DNA复制蛋白与复制体

有许多DNA复制蛋白是装配成一定的结构发挥作用,如引物体和复制体。在复制叉处,由DNA pol Ⅲ全酶二体、引物体和解螺旋酶装配成复制体,负责先行链和后行链的同时合成。复制中,后行链模板绕DNA pol Ⅲ全酶形成折迴环,随着复制体在复制叉处前移,后行链以5′→3′的方向合成冈崎片段。     

BRCA1蛋白参与DNA双链损伤应答

BRCA1是乳腺癌易感基因,负责维持细胞基因组的稳定性,防止调控细胞增殖和肿瘤生长的基因突变的积累。BRCA1基因蛋白产物结构复杂,功能多样,是细胞内重要的多功能蛋白,参与执行多种生理代谢过程。本主要探讨了BRCA1蛋白应答DNA双链损伤过程中所伴随的一系列信号传导的历程,阐述了连续的生理生化反应中BRCA1蛋白所发挥的作用。     

中心体异常扩增和染色体不稳定性

中心体作为主要微管组织中心在细胞周期事件中起着重要的作用。异常中心体可产生纺锤体异常,使染色体错误分离,引起染色体不稳定性和非整倍体的形成。中心体异常同染色体不稳定性一样是肿瘤细胞的一个普遍特征,并且可出现在肿瘤发生的早期阶段。中心体异常在肿瘤的发生发展演化过程中可能具有重要作用。现综述中心体的结构、功能、复制和调控,阐述肿瘤中中心体异常的表现和导致中心体扩增的可能机制及中心体扩增与染色体不稳定之间的相关性。     

WRAP53 β调控DNA损伤修复进展

WRAP53β是一种具有WD40结构域的蛋白质,在维护卡哈尔体稳定、RNA剪接、端粒延伸等方面起着至关重要的作用.WRAP53β功能紊乱与先天性角化不良、肿瘤、进行性脊髓性肌萎缩、过早老化等疾病有关.近两年研究发现WRAP53β是DNA双链断裂修复(DSBs)的一个重要支架蛋白,它以一种依赖于ATM、H2AX、MDC1的方式被募集至损伤位点并磷酸化,其WD40结构域可募集泛素E3连接酶RNF8,将DSBs位点附近的组蛋白H2AX泛素化,促进下游修复因子的聚集,引起DNA损伤后的修复作用.为此,我们重点综述了现阶段WRAP53β在DNA损伤修复方面的具体作用及机制.     

DNA损伤与细胞周期调控

DNA损伤和损伤后修复可引起细胞周期阻滞,这一事件由三个阶段组成：损伤的识别,损伤信号的传递以及细胞周期阻滞.在某些情况,这种细胞周期阻滞会失效.     

大鼠中心体蛋白家族基因的克隆及其在睾丸中的表达特征

centrin是进化上高度保守的中心体蛋白家族, 已从多种生物中克隆到其同源基因, 但基因文库中尚无大鼠centrin序列的报道. 采用RT-PCR从大鼠睾丸组织中克隆到centrin-1, -2和 -3 cDNA片段, 对其衍生的氨基酸序列进行同源性比较, 结果显示, 人、小鼠、大鼠中相应的centrin蛋白同源性很高. 采用半定量RT-PCR技术研究了它们在大鼠精子发生过程中的表达特征. 结果表明, centrin-1的表达具有睾丸组织和生精细胞特异性, 并呈现出发育阶段相关的规律, 它仅在减数分裂开始后转录, 其mRNA水平在圆形精子细胞中达到高峰. centrin-2和centrin-3在睾丸精原细胞中有高表达, 进入减数分裂后其mRNA水平迅速降低, 同时在一些体细胞中也有表达. 推测centrin-1可能在减数分裂或精子细胞变态分化过程中发挥作用, 而centrin-2, -3可能与有丝分裂有关.     

丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶与DNA损伤应答

DNA损伤应答(DNA damage response,DDR)是维持基因组稳定性的核心机制,对DDR的研究不仅有助于阐明癌症发生发展的机理,同时也为癌症治疗和抗癌新药开发提供生物学基础。蛋白质翻译后修饰,尤其是蛋白激酶介导的磷酸化修饰和蛋白磷酸酶介导的去磷酸化修饰,参与调控绝大多数的生命活动过程,包括DDR。对蛋白激酶ATM/ATR/CHK2/CHK1介导的DDR的研究已经比较透彻,但是对蛋白磷酸酶在DDR中的功能研究还有待加强和深入。比较全面地综述丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶在DDR中的功能并探讨在抗癌新药开发中的前景。     

Hela细胞端粒DNA断裂损伤

Telomeres are the repetitive G-rich DNA sequences at the end of chromosomes and shorten at each round of cell division.Besides the incomplete DNA synthesis,single and double DNA strand breaks,if not repaired, also contribute to the telomere shortening.To assess the frequency of strand breaks in proliferating Hela cells,telomere fragments were released by alkaline denaturing and electrophoresis from cells embedded in agarose,blotted onto membrane,and detected by probe specific to telomere sequence.The quantity of telomere fragments released was estimated to be less than 0.4% of the total telomere content,which corresponded to less than one break per cell.Since the mean length of the terminal restriction fragments of the cells was about 7 kbp,the fragments detected would lead to less than 19 bp in mean telomere shortening [Acta Zoologica Sinica 49(6):873-877,2003].     

组蛋白翻译后修饰与DNA损伤响应蛋白招募的调控

组蛋白翻译后修饰是细胞DNA损伤早期应答反应的重要内涵,一方面是松弛、开放染色质结构的必要分子调节事件,以便DNA损伤响应蛋白能接近DNA损伤位点;另一方面直接参与DNA损伤修复蛋白招募过程的调控。综述了在DNA损伤信号激发下,发生的组蛋白主要修饰类型,异组蛋白H2AX、H2A.Z在DNA损伤部位与组蛋白置换,及其对DNA损伤响应蛋白招募的调节作用和机制。     

ATM介导的蛋白磷酸化与DNA损伤的信号转导机制

细胞周期检定点激酶ATM蛋白属于磷酸肌醇3激酶（PI－3K）家族成员,也是哺乳动物细胞BASC高分子蛋白复合物的组成之一。ATM调整由于DNA损伤引发的DNA修复和凋亡通路,该通路主要表现为DNA损伤激活ATM激酶,ATM激酶磷酸化其下游的相应蛋白,使细胞在细胞周期关卡处停滞分裂,主要是G1－S期和G2－M期的阻滞,使损伤的DNA得以修复,当修复失败时,细胞进入凋亡进程。ATM磷酸化的蛋白质很多,如p53,cdc25A,cdc25C等,这些蛋白质对细胞周期关卡调控都非常重要,因此也就证明了ATM在细胞周期调控中的重要作用。     

PCNA泛素化修饰对DNA损伤应答途径的调控

机体细胞在多种化学物质和内外环境不断攻击下会诱发DNA损伤。为了维持基因组的稳定性,细胞内拥有一系列完善而精确的细胞应答机制来保护基因组DNA的完整性。细胞首先通过DNA损伤检测点,然后通过一系列细胞信号转导通路,启动细胞周期阻滞,进而介导细胞修复或凋亡。大量研究表明泛素化作为一种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰方式,参与调控了多种细胞生理过程。近期研究表明,DNA损伤导致复制应激可诱发PCNA的翻译后泛素化修饰,泛素化修饰的PCNA可能参与了多种DNA损伤应激过程,影响细胞选择不同的DNA损伤应答途径,导致细胞截然不同的转归。因此,更好地了解PCNA泛素化的作用及其影响DNA损伤应答通路可为我们更深入地了解人类细胞如何调控异常的DNA代谢过程和癌症的发生和发展机制提供依据。     

SUMO化修饰在DNA损伤响应中的作用

物理或化学等多种因素均可以引起DNA损伤。为维持机体基因组的稳定性,机体形成了精确完整的机制来修复损伤的／DNA。SUMO（smallubiquitin-relatedmodifier,SUMO）化修饰与其他蛋白翻译后修饰一样,具有多种生物学功能。近年来的研究表明,其在DNA损伤修复中也具有非常重要的作用。该文就DNA损伤修复、SUMO,96修饰系统及其二者关系的最新研究进展作了较为全面的介绍和总结。     

c-Abl在DNA损伤反应中的功能

非受体酪氨酸激酶c-Abl在正常生理及病理条件下具有多种生物学功能。当电离辐射、顺铂、丝裂霉素C等DNA损伤诱导剂诱导DNA损伤反应后,c-Abl可参与DNA损伤反应后的细胞周期调控、基因重组修复及细胞凋亡调控等,进而决定细胞在DNA损伤反应条件下的状态。简要介绍了c-Abl在DNA损伤反应中的作用及其进展。     

病毒感染与宿主细胞DNA损伤应答

病毒感染宿主细胞后,利用细胞内的营养物质和原料进行复制和增殖,同时能引起宿主细胞启动抗病毒免疫应答的防御机制。此外,近年来的研究还表明病毒感染能够引起宿主细胞的DNA损伤应答,该反应是细胞另一种防止病毒入侵的自我保护机制。同时发现,病毒在长期进化过程中形成了不同的机制来对抗宿主细胞的DNA损伤应答,从而消除细胞对其复制和繁殖产生的不利影响。因此,研究和阐述病毒感染后引起宿主细胞DNA损伤应答途径的机制,可使我们采取相应对策选择新的抗病毒靶点,从而有利于新型抗病毒药物的开发。     

A P53-Independent DNA Damage Response Suppresses Oncogenic Proliferation and Genome Instability

1. Download : Download high-res image (140KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

UV反应不一定等同于DNA损伤反应

哺乳类细胞遭受紫外线（UV）和其他DNA损伤剂作用后短时间内出现的基因转录诱导称为UV反应.过去认为这种反应是DNA损伤的结果．但是近年来的一些研究对这一观点提出了不少质疑,因而有必要在此讨论几个产生争议的主要问题,并对UV反应的触发机制及UV反应的功能作一些探讨     

Regulation of the DNA Damage Response by Cyclin-Dependent Kinases

The eukaryotic cell cycle comprises a series of events, whose ordering and correct progression depends on the oscillating activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), which safeguard timely duplication and segregation of the genome. Cell division is intimately connected to an evolutionarily conserved DNA damage response (DDR), which involves DNA repair pathways that reverse DNA lesions, as well as checkpoint pathways that inhibit cell cycle progression while repair occurs. There is increasing evidence that Cdks are involved in the DDR, in particular in DNA repair by homologous recombination and in activation of the checkpoint response. However, Cdks have to be carefully regulated, because even an excess of their activity can affect genome stability. In this review, we consider the physiological role of Cdks in the DDR.     

Two- and Three-Dimensional Live Cell Imaging of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious DNA lesions a cell can encounter. If left unrepaired, DSBs harbor great potential to generate mutations and chromosomal aberrations¹. To prevent this trauma from catalyzing genomic instability, it is crucial for cells to detect DSBs, activate the DNA damage response (DDR), and repair the DNA. When stimulated, the DDR works to preserve genomic integrity by triggering cell cycle arrest to allow for repair to take place or force the cell to undergo apoptosis. The predominant mechanisms of DSB repair occur through nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) (reviewed in²). There are many proteins whose activities must be precisely orchestrated for the DDR to function properly. Herein, we describe a method for 2- and 3-dimensional (D) visualization of one of these proteins, 53BP1.The p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) localizes to areas of DSBs by binding to modified histones^3,4, forming foci within 5-15 minutes⁵. The histone modifications and recruitment of 53BP1 and other DDR proteins to DSB sites are believed to facilitate the structural rearrangement of chromatin around areas of damage and contribute to DNA repair⁶. Beyond direct participation in repair, additional roles have been described for 53BP1 in the DDR, such as regulating an intra-S checkpoint, a G2/M checkpoint, and activating downstream DDR proteins^7-9. Recently, it was discovered that 53BP1 does not form foci in response to DNA damage induced during mitosis, instead waiting for cells to enter G1 before localizing to the vicinity of DSBs⁶. DDR proteins such as 53BP1 have been found to associate with mitotic structures (such as kinetochores) during the progression through mitosis¹⁰.In this protocol we describe the use of 2- and 3-D live cell imaging to visualize the formation of 53BP1 foci in response to the DNA damaging agent camptothecin (CPT), as well as 53BP1''s behavior during mitosis. Camptothecin is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that primarily causes DSBs during DNA replication. To accomplish this, we used a previously described 53BP1-mCherry fluorescent fusion protein construct consisting of a 53BP1 protein domain able to bind DSBs¹¹. In addition, we used a histone H2B-GFP fluorescent fusion protein construct able to monitor chromatin dynamics throughout the cell cycle but in particular during mitosis¹². Live cell imaging in multiple dimensions is an excellent tool to deepen our understanding of the function of DDR proteins in eukaryotic cells.     

RNF126 Quenches RNF168 Function in the DNA Damage Response

DNA damage response (DDR) is essential for maintaining genome stability and protecting cells from tumorigenesis. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications play an important role in DDR, from signaling DNA damage to mediating DNA repair. In this report, we found that the E3 ligase ring finger protein 126 (RNF126) was recruited to UV laser micro-irradiation-induced stripes in a RNF8-dependent manner. RNF126 directly interacted with and ubiquitinated another E3 ligase, RNF168. Overexpression of wild type RNF126, but not catalytically-inactive mutant RNF126 (CC229/232AA), diminished ubiquitination of H2A histone family member X (H2AX), and subsequent bleomycin-induced focus formation of total ubiquitin FK2, TP53-binding protein 1 (53BP1), and receptor-associated protein 80 (RAP80). Interestingly, both RNF126 overexpression and RNF126 downregulation compromised homologous recombination (HR)-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Taken together, our findings demonstrate that RNF126 negatively regulates RNF168 function in DDR and its appropriate cellular expression levels are essential for HR-mediated DSB repair.