The distribution of H1 histone is nonuniform in chromatin and correlates with different degrees of condensation

Salt induces aggregation of large chromatin fragments maximally at 150-200 mM NaCl. The soluble fragments are depleted of H1 histones while the aggregated fragments are enriched. H1 histones did not equilibrate between the soluble and insoluble chromatin fractions when they were recycled through the process of salt-induced aggregation. The chromatin fragments that resisted aggregation retained more H1c subtype than they did H1 ab, correlating with previous results which showed complexes of H1c with DNA resisted salt-induced aggregation much more than complexes of DNA with other subtypes. The chromatin that was soluble at physiological concentrations of NaCl was DNase I sensitive and enriched in acetylated core histones. We conclude that H1 histone is nonuniformly distributed in chromatin in a stable pattern that probably correlates with the different degrees of condensation known to exist in vivo.     

Interaction of histone H1 from sea urchin sperm with superhelical and relaxed DNA

Complexes of histone H1 from sea urchin sperm (H1S) and calf thymus (H1T) with superhelical DNA I and relaxed circular DNA II have been analyzed by analytical sedimentation. Similar to H1T, the highly basic and relatively arginine-rich histone H1S preferentially interacts with DNA I compared to DNA II under competition conditions. However, H1S induces a stronger aggregation of bothforms of DNA than H1T. Below 0.05 M NaCl, the soluble complexes formed by both histones have similar properties, but aggregation proceeds in a different manner: H1S induces a stronger aggregation of DNA II as compared to DNA I, whereas H1T fails to aggregate DNA I.The results are explained on the basis of differences in amino acid sequence and structure of the two histones and related to the special chromatin condensing ability of histone H1S.     

Effect of salt on the binding of the linker histone H1 to DNA and nucleosomes

The linker histones are involved in the salt-dependent folding of the nucleosomes into higher-order chromatin structures. To better understand the mechanism of action of these histones in chromatin, we studied the interactions of the linker histone H1 with DNA at various histone/DNA ratios and at different ionic strengths. In direct competition experiments, we have confirmed the binding of H1 to superhelical DNA in preference to linear or nicked circular DNA forms. We show that the electrophoretic mobility of the H1/supercoiled DNA complex decreases with increasing H1 concentrations and increases with ionic strengths. These results indicate that the interaction of the linker histone H1 with supercoiled DNA results in a soluble binding of H1 with DNA at low H1 or salt concentrations and aggregation at higher H1 concentrations. Moreover, we show that H1 dissociates from the DNA or nucleosomes at high salt concentrations. By the immobilized template pull-down assay, we confirm these data using the physiologically relevant nucleosome array template.     

Salt-dependent co-operative interaction of histone H1 with linear DNA

The nature of the complexes formed between histone H1 and linear double-stranded DNA is dependent on ionic strength and on the H1 : DNA ratio. At an input ratio of less than about 60% (w/w) H1 : DNA, there is a sharp transition from non-co-operative to co-operative binding at a critical salt concentration that depends on the DNA size and is in the range 20 to 50 mM-NaCl. Above this critical ionic strength the H1 binds to only some of the DNA molecules leaving the rest free, as shown by sedimentation analysis. The ionic strength range over which this change in behaviour occurs is also that over which chromatin folding is induced. Above the salt concentration required for co-operative binding of H1 to DNA, but not below it, H1 molecules are in close proximity as shown by the formation of H1 polymers upon chemical cross-linking. The change in binding mode is not driven by the folding of the globular domain of H1, since this is already folded at low salt in the presence of DNA, as indicated by its resistance to tryptic digestion. The H1-DNA complexes at low salt, where H1 is bound distributively to all DNA molecules, contain thickened regions about 6 nm across interspersed with free DNA, as shown by electron microscopy. The complexes formed at higher salt through co-operative interactions are rods of relatively uniform width (11 to 15 nm) whose length is about 1.6 times shorter than that of the input DNA, or are circular if the DNA is long enough. They contain approximately 70% (w/w) H1 : DNA and several DNA molecules. These thick complexes can also be formed at low salt (15 mM-NaCl) when the H1 : DNA input ratio is sufficiently high (approximately 70%).     

Investigation of Ternary Complexes: DNA–Phosphatidylcholine Liposomes–Mg<Superscript>2+</Superscript> by Freeze-Fracture Method and Their Role in the Formation of Some Cell Structures

Long-term investigations of ternary complexes: DNA–zwitterionic liposomes–divalent metal cations have revealed many details of their structure; but some questions need additional study. The conditions under which fusion or aggregation of liposomes occurs during such complex formation remain obscure. The DNA structure in the ternary complex is still unclear. In this work, using a freeze-fracture method, author demonstrate the thin structure of a complex (early attempts to observe this structure employing other electron microscopic methods, in particular cryo-TEM, have not met with success). After treatment of ternary complexes with nuclease S1, which is able to digest single-stranded DNA, local DNA unwinding in such complexes was confirmed. Author describe how the curvature of liposomes as the main factor may determine the interaction between liposomes and DNA, especially aggregation or fusion of liposomes during ternary complex formation. Therefore, interaction between lipids of membrane vesicles in cell and chromatin DNA can be the first stage of a nuclear envelope and pore complex assembly.     

Co-existence of two different types of soluble histone complexes in nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes

The nuclear pool of soluble histones in Xenopus laevis oocytes is organized into two major types of acidic histone complexes separable by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. One type of complex sediments at 5 S (Mr approximately 120,000), is isoelectric at pH 4.6, and contains histones H3 and/or H4 tightly bound to one polypeptide of a pair of very acidic polypeptides, designated N1 and N2 (Kleinschmidt, J. A., and Franke, W. W. (1982) Cell 29, 799-809). This complex can be selectively immunoprecipitated by guinea pig antibodies against purified protein N1/N2. In contrast, a larger complex of 7 S contains four histones and nucleoplasmin (the purified protein exists as a pentamer of a polypeptide of Mr approximately 30,000), is isoelectric over the pH range of 5-7, and can be immunoprecipitated by nucleoplasmin antibodies. Its relative molecular weight of 130,000-170,000, as determined by gel filtration, sucrose density gradient centrifugation, and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the cross-linked complexes, excludes the association of a histone octamer with nucleoplasmin. In addition to histones H2A and H2B, two histones (designated H3 and H4) which are similar in their electrophoretic mobilities to histones H3 and H4 but have lower isoelectric pH values are enriched in immuno-precipitates obtained with nucleoplasmin antibodies. Cross-linking of complexes present in intact nuclei, using 1% formaldehyde at near-physiological ionic strength and pH, indicates the coexistence of these two soluble histone complexes in the living cell. In chromatin assembly experiments using SV 40 DNA, both histone fractions are able to transfer histones to DNA, resulting in an increase of DNA superhelicity and the formation of beaded nucleoprotein complexes of nucleosome-like morphology. The common principle governing both types of complexes, i.e. the association of one or two histone molecules with a karyophilic large acidic histone-binding protein is emphasized. We discuss the possible role of these complexes in storing histones utilized in chromatin assembly during early amphibian embryogenesis as well as the possible existence of similar complexes, albeit at lower concentrations, in somatic cells.     

The extraction by micrococcal nuclease of glucocorticoid receptors and mouse mammary tumor virus DNA sequences is dissociated.

Glucocorticoid receptors (RG) and mammary tumor virus (MM-TV) DNA sequences were extracted by micrococcal nuclease digestion from the nuclei of C3H mouse mammary tumor cells in order to specify their relative distribution in chromatin. RG was labelled and translocated into the nuclei by incubating cells with 3H Dexamethasone (3H Dex). The purified nuclei were then treated at 2 degrees C with micrococcal nuclease. Three chromatin fractions were successively obtained: an isotonic extract (ne3H1), ahypotonic extract (ne2) and the residual pellet (P). The Dex-RG complexes were measured by the hydroxyapatite technique. The MMTV DNA sequences were titrated by molecular hybridization with an excess of MMTV radioactive cDNA probe. Up to 75% of the nuclear 3H Dex and the MMTV radioactive cDNA probe. Up to 75% of the nuclear 3H Dex and MMTV DNA sequences were extracted in a concentration dependent manner while only 10-15% of nucleic acids became soluble in 10% perchloric acid. The extracted 3H Dex-RG complex was found to be partly bound to soluble chromatin and partly free. The free complex displayed similar sedimentation constants (4S, 7S) and DNA binding ability to the cytosol receptor. The 3H Dex-RG complexes were 2 to 8 fold more concentrated in ne1, which is known to be enriched in active chromatin, than in ne2. Conversely, the concentration of MMTV DNA sequences per microgram DNA was the same in the three nuclear fractions. These results suggest that the Dex-RG complexes are concentrated in an active fraction of chromatin. We propose that, among the 20-30 copies of MMTV genes per haploid genome, only a small proportion are transcribed or regulated.     

Cooperative binding of the globular domains of histones H1 and H5 to DNA.

In view of the likely role of H1-H1 interactions in the stabilization of chromatin higher order structure, we have asked whether interactions can occur between the globular domains of the histone molecules. We have studied the properties of the isolated globular domains of H1 and the variant H5 (GH1 and GH5) and we have shown (by sedimentation analysis, electron microscopy, chemical cross-linking and nucleoprotein gel electrophoresis) that although GH1 shows no, and GH5 little if any, tendency to self-associate in dilute solution, they bind highly cooperatively to DNA. The resulting complexes appear to contain essentially continuous arrays of globular domains bridging 'tramlines' of DNA, similar to those formed with intact H1, presumably reflecting the ability of the globular domain to bind more than one DNA segment, as it is likely to do in the nucleosome. Additional (thicker) complexes are also formed with GH5, probably resulting from association of the primary complexes, possibly with binding of additional GH5. The highly cooperative nature of the binding, in close apposition, of GH1 and GH5 to DNA is fully compatible with the involvement of interactions between the globular domains of H1 and its variants in chromatin folding.     

The combination of DNA methylation and H1 histone binding inhibits the action of a restriction nuclease on plasmid DNA.

To investigate the potentials of DNA methylation and H1 histone in regulating the action of DNA binding proteins, well ordered complexes were formed by slow salt gradient dialysis of mixtures of H1 histone with either methylated or nonmethylated DNA. The sites methylated in the plasmids were CCGG. Methylation of cytosine in this site protects the DNA against HpaII endonuclease but not against MspI. However, when the methylated DNA was complexed to H1, it was protected against MspI. The protection was only effective for a subset of the MspI restriction sites. The protection of DNA afforded by the combination of H1 binding and DNA methylation did not apply to EcoRI, PstI, or BamHI sites and so did not seem to be due to aggregation of the DNA by H1 histone. Gel retardation assays indicated that the affinity of H1 for methylated DNA was not detectably different from its affinity for nonmethylated DNA. Probably methylated DNA when bound to H1 is in a conformation that is resistant to MspI endonuclease. Such conformational changes induced by DNA methylation and H1 binding might affect the action of other DNA binding proteins, perhaps in chromatin as well as in H1.DNA complexes.     

Kinetics of accumulation and depletion of soluble newly synthesized histone in the reciprocal regulation of histone and DNA synthesis

Procedures are presented which permit the identification and analysis of cellular histone that is not bound to chromatin. This histone, called soluble histone, could be distinguished from that bound to chromatin by the state of H4 modification and the lack of H2A ubiquitination. Changes in the levels of newly synthesized soluble histone were analyzed with respect to the balance between histone and DNA synthesis in hamster ovary cells. Pulse-chase protocols suggested that the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction into chromatin may have two kinetic components with half-depletion times of about 1 and 40 min. When protein synthesis was inhibited, the pulse-chase kinetics of newly synthesized histone from the solubl fraction into chromatin were not significantly altered from those of the control. However, in contrast to the control, when protein synthesis was inhibited, DNA synthesis was also inhibited with kinetics similar to those of the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction. There was a rapid decrease in the rate of DNA synthesis with a half-deceleration time of 1 min down to about 30% of the control rate, followed by a slower decrease with an approximate half-deceleration time of 40 min. When DNA synthesis was inhibited, newly synthesized histone accumulated in the soluble fraction, but H2A and H2B continued to complex with chromatin at a significant rate. Soluble histone in G1 cells showed the same differential partitioning of H4/H3 and H2A/H2B between the soluble and chromatin-bound fractions as was found in cycling cells with inhibited DNA synthesis. These results support a unified model of reciprocal regulatory mechanisms between histone and DNA synthesis in the assembly of chromatin.     

The chlamydial EUO gene encodes a histone H1-specific protease.

Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen, long recognized as an agent of blinding eye disease and more recently as a common sexually transmitted infection. Recently, two eukaryotic histone H1-like proteins, designated Hc1 and Hc2, have been identified in Chlamydia. Expression of Hc1 in recombinant Escherichia coli produces chromatin condensation similar to nucleoid condensation observed late in the parasite's own life cycle. In contrast, chromatin decondensation, observed during the early life cycle, accompanies down-regulation and nondetection of Hc1 and Hc2 among internalized organisms. We reasoned that the early upstream open reading frame (EUO) gene product might play a role in Hc1 degradation and nucleoid decondensation since it is expressed very early in the chlamydial life cycle. To explore this possibility, we fused the EUO coding region between amino acids 4 and 177 from C. trachomatis serovar Lz with glutathione S-transferase (GST) and examined the effects of fusion protein on Hc1 in vitro. The purified fusion protein was able to digest Hc1 completely within 1 h at 37 degrees C. However, GST alone exhibited no Hc1-specific proteolytic activity. The chlamydial EUO-GST gene product also cleaves very-lysine-rich calf thymus histone H1 and chicken erythrocyte histone H5 but displays no measurable activity towards core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 or chlamydial RNA polymerase alpha-subunit. This proteolytic activity appears sensitive to the serine protease inhibitor 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF) and aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin but resistant to high temperature and other broad-spectrum protease inhibitors. The proteolytic activity specified by the EUO-GST fusion product selectively digested the C-terminal portion of chlamydial Hc1, the domain involved in DNA binding, while leaving the N terminus intact. At a molar equivalent ratio of 1:1 between Hc1 and DNA, the EUO gene product cleaves Hc1 complexed to DNA and this cleavage appears sufficient to initiate dissociation of DNA-Hc1 complexes. However, at a higher molar equivalent ratio of Hc1/DNA (10:1), there is partial protection conferred upon Hc1 to an extent that prevents dissociation of DNA-Hc1 complexes.     

The interaction of HMGB1 and linker histones occurs through their acidic and basic tails

H1 and HMGB1 bind to linker DNA in chromatin, in the vicinity of the nucleosome dyad. They appear to have opposing effects on the nucleosome, H1 stabilising it by "sealing" two turns of DNA around the octamer, and HMGB1 destabilising it, probably by bending the adjacent DNA. Their presence in chromatin might be mutually exclusive. Displacement/replacement of one by the other as a result of their highly dynamic binding in vivo might, in principle, involve interactions between them. Chemical cross-linking and gel-filtration show that a 1:1 linker histone/HMGB1 complex is formed, which persists at physiological ionic strength, and that complex formation requires the acidic tail of HMGB1. NMR spectroscopy shows that the linker histone binds, predominantly through its basic C-terminal domain, to the acidic tail of HMGB1, thereby disrupting the interaction of the tail with the DNA-binding faces of the HMG boxes. A potential consequence of this interaction is enhanced DNA binding by HMGB1, and concomitantly lowered affinity of H1 for DNA. In a chromatin context, this might facilitate displacement of H1 by HMGB1.     

Histone H1-DNA interactions and their relation to chromatin structure and function

The belief that histone H1 interacts primarily with DNA in chromatin and much less with the protein component has led to numerous studies of artificial H1-DNA complexes. This review summarizes and discusses the data on different aspects of the interaction between the linker histone and naked DNA, including cooperativity of binding, preference for supercoiled DNA, selectivity with respect to base composition and nucleotide sequence, and effect of H1 binding on the conformation of the underlying DNA. The nature of the interaction, the structure of the complexes, and the role histone H1 exerts in chromatin are also discussed.     

Compaction of DNA in an anionic micelle environment followed by assembly into phosphatidylcholine liposomes

A difficult problem concerning the interaction of DNA with amphiphiles of opposite charge above their critical micelle concentration is the propensity for aggregation of the condensed DNA complexes. In this study, this problem was addressed by attenuating amphiphile charge density within a cholate micelle environment. The amphiphile consisted of a cationic peptide, acetyl-CWKKKPKK-amide, conjugated to dilaurylphosphatidylethanolamine. In the presence of cholate, multiple equivalents of cationic charge were required to bring about the completion of DNA condensation. At the end point of condensation, stable, soluble DNA–micelle complexes were formed, which by dynamic light scattering exhibited apparent hydrodynamic diameters between 30 and 60 nm. Aggregation, as measured by static light scattering at 90° and by turbidity, was not observed until further additions of peptide–lipid conjugate were made beyond the end point of DNA condensation. Liposome complexes containing the non-aggregated, compacted DNA were formed by adding dioleoylphosphatidylcholine followed by removing the cholate by dialysis. The resulting complexes were distributed within a narrow density range, the DNA was quantitatively assembled into the liposomes, and liposomes without DNA were not detected. Small particles were formed with a mean hydrodynamic diameter of 77 nm. The liposomal DNA showed complete retention of its supercoiled form and no detectable sensitivity to DNase (25 U/10 µg DNA, 1.5 h, 37°C). The use of an anionic, dialyzable amphiphile to attenuate charge interactions between DNA and cationic amphiphiles is a useful technology for the quantitative assembly of compacted DNA into conventional liposomes, with complete protection against nuclease activity.     

Chicken erythrocyte polynucleosomes which are soluble at physiological ionic strength and contain linker histones are highly enriched in beta-globin gene sequences.

Mature chicken erythrocyte polynucleosomes which are soluble at physiological ionic strength are enriched in beta-globin DNA sequences. Vitellogenin chromatin, which is not expressed in this tissue, is found in aggregation prone, salt insoluble chromatin. There is a direct correlation between the size of soluble fragments and the degree of globin gene enrichment, with the largest fragments being most highly enriched. The highly globin enriched (about 50 fold) polynucleosomes contain significantly elevated levels of acetylated histones H4, H2A.Z, and H2B, and ubiquitinated (prefix "u") histones H2A and H2B (with a significant relative increase of uH2B over uH2A). These polynucleosomes were complexed with histones H1 and H5 but at a lower level than that found in unfractionated chromatin.     

Differences in the binding of H1 variants to DNA. Cooperativity and linker-length related distribution

A study of the complexes formed between short linear DNA and three H1 variants, a typical somatic H1, and the extreme variants H5, from chicken erythrocytes, and spH1 from sea urchin sperm, has revealed differences between H1, H5 and spH1 that have implications for chromatin structure and folding. 1. All three histones bind cooperatively to DNA in 35 mM NaCl forming similar, but not identical, rod-like complexes. With sufficiently long DNA the complexes may be circular, circles forming more easily with H5 and spH1 than with H1. 2. The binding of H5 and spH1 to DNA is cooperative even in 5 mM NaCl, resulting in well-defined thin filaments that appear to contain two DNA molecules bridged by histone molecules. In contrast, H1 binds distributively over all the DNA molecules in 5 mM NaCl, but forms short stretches similar in appearance to the thin filaments formed with H5 and spH1. Rods appear to arise from the intertwining of regular thin filaments containing cooperatively bound histone molecules on raising the NaCl concentration to 35 mM. 3. The compositions of the rods correspond to one histone molecule for about every 47 bp (H1), 81 bp (H5) and 112 bp (spH1), suggesting average spacings of 24 bp (H1), 41 bp (H5) and 56 bp (spH1) in the component thin (double) filaments. Strikingly, these values are proportional to the linker lengths of the chromatins in which the particular H1 variant is the main or sole H1.     

Polylysine titration of rat liver chromatin fractions after DNase II digestion.

The concentration of free phosphate groups is measured in rat liver chromatin after DNase II digestion using polylysine titration. The unsheared chromatin completely precipitates at lysine/DNA phosphate ratios of 0.5 to 0.6. Digestion of the chromatin reduces the lysine/DNA phosphate ratio of complete precipitation by about 0.2 units suggesting the removal of free phosphate groups. The two chromatin fractions: MgC12 insoluble (template-inactive) and Mg12 soluble (template-active) chromatins precipitate at about the same lysine/DNA phosphate ratio. Some 15% of the MgC12 soluble chromatin remains in solution at any polylysine concentration. The removal of histone H 1 FROM THE MgC12 insoluble chromatin increases the lysine/DNA phosphate ratio by about 0.2 units suggesting that 20% of the DNA phosphate groups in nucleosomes are masked by histone H 1.     

Structure of DNA complexes with chromosomal protein HMGB1 and histone H1 in the presence of manganese ions: 1. Circular dichroism spectroscopy

Mechanisms of interaction of DNA with nonhistone chromosomal protein HMGB1 and linker histone H1 have been studied by means of circular dichroism and absorption spectroscopy. Both proteins are located in the internucleosomal regions of chromatin. It is demonstrated that the properties of DNA-protein complexes depend on the protein content and cannot be considered as a mere summing up of the effects of individual protein components. Interaction of the HMGB1 and H1 proteins is shown with DNA to be cooperative rather than competitive. Lysine-rich histone H1 facilitates the binding of HMGB1 to DNA by screening the negatively charged groups of the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA and dicarboxylic amino acid residues in the C-terminal domain of HMGB1. The observed joint action of HMGB1 and H1 stimulates DNA condensation with the formation of anisotropic DNA-protein complexes with typical ψ-type CD spectra. Structural organization of the complexes depends not only on DNA-protein interactions but also on interaction between the HMGB1 and H1 protein molecules bound to DNA. Manganese ions significantly modify the mode of interactions between components in the triple DNA-HMGB1-H1 complex. The binding of Mn²⁺ ions weakens DNA-protein interactions and strengthens protein-protein interactions, which promote DNA condensation and formation of large DNA-protein particles in solution.     

The structure of the complexes of DNA with chromosomal protein HMGB1 and histone H1 in the presence of manganese ions. I. Circular dicroism spectroscopy

The mechanisms of interaction of the non-histone chromosomal protein HMGB1 and linker histone H1 with DNA have been studied using circular dichroism and absorption spectroscopy. Both of the proteins are located in the inter-nucleosomal regions of chromatin. It was demonstrated that properties of the DNA-protein complexes depend on the protein content and can not be considered as a simple summing up of the effects of individual protein components. Interaction of HMGB1 and H1 proteins is shown to be co-operative rather than competitive. Lysine-rich histone H1 facilitates the binding of the HMGB1 with DNA by screening the negatively charged groups of the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA and dicarboxylic amino-acid residues in the C-terminal domain of the HMGB1 protein. The observed joint action of the and H1 proteins stimulates DNA condensation with formation of the anisotropic DNA-protein complexes with typical psi-type CD spectra. Structural organization of the complexes depends not only on the DNA-protein interactions, but also on the interaction between HMGB1 and H1 protein molecules bound to DNA. Manganese ions significantly modify the character of interactions between the components in the triple DNA-HMGB1-H1 complex. Binding of Mn2+ ions causes the weakening of the DNA-protein interactions and strengthening the protein-protein interactions, which promote DNA condensation and formation of large DNA-protein particles in solution.