The yeast cloning vector YEp13 contains a tRNA3Leu gene that can mutate to an amber suppressor

We have shown that the yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vector YEp 13 contains, as part of its yeast chromosomal segment, a tRNA₃^Leu gene. We have also isolated and characterized a variant of YEp13, namely YEp13-a, which is capable of suppressing a variety of yeast amber-suppressible alleles in vivo. YEp13-a differs from YEp13 by a single point mutation, which changes the three-nucleotide, plus-strand sequence corresponding to the tRNA₃^Leu anticodon from the normal C-A-A to C-T-A. This nucleotide change creates a site for the restriction enzyme XbaI in the suppressor tRNA₃^Leu gene. We have taken advantage of the correlation between the suppressor mutation and the XbaI site formation, to show that the tRNA₃^Leu gene on YEp13 corresponds to the genetically characterized yeast chromosomal amber suppressor SUP53. We have also shown that SUP53 is located just centromere-distal to LEU2 on chromosome III. Finally, comparison of the DNA sequence of SUP53 and its flanking regions with the sequences of other cloned yeast tRNA₃^Leu genes has revealed considerable sequence homology in the immediate 5′-flanking regions of these genes.     

Hypermutagenesis in mutA cells is mediated by mistranslational corruption of polymerase, and is accompanied by replication fork collapse

Elevated mistranslation induces a mutator response termed translational stress‐induced mutagenesis (TSM) that is mediated by an unidentified modification of DNA polymerase III. Here we address two questions: (i) does TSM result from direct polymerase corruption, or from an indirect pathway triggered by increased protein turnover? (ii) Why are homologous recombination functions required for the expression of TSM under certain conditions, but not others? We show that replication of bacteriophage T4 in cells expressing the mutA allele of the glyV tRNA gene (Asp→Gly mistranslation), leads to both increased mutagenesis, and to an altered mutational specificity, results that strongly support mistranslational corruption of DNA polymerase. We also show that expression of mutA, which confers a recA‐dependent mutator phenotype, leads to increased lambdoid prophage induction (selectable in vivo expression technology assay), suggesting that replication fork collapse occurs more frequently in mutA cells relative to control cells. No such increase in prophage induction is seen in cells expressing alaV^Glu tRNA (Glu→Ala mistranslation), in which the mutator phenotype is recA‐independent. We propose that replication fork collapse accompanies episodic hypermutagenic replication cycles in mutA cells, requiring homologous recombination functions for fork recovery, and therefore, for mutation recovery. These findings highlight hitherto under‐appreciated links among translation, replication and recombination, and suggest that translational fidelity, which is affected by genetic and environmental signals, is a key modulator of replication fidelity.     

Termination Structures in the Escherichia coli Chromosome Replication Fork Trap

The Escherichia coli chromosome contains two opposed sets of unidirectional DNA replication pause (Ter) sites that, according to the replication fork trap theory, control the termination of chromosome replication by restricting replication fork fusion to the terminus region. In contrast, a recent hypothesis suggested that termination occurs at the dif locus instead. Using two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis, we examined DNA replication intermediates at the Ter sites and at dif in wild-type cells. Two definitive signatures of site-specific termination—specific replication fork arrest and converging replication forks—were clearly detected at Ter sites, but not at dif. We also detected a significant pause during the latter stages of replication fork convergence at Ter sites. Quantification of fork pausing at the Ter sites in both their native chromosomal context and the plasmid context further supported the fork trap model.     

Serine-inserting UAA suppression mediated by yeast tRNASer

The number of loci that give rise to serine-inserting UAA suppressors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was determined by examining over 100 of the revertants that suppressed the two UAA markers his4-1176 and leu2-1: the his4-1176 marker is suppressed by serine-inserting but not by tyrosine- or leueine-inserting suppressors and the leu2-1 marker is suppressed by all UAA suppressors. The suppressors could be assigned to one or other of the four loci: SUP16 and SUP17. which were previously known to yield serine-inserting suppressors, and SUP19 and SUP22. The chromosomal map position of SUP19 suggested that it may be allelic to the previously reported suppressor SUP20, while the SUP22 suppressor has not been described. Representatives of all of the four suppressors were found to insert serine at the UAA site in iso-1-cytochrome c from suppressed cyc1-72 strains. The degree of suppression by the serine-inserting suppressors was SUP16 > SUP17 > SUP19 > SUP22. The efficiency of suppression of each of the four serine suppressors was increased by the chromosomal mutation sal and by the cytoplasmic determinant ψ⁺. Read-through of the synthetase gene of the RNA bacteriophage Qβ in a cell-free system was used to demonstrate that tRNA^Ser from SUP16, SUP17 and SUP19 strains can translate UAA codons. In contrast, tRNA^Ser or total tRNA from SUP22 strains had no suppressing activity. The results suggest that the three loci SUP16, SUP17 and SUP19 encode iso-accepting species of tRNA^Ser, and that the UAA suppression is mediated by mutationally altered tRNA molecules. The mechanism of SUP22 suppression remains unknown.     

Isolation of transfer RNA isoacceptors by chromatography on dihydroxyboryl-substituted cellulose,polyacrylamide, and glass

Polyacrylamide and porous-glass supports containing the dihydroxyborylphenyl group can be prepared by a method similar to that used in the synthesis of N-[N′-(m-dihydroxyborylphenyl)succinamyl]aminoethylcellulose. The reaction of aminoethylpolyacrylamide or amino-substituted glass with N-(m-dihydroxyborylphenyl)succinamic acid in the presence of N-cyclohexyl-N′-β-(4-methyl-morpholinium) ethylcarbodiimide yields products which, together with the cellulose derivative, are all capable of binding tRNA dissolved in buffers at pH 8.7. The demonstration that bound tRNA can be released with sorbitol solutions or with low pH buffers, together with studies on the binding of tRNA species that contain chemically modified 3′-terminals, indicate that the predominant binding mechanism consists of cyclic complex formation between the immobilized dihydroxyboryl groups and the 3′-terminal cis-diol groups of the tRNA molecules. Aminoacylated tRNA does not bind under the conditions necessary to bind tRNA and this permits the isolation of specific tRNA isoacceptors. The purification of tRNA^Phe and the partial purification of tRNA^Glu and tRNA^Trp are described.     

FANCD2 maintains replication fork stability during misincorporation of the DNA demethylation products 5-hydroxymethyl-2’-deoxycytidine and 5-hydroxymethyl-2’-deoxyuridine

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare hereditary disorder caused by mutations in any one of the FANC genes. FA cells are mainly characterized by extreme hypersensitivity to interstrand crosslink (ICL) agents. Additionally, the FA proteins play a crucial role in concert with homologous recombination (HR) factors to protect stalled replication forks. Here, we report that the 5-methyl-2’-deoxycytidine (5mdC) demethylation (pathway) intermediate 5-hydroxymethyl-2’-deoxycytidine (5hmdC) and its deamination product 5-hydroxymethyl-2’-deoxyuridine (5hmdU) elicit a DNA damage response, chromosome aberrations, replication fork impairment and cell viability loss in the absence of FANCD2. Interestingly, replication fork instability by 5hmdC or 5hmdU was associated to the presence of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) on chromatin, being both phenotypes exacerbated by olaparib treatment. Remarkably, Parp1^−/− cells did not show any replication fork defects or sensitivity to 5hmdC or 5hmdU, suggesting that retained PARP1 at base excision repair (BER) intermediates accounts for the observed replication fork defects upon 5hmdC or 5hmdU incorporation in the absence of FANCD2. We therefore conclude that 5hmdC is deaminated in vivo to 5hmdU, whose fixation by PARP1 during BER, hinders replication fork progression and contributes to genomic instability in FA cells.Subject terms: DNA damage and repair, DNA replication