Are aromatase inhibitors superior to antiestrogens?

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been in use to treat metastatic breast cancer for over 25 years. Recently potent and specific AIs have been introduced, which, because of their low toxicity profile, are being used in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant situation and also for the prevention of breast cancer. The two non-steroidal AIs, anastrozole and letrozole, and the steroidal AI, exemestane, have all shown superiority to tamoxifen as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Interestingly, the oestrogen receptor downregulator, fulvestrant, was shown to be equivalent to anastrozole when compared as second-line therapy after the failure of tamoxifen. The first adjuvant AI trial began in 1996 and recruited over 9000 patients (ATAC trial). Anastrozole was compared with tamoxifen and a combination of the two drugs. There were no significant differences between tamoxifen and the combination. However, anastrozole showed about a 20% improvement in disease-free survival in ER+ disease compared with the other treatments. An overall survival analysis will be reported later this year. Two trials have compared 5 years of tamoxifen with 2–3 years of tamoxifen, followed by 2–3 years of AI (one trial (ITA) used anastrozole and another (intergroup) exemestane). Both trials show a disease-free advantage for the switch to AI. In another study (MA17) 5 years of tamoxifen was followed by a randomisation to letrozole or placebo and showed a significant disease-free advantage to the AI. Both letrozole and anastrozole show superiority to tamoxifen when used as a neoadjuvant therapy. Anastrozole significantly reduced contralateral breast cancer compared with tamoxifen, and this has led to two prevention trials: one in women at risk comparing anastrozole with placebo and the other after excision of DCIS comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen (IBIS II). The NCI Canada has also just initiated a trial of exemestane for prevention. Nearly all data available indicate that AIs are superior to tamoxifen. The important question is whether survival is improved when they are used as adjuvant therapy?     

Adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors: determining the future landscape of adjuvant endocrine therapy

This review will discuss the role of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant setting, and will summarize major strategies behind individual adjuvant trials using aromatase inhibitors. Studies with the third generation AIs including anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, have shown better outcome and improved therapeutic ratio over second line hormonal approaches (i.e. progestins or aminoglutethimide) and, more recently, over tamoxifen also. These promising results have led recently to testing of AIs in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal patients. Most trials now in progress are evaluating the role of new AIs versus tamoxifen (T) given×5 years, which in most institutions is currently the standard hormonal adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Three adjuvant approaches are being tested. First is the use of AI+T×5 years in combination versus each agent alone, as reflected in the recently completed ATAC trial. Second is a sequential approach T first×2–3 years followed by AIs×2–3 years, or the other way round; and third, T×5 years followed by AIs for additional 5 years (i.e. total duration of adjuvant hormones of 10 years). Many patients in the above trials will survive their first cancer. Hence, the non-oncological outcomes known to be affected by hormones are of rising importance. Therefore, the assessment of lipids as surrogates for cardiovascular morbidity, and of bone mineral status, as a marker for osteoporosis/bone fractures, is an important component of these trials. Also discussed in this review are proposals for future studies of AIs with focus on hormone resistance, such as early alteration of multiple hormonal agents or their intermittent use, the impact of the new generation of SERMs or ‘pure’ antiestrogens on activity of AIs, and the rising importance of AIs interacting with biologicals, cytokines or hormone modulators.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal hormone-sensitive breast cancer: to start, to switch or to extend?

From the big randomized clinical trials there are evidences that adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone-sensitive early breast cancer in postmenopausal women should include an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Anastrozole or letrozole should be used upfront for 5 years (ATAC and BIG 1-98), the sequential approach of tamoxifen for 2-3 years, followed by anastrozole or exemestane for 2-3 years is a reasonable alternative (ABCSG8, ARNO 95, IES, ITA), and mostly in patients with node-positive disease completing 5 years of tamoxifen should be offered letrozole up to 4-5 years (MA-17). In each of these trials incorporation of an AI resulted in significant improvement in study endpoints. Further results will be needed to establish the optimal beneficial effect, use, duration and safety of adjuvant AI therapies.     

Current medical treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Approximately 80% of breast cancers(BC) are estrogen receptor(ER)-positive and thus endocrine therapy(ET) should be considered complementary to surgery in the majority of patients. The advantages of oophorectomy, adrenalectomy and hypophysectomy in women with advanced BC have been demonstrated many years ago, and currently ET consist of(1) ovarian function suppression(OFS), usually obtained using gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonists(Gn RHa);(2) selective estrogen receptor modulators or down-regulators(SERMs or SERDs); and(3) aromatase inhibitors(AIs), or a combination of two or more drugs. For patients aged less than 50 years and ER+ BC, there is no conclusive evidence that the combination of OFS and SERMs(i.e., tamoxifen) or chemotherapy is superior to OFS alone. Tamoxifen users exhibit a reduced risk of BC, both invasive and in situ, especially during the first 5 years of therapy, and extending the treatment to 10 years further reduced the risk of recurrences. SERDs(i.e., fulvestrant) are especially useful in the neoadjuvant treatment of advanced BC, alone or in combination with either cytotoxic agents or AIs. There are two types of AIs: type Ⅰ are permanent steroidal inhibitors of aromatase, while type Ⅱ are reversible nonsteroidal inhibitors. Several studies demonstrated the superiority of the third-generation AIs(i.e., anastrozole and letrozole) compared with tamoxifen, and adjuvant therapy with AIs reduces the recurrence risk especially in patients with advanced BC. Unfortunately, some cancers are or became ET-resistant, and thus other drugs have been suggested in combination with SERMs or AIs, including cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors(palbociclib) and mammalian target of rapamycin(m TOR) inhibitors, such as everolimus. Further studies are required to confirm their real usefulness.     

Aromatase inhibitors for therapy of advanced breast cancer

In postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, numerous phase III trials have been performed comparing the third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NS-AIs) anastrozole and letrozole and the steroidal AI (S-AI) exemestane in the “first-line” setting against tamoxifen and in the “second-line” setting against megestrol acetate. In both settings, the AIs were at least as efficacious or superior in some endpoints with a preferable toxicity profile including a lower incidence of thrombotic events. Relatively small differences in potency between the three AIs have been identified and it has not been demonstrated that these differences have clinical implications. The recent establishment of the value of AIs in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal women will impact on their utilization in advanced disease. In premenopausal women the third-generation AIs have not been studied as monotherapy and there is a paucity of data in combination with ovarian function suppression in the advanced disease setting. The main area of future investigations for the AIs in premenopausal women will be in the adjuvant therapy setting in combination with suppression of ovarian function.     

Summary of aromatase inhibitor trials: the past and future

Antagonizing estrogen by inhibition of aromatase has become a mainstay of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Recent trials have shown an incremental gain for the AIs over tamoxifen when given as an up-front alternative to tamoxifen, but additionally added benefit is achieved by giving them in sequence with tamoxifen after either an early switch (2–3 years) or as a late switch (5 years). The true clinical implications of accelerated bone resorption from AIs is becoming better understood and its management defined. AI minimally effect quality of life. The chronic relapsing nature of ER+ breast cancer implies long term therapy will be of benefit in selected patients. Outstanding issues under investigation include optimal duration of endocrine therapy, optimal sequence, optimal agents and whether combining anti-estrogens will yield advantage. The role of AIs is also under investigation in premenopausal women in combination with ovarian function suppression. Identifying prognostic and predictive factors of endocrine therapy is important as is the identification and overcoming of resistance mechanisms. Both tumor and host signatures are being pursued to this end. Optimizing, expanding and extending endocrine therapy is likely to add further to patient outcome.     

Benefit with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal women with breast cancer

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, have been shown to be effective both as alternatives to tamoxifen in first-line treatment of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women and following failure of first-line tamoxifen for endocrine therapy. These 3 agents are now being investigated as adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer, as alternative or complementary treatments to the standard, tamoxifen. Three treatment strategies are under investigation: replacement of tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for 5 years (early adjuvant therapy), sequencing of tamoxifen before or after an aromatase inhibitor during the first 5 years (early sequential adjuvant therapy), or following 5 years of tamoxifen (extended adjuvant therapy). In the first adjuvant trial (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination [ATAC]), anastrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in reducing risk of disease recurrence, and recently, the Breast International Group (BIG) trial BIG 1-98 demonstrated the significant superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in improving disease-free survival. A large trial (International Collaborative Cancer Group [ICCG] trial 96) investigated sequencing of 2 to 3 years of exemestane after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen and found that switching to exemestane was significantly superior in disease-free survival compared with continuing on tamoxifen. The Arimidex or Nolvadex (ARNO) and the small ITA (Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex) trials similarly sequenced anastrozole after tamoxifen and also found that sequencing reduced the hazard of recurrence compared with remaining on tamoxifen. Trial MA.17 evaluated extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole vs placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen. Disease-free survival was significantly improved with letrozole vs placebo, irrespective of whether patients had lymph node-positive or node-negative tumors. All 3 aromatase inhibitors were generally well tolerated. Results of these trials indicate that aromatase inhibitors provide important benefits relative to tamoxifen in each of these adjuvant treatment settings, but the optimal approach still needs to be defined. Other trials continue to investigate some of these adjuvant treatment strategies.     

Clinical use of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

The aim of endocrine therapy is to reduce the estrogenic stimulus for tumour growth. After failure of tamoxifen — the standard “first-line” hormonotherapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC) — the most frequently prescribed endocrine therapies are progestins and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (“second-line” hormonotherapy). Estrogen deprivation through AIs provides effective treatment of hormone-dependent ABC in postmenopausal (PMP) women. Over the past few years, the goals of our research programme were to develop more potent, more selective and better tolerated AIs than our first AI, aminoglutethimide (AG). Lentaron® (4-hydroxyandrostenedione, formestane), a highly selective steroidal compound was the first of the new AIs to be used in clinical trials. It is a substrate analogue, administered as an i.m. injection every 2 weeks. It is effective in the treatment of ABC with an objective response rate (ORR) similar to tamoxifen and megestrol acetate (MA) and is generally well tolerated; rare instances of injection site reactions have been reported. Afema® (fadrozole HCl), a non-steroidal AI is active orally, and effectively suppresses estrogen levels in PMP women, but it is not completely selective for aromatase when administered at higher than therapeutic doses. At the therapeutic dose of 1 mg twice a day it has an anti-tumour efficacy similar to MA, a good tolerability and no clinically relevant effects on other hormones of the endocrine system. Letrozole is the fourth of our AIs in clinical development. It is a non-steroidal, achiral, orally active, potent and highly selective competitive AI. Clinical endocrine studies have shown that the dose of 0.5 mg a day is the lowest dose achieving maximum estrogen suppression. Over a wide dose range, a lack of clinically relevant effects on other hormones of the endocrine system has confirmed its high selectivity. In four phase Ib/IIa studies in PMP patients with ABC who failed previous therapy, letrozole produced ORRs of 9, 31, 33 and 36%. One phase IIb/III study has been completed and two others are ongoing, comparing two doses of letrozole with MA or AG to confirm the anti-tumour efficacy of letrozole in the treatment of ABC in PMP women after treatment with anti-estrogens. Preliminary results from the completed trial show that letrozole 2.5 mg is superior to 0.5 mg in terms of ORR, time to progression and time to treatment failure, and is superior to the standard dose of MA in terms of ORR and tolerability. Therefore letrozole 2.5 mg can be recommended as a first choice for the treatment of PMP patients with hormone receptor-positive or unknown ABC after anti-estrogen therapy.     

Sequential adjuvant hormone therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: rationale and clinical results

For the past 15 years tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant hormone therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, irrespective of nodal status and other clinicopathological parameters. Recent studies provided evidence that the optimal duration of tamoxifen treatment is 5 years. Based on the positive clinical results obtained with the administration of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the metastatic setting, several controlled clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and side effects of AIs versus standard tamoxifen also as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The results of the above studies, suggest a therapeutic advantage of AIs over tamoxifen with regard to relapse-free survival and the risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer. We review the rationale and the available clinical data on initial or sequential hormone treatment with AIs and we propose a novel scenario for possible therapeutic strategies based on the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients and on the biology of each single tumor.     

Women Commencing Anastrozole,Letrozole or Tamoxifen for Early Breast Cancer: The Impact of Comorbidity and Demographics on Initial Choice

Background

Australian clinical guidelines recommend endocrine therapy for all women with hormone-dependent early breast cancer. Guidelines specify tamoxifen as first-line therapy for pre-menopausal women, and tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for post-menopausal women depending on the risk of recurrence based on tumour characteristics including size. Therapies have different side effect profiles; therefore comorbidity may also influence choice. We examined comorbidity, and the clinical and demographic characteristics of women commencing different therapies.

Patients and Methods

We identified the first dispensing of tamoxifen, anastrozole or letrozole for women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the 45 and Up Study from 2004–2009 (N = 1266). Unit-level pharmacy and medical service claims, hospital, Cancer Registry, and self-reported data were linked to determine menopause status at diagnosis, tumour size, age, comorbidities, and change in subsidy restrictions. Chi-square tests and generalised regression models were used to compare the characteristics of women commencing different therapies.

Results

Most pre-menopausal women commenced therapy with tamoxifen (91%). Anastrozole was the predominant therapy for post-menopausal women (57%), followed by tamoxifen (28%). Women with osteoporosis were less likely to commence anastrozole compared with tamoxifen (anastrozole RR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.5–0.9). Women with arthritis were 1.6-times more likely to commence letrozole than anastrozole (95% CI = 1.1–2.1). Tamoxifen was more often initiated in women with tumours >1 cm, who were also ≥75 years. Subsidy restriction changes were associated with substantial increases in the proportion of women commencing AIs (anastrozole RR = 4.3, letrozole RR = 8.3).

Conclusions

The findings indicate interplay of comorbidity and therapy choice for women with invasive breast cancer. Most post-menopausal women commenced therapy with anastrozole; however, letrozole and tamoxifen were more often initiated for women with comorbid arthritis and osteoporosis, respectively. Tamoxifen was also more common for women with tumours >1 cm and aged ≥75 years. Subsidy restrictions appear to have strongly influenced therapy choice.     

New experimental models for aromatase inhibitor resistance

Clinical trials have demonstrated the importance of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in the effective treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancers. In contrast to tamoxifen, an antagonist of the estrogen receptor (ER), AIs have shown to be better tolerated along with decreased recurrence rates of the disease. Currently, three third-generation AIs are being used: exemestane, letrozole, and anastrozole. Our laboratory is attempting to understand several aspects of AI functionality. In this paper, we first review recent findings from our structure–function studies of aromatase as well as the molecular characterization of the interaction between AIs and aromatase. Based on these studies, we propose new evidence for the interaction of letrozole and exemestane with aromatase. In addition, we will discuss recent results generated from our AI-resistant cell lines. Our laboratory has generated MCF-7aro cells that are resistant to letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane, and tamoxifen. Basic functional characterization of aromatase and ER in these resistant cell lines has been done and microarray analysis has been employed in order to better understand the mechanism responsible for AI resistance on a genome-wide scale. The results generated so far suggest the presence of at least four types of resistant cell lines. Overall, the information presented in this paper supplements our understanding of AI function, and such information can be valuable for the development of treatment strategies against AI resistant breast cancers.     

Where do selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) now fit into breast cancer treatment algorithms?

The agents used for endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer have changed markedly over the past decade. Tamoxifen remains the anti-oestrogen of choice, but could be replaced by the oestrogen receptor down-regulator ICI 182780 or by the fixed ring triphenylethylene arzoxifene (previously SERM III) soon. Whilst aminoglutethimide and 4-OH androstenedione were the aromatase inhibitors of choice, they have been replaced by non-steroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) inhibitors of high potency and low side effect profile. Previously, often used treatments such as progestogens (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate) and androgens are now rarely used or confined to fourth or fifth line treatments. The LHRH agonist, goserelin, remains the treatment of choice for pre-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer although recent randomised trials indicate a response, time to progression and survival advantage for the combination of goserelin and tamoxifen compared with goserelin alone.

The newer treatments have led to questions concerning the optimum sequence of agents to use in advanced breast cancer and as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery. Two trials of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen and one trial of letrozole compared with tamoxifen indicate that the new triazole aromatase inhibitors have a significant advantage over the anti-oestrogen with respect to time to progression and survival. Similarly, triazole aromatase inhibitors give faster and more complete responses compared with tamoxifen when used in post-menopausal women before surgery.

Major research questions remain with respect to the aromatase inhibitors used as adjuvant therapy. Anastrozole is being tested alone or in combination with tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen in the ‘so-called’ ATAC trial. Over 9000 patients have been randomised to this important study: the results will be available late-2001. A similar study comparing letrozole and tamoxifen started recently under the auspices of the Breast International Group. Importantly, this trial is also comparing the sequence of tamoxifen followed by letrozole (or vice versa). A similar trial of exemestane given after 2–3 years of tamoxifen compared with 5 years of tamoxifen is recruiting well as is a study comparing letrozole (or placebo) for 5 years after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. These studies may show that aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen or that a sequence is preferable.

ICI 182780 causes complete oestrogen receptor down-regulation leading to a the lack of agonist activity of the drug. Two trials of ICI 182780 compared with anastrozole for advanced disease will report later this year and a comparison with tamoxifen next year. Arzoxifene (SERM III) is being tested against tamoxifen. These studies are likely to result in new anti-oestrogens being introduced into the clinic.

Most of our endocrine treatments deprived the tumour cell of oestradiol. In vitro experiments with MCF-7 cells indicate that tumour cells can adapt and then grow in response to low oestrogen concentrations in the tissue—culture medium. Importantly, the cells were shown to apoptose in response to high oestrogen concentrations. A recent clinical trial has demonstrated a high response rate to stilboestrol given after a median of four previous oestrogen depriving endocrine therapies. These data and the newer treatments available indicate a need to re-think our general approach to endocrine therapy and endocrine prevention.     

Endocrine approaches for the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Preventing clinical progression is the major treatment goal for both early and advanced breast cancer. For hormone-responsive cases (about 70% of the total), this can necessitate the use of sequential hormone therapies at various points during the patient's life. Newer hormonal therapies, such as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, are now competing with tamoxifen as first choice endocrine therapy in breast cancer. In addition, a further non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole has been shown to be beneficial when given at completion of 5 years adjuvant tamoxifen. In light of these new data, current treatment paradigms need to be reviewed. Already well established as second-line treatments for advanced breast cancer, the improved risk:benefit profiles of anastrozole and letrozole compared with tamoxifen mean that these agents are now also recognised alternative treatments in the first-line relapse setting. More recent studies demonstrate that anastrozole may also have an improved risk:benefit profile compared with tamoxifen when used as initial adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer. Anastrozole is also being evaluated as a preventative treatment in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. A new addition to the endocrine treatment armamentarium is the oestrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant, which, unlike tamoxifen, has no agonist effects. Fulvestrant is at least as effective as anastrozole in the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer, and provides similar benefits to tamoxifen when used as first-line therapy in patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive tumours.     

The citrus flavonone hesperetin prevents letrozole-induced bone loss in a mouse model of breast cancer

Aromatase is a key enzyme in estrogen synthesis, and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been developed for treating estrogen-responsive breast cancer. Because of its nondiscriminatory inhibition of estrogen synthesis, patients treated with AIs also contract diseases typically associated with estrogen deficiency, such as bone deterioration. Our laboratory found that the citrus flavonone hesperetin could inhibit aromatase, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator nature of flavonoid might counteract the undesirable effect of AIs. In the present study, we employed an established postmenopausal model for breast carcinogenesis to examine the drug interaction between hesperetin and letrozole, one of the AIs. Athymic mice were ovariectomized and transplanted with aromatase-overexpressing MCF-7 cells (MCF-7aro). Hesperetin was administered in the diet at 5000 ppm, and letrozole was injected sc at different doses. Results showed that either hesperetin or letrozole could reduce plasma estrogen level and inhibit tumor growth. Most importantly, the letrozole-induced bone loss measured as bone volume fraction was reversed by hesperetin without compromising on the deterrence of MCF-7aro tumor growth. Taken together, the present study suggested that hesperetin could be a potential cotherapeutic agent to AI.     

Letrozole versus tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and as neoadjuvant therapy

Letrozole, a third generation aromatase inhibitor, has been compared with tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and as neoadjuvant therapy. In a first-line trial in advanced disease, 939 post menopausal women were randomised double blind to receive treatment with letrozole 2.5 mg daily or tamoxifen 20 mg daily. Letrozole was significantly superior in terms of median time to progression (9.4 months versus 6.1 months, P = 0.0001), objective response (30% versus 20%, P = 0.0006), and clinical benefit (49% versus 38%, P = 0.0001). Superiority of letrozole was independent of disease site, receptor status, or prior adjuvant anti-oestrogen therapy. In an extended phase of this trial, 200 patients were crossed over to tamoxifen after letrozole, compared with 197 crossed over to letrozole after tamoxifen. Median overall survival was 34 months for letrozole versus 30 months for tamoxifen (not significant).

In a similar randomised double-blind neoadjuvant trial, 337 post menopausal patients with large ER/or PgR positive T2–T4 cancers, either requiring mastectomy or locally advanced, were randomised to preoperative letrozole or tamoxifen for 4 months prior to surgery. Overall response was 55% for letrozole versus 36% for tamoxifen (P < 0.001). Conservative surgery was possible in 45% of patients treated with letrozole versus 35% with tamoxifen (P = 0.022).

In both trials, both treatments were well tolerated with no significant differences in side effects.

These results indicate that letrozole is more active than tamoxifen both as neoadjuvant therapy and as first-line treatment in advanced disease. They support the importance of current adjuvant trials comparing the two treatments.     

Aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, and breast cancer

Estrogens are known to be important in the growth of breast cancers in both pre and postmenopausal women. As the number of breast cancer patients increases with age, the majority of breast cancer patients are postmenopausal women. Although estrogens are no longer made in the ovaries after menopause, peripheral tissues produce sufficient concentrations to stimulate tumor growth. As aromatase catalyzes the final and rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of estrogen, inhibitors of this enzyme are effective targeted therapy for breast cancer. Three aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now FDA approved and have been shown to be more effective than the antiestrogen tamoxifen and are well tolerated. AIs are now a standard treatment for postmenopausal patients. AIs are effective in adjuvant and first-line metastatic setting. This review describes the development of AIs and their current use in breast cancer. Recent research focuses on elucidating mechanisms of acquired resistance that may develop in some patients with long term AI treatment and also in innate resistance. Preclinical data in resistance models demonstrated that the crosstalk between ER and other signaling pathways particularly MAPK and PI3K/Akt is an important resistant mechanism. Blockade of these other signaling pathways is an attractive strategy to circumvent the resistance to AI therapy in breast cancer. Several clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the role of these novel targeted therapies to reverse resistance to AIs. Article from the special issue on 'Targeted Inhibitors'.     

Aromatase resistance mechanisms in model systems in vivo

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have now been shown to be more effective than the anti-estrogen (AE) tamoxifen and have few side effects in ER+ breast cancer patients. However, some patients may not respond and resistance to treatment may develop in others. To investigate the mechanisms involved in the loss of sensitivity of the tumors to AIs, we have studied athymic mice with tumors grown from human estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer cells (MCF-7) stably transfected with aromatase (MCF-7Ca). Treatment with letrozole upregulated Her-2 after four weeks despite continued responsiveness of tumor growth to letrozole. Furthermore, the level of Her-2 protein in letrozole refractory tumors was found to be six fold higher than the control tumors. Cells isolated from these tumors also had increased levels of Her-2 along with lower expression of ERα and aromatase and apparent estradiol independent growth. When Her-2 was inhibited by trastuzumab (antibody against Her-2) ERα levels in the cells were restored indicating that Her-2 is a negative regulator of ERα. This interaction between Her-2 and ER suggests that inhibition of both the Her-2 and estrogen signaling pathways is required to prolong the responsiveness of the tumors to endocrine therapies. Thus, when treatment with trastuzumab and letrozole was combined, ER was restored and tumor growth markedly inhibited compared to treatment with either drug alone. These findings demonstrate that tumor cells under the stress of treatment can adapt and utilize alternate pathways. Thus, when letrozole treatment was stopped, tumor Her-2 levels declined and ER levels were restored to those of hormone sensitive tumors. A second course of letrozole treatment inhibited tumors growth to the same extent and for as long as the initial treatment. These and other strategies to restore aromatase and ERα resulting in sensitivity to hormone therapy could be of substantial benefit to patients who have acquired resistance to AIs.     

Molecular endocrinology and breast cancer--a reed before the wind lives on (a tribute to Professor Mike Reed)

Oestrogens in breast cancers are derived from both uptake from the circulation and in situ synthesis. Third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) effectively block aromatase activity within the breast. The effects of AIs on the molecular biology of breast cancers may be monitored in patients given neoadjuvant therapy. Changes in tumour gene expression associated with AIs is influenced by time of drug exposure and gene expression profiles may provide important information on tumour response/ resistance to AIs.     

Comparative clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetic interactions of aromatase inhibitors

The clinical development of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has been closely guided by clinical pharmacological investigations. During the early phases of development studies were focused on dose-related pharmacological effectiveness and specificity. More recently attention has been given to the metabolic changes which AIs elicit, with particular regard to their potential use in early breast cancer and the prophylactic setting. Pharmacological effectiveness has been studied with plasma oestrogen assays but primary oestrogens (E1 and E2) are not helpful in comparing the third generation inhibitors: anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane. All three of these compounds suppress whole body aromatisation by >96%. Most recently, we have established that significantly greater inhibition is achieved by letrozole than anastrozole at their clinically used dosages. This more complete inhibition is paralleled by significantly greater suppression of E1S.

A broad panel of endocrine investigations has indicated that these compounds have essentially complete specificity at their clinical dosages. A minor androgenic effect of exemestane is revealed by a significant suppression of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Lipid and bone biomarker data are being collected in many current studies. A pharmacokinetic interaction has been established between letrozole and tamoxifen, whereby reduced circulating levels of letrozole are found with combined application. Neither anastrozole nor letrozole have any effect on plasma concentrations of tamoxifen when given in combination with it.     

Neoadjuvant tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors: comparisons and clinical outcomes

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for oestrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive large operable or locally advanced breast cancer is effective and a safe alternative to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women. A randomised trial has demonstrated that the response rate and the incidence and degree of downstaging with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole is significantly greater than with tamoxifen [J. Clin. Oncol. 19 (2001) 3808]. Tumours at all levels of ER appear to respond better to letrozole than tamoxifen but at low levels of ER responses are seen only with letrozole and not with tamoxifen. Patients most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy and those who achieve the greatest reduction in tumour volume are those patients with tumours that express very high levels of ER (ALLRED category score 8). Both letrozole and anastrozole appear effective in both erbB2 positive and negative breast cancers. Three months of treatment is adequate to determine if a tumour will respond. Following breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy, local recurrence rates appear satisfactory.