共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Mariano Barbieri Benjamin L Moore Dorothee CA Kraemer Stuart Aitken Sheila Q Xie Kelly J Morris Masayoshi Itoh Hideya Kawaji Ines Jaeger Yoshihide Hayashizaki Piero Carninci Alistair RR Forrest The FANTOM Consortium Colin A Semple Josée Dostie Ana Pombo Mario Nicodemi 《Molecular systems biology》2015,11(12)
3.
4.
Radman-Livaja M Ruben G Weiner A Friedman N Kamakaka R Rando OJ 《The EMBO journal》2011,30(6):1012-1026
Chromatin domains are believed to spread via a polymerization-like mechanism in which modification of a given nucleosome recruits a modifying complex, which can then modify the next nucleosome in the polymer. In this study, we carry out genome-wide mapping of the Sir3 component of the Sir silencing complex in budding yeast during a time course of establishment of heterochromatin. Sir3 localization patterns do not support a straightforward model for nucleation and polymerization, instead showing strong but spatially delimited binding to silencers, and weaker and more variable Ume6-dependent binding to novel secondary recruitment sites at the seripauperin (PAU) genes. Genome-wide nucleosome mapping revealed that Sir binding to subtelomeric regions was associated with overpackaging of subtelomeric promoters. Sir3 also bound to a surprising number of euchromatic sites, largely at genes expressed at high levels, and was dynamically recruited to GAL genes upon galactose induction. Together, our results indicate that heterochromatin complex localization cannot simply be explained by nucleation and linear polymerization, and show that heterochromatin complexes associate with highly expressed euchromatic genes in many different organisms. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
A report on the Keystone symposium 'Non-coding RNAs' held at Snowbird, Utah, USA, 31 March to 5 April 2012. 相似文献
9.
Histone modifications not only play important roles in regulating chromatin structure and nuclear processes but also can be passed to daughter cells as epigenetic marks. Accumulating evidence suggests that the key function of histone modifications is to signal for recruitment or activity of downstream effectors. Here, we discuss the latest discovery of histone-modification readers and how the modification language is interpreted. 相似文献
10.
《Epigenetics》2013,8(11):1439-1445
Despite considerable efforts, our understanding of the organization of higher order chromatin conformations in single cells and how these relate to chromatin marks remains poor. We have earlier invented the Chromatin In Situ Proximity (ChrISP) technique to determine proximities between chromatin fibers within a single chromosome. Here we used ChrISP to identify chromosome 11-specific hubs that are enriched in the H3K9me2 mark and that project toward the nuclear membrane in finger-like structures. Conversely, chromosome 11-specfic chromatin hubs, visualized by the presence of either H3K9me1 or H3K9me3 marks, are chromosome-wide and largely absent at the nuclear periphery. As the nuclear periphery-specific chromatin hubs were lost in the induced reduction of H3K9me2 levels, they likely represent Large Organization Chromatin in Lysine Methylation (LOCK) domains, previously identified by ChIP-seq analysis. Strikingly, the downregulation of the H3K9me2/3 marks also led to the chromosome-wide compaction of chromosome 11, suggesting a pleiotropic function of these features not recognized before. The ChrISP-mediated visualization of dynamic chromatin states in single cells thus provides an analysis of chromatin structures with a resolution far exceeding that of any other light microscopic technique. 相似文献
11.
Xingqi Chen Samer Yammine Chengxi Shi Mariliis Tark-Dame Anita G?nd?r Rolf Ohlsson 《Epigenetics》2014,9(11):1439-1445
Despite considerable efforts, our understanding of the organization of higher order chromatin conformations in single cells and how these relate to chromatin marks remains poor. We have earlier invented the Chromatin In Situ Proximity (ChrISP) technique to determine proximities between chromatin fibers within a single chromosome. Here we used ChrISP to identify chromosome 11-specific hubs that are enriched in the H3K9me2 mark and that project toward the nuclear membrane in finger-like structures. Conversely, chromosome 11-specfic chromatin hubs, visualized by the presence of either H3K9me1 or H3K9me3 marks, are chromosome-wide and largely absent at the nuclear periphery. As the nuclear periphery-specific chromatin hubs were lost in the induced reduction of H3K9me2 levels, they likely represent Large Organization Chromatin in Lysine Methylation (LOCK) domains, previously identified by ChIP-seq analysis. Strikingly, the downregulation of the H3K9me2/3 marks also led to the chromosome-wide compaction of chromosome 11, suggesting a pleiotropic function of these features not recognized before. The ChrISP-mediated visualization of dynamic chromatin states in single cells thus provides an analysis of chromatin structures with a resolution far exceeding that of any other light microscopic technique. 相似文献
12.
Hideaki Niwa Noriko Handa Yuri Tomabechi Keiko Honda Mitsutoshi Toyama Noboru Ohsawa Mikako Shirouzu Hiroyuki Kagechika Tomoya Hirano Takashi Umehara Shigeyuki Yokoyama 《Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology》2013,69(4):595-602
SET7/9 is a protein lysine methyltransferase that methylates histone H3 and nonhistone proteins such as p53, TAF10 and oestrogen receptor α. In previous work, novel inhibitors of SET7/9 that are amine analogues of the coenzyme S‐(5′‐adenosyl)‐L‐methionine (AdoMet) have been developed. Here, crystal structures of SET7/9 are reported in complexes with two AdoMet analogues, designated DAAM‐3 and AAM‐1, in which an n‐hexylaminoethyl group or an n‐hexyl group is attached to the N atom that replaces the S atom of AdoMet, respectively. In both structures, the inhibitors bind to the coenzyme‐binding site and their additional alkyl chain binds in the lysine‐access channel. The N atom in the azaalkyl chain of DAAM‐3 is located at almost the same position as the N‐methyl C atom of the methylated lysine side chain in the substrate–peptide complex structures and stabilizes complex formation by hydrogen bonding to the substrate‐binding site residues of SET7/9. On the other hand, the alkyl chain of AAM‐1, which is a weaker inhibitor than DAAM‐3, binds in the lysine‐access channel only through hydrophobic and van der Waals interactions. Unexpectedly, the substrate‐binding site of SET7/9 complexed with AAM‐1 specifically interacts with the artificial N‐terminal sequence of an adjacent symmetry‐related molecule, presumably stabilizing the alkyl chain of AAM‐1. 相似文献
13.
14.
Axel Imhof 《Briefings in Functional Genomics and Prot》2006,5(3):222-227
Epigenetic inheritance is a key element in the adaptation of organisms to a rapidly changing environment without stably changing their DNA sequence. The necessary changes in its gene expression profiles are frequently associated with variations in chromatin structure. The conformation of chromatin is profoundly influenced by the post-translational modification of the histone proteins, the incorporation of histone variants, the activity of nucleosome remodelling factors and the association of non-histone chromatin proteins. Although the hierarchy of these factors is still not fully understood, genetic experiments suggest that histone-modifying enzymes play a major causal role in setting up a particular chromatin structure. In this article, the recent progress that was made to understand the molecular mechanisms of the targeting and regulation of histone modifiers and its implication for epigenetic inheritance are reviewed. 相似文献
15.
真核基因的表达受到各种顺式调控元件、反式作用因子、染色质DNA以及组蛋白表观遗传修饰等多因素、多层次的调控。染色质三维空间结构的变化在调控真核基因表达方面也发挥了至关重要的作用。染色质构象的变化一方面可以使增强子等调控元件与靶基因相互靠近,从而促进基因表达;同时也可能通过形成空间位阻结构阻碍调控元件作用于靶基因,抑制基因表达。虽然染色质结构变化调控真核基因表达的机制仍缺乏较为精确的分子模型,但在组蛋白修饰、核小体定位、染色体领域以及染色质间相互作用等表观遗传学研究中,已经发现有诸多证据支持染色质构象在真核基因表达调控中的重要地位。文章主要综述了染色质结构及其构象的变化等对真核基因表达调控的影响。 相似文献
16.
Protection of chromosome ends from DNA repair and degradation activities is mediated by specialized protein complexes bound to telomere repeats. Recently, it has become apparent that epigenetic regulation of the telomric chromatin template critically impacts on telomere function and telomere‐length homeostasis from yeast to man. Across all species, telomeric repeats as well as the adjacent subtelomeric regions carry features of repressive chromatin. Disruption of this silent chromatin environment results in loss of telomere‐length control and increased telomere recombination. In turn, progressive telomere loss reduces chromatin compaction at telomeric and subtelomeric domains. The recent discoveries of telomere chromatin regulation during early mammalian development, as well as during nuclear reprogramming, further highlights a central role of telomere chromatin changes in ontogenesis. In addition, telomeres were recently shown to generate long, non‐coding RNAs that remain associated to telomeric chromatin and will provide new insights into the regulation of telomere length and telomere chromatin. In this review, we will discuss the epigenetic regulation of telomeres across species, with special emphasis on mammalian telomeres. We will also discuss the links between epigenetic alterations at mammalian telomeres and telomere‐associated diseases. 相似文献
17.
18.
Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are characterized by distinct epigenetic features including a relative enrichment of histone modifications related to active chromatin. Among these is tri‐methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4me3). Several thousands of the H3K4me3‐enriched promoters in pluripotent cells also contain a repressive histone mark, namely H3K27me3, a situation referred to as “bivalency”. While bivalent promoters are not unique to pluripotent cells, they are relatively enriched in these cell types, largely marking developmental and lineage‐specific genes which are silent but poised for immediate action. The H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications are catalyzed by lysine methyltransferases which are usually found within, although not entirely limited to, the Trithorax group (TrxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) protein complexes, respectively, but these do not provide selective bivalent specificity. Recent studies highlight the family of ATP‐dependent chromatin remodeling proteins as regulators of bivalent domains. Here, we discuss bivalency in general, describe the machineries that catalyze bivalent chromatin domains, and portray the emerging connection between bivalency and the action of different families of chromatin remodelers, namely INO80, esBAF, and NuRD, in pluripotent cells. We posit that chromatin remodeling proteins may enable “bivalent specificity”, often selectively acting on, or selectively depleted from, bivalent domains. 相似文献
19.
20.