Dynein-dependent processive chromosome motions promote homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis

Meiotic chromosome segregation requires homologue pairing, synapsis, and crossover recombination, which occur during meiotic prophase. Telomere-led chromosome motion has been observed or inferred to occur during this stage in diverse species, but its mechanism and function remain enigmatic. In Caenorhabditis elegans, special chromosome regions known as pairing centers (PCs), rather than telomeres, associate with the nuclear envelope (NE) and the microtubule cytoskeleton. In this paper, we investigate chromosome dynamics in living animals through high-resolution four-dimensional fluorescence imaging and quantitative motion analysis. We find that chromosome movement is constrained before meiosis. Upon prophase onset, constraints are relaxed, and PCs initiate saltatory, processive, dynein-dependent motions along the NE. These dramatic motions are dispensable for homologous pairing and continue until synapsis is completed. These observations are consistent with the idea that motions facilitate pairing by enhancing the search rate but that their primary function is to trigger synapsis. This quantitative analysis of chromosome dynamics in a living animal extends our understanding of the mechanisms governing faithful genome inheritance.     

A family of zinc-finger proteins is required for chromosome-specific pairing and synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans

Homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis are prerequisite for accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis. Here, we show that a family of four related C2H2 zinc-finger proteins plays a central role in these events in C. elegans. These proteins are encoded within a tandem gene cluster. In addition to the X-specific HIM-8 protein, three additional paralogs collectively mediate the behavior of the five autosomes. Each chromosome relies on a specific member of the family to pair and synapse with its homolog. These "ZIM" proteins concentrate at special regions called meiotic pairing centers on the corresponding chromosomes. These sites are dispersed along the nuclear envelope during early meiotic prophase, suggesting a role analogous to the telomere-mediated meiotic bouquet in other organisms. To gain insight into the evolution of these components, we characterized homologs in C. briggsae and C. remanei, which revealed changes in copy number of this gene family within the nematode lineage.     

Chromosome-wide control of meiotic crossing over in C. elegans

A central event in sexual reproduction is the reduction in chromosome number that occurs at the meiosis I division. Most eukaryotes rely on crossing over between homologs, and the resulting chiasmata, to direct meiosis I chromosome segregation, yet make very few crossovers per chromosome pair. This indicates that meiotic recombination must be tightly regulated to ensure that each chromosome pair enjoys the crossover necessary to ensure correct segregation. Here, we investigate control of meiotic crossing over in Caenorhabditis elegans, which averages only one crossover per chromosome pair per meiosis, by constructing genetic maps of end-to-end fusions of whole chromosomes. Fusion of chromosomes removes the requirement for a crossover in each component chromosome segment and thereby reveals a propensity to restrict the number of crossovers such that pairs of fusion chromosomes composed of two or even three whole chromosomes enjoy but a single crossover in the majority of meioses. This regulation can operate over physical distances encompassing half the genome. The meiotic behavior of heterozygous fusion chromosomes further suggests that continuous meiotic chromosome axes, or structures that depend on properly assembled axes, may be important for crossover regulation.     

The many facets of SC function during C. elegans meiosis

Sexually reproducing organisms rely on meiosis for the formation of haploid gametes. This is achieved through two consecutive rounds of cell division (meiosis I and II) after one round of DNA replication. During the meiotic divisions, chromosomes face several challenges to ultimately ensure proper chromosome segregation. Unique events unfold during meiosis I to overcome these challenges. Homologous chromosomes pair, synapse, and recombine. A remarkable feature throughout this process is the formation of an evolutionarily conserved tripartite proteinaceous structure known as the synaptonemal complex (SC). It is comprised of two lateral elements, assembled along each axis of a pair of homologous chromosomes, and a central region consisting of transverse filaments bridging the gap between lateral elements. While the presence of the SC during meiosis has been appreciated now for 50 years (Moses, Biophys Biochem Cytol 2:215–218, 1956; Fawcett, J Biophys Biochem Cytol 2:403–406, 1956), its role(s) remain a matter of intense investigation. This review concentrates on studies performed in Caenorhabditis elegans, a powerful system for investigating meiosis. Studies in this organism are contributing to the unraveling of the various processes leading to the formation of the SC and the various facets of the functions it exerts throughout meiosis.The synaptonemal complex-50 years     

The chromodomain protein MRG-1 facilitates SC-independent homologous pairing during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans

Homologous chromosome pairing is a prerequisite to establish physical linkage between homologs, which is critical for faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I. The establishment of pairing is genetically separable from subsequent synapsis, defined as stabilization of pairing by the synaptonemal complex (SC). The underlying mechanism of presynaptic pairing is poorly understood. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a unique cis-acting element, the pairing center (PC), is essential for presynaptic pairing; however, it is not known whether and how the remainder of the chromosome contributes to presynaptic pairing. Here we report direct evidence for presynaptic pairing activity intrinsic to non-PC regions, which is facilitated by a conserved chromodomain protein, MRG-1. In mrg-1 loss-of-function mutants, pairing is compromised specifically in non-PC regions, leading to nonhomologous SC assembly. Our data support a model in which presynaptic alignment in non-PC regions collaborates with initial PC pairing to ensure correct homologous synapsis.     

The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis

We identify a highly specific mutation (jf18) in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear envelope protein matefin MTF-1/SUN-1 that provides direct evidence for active involvement of the nuclear envelope in homologous chromosome pairing in C. elegans meiosis. The reorganization of chromatin in early meiosis is disrupted in mtf-1/sun-1(jf18) gonads, concomitant with the absence of presynaptic homolog alignment. Synapsis is established precociously and nonhomologously. Wild-type leptotene/zygotene nuclei show patch-like aggregations of the ZYG-12 protein, which fail to develop in mtf-1/sun-1(jf18) mutants. These patches remarkably colocalize with a component of the cis-acting chromosomal pairing center (HIM-8) rather than the centrosome. Our data on this mtf-1/sun-1 allele challenge the previously postulated role of the centrosome/spindle organizing center in chromosome pairing, and clearly support a role for MTF-1/SUN-1 in meiotic chromosome reorganization and in homolog recognition, possibly by mediating local aggregation of the ZYG-12 protein in meiotic nuclei.     

Depletion of a Cks homolog in C. elegans embryos uncovers a post-metaphase role in both meiosis and mitosis

In eukaryotic cells, the key regulators of cell-cycle transitions are the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). The best studied CDK is a component of the M-phase promoting factor (MPF), which promotes entry into and progression through meiosis and mitosis. One of the enduring mysteries of the MPF complex has been the role of Cks/Suc1, a highly conserved member of the cell-cycle machinery in eukaryotes [1,2]. Cks has been proposed to be involved in activation of MPF [3], general interactions of MPF with its mitotic substrates [4] and/or inactivation of MPF [5,6]. We identified two Cks homologs in the genome of Caenorhabditis elegans and used RNA-mediated interference (RNAi) to investigate their roles in development. Whereas cks-2(RNAi) embryos display no apparent defects, cks-1(RNAi) embryos display defects in both meiosis and mitosis. Specifically, cks-1(RNAi) embryos fail to exit M phase properly. We propose that CKS-1 has an essential role in the inactivation of MPF during early C. elegans embryogenesis.     

Pattern formation during vulval development in C. elegans

Previous studies have shown that the development of the vulva of the C. elegans hermaphrodite involves six multipotential hypodermal cells as well as the gonadal anchor cell, which induces vulval formation. Our further examination of the interactions among these seven cells has led to the following model. Each hypodermal precursor cell becomes determined to adopt one of its three potential fates; each of these fates is to generate a particular cell lineage. In the absence of cellular interactions each precursor cell will generate the nonvulval cell lineage; an inductive signal from the anchor cell is required for a precursor cell to generate either of the two types of vulval cell lineages. The inductive signal is spatially graded, and the potency of the signal specifies which lineage is expressed by each of the tripotential precursor cells.     

Non-homologous chromosome pairing and crossover formation in haploid rice meiosis

While many studies have provided significant insight into homolog pairing during meiosis, information on non-homologous pairing is much less abundant. In the present study, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to investigate non-homologous pairing in haploid rice during meiosis. At pachytene, non-homologous chromosomes paired and formed synaptonemal complexes. FISH analysis data indicated that chromosome pairing could be grouped into three major types: (1) single chromosome paired fold-back as the univalent structure, (2) two non-homologous chromosomes paired as the bivalent structure, and (3) three or more non-homologous chromosomes paired as the multivalent structure. In the survey of 70 cells, 65 contained univalents, 45 contained bivalents, and 49 contained multivalent. Moreover, chromosomes 9 and 10 as well as chromosomes 11 and 12 formed non-homologous bivalents at a higher frequency than the other chromosomes. However, chiasma was always detected in the bivalent only between chromosomes 11 and 12 at diakinesis or metaphase I, indicating the pairing between these two chromosomes leads non-homologous recombination during meiosis. The synaptonemal complex formation between non-homologs was further proved by immunodetection of RCE8, PAIR2, and ZEP1. Especially, ZEP1 only loaded onto the paired chromosomes other than the un-paired chromosomes at pachytene in haploid.     

Chromosome sites play dual roles to establish homologous synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans

We have investigated the role of pairing centers (PCs), cis-acting sites required for accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis in C. elegans. We find that these sites play two distinct roles that contribute to proper segregation. Chromosomes lacking PCs usually fail to synapse and also lack a synapsis-independent stabilization activity. The presence of a PC on just one copy of a chromosome pair promotes synapsis but does not support synapsis-independent pairing stabilization, indicating that these functions are separable. Once initiated, synapsis is highly processive, even between nonhomologous chromosomes of disparate lengths, elucidating how translocations suppress meiotic recombination in C. elegans. These findings suggest a multistep pathway for chromosome synapsis in which PCs impart selectivity and efficiency through a "kinetic proofreading" mechanism. We speculate that concentration of these activities at one region per chromosome may have coevolved with the loss of a point centromere to safeguard karyotype stability.     

Chromosome segregation during female meiosis in C. elegans: A tale of pushing and pulling

The role of the kinetochore during meiotic chromosome segregation in C. elegans oocytes has been a matter of controversy. Danlasky et al. (2020. J. Cell. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202005179) show that kinetochore proteins KNL-1 and KNL-3 are required for early stages of anaphase during female meiosis, suggesting a new kinetochore-based model of chromosome segregation.

Meiosis consists of two consecutive chromosome segregation events preceded by a single round of DNA replication. Homologous chromosomes are separated in meiosis I, which is followed by sister chromatid separation in meiosis II to produce haploid gametes. Both of these stages require chromosomes/chromatids to align during metaphase before separating to opposite poles during anaphase. During mitosis, microtubules emanating from centrosomes at opposite poles of the cell bind chromosomes through a multiprotein complex called the kinetochore, allowing chromosomes to be pulled apart (1, 2). This segregation event takes place in two stages: anaphase A, where chromosomes are pulled toward spindle poles due to microtubule depolymerization, and anaphase B, where spindle poles themselves move farther apart, taking the attached chromosomes with them (3, 4). In many organisms, including mammals, oocytes lack centrosomes, and it has been of great interest to clarify the mechanisms used to ensure chromosomes are properly segregated during female meiosis (5, 6). Caenorhabditis elegans has served as a model for studying both mitosis and meiosis, but the mechanisms operating during female meiosis have been a matter of debate and controversy.In 2010, Dumont et al. showed that the kinetochore is required for chromosome alignment and congression during metaphase (7). However, they suggested that chromosome segregation was the result of microtubule polymerization between the segregating chromosomes (Fig. 1), resulting in a pushing force exerted onto chromosomes toward the spindle poles in a largely kinetochore-independent manner (7). This mechanism was also supported by the finding that CLIP-associated protein (CLASP)–dependent microtubule polymerization between the segregating chromosomes is essential for chromosome separation (8). An alternative model suggested that chromosomes are transported through microtubule-free channels toward the spindle poles by the action of dynein (9). Later evidence put in doubt a role for dynein and favored a model in which chromosomes initially separate when the spindle shortens and the poles overlap with chromosomes in an anaphase A–like mechanism. This is then followed by separation of chromosome-bound poles by outward microtubule sliding in an anaphase B–like fashion (10). However, because microtubules emanating from the spindle poles are not required to separate the homologous chromosomes but microtubules between the separating chromosomes are (8), this model is unlikely, at least as an explanation for mid-/late-anaphase movement. Furthermore, although lateral microtubule interactions with chromosomes predominate during metaphase of C. elegans oocyte meiosis, cryo-electron tomography data described end-on attachments between the separating chromosomes as anaphase progresses (11). This led to the suggestion that lateral microtubule interactions with chromosomes are responsible for the initial separation, but microtubule polymerization between the separating chromosomes is required for the later stages of segregation (11). The mechanisms involved in this initial separation have remained obscure. In this issue, Danlasky et al. show that the kinetochore is in fact required for the initial stages of chromosome segregation during female meiosis—an important step forward in our understanding of the mechanisms governing acentrosomal chromosome segregation (12).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Some of the key findings in Danlasky et al. Kinetochore proteins surround the outer surface of the chromosomes, resulting in a characteristic cup shape. As anaphase progresses, chromosomes come into close contact to the spindle poles (anaphase A). Chromosome stretching is provided by KNL-1, MIS-12 (KNL-3), and NDC-80 (KMN)–dependent forces. Once the spindle starts elongating (anaphase B), central spindle microtubules provide the pushing forces for chromosome segregation. At this stage, kinetochore proteins also occupy the inward face of separating chromosomes. Upon KMN network depletion, bivalents flatten, and chromosome congression and alignment are defective. Anaphase A chromosome movement is almost absent, which leads to error-prone anaphase B.By simultaneously depleting kinetochore proteins KNL-1 and KNL-3 in C. elegans, Danlasky et al. observed the meiotic chromosome congression and alignment defects described in previous studies (7). However, this double-depletion phenotype displayed three key characteristics that suggested a role for kinetochores in chromosome segregation, which are discussed below.The kinetochore is required for bivalent stretching. It was previously shown that the bivalent chromosomes stretch before the initiation of segregation (10). Danlasky et. al found that this stretching of the chromosomes did not occur when KNL-1,3 were depleted, indicating that the kinetochore is required for this process (Fig. 1). Together with the observation that kinetochore proteins appear to extend toward the spindle poles, this finding suggested that pulling forces resulting from the interaction between the kinetochore and spindle microtubules are occurring during metaphase/preanaphase (Fig. 1).The kinetochore is required for anaphase A. In C. elegans female meiosis, anaphase A occurs when homologous chromosomes begin to separate during spindle shortening, and anaphase B when the chromosomes separate alongside the spindle poles (10). Danlasky et al. observed that KNL-1,3 depletion drastically reduced the velocity of anaphase A, as chromosomes only separated when spindle poles began to move apart. This indicated that pulling forces caused by the interaction between the kinetochore and spindle microtubules are also important for the initial separation of homologous chromosomes in anaphase A.The kinetochore is required for proper separation of homologous chromosomes. In KNL-1,3 depletion strains, 60% of bivalents failed to separate before segregation began, resulting in intact bivalents being pulled to the same spindle pole (Fig. 1). This failure of homologous chromosomes to separate was not thought to be a result of KNL-1,3 depletion interfering with the cleavage of cohesin that holds the two homologous chromosomes together because (a) separase and AIR-2^AuroraB, both of which are required for cohesin cleavage, localized normally during metaphase and anaphase, and (b) bivalents separated by metaphase II. This leaves the possibility open that the failure of bivalents to separate was due to the disrupted pulling forces thought to be important in bivalent stretching and anaphase A.Altogether, these data strongly indicate that the kinetochore is required not only for chromosome congression and alignment but also for the early stages of homologue separation. Anaphase B occurred successfully in the absence of KNL-1,3 but was more error prone, likely as a result of the earlier congression and anaphase A defects. While it is clear that chromosome masses do segregate in the absence of the kinetochore, this segregation is highly erroneous as a result of defects during the earlier stages of segregation in anaphase A (Fig. 1).The findings of Danlasky et al. raise testable hypotheses that could significantly enhance our understanding of acentrosomal chromosome segregation. Further investigation of the proposed pulling forces required during metaphase and early anaphase will be of great interest. Additionally, a more detailed analysis of the dynamic localization of separase and Securin, as well as assessing successful cohesin cleavage when KNL-1,3 are depleted, would back up the assertion that the failure of homologous chromosomes to separate was not due to the kinetochore impacting cohesin cleavage. It has previously been shown that the CLASP orthologue CLS-2 in C. elegans localizes to the kinetochore surrounding the bivalent chromosomes during metaphase before relocalizing to the central spindle during anaphase (7, 8, 13). It will be interesting to examine whether this key microtubule-stabilizing protein contributes to anaphase A pulling forces alongside its essential role in microtubule polymerization between chromosomes in anaphase B (8).While the regulation of proper chromosome segregation during acentrosomal meiosis in C. elegans is not yet fully understood, Danlasky et al.’s results represent a significant step forward in this endeavor by showing that the kinetochore is in fact required for the early stages of chromosome segregation.     

Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis

Crossing over and chiasma formation during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis require msh-5, which encodes a conserved germline-specific MutS family member. msh-5 mutant oocytes lack chiasmata between homologous chromosomes, and crossover frequencies are severely reduced in both oocyte and spermatocyte meiosis. Artificially induced DNA breaks do not bypass the requirement for msh-5, suggesting that msh-5 functions after the initiation step of meiotic recombination. msh-5 mutants are apparently competent to repair breaks induced during meiosis, but accomplish repair in a way that does not lead to crossovers between homologs. These results combine with data from budding yeast to establish a conserved role for Msh5 proteins in promoting the crossover outcome of meiotic recombination events. Apart from the crossover deficit, progression through meiotic prophase is largely unperturbed in msh-5 mutants. Homologous chromosomes are fully aligned at the pachytene stage, and germ cells survive to complete meiosis and gametogenesis with high efficiency. Our demonstration that artificially induced breaks generate crossovers and chiasmata using the normal meiotic recombination machinery suggests (1) that association of breaks with a preinitiation complex is not a prerequisite for entering the meiotic recombination pathway and (2) that the decision for a subset of recombination events to become crossovers is made after the initiation step.     

Polo kinases establish links between meiotic chromosomes and cytoskeletal forces essential for homolog pairing

During meiosis, chromosomes must find and align with their homologous partners. SUN and KASH-domain protein pairs play a conserved role by establishing transient linkages between chromosome ends and cytoskeletal forces across the intact nuclear envelope (NE). In C.?elegans, a pairing center (PC) on each chromosome mediates homolog pairing and linkage to the microtubule network. We report that the polo kinases PLK-1 and PLK-2 are targeted to the PC by ZIM/HIM-8-pairing proteins. Loss of plk-2 inhibits chromosome pairing and licenses synapsis between nonhomologous chromosomes, indicating that PLK-2 is required for PC-mediated interhomolog interactions. plk-2 is also required for meiosis-specific phosphorylation of SUN-1 and establishment of dynamic SUN/KASH (SUN-1/ZYG-12) modules that promote homolog pairing. Our results provide key insights into the regulation of homolog pairing and reveal that targeting of polo-like kinases to the NE by meiotic chromosomes establishes the conserved linkages to cytoskeletal forces needed for homology assessment.     

Differential role of CENP-A in the segregation of holocentric C. elegans chromosomes during meiosis and mitosis

Two distinct chromosome architectures are prevalent among eukaryotes: monocentric, in which localized centromeres restrict kinetochore assembly to a single chromosomal site, and holocentric, in which diffuse kinetochores form along the entire chromosome length. During mitosis, both chromosome types use specialized chromatin, containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A, to direct kinetochore assembly. For the segregation of recombined homologous chromosomes during meiosis, monocentricity is thought to be crucial for limiting spindle-based forces to one side of a crossover and to prevent recombined chromatids from being simultaneously pulled towards both spindle poles. The mechanisms that allow holocentric chromosomes to avert this fate remain uncharacterized. Here, we show that markedly different mechanisms segregate holocentric chromosomes during meiosis and mitosis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Immediately prior to oocyte meiotic segregation, outer-kinetochore proteins were recruited to cup-like structures on the chromosome surface via a mechanism that is independent of CENP-A. In striking contrast to mitosis, both oocyte meiotic divisions proceeded normally following depletion of either CENP-A or the closely associated centromeric protein CENP-C. These findings highlight a pronounced difference between the segregation of holocentric chromosomes during meiosis and mitosis and demonstrate the potential to uncouple assembly of outer-kinetochore proteins from CENP-A chromatin.     

Autophagy links lipid metabolism to longevity in C. elegans

The cellular recycling process of autophagy is emerging as a central player in many of the conserved longevity pathways in C. elegans, but the underlying mechanisms that link autophagy and life span remain unclear. In a recent study, we provided evidence to suggest that autophagy modulates aging through an effect on lipid homeostasis. Specifically, we identified a role for autophagy in a longevity model in which germline removal in C. elegans extends life span. Life-span extension in these animals is achieved, at least in part, through increased expression of the lipase LIPL-4. We found that autophagy and LIPL-4-dependent lipolysis are both upregulated in germline-less animals and work interdependently to prolong life span. While these genetic results lend further support to a growing link between autophagy and lipid metabolism, our findings are the first to suggest a possible molecular mechanism by which autophagy modulates organismal aging.