Mutual interactions between the SUMO and ubiquitin systems: a plea of no contest

Posttranslational modification by ubiquitin and SUMO is recognized as an effective means of controlling the stability, localization or activity of intracellular proteins, thereby contributing to the regulation of many biological processes. Over the past few years, it has become apparent that the two modification systems often communicate and jointly affect the properties of common substrate proteins, in some cases by being targeted to the same site. However, although SUMO and ubiquitin might have very different effects on a given target, their actions can rarely be explained by simple competition. This article gives an overview of target proteins that can serve as substrates for both SUMO and ubiquitin to highlight the diversity of regulatory strategies that result from the crosstalk between the two modification systems.     

The p66 and p12 subunits of DNA polymerase delta are modified by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins

Modification by ubiquitin-like proteins is now known to be important for the functions of many proteins involved in DNA replication and repair. We have investigated the modification of human DNA polymerase delta by ubiquitin and SUMO proteins. We find that while the p125 and p50 subunits were not modified, the p12 subunit is ubiquitinated and the p66 subunit can be modified by ubiquitin and SUMO3. We show that levels of p12 are regulated by the proteasome, either directly or indirectly, through a mechanism that is not dependent upon p12 ubiquitination. We have mapped two sites of SUMO3-specific modification on the p66 subunit. SUMOylation by SUMO3 but not SUMO2 is unusual: their level of homology is so high that they are normally classified as variants of the same protein. However, our findings show that these two proteins can be distinguished in vivo and may have specific functions.     

RNF4 interacts with both SUMO and nucleosomes to promote the DNA damage response

The post‐translational modification of DNA repair and checkpoint proteins by ubiquitin and small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) critically orchestrates the DNA damage response (DDR). The ubiquitin ligase RNF4 integrates signaling by SUMO and ubiquitin, through its selective recognition and ubiquitination of SUMO‐modified proteins. Here, we define a key new determinant for target discrimination by RNF4, in addition to interaction with SUMO. We identify a nucleosome‐targeting motif within the RNF4 RING domain that can bind DNA and thereby enables RNF4 to selectively ubiquitinate nucleosomal histones. Furthermore, RNF4 nucleosome‐targeting is crucially required for the repair of TRF2‐depleted dysfunctional telomeres by 53BP1‐mediated non‐homologous end joining.     

Structural basis for E2-mediated SUMO conjugation revealed by a complex between ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and RanGAP1

E2 enzymes catalyze attachment of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins to lysine residues directly or through E3-mediated reactions. The small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO regulates nuclear transport, stress response, and signal transduction in eukaryotes and is essential for cell-cycle progression in yeast. In contrast to most ubiquitin conjugation, the SUMO E2 enzyme Ubc9 is sufficient for substrate recognition and lysine modification of known SUMO targets. Crystallographic analysis of a complex between mammalian Ubc9 and a C-terminal domain of RanGAP1 at 2.5 A reveals structural determinants for recognition of consensus SUMO modification sequences found within SUMO-conjugated proteins. Structure-based mutagenesis and biochemical analysis of Ubc9 and RanGAP1 reveal distinct motifs required for substrate binding and SUMO modification of p53, IkappaBalpha, and RanGAP1.     

Structural basis for regulation of poly‐SUMO chain by a SUMO‐like domain of Nip45

Post‐translational modification by small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) provides an important regulatory mechanism in diverse cellular processes. Modification of SUMO has been shown to target proteins involved in systems ranging from DNA repair pathways to the ubiquitin‐proteasome degradation system by the action of SUMO‐targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs). STUbLs recognize target proteins modified with a poly‐SUMO chain through their SUMO‐interacting motifs (SIMs). STUbLs are also associated with RENi family proteins, which commonly have two SUMO‐like domains (SLD1 and SLD2) at their C terminus. We have determined the crystal structures of SLD2 of mouse RENi protein, Nip45, in a free form and in complex with a mouse E2 sumoylation enzyme, Ubc9. While Nip45 SLD2 shares a β‐grasp fold with SUMO, the SIM interaction surface conserved in SUMO paralogues does not exist in SLD2. Biochemical data indicates that neither tandem SLDs or SLD2 of Nip45 bind to either tandem SIMs from either mouse STUbL, RNF4 or to those from SUMO‐binding proteins, whose interactions with SUMO have been well characterized. On the other hand, Nip45 SLD2 binds to Ubc9 in an almost identical manner to that of SUMO and thereby inhibits elongation of poly‐SUMO chains. This finding highlights a possible role of the RENi proteins in the modulation of Ubc9‐mediated poly‐SUMO formation. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

SUMO/sentrin: protein modifiers regulating important cellular functions.

Regulation of protein functions can be achieved by posttranslational protein modifications. One of the most studied modifications has been conjugation to ubiquitin, which mainly targets substrate proteins for degradation by the 26 S proteasome. Recently, SUMO/sentrin, a ubiquitin-like protein has been characterized. This evolutionary conserved protein is conjugated to specific proteins in a way similar, but not identical, to ubiquitin and seems also to be involved in the regulation of protein localization or function. An increasing number of SUMO/sentrin substrates are currently described. We focus here on three major substrates of modification by SUMO: RanGAP1, PML, and IkappaBalpha proteins. These different examples illustrate how SUMO conjugation may be involved in the control of the level of critical proteins within the cell or in the modulation of subcellular localization and nucleocytoplasmic trafficking.     

SUMO protein modification

SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) family proteins are not only structurally but also mechanistically related to ubiquitin in that they are posttranslationally attached to other proteins. As ubiquitin, SUMO is covalently linked to its substrates via amide (isopeptide) bonds formed between its C-terminal glycine residue and the epsilon-amino group of internal lysine residues. The enzymes involved in the reversible conjugation of SUMO are similar to those mediating the ubiquitin conjugation. Since its discovery in 1996, SUMO has received a high degree of attention because of its intriguing and essential functions, and because its substrates include a variety of biomedically important proteins such as tumor suppressor p53, c-jun, PML and huntingtin. SUMO modification appears to play important roles in diverse processes such as chromosome segregation and cell division, DNA replication and repair, nuclear protein import, protein targeting to and formation of certain subnuclear structures, and the regulation of a variety of processes including the inflammatory response in mammals and the regulation of flowering time in plants.     

SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases

Covalent posttranslational modification with SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) modulates functions of a wide range of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Sumoylation affects the activity, interaction properties, subcellular localization and the stability of its substrate proteins. The recent discovery of a novel class of ubiquitin ligases (E3), termed ULS (E3-S) or STUbL, that recognize sumoylated proteins, links SUMO modification to the ubiquitin/proteasome system. Here we review recent insights into the properties and function of these ligases and their roles in regulating sumoylated proteins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Ubiquitin–Proteasome System. Guest Editors: Thomas Sommer and Dieter H. Wolf.     

Dual Recruitment of Cdc48 (p97)-Ufd1-Npl4 Ubiquitin-selective Segregase by Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier Protein (SUMO) and Ubiquitin in SUMO-targeted Ubiquitin Ligase-mediated Genome Stability Functions

Protein modification by SUMO and ubiquitin critically impacts genome stability via effectors that "read" their signals using SUMO interaction motifs or ubiquitin binding domains, respectively. A novel mixed SUMO and ubiquitin signal is generated by the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase (STUbL), which ubiquitylates SUMO conjugates. Herein, we determine that the "ubiquitin-selective" segregase Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 also binds SUMO via a SUMO interaction motif in Ufd1 and can thus act as a selective receptor for STUbL targets. Indeed, we define key cooperative DNA repair functions for Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 and STUbL, thereby revealing a new signaling mechanism involving dual recruitment by SUMO and ubiquitin for Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 functions in maintaining genome stability.     

SUMO modification of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K

Post-translational modification with small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) alters the function of many proteins, but the molecular mechanisms and consequences of this modification are still poorly defined. During a screen for novel SUMO1 targets, we identified the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K (Hip2). SUMO attachment severely impairs E2-25K ubiquitin thioester and unanchored ubiquitin chain formation in vitro. Crystal structures of E2-25K(1-155) and of the E2-25K(1-155)-SUMO conjugate (E2-25K(*)SUMO) indicate that SUMO attachment interferes with E1 interaction through its location on the N-terminal helix. The SUMO acceptor site in E2-25K, Lys14, does not conform to the consensus site found in most SUMO targets (PsiKXE), and functions only in the context of an alpha-helix. In contrast, adjacent SUMO consensus sites are modified only when in unstructured peptides. The demonstration that secondary structure elements are part of SUMO attachment signals could contribute to a better prediction of SUMO targets.     

HIF-1α的泛素化和SUMO化修饰

低氧诱导因子-1（hypoxia-inducible factor-1,HIF-1）是异二聚体的转录因子,由氧敏感的α亚基和在细胞内稳定表达的β亚基组成,在细胞低氧应答反应中起核心作用,能调节100多种涉及低氧应激下细胞适应和存活的靶基因.泛素是一种由76个氨基酸残基组成的保守性多肽,广泛存在真核生物中.SUMO是泛素样蛋白家族成员,分子量约为12 kD的小蛋白,从拟南芥到人类普遍存在.泛素和SUMO可共价结合许多靶底物蛋白,对其进行翻译后修饰,该过程分别称为泛素化与SUMO化.近来研究显示,HIF-1α的翻译后修饰如泛素化、SUMO化可调节其的稳定性,从而改变HIF 1α的转录激活活性.本文主要就HIF-1α泛素化及SUMO化修饰等问题作一综述.     

Cytoplasmic sumoylation by PIAS-type Siz1-SUMO ligase

SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier), a 12 kDa protein with distant similarity to ubiquitin, covalently binds to many proteins in eukaryotic cells. In contrast to ubiquitination, which mainly regulates proteasome-dependent degradation and protein sorting, sumoylation is known to regulate assembly and disassembly of protein complexes, protein localization and stability, and so on. SUMO is primarily localized to the nucleus, and many SUMO substrates are nuclear proteins involved in DNA transaction. However, certain roles of SUMO conjugates have been shown outside the nucleus. Particularly in budding yeast, SUMO is also localized to the bud-neck in a cell cycle-dependent manner. The first and prominent SUMO substrates are septins, evolutionally conserved proteins required for cytokinesis in yeast. Recent analysis of human septin structure would greatly facilitate the study of the functions of these SUMO conjugates. SUMO modification of septins is regulated by cell cycle-dependent nuclear transport of PIAS-type Siz1 (SUMO E3) and Ulp1 desumoylation enzyme in yeast. Domains outside the SUMO-ligase core (SP-RING) of Siz1 ensure its regulations. Furthermore, newly discovered ubiquitin ligases that specifically recognize poly-SUMO conjugates could lead to degradation of SUMO conjugates. Thus, protein modifications seem to be regulated in an unexpectedly complex manner. In this review, we focus on various regulations in yeast septin sumoylation and discuss its possible functions.     

SUMO playing tag with ubiquitin

In addition to being structurally related, the protein modifiers ubiquitin and SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier), share a multitude of functional interrelations. These include the targeting of the same attachment sites in certain substrates, and SUMO-dependent ubiquitylation in others. Notably, several cellular processes, including the targeting of repair machinery to DNA damage sites, require the sequential sumoylation and ubiquitylation of distinct substrates. Some proteins promote both modifications. By contrast, the activity of some enzymes that control either sumoylation or ubiquitylation is regulated by the respective other modification. In this review, we summarize recent findings regarding intersections between SUMO and ubiquitin that influence genome stability and cell growth and which are relevant in pathogen resistance and cancer treatment.     

蛋白质的类泛素化修饰

SUMO(small ubiquitin-related modifier)是一类重要的类泛素蛋白,在生物进化过程中高度保守,其三维结构及生化修饰过程与泛素类似,但该两类蛋白质修饰的生物学意义却不尽相同。SUMO化修饰作为一种重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰,广泛参与细胞活动的各个方面,且SUMO化修饰异常与许多人类重大疾病密切相关。     

Experimental comparison of energy landscape features of ubiquitin family proteins

Small ubiquitin-related modifiers (SUMO1 and SUMO2) are ubiquitin family proteins, structurally similar to ubiquitin, differing in terms of their amino acid sequence and functions. Therefore, they provide a great platform for investigating sequence-structure-stability-function relationship. Here, we used chemical denaturation in comparing the folding-unfolding pathways of the SUMO proteins with their structural homologue ubiquitin (UF45W-pseudo wild-type [WT] tryptophan variant) with structurally analogous tryptophan mutations (SUMO1 [S1F66W], SUMO2 [S2F62W]). Equilibrium denaturation studies report that ubiquitin is the most stable protein among the three. The observed denaturant-dependent folding rates of SUMOs are much lower than ubiquitin and primarily exhibit a two-state folding pathway unlike ubiquitin, which has a kinetic folding intermediate. We hypothesize that, as SUMO proteins start off as slow folders, they avoid stabilizing their folding intermediates and the presence of which might further slow-down their folding rates. The denaturant-dependent unfolding of ubiquitin is the fastest, followed by SUMO2, and slowest for SUMO1. However, the spontaneous unfolding rate constant is the lowest for ubiquitin (~40 times), and similar for SUMOs. This correlation between thermodynamic stability and kinetic stability is achieved by having different unfolding transition state positions with respect to the solvent-accessible surface area, as quantified by the Tanford β _u values: ubiquitin (0.42) > SUMO2 (0.20) > SUMO1 (0.16). The results presented here highlight the unique energy landscape features which help in optimizing the folding-unfolding rates within a structurally homologous protein family.     

Phosphorylation of SUMO-1 occurs in vivo and is conserved through evolution

Protein dynamics is regulated by an elaborate interplay between different post-translational modifications. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) are small proteins that are covalently conjugated to target proteins with important functional consequences. One such modifier is SUMO, which mainly modifies nuclear proteins. SUMO contains a unique N-terminal arm not present in ubiquitin and other Ubls, which functions in the formation of SUMO polymers. Here, we unambiguously show that serine 2 of the endogenous SUMO-1 N-terminal protrusion is phosphorylated in vivo using very high mass accuracy mass spectrometry at both the MS and the MS/MS level and complementary fragmentation techniques. Strikingly, we detected the same phosphorylation in yeast, Drosophila and human cells, suggesting an evolutionary conserved function for this modification. The nearly identical human SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 isoforms differ in serine 2; thus, only SUMO-3 could be phosphorylated at this position. Our finding that SUMO can be modified may point to an additional level of complexity through modifying a protein-modifier.