained throughout early development and in all tissues of the mouse. We have used a genetic approach involving transfection into embryonic stem (ES) cells in order to decipher how the maternal allele is protected from de novo methylation at the time of implantation. Our studies show that CCCTC binding factor (CTCF) boundary elements within the ICR have the ability to prevent de novo methylation on the maternal allele. Since CTCF does not recognize its binding sequence when methylated, this reaction does not occur on the paternal allele, thus preserving the gamete-derived, allele-specific pattern. These results suggest that CTCF may play a general role in the maintenance of differential methylation patterns in vivo.     

Histone H1 and chromatin higher order structure. Does histone H1 exhibit specific self-association?

1. Histones H1 and H5 in chromatin and in free solution can be cross-linked to higher multimers. Is this due to a specific protein/protein interaction? If so, this interaction might be the structural basis of the condensation of the chromosomal nucleofilament, known to be mediated by histones H1 and H5. 2. Since only the central domain of H1 and H5 exhibits tertiary folding and globular structure, this is the most likely site of specific interaction. 3. Formaldehyde has been used to test whether the central domains of histone H1 from calf thymus or from sea urchin sperm or histone H5 from chicken erythrocytes self-interact. 4. The cross-linking shown by each globular peptide was compared with that of its parent histone. 5. In all three cases the peptide cross-linked to a much lower extent than its intact parent histone and the observed cross-linked rates were roughly in proportion to the relative number of lysine residues parent histone and peptide. 6. It is concluded that there is no specific self-interaction between the globular domains of either H1 or H5 molecules in free solution. 7. This result suggests that specific H1/H1 protein/protein interactions are not the basic cause of chromatin condensation.     

Role of CTCF binding sites in the Igf2/H19 imprinting control region

A approximately 2.4-kb imprinting control region (ICR) regulates somatic monoallelic expression of the Igf2 and H19 genes. This is achieved through DNA methylation-dependent chromatin insulator and promoter silencing activities on the maternal and paternal chromosomes, respectively. In somatic cells, the hypomethylated maternally inherited ICR binds the insulator protein CTCF at four sites and blocks activity of the proximal Igf2 promoter by insulating it from its distal enhancers. CTCF binding is thought to play a direct role in inhibiting methylation of the ICR in female germ cells and in somatic cells and, therefore, in establishing and maintaining imprinting of the Igf2/H19 region. Here, we report on the effects of eliminating ICR CTCF binding by severely mutating all four sites in mice. We found that in the female and male germ lines, the mutant ICR remained hypomethylated and hypermethylated, respectively, showing that the CTCF binding sites are dispensable for imprinting establishment. Postfertilization, the maternal mutant ICR acquired methylation, which could be explained by loss of methylation inhibition, which is normally provided by CTCF binding. Adjacent regions in cis-the H19 promoter and gene-also acquired methylation, accompanied by downregulation of H19. This could be the result of a silencing effect of the methylated maternal ICR.     

Nuclear envelope-limited chromatin sheets (ELCS) and heterochromatin higher order structure

The interphase nucleus and nuclear envelope can acquire a myriad of shapes in normal or pathological cell states. There exist a wide variety of indentations and invaginations, of protrusions and evaginations. It has been difficult to classify and name all of these nuclear shapes and, consequently, a barrier to understanding the biochemical and biophysical causes. This review focuses upon one type of nuclear envelope shape change, named “nuclear envelope-limited chromatin sheets” (ELCS), which appears to involve exaggerated nuclear envelope growth, carrying with it one or more layers of ∼30 nm diameter heterochromatin. A hypothesis on the formation of ELCS is proposed, relating higher order heterochromatin structure in an interphase nucleus, nuclear envelope growth, and nuclear envelope-heterochromatin interactions.     

Changes in chromatin structure during the mitotic cycle

Summary Optical density profiles of Feulgen-stained nuclei ofBryonia dioica at different stages of the mitotic cycle were determined. Nuclei in the G₂ phase have a greater fraction of dense chromatin than nuclei in G₁ phase. However, nuclei at the end of the S phase have dispersed chromatin of minimal density. Thus, chromatin density oscillates during the mitotic cycle of this species, consequently the progressive increase in density previously recorded throughout the intermitotic period of two other species (onion and mouse) cannot be a general rule.     

A possible role of Drosophila CTCF in mitotic bookmarking and maintaining chromatin domains during the cell cycle

Background

The CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is a highly conserved insulator protein that plays various roles in many cellular processes. CTCF is one of the main architecture proteins in higher eukaryotes, and in combination with other architecture proteins and regulators, also shapes the three-dimensional organization of a genome. Experiments show CTCF partially remains associated with chromatin during mitosis. However, the role of CTCF in the maintenance and propagation of genome architectures throughout the cell cycle remains elusive.

Results

We performed a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis on public datasets of Drosophila CTCF (dCTCF). We characterized dCTCF-binding sites according to their occupancy status during the cell cycle, and identified three classes: interphase-mitosis-common (IM), interphase-only (IO) and mitosis-only (MO) sites. Integrated function analysis showed dCTCF-binding sites of different classes might be involved in different biological processes, and IM sites were more conserved and more intensely bound. dCTCF-binding sites of the same class preferentially localized closer to each other, and were highly enriched at chromatin syntenic and topologically associating domains boundaries.

Conclusions

Our results revealed different functions of dCTCF during the cell cycle and suggested that dCTCF might contribute to the establishment of the three-dimensional architecture of the Drosophila genome by maintaining local chromatin compartments throughout the whole cell cycle.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40659-015-0019-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Epigenetic regulation of Igf2/H19 imprinting at CTCF insulator binding sites

The mouse insulin-like growth factor II (Igf2) and H19 genes are located adjacent to each other on chromosome 7q11-13 and are reciprocally imprinted. It is believed that the allelic expression of these two genes is regulated by the binding of CTCF insulators to four parent-specific DNA methylation sites in an imprinting control center (ICR) located between these two genes. Although monoallelically expressed in peripheral tissues, Igf2 is biallelically transcribed in the CNS. In this study, we examined the allelic DNA methylation and CTCF binding in the Igf2/H19 imprinting center in CNS, hypothesizing that the aberrant CTCF binding as one of the mechanisms leads to biallelic expression of Igf2 in CNS. Using hybrid F1 mice (M. spretus males x C57BL/6 females), we showed that in CNS, CTCF binding sites in the ICR were methylated exclusively on the paternal allele, and CTCF bound only to the unmethylated maternal allele, showing no differences from the imprinted peripheral tissues. Among three other epigenetic modifications examined, histone H3 lysine 9 methylation correlated well with Igf2 allelic expression in CNS. These results suggest that CTCF binding to the ICR alone is not sufficient to insulate the Igf2 maternal promoter and to regulate the allelic expression of the gene in the CNS, thus challenging the aberrant CTCF binding as a common mechanism for lack of Igf2 imprinting in CNS. Further studies should be focused on the identification of factors that are involved in histone methylation and CTCF-associated factors that may be needed to coordinate Igf2 imprinting.     

Involvement of the globular domain of histone H1 in the higher order structures of chromatin

We have attacked H1-containing soluble chromatin by α-chymotrypsin under conditions where chromatin adopts different structures.Soluble rat liver chromatin fragments depleted of non-histone components were digested with α-chymotrypsin in NaCl concentrations between 0 mm and 500 mm. at pH 7, or at pH 10, or at pH 7 in the presence of 4 m-urea. α-Chymotrypsin cleaves purified rat liver histone H1 at a specific initial site (CT) located in the globular domain and produces an N-terminal half (CT-N) which contains most of the globular domain and the N-terminal tail, and a C-terminal half (CT-C) which contains the C-terminal tail and a small part of the globular domain. Since in sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis CT-C migrates between the core histones and H1, cleavage of chromatin-bound H1 by α-chymotrypsin can be easily monitored.The CT-C fragment was detected under conditions where chromatin fibers were unfolded or distorted: (1) under conditions of H1 dissociation at 400 mm and 500 mm-NaCl (pH 7 and 10); (2) at very low ionic strength where chromatin is unfolded into a filament with well-separated nucleosomes; (3) at pH 10 independent of the ionic strength where chromatin never assumes higher order structures; (4) in the presence of 4 m-urea (pH 7), again independent of the ionic strength. However, hardly any CT-C fragment was detected under conditions where fibers are observed in the electron microscope at pH 7 between 20 mm and 300 mm-NaCl. Under these conditions H1 is degraded by α-chymotrypsin into unstable fragments with a molecular weight higher than that of CT-C. Thus, the data show that there are at least two different modes of interaction of H1 in chromatin which correlate with the physical state of the chromatin.Since the condensation of chromatin into structurally organized fibers upon raising the ionic strength starts by internucleosomal contacts in the fiber axis (zig-zag-shaped fiber), where H1 appears to be localized, it is likely that in chromatin fibers the preferential cleavage site for α-chymotrypsin is protected because of H1-H1 contacts. The data suggest that the globular part of H1 is involved in these contacts close to the fiber axis. They appear to be hydrophobic and to be essential for the structural organization of the chromatin fibers. Based on the present and earlier observations we propose a model for H1 in which the globular domains eventually together with the N-terminal tails form a backbone in the fiber axis, and the nucleosomes are mainly attached to this polymer by the C-terminal tails.     

Non-random, individual-specific methylation profiles are present at the sixth CTCF binding site in the human H19/IGF2 imprinting control region

Expression of imprinted genes is classically associated with differential methylation of specific CpG-rich DNA regions (DMRs). The H19/IGF2 locus is considered a paradigm for epigenetic regulation. In mice, as in humans, the essential H19 DMR--target of the CTCF insulator--is located between the two genes. Here, we performed a pyrosequencing-based quantitative analysis of its CpG methylation in normal human tissues. The quantitative analysis of the methylation level in the H19 DMR revealed three unexpected discrete, individual-specific methylation states. This epigenetic polymorphism was confined to the sixth CTCF binding site while a unique median-methylated profile was found at the third CTCF binding site as well as in the H19 promoter. Monoallelic expression of H19 and IGF2 was maintained independently of the methylation status at the sixth CTCF binding site and the IGF2 DMR2 displayed a median-methylated profile in all individuals and tissues analyzed. Interestingly, the methylation profile was genetically transmitted. Transgenerational inheritance of the H19 methylation profile was compatible with a simple model involving one gene with three alleles. The existence of three individual-specific epigenotypes in the H19 DMR in a non-pathological situation means it is important to reconsider the diagnostic value and functional importance of the sixth CTCF binding site.     

Three-dimensional localization of CENP-A suggests a complex higher order structure of centromeric chromatin

The histone H3 variant centromere protein A (CENP-A) is central to centromere formation throughout eukaryotes. A long-standing question in centromere biology has been the organization of CENP-A at the centromere and its implications for the structure of centromeric chromatin. In this study, we describe the three-dimensional localization of CENP-A at the inner kinetochore plate through serial-section transmission electron microscopy of human mitotic chromosomes. At the kinetochores of normal centromeres and at a neocentromere, CENP-A occupies a compact domain at the inner kinetochore plate, stretching across two thirds of the length of the constriction but encompassing only one third of the constriction width and height. Within this domain, evidence of substructure is apparent. Combined with previous chromatin immunoprecipitation results (Saffery, R., H. Sumer, S. Hassan, L.H. Wong, J.M. Craig, K. Todokoro, M. Anderson, A. Stafford, and K.H.A. Choo. 2003. Mol. Cell. 12:509–516; Chueh, A.C., L.H. Wong, N. Wong, and K.H.A. Choo. 2005. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:85–93), our data suggest that centromeric chromatin is arranged in a coiled 30-nm fiber that is itself coiled or folded to form a higher order structure.     

A repeating unit of higher order chromatin structure in chick red blood cell nuclei

The organization of nucleosomes in higher order chromatin structures has been studied by electron microscopy of chick red blood cell nuclei. Chromatin appears as a thick fiber with an average diameter of approximately 300 Å when prepared for electron microscopy in buffers which approximate physiological ionic strength. Progressive steps of disassembly of the thick fiber into individual nucleosomes could be induced either by ionic strength reduction or by tRNA treatment (which removes histone H1 and some non-histone chromosomal proteins). When disassembly was induced by ionic strength reduction in the presence of Mg⁺⁺ (or Ca⁺⁺), the lengths of the intermediate disassembly products were found to be multiples of 330 Å. The diameter of these structures was estimated to be 275 Å. This intermediate in the disassembly process is not observed if thick fiber disassembly is induced by ionic strength reduction in the absence of divalent cations. To investigate whether the higher order structural unit is present in the thick fiber at physiological ionic strengths, tRNA treatment was used to induce thick fiber disassembly under physiological monovalent ionic conditions. In this case, either with or without divalent cations, a supranucleosomal unit was found with dimensions similar to those given above. This data provides evidence for a slightly oblong supranucleosomal structure (330 × 275 Å) which forms a repeating unit in the chromatin thick fiber.     

Nuclease digestion patterns as a criterion for nucleosome orientation in the higher order structure of chromatin

70 S ribosomes were programmed with initiator tRNA and messenger oligonucleotides AUG(U)n and AUG(C)n, where n = 1, 2 or 3. The binding of the ternary complexes [Phe-tRNA X EF-Tu X GTP] and [Pro-tRNA X EF-Tu X GTP] to the programmed ribosomes was studied. If codon-anticodon interaction is restricted to only one basepair, the ternary complex leaves the ribosome before GTP hydrolysis. Two basepairs allow hydrolysis of GTP, but the aminoacyl-tRNA dissociates and is recycled, resulting in wastage of GTP. Three basepairs result in apparently stable binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosome. The antibiotic sparsomycin weakens the binding by an amount roughly equivalent to one messenger base, while viomycin has the reverse effect.     

Theory of H1-mediated control of higher orders of structure in chromatin

It is known that the lysine-rich histone H1 induces both higher orders of folding in chromatin and donut shapes in DNA. However, these phenomena occur only on the high-salt side of a narrow transition range located at about 0.02M salt. Previous theoretical analyses of the ionic-strength dependencies of DNA persistence length and denaturation rate have provided the information that the basic rigid-rod unit in high-molecular-weight DNA is a segment 60 base pairs in length and that if the phosphate charge is neutralized, this segment will spontaneously adopt a bent conformation with radius of curvature 170 Å. On the assumption that an H1 molecule does not completely neutralize the DNA charge in its vicinity, the theory has been extended here to determine the onset of spontaneous bending as a function of salt concentration and extent of phosphate neutralization. A salt transition of the kind observed has been found for the realistic value of 82% charge neutralization, with the actual value likely to be in the neighborhood of 90%, as suggested by the measurements of Wilson and Bloomfield.¹ It is recalled that the spacer DNA length in chromatin is of about the same length as the DNA rigid-rod unit. If binding of H1 to the spacer induces, as predicted, a bent conformation of radius about 170 Å, then the observed value of about 150 Å for the outer radius of the solenoid presently thought to be the basic mode of folding for a nucleosome chain can be understood as a reflection of the inherent maximum curvature of DNA in aqueous salt solution.     

A higher order chromatin structure that is lost during differentiation of mouse neuroblastoma cells

Application of differential scanning calorimetry to nuclei from rapidly growing mouse neuroblastoma cells showed a melting profile with four major thermal transitions: I (60 degrees C), II (76 degrees C), III (88 degrees C), and IV (105 degrees C). When neuroblastoma cells were induced to differentiate by serum withdrawal or treatment with sodium butyrate, transition IV disappeared, while transition III increased in magnitude. Comparison was made to nuclei from several types of nondividing cells as well as a number of samples from mature tissues. In rapidly dividing cells the predominant endotherm was IV (105 degrees C), while in nondividing cells, transition III (88 degrees C) predominated the calorimetric profile. Cellular differentiation thus appeared to be accompanied by a major change in chromatin structure, as evidenced by a shift in melting temperature from 105 to 90 degrees C, and this may serve to distinguish the Go phase of the cell cycle from G1.     

DNase I digestion reveals alternating asymmetrical protection of the nucleosome by the higher order chromatin structure

DNase I was used to probe the higher order chromatin structure in whole nuclei. The digestion profiles obtained were the result of single-stranded cuts and were independent of pH, type of divalent ion and chromatin repeat length. Furthermore, the protection from digestion of the DNA at the entry/exit points on the nucleosome was found to be caused not by the H1/H5 histone tails, but by the compact structure that these proteins support. In order to resolve symmetry ambiguities, DNase I digestion fragments over several nucleosome repeat lengths were analysed quantitatively and compared with computer simulations using combinations of the experimentally obtained rate constants (some of which were converted to 0 to simulate steric protection from DNase I digestion). A clear picture of precisely defined, alternating, asymmetrically protected nucleosomes emerged. The linker DNA is inside the fibre, while the nucleosomes are positioned above and below a helical path and/or with alternating orientation towards the dyad axis. The dinucleosomal modulation of the digestion patterns comes from alternate protection of cutting sites inside the nucleosome and not from alternating exposure to the enzyme of the linker DNA.