共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
三化螟是我国水稻最大的害虫,解放后在毛主席的无产阶级革命路线指引下,在“农业学大寨”运动的推动下,各级领导依靠群众,大搞群众运动,对三化螟的防治取得显著的成绩。近年来推广应用高效低毒低残毒杀虫剂如乐果、杀螟松、杀虫脒等以及应用杀螟杆菌混合化学农药,在化学防治和生物防治方面都取得很大进展。但三化螟属于钻蛀性害虫,幼虫期在外面暴露时间短,发生面积大,每年世代数多,防治不易彻底。作为长远科研规划之一,我们从1972年开始,进行了三化螟幼虫、蛹及成虫钻。辐射不育的试验,及利用噻替派(硫代三乙烯磷胺)接触三化螟成虫引起不育的试验。一年多来试验工作已获得初步的结果,为今后在生产实践上应用不育技术消灭三化螟提供一些重要的科学根据。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
CONSTANCE HIGGINBOTTOM 《Journal of applied microbiology》1953,16(1):16-23
SUMMARY: Roll-tube colony counts, using the Astell equipment, were lower than the corresponding Petri dish counts with 27 out of 31 raw milks (87%). The difference between the counts by the two methods was greater than 25% of the plate count for 12 (39%) of the samples.
When the same dilution of milk was used for both strip-tube and plate colony counts, about equal numbers of samples gave counts from the strip tubes above and below about the colony count from plates. When, in order to obtain a more reasonable strip-tube count, the plates and strip tubes were prepared from different dilutions of the milk, the counts from the latter were, with only 3 exceptions out of 35 milks, below those from the former. The difference between the counts was greater than 25% of the plate count for 15 (43%) of the milks, a figure similar to that obtained in comparing roll-tube and plate colony counts. 相似文献
When the same dilution of milk was used for both strip-tube and plate colony counts, about equal numbers of samples gave counts from the strip tubes above and below about the colony count from plates. When, in order to obtain a more reasonable strip-tube count, the plates and strip tubes were prepared from different dilutions of the milk, the counts from the latter were, with only 3 exceptions out of 35 milks, below those from the former. The difference between the counts was greater than 25% of the plate count for 15 (43%) of the milks, a figure similar to that obtained in comparing roll-tube and plate colony counts. 相似文献
8.
9.
Alistair McEachern 《BMJ (Clinical research ed.)》1934,1(3813):190-192
10.
11.
Cedric Hilliard 《BMJ (Clinical research ed.)》1935,2(3904):838-3
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.