Insight into centromere-binding properties of ParB proteins: a secondary binding motif is essential for bacterial genome maintenance

ParB proteins are one of the three essential components of partition systems that actively segregate bacterial chromosomes and plasmids. In binding to centromere sequences, ParB assembles as nucleoprotein structures called partition complexes. These assemblies are the substrates for the partitioning process that ensures DNA molecules are segregated to both sides of the cell. We recently identified the sopC centromere nucleotides required for binding to the ParB homologue of plasmid F, SopB. This analysis also suggested a role in sopC binding for an arginine residue, R219, located outside the helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motif previously shown to be the only determinant for sopC-specific binding. Here, we demonstrated that the R219 residue is critical for SopB binding to sopC during partition. Mutating R219 to alanine or lysine abolished partition by preventing partition complex assembly. Thus, specificity of SopB binding relies on two distinct motifs, an HTH and an arginine residue, which define a split DNA-binding domain larger than previously thought. Bioinformatic analysis over a broad range of chromosomal ParBs generalized our findings with the identification of a non-HTH positively charged residue essential for partition and centromere binding, present in a newly identified highly conserved motif. We propose that ParB proteins possess two DNA-binding motifs that form an extended centromere-binding domain, providing high specificity.     

Centromere binding specificity in assembly of the F plasmid partition complex

The segregation of plasmid F of Escherichia coli is highly reliable. The Sop partition locus, responsible for this stable maintenance, is composed of two genes, sopA and sopB and a centromere, sopC, consisting of 12 direct repeats of 43 bp. Each repeat carries a 16-bp inverted repeat motif to which SopB binds to form a nucleoprotein assembly called the partition complex. A database search for sequences closely related to sopC revealed unexpected features that appeared highly conserved. We have investigated the requirements for specific SopB–sopC interactions using a surface plasmon resonance imaging technique. We show that (i) only 10 repeats interact specifically with SopB, (ii) no base outside the 16-bp sopC sites is involved in binding specificity, whereas five bases present in each arm are required for interactions, and (iii) the A-C central bases contribute to binding efficiency by conforming to a need for a purine–pyrimidine dinucleotide. We have refined the SopB–sopC binding pattern by electro-mobility shift assay and found that all 16 bp are necessary for optimal SopB binding. These data and the model we propose, define the basis of the high binding specificity of F partition complex assembly, without which, dispersal of SopB over DNA would result in defective segregation.     

POT1 proteins in green algae and land plants: DNA-binding properties and evidence of co-evolution with telomeric DNA

Telomeric DNA terminates with a single-stranded 3′ G-overhang that in vertebrates and fission yeast is bound by POT1 (Protection Of Telomeres). However, no in vitro telomeric DNA binding is associated with Arabidopsis POT1 paralogs. To further investigate POT1–DNA interaction in plants, we cloned POT1 genes from 11 plant species representing major branches of plant kingdom. Telomeric DNA binding was associated with POT1 proteins from the green alga Ostreococcus lucimarinus and two flowering plants, maize and Asparagus. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that several residues critical for telomeric DNA recognition in vertebrates are functionally conserved in plant POT1 proteins. However, the plant proteins varied in their minimal DNA-binding sites and nucleotide recognition properties. Green alga POT1 exhibited a strong preference for the canonical plant telomere repeat sequence TTTAGGG with no detectable binding to hexanucleotide telomere repeat TTAGGG found in vertebrates and some plants, including Asparagus. In contrast, POT1 proteins from maize and Asparagus bound TTAGGG repeats with only slightly reduced affinity relative to the TTTAGGG sequence. We conclude that the nucleic acid binding site in plant POT1 proteins is evolving rapidly, and that the recent acquisition of TTAGGG telomere repeats in Asparagus appears to have co-evolved with changes in POT1 DNA sequence recognition.     

Centromere pairing by a plasmid-encoded type I ParB protein

The par2 locus of Escherichia coli plasmid pB171 encodes two trans-acting proteins, ParA and ParB, and two cis-acting sites, parC1 and parC2, to which ParB binds cooperatively. ParA is related to MinD and oscillates in helical structures and thereby positions ParB/parC-carrying plasmids regularly over the nucleoid. ParB ribbon-helix-helix dimers bind cooperatively to direct repeats in parC1 and parC2. Using four different assays we obtain solid evidence that ParB can pair parC1- and parC2-encoding DNA fragments in vitro. Convincingly, electron microscopy revealed that ParB mediates binary pairing of parC fragments. In addition to binary complexes, ParB mediated the formation of higher order complexes consisting of several DNA fragments joined by ParB at centromere site parC. N-terminal truncated versions of ParB still possessing specific DNA binding activity were incompetent in pairing, hence identifying the N terminus of ParB as a requirement for ParB-mediated centromere pairing. These observations suggest that centromere pairing is an important intermediate step in plasmid partitioning mediated by the common type I loci.     

Helicobacter pylori NikR protein exhibits distinct conformations when bound to different promoters

Helicobacter pylori NikR (HpNikR) is a ribbon-helix-helix (RHH) DNA-binding protein that binds to several different promoter regions. The binding site sequences are not absolutely conserved. The ability of HpNikR to discriminate specific DNA sites resides partly in its nine-amino acid N-terminal arm. Previously, indirect evidence indicated that the arm exists in different conformations when HpNikR is bound to the nixA and ureA promoters. Here, we directly examined HpNikR conformation when it was bound to nixA and ureA DNA fragments by tethering (S)-1{[bis(carboxymethyl)amino]methyl}-2-{4-[(2-bromoacetyl)amino]phenylethyl}(carboxymethyl)amino]acetic acid, iron(III) to different positions in the N-terminal arm and RHH DNA binding domain. Different cleavage patterns at each promoter directly demonstrated that both the RHH domain and the arm adopt different conformations on the nixA and ureA promoters. Additionally, the two RHH domain dimers of the HpNikR tetramer are in distinct conformations at ureA. Site-directed mutagenesis identified an interchain salt bridge (Lys(48)-Glu(47')) in the RHH domain remote from the DNA binding interface that is required for high affinity binding to ureA but not nixA. Finally, DNA affinity measurements of wild-type HpNikR and a salt bridge mutant (K48A) to hybrid nixA-ureA promoters demonstrated that inverted repeat half-sites, spacers, and flanking DNA are all required for sequence-specific DNA binding by HpNikR. Notably, the spacer region made the largest contribution to DNA affinity. HpNikR exhibits a substantially expanded regulon compared with other NikR proteins. The results presented here provide a molecular basis for understanding regulatory network expansion by NikR as well as other prokaryotic regulatory proteins.     

Insight into F plasmid DNA segregation revealed by structures of SopB and SopB–DNA complexes

Accurate DNA segregation is essential for genome transmission. Segregation of the prototypical F plasmid requires the centromere-binding protein SopB, the NTPase SopA and the sopC centromere. SopB displays an intriguing range of DNA-binding properties essential for partition; it binds sopC to form a partition complex, which recruits SopA, and it also coats DNA to prevent non-specific SopA–DNA interactions, which inhibits SopA polymerization. To understand the myriad functions of SopB, we determined a series of SopB–DNA crystal structures. SopB does not distort its DNA site and our data suggest that SopB–sopC forms an extended rather than wrapped partition complex with the SopA-interacting domains aligned on one face. SopB is a multidomain protein, which like P1 ParB contains an all-helical DNA-binding domain that is flexibly attached to a compact (β₃–α)₂ dimer-domain. Unlike P1 ParB, the SopB dimer-domain does not bind DNA. Moreover, SopB contains a unique secondary dimerization motif that bridges between DNA duplexes. Both specific and non-specific SopB–DNA bridging structures were observed. This DNA-linking function suggests a novel mechanism for in trans DNA spreading by SopB, explaining how it might mask DNA to prevent DNA-mediated inhibition of SopA polymerization.     

P1 partition complex assembly involves several modes of protein-DNA recognition

Assembly of P1 plasmid partition complexes at the partition site, parS, is nucleated by a dimer of P1 ParB and Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF), which promotes loading of more ParB dimers and the pairing of plasmids during the cell cycle. ParB binds several copies of two distinct recognition motifs, known as A- and B-boxes, which flank a bend in parS created by IHF binding. The recent crystal structure of ParB bound to a partial parS site revealed two relatively independent DNA-binding domains and raised the question of how a dimer of ParB recognizes its complicated arrangement of recognition motifs when it loads onto the full parS site in the presence of IHF. In this study, we addressed this question by examining ParB binding activities to parS mutants containing different combinations of the A- and B-box motifs in parS. Binding was measured to linear and supercoiled DNA in electrophoretic and filter binding assays, respectively. ParB showed preferences for certain motifs that are dependent on position and on plasmid topology. In the simplest arrangement, one motif on either side of the bend was sufficient to form a complex, although affinity differed depending on the motifs. Therefore, a ParB dimer can load onto parS in different ways, so that the initial ParB-IHF-parS complex consists of a mixture of different orientations of ParB. This arrangement supports a model in which parS motifs are available for interas well as intramolecular parS recognition.     

The essential DNA-binding protein sap1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains two independent oligomerization interfaces that dictate the relative orientation of the DNA-binding domain.

The sap1 gene from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which is essential for mating-type switching and for growth, encodes a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein with no homology to other known proteins. We have used a reiterative selection procedure to isolate binding sites for sap1, using a bacterially expressed protein and randomized double-strand oligonucleotides. The sap1 homodimer preferentially selects a pentameric motif, TA(A/G)CG, organized as a direct repeat and spaced by 5 nucleotides. Removal of a C-terminal dimerization domain abolishes recognition of the direct repeat and creates a new specificity for a DNA sequence containing the same pentameric motif but organized as an inverted repeat. We present evidence that the orientation of the DNA-binding domain is controlled by two independent oligomerization interfaces. The C-terminal dimerization domain allows a head-to-tail organization of the DNA-binding domains in solution, while an N-terminal domain is involved in a cooperative interaction on the DNA target between pairs of dimers.     

TraY DNA recognition of its two F factor binding sites

F factor TraY, a ribbon-helix-helix DNA-binding protein, performs two roles in bacterial conjugation. TraY binds the F origin of transfer (oriT) to promote nicking of plasmid DNA prior to conjugative transfer. TraY also binds the P(Y) promoter to up-regulate tra gene expression. The two plasmid regions bound by TraY share limited sequence identity, yet TraY binds them with similar affinities. TraY recognition of the two sites was first probed using in vitro footprinting methods. Hydroxyl radical footprinting at both oriT and P(Y) sites indicated that bound TraY protected the DNA backbone bordering three adjacent DNA subsites. Analytical ultracentrifugation results for TraY:oligonucleotide complexes were consistent with two of these subsites being bound cooperatively, and the third being occupied at higher TraY concentrations. Methylation protection and interference footprinting identified several guanine bases contacted by or proximal to bound TraY, most located within these subsites. TraY affinity for variant oriT sequences with base substitutions at or near these guanine bases suggested that two of the three subsites correspond to high-affinity, cooperatively bound imperfect inverted GA(G/T)A repeats. Altering the spacing or orientation of these sites reduced binding. TraY mutant R73A failed to protect two symmetry-related oriT guanine bases in these repeats from methylation, identifying possible direct TraY-DNA contacts. The third subsite appears to be oriented as an imperfect direct repeat with its adjacent subsite, although base substitutions at this subsite did not reduce binding. Although unusual for ribbon-helix-helix proteins, this binding site arrangement occurs at both F TraY sites, consistent with it being functionally relevant.     

Molecular Analysis of pSK1 par: A Novel Plasmid Partitioning System Encoded by Staphylococcal Multiresistance Plasmids

The segregation of prokaryotic plasmids typically requires a centromere-like site and two proteins, a centromere-binding protein (CBP) and an NTPase. By contrast, a single 245 residue Par protein mediates partition of the prototypical staphylococcal multiresistance plasmid pSK1 in the absence of an identifiable NTPase component. To gain insight into centromere binding by pSK1 Par and its segregation function we performed structural, biochemical and in vivo studies. Here we show that pSK1 Par binds a centromere consisting of seven repeat elements. We demonstrate this Par-centromere interaction also mediates Par autoregulation. To elucidate the Par centromere binding mechanism, we obtained a structure of the Par N-terminal DNA-binding domain bound to centromere DNA to 2.25 Å. The pSK1 Par structure, which harbors a winged-helix-turn-helix (wHTH), is distinct from other plasmid CBP structures but shows homology to the B. subtilis chromosome segregation protein, RacA. Biochemical studies suggest the region C-terminal to the Par wHTH forms coiled coils and mediates oligomerization. Fluorescence microscopy analyses show that pSK1 Par enhances the separation of plasmids from clusters, driving effective segregation upon cell division. Combined the data provide insight into the molecular properties of a single protein partition system.     

Molecular dissection of the silkworm ribosomal stalk complex: the role of multiple copies of the stalk proteins

In animal ribosomes, two stalk proteins P1 and P2 form a heterodimer, and the two dimers, with the anchor protein P0, constitute a pentameric complex crucial for recruitment of translational GTPase factors to the ribosome. To investigate the functional contribution of each copy of the stalk proteins, we constructed P0 mutants, in which one of the two C-terminal helices, namely helix I (N-terminal side) or helix II (C-terminal side) were unable to bind the P1–P2 dimer. We also constructed ‘one-C-terminal domain (CTD) stalk dimers’, P1–P2_ΔC and P1_ΔC–P2, composed of intact P1/P2 monomer and a CTD-truncated partner. Through combinations of P0 and P1–P2 variants, various complexes were reconstituted and their function tested in eEF-2-dependent GTPase and eEF-1α/eEF-2-dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis assays in vitro. Double/single-CTD dimers bound to helix I showed higher activity than that bound to helix II. Despite low polypeptide synthetic activity by a single one-CTD dimer, its binding to both helices considerably increased activity, suggesting that two stalk dimers cooperate, particularly in polypeptide synthesis. This promotion of activity by two stalk dimers was lost upon mutation of the conserved YPT sequence connecting the two helices of P0, suggesting a role for this sequence in cooperativity of two stalk dimers.