Sec61p and BiP directly facilitate polypeptide translocation into the ER.

Secretory proteins are segregated from cytosolic proteins by their translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). A modified secretory protein trapped during translocation across the ER membrane can be crosslinked to two previously identified proteins, Sec61p and BiP (Kar2p). The dependence of this cross-linking upon proteins and small molecules was examined. Mutations in SEC62 and SEC63 decrease the ability of Sec61p to be cross-linked to the secretory polypeptide trapped in translocation. ATP is also required for interaction of Sec61p with the secretory protein. Three kar2 alleles display defective translocation in vitro. Two of these alleles also decrease the ability of Sec61p to be cross-linked to the secretory protein. The third allele, while exhibiting a severe translocation defect, does not affect the interaction of Sec61p with the secretory protein. These results suggest that Sec61p is directly involved in translocation and that BiP acts at two stages of the translocation cycle.     

A budding and fusing journey through the secretory pathway. Genetic and In Vitro Analysis of Cell Compartmentalization: A UCLA symposium, Taos, NM, USA, February 3-9, 1990

Reconstitution of vesicular transport events and the molecular and genetic analysis of the secretory pathway have taken the field of membrane traffic into a new era. Already, proteins have been discovered that facilitate multiple transport steps, and studies of the identities and modes of action of additional transport components, such as those that specify the targets of transport vesicles, will soon follow. Even after we understand how transport vesicles form, find their targets, and then fuse, other fundamental questions will still remain. How are proteins sorted into distinct transport vesicles? How is the directionality of protein transport achieved? How do organelles maintain their identities in the face of large volumes of membrane traffic? Finally, how is membrane traffic regulated? Answers to each of these fundamental questions are likely to be available in the not-too-distant future.     

Distinct domains within yeast Sec61p involved in post-translational translocation and protein dislocation

The translocation of secretory polypeptides into and across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) occurs at the translocon, a pore-forming structure that orchestrates the transport and maturation of polypeptides at the ER membrane. Recent data also suggest that misfolded or unassembled polypeptides exit the ER via the translocon for degradation by the cytosolic ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Sec61p is a highly conserved multispanning membrane protein that constitutes a core component of the translocon. We have found that the essential function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sec61p is retained upon deletion of either of two internal regions that include transmembrane domains 2 and 3, respectively. However, a deletion mutation encompassing both of these domains was found to be nonfunctional. Characterization of yeast mutants expressing the viable deletion alleles of Sec61p has revealed defects in post-translational translocation. In addition, the transmembrane domain 3 deletion mutant is induced for the unfolded protein response and is defective in the dislocation of a misfolded ER protein. These data demonstrate that the various activities of Sec61p can be functionally dissected. In particular, the transmembrane domain 2 region plays a role in post-translational translocation that is required neither for cotranslational translocation nor for protein dislocation.     

Transport of proteins in eukaryotic cells: more questions ahead

Some newly synthesized proteins contain signals that direct their transport to their final location within or outside of the cell. Targeting signals are recognized by specific protein receptors located either in the cytoplasm or in the membrane of the target organelle. Specific membrane protein complexes are involved in insertion and translocation of polypeptides across the membranes. Often, additional targeting signals are required for a polypeptide to be further transported to its site of function. In this review, we will describe the trafficking of proteins to various cellular organelles (nucleus, chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes) with emphasis on transport to and through the secretory pathway.     

Elongation arrest is not a prerequisite for secretory protein translocation across the microsomal membrane

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein consisting of six distinct polypeptides and one molecule of small cytoplasmic 7SL RNA. It was previously shown to promote the co-translational translocation of secretory proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum by (a) arresting the elongation of the presecretory nascent chain at a specific point, and (b) interacting with the SRP receptor, an integral membrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum which is active in releasing the elongation arrest. Recently a procedure was designed by which the particle could be disassembled into its protein and RNA components. We have further separated the SRP proteins into four homogeneous fractions. When recombined with each other and with 7SL RNA, they formed fully active SRP. Particles missing specific proteins were assembled in the hope that some of these would retain some functional activity. SRP(-9/14), the particle lacking the 9-kD and 14-kD polypeptides, was fully active in promoting translocation, but was completely inactive in elongation arrest. This implied that elongation arrest is not a prerequisite for protein translocation. SRP receptor was required for SRP(-9/14)-mediated translocation to occur, and thus must play some role in the translocation process in addition to releasing the elongation arrest.     

The role of the mature part of secretory proteins in translocation across the plasma membrane and in regulation of their synthesis in Escherichia coli

Presently available data are reviewed which concern the role of the mature parts of secretory precursor proteins in translocation across the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli. The following conclusions can be drawn; i) signals, acting in a positive fashion and required for translocation do not appear to exist in the mature polypeptides; ii) a number of features have been identified which either affect the efficiency of translocation or cause export incompatibility. These are: alpha) protein folding prior to translocation; beta) restrictions regarding the structure of N-terminus; gamma) presence of lipophilic anchors; delta) too low a size of the precursor. Efficiency of translocation is also enhanced by binding of chaperonins (SecB, trigger factor, GroEL) to precursors. Binding sites for chaperonins appear to exist within the mature parts of the precursors but the nature of these sites has remained rather mysterious. Mutant periplasmic proteins with a block in release from the plasma membrane have been described, the mechanism of this block is not known. The mature parts of secretory proteins can also be involved in the regulation of their synthesis. It appears that exported proteins are already recognized as such before they are channelled into the export pathway and that their synthesis can be feed-back inhibited at the translational level.     

Unraveling the components of protein translocation pathway in human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum

The targeting and translocation of proteins is an essentially required and conserved process in all the living organisms. This complex process involves multiple steps and requires a variety of factors before the protein reaches its final destination. The major components of translocation machinery are signal recognition particle (SRP) and secretory (Sec) complex. These are composed of highly conserved components. SRP contains SRP RNA and other polypeptides such as SRP9, SRP14, SRP19 and SRP54. Sec complex is composed of Sec61αβγ, Sec62 and Sec63. In this review using bioinformatics approach we have shown that the P. falciparum genome contains the homologues for all of these and other factors such as SRP receptor, and TRAM (translocation associated membrane protein), which are required for post- and co-translational protein translocation. We have also shown the various steps of translocation in a hypothetical model.     

Multiple genes are required for proper insertion of secretory proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum in yeast

Genes that function in translocation of secretory protein precursors into the ER have been identified by a genetic selection for mutant yeast cells that fail to translocate a signal peptide-cytosolic enzyme hybrid protein. The new mutants, sec62 and sec63, are thermosensitive for growth and accumulate a variety of soluble secretory and vacuolar precursors whose electrophoretic mobilities coincide with those of the corresponding in vitro translated polypeptides. Proteolytic sensitivity of precursor molecules in extracts of mutant cells confirms that polypeptide translocation is blocked. Some form of interaction among the SEC61 (Deshaies, R. J., and R. Schekman. 1987. J. Cell Biol. 105:633-645), SEC62 and SEC63 gene products is suggested by the observation that haploid cells containing any pair of the mutations are inviable at 24 degrees C and show a marked enhancement of the translocation defect. The translocation defects of two mutants (sec62 and sec63) have been reproduced in vitro. sec63 microsomes display low and thermolabile translocation activity for prepro-alpha-factor (pp alpha F) synthesized with a cytosol fraction from wild type yeast. These gene products may constitute part of the polypeptide recognition or translocation apparatus of the ER membrane. Pulse-chase analysis of the translocation-defective mutants demonstrates that insertion of pp alpha F into the ER can proceed posttranslationally.     

How probable are antibody cross-reactions?

Antibodies to polypeptides are increasingly being used in research. Their specificity and tight but reversible binding make them ideal for applications such as identification of proteins, immunological quantification or purification, and peptide mapping. Antibodies are also used in medicine to deliver loads to specific sites in tissues, and in electron microscopy as heavy metal conjugates to locate antigens in thin sections. While these techniques depend on specificity of antibody binding, it is occasionally observed that cross-reactions occur. These cross-reactions are attributed to the existence of one or more antibody binding sites common to both polypeptides. It is important to know whether these cross-reactions are expected due to chance alone, or if they are improbable and likely due to some causative agent. Examples of such causative agents might include gene duplication events or convergence due to functional constraints. At the present time, good methods for predicting the probability and therefore the frequency of cross-reactions are unavailable. In this paper we apply some recently reported mathematical results to address the following questions: (1) What is the probability that polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies raised against a given polypeptide will cross-react with another polypeptide due to chance alone? (2) What is the probability that polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies raised against a given polypeptide will cross-react with one or more polypeptides in a pool of polypeptides? Approximate answers to these questions are presented for cases where amino acid compositions of linear polypeptides are known or unknown, but the amino acid sequence of one or more of the polypeptides is not known. Implications of the results for antibody use in protein research are discussed.     

Structural and functional characterization of Sec66p, a new subunit of the polypeptide translocation apparatus in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum.

SEC66 encodes the 31.5-kDa glycoprotein of the Sec63p complex, an integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex required for translocation of presecretory proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA sequence analysis of SEC66 predicts a 23-kDa protein with no obvious NH2-terminal signal sequence but with one domain of sufficient length and hydrophobicity to span a lipid bilayer. Antibodies directed against a recombinant form of Sec66p were used to confirm the membrane location of Sec66p and that Sec66p is a glycoprotein of 31.5 kDa. A null mutation in SEC66 renders yeast cells temperature sensitive for growth. sec66 cells accumulate some secretory precursors at a permissive temperature and a variety of precursors at the restrictive temperature. sec66 cells show defects in Sec63p complex formation. Because sec66 cells affect the translocation of some, but not all secretory precursor polypeptides, the role of Sec66p may be to interact with the signal peptide of presecretory proteins.     

Genetic analysis of clathrin function in yeast

The use of yeast mutants to study the function and dynamics of clathrin-coated membranes has offered new insights into clathrin's role in the secretory pathway and has raised additional questions. Most strains of yeast can incur a disruption of clathrin heavy or light chain genes and remain viable. However, in rare cases, alleles of genes other than clathrin affect the viability of clathrin-deficient cells. The relationship of the products of these genes to clathrin awaits clarification. Phenotypic characterization of clathrin-deficient yeast mutants suggests that clathrin is not essential for the generation of secretory pathway transport vesicles at the ER or the Golgi complex but is required for the intracellular retention of a Golgi membrane protein, Kex2p. With this genetic evidence for clathrin's function in vivo, biochemical and genetic experiments can be designed to address the mechanism by which clathrin effects retention of Kex2p. Clathrin-deficient yeast carry out protein secretion, receptor-mediated endocytosis of mating pheromone, and efficient targeting of newly synthesized vacuolar proteins. These observations challenge aspects of clathrin's proposed involvement in protein transport through the secretory pathway and to lysosomes in mammalian cells. However, the differences are beginning to recede in the face of additional experiments; the formation of clathrin coated vesicles is no longer commonly thought to be obligately coupled to transport through the secretory pathway in mammalian cells (Rothman 1986; Brodsky, 1988), and the role of clathrin in retaining a Golgi membrane protein in yeast may have its precedents in receptor-mediated endocytosis by mammalian cells or in secretory granule formation in endocrine cells. A unified theory of clathrin function is emerging (Brodsky, 1988) which suggests that the clathrin coat assemblage (clathrin heavy and light chains and the associated proteins) acts as a facilitator of intracellular protein transport by sorting and concentrating cargo molecules. The results from studies of clathrin-deficient yeast support this theory. Future experiments will determine whether clathrin provides its functions at different transport stages in different organisms or whether all eukaryotic cells employ clathrin at the same stages of intracellular protein transport.     

The Signal Sequence Influences Post-Translational ER Translocation at Distinct Stages

The metazoan Sec61 translocon transports polypeptides into and across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum via two major routes, a well-established co-translational pathway and a post-translational alternative. We have used two model substrates to explore the elements of a secretory protein precursor that preferentially direct it towards a co- or post-translational pathway for ER translocation. Having first determined the capacity of precursors to enter ER derived microsomes post-translationally, we then exploited semi-permeabilized mammalian cells specifically depleted of key membrane components using siRNA to address their contribution to the membrane translocation process. These studies suggest precursor chain length is a key factor in the post-translational translocation at the mammalian ER, and identify Sec62 and Sec63 as important components acting on this route. This role for Sec62 and Sec63 is independent of the signal sequence that delivers the precursor to the ER. However, the signal sequence can influence the subsequent membrane translocation process, conferring sensitivity to a small molecule inhibitor and dictating reliance on the molecular chaperone BiP. Our data support a model where secretory protein precursors that fail to engage the signal recognition particle, for example because they are short, are delivered to the ER membrane via a distinct route that is dependent upon both Sec62 and Sec63. Although this requirement for Sec62 and Sec63 is unaffected by the specific signal sequence that delivers a precursor to the ER, this region can influence subsequent events, including both Sec61 mediated transport and the importance of BiP for membrane translocation. Taken together, our data suggest that an ER signal sequence can regulate specific aspects of Sec61 mediated membrane translocation at a stage following Sec62/Sec63 dependent ER delivery.     

A subclass of proteins and sulfated macromolecules secreted by AtT-20 (mouse pituitary tumor) cells is sorted with adrenocorticotropin into dense secretory granules

The AtT-20 cell, a mouse pituitary tumor line that secretes adrenocorticotropin and beta-endorphin, sorts the proteins it externalizes into two exocytotic pathways. Cells that are labeled with [35S]methionine or [35S]sulfate can be shown to transport three acidic polypeptides (65,000, 60,000, and 37,000 mol wt) and at least two sulfated macromolecules into storage secretory granules. When the cells are stimulated by the secretagogue 8-bromo-cAMP, these polypeptides are coordinately secreted with mature adrenocorticotropin into the culture medium. In contrast, a completely different set of secreted polypeptides and sulfated macromolecules does not enter a storage form and is transported to the cell surface more rapidly. Their secretion from the cells is constitutive and does not require the presence of secretagogues. These molecules, like a viral membrane glycoprotein described previously (Gumbiner, B., and R. B. Kelly, 1982, Cell, 28:51-59) are not found in isolated secretory granules and therefore must reach the cell surface in a different exocytotic vesicle. The segregation of a subclass of secretory macromolecules into the secretory granules, despite the existence of another potential secretory pathway, suggests that these molecules have specific functions related to regulated hormone secretion or storage. Presumably all of the proteins secreted by the regulated secretory granule pathway share some common property that targets them to the secretory granule.     

Control of glycosylation of MHC class II-associated invariant chain by translocon-associated RAMP4.

Protein translocation across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) proceeds through a proteinaceous translocation machinery, the translocon. To identify components that may regulate translocation by interacting with nascent polypeptides in the translocon, we used site-specific photo-crosslinking. We found that a region C-terminal of the two N-glycosylation sites of the MHC class II-associated invariant chain (Ii) interacts specifically with the ribosome-associated membrane protein 4 (RAMP4). RAMP4 is a small, tail-anchored protein of 66 amino acid residues that is homologous to the yeast YSY6 protein. YSY6 suppresses a secretion defect of a secY mutant in Escherichia coli. The interaction of RAMP4 with Ii occurred when nascent Ii chains reached a length of 170 amino acid residues and persisted until Ii chain completion, suggesting translocational pausing. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that the region of Ii interacting with RAMP4 contains essential hydrophobic amino acid residues. Exchange of these residues for serines led to a reduced interaction with RAMP4 and inefficient N-glycosylation. We propose that RAMP4 controls modification of Ii and possibly also of other secretory and membrane proteins containing specific RAMP4-interacting sequences. Efficient or variable glycosylation of Ii may contribute to its capacity to modulate antigen presentation by MHC class II molecules.     

Cab45 is required for Ca2+-dependent secretory cargo sorting at the trans-Golgi network

Ca²⁺ import into the lumen of the trans-Golgi network (TGN) by the secretory pathway calcium ATPase1 (SPCA1) is required for the sorting of secretory cargo. How is Ca²⁺ retained in the lumen of the Golgi, and what is its role in cargo sorting? We show here that a soluble, lumenal Golgi resident protein, Cab45, is required for SPCA1-dependent Ca²⁺ import into the TGN; it binds secretory cargo in a Ca²⁺-dependent reaction and is required for its sorting at the TGN.     

Without a little help from 'my' friends: direct insertion of proteins into chloroplast membranes?

The chloroplast membranes are highly regulated and biological active regions of the living plant cell, which carry numerous essential proteinaceous components. For example, in the thylakoid membrane the photosynthesis apparatus, one of the most life-relevant biological machineries, is located. How these membrane proteins are targeted to and inserted into their target membranes was one of the questions we aimed to understand in the last few years. Fifteen years ago little to nothing was known about the targeting and translocation of outer envelope proteins (G.W. Schmidt and L.M. Mishkind, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55 (1986)). Although several protein assisted pathways for translocation of proteins across the membranes have been characterised, only recent results gave insight into how membrane proteins are inserted into the chloroplast membranes. Here we will focus on the mode of insertion of a class of proteins into the outer envelope and the thylakoid membranes, which share a unique feature: they insert apparently directly into the lipid bilayer, i.e. without the help of a proteinaceous translocation pore.     

Structure,function and specificity of the DNA packaging signals in double-stranded DNA viruses

The selective packaging of viral DNA into a capsid raises a number of interesting questions. How is the viral DNA specifically selected from the pool of viral and host DNA for packaging? What protein/protein and protein/DNA interactions are involved in this process? Lastly, is the packaging process coordinated with one or more aspects of DNA replication and/or genome maturation? The focus of this review will be on the specific cis-acting elements that direct the selective encapsidation of different prokaryotic and eukaryotic double-stranded viral DNAs. We will focus on prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems that have been analyzed in detail and that have not been reviewed recently in the literature.     

Teaching dolichol-linked oligosaccharides more tricks with alternatives to metabolic radiolabeling

The dolichol cycle involves synthesis of the lipid-linked oligosaccharide (LLO) Glc(3)Man(9)GlcNAc(2)-P-P-dolichol (G(3)M(9)Gn(2)-P-P-Dol), transfer of G(3)M(9)Gn(2) to asparaginyl residues of nascent endoplasmic reticulum (ER) polypeptides by oligosaccharyltransferase (OT), and recycling of the resultant Dol-P-P to Dol-P for new rounds of LLO synthesis. The importance of the dolichol cycle in secretory and membrane protein biosynthesis, ER function, and human genetic disease is now widely accepted. Elucidation of the fundamental properties of the dolichol cycle in intact cells was achieved through the use of radioactive sugar precursors, typically [(3)H]-labeled or [(14)C]-labeled d-mannose, d-galactose, or d-glucosamine. However, difficulties were encountered with cells or tissues not amenable to metabolic labeling, or in experiments influenced by isotope dilution, variable rates of LLO turnover, or special culture conditions required for the use of radioactive sugars. This article will review recently developed alternatives for LLO analysis that do not rely upon metabolic labeling with radioactive precursors, and thereby circumvent these problems. New information revealed by these methods with regard to regulation, genetic disorders, and evolution of the dolichol cycle, as well as caveats of radiolabeling techniques, will be discussed.     

Dog pancreatic microsomal-membrane polypeptides analysed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

The two-dimensional polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis technique of O'Farrell [(1975) J. Biol. Chem 250, 4007-4021] was applied to resolve and analyse the polypeptide composition of dog pancreatic rough microsomal membranes, which were shown to be active in co-translational processing of preprolactin synthesized from pituitary mRNA in a translation system in vitro. About 100 polypeptides are resolved. Treatment of rough microsomal membranes with EDTA and high KCl concentration yielded membranes stripped of their ribosomes with retention of activity for translocation and processing. Stripped microsomal membranes showed a selective concentration of approximately 25 polypeptides in the membranes when analysed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis. The two-dimensional electrophoretic profile was catalogued into polypeptides that are glycoproteins, those that contain free thiol groups disposed at the cytosolic surface of microsomal vesicles and those that are of secretory origin but have been entrapped in the microsomal preparation. Several secretory components, including amylase, procarboxypeptidases, lipase and anionic trypsinogen, were tentatively identified among the microsomal polypeptides. The rough and stripped microsomal membranes from dog pancreas show a characteristic set of seven major acidic polypeptides, which are also identifiable in microsomal-membrane preparations isolated from dog liver and rat liver. One of these polypeptides was identified as protein disulphide-isomerase (EC 5.3.4.1).