Human Papillomavirus DNA Replication Compartments in a Transient DNA Replication System

Many DNA viruses replicate their genomes at nuclear foci in infected cells. Using indirect immunofluorescence in combination with fluorescence in situ hybridization, we colocalized the human papillomavirus (HPV) replicating proteins E1 and E2 and the replicating origin-containing plasmid to nuclear foci in transiently transfected cells. The host replication protein A (RP-A) was also colocalized to these foci. These nuclear structures were identified as active sites of viral DNA synthesis by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse-labeling. Unexpectedly, the great majority of RP-A and BrdU incorporation was found in these HPV replication domains. Furthermore, E1, E2, and RP-A were also colocalized to nuclear foci in the absence of an origin-containing plasmid. These observations suggest a spatial reorganization of the host DNA replication machinery upon HPV DNA replication or E1 and E2 expression. Alternatively, viral DNA replication might be targeted to host nuclear domains that are active during the late S phase, when such domains are limited in number. In a fraction of cells expressing E1 and E2, the promyelocytic leukemia protein, a component of nuclear domain 10 (ND10), was either partially or completely colocalized with E1 and E2. Since ND10 structures were recently hypothesized to be sites of bovine papillomavirus virion assembly, our observation suggests that HPV DNA amplification might be partially coupled to virion assembly.     

Homologous Recombinational Repair Factors Are Recruited and Loaded onto the Viral DNA Genome in Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Compartments

Homologous recombination is an important biological process that facilitates genome rearrangement and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The induction of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic replication induces ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)-dependent DNA damage checkpoint signaling, leading to the clustering of phosphorylated ATM and Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complexes to sites of viral genome synthesis in nuclei. Here we report that homologous recombinational repair (HRR) factors such as replication protein A (RPA), Rad51, and Rad52 as well as MRN complexes are recruited and loaded onto the newly synthesized viral genome in replication compartments. The 32-kDa subunit of RPA is extensively phosphorylated at sites in accordance with those with ATM. The hyperphosphorylation of RPA32 causes a change in RPA conformation, resulting in a switch from the catalysis of DNA replication to the participation in DNA repair. The levels of Rad51 and phosphorylated RPA were found to increase with the progression of viral productive replication, while that of Rad52 proved constant. Furthermore, biochemical fractionation revealed increases in levels of DNA-bound forms of these HRRs. Bromodeoxyuridine-labeled chromatin immunoprecipitation and PCR analyses confirmed the loading of RPA, Rad 51, Rad52, and Mre11 onto newly synthesized viral DNA, and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling analysis demonstrated DSBs in the EBV replication compartments. HRR factors might be recruited to repair DSBs on the viral genome in viral replication compartments. RNA interference knockdown of RPA32 and Rad51 prevented viral DNA synthesis remarkably, suggesting that homologous recombination and/or repair of viral DNA genome might occur, coupled with DNA replication to facilitate viral genome synthesis.Replication protein A (RPA), the eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, is a heterotrimeric complex composed of three tightly associated subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa (referred as to RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14, respectively) that is essential for DNA replication, recombination, and all major types of DNA repair (4). RPA participates in such diverse pathways through its ability to interact with DNA and numerous proteins involved in its processing. During DNA replication, RPA associates with ssDNA at forks and facilitates nascent-strand DNA synthesis by replicative DNA polymerases localized at replication foci during S phase. Under DNA-damaging conditions, RPA binds to ssDNA at damaged sites and interacts with repair and recombination components to process double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) and other lesions (6, 14, 21, 32, 38, 41).RPA undergoes both DNA damage-independent and -dependent phosphorylation on the N-terminal 33 residues of RPA32. Unstressed cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation occurs during the G₁/S-phase transition and in M phase, primarily at the conserved cyclin-CDK phosphorylation sites of Ser-23 and Ser-29 in the N terminus of the RPA32 subunit (13, 15). In contrast, stress-induced hyperphosphorylation of RPA is much more extensive. Nine potential phosphorylation sites within the N-terminal domain of RPA32, Ser-4, Ser-8, Ser-11/Ser-12/Ser-13, Thr-21, Ser-23, Ser-29, and Ser-33, in response to DNA-damaging agents, have been suggested (33, 54). Although this region of RPA32 is not required for the ssDNA-binding activity of RPA (5, 22), a phosphorylation-induced subtle conformation change in RPA, resulting from altered intersubunit interactions, regulates the interaction of RPA with both interacting proteins and DNA (30). The hyperphosphorylated form of RPA32 is unable to localize to replication centers in normal cells, while binding to DNA damage foci is unaffected (46). Therefore, RPA phosphorylation following damage is thought to both prevent RPA from catalyzing DNA replication and potentially serve as a marker to recruit repair factors to sites of DNA damage. RPA localizes to nuclear foci where DNA repair is occurring after DNA damage and is essential for multiple DNA repair pathways, participating in damage recognition, excision, and resynthesis reactions (4, 56).Mammalian cells can repair DSBs by homologous recombination (HR) or by nonhomologous end joining. HR is an accurate repair process, the first step of which is the resection of the 5′ ends of the DSB to generate 3′ ssDNA overhangs. This reaction is carried out by the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex, which not only functions as a damage sensor upstream of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)/ATM-Rad3-related (ATR) activation but also plays a role in DSB repair (4). RPA and members of the RAD52 epistasis group of gene products, such as Rad51, Rad52, and Rad54, bind to the resulting 3′ ssDNA strands and form a helical, nucleoprotein filament that facilitates the invasion of a damaged DNA strand into the homologous double-stranded DNA partner. The human Rad51 protein is a structural and functional homolog of the Escherichia coli RecA protein, which promotes homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro. Both Rad51 and Rad52 bind specifically to the terminal regions of tailed duplex DNA, the substrate thought to initiate recombination in vivo. Furthermore, nucleoprotein filaments of Rad51, formed on tailed DNA, catalyze strand invasion of homologous duplex DNA in a reaction that is stimulated by Rad52 and RPA (3).Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus that infects B lymphocytes, inducing their continuous proliferation. In B-lymphoblastoid cell lines, there is no production of virus particles, which is termed latent infection (52). Reactivation from latency is characterized by the expression of lytic genes, and one of the first detectable changes is the expression of the BZLF1 immediate-early gene product, which trans-activates viral promoters (16), leading to an ordered cascade of viral early and late gene expression. This lytic EBV DNA replication occurs in discrete sites in nuclei, called replication compartments, in which seven viral replication proteins are assembled (44). The viral genome is amplified several hundredfold by the viral replication machinery and is thought to generate highly branched replication intermediates through HR coupled with viral DNA replication (48). With the progression of lytic replication, the replication compartments become larger and appeared to fuse to form large globular structures that eventually filled the nucleus at late stages of infection (8, 45).We previously isolated latently EBV-infected Tet-BZLF1/B95-8 cells in which the exogenous BZLF1 protein is conditionally expressed under the control of a tetracycline-regulated promoter, leading to a highly efficient induction of lytic replication (28). Using this system, we have demonstrated that the induction of the EBV lytic program results in the inhibition of replication of cellular DNA in spite of the replication of viral DNA (28) and elicits a cellular DNA damage response, with the activation of the ATM-Chk2-p53 DNA damage transduction pathway (29). The DNA damage sensor MRN complex and phosphorylated ATM are recruited and retained in viral replication compartments (29).Here we report that RPA32 is extensively phosphorylated after EBV lytic replication is induced, with the phosphorylation sites in accordance with those for ATM. Phosphorylated RPA, Rad51, and Rad52, which are involved in HR repair (HRR), are recruited and retained in viral replication compartments as well as the MRN complex. Furthermore, DSBs could be demonstrated to occur during viral genome synthesis in the EBV replication compartments. HRR factors might be recruited to repair DSBs on the viral genome in viral replication compartments. RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of RPA32 and Rad51 prevented viral DNA synthesis remarkably, suggesting that HR and/or repair of viral DNA genome might occur, coupled with DNA replication, to facilitate viral genome synthesis.     

Identification of Rep-Associated Factors in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1-Induced Adeno-Associated Virus Type 2 Replication Compartments

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that replicates only in cells coinfected with a helper virus, such as adenovirus or herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). We previously showed that nine HSV-1 factors are able to support AAV rep gene expression and genome replication. To elucidate the strategy of AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1, we undertook a proteomic analysis of cellular and HSV-1 factors associated with Rep proteins and thus potentially recruited within AAV replication compartments (AAV RCs). This study resulted in the identification of approximately 60 cellular proteins, among which factors involved in DNA and RNA metabolism represented the largest functional categories. Validation analyses indicated that the cellular DNA replication enzymes RPA, RFC, and PCNA were recruited within HSV-1-induced AAV RCs. Polymerase δ was not identified but subsequently was shown to colocalize with Rep within AAV RCs even in the presence of the HSV-1 polymerase complex. In addition, we found that AAV replication is associated with the recruitment of components of the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex, Ku70 and -86, and the mismatch repair proteins MSH2, -3, and -6. Finally, several HSV-1 factors were also found to be associated with Rep, including UL12. We demonstrated for the first time that this protein plays a role during AAV replication by enhancing the resolution of AAV replicative forms and AAV particle production. Altogether, these analyses provide the basis to understand how AAV adapts its replication strategy to the nuclear environment induced by the helper virus.Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that is currently used as a gene transfer vector (14). AAV particles consist of a small icosahedral capsid protecting a single 4.7-kb single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome with two open reading frames, rep and cap, surrounded by inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). The ITRs are the only sequences required in cis for genome replication and packaging. The rep gene encodes four nonstructural Rep proteins: Rep78, -68, -52, and -40. The two larger isoforms, Rep78 and -68, have origin binding, helicase, and site-specific endonuclease activities and are involved in AAV gene expression and genome processing, including replication and site-specific integration (39). The two smaller Rep isoforms are not required for AAV DNA replication but are involved in the control of viral gene expression and packaging of viral DNA (30).When wild-type (wt) AAV infects a cell in the absence of a helper virus, it enters latency. Latent AAV genomes persist in cells either as episomes or as integrated genomes, preferentially at a specific locus (named AAVS1) on human chromosome 19. In most instances, no detectable viral gene expression or genome replication occurs unless the cell is co- or superinfected by a helper virus, such as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), or HSV-2. Under these conditions, AAV replication and assembly take place in large intranuclear domains called replication compartments (RCs) that frequently colocalize with replication domains formed by the helper virus itself (81). The viral genome replicates by leading-strand synthesis and generates new ssDNA molecules by a strand displacement mechanism that occurs after strand- and site-specific cleavage of viral DNA by Rep78/68 within the ITRs (39).Studies conducted on the relationship between AAV and its helper viruses are important not only to identify helper activities that can be used to produce recombinant AAV vectors but also to understand how AAV adapts its replication strategy to the helper virus and to the nuclear environment in general. Adenovirus helper functions have historically been the first and most extensively studied functions. These studies have shown that adenovirus helps AAV by stimulating viral gene expression and by enhancing AAV genome replication, mostly indirectly (19). Indeed, early studies showed that the adenovirus polymerase (E2b) is dispensable for AAV replication (8) and that the viral DNA-binding protein (DBP), the product of the E2a gene, is able to modestly enhance the processivity of AAV genome replication in vitro (77). More recently, the adenovirus proteins E1b55k and E4orf6 were shown to stimulate AAV genome replication by degrading the cellular Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex that restricts AAV genome replication during adenovirus coinfection (32). The concept that AAV genome replication can rely mostly, if not uniquely, on direct help from cellular factors was further strengthened by the demonstration that purified proteins such as replication protein A (RPA), replication factor C (RFC), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins, and DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) were sufficient to replicate the AAV genome in vitro in the presence of Rep (40-41, 43). The involvement of these cellular proteins during AAV genome replication was also confirmed by the proteomic analysis of factors associated with Rep proteins during adenovirus-induced AAV replication (42).Interestingly, studies conducted on HSV-1 helper activities suggest that the strategy of AAV replication may vary depending on the helper virus. Indeed, previous studies showed that the HSV-1 helicase-primase (HP) complex (UL5/8/52) and DBP (ICP8) could replicate transfected AAV-2 plasmids (80) and that the helicase activity, but not primase activity, of the HP complex was required for this effect (62, 66). More recently, a comprehensive study of HSV-1 helper activities demonstrated that the HSV-1 immediate-early proteins ICP0, ICP4, and ICP22 could stimulate rep gene expression, probably by diminishing intrinsic antiviral effects (1, 18). In addition, the HSV-1 DNA polymerase encoded by UL30, along with its associated processivity factor (UL42), although not strictly required, was demonstrated to significantly increase AAV replication levels induced in the presence of the HP complex and ICP8. Interestingly, the HSV-1 HP complex, DBP, and polymerase were also shown to be sufficient to replicate AAV DNA in vitro in the presence of Rep proteins without any cellular protein (78). Altogether, these observations indicate that in the context of an HSV-1 coinfection, AAV relies extensively on viral activities provided by the helper that directly participate in AAV genome replication.To further elucidate the strategy of AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1, we undertook a proteomic analysis to identify the cellular and HSV-1 factors associated with Rep proteins and, consequently, potentially recruited within AAV RCs. To analyze Rep-associated proteins in the presence and absence of HSV-1 DNA replication, this analysis was performed using wt HSV-1 and an HSV-1 mutant in which the DNA polymerase encoded by the UL30 gene is absent (HSVΔUL30). This study resulted in the identification of approximately 60 cellular proteins, among which the largest functional categories corresponded to factors involved in DNA and RNA metabolism. Immunofluorescence analyses confirmed that in the presence of HSV-1, a basal set of cellular DNA replication enzymes, including RPA, RFC, and PCNA, was recruited within AAV RCs, with the exception of the MCM helicases. The cellular DNA polymerases, in particular Pol δ, were not identified by this analysis but subsequently were shown to be recruited in AAV RCs even in the presence of the HSV-1 polymerase complex. In addition, our results indicate that AAV replication induced by HSV-1 is associated with the recruitment of DNA repair factors, including components of the MRN complex, the Ku proteins, PARP-1, and factors of the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. Finally, several HSV-1 proteins, most notably the UL12 protein, were also identified within AAV RCs. Our analyses confirmed the association between UL12 and Rep and demonstrated for the first time that this viral exonuclease plays a critical role during AAV replication by enhancing the formation of discrete AAV replicative forms and the production of AAV particles.Altogether, these results indicate that in the presence of HSV-1, AAV may replicate by using a basal set of cellular DNA replication enzymes but also relies extensively on HSV-1-derived proteins for its replication, including UL12, a newly discovered helper factor. These results suggest that AAV may be able to differentially adapt its replication strategy to the nuclear environment induced by the helper virus.     

蛋白质起始的DNA病毒复制机制

DNA聚合酶在DNA合成过程中需要的引物包括RNA引物、DNA自我引物和蛋白质引物3种类型。新DNA链(如冈崎片段)的复制多是在DNA模板上合成一段RNA引物,细小病毒利用其基因组末端的反向末端重复序列(ITRs)自我折叠成DNA引物,而一些DNA、RNA病毒及真菌质粒起始复制反应的引物则是蛋白质。以感染原核生物的噬菌体Phi29和真核DNA病毒腺病毒为例,从复制过程所涉及的蛋白质、对复制原点的识别、复制起始反应、新链的延伸、复制终止过程等方面详细阐述DNA病毒由蛋白质引发的复制机制,并对已商品化的Phi29 DNA聚合酶产品多重置换扩增及单细胞测序等的应用以及基于噬菌体Phi29蛋白质起始的最小复制系统体外扩增异源DNA等最新的应用研究作相关总结介绍。     

Low-Resolution Structure of Vaccinia Virus DNA Replication Machinery

Smallpox caused by the poxvirus variola virus is a highly lethal disease that marked human history and was eradicated in 1979 thanks to a worldwide mass vaccination campaign. This virus remains a significant threat for public health due to its potential use as a bioterrorism agent and requires further development of antiviral drugs. The viral genome replication machinery appears to be an ideal target, although very little is known about its structure. Vaccinia virus is the prototypic virus of the Orthopoxvirus genus and shares more than 97% amino acid sequence identity with variola virus. Here we studied four essential viral proteins of the replication machinery: the DNA polymerase E9, the processivity factor A20, the uracil-DNA glycosylase D4, and the helicase-primase D5. We present the recombinant expression and biochemical and biophysical characterizations of these proteins and the complexes they form. We show that the A20D4 polymerase cofactor binds to E9 with high affinity, leading to the formation of the A20D4E9 holoenzyme. Small-angle X-ray scattering yielded envelopes for E9, A20D4, and A20D4E9. They showed the elongated shape of the A20D4 cofactor, leading to a 150-Å separation between the polymerase active site of E9 and the DNA-binding site of D4. Electron microscopy showed a 6-fold rotational symmetry of the helicase-primase D5, as observed for other SF3 helicases. These results favor a rolling-circle mechanism of vaccinia virus genome replication similar to the one suggested for tailed bacteriophages.     

Simian Virus 40 DNA Replication in Isolated Replicating Viral Chromosomes

Three subnuclear systems capable of continuing many aspects of simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication were characterized in an effort to define the minimum requirements for "normal" DNA replication in vitro. Nuclear extracts, prepared by incubating nuclei isolated from SV40-infected CV-1 cells in a hypotonic buffer to release both SV40 replicating and mature chromosomes, were either centrifuged to separate the total SV40 nucleoprotein complexes from the soluble nucleosol or fractionated on sucrose gradients to provide purified SV40 replicating chromosomes. With nuclear extracts, CV-1 cell cytosol stimulated total DNA synthesis, elongation of nascent DNA chains, maturation and joining of "Okazaki pieces," and the conversion of replicating viral DNA into covalently closed, superhelical DNA. Nucleoprotein complexes responded similarly, but frequently the response was reduced by 10 to 30%. In contrast, isolated replicating chromosomes in the presence of cytosol appeared only to complete and join Okazaki pieces already present on the template; without cytosol, Okazaki pieces incorporated alpha-(32)P-labeled deoxynucleoside triphosphates but failed to join. Consequently, replicating chromosomes failed to extensively continue nascent DNA chain growth, and the conversion of viral replicating DNA into mature DNA was seven to eight times less than that observed in nuclear extracts. Addition of neither cytosol nor nucleosol corrected this problem. In the presence of cytosol, nonspecific endonuclease activity was not a problem in any of the three in vitro systems. Extensive purification of replicating chromosomes was limited by three as yet irreversible phenomena. First, replicating chromosomes isolated in a low-ionic-strength medium had a limited capability to continue DNA synthesis. Second, diluting either nuclear extracts or replicating chromosomes before incubation in vitro stimulated total DNA synthesis but was accompanied by the simultaneous appearance of small-molecular-weight nascent DNA not associated with intact viral DNA templates and a decrease in the synthesis of covalently closed viral DNA. Although this second phenomenon appeared similar to the first, template concentration alone could not account for the failure of purified replicating chromosomes to yield covalently closed DNA. Finally, preparation of nucleoprotein complexes in increasing concentrations of NaCl progressively decreased their ability to continue DNA replication. Exposure to 0.3 M NaCl removed one or more factors required for DNA synthesis which could be replaced by addition of cytosol. However, higher NaCl concentrations yielded nucleoprotein complexes that had relatively no endogenous DNA synthesis activity and that no longer responded to cytosol. These data demonstrate that continuation of endogenous DNA replication in vitro requires both the soluble cytosol fraction and a complex nucleoprotein template whose ability to continue DNA synthesis depends on its concentration and ionic environment during its preparation.     

Vaccinia Virus DNA Replication Occurs in Endoplasmic Reticulum-enclosed Cytoplasmic Mini-Nuclei

Vaccinia virus (vv), a member of the poxvirus family, is unique among most DNA viruses in that its replication occurs in the cytoplasm of the infected host cell. Although this viral process is known to occur in distinct cytoplasmic sites, little is known about its organization and in particular its relation with cellular membranes. The present study shows by electron microscopy (EM) that soon after initial vv DNA synthesis at 2 h postinfection, the sites become entirely surrounded by membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Complete wrapping requires ~45 min and persists until virion assembly is initiated at 6 h postinfection, and the ER dissociates from the replication sites. [(3)H]Thymidine incorporation at different infection times shows that efficient vv DNA synthesis coincides with complete ER wrapping, suggesting that the ER facilitates viral replication. Proteins known to be associated with the nuclear envelope in interphase cells are not targeted to these DNA-surrounding ER membranes, ruling out a role for these molecules in the wrapping process. By random green fluorescent protein-tagging of vv early genes of unknown function with a putative transmembrane domain, a novel vv protein, the gene product of E8R, was identified that is targeted to the ER around the DNA sites. Antibodies raised against this vv early membrane protein showed, by immunofluorescence microscopy, a characteristic ring-like pattern around the replication site. By electron microscopy quantitation the protein concentrated in the ER surrounding the DNA site and was preferentially targeted to membrane facing the inside of this site. These combined data are discussed in relation to nuclear envelope assembly/disassembly as it occurs during the cell cycle.     

Unwinding of Parental Strands During Simian Virus 40 DNA Replication

Pools of young (less than 60% replicated) and mature (60-90% replicated) replicating molecules of simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA have been treated at pH 12.2 in order to dissociate growing chains from the parental strands. The molecules are neutralized so that the parental strands can reassociate and they have then been isolated. They are covalently closed structures which sediment rapidly in alkaline sucrose gradients; however, the sedimentation rates are less than the sedimentation rate of SV40 DNA I. Isopycnic banding in CsCl-ethidium bromide and sedimentation velocity studies in the presence of various amounts of ethidium bromide indicate that these structures contain negative superhelical turns and several-fold-higher superhelix densities than SV40 DNA I (the covalently closed DNA molecule). These structures are those that would be predicted if nicking, unwinding, and sealing of the parental strands occurred as replication proceeded. These experiments provide a direct demonstration that there is a progressive decrease in the topological winding number which accompanies SV40 DNA replication.     

ATR and ATRIP Are Recruited to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Replication Compartments Even though ATR Signaling Is Disabled

Although the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) genome might be expected to induce a DNA damage response, the ATR kinase is not activated in infected cells. We previously proposed that spatial uncoupling of ATR from its interaction partner, ATRIP, could be the basis for inactivation of the ATR kinase in infected cells; however, we now show that ATR and ATRIP are in fact both recruited to HSV-1 replication compartments and can be coimmunoprecipitated from infected-cell lysates. ATRIP and replication protein A (RPA) are recruited to the earliest detectable prereplicative sites, stage II microfoci. In a normal cellular DNA damage response, ATR/ATRIP are recruited to stretches of RPA-coated single-stranded DNA in an RPA- and kinase-dependent manner, resulting in the phosphorylation of RPA by ATR in damage foci. In contrast, in HSV-1-infected cells, RPA is not phosphorylated, and endogenous phosphorylated RPA is excluded from stage II microfoci; in addition, the recruitment of ATR/ATRIP is independent of RPA and the kinase activity of ATR. Furthermore, we show that ATR/ATRIP play a beneficial role in viral gene expression and virus production. Although ICP0 has been shown to be important for partial inactivation of other cellular DNA repair pathways, we show that ICP0 is not responsible for the inactivation of ATR signaling and, furthermore, that neither ATR nor ATRIP is a target of ICP0 degradation. Thus, ATR and ATRIP may function outside the context of the canonical ATR damage signaling pathway during HSV-1 infection to participate in the viral life cycle.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is a large linear double-stranded DNA virus that replicates in the nucleus of the host cell. The incoming viral genome contains nicks and gaps (42), and cellular DNA repair machinery might be expected to recognize it as damaged, resulting in the activation of one or more cellular DNA damage pathways. Activation of DNA damage response pathways can result not only in repair of the damaged DNA but also in cell cycle arrest, gene silencing, and apoptosis (9). The later outcomes could result in suppression of viral gene expression and DNA replication and thus have negative consequences for lytic infection. Activation of a cellular DNA damage response during viral infection could, therefore, represent a form of intrinsic antiviral immunity (14, 15). On the other hand, HSV-1 and other DNA viruses which replicate in the nucleus have also been shown to utilize cellular DNA repair machinery to promote productive infection (28). Thus, HSV-1 has apparently evolved to manipulate the host DNA damage response by utilizing some components and inactivating others in an attempt to create an environment conducive to lytic viral infection.The cellular DNA damage response is regulated by the three phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs), DNA-PK (DNA-dependent protein kinase), ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated), and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) (1, 9). DNA-PK and ATM respond predominantly to double-strand breaks, and ATR responds to stalled replication forks and long stretches of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). DNA-PK is required for nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), while ATM activation promotes homologous recombination. Interestingly, in some cell types, the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK (DNA-PKcs) is proteolytically degraded during infection by the immediate-early (IE) protein ICP0, a viral E3 ubiquitin ligase (25, 37), thereby resulting in the probable inactivation of the NHEJ pathway. ATM kinase activity, on the other hand, is activated during HSV-1 infection once viral DNA replication is initiated (26, 47, 56). Despite phosphorylation of several ATM targets, ATM signaling is also modulated by ICP0, which degrades the ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168. The function of these ubiquitin ligases is to promote the tethering of ATM pathway proteins at sites of cellular DNA damage (27). Thus, ICP0 functions to partially inactivate portions of both the DNA-PK- and ATM-mediated repair pathways.During a cellular DNA damage response, ATM activation and processing of DNA ends generate ssDNA adjacent to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), a structure that is known to activate ATR (9, 38). The ssDNA is coated by the cellular ssDNA binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), which then serves to recruit ATR through a direct interaction with ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP) (4, 12, 58). ATR signaling results in the phosphorylation of many substrates, including RPA and Chk1. During HSV-1 infection, the ATR substrates RPA and Chk1 are not phosphorylated (47, 54-56), indicating that ATR signaling may be disabled.A hallmark of HSV-1 infection is the reorganization of the infected-cell nucleus, resulting in the formation of large globular replication compartments as well as the rearrangement of cellular proteins involved in several homeostatic pathways. In addition to cellular DNA repair proteins, HSV-1 infection also causes the reorganization of components of the cellular protein quality control pathways, resulting in the formation of virus-induced chaperone-enriched (VICE) domains, which act to maintain nuclear protein quality control during infection (31). Viral gene expression, DNA replication, and encapsidation of viral genomes occur in replication compartments (24, 39, 41). In this work we revisit the study of proteins recruited to and restricted from replication compartments in an attempt to better understand how HSV-1 manipulates components of the cellular DNA damage response for its own benefit.     

细胞自噬与病毒复制

细胞自噬是真核生物中一种高度保守的细胞内容物降解过程,在维持细胞的内环境稳定中起着重要作用。同时,自噬参与固有免疫系统对病原微生物的识别,以帮助吞噬细胞进行有效的吞噬作用并清除细胞内外的病原体。而病毒,尤其是RNA病毒,具有快速进化以应对宿主细胞中的变化的能力,能通过利用或抑制宿主细胞的自噬作用来为自身的复制服务。因此,针对自噬途径的药物筛选和治疗策略越来越成为抗病毒研究的热点。     

Mutations That Increase DNA Binding by the Processivity Factor of Herpes Simplex Virus Affect Virus Production and DNA Replication Fidelity

The interactions of the herpes simplex virus processivity factor UL42 with the catalytic subunit of the viral polymerase (Pol) and DNA are critical for viral DNA replication. Previous studies, including one showing that substitution of glutamine residue 282 with arginine (Q282R) results in an increase of DNA binding in vitro, have indicated that the positively charged back surface of UL42 interacts with DNA. To investigate the biological consequences of increased DNA binding by UL42 mutations, we constructed two additional UL42 mutants, including one with a double substitution of alanine for aspartic acid residues (D270A/D271A) and a triple mutant with the D270A/D271A and Q282R substitutions. These UL42 mutants exhibited increased and prolonged DNA binding without an effect on binding to a peptide corresponding to the C terminus of Pol. Plasmids expressing any of the three UL42 mutants with an increased positive charge on the back surface of UL42 were qualitatively competent for complementation of growth and DNA replication of a UL42 null mutant on Vero cells. We then engineered viruses expressing these mutant proteins. The UL42 mutants were more resistant to detergent extraction than wild-type UL42, suggesting that they are more tightly associated with DNA in infected cells. All three UL42 mutants formed smaller plaques on Vero cells and replicated to reduced yields compared with results for a control virus expressing wild-type UL42. Moreover, mutants with double and triple mutations, which contain D270A/D271A mutations, exhibited increased mutation frequencies, and mutants containing the Q282R mutation exhibited elevated ratios of virion DNA copies per PFU. These results suggest that herpes simplex virus has evolved so that UL42 neither binds DNA too tightly nor too weakly to optimize virus production and replication fidelity.Processivity factors of DNA polymerases promote long-chain DNA synthesis by preventing dissociation of the DNA polymerase from the primer/template. Processivity factors also can influence DNA replication fidelity, as indicated by numerous in vivo and in vitro studies (1-3, 5, 6, 11, 12, 18, 28, 36). A major class of processivity factors known as “sliding clamps” includes proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) of eukaryotic cells (23) and gp45 of T4 bacteriophage (27). Sliding clamps are homodimers or homotrimers that encircle DNA and interact with the catalytic subunits (Pols) of their cognate DNA polymerases to promote processive DNA synthesis.A second class of processivity factors includes those encoded by herpesviruses and is exemplified by herpes simplex virus (HSV) UL42. UL42 forms a heterodimer with the HSV Pol. Both subunits are essential for production of infectious virus and for viral DNA replication (20, 26). UL42 can stimulate long-chain DNA synthesis by Pol, and template challenge experiments established that this stimulation is due to increased processivity (15). In addition to its interaction with Pol, which is mediated by the C terminus of Pol, UL42 also binds DNA directly with high affinity (14, 15, 30, 37). This mode of DNA binding differs from that of sliding clamps, which do not form high-affinity direct interactions with DNA (13) but must be loaded onto DNA with the aid of ATP-dependent clamp loaders for their normal functioning (16). Nevertheless, the structure of UL42 is very similar to a monomer of the sliding clamp PCNA (39). Like other processivity factors, UL42 also plays a role in maintaining DNA replication fidelity both in vivo and in vitro (5, 18).The “back face” (opposite face to the side that binds Pol) of a UL42 molecule contains several positively charged residues. By titrating the effects of cations on UL42 DNA binding, it was determined that charge-charge interactions are involved in the interaction (22). Substitutions of alanine for any of four arginine residues on the back face of UL42 resulted in substantial reductions in DNA binding without affecting the binding to peptide corresponding to the C terminus of Pol in vitro (31), while substitutions of lysine for arginine had little or no effect on DNA binding affinity (22). A UL42 mutant (Q282R) containing a substitution of arginine for a negatively charged glutamine residue on the back face of UL42 exhibited a fourfold increase in DNA binding without altering the interaction with the Pol C-terminal peptide in vitro (22). Therefore, the positively charged surface of UL42 is important for the interaction between UL42 and DNA. A question raised by these studies is whether UL42 could bind DNA so tightly as to affect HSV replication.Mutant viruses engineered to encode individual arginine-to-alanine substitution mutations in UL42 exhibit several phenotypes, including a delayed onset of viral DNA replication, reduced virus yields, and reduced fidelity of DNA replication (18). Recombinant viruses expressing UL42 with multiple substitutions of alanine for arginine residues exhibit even greater effects on viral DNA replication and virus yields (19). Thus, reducing DNA binding by UL42 deleteriously affects viral growth and DNA replication fidelity. However, these studies did not address whether increasing DNA binding by UL42 would have any effects on viral DNA replication, replication fidelity, or virus production.In this study we engineered two new UL42 mutant proteins (with the D270A/D271A or Q282R/D270A/D271A mutations) that contain less negative charge on the back face and examined the effects of these substitutions on DNA and Pol peptide binding. In addition, recombinant viruses were constructed to examine the effect of these multiple substitutions and the single Q282R substitution on virus production, DNA replication, and the fidelity of DNA replication.