Evolution of eye development in arthropods: phylogenetic aspects

The architecture of the adult arthropod visual system for many decades has contributed important character sets that are useful for reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships within this group. In the current paper we explore whether aspects of eye development can also contribute new arguments to the discussion of arthropod phylogeny. We review the current knowledge on eye formation in Trilobita, Xiphosura, Myriapoda, Hexapoda, and Crustacea. All euarthropod taxa share the motif of a proliferation zone at the side of the developing eye field that contributes new eye elements. Two major variations of this common motif can be distinguished: 1. The “row by row type” of Trilobita, Xiphosura, and Diplopoda. In this type, the proliferation zone at the side of the eye field generates new single, large elements with a high and variable cell number, which are added to the side of the eye and extend rows of existing eye elements. Cell proliferation, differentiation and ommatidial assembly seem to be separated in time but spatially confined within the precursors of the optic units which grow continuously once they are formed (intercalary growth). 2. The “morphogenetic front type” of eye formation in Crustacea + Hexapoda (Tetraconata). In this type, there is a clear temporal and spatial separation of the formation and differentiation processes. Proliferation and the initial steps of pattern formation take place in linear and parallel mitotic and morphogenetic fronts (the mitotic waves and the morphogenetic furrow/transition zone) and numerous but small new elements with a strictly fixed set of cells are added to the eye field. In Tetraconata, once formed, the individual ommatidia do not grow any more. Scutigeromorph chilopods take an intermediate position between these two major types. We suggest that the “row by row type” as seen in Trilobita, Xiphosura and Diplopoda represents the plesiomorphic developmental mode of eye formation from the euarthropod ground pattern whereas the “morphogenetic front type” is apomorphic for the Tetraconata. Our data are discussed with regard to two competing hypotheses on arthropod phylogeny, the “Tracheata” versus “Tetraconata” concept. The modes of eye development in Myriapoda is more parsimonious to explain in the Tetraconata hypothesis so that our data raise the possibility that myriapod eyes may not be secondarily reconstructed insect eyes as the prevailing hypothesis suggests.     

The EGF receptor and notch signaling pathways control the initiation of the morphogenetic furrow during Drosophila eye development

The onset of pattern formation in the developing Drosophila retina begins with the initiation of the morphogenetic furrow, the leading edge of a wave of retinal development that transforms a uniform epithelium, the eye imaginal disc into a near crystalline array of ommatidial elements. The initiation of this wave of morphogenesis is under the control of the secreted morphogens Hedgehog (Hh), Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Wingless (Wg). We show that the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Notch signaling cascades are crucial components that are also required to initiate retinal development. We also show that the initiation of the morphogenetic furrow is the sum of two genetically separable processes: (1) the 'birth' of pattern formation at the posterior margin of the eye imaginal disc; and (2) the subsequent 'reincarnation' of retinal development across the epithelium.     

Development of the Drosophila retina,a neurocrystalline lattice

Pattern formation in the Drosophila retina proceeds by the recruitment of cells, along a morphogenetic front, into a lattice. At the advancing front, marked by a dorso-ventral furrow in the eye imaginal disc, cells are organized into ommatidial precursors, each containing cells destined to become photoreceptors 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8. Behind the front, a mitotic wave produces photoreceptors 1, 6, and 7, plus the remaining cells needed to complete the ommatidia. During the third larval instar, the front sweeps anteriorly across the eye disc, leaving a highly ordered pattern in its wake. Preceding the dorso-ventral furrow is a groove that bisects the eye disc into dorsal and ventral halves and presumably plays a role in establishing the equatorial symmetry line. Cell lineage plays little role in pattern formation in the eye. Genetic mosaics show that the cells of each ommatidium are not derived from a single mother cell; the cells appear to be recruited at random at the morphogenetic front. Similarly, the mirror symmetry above and below the equator is not established by a clonal mechanism; a single clone can contribute cells to ommatidia on both sides of the equator.     

Homeobox genes in the genetic control of eye development

Vertebrate eye formation is a complex process which involves early specification of the prospective eye territory, induction events, patterning along the polarity axes and regional specification, to bring about the proper morphogenetic movements, cell proliferation, cell differentiation and neural connections allowing visual function. The molecular machinery underlying such complex developmental events is presently under an intense research scrutiny and many associated genetic factors have been isolated and characterized. These studies produced striking knowledge in the field, especially with respect to uncovering the role of key genes and their possible evolutionary conservation. Presently, a major task is to define the complex interactions connecting the multiplicity of molecular players that regulate eye development. We recently identified two homeobox genes, Xrx1 and Xvax2, and studied their function by using the Xenopus embryo as a developmental model system. Xrx1 and Xvax2 control key aspects of eye development. In particular, Xrx1 appears to play a role in the early specification of anterior neural regions fated to give rise to retina and forebrain structures, and in promoting cell proliferation within these territories. On the other hand, Xvax2 is involved in regulating the eye proximo-distal and/or dorsoventral polarity, and the morphogenetic movements taking place during formation of the optic stalk and cup. Here we review the experimental results addressing the roles of Xrx1 and Xvax2 and their vertebrate orthologues, and discuss their relationship with other molecules also playing a related function in eye development.     

homothorax and iroquois-C genes are required for the establishment of territories within the developing eye disc

In Drosophila the eye-antennal disc gives rise to most adult structures of the fly's head. Yet the molecular basis for its regionalization during development is poorly understood. Here we show that homothorax is required early during development for normal eye development and is necessary for the formation of the ventral head capsule. In the ventral region of the disc only, homothorax and wingless are involved in a positive feedback loop necessary to restrict eye formation. homothorax is able to prevent the initiation and progression of the morphogenetic furrow without inducing wingless, which points to homothorax as a key negative regulator of eye development. In addition, we show that the iroquois-complex genes are required for dorsal head development antagonizing the function of homothorax in this region of the disc.     

Ellipse mutations in the Drosophila homologue of the EGF receptor affect pattern formation, cell division, and cell death in eye imaginal discs.

Ellipse alleles are mutations of the EGF-receptor homologue that reduce the number of ommatidia in the eye imaginal disc. Cobalt sulfide staining, expression of hairy and scabrous proteins, and mosaic analysis indicated that Elp mutations affect ommatidial precluster formation in the morphogenetic furrow. BrdU incorporation studies suggest that cells diverted from precluster formation instead enter S-phase after the morphogenetic furrow. Genetic studies suggest that the DER has multiple functions during eye development and that several recessive hypomorphic alleles affect another aspect of DER function that is required after precluster formation. Elp mutations show genetic interactions with the neurogenic mutations Notch and Delta. The small number of ommatidia that differentiate in Elp/Elp are separated more than in wildtype and have been studied to investigate what aspects of ommatidium development are intrinsic to the ommatidium itself. It appears that each developing ommatidium cues the determination of photoreceptors, cone cells, and primary pigment cells, but that the secondary and tertiary pigment cells, and the mechanosensory bristles, can form independently. The normal rotation of ommatidia in the dorsal-ventral axis does not require the presence of the ommatidial array. A short-range signal from a nearby ommatidium is important for mitosis. Cells not close to an ommatidium do not go through mitosis and many die.     

Early stages of zebrafish eye formation require the coordinated activity of Wnt11, Fz5, and the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway

During regional patterning of the anterior neural plate, a medially positioned domain of cells is specified to adopt retinal identity. These eye field cells remain coherent as they undergo morphogenetic events distinct from other prospective forebrain domains. We show that two branches of the Wnt signaling pathway coordinate cell fate determination with cell behavior during eye field formation. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling antagonizes eye specification through the activity of Wnt8b and Fz8a. In contrast, Wnt11 and Fz5 promote eye field development, at least in part, through local antagonism of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Additionally, Wnt11 regulates the behavior of eye field cells, promoting their cohesion. Together, these results allow us to postulate a model in which Wnt11 and Fz5 signaling promotes early eye development through the coordinated antagonism of signals that suppress retinal identity and promotion of coherence of eye field cells.     

In vivo analysis of hyaloid vasculature morphogenesis in zebrafish: A role for the lens in maturation and maintenance of the hyaloid

Two vascular networks nourish the embryonic eye as it develops – the hyaloid vasculature, located at the anterior of the eye between the retina and lens, and the choroidal vasculature, located at the posterior of the eye, surrounding the optic cup. Little is known about hyaloid development and morphogenesis, however. To begin to identify the morphogenetic underpinnings of hyaloid formation, we utilized in vivo time-lapse confocal imaging to characterize morphogenesis of the zebrafish hyaloid through 5 days post fertilization (dpf). Our data segregate hyaloid formation into three distinct morphogenetic stages: Stage I: arrival of hyaloid cells at the lens and formation of the hyaloid loop; Stage II: formation of a branched hyaloid network; Stage III: refinement of the hyaloid network. Utilizing fixed and dissected tissues, distinct Stage II and Stage III aspects of hyaloid formation were quantified over time. Combining in vivo imaging with microangiography, we demonstrate that the hyaloid system becomes fully enclosed by 5 dpf. To begin to identify the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying hyaloid morphogenesis, we identified a recessive mutation in the mab21l2 gene, and in a subset of mab21l2 mutants the lens does not form. Utilizing these “lens-less” mutants, we determined whether the lens was required for hyaloid morphogenesis. Our data demonstrate that the lens is not required for Stage I of hyaloid formation; however, Stages II and III of hyaloid formation are disrupted in the absence of a lens, supporting a role for the lens in hyaloid maturation and maintenance. Taken together, this study provides a foundation on which the cellular, molecular and embryologic mechanisms underlying hyaloid morphogenesis can be elucidated.     

Cell cycle arrest by a gradient of Dpp signaling during Drosophila eye development

Background  

The secreted morphogen Dpp plays important roles in spatial regulation of gene expression and cell cycle progression in the developing Drosophila eye. Dpp signaling is required for timely cell cycle arrest ahead of the morphogenetic furrow as a prelude to differentiation, and is also important for eye disc growth. The dpp gene is expressed at multiple locations in the eye imaginal disc, including the morphogenetic furrow that sweeps across the eye disc as differentiation initiates.     

Hedgehog and Dpp signaling induce cadherin Cad86C expression in the morphogenetic furrow during Drosophila eye development

During Drosophila eye development, cell differentiation is preceded by the formation of a morphogenetic furrow, which progresses across the epithelium from posterior to anterior. Cells within the morphogenetic furrow are apically constricted and shortened along their apical-basal axis. However, how these cell shape changes and, thus, the progression of the morphogenetic furrow are controlled is not well understood. Here we show that cells simultaneously lacking Hedgehog and Dpp signal transduction fail to shorten and do not enter the morphogenetic furrow. Moreover, we have identified a gene, cadherin Cad86C, which is highly expressed in cells of the leading flank of the morphogenetic furrow. Ectopic activation of either the Hedgehog or Dpp signal transduction pathway results in elevated Cad86C expression. Conversely, simultaneous loss of both Hedgehog and Dpp signal transduction leads to decreased Cad86C expression. Finally, ectopic expression of Cad86C in either eye-antennal imaginal discs or wing imaginal discs results in apical constriction and shortening of cells. We conclude that Hedgehog and Dpp signaling promote the shortening of cells within the morphogenetic furrow. Induction of Cad86C expression might be one mechanism through which Hedgehog and Dpp promote these cell shape changes.     

Pattern formation in the absence of cell proliferation: tissue-specific regulation of cell cycle progression by string (stg) during Drosophila eye development.

During Drosophila eye development, the posterior-to-anterior movement of the morphogenetic furrow coordinates cell cycle progression with the early events of pattern formation. The cdc25 phosphatase string (stg) has been proposed to contribute to the synchronization of retinal precursors anterior to the furrow by driving cells in G(2) through mitosis and into a subsequent G(1). Genetic and molecular analysis of Drop (Dr) mutations suggests that they represent novel cis-regulatory alleles of stg that inactivate expression in eye. Retinal precursors anterior to the furrow lacking stg arrest in G(2) and fail to enter mitosis, while cells within the furrow accumulate high levels of cyclins A and B. Although G(2)-arrested cells initiate normal pattern formation, the absence of stg results in retinal patterning defects due to the recruitment of extra photoreceptor cells. These results demonstrate a requirement for stg in cell cycle regulation and cell fate determination during eye development.     

Mechanism of induction ofBar-like eye malformation by transient overexpression ofBar homeobox genes inDrosophila melanogaster

TheBar locus ofDrosophila is known to be a small complex consisting of two similar homeobox genes,BarH1 andBarH2. Usingegr as an ommatidium marker, possible mechanisms of formation of malformed eyes were examined. As in the case ofBarH1, overexpression ofBarH2 was found to be capable of inducingBar-like eye malformation. It was suggested that suppression of the anterior progression of the morphogenetic furrow and inhibition of reinitiation of normal ommatidial differentiation were mandatory to formation of the reduced eye morphology inBar mutants. These authors equally contributed to the present paper.     

Expression patterns of dachshund during head development of Gryllus bimaculatus (cricket)

We report that Gryllus bimaculatus dachshund (Gbdac), a cricket homologue of Drosophila dachshund (Dmdac), is expressed in the developing eye and brain. During brain development, Gbdac was first expressed in the medial head region, corresponding to a part of developing protocephalic region, and expressed in the primordial and adult Kenyon cells. During eye development, Gbdac was first expressed in the lateral head region, becoming to the eye primordium and a part of the deutocerebrum. Then, Gbdac was expressed in the posterior region of the eye primordium, prior to the formation of compound eyes. The expression domain shifted to the anterior domain concomitantly with the movement of morphogenetic furrows. Gbdac was also expressed in the developing optic lobes during differentiation of the retina. These expression patterns were compared with those of Dmdac. We found that although developmental processes of the Gryllus eye and brain differ from those of the Drosophila ones, the expression patterns of Gbdac are essentially similar to those of the Dmdac.     

The development and functioning of embryonic pancreatic islet cells in the anterior chamber of rats

In the present study the morphogenesis and differentiation processes in embryonic pancreatic gland implants into Wistar line rat anterior eye chamber have been investigated. The conditions therein were found to be favourable for the endocrine tissue functioning; a number of morphogenetic changes resulting in the formation of islet structure acting as a morphophysiological unit were noted as well. Endocrine cells possess some selective properties as compared to the exocrine tissue. Alloxan diabetic animals demonstrated the most optimum conditions for the endocrine cells development and functioning.     

Wingless blocks bristle formation and morphogenetic furrow progression in the eye through repression of Daughterless

In the developing eye, wingless activity represses proneural gene expression (and thus interommatidial bristle formation) and positions the morphogenetic furrow by blocking its initiation in the dorsal and ventral regions of the presumptive eye. We provide evidence that wingless mediates both effects, at least in part, through repression of the basic helix-loop-helix protein Daughterless. daughterless is required for high proneural gene expression and furrow progression. Ectopic expression of wingless blocks Daughterless expression in the proneural clusters. This repression, and that of furrow progression, can be mimicked by an activated form of armadillo and blocked by a dominant negative form of pangolin/TCF. Placing daughterless under the control of a heterologous promoter blocks the ability of ectopic wingless to inhibit bristle formation and furrow progression. hedgehog and decapentapleigic could not rescue the wingless furrow progression block, indicating that wingless acts downstream of these genes. In contrast, Atonal and Scute, which are thought to heterodimerize with Daughterless to promote furrow progression and bristle formation, respectively, can block ectopic wingless action. These results are summarized in a model where daughterless is a major, but probably not the only, target of wingless action in the eye.     

Retinoic acid guides eye morphogenetic movements via paracrine signaling but is unnecessary for retinal dorsoventral patterning

Retinoic acid (RA) is required for patterning of the posterior nervous system, but its role in the retina remains unclear. RA is synthesized in discrete regions of the embryonic eye by three retinaldehyde dehydrogenases (RALDHs) displaying distinct expression patterns. Overlapping functions of these enzymes have hampered genetic efforts to elucidate RA function in the eye. Here, we report Raldh1, Raldh2 and Raldh3 single, double and triple null mice exhibiting progressively less or no RA synthesis in the eye. Our genetic studies indicate that RA signaling is not required for the establishment or maintenance of dorsoventral patterning in the retina, as we observe normal expression of Tbx5 and ephrin B2 (Efnb2) dorsally, plus Vax2 and Ephb2 ventrally. Instead, RA is required for the morphogenetic movements needed to shape the developing retina and surrounding mesenchyme. At early stages, Raldh2 expressed in mesenchyme and Raldh3 expressed in the retinal pigmented epithelium generate RA that delivers an essential signal to the neural retina required for morphogenetic movements that lead to ventral invagination of the optic cup. At later stages, Raldh1 expressed in dorsal neural retina and Raldh3 expressed in ventral neural retina (plus weaker expression of each in lens/corneal ectoderm) generates RA that travels to surrounding mesenchyme, where it is needed to limit the anterior invasion of perioptic mesenchyme during the formation of corneal mesenchyme and eyelids. At all stages, RA target tissues are distinct from locations of RA synthesis, indicating that RALDHs function cell-nonautonomously to generate paracrine RA signals that guide morphogenetic movements in neighboring cells.