Observations on the distribution of meroplankton during an upwelling event

The distribution of the larvae of benthic invertebrates wasinvestigated relative to hydrographic structures as a test ofthe hypothesis that larvae behave as if they are passive particles.Observations of larval and oceanographic distributions weremade off Duck, North Carolina, USA in August 1994. Conditionswere characterized by wind-driven coastal upwelling; flow wasgenerally offshore near the surface and onshore below the pycnocline.Within 5 km of the shore the pycnocline was bent upward by theupwelling and it intersected the surface along most of the transects.In zooplankton samples, 20 taxa of larvae were counted (10 bivalveveligers, nine gastropod veligers and one polychaete larvae).Using cluster analysis, larvae were separated into groups withsimilar patterns of distribution and similar affinities to waterproperties. The larvae in Cluster 3 did not display a consistentdistribution pattern beyond that they tended to be found inwarmer surface waters. An earlier paper described the distributionof larvae in the same location during a downwelling event [A.Shanks et al. (2002) J. Plankton Res., 24, 391–416]. Twoof the clusters identified during this previous study were quitesimilar in composition to Clusters 1 and 2 in this study. Inboth studies, Cluster 1 larvae were found below the pycnocline,but during the upwelling event they were transported shorewardwith the advection of the subpycnocline waters by the upwellingcirculation. Within 5 km of the shore, Cluster 1 larvae werefound at depths shallower than the base of the pycnocline andwere often found in patches of high larval concentration. Thepatches were located where the waters were upwelling. Cluster2 larvae were found within 5 km of the shore in both studiesand tended to be highly concentrated in convergences or divergences.Larvae in Cluster 1 generally appeared to be dispersing as passiveparticles, except within the zone of upwelling where they mayhave been swimming against the upwelling flow leading to higherlarval concentrations. Cluster 2 larvae appeared to be consistentlyconcentrated in areas of vertical currents, suggesting thatthey may be attempting to maintain a preferred depth in theface of the vertical flow which would lead to high larval concentrationand nearshore larval distributions despite extensive cross-shelfmovement of water. Despite their slow swimming speeds, the larvaein Clusters 1 and 2 were not swept offshore by the upwellingevent.     

Spatial and temporal distribution of two diazotrophic bacteria in the Chesapeake Bay

The aim of this study was to initiate autecological studies on uncultivated natural populations of diazotrophic bacteria by examining the distribution of specific diazotrophs in the Chesapeake Bay. By use of quantitative PCR, the abundance of two nifH sequences (907h22 and 912h4) was quantified in water samples collected along a transect from the head to the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay during cruises in April and October 2001 and 2002. Standard curves for the quantitative PCR assays demonstrated that the relationship between gene copies and cycle threshold was linear and highly reproducible from 1 to 10(7) gene copies. The maximum number of 907h22 gene copies detected was approximately 140 ml(-1) and the maximum number of 912h4 gene copies detected was approximately 340 ml(-1). Sequence 912h4 was most abundant at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay, and in general, its abundance increased with increasing salinity, with the highest abundances observed in April 2002. Overall, the 907h22 phylotype was most abundant at the mid-bay station. Additionally, 907h22 was most abundant in the April samples from the mid-bay and mouth of the Chesapeake Bay. Despite the fact that the Chesapeake Bay is rarely nitrogen limited, our results show that individual nitrogen-fixing bacteria have distinct nonrandom spatial and seasonal distributions in the Chesapeake Bay and are either distributed by specific physical processes or adapted to different environmental niches.     

Bacteria of the gamma-subclass Proteobacteria associated with zooplankton in Chesapeake Bay

The seasonal abundance of gamma-subclass Proteobacteria, Vibrio-Photobacterium, Vibrio cholerae-Vibrio mimicus, Vibrio cincinnatiensis, and Vibrio vulnificus in the Choptank River of Chesapeake Bay associated with zooplankton was monitored from April to December 1996. Large (>202- microm) and small (64- to 202- microm) size classes of zooplankton were collected, and the bacteria associated with each of the zooplankton size classes were enumerated by fluorescent oligonucleotide direct count. Large populations of bacteria were found to be associated with both the large and small size classes of zooplankton. Also, the species of bacteria associated with the zooplankton showed seasonal abundance, with the largest numbers occurring in the early spring and again in the summer, when zooplankton total numbers were correspondingly large. Approximately 0.01 to 40.0% of the total water column bacteria were associated with zooplankton, with the percentage of the total water column bacteria population associated with zooplankton varying by season. A taxonomically diverse group of bacteria was associated with zooplankton, and a larger proportion was found in and on zooplankton during the cooler months of the year, with selected taxa comprising a larger percent of the Bacteria in the summer. V. cholerae-V. mimicus and V. vulnificus comprised the bulk of the large and small zooplankton-associated Vibrio-Photobacterium species. In contrast, V. cincinnatiensis accounted for less than 0.1 to 3%. It is concluded that water column and zooplankton bacterial populations vary independently with respect to species composition since no correlation was observed between taxa occurring with highest frequency in the water column and those in association with zooplankton.     

Abundance and distribution of Synechococcus spp. and cyanophages in the Chesapeake Bay

Despite the increasing knowledge of Synechococcus spp. and their co-occurring cyanophages in oceanic and coastal water, little is known about their abundance, distribution, and interactions in the Chesapeake Bay estuarine ecosystem. A 5-year interannual survey shows that Synechococcus spp. and their phages are persistent and abundant members of Chesapeake Bay microbial communities. Synechococcus blooms (10⁶ cells ml⁻¹) were often observed in summer throughout the Bay, contributing 20 to 40% of total phytoplankton chlorophyll a. The distribution of phycoerythrin-containing (PE-rich) Synechococcus cells appeared to mostly correlate with the salinity gradient, with higher abundances at higher salinities. Cyanophages infectious to Synechococcus were also abundant (up to 6 × 10⁵ viruses ml⁻¹ by the most probable number assay) during summer months in the Bay. The covariation in abundance of Synechococcus spp. and cyanophages was evident, although the latitude of observed positive correlation varied in different years, mirroring the changing environmental conditions and therefore the host-virus interactions. The impacts of cyanophages on host Synechococcus populations also varied spatially and temporally. Higher phage-related Synechococcus mortality was observed in drought years. Virus-mediated host mortality and subsequent liberation of dissolved organic matter (DOM) may substantially influence oceanic biogeochemical processing through the microbial loop as well as the microbial carbon pump. These observations emphasize the influence of environmental gradients on natural Synechococcus spp. and their phage population dynamics in the estuarine ecosystem.     

Vertical and spatial distribution of the near-shore littoral meroplankton off the Bay of Blanes (NW Mediterranean Sea)

The total number of meroplankton larvae collected off the Bayof Blanes (NW Mediterranean) on 12 April 1995 ranged from 113to 203 ind. m^–3. Bivalve veligers were the most abundant,followed by polychaete larvae, among which those from the hesionids,spionids and nephtyds were dominant Larval abundances were higherin the deeper half of the water column and decreased just nearthe bottom, except in the shallowest confined site.     

Spatial and temporal aspects of Gyrodinium galatheanum in Chesapeake Bay: distribution and mixotrophy

Gyrodinium galatheanum (Braarud) Taylor 1995 is a common bloom-forming,potentially toxic photosynthetic dinoflagellate in ChesapeakeBay, USA. Abundance of this dinoflagellate achieved densities>4 x 10³ cells ml^–1 in the mid- and upper Bay duringlate spring and early summer of 1995 and 1996. Ingestion ofcryptophytes by this dinoflagellate was detected in most samplescollected from the Bay. During late spring and early summer,mean number of ingested cryptophytes per G.galatheanum was ashigh as 0.46 for dinoflagellate populations located in surfacewaters of the mid- and upper Bay where dissolved inorganic phosphoruswas low. Observations on the distribution of G.galatheanum inChesapeake Bay show that populations of this dinoflagellatewere usually restricted to waters with salinities ranging from7 to 18 psu, seasonally progressed up the estuary, and usuallyco-occurred with cryptophytes. Correlation analysis indicatesthat abundance of G.galatheanum and incidence of feeding wasnegatively correlated with dissolved inorganic phosphorus, andthat incidence of feeding was positively correlated with abundanceof cryptophyte prey. These results indicate that G.galatheanumis an important component of the Chesapeake Bay phytoplanktonduring the spring and summer. Our results suggest that the phagotrophiccapability possessed by this phototrophic dinoflagellate maycontribute to its success in a varying-resource environmentlike Chesapeake Bay.     

The distribution and temporal dynamics of the estuarine macroalgal community of San Francisco Bay

Long-term sampling of intertidal macroalgae along permanently marked transects within San Francisco Bay has shown a marked decline in overall species number along the estuarine gradient from the ocean to the river, presumably as a result of decreasing salinity and a progressive lack of hard substrata in the upstream direction. Green algae penetrated further landward than either brown or red species. Seasonally, macroalgal species diversity is lowest during the winter-spring months when salinity, temperature, and irradiance are at yearly minima. Macroalgal abundance as measured by percent cover was maximum during the late spring near the mouth of the estuary and during late summer towards the head. The seasonal increase in algal abundance is related to increasing salinity, temperature, and light availability to the bottom. The summer increase in irradiance is due to the longer photoperiod, increased frequency of day-time low tides, and reduced levels of suspended sediments. The aperiodic occurrence of algal blooms in San Pablo Bay may be caused by a combination of physical factors which are ultimately associated with the river inflow. A hypothesis based on interannual differences in river inflow and the contribution of phytoplankton to nutrient cycles in the benthos is presented to explain the occurrence of nuisance algal blooms.     

Isolation and Diversity of Actinomycetes in the Chesapeake Bay

Chesapeake Bay was investigated as a source of actinomycetes to screen for production of novel bioactive compounds. The presence of relatively large populations of actinoplanetes (chemotype II/D actinomycetes) in Chesapeake Bay sediment samples indicates that it is an eminently suitable ecosystem from which to isolate actinomycetes for screening programs. Actinomycetes were isolated from sediment samples collected in Chesapeake Bay with an isolation medium containing nalidixic acid, which proved to be more effective than heat pretreatment of samples. Actinomycete counts ranged from a high of 1.4 × 10⁵ to a low of 1.8 × 10² CFU/ml of sediment. Actinomycetes constituted 0.15 to 8.63% of the culturable microbial community. The majority of isolates from the eight stations studied were actinoplanetes (i.e., chemotype II/D), and 249 of these isolates were obtained in a total of 298 actinomycete isolates. Antimicrobial activity profiles indicated that diverse populations of actinoplanetes were present at each station. DNA hybridization studies showed considerable diversity among isolates between stations, but indicated that actinoplanete strains making up populations at nearby stations were more similar to each other than to populations sampled at distant stations. The diversity of actinoplanetes and the ease with which these organisms were isolated from Chesapeake Bay sediments make this a useful source of these actinomycetes.     

An outbreak of fowl cholera in waterfowl on the Chesapeake Bay

An outbreak of fowl cholera (Pasteurella multocida infection) occurred in waterfowl wintering on the Chesapeake Bay during February to March 1970. Losses were primarily confined to sea ducks: oldsquaws (Clangula hyemalis), white-winged scoters (Melanitta deglandi), goldeneyes (Bucephala clangula), and buffleheads (Bucephala albeola).     

Environmental influences on seasonal distribution of coastal and estuarine fish assemblages at Wemindji,eastern James Bay

Synopsis The coastal fish assemblages of Wemindji, eastern James Bay, were studied in 1987 and 1988 to describe seasonal utilization of the Maquatua River estuary and the adjacent coastal waters by marine and anadromous fishes. Fish diversity was low (11 sp.) and experimental gill net catches were highly variable between sites in the estuary and coastal waters, and also seasonally at a given site. During summer, the estuarine fishes were numerically dominated by two marine species, the fourhorn sculpin,Myoxocephalus quadricornis, and the slender eelblenny,Lumpenus fabricii, and also by juvenile cisco,Coregonus artedii, and juvenile lake whitefish,C. clupeaformis. In coastal waters, three marine species were abundant: the shorthorn sculpin,M. scorpius, the arctic sculpin,M. scorpioides and the Greenland cod.Gadus ogac. In contrast with the estuary, large (> 270 mm) cisco and lake whitefish were abundant in coastal waters indicating extensive movements of these species in James Bay during the summer. Distribution patterns were influenced by a combination of physical conditions (salinity and temperature) and biological characteristics (habitat choice, migration and reproduction) depending on the season.     

Bacterial dynamics and distribution during a spring diatom bloom in the Hudson River plume, USA

Bacterial abundance and [³H]thymidine incorporation rates wereused to characterize bacterial distributions and dynamics duringa spring diatom bloom in the coastal plume of the Hudson Riverduring March, 1981. Bacterial abundance did not decline significantlyaway from the plume or across the continental shelf. However,a pronounced gradient was observed for [³H]thymidine incorporation. Following a northeast gale, a bloom of Skeletonema costatumdeveloped in response to coastal upwelling. As the plume becamesaltier, warmer and larger, bacterial abundance averaged 1.3x 10⁹ cells 1^–1. Bacterial incorporation of [³H]thymidineinto cold 5% TCA insoluble materials, bacterial production andspecific growth rates averaged 80–120 pmol 1^–1 d^–1,1.4–2.0 x 10⁹ cells 1^–1 and 1.2–1.5 d^–1.respectively. The mean density of bacteria in the plume didnot change even though growth rates were higher than expectedlosses from sinking, mixing and export. The abundance and production levels of attached bacteria inthe plume were significantly higher than they were in coastalwater outside the plume. In contrast, free bacterial levelswere similar in all regions of the shelf and plume. Bacterialparameters in the plume were not correlated with phytoplanktonpigment concentrations, while significant positive correlationswere found in shelf waters >33 salinity. Thus bacteria werecoupled to phytoplankton in shelf waters but not in the plumewhere allochthonous dissolved matter was probably supportingthe bacteria. ^*Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory Contribution No. 3459²Present address: Department of Microbiology, University ofGeorgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.     

Comparative study of the aerobic, heterotrophic bacterial flora of Chesapeake Bay and Tokyo Bay.

A comparative study of the bacterial flora of the water of Chesapeake Bay and Tokyo Bay was undertaken to assess similarities and differences between the autochthonous flora of the two geographical sites and to test the hypothesis that, given similarities in environmental parameters, similar bacterial populations will be found, despite extreme geographic distance between locations. A total of 195 aerobic, heterotrophic bacterial strains isolated from Chesapeake Bay and Tokyo Bay water were examined for 115 biochemical, cultural, morphological, nutritional, and physiological characters. The data were analyzed by the methods of numerical taxonomy. From sorted similarity matrices, 77% of the isolates could be grouped into 30 phena and presumptively identified as Acinetobacter-Moraxella, Caulobacter, coryneforms, Pseudomonas, and Vibrio spp. Vibrio and Acinetobacter species were found to be common in the estuarine waters of Chesapeake Bay, whereas Acinetobacter-Moraxella and Caulobacter predominated in Tokyo Bay waters, at the sites sampled in the study.     

Comparative study of the aerobic, heterotrophic bacterial flora of Chesapeake Bay and Tokyo Bay.

A comparative study of the bacterial flora of the water of Chesapeake Bay and Tokyo Bay was undertaken to assess similarities and differences between the autochthonous flora of the two geographical sites and to test the hypothesis that, given similarities in environmental parameters, similar bacterial populations will be found, despite extreme geographic distance between locations. A total of 195 aerobic, heterotrophic bacterial strains isolated from Chesapeake Bay and Tokyo Bay water were examined for 115 biochemical, cultural, morphological, nutritional, and physiological characters. The data were analyzed by the methods of numerical taxonomy. From sorted similarity matrices, 77% of the isolates could be grouped into 30 phena and presumptively identified as Acinetobacter-Moraxella, Caulobacter, coryneforms, Pseudomonas, and Vibrio spp. Vibrio and Acinetobacter species were found to be common in the estuarine waters of Chesapeake Bay, whereas Acinetobacter-Moraxella and Caulobacter predominated in Tokyo Bay waters, at the sites sampled in the study.     

Macrobenthic Communities of the Lower Chesapeake Bay. II. Lynn-haven Roads,Lynnhaven Bay,Broad Bay,and Linkhorn Bay

Based on 96 grab samples at 16 sites the composition and distribution of macrobenthic fauna were examined in a small coastal basin of lower Chesapeake Bay. Normal classification analysis of dominant species produced five site groups. Site groups were divided into clean sand sites, fine sand sites with varying amounts of silt-clay, and mud sites. Dominant species of the clean group were primarily restricted to this sediment type, while the dominant species of the other groups were widespread in the study area.     

Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Two Diazotrophic Bacteria in the Chesapeake Bay

The aim of this study was to initiate autecological studies on uncultivated natural populations of diazotrophic bacteria by examining the distribution of specific diazotrophs in the Chesapeake Bay. By use of quantitative PCR, the abundance of two nifH sequences (907h22 and 912h4) was quantified in water samples collected along a transect from the head to the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay during cruises in April and October 2001 and 2002. Standard curves for the quantitative PCR assays demonstrated that the relationship between gene copies and cycle threshold was linear and highly reproducible from 1 to 10⁷ gene copies. The maximum number of 907h22 gene copies detected was approximately 140 ml⁻¹ and the maximum number of 912h4 gene copies detected was approximately 340 ml⁻¹. Sequence 912h4 was most abundant at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay, and in general, its abundance increased with increasing salinity, with the highest abundances observed in April 2002. Overall, the 907h22 phylotype was most abundant at the mid-bay station. Additionally, 907h22 was most abundant in the April samples from the mid-bay and mouth of the Chesapeake Bay. Despite the fact that the Chesapeake Bay is rarely nitrogen limited, our results show that individual nitrogen-fixing bacteria have distinct nonrandom spatial and seasonal distributions in the Chesapeake Bay and are either distributed by specific physical processes or adapted to different environmental niches.     

Distribution and Significance of Fecal Indicator Organisms in the Upper Chesapeake Bay

Total viable aerobic, heterotrophic bacteria, total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and fecal streptococci were enumerated in samples collected at five stations located in the Upper Chesapeake Bay, December 1973 through December 1974. Significant levels of pollution indicator organisms were detected at all of the stations sampled. Highest counts were observed in samples collected at the confluence of the Susquehanna River and the Chesapeake Bay. The indicator organisms examined were observed to be quantitatively distributed independently of temperature and salinity. Counts were not found to be correlated with concentration of suspended sediment. However, significant proportions of both the total viable bacteria (53%) and fecal indicator organisms (>80%) were directly associated with suspended sediments. Correlation coefficients (r) for the indicator organisms examined in this study ranged from r = 0.80 to r = 0.99 for bottom water and suspended sediment, respectively. Prolonged survival of fecal streptococci in most of the sediment samples was observed, with concomitant reduction of the correlation coefficient from r = 0.99, fecal streptococci to total coliforms in water, to r = 0.01, fecal streptococci to fecal coliforms in sediments. The results of this study compared favorably with fecal coliforms: fecal streptococci ratios for the various sample types. Characterization of organisms beyond the confirmed most-probable-number procedure provided good correlation between bacterial indicator groups.     

Morphological variation and phylogenetic analysis of the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium aureolum from a tributary of Chesapeake Bay

Cultures of four strains of the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium aureolum (Hulburt) G. Hansen were established from the Elizabeth River, a tidal tributary of the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, nuclear-encoded large sub-unit rDNA sequencing, and culturing observations were conducted to further characterize this species. Observations of morphology included: a multiple structured apical groove; a peduncle located between the emerging points of the two flagella; pentagonal and hexagonal vesicles on the amphiesma; production and germination of resting cysts; variation in the location of the nucleus within the center of the cell; a longitudinal ventral concavity; and considerable variation in cell width/length and overall cell size. A fish bioassay using juvenile sheepshead minnows detected no ichthyotoxicity from any of the strains over a 48-h period. Molecular analysis confirmed the dinoflagellate was conspecific with G. aureolum strains from around the world, and formed a cluster along with several other Gymnodinium species. Morphological evidence suggests that further research is necessary to examine the relationship between G. aureolum and a possibly closely related species Gymnodinium maguelonnense.