NMR structures of polytopic integral membrane proteins

Membrane proteins represent up to 30% of the proteins in all organisms, they are involved in many biological processes and are the molecular targets for around 50% of validated drugs. Despite this, membrane proteins represent less than 1% of all high-resolution protein structures due to various challenges associated with applying the main biophysical techniques used for protein structure determination. Recent years have seen an explosion in the number of high-resolution structures of membrane proteins determined by NMR spectroscopy, especially for those with multiple transmembrane-spanning segments. This is a review of the structures of polytopic integral membrane proteins determined by NMR spectroscopy up to the end of the year 2010, which includes both β-barrel and α-helical proteins from a number of different organisms and with a range in types of function. It also considers the challenges associated with performing structural studies by NMR spectroscopy on membrane proteins and how some of these have been overcome, along with its exciting potential for contributing new knowledge about the molecular mechanisms of membrane proteins, their roles in human disease, and for assisting drug design.     

NMR structures of polytopic integral membrane proteins

Abstract

Membrane proteins represent up to 30% of the proteins in all organisms, they are involved in many biological processes and are the molecular targets for around 50% of validated drugs. Despite this, membrane proteins represent less than 1% of all high-resolution protein structures due to various challenges associated with applying the main biophysical techniques used for protein structure determination. Recent years have seen an explosion in the number of high-resolution structures of membrane proteins determined by NMR spectroscopy, especially for those with multiple transmembrane-spanning segments. This is a review of the structures of polytopic integral membrane proteins determined by NMR spectroscopy up to the end of the year 2010, which includes both β-barrel and α-helical proteins from a number of different organisms and with a range in types of function. It also considers the challenges associated with performing structural studies by NMR spectroscopy on membrane proteins and how some of these have been overcome, along with its exciting potential for contributing new knowledge about the molecular mechanisms of membrane proteins, their roles in human disease, and for assisting drug design.     

Translocation of domains of nascent periplasmic proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane is independent of elongation

Accessibility of nascent chains of periplasmic proteins to externally added proteinase K was used as the criterion for translocation of polypeptides across the cytoplasmic membrane of E. coli during the process of export. It is concluded for maltose-binding protein and ribose-binding protein that nascent chains carrying the signal sequence are not accessible to the proteinase while chains that have been matured span the membrane and are degraded. Translocation of polypeptides is a late event relative to extent of elongation, occurring only after maltosebinding protein has reached molecular weight 33,000 (80% of its entire length) and after ribosebinding protein has been fully elongated (molecular weight 29,000). The data presented here are inconsistent with postulated mechanisms of export requiring a strict coupling of translocation to elongation of nascent polypeptide chains. In contrast, the data support the idea that entire domains of polypeptides are transferred after their synthesis. This is the case whether the translocation of a protein is initiated post-translationally or begins before synthesis of the entire protein is completed.     

Prediction of transmembrane helix orientation in polytopic membrane proteins

Background  

Membrane proteins compose up to 30% of coding sequences within genomes. However, their structure determination is lagging behind compared with soluble proteins due to the experimental difficulties. Therefore, it is important to develop reliable computational methods to predict structures of membrane proteins.     

Membrane translocation of lumenal domains of membrane proteins powered by downstream transmembrane sequences

Translocation of the N-terminus of a type I signal anchor (SA-I) sequence across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane can be arrested by tagging with a streptavidin-binding peptide tag (SBP tag) and trapping by streptavidin. In the present study, we first examine the affinity required for the translocation arrest. When the SBP tag is serially truncated, the ability for arrest gradually decreases. Surface plasmon resonance analysis shows that an interaction as strong as 10⁻⁸ M or a smaller dissociation constant is required for trapping the topogenesis of a natural SA-I sequence. Such truncated tags, however, become effective by mutating the SA-I sequence, suggesting that the translocation motivation is considerably influenced by the properties of the SA-I sequence. In addition, we introduce the SBP tag into lumenal loops of a multispanning membrane protein, human erythrocyte band 3. Among the tagged loops between transmembrane 1 (TM1) and TM8, three loops are trapped by cytosolic streptavidin. These loops are followed by TM sequences possessing topogenic properties, like the SA-I sequence, and translocation of one loop is diminished by insertion of a proline into the following TM sequence. These findings suggest that the translocation of lumenal loops by SA-I–like TM sequences has a crucial role in topogenesis of multispanning membrane proteins.     

N-tail translocation in a eukaryotic polytopic membrane protein: synergy between neighboring transmembrane segments.

We have used the natural N-glycosylation site in the N-tail of cig30, a eukaryotic polytopic membrane protein, as a marker for N-tail translocation across the microsomal membrane. Analysis of C-terminally truncated cig30 constructs reveals that the first transmembrane segment is sufficient for translocation of the wild-type N-tail; in contrast, in a mutant with four arginines introduced into the N-tail the second transmembrane segment is also required for efficient N-tail translocation. Our observations imply a non-sequential assembly mechanism in which the ultimate location of the N-tail relative to the membrane may depend on more than one transmembrane segment.     

Novel class of polytopic proteins with domains associated with putative protease activity

A significant proportion of early onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) is caused by mutations in human genes for amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilins 1 and 2 (PSEN1,2). AD associated mutations in PSEN1,2 genes alter the -secretase cleavage activity of APP resulting in increased production of amyloidogenic A42. PSEN dependent intramembrane proteolysis was described as an important step required for cleavage of Notch receptors, Notch-dependent signal transduction, and processing of other proteins. It is still unclear whether presenilins are unusual intramembrane proteases or they are necessary cofactors of -secretase cleavage of APP and Notch. Identification of other proteins similar to presenilins may resolve this dilemma. We describe here the identification of novel families of genes encoding polytopic transmembrane proteins of Eukaryotes (IMPASes) and Arachaea (membrases). These proteins have a predicted structure similar to presenilins. The amino acid similarity is significant in domains carrying invariant amino acid residues, which are critical in specific presenilin-regulated endoproteolysis. Many members of the IMPAS family have protease associated domains (PA) typical of proteases. We identified and cloned five human IMPAS genes. Expression analysis of the hIMP1 gene (located on chromosome 20) was performed in human cell tissues and transfected cell cultures. The data demonstrate that a conservative class of putative protease-related polytopic proteins related to presenilins exists in multicellular eukaryotes and microorganisms.     

Flexible regions within the membrane-embedded portions of polytopic membrane proteins

The conventional view of the structure of the membrane-embedded regions of integral membrane proteins is that they are in contact with lipids that interact with the hydrophobic surfaces of the polypeptide, and therefore have intrinsically rigid alpha-helical structures. Here, we briefly review the evidence that in the case of integral membrane proteins with many membrane spans (including membrane transporters and channels), some membrane peptide segments are more or less completely shielded from the lipid bilayer by other membrane polypeptide portions. These portions do not need to have alpha-helical structures and are likely to be much more flexible than typical membrane-spanning helices. The ability of the band 3 anion exchanger to accommodate anionic substrates of different sizes, geometries, and charge distributions suggests the presence of flexible regions in the active center of this protein. These flexible substructures may have important functional roles in membrane proteins, particularly in the mechanisms of membrane transporters and channels.     

Inverted repeat domains in membrane proteins

With the upsurge in known membrane protein structures, common structural themes have started to emerge. One of these is the inverted repeat, a tandem of alpha-helical domains that have similar tertiary folds but opposite membrane orientations. In all previously known examples, both repeat units were encoded in a single continuous polypeptide. Recent structures of a bacterial multidrug transporter, EmrE, revealed an inverted repeat membrane protein wherein the two repeat units are assembled from two polypeptides with the same primary sequence. Here, we speculate on some of the implications of the EmrE structure with regards to our understanding of membrane protein evolution and topogenesis.     

Helix packing in polytopic membrane proteins: role of glycine in transmembrane helix association.

The nature and distribution of amino acids in the helix interfaces of four polytopic membrane proteins (cytochrome c oxidase, bacteriorhodopsin, the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, and the potassium channel of Streptomyces lividans) are studied to address the role of glycine in transmembrane helix packing. In contrast to soluble proteins where glycine is a noted helix breaker, the backbone dihedral angles of glycine in transmembrane helices largely fall in the standard alpha-helical region of a Ramachandran plot. An analysis of helix packing reveals that glycine residues in the transmembrane region of these proteins are predominantly oriented toward helix-helix interfaces and have a high occurrence at helix crossing points. Moreover, packing voids are generally not formed at the position of glycine in folded protein structures. This suggests that transmembrane glycine residues mediate helix-helix interactions in polytopic membrane proteins in a fashion similar to that seen in oligomers of membrane proteins with single membrane-spanning helices. The picture that emerges is one where glycine residues serve as molecular notches for orienting multiple helices in a folded protein complex.     

Requirements for the membrane insertion of signal-anchor type proteins

Proteins which are inserted and anchored in the membrane of the ER by an uncleaved signal-anchor sequence can assume two final orientations. Type I signal-anchor proteins translocate the NH2 terminus across the membrane while type II signal-anchor proteins translocate the COOH terminus. We investigated the requirements for cytosolic protein components and nucleotides for the membrane targeting and insertion of single-spanning type I signal-anchor proteins. Besides the ribosome, signal recognition particle (SRP), GTP, and rough microsomes (RMs) no other components were found to be required. The GTP analogue GMPPNP could substitute for GTP in supporting the membrane insertion of IMC-CAT. By using a photocrosslinking assay we show that for secreted, type I and type II signal-anchor proteins the presence of both GTP and RMs is required for the release of the nascent chain from the 54-kD subunit of SRP. For two of the proteins studied the release of the nascent chain from SRP54 was accompanied by a new interaction with components of the ER. We conclude that the GTP-dependent release of the nascent chain from SRP54 occurs in an identical manner for each of the proteins studied.     

Acidic receptor domains on both sides of the outer membrane mediate translocation of precursor proteins into yeast mitochondria.

Mitochondrial precursor proteins made in the cytosol bind to a hetero-oligomeric protein import receptor on the mitochondrial surface and then pass through the translocation channel across the outer membrane. This translocation step is accelerated by an acidic domain of the receptor subunit Mas22p, which protrudes into the intermembrane space. This 'trans' domain of Mas22p specifically binds functional mitochondrial targeting peptides with a Kd of < 1 microM and is required to anchor the N-terminal targeting sequence of a translocation-arrested precursor in the intermembrane space. If this Mas22p domain is deleted, respiration-driven growth of the cells is compromised and import of different precursors into isolated mitochondria is inhibited 3- to 8-fold. Binding of precursors to the mitochondrial surface appears to be mediated by cytosolically exposed acidic domains of the receptor subunits Mas20p and Mas22p. Translocation of a precursor across the outer membrane thus appears to involve sequential binding of the precursor's basic and amphiphilic targeting signal to acidic receptor domains on both sides of the membrane.     

Sec-independent translocation of a 100-residue periplasmic N-terminal tail in the E. coli inner membrane protein proW.

The ProW protein, located in the inner membrane of Escherichia coli, has a very unusual topology with a 100-residue-long N-terminal tail protruding into the periplasmic space. We have studied the mechanism of membrane translocation of the periplasmic tail by analysing ProW-PhoA and ProW-Lep fusion proteins, both in wild-type cells and in cells with an impaired sec machinery. Our results show that the translocation efficiency is not affected by treatments that compromise the SecA and SecY functions, but that translocation is completely blocked by dissipation of the proton motive force or by the introduction of extra positively charged residues into the N-terminal tail. This suggests that the sec machinery can act properly only on domains located on the C-terminal side of a translocation signal, and that the N-terminal tail is driven through the membrane by a mechanism that involves the proton motive force.     

Recognition domains in assembly of oligomeric membrane proteins

Many integral membrane proteins, particularly receptors on the cell surface, are made up of several polypeptide chains. After translation and insertion into the ER membrane, these subunits must assemble into the mature protein. However, the mechanisms controlling their faithful assembly are largely unknown. Recent evidence has shed some light on two cell surface receptors that use different strategies to assemble their subunits. Zach Hall discusses oligomerization of the T-cell receptor and the acetylcholine receptor.     

Transmembrane segments of nascent polytopic membrane proteins control cytosol/ER targeting during membrane integration

During cotranslational integration of a eukaryotic multispanning polytopic membrane protein (PMP), its hydrophilic loops are alternately directed to opposite sides of the ER membrane. Exposure of fluorescently labeled nascent PMP to the cytosol or ER lumen was detected by collisional quenching of its fluorescence by iodide ions localized in the cytosol or lumen. PMP loop exposure to the cytosol or lumen was controlled by structural rearrangements in the ribosome, translocon, and associated proteins that occurred soon after a nascent chain transmembrane segment (TMS) entered the ribosomal tunnel. Each successive TMS, although varying in length, sequence, hydrophobicity, and orientation, reversed the structural changes elicited by its predecessor, irrespective of loop size. Fluorescence lifetime data revealed that TMSs occupied a more nonpolar environment than secretory proteins inside the aqueous ribosome tunnel, which suggests that TMS recognition by the ribosome involves hydrophobic interactions. Importantly, the TMS-triggered structural rearrangements that cycle nascent chain exposure between cytosolic and lumenal occur without compromising the permeability barrier of the ER membrane.     

Membrane insertion of gap junction connexins: polytopic channel forming membrane proteins

Connexins, the proteins that form gap junction channels, are polytopic plasma membrane (PM) proteins that traverse the plasma membrane bilayer four times. The insertion of five different connexins into the membrane of the ER was studied by synthesizing connexins in translation- competent cell lysates supplemented with pancreatic ER-derived microsomes, and by expressing connexins in vivo in several eucaryotic cell types. In addition, the subcellular distribution of the connexins was determined. In vitro-synthesis in the presence of microsomes resulted in the signal recognition particle-dependent membrane insertion of the connexins. The membrane insertion of all connexins was accompanied by an efficient proteolytic processing that was dependent on the microsome concentration. Endogenous unprocessed connexins were detectable in the microsomes used, indicating that the pancreatic microsomes serve as a competent recipient in vivo for unprocessed full length connexins. Although oriented with their amino terminus in the cytoplasm, the analysis of the cleavage reaction indicated that an unprecedented processing by signal peptidase resulted in the removal of an amino-terminal portion of the connexins. Variable amounts of similar connexin cleavage products were also identified in the ER membranes of connexin overexpressing cells. The amount generated correlated with the level of protein expression. These results demonstrate that the connexins contain a cryptic signal peptidase cleavage site that can be processed by this enzyme in vitro and in vivo in association with their membrane insertion. Consequently, a specific factor or condition must be required to prevent this aberrant processing of connexins under normal conditions in the cell.