Tissue specific trans-acting factor interaction with proximal rat prolactin gene promoter sequences.

Using an exonuclease III protection assay, strong, reversible and tissue-specific binding of GH3 cell nuclear factors to proximal regions of the rat prolactin (rPrl) promoter (-31 to -77) has been detected. A second less prominent region of factor binding, that may have a correlate in HeLa cell extracts, was detected in the region (-155 to -180). The binding is eliminated in the presence of excess unlabelled rPrl promoter sequences (-423 to +38), excess unlabelled distal rPrl 5'-flanking sequences (-1960 to -1260) and SV40-enhancer/promoter sequences; it is largely unaffected by growth hormone (rGH) promoter and RSV-LTR sequences. A plasmid containing the proximal rPrl promoter sequences (-75 to +38) was also shown to be an avid inhibitor, at low concentrations, of rPrl promoter driven chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene expression in transient cotransfection competition studies; under these assay conditions distal rPrl 5'-flanking sequences and RSV and rGH promoter plasmids do not compete. The results emphasize the critical importance of proximal rPrl promoter sequences for prolactin gene expression in GH3 cells but recognize the related functional potential of more distal sequences.     

The murine lymphotoxin gene promoter. Characterization and negative regulation

Murine lymphotoxin (LT; TNF-beta) gene upstream regulatory elements were identified by linking fragments of 5' DNA to the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase gene. Fragment LT1 (-293 to +77 in relation to the proximal cap site) exhibited promoter activity which drove CAT expression in transfected murine fibroblasts and T lymphomas. Primer extension analysis of endogenous LT message confirmed that LT1 contained the necessary elements required for promoter function. Promoter activity was not observed when LT2 (-662 to +77), LT3 (-1186 to +77), or LT3 delta AX (-1186 to +77 (delta-662/-269)) were ligated to the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase gene and transfected into fibroblasts or T lymphomas. At least one upstream repressor element is postulated to account for this promoter inhibition. In contrast to the results obtained with fibroblast and T cell transfectants, LT1 was inactive in the B cell transfectants A20 and P3X63. This suggests that some B cells express a repressor factor that inhibits the LT promoter and/or they lack the necessary positive regulatory factors.     

Increased level of prolactin gene sequences in bromodeoxyuridine treated GH cells.

The 5-bromodeoxyuridine-resistant (BrdUrdr) derivative (F1BGH12C1) of prolactin nonproducing (PRL-) rat pituitary tumor cell-subclone GH12C1, synthesize prolactin (PRL) in the presence of the drug. Analysis of nuclear RNA isolated from BrdUrd treated F1BHG12C1 cells demonstrated several high molecular weight RNA PRL sequences, similar to those observed in the nuclear RNA fraction of PRL producing (PRL+) GH3 cells. No such RNAPRL sequences could be detected in nuclear RNA fraction of untreated F1 BGH12C1 cells. PRL sequences in the genome of GH3 (PRL+), GH12C1 (PRL-) and F1BGH12C1 (PRL-, BrdUrdr) GH cells could be identified by blot analysis in 4.8-5.2kb fragment of restriction endonuclease, Hind III digested DNA. Both PRL+ and PRL- cells seem to have approximately the same level of PRL gene sequences in total cell DNA. However Hind III digested DNA of BrdUrd treated F1BGH12C cells revealed the presence of significantly higher levels of PRL gene sequences, in comparison, to that observed in total DNA of untreated cells. The increased level of PRL gene sequences was dependent on the period of drug treatment and a parallel increase in the cytoplasmic RNAPRL sequences was also observed.     

Phylogenetic specificity of prolactin gene expression with conservation of Pit-1 function.

In mammals, the pituitary POU homeodomain protein, Pit-1, binds to proximal and distal 5'-flanking sequences of the PRL gene that dictate tissue-specific expression. These DNA sequences are highly conserved among mammals but are dramatically different from PRL 5' sequences in the teleost species, Oncorhynchus tschawytscha (chinook salmon). To analyze the molecular basis for pituitary-specific gene expression in a distantly related vertebrate, we transfected CAT reporter gene constructs containing 2.4 kilobases (kb) 5'-flanking sequence from the salmon PRL (sPRL) gene into various cell types. Expression of the sPRL gene was restricted to pituitary cells, but in rat pituitary GH4 cells levels of expression were at least 90-fold lower than those obtained with a -3 kb rat PRL (rPRL) construct. Conversely, in primary teleost pituitary cells, -2.4 kb sPRL/CAT was expressed at levels about 10-fold higher than -3 kb rPRL/CAT. To determine whether species-specific transactivation by Pit-1 was sufficient to explain these species differences in PRL gene expression, we isolated a cDNA clone encoding the salmon Pit-1 POU domain and constructed a rat Pit-1 expression vector that contained salmon Pit-1 POU domain sequences substituted in frame. The chimeric Pit-1 encoded 14 amino acids unique to salmon. Coexpression of rat Pit-1 with salmon or rat PRL/CAT in transfected HeLa cells resulted in specific and strikingly comparable levels of promoter activation. Moreover, the specificity and efficacy of the chimeric salmon/rat Pit-1 was similar to wild type rat Pit-1 in activating salmon and rat PRL/CAT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Aminoglycoside suppression at UAG, UAA and UGA codons in Escherichia coli and human tissue culture cells

Summary We have compared the suppression of nonsense mutations by aminoglycoside antibiotics inEscherichia coli and in human 293 cells. Six nonsense alleles of the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (cat) gene, in the vector pRSVcat, were suppressed by growth in G418 and paromomycin. Readthrough at UAG, UAA and UGA codons was monitored with enzyme assays for chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT), in stably transformed bacteria and during transient expression from the same plasmid in human 293 tissue culture cells. We have found significant differences in the degree of suppression amongst three UAG codons and two UAA codons in different mRNA contexts. However, the pattern of these effects are not the same in the two organisms. Our data suggest that context effects of nonsense suppression may operate under different rules inE. coli and human cells.