Silencing of transgene expression in mammalian cells by DNA methylation and histone modifications in gene therapy perspective

DNA methylation and histone modifications are vital in maintaining genomic stability and modulating cellular functions in mammalian cells. These two epigenetic modifications are the most common gene regulatory systems known to spatially control gene expression. Transgene silencing by these two mechanisms is a major challenge to achieving effective gene therapy for many genetic conditions. The implications of transgene silencing caused by epigenetic modifications have been extensively studied and reported in numerous gene delivery studies. This review highlights instances of transgene silencing by DNA methylation and histone modification with specific focus on the role of these two epigenetic effects on the repression of transgene expression in mammalian cells from integrative and non-integrative based gene delivery systems in the context of gene therapy. It also discusses the prospects of achieving an effective and sustained transgene expression for future gene therapy applications.     

5-azacytidine induces transgene silencing by DNA methylation in Chinese hamster cells

The cytosine analog 5-azacytidine (5-AzaC) is a demethylating agent that is also known to induce mutagenesis in mammalian cells. In this study, the mutagenic potential of this drug was tested in the G10 and G12 transgenic Chinese hamster cell lines, which have a single bacterial gpt gene integrated into the genome at different sites, with its expression driven by a simian virus 40 (SV40) promoter. We show that the mutation frequencies following a 48-h exposure to different concentrations of 5-AzaC were 10 to 20 times higher than those of any of the other numerous mutagens that have been tested in the G10-G12 system. Moreover, the mutation frequencies were much higher in the G10 cell line than in the G12 cells. Detailed molecular analysis of the 6-thioguanine (6-TG)-resistant variants demonstrated that transgene silencing by de novo DNA methylation and increased chromatin condensation in the SV40 promoter was the major factor responsible for this high level of 6-TG resistance. As would be expected, exposure to 5-AzaC lowered the overall genomic DNA methylation levels, but it unexpectedly caused hypermethylation and increased chromatin condensation of the transgene in both the G10 and G12 cell lines. These results provide the first evidence that 5-AzaC may also induce transgene-specific DNA methylation, a phenomenon that can further be used for the elucidation of the mechanism that controls silencing of foreign DNA.     

Dynamic regulation of DNA methylation and histone modifications in response to abiotic stresses in plants

DNA methylation and histone modification are evolutionarily conserved epigenetic modifications that are crucial for the expression regulation of abiotic stress-responsive genes in plants. Dynamic changes in gene expression levels can result from changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications. In the last two decades, how epigenetic machinery regulates abiotic stress responses in plants has been extensively studied. Here, based on recent publications, we review how DNA methylation and histone modifications impact gene expression regulation in response to abiotic stresses such as drought, abscisic acid, high salt, extreme temperature, nutrient deficiency or toxicity, and ultraviolet B exposure. We also review the roles of epigenetic mechanisms in the formation of transgenerational stress memory. We posit that a better understanding of the epigenetic underpinnings of abiotic stress responses in plants may facilitate the design of more stress-resistant or -resilient crops, which is essential for coping with global warming and extreme environments.     

Regulation beyond genome sequences: DNA and histone methylation in embryonic stem cells

Embryonic stem (ES) cells distinct themselves from other cell type populations by their pluripotent ability. The unique features of ES cells are controlled by both genetic and epigenetic factors. Studies have shown that the methylation status of DNA and histones in ES cells is quite different from that of differentiated cells and somatic stem cells. Herein, we summarized recent advances in DNA and histone methylation studies of mammalian ES cells. The methylation status of several key pluripotent regulatory genes is also discussed.     

Chromatin remodeling and bivalent histone modifications in embryonic stem cells

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are characterized by distinct epigenetic features including a relative enrichment of histone modifications related to active chromatin. Among these is tri‐methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4me3). Several thousands of the H3K4me3‐enriched promoters in pluripotent cells also contain a repressive histone mark, namely H3K27me3, a situation referred to as “bivalency”. While bivalent promoters are not unique to pluripotent cells, they are relatively enriched in these cell types, largely marking developmental and lineage‐specific genes which are silent but poised for immediate action. The H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications are catalyzed by lysine methyltransferases which are usually found within, although not entirely limited to, the Trithorax group (TrxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) protein complexes, respectively, but these do not provide selective bivalent specificity. Recent studies highlight the family of ATP‐dependent chromatin remodeling proteins as regulators of bivalent domains. Here, we discuss bivalency in general, describe the machineries that catalyze bivalent chromatin domains, and portray the emerging connection between bivalency and the action of different families of chromatin remodelers, namely INO80, esBAF, and NuRD, in pluripotent cells. We posit that chromatin remodeling proteins may enable “bivalent specificity”, often selectively acting on, or selectively depleted from, bivalent domains.     

DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are pluripotent, self‐renewing cells. These cells can be used in applications such as cell therapy, drug development, disease modeling, and the study of cellular differentiation. Investigating the interplay of epigenetics, genetics, and gene expression in control of pluripotence and differentiation could give important insights on how these cells function. One of the best known epigenetic factors is DNA methylation, which is a major mechanism for regulation of gene expression. This phenomenon is mostly seen in imprinted genes and X‐chromosome inactivation where DNA methylation of promoter regions leads to repression of gene expression. Differential DNA methylation of pluripotence‐associated genes such as Nanog and Oct4/Pou5f1 has been observed between pluripotent and differentiated cells. It is clear that tight regulation of DNA methylation is necessary for normal development. As more associations between aberrant DNA methylation and disease are reported, the demand for high‐throughput approaches for DNA methylation analysis has increased. In this article, we highlight these methods and discuss recent DNA methylation studies on ESCs. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 1–6, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Quantitative analysis of retroviral and lentiviral gene transfer to murine embryonic stem cells

The effectiveness of retrovirus or lentivirus transduction of embryonic stem (ES) cells is often limited because transgene expression is silenced or variegated. We wondered if other steps of transduction, in addition to gene expression, were restricted in ES cells. We quantitatively compared (1) the amount of virus binding, (2) the number of integrated transgenes, and (3) the resulting level of gene expression. We found that three- to fourfold fewer retroviruses and lentiviruses bound to R1 mES cells than to NIH 3T3 cells, suggesting that both types of viruses bind less efficiently to mES cells. Retroviruses and lentiviruses differed in the efficiency with which they completed post-binding steps of transduction. In R1 mES cells, we detected 3-fold fewer integrated retrovirus transgenes and 11-fold lower expression levels than in NIH 3T3 cells, which suggests that the primary limitation to retrovirus transduction may be low levels of transgene expression. In contrast, we detected 10-fold fewer integrated lentivirus transgenes and 8-fold lower expression levels in R1 mES cells than in NIH 3T3 cells, which suggests that lentivirus transduction may be limited by inefficient intracellular post-binding steps of transduction. The implications of our findings for developing improved viral vectors for transducing mES cells are discussed.     

Gene silencing and endogenous DNA methylation in mammalian cells

It is known that transformed mammalian cells can spontaneously inactivate genes at low frequency by the de novo methylation of promoter sequences. It is usually assumed that this is due to DNA methyl transferase activity, but an alternative possibiity is that 5-methyldCTP is present in these cells and can be directly incorporated into DNA. The ongoing repair of DNA containing 5-methylcytosine will produce 5-methyldeoxycytidine monophosphate (5-methyldCMP), so the question arises whether this can be phosphorylated to 5-methyldCTP. We have tested this using three strains of CHO cells with different levels of 5-methyldCMP deaminase activity. That with the lowest enzyme activity, designated HAM⁻, has previously been shown to incorporate tritium labelled 5-methyldeoxycytidine into 5-methylcytosine in DNA, with a greater amount of label in thymine. This strain is phenotypically unstable producing cells resistant to bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) at high frequency. In contrast, the strain with the highest 5-methyldCMP deaminease, designated HAM⁺, is extremely stable, and the starting strain K1 HAM^s1 is intermediate between the HAM⁻ and HAM⁺ phenotypes. We have also shown that human diploid fibroblast strain MRC-5 has a phenotype like HAM⁺, whereas its SV40 transformed derivative, MRC-5V2 resembles HAM⁻ in having low 5-methyl dCMP deaminase activity, and is phenotypically unstable with regard to 6-TG resistance. It seems that 5-methyldCMP deaminase can be down-regulated in transformed cells, and this can promote de novo methylation by incorporation of 5-methyldCTP derived from 5-methyldCMP.     

Epigenetic interplay of histone modifications and DNA methylation mediated by HDA6

One of the most fundamental questions in the control of gene expression is how epigenetic patterns of DNA methylation and histone modifications are established. Our recent studies demonstrate that histone deacetylase HDA6 integrates DNA methylation and histone modifications in gene silencing by interacting with DNA methyltransferase MET1 and histone demethylase FLD, suggesting that regulatory crosstalk between histone modifications and DNA methylation could be mediated by the interaction of various epigenetic modification proteins.     

The role of DNA methylation,nucleosome occupancy and histone modifications in paramutation

Paramutation is the transfer of epigenetic information between alleles that leads to a heritable change in expression of one of these alleles. Paramutation at the tissue‐specifically expressed maize (Zea mays) b1 locus involves the low‐expressing B′ and high‐expressing B‐I allele. Combined in the same nucleus, B′ heritably changes B‐I into B′. A hepta‐repeat located 100‐kb upstream of the b1 coding region is required for paramutation and for high b1 expression. The role of epigenetic modifications in paramutation is currently not well understood. In this study, we show that the B′ hepta‐repeat is DNA‐hypermethylated in all tissues analyzed. Importantly, combining B′ and B‐I in one nucleus results in de novo methylation of the B‐I repeats early in plant development. These findings indicate a role for hepta‐repeat DNA methylation in the establishment and maintenance of the silenced B′ state. In contrast, nucleosome occupancy, H3 acetylation, and H3K9 and H3K27 methylation are mainly involved in tissue‐specific regulation of the hepta‐repeat. Nucleosome depletion and H3 acetylation are tissue‐specifically regulated at the B‐I hepta‐repeat and associated with enhancement of b1 expression. H3K9 and H3K27 methylation are tissue‐specifically localized at the B′ hepta‐repeat and reinforce the silenced B′ chromatin state. The B′ coding region is H3K27 dimethylated in all tissues analyzed, indicating a role in the maintenance of the silenced B′ state. Taken together, these findings provide insight into the mechanisms underlying paramutation and tissue‐specific regulation of b1 at the level of chromatin structure.     

DNA methylation in mouse embryonic stem cells and development

Mammalian development is associated with considerable changes in global DNA methylation levels at times of genomic reprogramming. Normal DNA methylation is essential for development but, despite considerable advances in our understanding of the DNA methyltransferases, the reason that development fails when DNA methylation is deficient remains unclear. Furthermore, although much is known about the enzymes that cause DNA methylation, comparatively little is known about the mechanisms or significance of active demethylation in early development. In this review, we discuss the roles of the various DNA methyltransferases and their likely functions in development.