Roles of NtGTBP1 in telomere stability

Telomeres are protective nucleoprotein structures at the ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes. In contrast to double-stranded-specific telomere-binding proteins, the cellular roles of single-stranded-specific telomeric proteins are not well understood in higher plants. Three highly conserved tobacco G-strand-specific telomere-binding protein paralogs (NtGTBP1, NtGTBP2 and NtGTBP3) were identified and characterized. All three NtGTBPs were able to bind specifically to the plant single-stranded telomeric repeat elements in vitro with similar affinities. Suppression of NtGTBP1 by means of the RNAi-mediated gene knock-down method resulted in developmental defects in transgenic tobacco plants accompanied by lengthened telomeres, extra-chromosomal telomeric circles and abnormal anaphase bridges. These results suggest that the downregulation of NtGTBP1 results in genome instability. NtGTBP1 prevented in vitro strand invasion, a prerequisite process for inter-chromosomal telomeric recombination. Therefore, tobacco NtGTBP1 is one of the essential factors for telomere stability. Because abnormal telomeric elongation and recombination due to the suppression of NtGTBP1 are reminiscent of the recombinational telomere lengthening mechanism that purportedly operates in telomerase negative cancer cells, it is of interest to investigate whether telomeric recombination is associated with cell death in animal systems.Key words: genome stability, inter-chromosomal recombination, single-stranded telomere-binding proteinsExtreme ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes maintain telomeres, which contain protective complexes of proteins and DNA repeats.^1,2 Telomeric DNA repeats consist of two parts: double-stranded and single-stranded DNA sequence elements. Telomere sequences are protected by specialized sequence-specific non-histone DNA binding proteins. In higher plants, Myb domain-containing double-stranded DNA binding proteins (TRFs) are relatively well characterized and appear to be functionally conserved with mammalian TRFs.^3–5 However, situation of single-stranded telomeric binding proteins is complicated. Pot1, a well-known shelterin complex protein, has single-stranded telomere repeat binding activity in yeasts and mammals but no DNA binding activity in Arabidopsis, despite the fact that it is necessary for the proper maintenance of telomere integrity.^6–8 These results led us to investigate other proteins that potentially bind to single-stranded telomeric ends. Because some reports have found that human heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (HnRNP) homologs contain sequence-specific telomere repeat binding activity in higher plants,^9,10 we characterized tobacco NtGTBP1, a homolog of human HnRNPs, by performing in vitro gel retardation assays and phenotypic analyses of RNAi-mediated knockdown transgenic tobacco plants, in which NtGTBP1 was downregulated.¹¹     

Interaction of an Arabidopsis RNA-binding protein with plant single-stranded telomeric DNA modulates telomerase activity

Telomeres are the specialized structures at the end of linear chromosomes and terminate with a single-stranded 3' overhang of the G-rich strand. The primary role of telomeres is to protect chromosome ends from recombination and fusion and from being recognized as broken DNA ends. This protective function can be achieved through association with specific telomere-binding proteins. Although proteins that bind single-stranded G-rich overhang regulate telomere length and telomerase activity in mammals and lower eukaryotes, equivalent factors have yet to be identified in plants. Here we have identified proteins capable of interacting with the G-rich single-stranded telomeric repeat from the Arabidopsis extracts by affinity chromatography. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis indicates that the isolated protein is a chloroplast RNA-binding protein (and a truncated derivative). The truncated derivative, which we refer to as STEP1 (single-stranded telomere-binding protein 1), binds specifically the single-stranded G-rich plant telomeric DNA sequences but not double-stranded telomeric DNA. Unlike the chloroplast-localized full-length RNA-binding protein, STEP1 localizes exclusively to the nucleus, suggesting that it plays a role in plant telomere biogenesis. We also demonstrated that the specific binding of STEP1 to single-stranded telomeric DNA inhibits telomerase-mediated telomere extension. The evidence presented here suggests that STEP1 is a telomere-end binding protein that may contribute to telomere length regulation by capping the ends of chromosomes and thereby repressing telomerase activity in plants.     

POT1 proteins in green algae and land plants: DNA-binding properties and evidence of co-evolution with telomeric DNA

Telomeric DNA terminates with a single-stranded 3′ G-overhang that in vertebrates and fission yeast is bound by POT1 (Protection Of Telomeres). However, no in vitro telomeric DNA binding is associated with Arabidopsis POT1 paralogs. To further investigate POT1–DNA interaction in plants, we cloned POT1 genes from 11 plant species representing major branches of plant kingdom. Telomeric DNA binding was associated with POT1 proteins from the green alga Ostreococcus lucimarinus and two flowering plants, maize and Asparagus. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that several residues critical for telomeric DNA recognition in vertebrates are functionally conserved in plant POT1 proteins. However, the plant proteins varied in their minimal DNA-binding sites and nucleotide recognition properties. Green alga POT1 exhibited a strong preference for the canonical plant telomere repeat sequence TTTAGGG with no detectable binding to hexanucleotide telomere repeat TTAGGG found in vertebrates and some plants, including Asparagus. In contrast, POT1 proteins from maize and Asparagus bound TTAGGG repeats with only slightly reduced affinity relative to the TTTAGGG sequence. We conclude that the nucleic acid binding site in plant POT1 proteins is evolving rapidly, and that the recent acquisition of TTAGGG telomere repeats in Asparagus appears to have co-evolved with changes in POT1 DNA sequence recognition.     

Telomere binding of the Rap1 protein is required for meiosis in fission yeast.

Telomeres are essential for chromosome integrity, protecting the ends of eukaryotic linear chromosomes during cell proliferation. Telomeres also function in meiosis; a characteristic clustering of telomeres beneath the nuclear membrane is observed during meiotic prophase in many organisms from yeasts to plants and humans, and the role of the telomeres in meiotic pairing and the recombination of homologous chromosomes has been demonstrated in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we report that S. pombe Rap1 is a telomeric protein essential for meiosis. While Rap1 is conserved in budding yeast and humans, schemes for telomere binding vary among species: human RAP1 binds to the telomere through interaction with the telomere binding protein TRF2; S. cerevisiae Rap1, however, binds telomeric DNA directly, and no orthologs of TRF proteins have been identified in this organism. In S. pombe, unlike in S. cerevisiae, an ortholog of human TRF has been identified. This ortholog, Taz1, binds directly to telomere repeats [18] and is necessary for telomere clustering in meiotic prophase. Our results demonstrate that S. pombe Rap1 binds to telomeres through interaction with Taz1, similar to human Rap1-TRF2, and that Taz1-mediated telomere localization of Rap1 is necessary for telomere clustering and for the successful completion of meiosis. Moreover, in taz1-disrupted cells, molecular fusion of Rap1 with the Taz1 DNA binding domain recovers telomere clustering and largely complements defects in meiosis, indicating that telomere localization of Rap1 is a key requirement for meiosis.     

Arabidopsis thaliana telomeric DNA-binding protein 1 is required for telomere length homeostasis and its Myb-extension domain stabilizes plant telomeric DNA binding

Telomeres are specific protein–DNA complexes that protect the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes from fusion and degradation and are maintained by a specialized mechanism exerted by telomerase and telomere-binding proteins (TBPs), which are evolutionarily conserved. AtTBP1 is an Arabidopsis thaliana protein that binds plant telomeric DNA in vitro. Here, we demonstrated that lack of AtTBP1 results in a deregulation of telomere length control, with mutant telomeres expanding steadily by the fourth generation. DNA-binding studies with mutant AtTBP1 proteins showed that the Myb-extension domain of AtTBP1 is required for binding to plant telomeric DNA. Our results suggest that AtTBP1 is involved in the telomere length mechanism in A. thaliana and that the Myb-extension domain of AtTBP1 may stabilize plant telomeric DNA binding.     

Protection of Telomeres 1 Is Required for Telomere Integrity in the Moss Physcomitrella patens

In vertebrates, the single-stranded telomeric DNA binding protein Protection of Telomeres 1 (POT1) shields chromosome ends and prevents them from eliciting a DNA damage response. By contrast, Arabidopsis thaliana encodes two divergent full-length POT1 paralogs that do not exhibit telomeric DNA binding in vitro and have evolved to mediate telomerase regulation instead of chromosome end protection. To further investigate the role of POT1 in plants, we established the moss Physcomitrella patens as a new model for telomere biology and a counterpoint to Arabidopsis. The sequence and architecture of the telomere tract is similar in P. patens and Arabidopsis, but P. patens harbors only a single-copy POT1 gene. Unlike At POT1 proteins, Pp POT1 efficiently bound single-stranded telomeric DNA in vitro. Deletion of the P. patens POT1 gene resulted in the rapid onset of severe developmental defects and sterility. Although telomerase activity levels were unperturbed, telomeres were substantially shortened, harbored extended G-overhangs, and engaged in end-to-end fusions. We conclude that the telomere capping function of POT1 is conserved in early diverging land plants but is subsequently lost in Arabidopsis.     

Plant telomere-binding proteins

Telomere-binding proteins have recently been recognised not only as necessary building blocks of telomere structure, but namely as components which are of central importance to telomere metabolism being involved in regulation of telomere length as well as in protective (capping) function of telomeres. Although the knowledge on plant telomeric DNA-binding proteins lags behind that in human and yeast, recent data show both analogies and plant-specific features in the composition and interactions of telomeric proteins. This review focuses primarily on proteins with known amino acid sequence. These can be classified into following groups: 1) the family of proteins with Myb domain at C-terminus, 2) proteins with Myb domain at N-terminus, both binding double-stranded DNA of telomeric repeats TTTAGGG, 3) the single-stranded DNA-binding proteins, and 4) other proteins that act also in non-telomeric chromatin regions. Proteins with C-terminal Myb domain reported as IBP family were previously found in human, whereas Smh family representing proteins with Myb domain at N-terminus was identified only in plants. Also RRM family of the single-stranded DNA-binding proteins is likely to be plant specific.     

Characterization and developmental expression of single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding proteins from mung bean (Vigna radiata)

We have identified and characterized protein factors from mung bean (Vigna radiata) nuclear extracts that specifically bind the single-stranded G-rich telomeric DNA repeats. Nuclear extracts were prepared from three different types of plant tissue, radicle, hypocotyl, and root, in order to examine changes in the expression patterns of telomere-binding proteins during the development of mung bean. At least three types of specific complexes (A, B, and C) were detected by gel retardation assays with synthetic telomere and nuclear extract from radicle tissue, whereas the two major faster-migrating complexes (A and B) were formed with nuclear extracts from hypocotyl and root tissues. Gel retardation assays also revealed differences in relative amount of each complex forming activity in radicle, hypocotyl, and root nuclear extracts. These data suggest that the expression of telomere-binding proteins is developmentally regulated in plants, and that the factor involved in the formation of complex C may be required during the early stages of development. The binding factors have properties of proteins and are hence designated as mung bean G-rich telomere-binding proteins (MGBP). MGBPs bind DNA substrates with three or more single-stranded TTTAGGG repeats, while none of them show binding affinity to either double-stranded or single-stranded C-rich telomeric DNA. These proteins have a lower affinity to human telomeric sequences than to plant telomeric sequences and do not exhibit a significant binding activity to Tetrahymena telomeric sequence or mutated plant telomeric sequences, indicating that their binding activities are specific to plant telomere. Furthermore, RNase treatment of the nuclear extracts did not affect the complex formation activities. This result indicates that the single-stranded telomere-binding activities may be attributed to a simple protein but not a ribonucleoprotein. The ability of MGBPs to bind specifically the single-stranded TTTAGGG repeats may suggest their in vivo functions in the chromosome ends of plants.     

Repair of Chromosome Ends after Telomere Loss in Saccharomyces

Removal of a telomere from yeast chromosome VII in a strain having two copies of this chromosome often results in its loss. Here we show that there are three pathways that can stabilize this broken chromosome: homologous recombination, nonhomologous end joining, and de novo telomere addition. Both in a wild-type and a recombination deficient rad52 strain, most stabilization events were due to homologous recombination, whereas nonhomologous end joining was exceptionally rare. De novo telomere addition was relatively rare, stabilizing <0.1% of broken chromosomes. Telomere addition took place at a very limited number of sites on chromosome VII, most occurring close to a 35-base pair stretch of telomere-like DNA that is normally approximately 50 kb from the left telomere of chromosome VII. In the absence of the Pif1p DNA helicase, telomere addition events were much more frequent and were not concentrated near the 35-base pair tract of telomere-like DNA. We propose that internal tracts of telomere-like sequence recruit telomerase by binding its anchor site and that Pif1p inhibits telomerase by dissociating DNA primer-telomerase RNA interactions. These data also show that telomeric DNA is essential for the stable maintenance of linear chromosomes in yeast.     

SLX4 contributes to telomere preservation and regulated processing of telomeric joint molecule intermediates

SLX4 assembles a toolkit of endonucleases SLX1, MUS81 and XPF, which is recruited to telomeres via direct interaction of SLX4 with TRF2. Telomeres present an inherent obstacle for DNA replication and repair due to their high propensity to form branched DNA intermediates. Here we provide novel insight into the mechanism and regulation of the SLX4 complex in telomere preservation. SLX4 associates with telomeres throughout the cell cycle, peaking in late S phase and under genotoxic stress. Disruption of SLX4''s interaction with TRF2 or SLX1 and SLX1''s nuclease activity independently causes telomere fragility, suggesting a requirement of the SLX4 complex for nucleolytic resolution of branched intermediates during telomere replication. Indeed, the SLX1–SLX4 complex processes a variety of telomeric joint molecules in vitro. The nucleolytic activity of SLX1-SLX4 is negatively regulated by telomeric DNA-binding proteins TRF1 and TRF2 and is suppressed by the RecQ helicase BLM in vitro. In vivo, in the presence of functional BLM, telomeric circle formation and telomere sister chromatid exchange, both arising out of nucleolytic processing of telomeric homologous recombination intermediates, are suppressed. We propose that the SLX4-toolkit is a telomere accessory complex that, in conjunction with other telomere maintenance proteins, ensures unhindered, but regulated telomere maintenance.     

Inhibition of Telomere Recombination by Inactivation of KEOPS Subunit Cgi121 Promotes Cell Longevity

DNA double strand break (DSB) is one of the major damages that cause genome instability and cellular aging. The homologous recombination (HR)-mediated repair of DSBs plays an essential role in assurance of genome stability and cell longevity. Telomeres resemble DSBs and are competent for HR. Here we show that in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomere recombination elicits genome instability and accelerates cellular aging. Inactivation of KEOPS subunit Cgi121 specifically inhibits telomere recombination, and significantly extends cell longevity in both telomerase-positive and pre-senescing telomerase-negative cells. Deletion of CGI121 in the short-lived yku80^tel mutant restores lifespan to cgi121Δ level, supporting the function of Cgi121 in telomeric single-stranded DNA generation and thus in promotion of telomere recombination. Strikingly, inhibition of telomere recombination is able to further slow down the aging process in long-lived fob1Δ cells, in which rDNA recombination is restrained. Our study indicates that HR activity at telomeres interferes with telomerase to pose a negative impact on cellular longevity.     

ERCC1/XPF Protects Short Telomeres from Homologous Recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana

Many repair and recombination proteins play essential roles in telomere function and chromosome stability, notwithstanding the role of telomeres in “hiding” chromosome ends from DNA repair and recombination. Among these are XPF and ERCC1, which form a structure-specific endonuclease known for its essential role in nucleotide excision repair and is the subject of considerable interest in studies of recombination. In contrast to observations in mammalian cells, we observe no enhancement of chromosomal instability in Arabidopsis plants mutated for either XPF (AtRAD1) or ERCC1 (AtERCC1) orthologs, which develop normally and show wild-type telomere length. However, in the absence of telomerase, mutation of either of these two genes induces a significantly earlier onset of chromosomal instability. This early appearance of telomere instability is not due to a general acceleration of telomeric repeat loss, but is associated with the presence of dicentric chromosome bridges and cytologically visible extrachromosomal DNA fragments in mitotic anaphase. Such extrachromosomal fragments are not observed in later-generation single-telomerase mutant plants presenting similar frequencies of anaphase bridges. Extensive FISH analyses show that these DNAs are broken chromosomes and correspond to two specific chromosome arms. Analysis of the Arabidopsis genome sequence identified two extensive blocks of degenerate telomeric repeats, which lie at the bases of these two arms. Our data thus indicate a protective role of ERCC1/XPF against 3′ G-strand overhang invasion of interstitial telomeric repeats. The fact that the Atercc1 (and Atrad1) mutants dramatically potentiate levels of chromosome instability in Attert mutants, and the absence of such events in the presence of telomerase, have important implications for models of the roles of recombination at telomeres and is a striking illustration of the impact of genome structure on the outcomes of equivalent recombination processes in different organisms.     

The Rap1p-telomere complex does not determine the replicative capacity of telomerase-deficient yeast

Telomeres are nucleoprotein structures that cap the ends of chromosomes and thereby protect their stability and integrity. In the presence of telomerase, the enzyme that synthesizes telomeric repeats, telomere length is controlled primarily by Rap1p, the budding yeast telomeric DNA binding protein which, through its C-terminal domain, nucleates a protein complex that limits telomere lengthening. In the absence of telomerase, telomeres shorten with every cell division, and eventually, cells enter replicative senescence. We have set out to identify the telomeric property that determines the replicative capacity of telomerase-deficient budding yeast. We show that in cells deficient for both telomerase and homologous recombination, replicative capacity is dependent on telomere length but not on the binding of Rap1p to the telomeric repeats. Strikingly, inhibition of Rap1p binding or truncation of the C-terminal tail of Rap1p in Kluyveromyces lactis and deletion of the Rap1p-recruited complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae lead to a dramatic increase in replicative capacity. The study of the role of telomere binding proteins and telomere length on replicative capacity in yeast may have significant implications for our understanding of cellular senescence in higher organisms.     

Binding of Multiple Rap1 Proteins Stimulates Chromosome Breakage Induction during DNA Replication

Telomeres, the ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes, have a specialized chromatin structure that provides a stable chromosomal terminus. In budding yeast Rap1 protein binds to telomeric TG repeat and negatively regulates telomere length. Here we show that binding of multiple Rap1 proteins stimulates DNA double-stranded break (DSB) induction at both telomeric and non-telomeric regions. Consistent with the role of DSB induction, Rap1 stimulates nearby recombination events in a dosage-dependent manner. Rap1 recruits Rif1 and Rif2 to telomeres, but neither Rif1 nor Rif2 is required for DSB induction. Rap1-mediated DSB induction involves replication fork progression but inactivation of checkpoint kinase Mec1 does not affect DSB induction. Rap1 tethering shortens artificially elongated telomeres in parallel with telomerase inhibition, and this telomere shortening does not require homologous recombination. These results suggest that Rap1 contributes to telomere homeostasis by promoting chromosome breakage.     

Fission yeast Rhp51 is required for the maintenance of telomere structure in the absence of the Ku heterodimer

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Ku70–Ku80 heterodimer is required for telomere length regulation. Lack of pku70⁺ results in telomere shortening and striking rearrangements of telomere-associated sequences. We found that the rearrangements of telomere-associated sequences in pku80⁺ mutants are Rhp51 dependent, but not Rad50 dependent. Rhp51 bound to telomere ends when the Ku heterodimer was not present at telomere ends. We also found that the single-stranded G-rich tails increased in S phase in wild-type strains, while deletion of pku70⁺ increased the single-stranded overhang in both G₂ and S phase. Based on these observations, we propose that Rhp51 binds to the G-rich overhang and promotes homologous pairing between two different telomere ends in the absence of Ku heterodimer. Moreover, pku80 rhp51 double mutants showed a significantly reduced telomere hybridization signal. Our results suggest that, although Ku heterodimer sequesters Rhp51 from telomere ends to inhibit homologous recombination activity, Rhp51 plays important roles for the maintenance of telomere ends in the absence of the Ku heterodimer.     

“Poisoning” yeast telomeres distinguishes between redundant telomere capping pathways

In most eukaryotes, telomeres are composed of tandem arrays of species-specific DNA repeats ending with a G-rich 3′ overhang. In budding yeast, Cdc13 binds this overhang and recruits Ten1–Stn1 and the telomerase protein Est1 to protect (cap) and elongate the telomeres, respectively. To dissect and study the various pathways employed to cap and maintain the telomere end, we engineered telomerase to incorporate Tetrahymena telomeric repeats (G₄T₂) onto the telomeres of the budding yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. These heterologous repeats caused telomere–telomere fusions, cell cycle arrest at G2/M, and severely reduced viability—the hallmarks of telomere uncapping. Fusing Cdc13 or Est1 to universal minicircle sequence binding protein (UMSBP), a small protein that binds the single-stranded G₄T₂ repeats, rescued the cell viability and restored telomere capping, but not telomerase-mediated telomere maintenance. Surprisingly, Cdc13–UMSBP-mediated telomere capping was dependent on the homologous recombination factor Rad52, while Est1–UMSBP was not. Thus, our results distinguish between two, redundant, telomere capping pathways.     

Coordinated Interactions of Multiple POT1-TPP1 Proteins with Telomere DNA

Telomeres are macromolecular nucleoprotein complexes that protect the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes from degradation, end-to-end fusion events, and from engaging the DNA damage response. However, the assembly of this essential DNA-protein complex is poorly understood. Telomere DNA consists of the repeated double-stranded sequence 5′-TTAGGG-3′ in vertebrates, followed by a single-stranded DNA overhang with the same sequence. Both double- and single-stranded regions are coated with high specificity by telomere end-binding proteins, including POT1 and TPP1, that bind as a heterodimer to single-stranded telomeric DNA. Multiple POT1-TPP1 proteins must fully coat the single-stranded telomere DNA to form a functional telomere. To better understand the mechanism of multiple binding, we mutated or deleted the two guanosine nucleotides residing between adjacent POT1-TPP1 recognition sites in single-stranded telomere DNA that are not required for multiple POT1-TPP1 binding events. Circular dichroism demonstrated that spectra from the native telomere sequence are characteristic of a G-quadruplex secondary structure, whereas the altered telomere sequences were devoid of these signatures. The altered telomere strands, however, facilitated more cooperative loading of multiple POT1-TPP1 proteins compared with the wild-type telomere sequence. Finally, we show that a 48-nucleotide DNA with a telomere sequence is more susceptible to nuclease digestion when coated with POT1-TPP1 proteins than when it is left uncoated. Together, these data suggest that POT1-TPP1 binds telomeric DNA in a coordinated manner to facilitate assembly of the nucleoprotein complexes into a state that is more accessible to enzymatic activity.     

Sequential Loading of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku and Cdc13p to Telomeres

Ku is a heterodimeric protein involved in nonhomologous end-joining of the DNA double-stranded break repair pathway. It binds to the double-stranded DNA ends and then activates a series of repair enzymes that join the broken DNA. In addition to its function in DNA repair, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku (Yku) is also a component of telomere protein-DNA complexes that affect telomere function. The yeast telomeres are composed of duplex C_1–3(A/T)G_1–3 telomeric DNA repeats plus single-stranded TG_1–3 telomeric DNA tails. Here we show that Yku is capable of binding to a tailed-duplex DNA formed by telomeric DNA that mimics the structure of telomeres. Addition of Cdc13p, a single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding protein, to the Yku-DNA complex enables the formation of a ternary complex with Cdc13p binding to the single-stranded tail of the DNA substrate. Because pre-loading of Cdc13p to the single-stranded telomeric tail inhibits the binding of Yku, the results suggested that loading of Yku and Cdc13p to telomeres is sequential. Through generating a double-stranded break near telomeric DNA sequences, we found that Ku protein appears to bind to the de novo synthesized telomeres earlier than that of Cdc13p in vivo. Thus, our results indicated that Yku interacts directly with telomeres and that sequential loading of Yku followed by Cdc13p to telomeres is required for both proteins to form a ternary complex on telomeres. Our results also offer a mechanism that the binding of Cdc13p to telomeres might prevent Yku from initiating DNA double-stranded break repair pathway on telomeres.DNA damages in the form of double-stranded breaks (DSBs)⁴ compromise the integrity of genomes. Failure in repairing or mis-repairing double-stranded breaks can lead to chromosome instability and eventually cell death or cancer (1). Double-stranded breaks are repaired by two main pathways, the homologous recombination and nonhomologous DNA end-joining. In nonhomologous DNA end-joining, Ku is the first protein to bind to the DNA ends to initiate the repair pathway (2). Upon binding, Ku then recruits a series of repair enzymes to join the broken ends (2). Ku is a heterodimeric protein composed of 70- and ∼80-kDa subunits. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ku includes Yku70 and Yku80 subunits. Because the biochemical configuration of the broken ends could be very diverse on DSBs, Ku binds to double-stranded ends in a sequence- and energy-independent manner. It is capable of binding to DNA ends with blunt 3′-overhangs or 5′-overhangs as well as double-stranded DNA with nicks, gaps, or internal loops (3–7). However, Ku does not have high affinity to single-stranded DNA. The crystal structure of human Ku heterodimer indicates that it forms a ring structure that encircles duplex DNA (7). This unique structure feature enables Ku to recognize DNA ends and achieves its high affinity binding.In additional to the role in double-stranded break repair, Ku was shown to be a component of telomeric protein-DNA complex in yeast and mammals (8–10). Telomeres are terminal structures of chromosomes composed of short tandem repeated sequences (11, 12). Mutation of YKU70 or YKU80 causes defects in telomere structure (13–15), telomere silencing (16–19), and replication timing of telomeres (20). The function of yeast Ku (Yku) on telomeres could mediate through protein-protein interaction with Sir4p or protein-RNA interaction with Tlc1 RNA (21, 22). For example, through the interaction with Sir4p, Yku selectively affects telomeres silencing but not the silent mating type loci (17). Yku could also bind to telomerase Tlc1 RNA for telomere length maintenance (22). Judged by the DNA binding activity of Yku, it is reasonable to suggest that it may bind directly to telomeric DNA. Indeed, it was shown that human Ku is capable of binding directly to telomeric DNA in vitro (15). Moreover, because the deletion of SIR4 in budding yeast (23) or Taz1 in fission yeast (24) does not abolish the association of Ku with chromosomal ends, this suggests that Ku might bind directly to telomeric DNA in cells. However, because yeast telomeres have a short 12–14-mer single-stranded tail (25), it is uncertain whether Yku could pass the single-stranded region to reach its binding site. The direct binding of Yku to telomeric DNA has not been experimentally determined.In contrast to double-stranded breaks, the ends of linear chromosomes are not recognized by repair enzymes as DNA damage. In S. cerevisiae, Cdc13p is the single-stranded TG_1–3 DNA-binding protein that enables cells to differentiate whether the ends of a linear DNA are telomeres or broken ends (26–29). Thus, although the mechanism of how cells prevent the activation of DSB repair pathway in telomere is unclear, it is likely that binding of Cdc13p to telomeres might inhibit the initiation of DNA damage response by the Ku protein. Here, using a tailed-duplex DNA synthesized by telomeric DNA sequences to mimic telomere structure, we showed that Yku binds directly to this tailed-duplex DNA substrate and forms a ternary complex with Cdc13p. Our results also showed that Yku loaded to a de novo synthesized telomere earlier than Cdc13p in vivo. These results support the direct binding of Yku to telomeric DNA and that the spatial orientation of Cdc13p might block the activation of DSB repair pathway on telomeres.     

Telomere-end processing: mechanisms and regulation

Telomeres are specialized nucleoprotein complexes that provide protection to the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes. Telomeric DNA consists of tandemly repeated G-rich sequences that terminate with a 3′ single-stranded overhang, which is important for telomere extension by the telomerase enzyme. This structure, as well as most of the proteins that specifically bind double and single-stranded telomeric DNA, are conserved from yeast to humans, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying telomere identity are based on common principles. The telomeric 3′ overhang is generated by different events depending on whether the newly synthesized strand is the product of leading- or lagging-strand synthesis. Here, we review the mechanisms that regulate these processes at Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian telomeres.     

The Pif1 family helicase Pfh1 facilitates telomere replication and has an RPA-dependent role during telomere lengthening

Pif1 family helicases are evolutionary conserved 5′–3′ DNA helicases. Pfh1, the sole Schizosaccharomyces pombe Pif1 family DNA helicase, is essential for maintenance of both nuclear and mitochondrial DNAs. Here we show that its nuclear functions include roles in telomere replication and telomerase action. Pfh1 promoted semi-conservative replication through telomeric DNA, as replication forks moved more slowly through telomeres when Pfh1 levels were reduced. Unlike other organisms, S. pombe cells overexpressing Pfh1 displayed markedly longer telomeres. Because this lengthening occurred in the absence of homologous recombination but not in a replication protein A mutant (rad11-D223Y) that has defects in telomerase function, it is probably telomerase-mediated. The effects of Pfh1 on telomere replication and telomere length are likely direct as Pfh1 exhibited high telomere binding in cells expressing endogenous levels of Pfh1. These findings argue that Pfh1 is a positive regulator of telomere length and telomere replication.