DNA polymerase I acts in translesion synthesis mediated by the Y-polymerases in Bacillus subtilis

Translesion synthesis (TLS) across damaged DNA bases is most often carried out by the ubiquitous error-prone DNA polymerases of the Y-family. Bacillus subtilis encodes two Y-polymerases, Pol Y1 and Pol Y2, that mediate TLS resulting in spontaneous and ultraviolet light (UV)-induced mutagenesis respectively. Here we show that TLS is a bipartite dual polymerase process in B. subtilis, involving not only the Y-polymerases but also the A-family polymerase, DNA polymerase I (Pol I). Both the spontaneous and the UV-induced mutagenesis are abolished in Pol I mutants affected solely in the polymerase catalytic site. Physical interactions between Pol I and either of the Pol Y polymerases, as well as formation of a ternary complex between Pol Y1, Pol I and the beta-clamp, were detected by yeast two- and three-hybrid assays, supporting the model of a functional coupling between the A- and Y-family polymerases in TLS. We suggest that the Pol Y carries the synthesis across the lesion, and Pol I takes over to extend the synthesis until the functional replisome resumes replication. This key role of Pol I in TLS uncovers a new function of the A-family DNA polymerases.     

The biochemical requirements of DNA polymerase V-mediated translesion synthesis revisited

In addition to replicative DNA polymerases, cells contain specialized DNA polymerases involved in processes such as lesion tolerance, mutagenesis and immunoglobulin diversity. In Escherichia coli, DNA polymerase V (Pol V), encoded by the umuDC locus, is involved in translesion synthesis (TLS) and mutagenesis. Genetic studies have established that mutagenesis requires both UmuC and a proteolytic product of UmuD (UmuD'). In addition, RecA protein and the replication processivity factor, the beta-clamp, were genetically found to be essential co-factors for mutagenesis. Here, we have reconstituted Pol V-mediated bypass of three common replication-blocking lesions, namely the two major UV-induced lesions and a guanine adduct formed by a chemical carcinogen (G-AAF) under conditions that fulfil these in vivo requirements. Two co-factors are essential for efficient Pol V-mediated lesion bypass: (i) a DNA substrate onto which the beta-clamp is stably loaded; and (ii) an extended single-stranded RecA/ATP filament assembled downstream from the lesion site. For efficient bypass, Pol V needs to interact simultaneously with the beta-clamp and the 3' tip of the RecA filament. Formation of an extended RecA/ATP filament and stable loading of the beta-clamp are best achieved on long single-stranded circular DNA templates. In contrast to previously published data, the single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) is not absolutely required for Pol V-mediated lesion bypass provided ATP, instead of ATPgammaS, activates the RecA filament. Further discrepancies with the existing literature are explainable by the use of either inadequate DNA substrates or a UmuC fusion protein instead of native Pol V.     

Characterization of Escherichia coli UmuC active-site loops identifies variants that confer UV hypersensitivity

DNA is constantly exposed to chemical and environmental mutagens, causing lesions that can stall replication. In order to deal with DNA damage and other stresses, Escherichia coli utilizes the SOS response, which regulates the expression of at least 57 genes, including umuDC. The gene products of umuDC, UmuC and the cleaved form of UmuD, UmuD', form the specialized E. coli Y-family DNA polymerase UmuD'2C, or polymerase V (Pol V). Y-family DNA polymerases are characterized by their specialized ability to copy damaged DNA in a process known as translesion synthesis (TLS) and by their low fidelity on undamaged DNA templates. Y-family polymerases exhibit various specificities for different types of DNA damage. Pol V carries out TLS to bypass abasic sites and thymine-thymine dimers resulting from UV radiation. Using alanine-scanning mutagenesis, we probed the roles of two active-site loops composed of residues 31 to 38 and 50 to 54 in Pol V activity by assaying the function of single-alanine variants in UV-induced mutagenesis and for their ability to confer resistance to UV radiation. We find that mutations of the N-terminal residues of loop 1, N32, N33, and D34, confer hypersensitivity to UV radiation and to 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide and significantly reduce Pol V-dependent UV-induced mutagenesis. Furthermore, mutating residues 32, 33, or 34 diminishes Pol V-dependent inhibition of recombination, suggesting that these mutations may disrupt an interaction of UmuC with RecA, which could also contribute to the UV hypersensitivity of cells expressing these variants.     

Effect of SOS-induced Pol II, Pol IV, and Pol V DNA polymerases on UV-induced mutagenesis and MFD repair in Escherichia coli cells

Irradiation of organisms with UV light produces genotoxic and mutagenic lesions in DNA. Replication through these lesions (translesion DNA synthesis, TSL) in Escherichia coli requires polymerase V (Pol V) and polymerase III (Pol III) holoenzyme. However, some evidence indicates that in the absence of Pol V, and with Pol III inactivated in its proofreading activity by the mutD5 mutation, efficient TSL takes place. The aim of this work was to estimate the involvement of SOS-inducible DNA polymerases, Pol II, Pol IV and Pol V, in UV mutagenesis and in mutation frequency decline (MFD), a mechanism of repair of UV-induced damage to DNA under conditions of arrested protein synthesis. Using the argE3-->Arg(+) reversion to prototrophy system in E. coli AB1157, we found that the umuDC-encoded Pol V is the only SOS-inducible polymerase required for UV mutagenesis, since in its absence the level of Arg(+) revertants is extremely low and independent of Pol II and/or Pol IV. The low level of UV-induced Arg(+) revertants observed in the AB1157mutD5DumuDC strain indicates that under conditions of disturbed proofreading activity of Pol III and lack of Pol V, UV-induced lesions are bypassed without inducing mutations. The presented results also indicate that Pol V may provide substrates for MFD repair; moreover, we suggest that only those DNA lesions which result from umuDC-directed UV mutagenesis are subject to MFD repair.     

RecA protein of Escherichia coli has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity.

The DNA damage-inducible SOS response of Escherichia coli includes an error-prone translesion DNA replication activity responsible for SOS mutagenesis. In certain recA mutant strains, in which the SOS response is expressed constitutively, SOS mutagenesis is manifested as a mutator activity. Like UV mutagenesis, SOS mutator activity requires the products of the umuDC operon and depends on RecA protein for at least two essential activities: facilitating cleavage of LexA repressor to derepress SOS genes and processing UmuD protein to produce a fragment (UmuD') that is active in mutagenesis. To determine whether RecA has an additional role in SOS mutator activity, spontaneous mutability (tryptophan dependence to independence) was measured in a family of nine lexA-defective strains, each having a different recA allele, transformed or not with a plasmid that overproduces either UmuD' alone or both UmuD' and UmuC. The magnitude of SOS mutator activity in these strains, which require neither of the two known roles of RecA protein, was strongly dependent on the particular recA allele that was present. We conclude that UmuD'C does not determine the mutation rate independently of RecA and that RecA has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity.     

TheisfA mutation inhibits mutator activity and processing of UmuD protein inEscherichia coli recA730 strains

Further studies on theisfA mutation responsible for anti-SOS and antimutagenic activities inEscherichia coli are described. We have previously shown that theisfA mutation inhibits mutagenesis and other SOS-dependent phenomena, possibly by interfering with RecA coprotease activity. TheisfA mutation has now been demonstrated also to suppress mutator activity inE. coli recA730 andrecA730 lexA51(Def) strains that constitutively express RecA coprotease activity. We further show that the antimutator activity of theisfA mutation is related to inhibition of RecA coprotease-dependent processing of UmuD. Expression of UmuD' from plasmid pGW2122 efficiently restores UV-induced mutagenesis in therecA730 isfA strain and partially restores its mutator activity. On the other hand, overproduction of UmuD'C proteins from pGW2123 plasmid markedly enhances UV sensitivity with no restoration of mutability.     

TheisfA mutation inhibits mutator activity and processing of UmuD protein inEscherichia coli recA730 strains

Further studies on theisfA mutation responsible for anti-SOS and antimutagenic activities inEscherichia coli are described. We have previously shown that theisfA mutation inhibits mutagenesis and other SOS-dependent phenomena, possibly by interfering with RecA coprotease activity. TheisfA mutation has now been demonstrated also to suppress mutator activity inE. coli recA730 andrecA730 lexA51(Def) strains that constitutively express RecA coprotease activity. We further show that the antimutator activity of theisfA mutation is related to inhibition of RecA coprotease-dependent processing of UmuD. Expression of UmuD' from plasmid pGW2122 efficiently restores UV-induced mutagenesis in therecA730 isfA strain and partially restores its mutator activity. On the other hand, overproduction of UmuD'C proteins from pGW2123 plasmid markedly enhances UV sensitivity with no restoration of mutability.     

Roles of RecA protease and recombinase activities of Escherichia coli in spontaneous and UV-induced mutagenesis and in Weigle repair.

The RecA protein has a second, direct role in the mutagenesis of Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda in addition to its first, indirect role of inducing the SOS system by enhancing the proteolytic cleavage of the LexA repressor protein. The need for RecA protease and recombinase functions in the direct role was examined in cells containing split-phenotype RecA mutations, in the absence of LexA protein. Spontaneous mutation of E. coli (his----his+) required both the protease and recombinase activities. The mutation frequency increased with increasing RecA protease strength. In contrast, UV-induced mutation of E. coli required only the RecA protease activity. Weigle repair and mutation of UV-irradiated phage S13 required only RecA protease activity, and even weak activity was highly effective; RecA recombinase activity was not required. RecA+ protein inhibited RecA (Prtc [protease constitutive] Rec+) protein in effecting spontaneous mutation of E. coli. We discuss the nature of the direct role of the RecA protein in spontaneous mutation and in repair and mutagenesis of UV-damaged DNA and also the implications of our results for the theory that SOS-mutable cryptic lesions might be responsible for the enhanced spontaneous mutation in Prtc Rec+ strains.     

Roles of YqjH and YqjW,homologs of the Escherichia coli UmuC/DinB or Y superfamily of DNA polymerases,in stationary-phase mutagenesis and UV-induced mutagenesis of Bacillus subtilis

YqjH and YqjW are Bacillus subtilis homologs of the UmuC/DinB or Y superfamily of DNA polymerases that are involved in SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. While the functions of YqjH and YqjW in B. subtilis are still unclear, the comparisons of protein structures demonstrate that YqjH has 36% identity to E. coli DNA polymerase IV (DinB protein), and YqjW has 26% identity to E. coli DNA polymerase V (UmuC protein). In this report, we demonstrate that both YqjH and the products of the yqjW operon are involved in UV-induced mutagenesis in this bacterium. Furthermore, resistance to UV-induced damage is significantly reduced in cells lacking a functional YqjH protein. Analysis of stationary-phase mutagenesis indicates that absences of YqjH, but not that of YqjW, decreases the ability of B. subtilis to generate revertants at the hisC952 allele via this system. These data suggest a role for YqjH in the generation of at least some types of stationary-phase-induced mutagenesis.     

Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV mutator activity: genetic requirements and mutational specificity

The dinB gene of Escherichia coli is known to be involved in the untargeted mutagenesis of lambda phage. Recently, we have demonstrated that this damage-inducible and SOS-controlled gene encodes a novel DNA polymerase, DNA Pol IV, which is able to dramatically increase the untargeted mutagenesis of F' plasmid. At the amino acid level, DNA Pol IV shares sequence homologies with E. coli UmuC (DNA Pol V), Rev1p, and Rad30p (DNA polymerase eta) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human Rad30A (XPV) proteins, all of which are involved in translesion DNA synthesis. To better characterize the Pol IV-dependent untargeted mutagenesis, i.e., the DNA Pol IV mutator activity, we analyzed the genetic requirements of this activity and determined the forward mutation spectrum generated by this protein within the cII gene of lambda phage. The results indicated that the DNA Pol IV mutator activity is independent of polA, polB, recA, umuDC, uvrA, and mutS functions. The analysis of more than 300 independent mutations obtained in the wild-type or mutS background revealed that the mutator activity clearly promotes single-nucleotide substitutions as well as one-base deletions in the ratio of about 1:2. The base changes were strikingly biased for substitutions toward G:C base pairs, and about 70% of them occurred in 5'-GX-3' sequences, where X represents the base (T, A, or C) that is mutated to G. These results are discussed with respect to the recently described biochemical characteristics of DNA Pol IV.     

RecFOR proteins are essential for Pol V-mediated translesion synthesis and mutagenesis

When the replication fork moves through the template DNA containing lesions, daughter-strand gaps are formed opposite lesion sites. These gaps are subsequently filled-in either by translesion synthesis (TLS) or by homologous recombination. RecA filaments formed within these gaps are key intermediates for both of the gap-filling pathways. For instance, Pol V, the major lesion bypass polymerase in Escherichia coli, requires a functional interaction with the tip of the RecA filament. Here, we show that all three recombination mediator proteins RecFOR are needed to build a functionally competent RecA filament that supports efficient Pol V-mediated TLS in the presence of ssDNA-binding protein (SSB). A positive contribution of RecF protein to Pol V lesion bypass is demonstrated. When Pol III and Pol V are both present, Pol III imparts a negative effect on Pol V-mediated lesion bypass that is counteracted by the combined action of RecFOR and SSB. Mutations in recF, recO or recR gene abolish induced mutagenesis in E. coli.     

DNA polymerase V and RecA protein, a minimal mutasome

A hallmark of the Escherichia coli SOS response is the large increase in mutations caused by translesion synthesis (TLS). TLS requires DNA polymerase V (UmuD'2C) and RecA. Here, we show that pol V and RecA interact by two distinct mechanisms. First, pol V binds to RecA in the absence of DNA and ATP and second, through its UmuD' subunit, requiring DNA and ATP without ATP hydrolysis. TLS occurs in the absence of a RecA nucleoprotein filament but is inhibited in its presence. Therefore, a RecA nucleoprotein filament is unlikely to be required for SOS mutagenesis. Pol V activity is severely diminished in the absence of RecA or in the presence of RecA1730, a mutant defective for pol V mutagenesis in vivo. Pol V activity is strongly enhanced with RecA mutants constitutive for mutagenesis in vivo, suggesting that RecA is an obligate accessory factor that activates pol V for SOS mutagenesis.     

New phenotypes associated with mucAB: alteration of a MucA sequence homologous to the LexA cleavage site.

Most mutagenesis by UV and many chemicals in Escherichia coli requires the products of the umuDC operon or an analogous plasmid-derived operon mucAB. Activated RecA protein is also required for, or enhances, this process. MucA and UmuD proteins share homology with the LexA protein, suggesting that they might interact with the RecA protein as LexA does. We used oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis to alter a site in MucA homologous to the Ala-Gly cleavage site of LexA. The mutation, termed mucA101(Glu26), results in a change of Gly26 of MucA to Glu26. A lexA(Def) recA441 umuC122::Tn5 strain carrying a mucA101(Glu26)B+ plasmid did not exhibit the greatly increased frequency of spontaneous mutagenesis in response to RecA activation that a strain carrying a mucA+B+ plasmid did but retained a basal recA-dependent ability to confer increased spontaneous mutagenesis that was independent of the state of RecA activation. These results are consistent with a model in which RecA plays two distinct roles in mutagenesis apart from its role in the cleavage of LexA. A pBR322-derived plasmid carrying mucA+B+, but not one carrying mucA101(Glu26)B+, inhibited the UV induction of SOS genes, suggesting that MucA+ and MucA(Glu26) proteins may have different abilities to compete with LexA for activated RecA protein. The spectrum of UV-induced mutagenesis was also altered in strains carrying the mucA101(Glu26) mutation. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that activated RecA protein interacts with wild-type MucA protein, possibly promoting proteolytic cleavage, and that this interaction is responsible for facilitating certain mutagenic processes.     

Defining the position of the switches between replicative and bypass DNA polymerases

Cells contain specialized DNA polymerases that are able to copy past lesions with an associated risk of generating mutations, the major cause of cancer. Here, we reconstitute translesion synthesis (TLS) using the replicative (Pol III) and major bypass (Pol V) DNA polymerases from Escherichia coli in the presence of accessory factors. When the replicative polymerase disconnects from the template in the vicinity of a lesion, Pol V binds the blocked replication intermediate and forms a stable complex by means of a dual interaction with the tip of the RecA filament and the beta-clamp, the processivity factor donated by the blocked Pol III holoenzyme. Both interactions are required to confer to Pol V the processivity that will allow it synthesize, in a single binding event, a TLS patch long enough to support further extension by Pol III. In the absence of these accessory factors, the patch synthesized by Pol V is too short, being degraded by the Pol III-associated exonuclease activity that senses the distortion induced by the lesion, thus leading to an aborted bypass process.     

The in vivo characterization of translesion synthesis across UV-induced lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: insights into Pol zeta- and Pol eta-dependent frameshift mutagenesis

UV irradiation, a known carcinogen, induces the formation of dipyrimidine dimers with the predominant lesions being cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone adducts (6-4PPs). The relative roles of the yeast translesion synthesis DNA polymerases Pol zeta and Pol eta in UV survival and mutagenesis were examined using strains deficient in one or both polymerases. In addition, photoreactivation was used to specifically remove CPDs, thus allowing an estimate to be made of the relative contributions of CPDs vs. 6-4PPs to overall survival and mutagenesis. In terms of UV-induced mutagenesis, we focused on the +1 frameshift mutations detected by reversion of the lys2deltaA746 allele, as Pol zeta produces a distinct mutational signature in this assay. Results suggest that CPDs are responsible for most of the UV-associated toxicity as well as for the majority of UV-induced frameshift mutations in yeast. Although the presence of Pol eta generally suppresses UV-induced mutagenesis, our data suggest a role for this polymerase in generating some classes of +1 frameshifts. Finally, the examination of frameshift reversion spectra indicates a hierarchy between Pol eta and Pol zeta with respect to the bypass of UV-induced lesions.     

The role of DNA polymerase iota in UV mutational spectra

UVB (280-320 nm) and UVC (200-280 nm) irradiation generate predominantly cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and (6-4) photoproducts in DNA. CPDs are thought to be responsible for most of the UV-induced mutations. Thymine-thymine CPDs, and probably also CPDs containing cytosine, are replicated in vivo in a largely accurate manner by a DNA polymerase eta (Pol eta) dependent process. Pol eta is a DNA damage-tolerant and error-prone DNA polymerase encoded by the POLH (XPV) gene in humans. Another member of the Y family of error-prone DNA polymerases is POLI encoding DNA polymerase iota (Pol iota). In order to clarify the specific role of Pol iota in UV mutagenesis, we have used an siRNA knockdown approach in combination with a supF shuttle vector which replicates in mammalian cells, similar as we have previously done for Pol eta. Synthetic RNA duplexes were used to efficiently inhibit Pol iota expression in 293 T cells. The supF shuttle vector was irradiated with 254 nm UVC and replicated in 293 T cells in presence of anti-Pol iota siRNA. Surprisingly, there was a consistent reduction of recovered plasmid from cells with Pol iota knockdown and this was independent of UV irradiation of the plasmid. The supF mutant frequency was unchanged in the siRNA knockdown cells relative to control cells confirming that Pol iota does not play an important role in UV mutagenesis. UV-induced supF mutants were sequenced from siRNA-treated cells and controls. Neither the type of mutations nor their distribution along the supF gene were significantly different between controls and siRNA knockdown cells and were predominantly C to T and CC to TT transitions at dipyrimidine sites. These results show that Pol iota has no significant role in UV lesion bypass and mutagenesis in vivo and provides some initial data suggesting that this polymerase may be involved in replication of extrachromosomal DNA.     

Role of DNA polymerases eta, iota and zeta in UV resistance and UV-induced mutagenesis in a human cell line

Genes coding for DNA polymerases eta, iota and zeta, or for both Pol eta and Pol iota have been inactivated by homologous recombination in the Burkitt's lymphoma BL2 cell line, thus providing for the first time the total suppression of these enzymes in a human context. The UV sensitivities and UV-induced mutagenesis on an irradiated shuttle vector have been analyzed for these deficient cell lines. The double Pol eta/iota deficient cell line was more UV sensitive than the Pol eta-deficient cell line and mutation hotspots specific to the Pol eta-deficient context appeared to require the presence of Pol iota, thus strengthening the view that Pol iota is involved in UV damage translesion synthesis and UV-induced mutagenesis. A role for Pol zeta in a damage repair process at late replicative stages is reported, which may explain the drastic UV-sensitivity phenotype observed when this polymerase is absent. A specific mutation pattern was observed for the UV-irradiated shuttle vector transfected in Pol zeta-deficient cell lines, which, in contrast to mutagenesis at the HPRT locus previously reported, strikingly resembled mutations observed in UV-induced skin cancers in humans. Finally, a Pol eta PIP-box mutant (without its PCNA binding domain) could completely restore the UV resistance in a Pol eta deficient cell line, in the absence of UV-induced foci, suggesting, as observed for Pol iota in a Pol eta-deficient background, that TLS may occur without the accumulation of microscopically visible repair factories.     

Alteration of ultraviolet-induced mutagenesis in yeast through molecular modulation of the REV3 and REV7 gene expression

DNA damage can lead to mutations during replication. The damage-induced mutagenesis pathway is an important mechanism that fixes DNA lesions into mutations. DNA polymerase zeta (Pol zeta), formed by Rev3 and Rev7 protein complex, and Rev1 are components of the damage-induced mutagenesis pathway. Since mutagenesis is an important factor during the initiation and progression of human cancer, we postulate that this mutagenesis pathway may provide an inhibiting target for cancer prevention and therapy. In this study, we tested if UV-induced mutagenesis can be altered by molecular modulation of Rev3 enzyme levels using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a eukaryotic model system. Reducing the REV3 expression in yeast cells through molecular techniques was employed to mimic Pol zeta inhibition. Lower levels of Pol zeta significantly decreased UV-induced mutation frequency, thus achieving inhibition of mutagenesis. In contrast, elevating the Pol zeta level by enhanced expression of both REV3 and REV7 genes led to a approximately 3-fold increase in UV-induced mutagenesis as determined by the arg4-17 mutation reversion assays. In vivo, UV lesion bypass by Pol zeta requires the Rev1 protein. Even overexpression of Pol zeta could not alleviate the defective UV mutagenesis in the rev1 mutant cells. These observations provide evidence that the mutagenesis pathway could be used as a target for inhibiting damage-induced mutations.     

UvrD controls the access of recombination proteins to blocked replication forks

Blocked replication forks often need to be processed by recombination proteins prior to replication restart. In Escherichia coli, the UvrD repair helicase was recently shown to act at inactivated replication forks, where it counteracts a deleterious action of RecA. Using two mutants affected for different subunits of the polymerase III holoenzyme (Pol IIIh), we show here that the anti-RecA action of UvrD at blocked forks reflects two different activities of this enzyme. A defective UvrD mutant is able to antagonize RecA in cells affected for the Pol IIIh catalytic subunit DnaE. In this mutant, RecA action at blocked forks specifically requires the protein RarA (MgsA). We propose that UvrD prevents RecA binding, possibly by counteracting RarA. In contrast, at forks affected for the Pol IIIh clamp (DnaN), RarA is not required for RecA binding and the ATPase function of UvrD is essential to counteract RecA, supporting the idea that UvrD removes RecA from DNA. UvrD action on RecA is conserved in evolution as it can be performed in E. coli by the UvrD homologue from Bacillus subtilis, PcrA.