Interferon Induction by Viruses

Interferons are proteins of cellular origin capable of conferring virus resistance to vertebrate cells. Most cells do not produce interferons except in response to proper stimulation. Clearly, the stimulation of interferon production encompasses two phenomena. When stimulated, some cell systems produce their interferons by synthesizing new proteins. Other cell systems do not require the synthesis of new proteins to produce interferons, and still other cell systems may produce interferons by both means. Before much can be learned from the detailed study of the nature of the molecules which stimulate interferons, the type of phenomenon which the stimulus induces must be identified. Chick embryo tissues apparently make interferons by synthesizing new proteins. Many viruses stimulate interferon production in chick embryo tissues. Data available suggest that neither the protein nor nucleic acid moieties of the added virions act as inducing molecules. Also, double-stranded replicative form is probably not responsible. It is suggested that the inducer molecule may be cellular in nature and may be produced in response to a wide variety of insults among which are viral infections.     

Changes in Components,Glycyrrhizin and Glycyrrhetinic Acid,in Raw Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch,Modify Insulin Sensitizing and Insulinotropic Actions

We hypothesized that roasted Glycyrrhizae Radix (Glycyrrhizin Radix Praeparata, GRP) might modify anti-diabetic action due to compositional changes. Then we examined the anti-diabetic effect and mechanism of raw Glycyrrhizae Radix (GR) and GRP extracts and their major respective components, glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetinic acid. In partial pancreatectomized (Px) diabetic mice, both GR and GRP improved glucose tolerance, but only GRP enhanced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion as much as exendin-4. Both GR and GRP extracts enhanced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake through peroxisome proliferation-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Consistently with the results of the mice study, only GRP and glycyrrhetinic acid enhanced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in isolated islets. In addition, they induced mRNA levels of insulin receptor substrate-2, pancreas duodenum homeobox-1, and glucokinase in the islets, which contributed to improving β-cell viability. In conclusion, GRP extract containing glycyrrhetinic acid improved glucose tolerance better than GR extract by enhancing insulinotropic action. Thus, GRP had better anti-diabetic action than GR.     

Control of Interferon Synthesis: Effect of Diethyl-aminoethyl-Dextran on Induction by Polyinosinic-Polycytidylic Acid

Interferon production in cultures of rabbit kidney cells (RKC) stimulated with 10 to 250 mug of polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I.poly C) per ml peaked at 3 to 4 hr after the exposure of cells to inducer and rapidly declined thereafter. On the other hand, RKC stimulated with poly I.poly C (10 or 2 mug/ml) in the presence of diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-dextran (100 or 20 mug/ml, respectively) produced a protracted interferon response, with the release of interferon continuing for over 24 hr. The kinetics of interferon production in RKC stimulated with lower concentrations of the mixture of poly I.poly C and DEAE-dextran were similar to the response produced by poly I.poly C alone (10 to 250 mug/ml). Only the responses that terminated early were paradoxically enhanced by treatment with low doses of actinomycin D or with cycloheximide. Cells stimulated with 50 mug of poly I.poly C/ml showed hyporesponsiveness to a second interferon induction with poly I.poly C when restimulated 7 hr after primary induction. This hyporesponsiveness could be overcome by restimulating with higher concentrations of the poly I.poly C-DEAE-dextran complex. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that the early termination of interferon production and hyporesponsiveness to repeated induction with poly I.poly C are due to a cellular repressor exerting negative control on interferon synthesis, and that the increased cellular uptake of poly I.poly C in the presence of DEAE-dextran may effectively neutralize the repressor. These results also suggested that the often observed different kinetics and the varied effects of inhibitors of ribonucleic acid or protein synthesis on interferon responses in various cells and in cells stimulated with different inducers (such as with viruses as compared with polynucleotides) need not imply the existence of fundamentally different mechanisms of interferon production.     

Chemical Carcinogenesis in Mice inhibited by Interferon

SEVERAL experiments have demonstrated that the anti-viral substance, interferon, can inhibit the growth of spontaneous^1,2, transplanted³ and virus-induced neoplasms in mice^4–7. Lieberman et al.⁵ reported that interferon treatment partially suppressed X-radiation-induced leukaemia in C57B1/6 mice. As they pointed out, the inhibitory effect provided additional evidence for the theory that X-rays cause lymphoma through the activation of a leukaemogenic type C RNA viral intermediate. In this communication, we report studies with CF-1 mice (Carworth Farms, New York City) to determine the effects of interferon on SC tumour induction by 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC). These mice were previously shown to harbour high levels of type C RNA gs antigen and.infectious virus in normal spleens and in induced tumours, while spontaneous tumours rarely develop until late in life^8–10.     

Molecular Aspects of Interferon Induction by Viruses

Virus-induced interferon formation depends on the presence within the cell of a viral ribonucleic acid. This RNA may either be double stranded or, in certain cases, single stranded. The double-stranded RNA can be derived from a virus, such as reovirus, which contains this type of RNA, or it may be synthesized within the cell using viral single-stranded RNA as a template. Single-stranded RNA must possess a stable configuration in solution to be active, and certain viral RNA molecules appear to be active for this reason. The presence of this RNA triggers a derepression event, which is probably nuclear, by an unknown mechanism, and this is followed by the production of an interferon messenger RNA and its translation. Little is known of the derepression event or the events that follow it.     

Effect of Interferon, Polyacrylic Acid, and Polymethacrylic Acid on Tail Lesions in Mice Infected with Vaccinia Virus

Intravenous inoculation of mice with vaccinia virus produced characteristic lesions of the tail surface which were suppressed by intraperitoneal administration of interferon and polyacrylic acid (PAA). Polymethacrylic acid (PMAA) stimulated the formation of vaccinia virus lesions. For full activity, both interferon and PAA must be given prior to infection. PAA was still significantly effective at small dose levels (3 mg/kg) and achieved protection for at least 4 weeks. Protection increased with increasing molecular weight of the polymer. The mode of action of PAA is discussed.     

甘草次酸结肠靶向微丸的研制

目的:确定甘草次酸结肠靶向微丸的制剂处方,评价其释药特性。方法:采用挤出-滚圆法制备甘草次酸素丸,利用流化床包衣技术对甘草次酸素丸进行包衣,用浆法评价微丸的体外释药性能。结果:采用微晶纤维素和甘草次酸,同时加入黏合剂羧甲基纤维素钠,经过充分搅拌混合,以30%的乙醇作为润湿剂,通过挤出-滚圆制得甘草次酸素丸。以尤特奇S100为膜控材料,加入适量柠檬酸三乙酯与滑石粉配制包衣液,对甘草次酸素丸进行包衣,制得甘草次酸包衣微丸。释放度实验表明甘草次酸素丸在其增重20%时,在0.1 mo L/L的盐酸溶液中不释放,在p H6.8的磷酸缓冲液条件下6 h内其释放率不到20%。而在p H7.4的磷酸缓冲液条件下2 h内释放率达到80%以上。结论:所制的甘草次酸素丸处方合理,制剂工艺简便,通过流化床包衣技术所制的甘草次酸包衣微丸在模拟的胃液中不释放,在小肠液中释放缓慢,在结肠液中释药良好,具有良好的结肠靶向作用。     

Induction of Interferon and Erythropoietic Differentiation in Cells Transformed by Friend Virus

Two lines of Friend virus (FV)-transformed mouse spleen cells have been analyzed in respect to their interferon production capacity: neither F4 cells, which liberate infectious FV when kept under tissue culture conditions, nor the thymidine kinase-deficient B8 cells, which do not produce significant amounts of FV, release detectable amounts of autogenous interferon into cell supernatants. However, interferon is produced in these cells in amounts comparable to that in L-929 cells when interferon induction is initiated with UV-inactivated Newcastle disease virus. Conversely poly(I) · poly(C), a potent interferon inducer in L-929 cells, proved ineffective in this capacity in F4 or B8 cells. When erythropoietic differentiation is induced in these cells by dimethyl sulfoxide, no autogenous interferon production occurs, but with NDV-induction a four- to fivefold increase of interferon production is observed. A similar elevation of interferon production is achieved during 5-bromodeoxyuridine stimulation of differentiation in the thymidine kinase-deficient B8 cells. The refractiveness against poly(I) · poly(C) displayed in unstimulated cells is not overcome at any stage of differentiation, indicating major differences of Newcastle disease virus and poly(I) · poly(C) induction mechanisms.     

Stimulation of Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylase Induction in Cell Cultures by Interferon

In cell cultures previously treated with homologous interferon, the magnitude of antiviral activity and the degree of stimulation of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction appear to be directly related. In a highly purified mouse interferon preparation, the factor stimulating hydroxylase induction and the factor directing antiviral activity are inactivated by heating to 70 C or by treating with trypsin. Also, both activities demonstrate species specificity.     

Interferon Production in Mice by Cell Wall Mutants of Salmonella typhimurium

The interferon response elicited by Salmonella typhimurium mutants in mice is not dependent on the presence of a complete cell wall lipopolysaccharide. In fact, a mutant (G30/C21) which has lost all the polysaccharide side chains and sugars of the O antigen and contains only 2-keto-3-deoxyoctonate and lipid is indistinguishable in its interferon-stimulating ability from the wild type which possesses a complete O antigen with polysaccharide side chains.