Roles of molecular chaperones in cytoplasmic protein folding

Newly synthesized polypeptide chains must fold and assemble into unique three-dimensional structures in order to become functionally active. In many cases productive folding depends on assistance from molecular chaperones, which act in preventing off-pathway reactions during folding that lead to aggregation. The inherent tendency of incompletely folded polypeptide chains to aggregate is thought to be strongly enhanced$L in vivo *I$Lby the high macromolecular concentration of the cellular solution, resulting in crowding effects, and by the close proximity of nascent polypeptide chains during synthesis on polyribosomes. The major classes of chaperones acting in cytoplasmic protein folding are the Hsp70s and the chaperonins. Hsp70 chaperones shield the hydrophobic regions of nascent and incompletely folded chains, whereas the chaperonins provide a sequestered environment in which folding can proceed unimpaired by intermolecular interactions between non-native polypeptides. These two principles of chaperone action can function in a coordinated manner to ensure the efficient folding of a subset of cytoplasmic proteins.     

Molecular chaperones in protein quality control

Proteins must fold into their correct three-dimensional conformation in order to attain their biological function. Conversely, protein aggregation and misfolding are primary contributors to many devastating human diseases, such as prion-mediated infections, Alzheimer's disease, type II diabetes and cystic fibrosis. While the native conformation of a polypeptide is encoded within its primary amino acid sequence and is sufficient for protein folding in vitro, the situation in vivo is more complex. Inside the cell, proteins are synthesized or folded continuously; a process that is greatly assisted by molecular chaperones. Molecular chaperones are a group of structurally diverse and mechanistically distinct proteins that either promote folding or prevent the aggregation of other proteins. With our increasing understanding of the proteome, it is becoming clear that the number of proteins that can be classified as molecular chaperones is increasing steadily. Many of these proteins have novel but essential cellular functions that differ from that of more "conventional" chaperones, such as Hsp70 and the GroE system. This review focuses on the emerging role of molecular chaperones in protein quality control, i.e. the mechanism that rids the cell of misfolded or incompletely synthesized polypeptides that otherwise would interfere with normal cellular function.     

Contribution of molecular chaperones to protein folding in the cytoplasm of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells

While it is clear that many unfolded proteins can attain their native state spontaneously in vitro, the efficiency of such folding is usually limited to conditions far removed from those encountered within cells. Two properties of the cellular environment are expected to enhance strongly the propensity of incompletely folded polypeptides to misfold and aggregate: the crowding effect caused by the high concentration of macromolecules, and the close proximity of nascent polypeptide chains emerging from polyribosomes. However, in the living cell, non-productive protein folding is in many, if not most, cases prevented by the action of a highly conserved set of proteins termed molecular chaperones. In the cytoplasm, the Hsp70 (heat-shock protein of 70 kDa) and chaperonin families of molecular chaperones appear to be the major contributors to efficient protein folding during both normal conditions and adverse conditions such as heat stress. Hsp70 chaperones recognize and shield short, hydrophobic peptide segments in the context of non-native polypeptides and probably promote folding by decreasing the concentration of aggregation-prone intermediates. In contrast, the chaperonins interact with and globally enclose collapsed folding intermediates in a central cavity where efficient folding can proceed in a protected environment. For a number of proteins, folding requires the co-ordinated action of both of these molecular chaperones.     

GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible

Protein folding is a spontaneous process that is essential for life, yet the concentrated and complex interior of a cell is an inherently hostile environment for the efficient folding of many proteins. Some proteins-constrained by sequence, topology, size, and function-simply cannot fold by themselves and are instead prone to misfolding and aggregation. This problem is so deeply entrenched that a specialized family of proteins, known as molecular chaperones, evolved to assist in protein folding. Here we examine one essential class of molecular chaperones, the large, oligomeric, and energy utilizing chaperonins or Hsp60s. The bacterial chaperonin GroEL, along with its co-chaperonin GroES, is probably the best-studied example of this family of protein-folding machine. In this review, we examine some of the general properties of proteins that do not fold well in the absence of GroEL and then consider how folding of these proteins is enhanced by GroEL and GroES. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that chaperonins like GroEL and GroES employ a combination of protein isolation, unfolding, and conformational restriction to drive protein folding under conditions where it is otherwise not possible.     

GroEL-Mediated Protein Folding: Making the Impossible,Possible

ABSTRACT

Protein folding is a spontaneous process that is essential for life, yet the concentrated and complex interior of a cell is an inherently hostile environment for the efficient folding of many proteins. Some proteins—constrained by sequence, topology, size, and function—simply cannot fold by themselves and are instead prone to misfolding and aggregation. This problem is so deeply entrenched that a specialized family of proteins, known as molecular chaperones, evolved to assist in protein folding. Here we examine one essential class of molecular chaperones, the large, oligomeric, and energy utilizing chaperonins or Hsp60s. The bacterial chaperonin GroEL, along with its co-chaperonin GroES, is probably the best-studied example of this family of protein-folding machine. In this review, we examine some of the general properties of proteins that do not fold well in the absence of GroEL and then consider how folding of these proteins is enhanced by GroEL and GroES. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that chaperonins like GroEL and GroES employ a combination of protein isolation, unfolding, and conformational restriction to drive protein folding under conditions where it is otherwise not possible.     

Assembly of chaperonin complexes

Chaperonins are a subclass of molecular chaperones that assist both the folding of newly synthesized proteins and the maintenance of proteins in a folded state during periods of stress. The best studied members of this family are the type I chaperonins, occurring in bacteria and evolutionarily derived organelles. Type II chaperonins occur in archaea and the eukaryotic cytosol. An intriguing question pertains to the mechanism by which chaperonins themselves are folded and assembled into functional oligomers. The available evidence for the assembly/disassembly of type I and II chaperonins points to a process that is highly cooperative and suggests a prominent role for nucleotides. Interestingly, the intracellular assembly of type I chaperonins appears to be a chaperone-dependent process itself and requires functional preformed chaperonin complexes.     

Different mechanistic requirements for prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins: a lattice study

MOTIVATION: The folding of many proteins in vivo and in vitro is assisted by molecular chaperones. A well-characterized molecular chaperone system is the chaperonin GroEL/GroES from Escherichia coli which has a homolog found in the eukaryotic cytosol called CCT. All chaperonins have a ring structure with a cavity in which the substrate protein folds. An interesting difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins is in the nature of the ATP-mediated conformational changes that their ring structures undergo during their reaction cycle. Prokaryotic chaperonins are known to exhibit a highly cooperative concerted change of their cavity surface while in eukaryotic chaperonins the change is sequential. Approximately 70% of proteins in eukaryotic cells are multi-domain whereas in prokaryotes single-domain proteins are more common. Thus, it was suggested that the different modes of action of prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins can be explained by the need of eukaryotic chaperonins to facilitate folding of multi-domain proteins. RESULTS: Using a 2D square lattice model, we generated two large populations of single-domain and double-domain substrate proteins. Chaperonins were modeled as static structures with a cavity wall with which the substrate protein interacts. We simulated both concerted and sequential changes of the cavity surfaces and demonstrated that folding of single-domain proteins benefits from concerted but not sequential changes whereas double-domain proteins benefit also from sequential changes. Thus, our results support the suggestion that the different modes of allosteric switching of prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonin rings have functional implications as it enables eukaryotic chaperonins to better assist multi-domain protein folding.     

Structure and functions of chaperones and chaperonins (Review)

Folding and assembling of newly synthesized proteins is directed and effected by a group of relatively recently discovered proteins called molecular chaperones. These proteins not only control the assembling of native structures; they also remodel protein molecules that have wrong conformations. All molecular chaperones perform the same function, but structurally they are divided into groups of chaperones and chaperonins. These proteins are highly conserved in evolution and display an ATPase activity. Certain known chaperones and chaperonins are shown in the table, and their structures and mechanisms of action are described.     

Structures and Functions of Chaperones and Chaperonins (Review)

Folding and assembling of newly synthesized proteins is directed and effected by a group of relatively recently discovered proteins called molecular chaperones. These proteins not only control the assembling of native structures; they also remodel protein molecules that have wrong conformations. All molecular chaperones perform the same function, but structurally they are divided into groups of chaperones and chaperonins. These proteins are highly conserved in evolution and display an ATPase activity. Certain known chaperones and chaperonins are shown in the table, and their structures and mechanisms of action are described.     

Multiple chaperonins in bacteria—novel functions and non-canonical behaviors

Chaperonins are a class of molecular chaperones that assemble into a large double ring architecture with each ring constituting seven to nine subunits and enclosing a cavity for substrate encapsulation. The well-studied Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL binds non-native substrates and encapsulates them in the cavity thereby sequestering the substrates from unfavorable conditions and allowing the substrates to fold. Using this mechanism, GroEL assists folding of about 10–15 % of cellular proteins. Surprisingly, about 30 % of the bacteria express multiple chaperonin genes. The presence of multiple chaperonins raises questions on whether they increase general chaperoning ability in the cell or have developed specific novel cellular roles. Although the latter view is widely supported, evidence for the former is beginning to appear. Some of these chaperonins can functionally replace GroEL in E. coli and are generally indispensable, while others are ineffective and likewise are dispensable. Additionally, moonlighting functions for several chaperonins have been demonstrated, indicating a functional diversity among the chaperonins. Furthermore, proteomic studies have identified diverse substrate pools for multiple chaperonins. We review the current perception on multiple chaperonins and their physiological and functional specificities.     

Translocation boost protein-folding efficiency of double-barreled chaperonins

Incorrect folding of proteins in living cells may lead to malfunctioning of the cell machinery. To prevent such cellular disasters from happening, all cells contain molecular chaperones that assist nonnative proteins in folding into the correct native structure. One of the most studied chaperone complexes is the GroEL-GroES complex. The GroEL part has a "double-barrel" structure, which consists of two cylindrical chambers joined at the bottom in a symmetrical fashion. The hydrophobic rim of one of the GroEL chambers captures nonnative proteins. The GroES part acts as a lid that temporarily closes the filled chamber during the folding process. Several capture-folding-release cycles are required before the nonnative protein reaches its native state. Here we report molecular simulations that suggest that translocation of the nonnative protein through the equatorial plane of the complex boosts the efficiency of the chaperonin action. If the target protein is correctly folded after translocation, it is released. However, if it is still nonnative, it is likely to remain trapped in the second chamber, which then closes to start a reverse translocation process. This shuttling back and forth continues until the protein is correctly folded. Our model provides a natural explanation for the prevalence of double-barreled chaperonins. Moreover, we argue that internal folding is both more efficient and safer than a scenario where partially refolded proteins escape from the complex before being recaptured.     

Chaperones Rescue Luciferase Folding by Separating Its Domains

Over the last 50 years, significant progress has been made toward understanding how small single-domain proteins fold. However, very little is known about folding mechanisms of medium and large multidomain proteins that predominate the proteomes of all forms of life. Large proteins frequently fold cotranslationally and/or require chaperones. Firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase (Luciferase, 550 residues) has been a model of a cotranslationally folding protein whose extremely slow refolding (approximately days) is catalyzed by chaperones. However, the mechanism by which Luciferase misfolds and how chaperones assist Luciferase refolding remains unknown. Here we combine single-molecule force spectroscopy (atomic force microscopy (AFM)/single-molecule force spectroscopy) with steered molecular dynamic computer simulations to unravel the mechanism of chaperone-assisted Luciferase refolding. Our AFM and steered molecular dynamic results show that partially unfolded Luciferase, with the N-terminal domain remaining folded, can refold robustly without chaperones. Complete unfolding causes Luciferase to get trapped in very stable non-native configurations involving interactions between N- and C-terminal residues. However, chaperones allow the completely unfolded Luciferase to refold quickly in AFM experiments, strongly suggesting that chaperones are able to sequester non-natively contacting residues. More generally, we suggest that many chaperones, rather than actively promoting the folding, mimic the ribosomal exit tunnel and physically separate protein domains, allowing them to fold in a cotranslational-like sequential process.     

All three chaperonin genes in the archaeon Haloferax volcanii are individually dispensable

The Hsp60 or chaperonin class of molecular chaperones is divided into two phylogenetic groups: group I, found in bacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts, and group II, found in eukaryotic cytosol and archaea. Group I chaperonins are generally essential in bacteria, although when multiple copies are found one or more of these are dispensable. Eukaryotes contain eight genes for group II chaperonins, all of which are essential, and it has been shown that these proteins assemble into double-ring complexes with eightfold symmetry where all proteins occupy specific positions in the ring. In archaea, there are one, two or three genes for the group II chaperonins, but whether they are essential for growth is unknown. Here we describe a detailed genetic, structural and biochemical analysis of these proteins in the halophilic archaeon, Haloferax volcanii. This organism contains three genes for group II chaperonins, and we show that all are individually dispensable but at least one must be present for growth. Two of the three possible double mutants can be constructed, but only one of the three genes is capable of fully complementing the stress-dependent phenotypes that these double mutants show. The chaperonin complexes are made up of hetero-oligomers with eightfold symmetry, and the properties of the different combinations of subunits derived from the mutants are distinct. We conclude that, although they are more homologous to eukaryotic than prokaryotic chaperonins, archaeal chaperonins have some redundancy of function.     

Folding on the chaperone: yield enhancement through loose binding

A variety of small cageless chaperones have been discovered that can assist protein folding without the consumption of ATP. These include mini-chaperones (catalytically active fragments of larger chaperones), as well as small proteins such as alpha-casein and detergents acting as "artificial chaperones." These chaperones all possess exposed hydrophobic patches on their surface that act as recognition sites for misfolded proteins. They lack the complexity of chaperonins (that encapsulate proteins in their inner rings) and their study can offer insight into the minimal requirements for chaperone function. We use molecular dynamics simulations to investigate how a cageless chaperone, modeled as a sphere of tunable hydrophobicity, can assist folding of a substrate protein. We find that under steady-state (non-stress) conditions, cageless chaperones that bind to a single substrate protein increase folding yields by reducing the time the substrate spends in an aggregation-prone state in a dual manner: (a) by competing for aggregation-prone hydrophobic sites on the surface of a protein, hence reducing the time the protein spends unprotected in the bulk and (b) by accelerating folding rates of the protein. In both cases, the chaperone must bind to and hold the protein loosely enough to allow the protein to change its conformation and fold while bound. Loose binding may enable small cageless chaperones to help proteins fold and avoid aggregation under steady-state conditions, even at low concentrations, without the consumption of ATP.     

Chaperonins are cell-signalling proteins: the unfolding biology of molecular chaperones

The chaperonins are a subgroup of oligomeric molecular chaperones; the best-studied examples are chaperonin 60 (GroEL) and chaperonin 10 (GroES), both from the bacterium Escherichia coli. At the end of the 20th century, the paradigm of chaperonins as protein folders had emerged, but it is likely that during the 21st century these proteins will come to be viewed as intercellular signals. Indeed, it is possible that the chaperonins were among the first intercellular signalling proteins to evolve. During the past few years, it has emerged that chaperonin 10 and chaperonin 60 can be found on the surface of various prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, and can even be released from cells. Secreted chaperonins can interact with a variety of cell types, including leukocytes, vascular endothelial cells and epithelial cells, and activate key cellular activities such as the synthesis of cytokines and adhesion proteins. Much has been made of the high degree of sequence conservation among the chaperonins, particularly in terms of the immunogenicity of these proteins. However, different chaperonin 60 proteins can bind to different cell-surface receptors, including the Toll-like receptors, suggesting that this family of proteins cannot be treated as one biological entity and that several subfamilies may exist. Chaperonins have been implicated in human diseases on the basis of their immunogenicity. The finding that chaperonins can also induce tissue pathology suggests that they may play roles in infections and in idiopathic diseases such as atherosclerosis and arthritis.     

Giving protein traffic the green light

Most proteins that are secreted or expressed on a cell surface are synthesized on membrane polysomes and enter the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as unfolded polypeptide chains. A complex series of interactions with resident enzymes and molecular chaperones ensure that these proteins are folded and assembled to achieve their correct tertiary structures before being transported to the Golgi and along the secretory pathway. However, the mechanism by which properly folded molecules are sorted from incompletely or improperly folded proteins and from the resident proteins that guide this process remains unclear.     

Structural class prediction: an application of residue distribution along the sequence

Deciphering the native conformation of proteins from their amino acid sequences is one of the most challenging problems in molecular biology. Information on the secondary structure of a protein can be helpful in understanding its native folded state. In our earlier work on molecular chaperones, we have analyzed the hydrophobic and charged patches, short-, medium- and long-range contacts and residue distributions along the sequence. In this article, we have made an attempt to predict the structural class of globular and chaperone proteins based on the information obtained from residue distributions. This method predicts the structural class with an accuracy of 93 and 96%, respectively, for the four- and three-state models in a training set of 120 globular proteins, and 90 and 96%, respectively, for a test set of 80 proteins. We have used this information and methodology to predict the structural classes of chaperones. Interestingly most of the chaperone proteins are predicted under alpha/beta or mixed folding type.     

Designing a High Throughput Refolding Array Using a Combination of the GroEL Chaperonin and Osmolytes

Although GroE chaperonins and osmolytes had been used separately as protein folding aids, combining these two methods provides a considerable advantage for folding proteins that cannot fold with either osmolytes or chaperonins alone. This technique rapidly identifies superior folding solution conditions for a broad array of proteins that are difficult or impossible to fold by other methods. While testing the broad applicability of this technique, we have discovered that osmolytes greatly simplify the chaperonin reaction by eliminating the requirement for the co-chaperonin GroES which is normally involved in encapsulating folding proteins within the GroEL–GroES cavity. Therefore, combinations of soluble or immobilized GroEL, osmolytes and ATP or even ADP are sufficient to refold the test proteins. The first step in the chaperonin/osmolyte process is to form a stable long-lived chaperonin–substrate protein complex in the absence of nucleotide. In the second step, different osmolyte solutions are added along with nucleotides, thus forming a ‘folding array’ to identify superior folding conditions. The stable chaperonin–substrate protein complex can be concentrated or immobilized prior to osmolyte addition. This procedure prevents-off pathway aggregation during folding/refolding reactions and more importantly allows one to refold proteins at concentrations (~mg/ml) that are substantially higher than the critical aggregation concentration for given protein. This technique can be used for successful refolding of proteins from purified inclusion bodies. Recently, other investigators have used our chaperonin/osmolyte method to demonstrate that a mutant protein that misfolds in human disease can be rescued by GroEL/osmolyte system. Soluble or immobilized GroEL can be easily removed from the released folded protein using simple separation techniques. The method allows for isolation of folded monomeric or oligomeric proteins in quantities sufficient for X-ray crystallography or NMR structural determinations.     

Chaperone-assisted refolding of Escherichia coli maltodextrin glucosidase

In vitro refolding of maltodextrin glucosidase, a 69 kDa monomeric Escherichia coli protein, was studied in the presence of glycerol, dimethylsulfoxide, trimethylamine-N-oxide, ethylene glycol, trehalose, proline and chaperonins GroEL and GroES. Different osmolytes, namely proline, glycerol, trimethylamine-N-oxide and dimethylsulfoxide, also known as chemical chaperones, assist in protein folding through effective inhibition of the aggregation process. In the present study, it was observed that a few chemical chaperones effectively reduced the aggregation process of maltodextrin glucosidase and hence the in vitro refolding was substantially enhanced, with ethylene glycol being the exception. Although, the highest recovery of active maltodextrin glucosidase was achieved through the ATP-mediated GroEL/GroES-assisted refolding of denatured protein, the yield of correctly folded protein from glycerol- or proline-assisted spontaneous refolding process was closer to the chaperonin-assisted refolding. It was also observed that the combined application of chemical chaperones and molecular chaperone was more productive than their individual contribution towards the in vitro refolding of maltodextrin glucosidase. The chemical chaperones, except ethylene glycol, were found to provide different degrees of protection to maltodextrin glucosidase from thermal denaturation, whereas proline caused the highest protection. The observations from the present studies conclusively demonstrate that chemical or molecular chaperones, or the combination of both chaperones, could be used in the efficient refolding of recombinant E. coli maltodextrin glucosidase, which enhances the possibility of identifying or designing suitable small molecules that can act as chemical chaperones in the efficient refolding of various aggregate-prone proteins of commercial and medical importance.     

Protein folding in vivo: the importance of molecular chaperones

The contribution of the two major cytosolic chaperone systems, Hsp70 and the cylindrical chaperonins, to cellular protein folding has been clarified by a number of recent papers. These studies found that, in vivo, a significant fraction of newly synthesized polypeptides transit through these chaperone systems in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. The identification and characterization of the cellular substrates of chaperones will be instrumental in understanding how proteins fold in vivo.