A P-loop Mutation in G�� Subunits Prevents Transition to the Active State: Implications for G-protein Signaling in Fungal Pathogenesis

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are molecular switches integral to a panoply of different physiological responses that many organisms make to environmental cues. The switch from inactive to active Gαβγ heterotrimer relies on nucleotide cycling by the Gα subunit: exchange of GTP for GDP activates Gα, whereas its intrinsic enzymatic activity catalyzes GTP hydrolysis to GDP and inorganic phosphate, thereby reverting Gα to its inactive state. In several genetic studies of filamentous fungi, such as the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, a G42R mutation in the phosphate-binding loop of Gα subunits is assumed to be GTPase-deficient and thus constitutively active. Here, we demonstrate that Gα(G42R) mutants are not GTPase deficient, but rather incapable of achieving the activated conformation. Two crystal structure models suggest that Arg-42 prevents a typical switch region conformational change upon Gα_i1(G42R) binding to GDP·AlF₄ ⁻ or GTP, but rotameric flexibility at this locus allows for unperturbed GTP hydrolysis. Gα(G42R) mutants do not engage the active state-selective peptide KB-1753 nor RGS domains with high affinity, but instead favor interaction with Gβγ and GoLoco motifs in any nucleotide state. The corresponding Gα_q(G48R) mutant is not constitutively active in cells and responds poorly to aluminum tetrafluoride activation. Comparative analyses of M. oryzae strains harboring either G42R or GTPase-deficient Q/L mutations in the Gα subunits MagA or MagB illustrate functional differences in environmental cue processing and intracellular signaling outcomes between these two Gα mutants, thus demonstrating the in vivo functional divergence of G42R and activating G-protein mutants.     

G��i and G�¦� Jointly Regulate the Conformations of a G�¦� Effector, the Neuronal G Protein-activated K+ Channel (GIRK)

Stable complexes among G proteins and effectors are an emerging concept in cell signaling. The prototypical Gβγ effector G protein-activated K⁺ channel (GIRK; Kir3) physically interacts with Gβγ but also with Gα_i/o. Whether and how Gα_i/o subunits regulate GIRK in vivo is unclear. We studied triple interactions among GIRK subunits 1 and 2, Gα_i3 and Gβγ. We used in vitro protein interaction assays and in vivo intramolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (i-FRET) between fluorophores attached to N and C termini of either GIRK1 or GIRK2 subunit. We demonstrate, for the first time, that Gβγ and Gα_i3 distinctly and interdependently alter the conformational states of the heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel. Biochemical experiments show that Gβγ greatly enhances the binding of GIRK1 subunit to Gα_i3^GDP and, unexpectedly, to Gα_i3^GTP. i-FRET showed that both Gα_i3 and Gβγ induced distinct conformational changes in GIRK1 and GIRK2. Moreover, GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits assumed unique, distinct conformations when coexpressed with a “constitutively active” Gα_i3 mutant and Gβγ together. These conformations differ from those assumed by GIRK1 or GIRK2 after separate coexpression of either Gα_i3 or Gβγ. Both biochemical and i-FRET data suggest that GIRK acts as the nucleator of the GIRK-Gα-Gβγ signaling complex and mediates allosteric interactions between Gα_i^GTP and Gβγ. Our findings imply that Gα_i/o and the Gα_iβγ heterotrimer can regulate a Gβγ effector both before and after activation by neurotransmitters.     

Activator of G Protein Signaling 8 (AGS8) Is Required for Hypoxia-induced Apoptosis of Cardiomyocytes: ROLE OF G�¦� AND CONNEXIN 43 (CX43)*

Ischemic injury of the heart is associated with activation of multiple signal transduction systems including the heterotrimeric G-protein system. Here, we report a role of the ischemia-inducible regulator of Gβγ subunit, AGS8, in survival of cardiomyocytes under hypoxia. Cultured rat neonatal cardiomyocytes (NCM) were exposed to hypoxia or hypoxia/reoxygenation following transfection of AGS8siRNA or pcDNA::AGS8. Hypoxia-induced apoptosis of NCM was completely blocked by AGS8siRNA, whereas overexpression of AGS8 increased apoptosis. AGS8 formed complexes with G-proteins and channel protein connexin 43 (CX43), which regulates the permeability of small molecules under hypoxic stress. AGS8 initiated CX43 phosphorylation in a Gβγ-dependent manner by providing a scaffold composed of Gβγ and CX43. AGS8siRNA blocked internalization of CX43 following exposure of NCM to repetitive hypoxia; however it did not influence epidermal growth factor-mediated internalization of CX43. The decreased dye flux through CX43 that occurred with hypoxic stress was also prevented by AGS8siRNA. Interestingly, the Gβγ inhibitor Gallein mimicked the effect of AGS8 knockdown on both the CX43 internalization and the changes in cell permeability elicited by hypoxic stress. These data indicate that AGS8 is required for hypoxia-induced apoptosis of NCM, and that AGS8-Gβγ signal input increased the sensitivity of cells to hypoxic stress by influencing CX43 regulation and associated cell permeability. Under hypoxic stress, this unrecognized response program plays a critical role in the fate of NCM.     

Evolution,Expression Differentiation and Interaction Specificity of Heterotrimeric G-Protein Subunit Gene Family in the Mesohexaploid Brassica rapa

Heterotrimeric G-proteins, comprising of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are important signal transducers which regulate many aspects of fundamental growth and developmental processes in all eukaryotes. Initial studies in model plants Arabidopsis and rice suggest that the repertoire of plant G-protein is much simpler than that observed in metazoans. In order to assess the consequence of whole genome triplication events within Brassicaceae family, we investigated the multiplicity of G-protein subunit genes in mesohexaploid Brassica rapa, a globally important vegetable and oilseed crop. We identified one Gα (BraA.Gα1), three Gβ (BraA.Gβ1, BraA.Gβ2, and BraA.Gβ3), and five Gγ (BraA.Gγ1, BraA.Gγ2, BraA.Gγ3, BraA.Gγ4, and BraA.Gγ5) genes from B. rapa, with a possibility of 15 Gαβγ heterotrimer combinations. Our analysis suggested that the process of genome triplication coupled with gene-loss (gene-fractionation) phenomenon have shaped the quantitative and sequence diversity of G-protein subunit genes in the extant B. rapa genome. Detailed expression analysis using qRT-PCR assays revealed that the G-protein genes have retained ubiquitous but distinct expression profiles across plant development. The expression of multiple G-protein genes was differentially regulated during seed-maturation and germination stages, and in response to various phytohormone treatments and stress conditions. Yeast-based interaction analysis showed that G-protein subunits interacted in most of the possible combinations, with some degree of subunit-specific interaction specificity, to control the functional selectivity of G-protein heterotrimer in different cell and tissue-types or in response to different environmental conditions. Taken together, this research identifies a highly diverse G-protein signaling network known to date from B. rapa, and provides a clue about the possible complexity of G-protein signaling networks present across globally important Brassica species.     

Evidence for a Second, High Affinity G�¦� Binding Site on G��i1(GDP) Subunits

It is well known that Gα_i1(GDP) binds strongly to Gβγ subunits to form the Gα_i1(GDP)-Gβγ heterotrimer, and that activation to Gα_i1(GTP) results in conformational changes that reduces its affinity for Gβγ subunits. Previous studies of G protein subunit interactions have used stoichiometric amounts of the proteins. Here, we have found that Gα_i1(GDP) can bind a second Gβγ subunit with an affinity only 10-fold weaker than the primary site and close to the affinity between activated Gα_i1 and Gβγ subunits. Also, we find that phospholipase Cβ2, an effector of Gβγ, does not compete with the second binding site implying that effectors can be bound to the Gα_i1(GDP)-(Gβγ)₂ complex. Biophysical measurements and molecular docking studies suggest that this second site is distant from the primary one. A synthetic peptide having a sequence identical to the putative second binding site on Gα_i1 competes with binding of the second Gβγ subunit. Injection of this peptide into cultured cells expressing eYFP-Gα_i1(GDP) and eCFP-Gβγ reduces the overall association of the subunits suggesting this site is operative in cells. We propose that this second binding site serves to promote and stabilize G protein subunit interactions in the presence of competing cellular proteins.The plasma membranes of cells are organized as a series of protein-rich and lipid-rich domains (1–3). Many of the protein-rich domains, in particular those organized by caveolin proteins, are thought to be complexes of functionally related proteins that transduce extracellular signals (2). There is increasing evidence that heterotrimeric G proteins exist in pre-formed membrane complexes with their receptors and their intracellular effectors (4–8).The G protein signaling system is initiated when an extracellular agonist binds to its specific G protein-coupled receptor (for review see Refs. 9–12). The ligand-bound receptor will then catalyze the exchange of GTP for GDP on the Gα subunit in the G protein heterotrimer. In the basal state, Gα(GDP) binds strongly to Gβγ, but in the GTP-bound state this affinity is reduced, allowing Gα(GTP) and Gβγ subunits to individually bind to a host of specific intracellular enzymes and change their catalytic activity.Although the interactions between G protein subunits have been studied extensively in vitro, their behavior in cells may differ. For example, in pure or semi-pure systems, activation of Gα(GDP) sufficiently weakens its affinity for Gβγ resulting in dissociation (13). However, in cells separation of the heterotrimer is observed under some circumstances, but not others (7, 14–17). The reason for these differences in behavior is not clear. There are four families of Gα subunits that each contain several members, and, additionally, there are many subtypes of Gβγ subunits (18). It is possible that differences in dissociation behavior reflect differences in affinity between G protein subunit subtypes (19), the presence of various protein partners, and/or differences in post-synthetic modifications of the subunits (20).The mechanism that allows activated G proteins to remain bound is not apparent from the crystal structure (21, 22). If G protein subunits do not dissociate in cells, then their interaction must change in such a manner as to expose the effector interaction site(s). We have found that phospholipase Cβ1 (PLCβ1),⁴ an important effector of Gα_q (23), is bound to Gα_q prior to activation and throughout the activation cycle (6) implying that Gα_q(GDP) interacts with PLCβ1 in a non-functional manner.We have evidence that signaling complexes are stabilized by a series of secondary interactions. Using purified proteins and model membranes, we have found that membranes of the Gα_q-Gβγ/PLCβ1/RGS4 signaling system have secondary, weaker binding sites to members of this signaling system in addition to their high affinity site(s) to their functional partner(s). We speculate that secondary contacts allow for self-scaffolding of signaling proteins. To understand the nature of these secondary contacts, we have studied the ability of the Gα_i1(GDP)-Gβγ heterotrimer to remain complexed through the activation cycle (24). Here, we present evidence that Gα_i1(GDP) has two distinct Gβγ binding sites that only differ in affinity by an order of magnitude and may allow for continued association between the subunits upon activation. We also find that this site plays an important role in stabilizing G protein associations in cells and provides a mechanism of self-scaffolding.     

Differential Inhibitor of G�¦� Signaling to AKT and ERK Derived from Phosducin-like Protein: EFFECT ON SPHINGOSINE 1-PHOSPHATE-INDUCED ENDOTHELIAL CELL MIGRATION AND IN VITRO ANGIOGENESIS*

Differential inhibitors of Gβγ-effector regions are required to dissect the biological contribution of specific Gβγ-initiated signaling pathways. Here, we characterize PhLP-M1-G149, a Gβγ-interacting construct derived from phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP) as a differential inhibitor of Gβγ, which, in endothelial cells, prevented sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced phosphorylation of AKT, glycogen synthase kinase 3β, cell migration, and tubulogenesis, while having no effect on ERK phosphorylation or hepatocyte growth factor-dependent responses. This construct attenuated the recruitment of phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ (PI3Kγ) to the plasma membrane and the signaling to AKT in response to Gβγ overexpression. In coimmunoprecipitation experiments, PhLP-M1-G149 interfered with the interaction between PI3Kγ and Gβγ. Other PhLP-derived constructs interacted with Gβγ but were not effective inhibitors of Gβγ signaling to AKT or ERK. Our results indicate that PhLP-M1-G149 is a suitable tool to differentially modulate the Gβγ-initiated pathway linking this heterodimer to AKT, endothelial cell migration, and in vitro angiogenesis. It can be also useful to further characterize the molecular determinants of the Gβγ-PI3Kγ interaction.Heterotrimeric G protein signaling depends on the actions of GTP-loaded Gα and free Gβγ, the two functional components of the heterotrimer, leading to the generation of second messengers and cell specific functional events (1, 2). Differential inhibitors of Gβγ are required to dissect the biological impact of different Gβγ-dependent effectors. Gβγ actions can be blocked by competition with peptides derived from its effectors. For example, the effect of Gβγ on adenylyl cyclase II, G protein-activated inward rectifier K⁺ channel, G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, and phospholipase Cβ3, is attenuated by a peptide from adenylyl cyclase II (3). In addition, RACK1 (receptor for activated C kinase 1) selectively inhibits the effect the chemokine receptor CXCR2 on the activation of phospholipase Cβ2 and adenylyl cyclase II in HEK293 cells, without affecting other functions of Gβγ (4). Recently, Smrcka and colleagues characterized the effect of small molecule inhibitors of Gβγ, suggesting their potential application in therapeutic strategies targeting particular Gβγ-dependent pathways (5). Emerging possibilities to target this heterodimer in pathological situations such as inflammation and angiogenesis are based on the role of Gβγ in cell survival and chemotaxis. To the best of our knowledge, no molecular tool is yet available to differentially inhibit Gβγ signaling to AKT.³Gβγ is a key transducer of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)-elicited angiogenic signals promoting endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and survival (6–12). Multiple Gβγ-dependent effectors are potentially involved in the molecular events required for endothelial cell migration. These include lipid kinases such as PI3Kγ and PI3Kβ (13), and a novel family of Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factors, represented by P-REX1, which is activated by Gβγ and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (14–16). Gβγ signaling is frequently attributed to pertussis toxin-sensitive G_i coupled receptors, and it has been consistently revealed by the antagonistic effect of the carboxyl-terminal region of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, which sequesters Gβγ thereby inhibiting all its intracellular actions (17). In addition, mutational analysis of Gβ revealed that different residues, all of them mapping to the interface of contact between Gβγ and Gα, are important for the activation of distinct Gβγ effector molecules (18).Phosducin was originally identified as a phosphoprotein restricted to the retina and pineal gland forming a complex with Gβγ (19, 20). It was considered a protein kinase A-sensitive regulator of G protein-mediated signaling (21, 22). Further studies identified a family of phosducin-like proteins (PhLPs) (23, 24). Phosducin and Gα share affinity for the same region of Gβγ, as revealed by the structural analysis of Gβγ in complex with Gα or phosducin and by in vitro binding experiments (25). This area of interaction includes some of the residues considered necessary for the activation of Gβγ-dependent effectors (18, 26). It was initially postulated that phosducin and related proteins, by interfering with the availability of free Gβγ, exert an inhibitory role on Gβγ signaling. However, recent genetic evidence raised an apparently conflicting situation; the knockout of PhLP in fungi resulted in a phenotype equivalent to the absence of Gβγ, contrary to its expected role as an inhibitor (27). Novel experimental evidence indicated that PhLP has a positive effect on Gβγ signaling due to its participation in the assembly of the heterodimer, helping to stabilize free Gβ subunits leaving the ribosome after synthesis (28–31).Despite the positive role of full-length PhLP in the assembly of Gβγ heterodimers, it is still possible that different fragments of this protein, which could retain their interaction with distinct regions of Gβγ, might function as inhibitors of Gβγ signaling. Accordingly, we characterized here the effect of different PhLP-derived constructs on the signaling pathways elicited by S1P or HGF in endothelial cells. In addition, we explored the mechanism by which PhLP-M1-G149 interferes with Gβγ preventing the activation of AKT.     

Specific interaction of Gαi3 with the Oa1 G-protein coupled receptor controls the size and density of melanosomes in retinal pigment epithelium

Background

Ocular albinism type 1, an X-linked disease characterized by the presence of enlarged melanosomes in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and abnormal crossing of axons at the optic chiasm, is caused by mutations in the OA1 gene. The protein product of this gene is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) localized in RPE melanosomes. The Oa1-/- mouse model of ocular albinism reproduces the human disease. Oa1 has been shown to immunoprecipitate with the Gαi subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins from human skin melanocytes. However, the Gαi subfamily has three highly homologous members, Gαi1, Gαi2 and Gαi3 and it is possible that one or more of them partners with Oa1. We had previously shown by in-vivo studies that Gαi3-/- and Oa1-/- mice have similar RPE phenotype and decussation patterns. In this paper we analyze the specificity of the Oa1-Gαi interaction.

Methodology

By using the genetic mouse models Gαi1-/-, Gαi2-/-, Gαi3-/- and the double knockout Gαi1-/-, Gαi3-/- that lack functional Gαi1, Gαi2, Gαi3, or both Gαi1 and Gαi3 proteins, respectively, we show that Gαi3 is critical for the maintenance of a normal melanosomal phenotype and that its absence is associated with changes in melanosomal size and density. GST-pull-down and immunoprecipitation assays conclusively demonstrate that Gαi3 is the only Gαi that binds to Oa1. Western blots show that Gαi3 expression is barely detectable in the Oa1-/- RPE, strongly supporting a previously unsuspected role for Gαi3 in melanosomal biogenesis.

Conclusion

Our results identify the Oa1 transducer Gαi3 as the first downstream component in the Oa1 signaling pathway.     

G Protein �¦� Subunits Regulate Cell Adhesion through Rap1a and Its Effector Radil

The activation of several G protein-coupled receptors is known to regulate the adhesive properties of cells in different contexts. Here, we reveal that Gβγ subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins regulate cell-matrix adhesiveness by activating Rap1a-dependent inside-out signals and integrin activation. We show that Gβγ subunits enter in a protein complex with activated Rap1a and its effector Radil and establish that this complex is required downstream of receptor stimulation for the activation of integrins and the positive modulation of cell-matrix adhesiveness. Moreover, we demonstrate that Gβγ and activated Rap1a promote the translocation of Radil to the plasma membrane at sites of cell-matrix contacts. These results add to the molecular understanding of how G protein-coupled receptors impinge on cell adhesion and suggest that the Gβγ·Rap1·Radil complex plays important roles in this process.     

Phosphorylation of Protease-activated Receptor-2 Differentially Regulates Desensitization and Internalization

Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is a G protein-coupled receptor irreversibly activated by extracellular proteases. Activated PAR2 couples to multiple heterotrimeric G-protein subtypes including Gα_q, Gα_i, and Gα_12/13. Most activated G protein-coupled receptors are rapidly desensitized and internalized following phosphorylation and β-arrestin binding. However, the role of phosphorylation in regulation of PAR2 signaling and trafficking is not known. To investigate the function of phosphorylation, we generated a PAR2 mutant in which all serines and threonines in the C-tail were converted to alanines and designated it PAR2 0P. In mammalian cells, the addition of agonist induced a rapid and robust increase in phosphorylation of wild-type PAR2 but not the 0P mutant, suggesting that the major sites of phosphorylation occur within the C-tail domain. Moreover, desensitization of PAR2 0P signaling was markedly impaired compared with the wild-type receptor. Wild-type phosphorylated PAR2 internalized through a canonical dynamin, clathrin- and β-arrestin-dependent pathway. Strikingly, PAR2 0P mutant internalization proceeded through a dynamin-dependent but clathrin- and β-arrestin-independent pathway in both a constitutive and agonist-dependent manner. Collectively, our studies show that PAR2 phosphorylation is essential for β-arrestin binding and uncoupling from heterotrimeric G-protein signaling and that the presence of serine and threonine residues in the PAR2 C-tail hinder constitutive internalization through a non-canonical pathway. Thus, our studies reveal a novel function for phosphorylation that differentially regulates PAR2 desensitization and endocytic trafficking.     

Structural Determinants of G-protein �� Subunit Selectivity by Regulator of G-protein Signaling 2 (RGS2)

“Regulator of G-protein signaling” (RGS) proteins facilitate the termination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling via their ability to increase the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rate of Gα subunits (known as GTPase-accelerating protein or “GAP” activity). RGS2 is unique in its in vitro potency and selectivity as a GAP for Gα_q subunits. As many vasoconstrictive hormones signal via G_q heterotrimer-coupled receptors, it is perhaps not surprising that RGS2-deficient mice exhibit constitutive hypertension. However, to date the particular structural features within RGS2 determining its selectivity for Gα_q over Gα_i/o substrates have not been completely characterized. Here, we examine a trio of point mutations to RGS2 that elicits Gα_i-directed binding and GAP activities without perturbing its association with Gα_q. Using x-ray crystallography, we determined a model of the triple mutant RGS2 in complex with a transition state mimetic form of Gα_i at 2.8-Å resolution. Structural comparison with unliganded, wild type RGS2 and of other RGS domain/Gα complexes highlighted the roles of these residues in wild type RGS2 that weaken Gα_i subunit association. Moreover, these three amino acids are seen to be evolutionarily conserved among organisms with modern cardiovascular systems, suggesting that RGS2 arose from the R4-subfamily of RGS proteins to have specialized activity as a potent and selective Gα_q GAP that modulates cardiovascular function.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)⁴ form an interface between extracellular and intracellular physiology, as they convert hormonal signals into changes in intracellular metabolism and ultimately cell phenotype and function (1–3). GPCRs are coupled to their underlying second messenger systems by heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (“G-proteins”) composed of three subunits: Gα, Gβ, and Gγ. Four general classes of Gα subunits have been defined based on functional couplings (in the GTP-bound state) to various effector proteins. G_s subfamily Gα subunits are stimulatory to membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases that generate the second messenger 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP); conversely, G_i subfamily Gα subunits are generally inhibitory to adenylyl cyclases (4). G_12/13 subfamily Gα subunits activate the small G-protein RhoA through stimulation of the GEF subfamily of RGS proteins, namely p115-RhoGEF, LARG, and PDZ-RhoGEF (5). G_q subfamily Gα subunits are potent activators of phospholipase-Cβ enzymes that generate the second messengers diacylglycerol and inositol triphosphate (6); more recently, two additional Gα_q effector proteins have been described: the receptor kinase GRK2 and the RhoA nucleotide exchange factor p63RhoGEF (7, 8).The duration of GPCR signaling is controlled by the time Gα remains bound to GTP before its hydrolysis to GDP. RGS proteins are key modulators of GPCR signaling by virtue of their ability to accelerate the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis activity of Gα subunits (reviewed in Refs. 9 and 10). RGS2/G0S8, one of the first mammalian RGS proteins identified (11) and member of the R4-subfamily (10), has a critical role in the maintenance of normostatic blood pressure both in mouse models (12, 13) and in humans (14, 15); additionally, Rgs2-deficient mice exhibit impaired aggression and increased anxiety (16, 17), behavioral phenotypes with potential human clinical correlates (18, 19).Although many RGS proteins are promiscuous and thus act on multiple Gα substrates in vitro (e.g. Ref. 20), RGS2 exhibits exquisite specificity for Gα_q in biochemical binding assays and single turnover GTPase acceleration assays (20, 21). Consistent with this in vitro selectivity,⁵ mice deficient in RGS2 uniquely exhibit constitutive hypertension and prolonged responses to vasoconstrictors, as would be expected upon loss of a potent negative regulator of Gα_q that mediates signaling from various vasoconstrictive hormones such as angiotensin II, endothelin, thrombin, norepinephrine, and vasopressin (22). In addition, RGS2-deficient mice respond to sustained pressure overload with an accelerated time course of maladaptive cardiac remodeling (23), a pathophysiological response that evokes myocardial hypertrophy known to be critically dependent on Gα_q signaling (24, 25).To gain insight into the structural basis of the unique Gα substrate selectivity exhibited by RGS2, a series of point mutants in RGS2 were evaluated that enable this protein to bind and accelerate GTP hydrolysis by Gα_i; we subsequently delineated the structural determinants of the Gα_i/mutant RGS2 interaction using x-ray crystallography. Three key positions, first identified by Heximer and colleagues (21) and highlighted in our structural studies as key determinants of RGS2 substrate selection, were also found to be conserved throughout the evolution of the RGS2 protein in a manner suggestive of specialization toward cardiovascular signaling modulation.     

Yeast G-proteins mediate directional sensing and polarization behaviors in response to changes in pheromone gradient direction

Yeast cells polarize by projecting up mating pheromone gradients, a classic cell polarity behavior. However, these chemical gradients may shift direction. We examine how yeast cells sense and respond to a 180^o switch in the direction of microfluidically generated pheromone gradients. We identify two behaviors: at low concentrations of α-factor, the initial projection grows by bending, whereas at high concentrations, cells form a second projection toward the new source. Mutations that increase heterotrimeric G-protein activity expand the bending-growth morphology to high concentrations; mutations that increase Cdc42 activity result in second projections at low concentrations. Gradient-sensing projection bending requires interaction between Gβγ and Cdc24, whereas gradient-nonsensing projection extension is stimulated by Bem1 and hyperactivated Cdc42. Of interest, a mutation in Gα affects both bending and extension. Finally, we find a genetic perturbation that exhibits both behaviors. Overexpression of the formin Bni1, a component of the polarisome, makes both bending-growth projections and second projections at low and high α-factor concentrations, suggesting a role for Bni1 downstream of the heterotrimeric G-protein and Cdc42 during gradient sensing and response. Thus we demonstrate that G-proteins modulate in a ligand-dependent manner two fundamental cell-polarity behaviors in response to gradient directional change.     

Gβγ and the C terminus of SNAP-25 are necessary for long-term depression of transmitter release

Background

Short-term presynaptic inhibition mediated by G protein-coupled receptors involves a direct interaction between G proteins and the vesicle release machinery. Recent studies implicate the C terminus of the vesicle-associated protein SNAP-25 as a molecular binding target of Gβγ that transiently reduces vesicular release. However, it is not known whether SNAP-25 is a target for molecular modifications expressing long-term changes in transmitter release probability.

Methodology/Principal Findings

This study utilized two-photon laser scanning microscopy for real-time imaging of action potential-evoked [Ca²⁺] increases, in single Schaffer collateral presynaptic release sites in in vitro hippocampal slices, plus simultaneous recording of Schaffer collateral-evoked synaptic potentials. We used electroporation to infuse small peptides through CA3 cell bodies into presynaptic Schaffer collateral terminals to selectively study the presynaptic effect of scavenging the G-protein Gβγ. We demonstrate here that the C terminus of SNAP-25 is necessary for expression of LTD, but not long-term potentiation (LTP), of synaptic strength. Using type A botulinum toxin (BoNT/A) to enzymatically cleave the 9 amino acid C-terminus of SNAP-25 eliminated the ability of low frequency synaptic stimulation to induce LTD, but not LTP, even if release probability was restored to pre-BoNT/A levels by elevating extracellular [Ca²⁺]. Presynaptic electroporation infusion of the 14-amino acid C-terminus of SNAP-25 (Ct-SNAP-25), to scavenge Gβγ, reduced both the transient presynaptic inhibition produced by the group II metabotropic glutamate receptor stimulation, and LTD. Furthermore, presynaptic infusion of mSIRK, a second, structurally distinct Gβγ scavenging peptide, also blocked the induction of LTD. While Gβγ binds directly to and inhibit voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels, imaging of presynaptic [Ca²⁺] with Mg-Green revealed that low-frequency stimulation only transiently reduced presynaptic Ca²⁺ influx, an effect not altered by infusion of Ct-SNAP-25.

Conclusions/Significance

The C-terminus of SNAP-25, which links synaptotagmin I to the SNARE complex, is a binding target for Gβγ necessary for both transient transmitter-mediated presynaptic inhibition, and the induction of presynaptic LTD.     

Role of Molecular Chaperones in G Protein ��5/Regulator of G Protein Signaling Dimer Assembly and G Protein �¦� Dimer Specificity

The G protein βγ subunit dimer (Gβγ) and the Gβ5/regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) dimer play fundamental roles in propagating and regulating G protein pathways, respectively. How these complexes form dimers when the individual subunits are unstable is a question that has remained unaddressed for many years. In the case of Gβγ, recent studies have shown that phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) works as a co-chaperone with the cytosolic chaperonin complex (CCT) to fold Gβ and mediate its interaction with Gγ. However, it is not known what fraction of the many Gβγ combinations is assembled this way or whether chaperones influence the specificity of Gβγ dimer formation. Moreover, the mechanism of Gβ5-RGS assembly has yet to be assessed experimentally. The current study was undertaken to directly address these issues. The data show that PhLP1 plays a vital role in the assembly of Gγ2 with all four Gβ1–4 subunits and in the assembly of Gβ2 with all twelve Gγ subunits, without affecting the specificity of the Gβγ interactions. The results also show that Gβ5-RGS7 assembly is dependent on CCT and PhLP1, but the apparent mechanism is different from that of Gβγ. PhLP1 seems to stabilize the interaction of Gβ5 with CCT until Gβ5 is folded, after which it is released to allow Gβ5 to interact with RGS7. These findings point to a general role for PhLP1 in the assembly of all Gβγ combinations and suggest a CCT-dependent mechanism for Gβ5-RGS7 assembly that utilizes the co-chaperone activity of PhLP1 in a unique way.Eukaryotic cells utilize receptors coupled to heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins)³ to mediate a vast array of responses ranging from nutrient-induced migration of single-celled organisms to neurotransmitter-regulated neuronal activity in the human brain (1). Ligand binding to a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) initiates GTP exchange on the G protein heterotrimer (composed of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits), which in turn causes the release of Gα-GTP from the Gβγ dimer (2–4). Both Gα-GTP and Gβγ propagate and amplify the signal by interacting with effector enzymes and ion channels (1, 5). The duration and amplitude of the signal is dictated by receptor phosphorylation coupled with arrestin binding and internalization (6) and by regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which serve as GTPase-activating proteins for the GTP-bound Gα subunit (7, 8). The G protein signaling cycle is reset as the inactive Gα-GDP reassembles with the Gβγ dimer and Gαβγ re-associates with the GPCR (5).To fulfill its essential role in signaling, the G protein heterotrimer must be assembled post-translationally from its nascent polypeptides. Significant progress has been made recently regarding the mechanism by which this process occurs. It has been clear for some time that the Gβγ dimer must assemble first, followed by subsequent association of Gα with Gβγ (9). What has not been clear was how Gβγ assembly would occur given the fact that neither Gβ nor Gγ is structurally stable without the other. An important breakthrough was the finding that phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) functions as a co-chaperone with the chaperonin containing tailless complex polypeptide 1 (CCT) in the folding of nascent Gβ and its association with Gγ (10–15). CCT is an important chaperone that assists in the folding of actin and tubulin and many other cytosolic proteins, including many β propeller proteins like Gβ (16). PhLP1 has been known for some time to interact with Gβγ and was initially believed to inhibit Gβγ function (17). However, several recent studies have demonstrated that PhLP1 and CCT work together in a highly orchestrated manner to form the Gβγ dimer (10–15).Studies on the mechanism of PhLP1-mediated Gβγ assembly have focused on the most common dimer Gβ1γ2 (10, 13, 14), leaving open questions about the role of PhLP1 in the assembly of the other Gβγ combinations. These are important considerations given that humans possess 5 Gβ genes and 12 Gγ genes with some important splice variants (18, 19), resulting in more than 60 possible combinations of Gβγ dimers. Gβ1–4 share between 80 and 90% sequence identity and are broadly expressed (18, 19). Gβ5, the more atypical isoform, shares only ∼53% identity with Gβ1, carries a longer N-terminal domain, and is only expressed in the central nervous system and retina (20). The Gγ protein family is more heterogeneous than the Gβ family. The sequence identity of the 12 Gγ isoforms extends from 10 to 70% (21), and the Gγ family can be separated into 5 subfamilies (21–23). All Gγ proteins carry C-terminal isoprenyl modifications, which contribute to their association with the cell membrane, GPCRs, Gαs, and effectors (9). Subfamily I Gγ isoforms are post-translationally farnesylated, whereas all others are geranylgeranylated (22, 24).There is some inherent selectivity in the assembly of different Gβγ combinations, but in general Gβ1–4 can form dimers with most Gγ subunits (25). The physiological purpose of this large number of Gβγ combinations has intrigued researchers in the field for many years, and a large body of research indicates that GPCRs and effectors couple to a preferred subset of Gβγ combinations based somewhat on specific sequence complementarity, but even more so on cellular expression patterns, subcellular localization, and post-translational modifications (18).In contrast to Gβ1–4, Gβ5 does not interact with Gγ subunits in vivo, but it instead forms irreversible dimers with RGS proteins of the R7 family, which includes RGS proteins 6, 7, 9, and 11 (26). All R7 family proteins contain an N-terminal DEP (disheveled, Egl-10, pleckstrin) domain, a central Gγ-like (GGL) domain, and a C-terminal RGS domain (8, 26). The DEP domain interacts with the membrane anchoring/nuclear shuttling R7-binding protein, and the GGL domain binds to Gβ5 in a manner similar to other Gβγ associations (27, 28). Like Gβγs, Gβ5 and R7 RGS proteins form obligate dimers required for their mutual stability (26). Without their partner, Gβ5 and R7 RGS proteins are rapidly degraded in cells (26, 29). Gβ5-R7 RGS complexes act as important GTPase-accelerating proteins for G_i/oα and G_qα subunits in neuronal cells and some immune cells (26).It has been recently shown that all Gβ isoforms are able to interact with the CCT complex, but to varying degrees (15). Gβ4 and Gβ1 bind CCT better than Gβ2 and Gβ3, whereas Gβ5 binds CCT poorly (15). These results suggest that Gβ1 and Gβ4 might be more dependent on PhLP1 than the other Gβs, given the co-chaperone role of PhLP1 with CCT in Gβ1γ2 assembly. However, another report has indicated that Gγ2 assembly with Gβ1 and Gβ2 is more PhLP1-dependent than with Gβ3 and Gβ4 (30). Thus, it is not clear from current information whether PhLP1 and CCT participate in assembly of all Gβγ combinations or whether they contribute to the specificity of Gβγ dimer formation, nor is it clear whether they or other chaperones are involved in Gβ5-R7 RGS dimer formation. This report was designed to address these issues.     

Activation of Leukemia-associated RhoGEF by G��13 with Significant Conformational Rearrangements in the Interface

The transient protein-protein interactions induced by guanine nucleotide-dependent conformational changes of G proteins play central roles in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling systems. Leukemia-associated RhoGEF (LARG), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rho, contains an RGS homology (RH) domain and Dbl homology/pleckstrin homology (DH/PH) domains and acts both as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and an effector for Gα₁₃. However, the molecular mechanism of LARG activation upon Gα₁₃ binding is not yet well understood. In this study, we analyzed the Gα₁₃-LARG interaction using cellular and biochemical methods, including a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis. The results obtained using various LARG fragments demonstrated that active Gα₁₃ interacts with LARG through the RH domain, DH/PH domains, and C-terminal region. However, an alanine substitution at the RH domain contact position in Gα₁₃ resulted in a large decrease in affinity. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that binding of Gα₁₃ proceeds with a large negative heat capacity change (ΔCp°), accompanied by a positive entropy change (ΔS°). These results likely indicate that the binding of Gα₁₃ with the RH domain triggers conformational rearrangements between Gα₁₃ and LARG burying an exposed hydrophobic surface to create a large complementary interface, which facilitates complex formation through both GAP and effector interfaces, and activates the RhoGEF. We propose that LARG activation is regulated by an induced-fit mechanism through the GAP interface of Gα₁₃.Heterotrimeric G proteins³ serve as key molecular switches to transduce a large array of extracellular signals into cells by actively alternating their conformations between GDP-bound inactive and GTP-bound active forms. In the current model, the ligand-activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) catalyze the exchange of GDP for GTP on Gα subunits (1). Upon activation, three switch regions in the Gα subunit undergo significant conformational changes, followed by dissociation of the GTP-bound Gα subunit from the Gβγ subunits. Both Gα-GTP and free Gβγ interact with diverse downstream effectors to transmit intracellular signals. The Gα subunit hydrolyzes bound GTP to GDP by its intrinsic GTPase activity. This deactivation process is further accelerated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) such as regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins (2, 3). Gα-GDP dissociates from effectors and re-associates with Gβγ to terminate the signal.Although this model explains the basic concept of G protein signaling, the molecular dynamics of interactions among GPCR, G protein, RGS protein, and effector during the signaling process is not well understood. It has been suggested that the GPCR signals are integrated into the intracellular signaling network at the level of G proteins (4). Accumulating evidence suggests that the Gα subunit acts as the core of the signaling complex at the membrane, which is formed through the transient protein-protein interactions of multiple signaling components (5, 6). Thus, the quantitative analysis of the dynamic molecular interactions in the GPCR signaling complex will be crucial to understanding various cellular processes.Gα₁₂ and Gα₁₃ subunits have been demonstrated to regulate the activity of Rho GTPase through RhoGEFs, which contain an N-terminal RGS homology domain (RH-RhoGEFs) (7–10). RH-RhoGEFs, which consist of p115RhoGEF/Lsc, PDZ-Rho-GEF/GTRAP48, and LARG in mammalian species, directly link the activation of GPCRs by extracellular ligands to the regulation of Rho activity in cells (10–14). All three RH-RhoGEFs contain an N-terminal RH domain, which specifically recognizes the active form of Gα₁₂ or Gα₁₃ and central DH/PH domains characteristic of GEFs for Rho GTPases. It has been demonstrated in vitro that LARG and p115RhoGEF serve as specific GAPs for Gα_12/13 through their RH domains and also as their effectors to regulate Rho GTPase activation (11–13). A structural study has demonstrated that the interface of the RH domain of p115RhoGEFs and a Gα_13/i1 chimera is different from that of the RGS domain of RGS4 and Gα_i1 (7). The N-terminal small element in the RH domain, which is required for GAP activity toward Gα₁₃, contacts the switch regions and the helical domain of the Gα_13/i1 chimera. The core module of the p115RhoGEF RH domain binds to the region of Gα_13/i1, which is conventionally used for effector binding. These results suggest roles for the RH domain in the stimulation of GEF activity by Gα₁₃ in addition to GAP activity. On the other hand, several studies have also indicated that regions outside of RH domain of RH-RhoGEFs, particularly the DH/PH domains, interact directly with activated Gα₁₃ (11, 14, 15). In addition, we have demonstrated recently that p115RhoGEF interacts with distinct surfaces of Gα₁₃ for the GAP reaction or GEF activity regulation (16). However, the molecular mechanism of LARG activation upon Gα₁₃ binding is not clearly understood.In this study, we have developed a quantitative method for the kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of Gα₁₃-effector interaction using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with sensor chips on which Gα₁₃ was immobilized. We examined the kinetics and thermodynamics of the Gα₁₃-LARG interaction and assessed LARG activation using both in vitro and cell-based approaches. We present evidence that, in addition to the interaction with the RH domain, the DH/PH domains and C-terminal region of LARG also interact with Gα₁₃ to form the high affinity Gα₁₃-LARG complex and activate RhoGEF activity. We further propose that LARG adopts the active conformation using an induced-fit mechanism through association with the GAP interface of Gα₁₃. A similar mechanism may also be used with other Gα-effector interactions.     

The Loss of RGS Protein-Gαi2 Interactions Results in Markedly Impaired Mouse Neutrophil Trafficking to Inflammatory Sites

Neutrophils are first responders rapidly mobilized to inflammatory sites by a tightly regulated, nonredundant hierarchy of chemoattractants. These chemoattractants engage neutrophil cell surface receptors triggering heterotrimeric G-protein Gα_i subunits to exchange GDP for GTP. By limiting the duration that Gα_i subunits remain GTP bound, RGS proteins modulate chemoattractant receptor signaling. Here, we show that neutrophils with a genomic knock in of a mutation that disables regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS)-Gα_i2 interactions accumulate in the bone marrow and mobilize poorly to inflammatory sites. These defects are attributable to enhanced sensitivity to background signals, prolonged chemoattractant receptor signaling, and inappropriate CXCR2 downregulation. Intravital imaging revealed a failure of the mutant neutrophils to accumulate at and stabilize sites of sterile inflammation. Furthermore, these mice could not control a nonlethal Staphylococcus aureus infection. Neutrophil RGS proteins establish a threshold for Gα_i activation, helping to coordinate desensitization mechanisms. Their loss renders neutrophils functionally incompetent.     

Gαi2- and Gαi3-specific regulation of voltage-dependent L-type calcium channels in cardiomyocytes

Background

Two pertussis toxin sensitive G_i proteins, G_i2 and G_i3, are expressed in cardiomyocytes and upregulated in heart failure. It has been proposed that the highly homologous G_i isoforms are functionally distinct. To test for isoform-specific functions of G_i proteins, we examined their role in the regulation of cardiac L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels (L-VDCC).

Methods

Ventricular tissues and isolated myocytes were obtained from mice with targeted deletion of either Gα_i2 (Gα_i2 ^−/−) or Gα_i3 (Gα_i3 ^−/−). mRNA levels of Gα_i/o isoforms and L-VDCC subunits were quantified by real-time PCR. Gα_i and Ca_vα₁ protein levels as well as protein kinase B/Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation levels were assessed by immunoblot analysis. L-VDCC function was assessed by whole-cell and single-channel current recordings.

Results

In cardiac tissue from Gα_i2 ^−/− mice, Gα_i3 mRNA and protein expression was upregulated to 187±21% and 567±59%, respectively. In Gα_i3 ^−/− mouse hearts, Gα_i2 mRNA (127±5%) and protein (131±10%) levels were slightly enhanced. Interestingly, L-VDCC current density in cardiomyocytes from Gα_i2 ^−/− mice was lowered (−7.9±0.6 pA/pF, n = 11, p<0.05) compared to wild-type cells (−10.7±0.5 pA/pF, n = 22), whereas it was increased in myocytes from Gα_i3 ^−/− mice (−14.3±0.8 pA/pF, n = 14, p<0.05). Steady-state inactivation was shifted to negative potentials, and recovery kinetics slowed in the absence of Gα_i2 (but not of Gα_i3) and following treatment with pertussis toxin in Gα_i3 ^−/−. The pore forming Ca_vα₁ protein level was unchanged in all mouse models analyzed, similar to mRNA levels of Ca_vα₁ and Ca_vβ₂ subunits. Interestingly, at the cellular signalling level, phosphorylation assays revealed abolished carbachol-triggered activation of ERK1/2 in mice lacking Gα_i2.

Conclusion

Our data provide novel evidence for an isoform-specific modulation of L-VDCC by Gα_i proteins. In particular, loss of Gα_i2 is reflected by alterations in channel kinetics and likely involves an impairment of the ERK1/2 signalling pathway.     

Clinical, hematologic and molecular variability of sickle cell-β thalassemia in western India

BACKGROUND:

Sickle cell-β thalassemia (HbS-β thalassemia) is a sickling disorder of varying severity, which results from compound heterozygosity for sickle cell trait and β thalassemia trait. The present study was undertaken to determine the genetic factors responsible for the clinical variability of HbS-β thalassemia patients from western India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Twenty-one HbS-β thalassemia cases with variable clinical manifestations were investigated. The α and β globin gene clusters were studied by molecular analysis.

RESULTS:

Thirteen patients showed milder clinical presentation as against eight patients who had severe clinical manifestations. Four β thalassemia mutations were identified: IVS 1-5 (G→C), codon 15 (G→A), codon 30 (G→C) and codon 8/9 (+G). α thalassemia and XmnI polymorphism in homozygous condition (+/+) were found to be common among the milder cases. The β^S chromosomes were linked to the typical Arab-Indian haplotype (#31). Framework (FW) linkage studies showed that four β thalassemia mutations were associated with different β globin gene frameworks. Linkage of codon 15 (G→A) mutation to FW2 is being observed for the first time.

CONCLUSION:

The phenotypic expression of HbS-β thalassemia is not uniformly mild and α thalassemia and XmnI polymorphism in homozygous condition (+/+) are additional genetic factors modulating the severity of the disease in the Indian subcontinent.