A statistical thermodynamic model applied to experimental AFM population and location data is able to quantify DNA-histone binding strength and internucleosomal interaction differences between acetylated and unacetylated nucleosomal arrays

Imaging of nucleosomal arrays by atomic force microscopy allows a determination of the exact statistical distributions for the numbers of nucleosomes per array and the locations of nucleosomes on the arrays. This precision makes such data an excellent reference for testing models of nucleosome occupation on multisite DNA templates. The approach presented here uses a simple statistical thermodynamic model to calculate theoretical population and positional distributions and compares them to experimental distributions previously determined for 5S rDNA nucleosomal arrays (208-12,172-12). The model considers the possible locations of nucleosomes on the template, and takes as principal parameters an average free energy of interaction between histone octamers and DNA, and an average wrapping length of DNA around the octamers. Analysis of positional statistics shows that it is possible to consider interactions between nucleosomes and positioning effects as perturbations on a random positioning noninteracting model. Analysis of the population statistics is used to determine histone-DNA association constants and to test for differences in the free energies of nucleosome formation with different types of histone octamers, namely acetylated or unacetylated, and different DNA templates, namely 172-12 or 208-12 5S rDNA multisite templates. The results show that the two template DNAs bind histones with similar affinities but histone acetylation weakens the association of histones with both templates. Analysis of locational statistics is used to determine the strength of specific nucleosome positioning tendencies by the DNA templates, and the strength of the interactions between neighboring nucleosomes. The results show only weak positioning tendencies and that unacetylated nucleosomes interact much more strongly with one another than acetylated nucleosomes; in fact acetylation appears to induce a small anticooperative occupation effect between neighboring nucleosomes.     

CENP-A-containing nucleosomes: easier disassembly versus exclusive centromeric localization

CENP-A is a histone variant that replaces conventional H3 in nucleosomes of functional centromeres. We report here, from reconstitutions of CENP-A- and H3-containing nucleosomes on linear DNA fragments and the comparison of their electrophoretic mobility, that CENP-A induces some positioning of its own and some unwrapping at the entry-exit relative to canonical nucleosomes on both 5 S DNA and the alpha-satellite sequence on which it is normally loaded. This steady-state unwrapping was quantified to 7(+/-2) bp by nucleosome reconstitutions on a series of DNA minicircles, followed by their relaxation with topoisomerase I. The unwrapping was found to ease nucleosome invasion by exonuclease III, to hinder the binding of a linker histone, and to promote the release of an H2A-H2B dimer by nucleosome assembly protein 1 (NAP-1). The (CENP-A-H4)2 tetramer was also more readily destabilized with heparin than the (H3-H4)2 tetramer, suggesting that CENP-A has evolved to confer its nucleosome a specific ability to disassemble. This dual relative instability is proposed to facilitate the progressive clearance of CENP-A nucleosomes that assemble promiscuously in euchromatin, especially as is seen following CENP-A transient over-expression.     

Nucleotide excision repair of the 5 S ribosomal RNA gene assembled into a nucleosome

A-175-base pair fragment containing the Xenopus borealis somatic 5 S ribosomal RNA gene was used as a model system to determine the effect of nucleosome assembly on nucleotide excision repair (NER) of the major UV photoproduct (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD)) in DNA. Xenopus oocyte nuclear extracts were used to carry out repair in vitro on reconstituted, positioned 5 S rDNA nucleosomes. Nucleosome structure strongly inhibits NER at many CPD sites in the 5 S rDNA fragment while having little effect at a few sites. The time course of CPD removal at 35 different sites indicates that >85% of the CPDs in the naked DNA fragment have t(12) values <2 h, whereas <26% of the t(12) values in nucleosomes are <2 h, and 15% are >8 h. Moreover, removal of histone tails from these mononucleosomes has little effect on the repair rates. Finally, nucleosome inhibition of repair shows no correlation with the rotational setting of a 14-nucleotide-long pyrimidine tract located 30 base pairs from the nucleosome dyad. These results suggest that inhibition of NER by mononucleosomes is not significantly influenced by the rotational orientation of CPDs on the histone surface, and histone tails play little (or no) role in this inhibition.     

Hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ation of histone H1

Nucleosomal chains of various repeat unit lengths were generated by a mild micrococcal nuclease digestion of purified pancreatic nuclei. Maximal nucleosome associated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity was recovered in trimeric to tetrameric chromatin fragments, after which the enzyme activity gradually decreased and stabilized towards oligomeric periodicities of 11 to 16 nucleosomes. Electrophoresis of [32P]ADP-ribosylated histones on first-dimension acid-urea or acid-urea-Triton gels and on second-dimension acid--urea--cetyltriammonium bromide gels revealed that, of all histones, only histone H1 could be significantly poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated while only minimal modification could be recovered with histone H1(0). Furthermore, the extent of ADP-ribosylation present on pancreatic histone H1 is shown to proportionally retard this protein's electrophoretic mobility in all gel systems and to consist of a distinct series of at least 12 modification intermediates which can be evidenced, in nuclei or nucleosomes, and fully recovered along with histone H1 upon its selective extraction with 5% perchloric acid. The generation of these increasingly ADP-ribosylated forms of histone H1 is also demonstrated to be time dependent and the more complex ADP-ribosylated forms of this histone are favored at high NAD+ concentrations. Moreover, the electrophoretic mobilities of all intermediates are unaffected by the presence of the nonionic detergent Triton X-100.     

Differential core histone binding behavior: RNA polymerase I promoter region vs 5S rDNA positioning DNA sequences

In order to further characterize the previously observed disruptive effect of the RNA polymerase I promoter sequence (Pol I) from Acanthamoeba castellanii on tandemly repeated 5S rDNA positioning sequences from sea urchin (Lytechinus variegatus), we compared the histone-binding ability of the isolated 199-bp Pol I promoter region to that of the 208-bp 5S rDNA and that of nucleosome core particle sequences isolated from chicken erythocytes. We found the 5S rDNA positioning sequence to be more efficient at forming nucleosomes than the RNA polymerase I promoter sequence. Nevertheless, examination of the free-DNA half-depletion points during the titrations suggested that twice as much histone had bound to RNA polymerase I promoter sequence as to the 5S nucleosome-positioning or core particle sequences. DNA bending analysis suggested two potential DNA bending loci in the RNA polymerase I promoter, whereas only one such locus was predicted for the 5S positioning sequence. Such mixed bending signals on the RNA polymerase I promoter could favor non-nucleosomal deposition of histones on these sequences.     

Sin mutations alter inherent nucleosome mobility

Previous studies have identified sin mutations that alleviate the requirement for the yeast SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex, which include point changes in the yeast genes encoding core histones. Here we characterise the biochemical properties of nucleosomes bearing these mutations. We find that sin mutant nucleosomes have a high inherent thermal mobility. As the SWI/SNF complex can alter nucleosome positioning, the higher mobility of sin mutant nucleosomes provides a means by which sin mutations may substitute for SWI/SNF function. The location of sin mutations also provides a new opportunity for insights into the mechanism for nucleosome mobilisation. We find that both mutations altering histone DNA contacts at the nucleosome dyad and mutations in the dimer-tetramer interface influence nucleosome mobility. Furthermore, incorporation of H2A.Z into nucleosomes, which also alters dimer-tetramer interactions, affects nucleosome mobility. Thus, variation of histone sequence or subtype provides a means by which eukaryotes may regulate access to chromatin through alterations to nucleosome mobility.     

Nucleosomal structure of two Drosophila melanogaster simple satellites

Nucleosomes have been fractionated on nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels, and nucleosome subtypes containing the Drosophila melanogaster specific protein D1 and ubiquitinated core histone H2A were identified by solubility in 0.1 M NaCl before nucleoprotein gel electrophoresis. Nucleosomes which contain DNA complementary to the 1.672 density simple satellite (sequence-AATAT-) bind protein D1, as demonstrated by two-dimensional hybridization mapping. This hybridization pattern allows the identification of D1 dinucleosomes, which, like D1 mononucleosomes, are reduced in mobility on the first dimension (nucleoprotein) gel by the addition of D1, an AT sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. The 1.705 density simple satellite (sequence-AAGAG-) is also found in nucleosomes, in a radically different subset from those of the -AATAT- DNA sequence. -AAGAG- nucleosomes do not contain D1 protein, but appear to be enriched in ubiquitinated core histone H2A. One-dimensional hybridization patterns suggest that -AAGAG- nucleosomal DNA is rapidly trimmed to a shorter DNA length than either bulk or -AATAT- nucleosomes.     

Nucleosomal arrays can be salt-reconstituted on a single-copy MMTV promoter DNA template: their properties differ in several ways from those of comparable 5S concatameric arrays

Subsaturated nucleosomal arrays were reconstituted on a single-copy MMTV promoter DNA fragment by salt dialysis procedures and studied by atomic force microscopy. Up to an occupation level of approximately eight nucleosomes on this 1900 bp template, salt reconstitution produces nucleosomal arrays which look very similar to comparably loaded 5S rDNA nucleosomal arrays; i.e., nucleosomes are dispersed on the DNA template. Thus, at these occupation levels, the single-copy MMTV template forms arrays suitable for biophysical analyses. A quantitative comparison of the population features of subsaturated MMTV and 5S arrays detects differences between the two: a requirement for higher histone levels to achieve a given level of nucleosome occupation on MMTV templates, indicating that nucleosome loading is thermodynamically less favorable on this template; a preference for pairwise nucleosome occupation of the MMTV (but not the 5S) template at midrange occupation levels; and an enhanced salt stability for nucleosomes on MMTV versus 5S arrays, particularly in the midrange of array occupation. When average occupation levels exceed approximately eight nucleosomes per template, MMTV arrays show a significant level of mainly intramolecular compaction; 5S arrays do not. Taken together, these results show clearly that the nature of the underlying DNA template can affect the physical properties of nucleosomal arrays. DNA sequence-directed differences in the physical properties of chromatin may have important consequences for functional processes such as gene regulation.     

Ultraviolet damage and nucleosome folding of the 5S ribosomal RNA gene

The Xenopus borealis somatic 5S ribosomal RNA gene was used as a model system to determine the mutual effects of nucleosome folding and formation of ultraviolet (UV) photoproducts (primarily cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, or CPDs) in chromatin. We analyzed the preferred rotational and translational settings of 5S rDNA on the histone octamer surface after induction of up to 0.8 CPD/nucleosome core (2.5 kJ/m(2) UV dose). DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprints indicate that UV damage at these levels does not affect the average rotational setting of the 5S rDNA molecules. Moreover, a combination of nuclease trimming and restriction enzyme digestion indicates the preferred translational positions of the histone octamer are not affected by this level of UV damage. We also did not observe differences in the UV damage patterns of irradiated 5S rDNA before or after nucleosome formation, indicating there is little difference in the inhibition of nucleosome folding by specific CPD sites in the 5S rRNA gene. Conversely, nucleosome folding significantly restricts CPD formation at all sites in the three helical turns of the nontranscribed strand located in the dyad axis region of the nucleosome, where DNA is bound exclusively by the histone H3-H4 tetramer. Finally, modulation of the CPD distribution in a 14 nt long pyrimidine tract correlates with its rotational setting on the histone surface, when the strong sequence bias for CPD formation in this tract is minimized by normalization. These results help establish the mutual roles of histone binding and UV photoproducts on their formation in chromatin.     

A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, γ‐H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double‐strand break repair

Although recent studies highlight the importance of histone modifications and ATP‐dependent chromatin remodelling in DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair, how these mechanisms cooperate has remained largely unexplored. Here, we show that the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex, earlier known to facilitate the phosphorylation of histone H2AX at Ser‐139 (S139ph) after DNA damage, binds to γ‐H2AX (the phosphorylated form of H2AX)‐containing nucleosomes in S139ph‐dependent manner. Unexpectedly, BRG1, the catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF, binds to γ‐H2AX nucleosomes by interacting with acetylated H3, not with S139ph itself, through its bromodomain. Blocking the BRG1 interaction with γ‐H2AX nucleosomes either by deletion or overexpression of the BRG1 bromodomain leads to defect of S139ph and DSB repair. H3 acetylation is required for the binding of BRG1 to γ‐H2AX nucleosomes. S139ph stimulates the H3 acetylation on γ‐H2AX nucleosomes, and the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 is responsible for this novel crosstalk. The H3 acetylation on γ‐H2AX nucleosomes is induced by DNA damage. These results collectively suggest that SWI/SNF, γ‐H2AX and H3 acetylation cooperatively act in a feedback activation loop to facilitate DSB repair.     

Telomeric nucleosomes are intrinsically mobile

Nucleosomes are no longer considered only static basic units that package eukaryotic DNA but they emerge as dynamic players in all chromosomal processes. Regulatory proteins can gain access to recognition sequences hidden by the histone octamer through the action of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes that cause nucleosome sliding. In addition, it is known that nucleosomes are able to spontaneously reposition along the DNA due to intrinsic dynamic properties, but it is not clear yet to what extent sequence-dependent dynamic properties contribute to nucleosome repositioning. Here, we study mobility of nucleosomes formed on telomeric sequences as a function of temperature and ionic strength. We find that telomeric nucleosomes are highly intrinsically mobile under physiological conditions, whereas nucleosomes formed on an average DNA sequence mostly remain in the initial position. This indicates that DNA sequence affects not only the thermodynamic stability and the positioning of nucleosomes but also their dynamic properties. Moreover, our findings suggest that the high mobility of telomeric nucleosomes may be relevant to the dynamics of telomeric chromatin.     

Histone H2A ubiquitination does not preclude histone H1 binding, but it facilitates its association with the nucleosome

Histone H2A ubiquitination is a bulky posttranslational modification that occurs at the vicinity of the binding site for linker histones in the nucleosome. Therefore, we took several experimental approaches to investigate the role of ubiquitinated H2A (uH2A) in the binding of linker histones. Our results showed that uH2A was present in situ in histone H1-containing nucleosomes. Notably in vitro experiments using nucleosomes reconstituted onto 167-bp random sequence and 208-bp (5 S rRNA gene) DNA fragments showed that ubiquitination of H2A did not prevent binding of histone H1 but it rather enhanced the binding of this histone to the nucleosome. We also showed that ubiquitination of H2A did not affect the positioning of the histone octamer in the nucleosome in either the absence or the presence of linker histones.