Enhanced top-down characterization of histone post-translational modifications

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of core histones work synergistically to fine tune chromatin structure and function, generating a so-called histone code that can be interpreted by a variety of chromatin interacting proteins. We report a novel online two-dimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (2D LC-MS/MS) platform for high-throughput and sensitive characterization of histone PTMs at the intact protein level. The platform enables unambiguous identification of 708 histone isoforms from a single 2D LC-MS/MS analysis of 7.5 µg purified core histones. The throughput and sensitivity of comprehensive histone modification characterization is dramatically improved compared with more traditional platforms.     

Histones H1 and H4 of surface-spread meiotic chromosomes

The chromatin conformation of somatic and meiotic chromosomes is, at least in part, a function of electrostatic nucleosome interactions that are mediated by transient acetylation of the histone H4 N-terminal domain and phosphorylation of histone H1. The distribution of those histones in the chromatin of meiotic chromosomes is reported here. Antibodies to testis-specific histone 1, H1t, detect H1t in the chromatin of mouse meiotic prophase chromosomes only after synapsis and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly is completed and before core separation is initiated. The H1t protein is evenly distributed over euchromatin, heterochromatin and the SC. Antibodies to acetylated lysine residues 5, 12 or 16 of histone H4, indicate that the euchromatin is more acetylated than the centromeric heterochromatin. The pattern is most pronounced for acetylated residue 5 and least for 16. Antibodies to phosphorylated H1 epitopes do not react with chromatin but, instead, recognize the chromosome cores and SCs. Possibly these are not phosphorylated histone H1 epitopes, but SC proteins with similar potentially phosphorylatable sequences such as KTPTK of the synaptic protein Syn1.     

Histone H1

Linker histones of which histone H1 is a representative are a diverse family of architectural proteins within the eukaryotic nucleus. These proteins have a variety of structures, but invariably contain a region enriched in lysine, serine, alanine and profine. All metazoan histone His also include a structured domain that binds to DNA through a helix-turn-helix motif. By binding to the linker DNA flanking the nucleosome core they contribute to the assembly of higher-order chromatin structures. Surprisingly, the use of “knockout” technology to eliminate histone H1 in isolated cells and Xenopus does not prevent the assembly of chromosomes or nuclei, however specific genes are activated or repressed indicative of targeted regulatory functions. A dual role for histone HI in chromatin structure and gene regulation might contribute to epigenetic phenomena in which heritable states of gene activity are maintained through mechanisms independent of gene sequence. This may have important implications for biotechnological and medical research.     

Yeast high mobility group protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin and is evicted during repair of DNA double strand breaks

DNA is packaged into condensed chromatin fibers by association with histones and architectural proteins such as high mobility group (HMGB) proteins. However, this DNA packaging reduces accessibility of enzymes that act on DNA, such as proteins that process DNA after double strand breaks (DSBs). Chromatin remodeling overcomes this barrier. We show here that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMGB protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin as evidenced by faster chromatin remodeling in its absence. HMO1 was evicted along with core histones during repair of DSBs, and chromatin remodeling events such as histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 eviction were faster in absence of HMO1. The facilitated chromatin remodeling in turn correlated with more efficient DNA resection and recruitment of repair proteins; for example, inward translocation of the DNA-end-binding protein Ku was faster in absence of HMO1. This chromatin stabilization requires the lysine-rich C-terminal extension of HMO1 as truncation of the HMO1 C-terminal tail phenocopies hmo1 deletion. Since this is reminiscent of the need for the basic C-terminal domain of mammalian histone H1 in chromatin compaction, we speculate that HMO1 promotes chromatin stability by DNA bending and compaction imposed by its lysine-rich domain and that it must be evicted along with core histones for efficient DSB repair.     

Cracking the survival code: Autophagy-related histone modifications

Modifications of histones, the chief protein components of the chromatin, have emerged as critical regulators of life and death. While the “apoptotic histone code” came to light a few years ago, accumulating evidence indicates that autophagy, a cell survival pathway, is also heavily regulated by histone-modifying proteins. In this review we describe the emerging “autophagic histone code” and the role of histone modifications in the cellular life vs. death decision.     

Large scale preparation of nucleosomes containing site-specifically chemically modified histones lacking the core histone tail domains

The core histone tail domains are critical regulators of chromatin structure and function and modifications such as acetylation of lysine residues within the tails are central to this regulation. Studies have shown that the removal of core histone tail domains by trypsinization in which one-half to two-thirds of each core histone tail domain are removed in gross aspects mimics the acetylation of core histone tails. In addition, removal of the tails has been useful in understanding general tail function. Thus, removal of native core histone tails by trypsinization is a widely used method. In addition, many in vitro studies now employ core histones site-specifically modified with photo activatable cross-linking probes or fluorescent probes. However, in our experience, standard methods employing trypsinized donor chromatin for reconstitution of nucleosomes containing certain chemically modified histones lacking the core histone tail domains are not uniformly applicable. Here, we describe various methods for preparing nucleosomes containing a core histone modified with a cross-linking agent, APB, and lacking the core histone tail domains.     

Nucleosome Remodeling and Epigenetics

Eukaryotic chromatin is kept flexible and dynamic to respond to environmental, metabolic, and developmental cues through the action of a family of so-called “nucleosome remodeling” ATPases. Consistent with their helicase ancestry, these enzymes experience conformation changes as they bind and hydrolyze ATP. At the same time they interact with DNA and histones, which alters histone–DNA interactions in target nucleosomes. Their action may lead to complete or partial disassembly of nucleosomes, the exchange of histones for variants, the assembly of nucleosomes, or the movement of histone octamers on DNA. “Remodeling” may render DNA sequences accessible to interacting proteins or, conversely, promote packing into tightly folded structures. Remodeling processes participate in every aspect of genome function. Remodeling activities are commonly integrated with other mechanisms such as histone modifications or RNA metabolism to assemble stable, epigenetic states.     

A Mechanism for Histone Chaperoning Activity of Nucleoplasmin: Thermodynamic and Structural Models

Nucleoplasmin (NP), a histone chaperone, acts as a reservoir for histones H2A-H2B in Xenopus laevis eggs and can displace sperm nuclear basic proteins and linker histones from the chromatin fiber of sperm and quiescent somatic nuclei. NP has been proposed to mediate the dynamic exchange of histones during the expression of certain genes and assists the assembly of nucleosomes by modulating the interaction between histones and DNA. Here, solution structural models of full-length NP and NP complexes with the functionally distinct nucleosomal core and linker histones are presented for the first time, providing a picture of the physical interactions between the nucleosomal and linker histones with NP core and tail domains. Small-angle X-ray scattering and isothermal titration calorimetry reveal that NP pentamer can accommodate five histones, either H2A-H2B dimers or H5, and that NP core and tail domains are intimately involved in the association with histones. The analysis of the binding events, employing a site-specific cooperative model, reveals a negative cooperativity-based regulatory mechanism for the linker histone/nucleosomal histone exchange. The two histone types bind with drastically different intrinsic affinity, and the strongest affinity is observed for the NP variant that mimicks the hyperphosphorylated active protein. The different “affinity windows” for H5 and H2A-H2B might allow NP to fulfill its histone chaperone role, simultaneously acting as a reservoir for the core histones and a chromatin decondensing factor. Our data are compatible with the previously proposed model where NP facilitates nucleosome assembly by removing the linker histones and depositing H2A-H2B dimers onto DNA.     

Structure and functions of linker histones

Linker histones such as variants H1, H5, and other similar proteins play an important role in regulation of chromatin structure and dynamics. However, interactions of linker histones with DNA and proteins, as well as specific functions of their different variants, are poorly studied. This is because they acquire tertiary structure only when interacting with a nucleosome, and because of limitations of currently available methods. However, deeper investigation of linker histones and their interactions with other proteins will address a number of important questions — from structure of compacted chromatin to regulation of early embryogenesis. In this review, structures of histone H1 variants and its interaction with chromatin DNA are considered. A possible functional significance of different H1 variants, a role of these proteins in maintaining interphase chromatin structure, and interactions of linker histones with other cellular proteins are also discussed.     

dBigH1, a second histone H1 in Drosophila,and the consequences for histone fold nomenclature

Recently, Pérez-Montero and colleagues (Developmental cell, 26: 578–590, 2013) described the occurrence of a new histone H1 variant (dBigH1) in Drosophila. The presence of unusual acidic amino acid patches at the N-terminal end of dBigH1 is in contrast to the arginine patches that exist at the N- and C-terminal domains of other histone H1-related proteins found in the sperm of some organisms. This departure from the strictly lysine-rich composition of the somatic histone H1 raises a question about the true definition of its protein members. Their minimal essential requirements appear to be the presence of a lysine- and alanine–rich, intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain, with a highly helicogenic potential upon binding to the linker DNA regions of chromatin. In metazoans, specific targeting of these regions is further achieved by a linker histone fold domain (LHFD), distinctively different from the characteristic core histone fold domain (CHFD) of the nucleosome core histones.     

Histone H1 and chromatin interactions in human fibroblast nuclei after H1 depletion and reconstitution with H1 subfractions.

BACKGROUND: Linker histones constitute a family of lysine-rich proteins associated with nucleosome core particles and linker DNA in eukaryotic chromatin. In permeabilized cells, they can be extracted from nuclei by using salt concentration in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 M. Although other nuclear proteins are also extracted at 0.7 M salt, the remaining nucleus represents a template that is relatively intact. METHODS: A cytochemical method was used to study the affinity of reconstituted linker histones for chromatin in situ in cultured human fibroblasts. We also investigated their ability to condense chromatin by using DNA-specific osmium ammine staining for electron microscopy. RESULTS: Permeabilized and H1-depleted fibroblast nuclei were suitable for the study of linker histone-chromatin interactions after reconstitution with purified linker histone subfractions. Our results showed that exogenous linker histones bind to chromatin with lower affinity than the native ones. We detected no significant differences between the main H1 and H1 degrees histone fractions with respect to their affinity for chromatin or in their ability to condense chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: Linker histone interactions with chromatin are controlled also by mechanisms independent of linker histone subtype composition.     

The human histone chaperone sNASP interacts with linker and core histones through distinct mechanisms

Somatic nuclear autoantigenic sperm protein (sNASP) is a human homolog of the N1/N2 family of histone chaperones. sNASP contains the domain structure characteristic of this family, which includes a large acidic patch flanked by several tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motifs. sNASP possesses a unique binding specificity in that it forms specific complexes with both histone H1 and histones H3/H4. Based on the binding affinities of sNASP variants to histones H1, H3.3, H4 and H3.3/H4 complexes, sNASP uses distinct structural domains to interact with linker and core histones. For example, one of the acidic patches of sNASP was essential for linker histone binding but not for core histone interactions. The fourth TPR of sNASP played a critical role in interactions with histone H3/H4 complexes, but did not influence histone H1 binding. Finally, analysis of cellular proteins demonstrated that sNASP existed in distinct complexes that contained either linker or core histones.     

Binding of HMG14 non-histone protein to histones H2A, H2B, H1 and DNA in reconstituted chromatin

The interaction between calf thymus HMG14 and rat liver chromatin components has been studied via reconstitution and chemical cross-linking. Selective labeling of HMG14 with photoactivable reversible heterobifunctional reagents has allowed a clear identification of the histones interacting with it (histones H2A, H2B and H1). These results are not dependent on whether the chromatin samples used were bulk chromatin, mononucleosomes, or core particles (for H2A and H2B). In addition to histone proteins, DNA also seems to be involved in HMG14 attachment to nucleosome.     

EGFP-tagged core and linker histones diffuse via distinct mechanisms within living cells

The effect of chromatin organization on EGFP-tagged histone protein dynamics within the cell nucleus has been probed using fluorescence correlation and recovery measurements on single living HeLa cells. Our studies reveal that free fraction of core-particle histones exist as multimers within the cell nucleus whereas the linker histones exist in monomeric forms. The multimeric state of core histones is found to be invariant across mammalian and polytene chromosomes and this is ATP dependent. In contrast, the dynamics of the linker histones exhibits two distinct diffusion timescales corresponding to its transient binding and unbinding to chromatin governed by the tail domain residues. Under conditions of chromatin condensation induced by apoptosis, the free multimeric fraction of core histones is found to become immobile, while the monomeric linker histone mobility is partially reduced. In addition, we observe differences in nuclear colocalization of linker and core particle histones. These results are validated through Brownian dynamics simulation of core and linker histone mobility. Our findings provide a framework to understand the coupling between the state of chromatin assembly and histone protein dynamics that is central to accessing regulatory sites on the genome.