Aberrant promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene may be correlated with colorectal carcinogenesis: a meta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis of cohort studies to evaluate the potential role of RASSF1A promoter methylation in colorectal carcinogenesis. A range of electronic databases were searched: PubMed (1966–2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), EMBASE (1980–2013), CINAHL (1982–2013), Web of Science (1945–2013) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1982–2013) without language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. Crude odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was calculated. Eleven clinical cohort studies with a total of 1,505 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that met all inclusion criteria were included in our meta-analysis. The results of our meta-analysis revealed that the frequency of RASSF1A promoter methylation was strongly correlated with clinical stage (OR = 1.69, 95 % CI 1.16–2.44, P = 0.006), histological grade (OR = 1.92, 95 % CI 1.22–3.04, P = 0.005) and distant metastasis (OR = 2.59, 95 % CI 1.46–4.60, P = 0.037) of CRC patients. However, we observed no positive correlations of RASSF1A promoter methylation with gender (OR = 1.04, 95 % CI 0.74–1.46, P = 0.842), age (OR = 1.70, 95 % CI 0.98–2.93, P = 0.057) and lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.65, 95 % CI 0.87–3.14, P = 0.127) of CRC patients. Further subgroup analysis by ethnicity demonstrated that RASSF1A promoter methylation was correlated with clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients among Asians (clinical stage: OR = 2.55, 95 % CI 1.55–4.20, P < 0.001; histological grade: OR = 2.70, 95 % CI 1.44–5.06, P = 0.002; lymph node metastasis: OR = 4.09, 95 % CI 1.49–11.26, P = 0.006; distant metastasis: OR = 5.38, 95 % CI 1.73–16.70, P = 0.004), but not among Caucasians and Africans (all P > 0.05). Our meta-analysis has shown positive correlations between aberrant promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene and clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients, especially among Asians.     

Genetic polymorphisms in VDR,ESR1 and ESR2 genes may contribute to susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis

We conducted this meta-analysis of relevant case–control studies to investigate the relationships between genetic polymorphisms in VDR, ESR1 and ESR2 genes to the susceptibility of Parkinson’s disease (PD). A search on electronic databases without any language restrictions was conducted: MEDLINE (1966–2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), EMBASE (1980–2013), CINAHL (1982–2013), Web of Science (1945–2013) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (1982–2013). Meta-analysis was performed using the STATA statistical software. Crude odds ratio (OR) with their 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was calculated. Fourteen case–control studies with a total of 3,689 PD patients and 4,627 healthy subjects were included in our meta-analysis. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrated that the VDR genetic polymorphisms might be closely related to increased risks of PD (allele model: OR = 1.18, 95 % CI 1.09–1.29, P < 0.001; dominant model: OR = 1.37, 95 % CI 1.16–1.63, P < 0.001; respectively), especially for the polymorphisms rs7976091 and rs10735810. Our findings also illustrated that ESR1 genetic polymorphisms might increase the risk of PD (allele model: OR = 1.56, 95 % CI 1.17–2.07, P = 0.002; recessive model: OR = 1.93, 95 % CI 1.33–2.80, P < 0.001; homozygous model: OR = 1.35, 95 % CI 1.02–1.79, P = 0.038; heterozygous model: OR = 2.04, 95 % CI 1.36–3.07, P = 0.001; respectively), especially for the polymorphisms rs2234693 and rs9340799. Furthermore, we found significant correlations of ESR2 genetic polymorphisms with the risk of PD (allele model: OR = 1.78, 95 % CI 1.19–2.67, P = 0.005; recessive model: OR = 1.93, 95 % CI 1.15–3.27, P = 0.014; homozygous model: OR = 1.77, 95 % CI 1.09–2.89, P = 0.022; heterozygous model: OR = 1.88, 95 % CI 1.08–3.27, P = 0.025; respectively), especially for the rs1256049 polymorphism. Our meta-analysis suggests that genetic polymorphisms in VDR, ESR1 and ESR2 genes may contribute to increased risks for PD.     

Role of RASSF1A promoter methylation in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies

We carried out the current meta-analysis aiming to comprehensively assess the potential role of RASSF1A aberrant promoter methylation in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A range of electronic databases were searched: Web of Science (1945–2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), PubMed (1966–2013), EMBASE (1980–2013), CINAHL (1982–2013) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1982–2013) without language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. Crude risk difference (RD) with their 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was calculated. In the present meta-analysis, 21 clinical cohort studies with a total of 1,205 HCC patients were included. The results of our meta-analysis illustrated that the frequency of RASSF1A promoter methylation in cancer tissues were significantly higher than those of normal, adjacent and benign tissues (cancer tissues vs. normal tissues: RD = 0.63, 95 % CI 0.53–0.73, P < 0.001; cancer tissues vs. adjacent tissues: RD = 0.43, 95 % CI 0.33–0.53, P < 0.001; cancer tissues vs. benign tissues: RD = 0.48, 95 % CI 038–0.58, P < 0.001; respectively). Further subgroup by ethnicity demonstrated that RASSF1A aberrant promoter methylation was correlated with the pathogenesis of HCC among both Asians and Caucasians (all P < 0.05). The current meta-analysis suggests that RASSF1A aberrant promoter methylation may be implicated in the pathogenesis of HCC. Thus, detection of RASSF1A promoter methylation may be a helpful and valuable biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of HCC.     

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Stent and Conventional Therapies in Coronary Heart Disease Patients with In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to compare therapeutic outcome/safety of drug-eluting stent (DES) and conventional in-stent restenosis (ISR) treatments. We browsed through large volume of clinical data by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, and EBSCO databases. In this study, 11 randomized controlled trials, 17 non-randomized controlled trials, 6,330 patients, and 6,662 lesions were included. Clinical and coronary angiography follow-up for 6–16 months was included. The major outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We found that DES showed advantage in TLR (OR = 0.46; 95 % CI: 0.34, 0.62; P < 0.00001), MACE (OR = 0.51; 95 % CI: 0.34, 0.77; P = 0.001), Late Lumen Loss (IV = ?0.30; 95 % CI: ?0.44, ?0.15; P < 0.0001), stenosis of lumen diameter (OR = ?17.45; 95 % CI: ?23.69, ?11.21; P < 0.00001), and restenosis (OR = 0.26; 95 % CI: 0.17, 0.40; P < 0.00001) over conventional ISR treatment. Regarding cardiac death (OR = 0.80; 95 % CI: 0.55, 1.17; P = 0.25), myocardial infarction (OR = 1.00;95 %CI: 0.66, 1.51; P = 1.00) and late thrombosis (OR = 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.42, 1.17; P = 0.18), there was no significant difference between different treatments. We, therefore, concluded that in treating percutaneous coronary intervention–ISR, DES was more effective in reducing incidence of TLR, MACE, and restenosis, and decreasing severity of late lumen loss/stenosis of lumen diameter compared with bare metal stent, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, intracoronary brachytherapy, and cutting balloon treatments. There was no significant difference between DES and conventional therapy for ISR. As suggested by current statistical analysis, DES after ISR did not involve a higher incidence of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and thrombosis.     

Significant association of glutathione S-transferase T1 null genotype with esophageal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Recent studies on the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphism and risk of esophageal cancer showed inconclusive results. To clarify this possible association, we conducted a meta-analysis of published studies. Data were collected from the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). The odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was used to assess the strength of this association. We summarized the data on the association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of esophageal cancer in the overall population, and performed subgroup analyses by ethnicity. Finally, a total of 24 independent studies including a total of 7,801 subjects (2,965 cases and 4,836 controls) were eligible for meta-analysis. In the overall analysis, there was no significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and esophageal cancer risk (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI 0.99–1.33, P = 0.067). However, meta-analysis of adjusted ORs showed a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of esophageal cancer (OR = 1.30, 95 % CI 1.08–1.56, P = 0.005). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed there was an obvious association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of esophageal cancer in East Asians (OR = 1.24, 95 % CI 1.10–1.39, P < 0.001), but not in Caucasians (OR = 0.89, 95 % CI 0.71–1.11, P = 0.300). There was no obvious risk of publication bias in this meta-analysis (Egger’s test, P = 0.784). This meta-analysis demonstrates that GSTT1 null genotype is independently associated with increased risk of esophageal cancer, and a race-specific effect may exist in this association.     

The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and tumor risk: evidence from 134 case–control studies

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is an important enzyme involved in folate metabolism, which is essential for DNA synthesis and methylation. Genetic variations in the MTHFR gene seem to contribute to a decreased activity of MTHFR, ultimately confer increased susceptibility to cancer. As the most extensively studied polymorphism, MTHFR C677T polymorphism was shown to contribute to cancer susceptibility but the results were inconsistent. The authors performed a meta-analysis including 134 studies (46,207 cases and 69,160 controls) to address the issue. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association. Overall, a significant elevated risk of cancer was associated with the MTHFR C677T polymorphism in T-allele versus C-allele comparison (OR = 1.06, 95 % CI 1.02–1.11, P _{heterogeneity}  < 0.001), homozygote model (OR = 1.08, 95 % CI 1.01–1.17, P _{heterogeneity}  < 0.001) and dominant model (OR = 1.05, 95 % CI 1.00–1.10, P _{heterogeneity}  < 0.001). In the stratified analyses, significantly increased cancer risks were indicated among Asians in all genetic models except for heterozygote model. Further analysis revealed that C677T was significantly associated with an increased risk of esophageal and stomach cancer. This meta-analysis supports an association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and increased risk of esophageal and stomach cancer, especially among Asians. Additionally, more high-quality studies and that the covariates responsible for heterogeneity should be controlled to obtain a more conclusive response about the function of MTHFR C677T in cancer.     

Relationships between PON1 Q192R polymorphism and clinical outcome of antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis was performed to assess the relationships between the PON1 Q192R (rs662 T>C) polymorphism and the clinical outcome of antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A range of electronic databases were searched: Web of Science (1945–2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), PubMed (1966–2013), EMBASE (1980–2013), CINAHL (1982–2013) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1982–2013) without language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. The crude odds ratio (OR) with their 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Six clinical cohort studies with a total number of 5,189 patients undergoing PCI for coronary heart disease were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that the PON1 Q192R polymorphism was correlated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI (C allele vs. T allele: OR = 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04–1.43, P = 0.014; CT+CC vs. TT: OR = 1.38, 95 % CI 1.03–1.86, P = 0.029; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.45, 95 % CI 1.05–1.99, P = 0.024; respectively), especially among Asians. Furthermore, we found significantly positive correlations between the PON1 Q192R polymorphism and the incidence of stent thrombosis in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI (C allele vs. T allele: OR = 1.42, 95 % CI 1.08–1.87, P = 0.011; CT+CC vs. TT: OR = 1.93, 95 % CI 1.01–3.67, P = 0.046; CC vs. TT: OR = 2.18, 95 % CI 1.09–4.35, P = 0.027; respectively). Our meta-analysis of clinical cohort studies provides evidence that the PON1 Q192R polymorphism may increase the risk of MACE and stent thrombosis in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI.     

Quantitative analysis of the association between interleukin-10 1082A/G polymorphism and susceptibility to sepsis

There are some epidemiological studies investigating the association between interleukin-10 (IL-10) 1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility reporting conflicting findings. Our work tried to further quantitatively assess the association of the IL-10 1082A/G polymorphism with sepsis susceptibility through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of eleven studies with 2,528 subjects were finally included into the meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were calculated with random-effects model or fixed-effects model based on the heterogeneity among the included studies. Meta-analysis of all 11 studies showed that there was an obvious association between IL-10 1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility under the allele comparison model (G vs A) and the codominant model (GG vs AA) (for G vs A: OR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.72–0.96, P = 0.011; for GG vs AA: OR = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.47–0.96, P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that there was an obvious association between IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility in Asians under three comparison models (for G vs A: OR = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.62–0.91, P = 0.004; for GG vs AA: OR = 0.39, 95 % CI 0.21–0.73, P = 0.003; for GG vs AA/AG: OR = 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14–0.92, P = 0.032), but there was no similar association in Caucasians under all four comparison models. Our meta-analysis reveals that the IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism has an association with the susceptibility to sepsis in Asian populations. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism on sepsis susceptibility in Caucasians.     

The Cdx-2 polymorphism in the VDR gene is associated with increased risk of cancer: a meta-analysis

The Cdx-2 polymorphism in VDR gene has been extensively investigated for association with cancer risk, however, results of different studies have been inconsistent. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship of the Cdx-2 polymorphism in VDR and cancer risk by meta-analysis. All eligible case–control studies were searched in Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases. Odds ratios (OR) with the 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the association. A total of 12,906 cases and 13,700 controls in 18 case–control studies were included. The results indicated that the AA homozygote carriers had a 16 % increased risk of cancer, when compared with the homozygote GG and heterozygote AG (OR = 1.16, 95 % CI 1.05–1.29 for AA vs. GG+AG). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant elevated risks were associated with AA homozygote carriers in Caucasians (OR = 1.16, 95 % CI 1.01–1.33, and P = 0.04) and African Americans (OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.07–1.61, and P = 0.01). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, the polymorphism was associated with increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI 1.04–1.46, and P = 0.02). This meta-analysis suggested that the Cdx-2 polymorphism of VDR gene would be a risk factor for cancer. To further evaluate gene-to-gene and gene-to-environmental interactions between polymorphisms of VDR gene and cancer risk, more studies with large groups of patients are required.     

Association of TGF-β1 +869C/T promoter polymorphism with susceptibility to autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis

Many case–control studies have investigated the role of TGF-β1 gene +869C/T promoter polymorphism in autoimmune diseases, but the results are inconsistent. To clarify this point, we performed a meta-analysis based on all available studies in Pubmed, Elsevier Science Direct, Google Searching, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated to estimate the strength of the association. A fixed or random effects model was used on the basis of heterogeneity. A total of 21 papers including 2,693 cases and 3,036 controls were considered in the current meta-analysis. These studies encompass two ankylosing spondylitis (AS), eight rheumatoid arthritis (RA), four systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and seven systemic sclerosis (SSc). The results showed that TGF-β1 +869C/T promoter polymorphism were associated with susceptibility to RA (CC vs. TT: OR = 0.65, 95 % CI = 0.48–0.88, P = 0.005; CC vs. CT + TT: OR = 0.56, 95 % CI = 0.45–0.69, P = 0.000; C vs. T: OR = 0.81, 95 % CI = 0.71–0.93, P = 0.003). When stratified by race, significant association was observed only in Asian population. However, we failed to reveal the association between this gene promoter polymorphism and AS, SLE, and SSc. Therefore, this meta-analysis suggests a possible association between TGF-β1 +869C/T promoter polymorphism and RA, especially in Asian population.     

A meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of breast cancer

Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is one of the important mutant sites for the cancer risk at present. The conclusions of the published reports on the relationship between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer are still debated. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between GSTP1 and the risk of breast cancer. The association reports were identified from PubMed and Cochrane Library, and eligible studies were included and synthesized using meta-analysis method. 35 investigations were included into this meta-analysis for the association of GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility, consisting of 40,347 subjects (18,665 patients with breast cancer and 21,682 controls). The association between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk was not found for overall population, Caucasians and Africans. Interestingly, the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of breast cancer in Asians (G allele: OR = 1.10, 95 % CI: 1.04–1.17, P = 0.001; GG genotype: OR = 1.36, 95 % CI: 1.14–1.62, P = 0.0008; AA genotype: OR = 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.85–0.98, P = 0.02). Furthermore, the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of breast cancer for the analysis of the controls from hospital. In conclusion, GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism is associated with the breast cancer susceptibility in Asians. However, more studies on the relationship between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer should be performed in further.     

Significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and susceptibility to pancreatic cancer

Many studies have investigated the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphism and risk for pancreatic cancer, but those studies have yielded contradictory findings on the association. We performed a comprehensive search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between GSTT1 polymorphism and susceptibility to pancreatic cancer by calculating the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs). Eight studies involving a total of 4,437 individuals were included. Overall, significantly increased pancreatic cancer risk was associated with GSTT1 null genotype when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (random effects OR = 1.61, 95 % CI 1.06–2.44; P = 0.025). Significantly increased risk of pancreatic cancer was also found for GSTT1 null genotype in Asians when stratified by ethnicity (fixed effects OR = 2.67, 95 % CI 1.74–4.09; P < 0.001). The findings demonstrate that GSTT1 null genotype have a modest effect on the genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer, and GSTT1 null genotype is associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer.     

The association between CD14 gene C-260T polymorphism and coronary heart disease risk: a meta-analysis

Monocyte differentiation antigen CD14 is considered an important cell-activating mediator of inflammatory responses that may result in atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease (CHD), thrombus formation, and myocardial infarction (MI). A common C-260T polymorphism in the promoter of the CD14 gene, the trans-membrane receptor of lipopolysaccharides, has been inconsistently associated with CHD. To investigate this inconsistency, we performed a meta-analysis of 28 studies involving a total of 13,335 CHD cases and 7,979 controls for C-260T of the CD14 gene to evaluate the effect of CD14 on genetic susceptibility for CHD. An overall random effects odds ratio of 1.24 (95 % CI: 1.12–1.36, P < 10^?5) was found for T allele. Significant results were also observed using dominant (OR = 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.17–1.54, P < 10^?4) or recessive genetic model (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.10–1.41, P = 0.0004). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity (P < 10^?5), which largely disappeared after stratification by ethnicity. After stratified by ethnicity, significant results were found in East Asians; whereas no significant associations were found among Caucasians and other ethnic populations in all genetic models. In the stratified analysis according to sample size, CHD endpoints, and HWE status, significantly increased risks for the polymorphism were found in all genetic models. In conclusion, our results indicate that the CD14 C-260T polymorphism is a risk factor of CHD, especially in East Asians. However, additional very large-scale studies are warranted to confirm our results.     

Meta-analysis demonstrates lack of association of the GSK3B −50C/T polymorphism with risk of bipolar disorder

Published data on the association between GSK3B ?50C/T (rs334558) and bipolar disorder (BD) are inconclusive. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship of this single-nucleotide polymorphism with the susceptibility, and with the age at onset of BD. A literature search was conducted though PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases to identify relevant studies up to February 14, 2014. We identified a total of 6 publications including 1,251 cases and 1,804 controls to investigate the effect of GSK3B ?50C/T on BD risk, and found no significant association in any genetic models (C vs. T: OR = 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.92–1.15; CC vs. TT+TC: OR = 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.84–1.28; TC+CC vs. TT: OR = 1.16, 95 % CI: 0.97–1.39; and CC vs. TC vs. TT: OR = 1.08, 95 % CI: 0.96–1.22). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity did not change the results. The association between GSK3B ?50C/T and age at onset of BD was explored by 6 identified studies with a total of 659 BD type I patients. Similarly, we did not observe significant results in any genetic models (TC+CC vs. TT: SMD = 0.20, 95 % CI: ?0.07 to 0.47; CC vs. TT+TC: SMD = 0.11, 95 % CI: ?0.10 to 0.32; CC vs. TT: SMD = 0.32, 95 % CI: ?0.13 to 0.77). The power analysis and tests for publication bias ensured the reliability of our results. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the functional polymorphism ?50C/T within the GSK3B gene promoter is unlikely to relate with BD risk. However, more larger and well-designed studies are still needed to yield a conclusive result on the topic.     

The l58Val/Met polymorphism of catechol-O-methyl transferase gene and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The association between COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer has been evaluated. However, the results of these studies on the association remain conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the eligible studies of COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer risk. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the software program Review Manage (Version 5.0) and Stata (Version 12.0). Six case–control studies, totally 4,118 persons including 2,143 cases and 1,975 controls, met the included criteria and thus were selected. Our analysis suggested that Val158Met polymorphism was associated with prostate cancer risk in overall population. Collectively, the results of the present study suggest that significant associations of COMT Val158Met polymorphisms with prostate cancer were observed (for additive model: OR = 1.068, 95 % CI = 1.002–1.138, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.363, P = 0.043; for dominant model: OR = 1.266, 95 % CI = 1.057–1.517, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.000, P = 0.011; for recessive model: OR = 1.050, 95 % CI = 0.961–1.146, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.558, P = 0.279; and Val allele versus Met allele OR = 0.932, 95 % CI = 0.894–0.971, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.272, P = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, we detected no significant association between the COMT 158 Val/Met genotype and prostate cancer risk in Caucasian and Asian populations, while the contrary result for additive model (OR = 2.43, 95 % CI = 1.08–5.43, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.04, P = 0.03) in Asian populations. The result of this meta-analysis suggests that COMT l58Val/Met polymorphism might be contributed to the overall prostate cancer risk.     

Assessment of the association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of type 2 diabetes

Many studies have investigated the association between Glutathione S-Transferase M1 (GSTM1) null genotype and risk of diabetes mellitus, but the impact of GSTM1 null genotype on diabetes mellitus is unclear owing to the obvious inconsistence among those studies. This study aimed to quantify the strength of association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of diabetes mellitus. We searched the PubMed, Embase and Wangfang databases for studies relating the association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of diabetes mellitus. We estimated summary odds ratio (OR) with their 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) to assess the association. Subgroup analyses were performed by type of diabetes and ethnicity. 10 case–control studies with 7, 054 subjects were included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of total 10 studies showed GSTM1 null genotype was associated increased risk of diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.59, 95 % CI 1.14–2.22, P = 0.007). Subgroup analyses by type of diabetes mellitus suggested GSTM1 null genotype was associated increased risk of type 2 diabetes (OR = 1.90, 95 % CI 1.37–2.64, P < 0.001), but was not associated with risk of type 1 diabetes (OR = 0.84, 95 % CI 0.66–1.07, P = 0.153). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity further identified the obvious association between GSTM1 null genotype and increased risk of type 2 diabetes. The cumulative meta-analyses showed a trend of obvious association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of type 2 diabetes as information accumulated. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Thus, evidence from current meta-analysis suggests an association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of type 2 diabetes.     

Significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of asthma during childhood in Caucasians

Asthma is a complex multifactorial disorder and its management requires a better understanding of its various pathogenesis and mechanisms. Previous studies assessing the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null genotype and asthma risk during childhood reported conflicting results. To get a more precise estimation of the association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of asthma during childhood, we performed a meta-analysis of 16 studies with a total of 18,558 subjects. Subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) was used to assess the association. Overall, there was a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of children asthma (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI, 1.02–1.54; P = 0.032). Subgroup analyses showed GSTT1 null genotype was associated with increased risk of children asthma in Caucasians (OR = 1.46, 95 % CI, 1.04–2.03; P = 0.027), but not in Asians (OR = 1.03, 95 % CI, 0.55–1.94; P = 0.928) and Africans (OR = 1.33, 95 % CI, 0.92–1.91; P = 0.127). There was no evidence of publication bias in the subgroup analysis of Caucasians. In conclusion, there is a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of asthma during childhood in Caucasians. More well-designed epidemiological studies are needed to further assess this association in Asians and Africans.     

Glutathione S-transferases gene polymorphisms and risk of male idiopathic infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) polymorphisms have been implicated in susceptibility to male idiopathic infertility, but study results are still controversial. To investigate the genetic associations between GSTs polymorphisms and risk of male idiopathic infertility, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) form studies in electronic databases up to March 16, 2012. Glutathione S-transferase M 1 (GSTM1) null genotype, Glutathione S-transferase T 1 (GSTT1) null genotype, and dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 were analyzed independently. 14 eligible studies with a total of 1,845 idiopathic infertility males and 1,729 controls were included. There were 13 studies on GSTM1 polymorphism, 10 ones on GSTT1 polymorphism and 5 ones on GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis. Meta-analyses of total relevant studies showed GSTM1 null genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of male idiopathic infertility (OR = 1.40, 95 % CI 1.07–1.84, P _OR = 0.015). The GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis showed dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 was also significantly associated with increased risk of male idiopathic infertility (OR = 1.85, 95 % CI 1.07–3.21, P _OR = 0.028). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed the associations above were still statistically significant in Caucasians (For GSTM1, OR = 1.51, 95 % CI 1.11–2.05, P _OR = 0.009; For GSTM1/GSTT1, OR = 2.10, 95 % CI 1.51–2.91, P _OR < 0.001). This meta-analysis suggests GSTM1 null genotype contributes to increased risk of male idiopathic infertility in Caucasians, and males with dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 are particularly susceptible to developing idiopathic infertility.     

Association of CDKN1B gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to breast cancer: a meta-analysis

A number of case–control studies have been conducted to investigate the association of CDKN1B gene polymorphisms with breast cancer. However, these studies reported conflicting results. The aim of our study was to quantitatively summarize the association of CDKN1B gene polymorphisms with breast cancer. Systemic searches of the PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database databases were performed, with the last report up to Oct 2012. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Seven studies including 6,822 cases and 7,186 controls were involved in this meta-analysis, which was performed for two CDKN1B gene polymorphisms (rs2066827 and rs34330). Significant association was found for rs34330 polymorphism (T versus C: OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 1.03–1.18, P = 0.003; CT + TT versus CC: OR = 1.38, 95 % CI = 0.98–1.93, P = 0.07; TT versus CC + CT: OR = 1.06, 95 % CI = 0.93–1.21, P = 0.38; TT versus CC: OR = 1.23, 95 % CI = 1.04–1.45, P = 0.02; CT versus CC: OR = 1.42, 95 % CI = 0.97–2.09, P = 0.07), but not for rs2066827 polymorphism (G versus T: OR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.91–1.08, P = 0.84; TG + GG versus TT: OR = 0.98, 95 % CI = 0.89–1.08, P = 0.69; GG versus TT + TG: OR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.83–1.30, P = 0.75; GG versus TT: OR = 1.03, 95 % CI = 0.82–1.30, P = 0.77; TG versus TT: OR = 0.97, 95 % CI = 0.88–1.08, P = 0.58). This meta-analysis suggests that breast cancer may be associated with CDKN1B gene rs34330 polymorphism, but not rs2066827 polymorphism.     

Aberrant promoter hypermethylation of p21 (WAF1/CIP1) gene and its impact on expression and role of polymorphism in the risk of breast cancer

p21 (Waf-1) is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that plays essential roles in cell growth arrest, terminal differentiation, and apoptosis. Statistically significant difference in the level of methylation of p21/CIP1 (p < 0. 05) between the patients with breast cancer and the healthy controls was observed. Risk of breast cancer was increased in patients with hypermethylated p21/CIP1 promoter by 2.31-fold (OR = 2.31, 95 % CI 1.95–2.74). The downregulation of p21/CIP1 mRNA expression was statistically significant in patients with methylated promoter (p < 0.00) in comparison to patients with unmethylated genes. Downregulation of mRNA expression of p21/CIP1 was up to 79 % due to promoter hypermethylation. We examined several p21/CIP1 genotypes in the patients with breast cancer and found that there is no significant association of these p21/CIP1 genotypes with the risk of developing breast cancer. However, a significant 2.21-fold increase in the chance of developing breast cancer was observed in the candidates carrying at least one allele Arg mutant in p21/CIP1 genotype (i.e., Ser/Arg + Arg/Arg) with age >50 (OR = 2.21; 95 % CI 1.03–4.79).