Three-dimensional structure of a single filament in the Limulus acrosomal bundle: scruin binds to homologous helix-loop-beta motifs in actin

Frozen, hydrated acrosomal bundles from Limulus sperm were imaged with a 400 kV electron cryomicroscope. Segments of this long bundle can be studied as a P1 crystal with a unit cell containing an acrosomal filament with 28 actin and 28 scruin molecules in 13 helical turns. A novel computational procedure was developed to extract single columns of superimposed acrosomal filaments from the distinctive crystallographic view. Helical reconstruction was used to generate a three-dimensional structure of this computationally isolated acrosomal filament. The scruin molecule is organized into two domains which contact two actin subunits in different strands of the same actin filament. A correlation of Holmes' actin filament model to the density in our acrosomal filament map shows that actin subdomains 1, 2, and 3 match the model density closely. However, actin subdomain 4 matches rather poorly, suggesting that interactions with scruin may have altered actin conformation. Scruin makes extensive interactions with helix-loop-beta motifs in subdomain 3 of one actin subunit and in subdomain 1 of a consecutive actin subunit along the genetic filament helix. These two actin subdomains are structurally homologous and are closely spaced along the actin filament. Our model suggests that scruin, which is derived from a tandemly duplicated gene, has evolved to bind structurally homologous but non-identical positions across two consecutive actin subunits.     

Sequence and domain organization of scruin, an actin-cross-linking protein in the acrosomal process of Limulus sperm

The acrosomal process of Limulus sperm is an 80-microns long finger of membrane supported by a crystalline bundle of actin filaments. The filaments in this bundle are crosslinked by a 102-kD protein, scruin present in a 1:1 molar ratio with actin. Recent image reconstruction of scruin decorated actin filaments at 13-A resolution shows that scruin is organized into two equally sized domains bound to separate actin subunits in the same filament. We have cloned and sequenced the gene for scruin from a Limulus testes cDNA library. The deduced amino acid sequence of scruin reflects the domain organization of scruin: it consists of a tandem pair of homologous domains joined by a linker region. The domain organization of scruin is confirmed by limited proteolysis of the purified acrosomal process. Three different proteases cleave the native protein in a 5-kD Protease-sensitive region in the middle of the molecule to generate an NH2-terminal 47-kD and a COOH-terminal 56-kD protease-resistant domains. Although the protein sequence of scruin has no homology to any known actin-binding protein, it has similarities to several proteins, including four open reading frames of unknown function in poxviruses, as well as kelch, a Drosophila protein localized to actin-rich ring canals. All proteins that show homologies to scruin are characterized by the presence of an approximately 50-amino acid residue motif that is repeated between two and seven times. Crystallographic studies reveal this motif represents a four beta-stranded fold that is characteristic of the "superbarrel" structural fold found in the sialidase family of proteins. These results suggest that the two domains of scruin seen in EM reconstructions are superbarrel folds, and they present the possibility that other members of this family may also bind actin.     

The three-dimensional structure of the Limulus acrosomal process: a dynamic actin bundle.

Limulus sperm contains a dynamic macromolecular structure that rapidly extends a 50 microm process called the true discharge. The core of this structure is a bundle of ordered filaments composed of a complex of actin, scruin and calmodulin. We determined its structure by electron crystallographic reconstruction. The three-dimensional map reveals an actin-scruin helix that is azimuthally modulated by the influence of the interactions of a filament with its neighbors. There are a variety of density connections with neighboring filaments involving scruin. Scruin commonly contacts one neighbor, but we observe up to three interfilament connections involving both domains of the 28 scruin molecules in the unit cell. Our structure indicates that promiscuous scruin-scruin contacts are the major determinants of bundle stability in the true discharge. It also suggests that rearrangements would be permitted, which can facilitate the transition from the coiled to the true discharge form.     

Cofilin Changes the Twist of F-Actin: Implications for Actin Filament Dynamics and Cellular Function

Cofilin is an actin depolymerizing protein found widely distributed in animals and plants. We have used electron cryomicroscopy and helical reconstruction to identify its binding site on actin filaments. Cofilin binds filamentous (F)-actin cooperatively by bridging two longitudinally associated actin subunits. The binding site is centered axially at subdomain 2 of the lower actin subunit and radially at the cleft between subdomains 1 and 3 of the upper actin subunit. Our work has revealed a totally unexpected (and unique) property of cofilin, namely, its ability to change filament twist. As a consequence of this change in twist, filaments decorated with cofilin have much shorter ‘actin crossovers' (~75% of those normally observed in F-actin structures). Although their binding sites are distinct, cofilin and phalloidin do not bind simultaneously to F-actin. This is the first demonstration of a protein that excludes another actin-binding molecule by changing filament twist. Alteration of F-actin structure by cofilin/ADF appears to be a novel mechanism through which the actin cytoskeleton may be regulated or remodeled.     

Azadirachtin(A) distinctively modulates subdomain 2 of actin – novel mechanism to induce depolymerization revealed by molecular dynamics study

Azadirachtin(A) (AZA), a potential insecticide from neem, binds to actin and induces depolymerization in Drosophila. AZA binds to the pocket same as that of Latrunculin A (LAT), but LAT inhibits actin polymerization by stiffening the actin structure and affects the ADP–ATP exchange. The mechanism by which AZA induces actin depolymerization is not clearly understood. Therefore, different computational experiments were conducted to delineate the precise mechanism of AZA-induced actin depolymerization. Molecular dynamics studies showed that AZA strongly interacted with subdomain 2 and destabilized the interactions between subdomain 2 of one actin and subdomains 1 and 4 of the adjacent actin, causing the separation of actin subunits. The separation was observed between subdomain 3 of subunit n and subdomain 4 of subunit n + 2. However, the specific triggering point for the separation of the subunits was the destabilization of direct interactions between subdomain 2 of subunit n (Arg39, Val45, Gly46 and Arg62) and subdomain 4 of subunit n + 2 (Asp286, Ile287, Asp288, Ile289, Asp244 and Lys291). These results reveal a unique mechanism of an actin filament modulator that induces depolymerization. This mechanism of AZA can be used to design similar molecules against mammalian actins for cancer therapy.     

Conformational analysis of human serum albumin and its non-enzymatic glycation products using monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were prepared to analyse the conformation of human serum albumin (HSA) and its non-enzymatic glycation (NEG) products. We first determined the epitopes of the mAbs using HSA subdomains expressed on the surface of yeast. Each mAb was classified as belonging to one of two groups; Type I mAbs which recognized a single subdomain structure and Type II mAbs which bound to plural subdomains. We analysed the pH-dependent conformational change in HSA. We found that one Type II mAb, HAy2, detected the normal to base form (N-B) transition while the other did not, suggesting that N-B transition occurred around Domain I accompanied by topological isomerization of subdomains without changing the subdomain structure itself. Next, we analysed the conformations of the NEG products. Since all mAbs reacted with the early NEG products, no structural change was thought to have occurred in the early NEG products. On the other hand, only a Type I mAb, HAy1, had full binding activity with the advanced glycation end products (AGE) while the other mAbs had lost or had diminished activity, suggesting that the over-all tertiary structure of HSA was altered except for a subdomain, sDOM Ia, in AGE.     

Bending stiffness of a crystalline actin bundle

The acrosomal process of the sperm of the horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) is a unique crystalline actin bundle, consisting of multiple actin filaments cross-linked by the actin-bundling protein, scruin. For successful fertilization, the acrosomal bundle must penetrate through a 30 microm thick jelly coat surrounding the egg and thus it must be sufficiently stiff. Here, we present two measurements of the bending stiffness of a single crystalline bundle of actin. Results from these measurements indicate that the actin:scruin composite bundle has an average elastic modulus of 2 GPa, which is similar to that of a single actin filament, and a bending stiffness that is more than two orders of magnitude larger than that of a bundle of uncross-linked actin filaments due to stiffening by the scruin matrix.     

A point mutation in the cargo-binding domain of myosin V affects its interaction with multiple cargoes

Class V myosins move diverse intracellular cargoes, which attach via interaction of cargo-specific proteins to the myosin V globular tail. The globular tail of the yeast myosin V, Myo2p, contains two structural and functional subdomains. Subdomain I binds to the vacuole-specific protein, Vac17p, while subdomain II likely binds to an as yet unidentified secretory vesicle-specific protein. All functions of Myo2p require the tight association of subdomains I and II, which suggests that binding of a cargo to one subdomain may inhibit cargo-binding to a second subdomain. Thus, two types of mutations are predicted to specifically affect a subset of Myo2p cargoes: first are mutations within a cargo-specific binding region; second are mutations that mimic the inhibited conformation of one of the subdomains. Here we analyze a point mutation in subdomain I, myo2-2(G1248D), which is likely to be this latter type of mutation. myo2-2 has no effect on secretory vesicle movement. The secretory vesicle binding site is in subdomain II. However, myo2-2 is impaired in several Myo2p-related functions. While subdomains I and II of myo2-2p tightly associate, there are measurable differences in the conformation of its globular tail. Based solely on the ability to restore vacuole inheritance, a set of intragenic suppressors of myo2-2 were identified. All suppressor mutations reside in subdomain I. Moreover, subdomain I and II interactions occurred in all suppressors, demonstrating the importance of subdomain I and II association for Myo2p function. Furthermore, 3 of the 10 suppressors globally restored all tested defects in myo2-2. This large proportion of global suppressors strongly suggests that myo2-2(G1248) causes a conformational change in subdomain I that simultaneously affects multiple cargoes.     

The structural basis for the intrinsic disorder of the actin filament: the "lateral slipping" model

Three-dimensional (3-D) helical reconstructions computed from electron micrographs of negatively stained dispersed F-actin filaments invariably revealed two uninterrupted columns of mass forming the "backbone" of the double-helical filament. The contact between neighboring subunits along the thus defined two long-pitch helical strands was spatially conserved and of high mass density, while the intersubunit contact between them was of lower mass density and varied among reconstructions. In contrast, phalloidinstabilized F-actin filaments displayed higher and spatially more conserved mass density between the two long-pitch helical strands, suggesting that this bicyclic hepta-peptide toxin strengthens the intersubunit contact between the two strands. Consistent with this distinct intersubunit bonding pattern, the two long-pitch helical strands of unstabilized filaments were sometimes observed separated from each other over a distance of two to six subunits, suggesting that the intrastrand intersubunit contact is also physically stronger than the interstrand contact. The resolution of the filament reconstructions, extending to 2.5 nm axially and radially, enabled us to reproducibly "cut out" the F-actin subunit which measured 5.5 nm axially by 6.0 nm tangentially by 3.2 nm radially. The subunit is distinctly polar with a massive "base" pointing towards the "barbed" end of the filament, and a slender "tip" defining its "pointed" end (i.e., relative to the "arrowhead" pattern revealed after stoichiometric decoration of the filaments with myosin subfragment 1). Concavities running approximately parallel to the filament axis both on the inner and outer face of the subunit define a distinct cleft separating the subunit into two domains of similar size: an inner domain confined to radii less than or equal to 2.5-nm forms the uninterrupted backbone of the two long-pitch helical strands, and an outer domain placed at radii of 2-5-nm protrudes radially and thus predominantly contributes to the outer part of the massive base. Quantitative evaluation of successive crossover spacings along individual F-actin filaments revealed the deviations from the mean repeat to be compensatory, i.e., short crossovers frequently followed long ones and vice versa. The variable crossover spacings and diameter of the F-actin filament together with the local unraveling of the two long-pitch helical strands are explained in terms of varying amounts of compensatory "lateral slipping" of the two strands past each other roughly perpendicular to the filament axis. This intrinsic disorder of the actin filament may enable the actin moiety to play a more active role in actin-myosin-based force generation than merely act as a rigid passive cable as has hitherto been assumed.     

Protein concerted motions in the DNA-human topoisomerase I complex

The collective motions of the core and C-terminal domains of human topoisomerase I (topo I) have been analysed by molecular dynamics simulation of the protein in covalent complex with a 22 bp DNA duplex. The analysis evidenced a great number of correlated movements of core subdomain I and II residues, and a central role for helix 5 in the protein–DNA communication, in particular with the scissile strand downstream of the cleavage site. The flow of information between these core subdomains and DNA suggests that subdomains I and II play an essential role in the DNA relaxation process. In core subdomain III the majority of DNA contacting residues do not communicate with protein regions far from DNA, suggesting that they have a structural role. However, selected core subdomain III residues, involved in the orientation of the active site region, show correlated movements with residues distant from DNA, indicating that the information concerning the catalytic event is also transmitted. The flexibility of two loops formed by residues 519–520 and 580–584 seems indispensable to the dynamic participation of core subdomain III to the DNA cleavage and religation steps. The motion of specific residues has also been found to explain the effect of single point mutations that make topo I resistant to the anticancer drug camptothecin.     

Structure and dynamics of the actin filament

The structures of filamentous Mg-ATP-actin (F actin) in the presence and absence of KCl have been mapped with hydroxyl radicals (*OH) generated by synchrotron X-ray radiolysis. Proteolysis and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis revealed 52 reactive side-chain sites from 27 distinct peptides within actin. The reactivities of these probe sites with *OH in the F-actin states are compared with those of Mg-ATP-G-actin (monomers) analyzed previously [Guan, J.-Q. et al. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 11992-12000]. Filament-dependent protection within subdomains 2, 3, and 4 and at the C terminus is consistent with longitudinal contacts of monomers within the filament helical structure as predicted by the Holmes model. In the absence of KCl, the extent of filament-dependent protection rarely reached 3-fold, consistent with a highly dynamic filament characterized by relatively weak interactions between actin protomers. However, in the presence of KCl, the extents of protection are significantly increased, consistent with a well-ordered, more tightly packed filament structure. Filament-dependent enhancements of reactivity not predicted by the Holmes model are seen for a peptide that overlaps the "hydrophobic plug" (H-plug) region and for a peptide that forms contacts with the polyphosphate moiety of the bound nucleotide. Overall, these data are both consistent with and complementary to a recent deuterium-exchange MS study of filamentous actin [Chik, J. K., and Schriemer, D.C. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 334, 373-385], which also did not detect any burial of the H plug upon formation of filaments.     

Modeled structure of the 75-kDa neurotrophin receptor.

Motifs in ligand-binding domains of the neurotrophin (NTR) and lymphotoxin (TNFR-I) receptors define a family of receptors that mediates programmed cell death. We have explored relationships of architecture and function in this family through a molecular model of NTR, also called p75NGFR or LANR. Modeling by homology took advantage of four modular subdomains in the crystal structure of TNFR-I that also occur in NTR. Hypothetical complexes between the model and a ligand structure (for nerve growth factor, NGF) were then examined using docking software. NTR appears to bind in the dimer interface of NGF, making two sets of contacts. NTR subdomains III and IV provide the ligand-contact surfaces, in contrast to TNFR, in which subdomains II and III contact TNF-beta. NTR subdomain II appears to have been evolutionarily modified, potentially contributing to an interface between receptor subunits. These and other specific predictions of the model will require experimental confirmation.     

Crystal structures of monomeric actin bound to cytochalasin D

The fungal toxin cytochalasin D (CD) interferes with the normal dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton by binding to the barbed end of actin filaments. Despite its widespread use as a tool for studying actin-mediated processes, the exact location and nature of its binding to actin have not been previously determined. Here we describe two crystal structures of an expressed monomeric actin in complex with CD: one obtained by soaking preformed actin crystals with CD, and the other obtained by cocrystallization. The binding site for CD, in the hydrophobic cleft between actin subdomains 1 and 3, is the same in the two structures. Polar and hydrophobic contacts play equally important roles in CD binding, and six hydrogen bonds stabilize the actin-CD complex. Many unrelated actin-binding proteins and marine toxins target this cleft and the hydrophobic pocket at the front end of the cleft (viewing actin with subdomain 2 in the upper right corner). CD differs in that it binds to the back half of the cleft. The ability of CD to induce actin dimer formation and actin-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis may be related to its unique binding site and the necessity to fit its bulky macrocycle into this cleft. Contacts with residues lining this cleft appear to be crucial to capping and/or severing. The cocrystallized actin-CD structure also revealed changes in actin conformation. An ∼ 6° rotation of the smaller actin domain (subdomains 1 and 2) with respect to the larger domain (subdomains 3 and 4) results in small changes in crystal packing that allow the D-loop to adopt an extended loop structure instead of being disordered, as it is in most crystal structures of actin. We speculate that these changes represent a potential conformation that the actin monomer can adopt on the pathway to polymerization or in the filament.     

A model for the interaction of the G3‐subdomain of Geobacillus stearothermophilus IF2 with the 30S ribosomal subunit

Bacterial translation initiation factor IF2 complexed with GTP binds to the 30S ribosomal subunit, promotes ribosomal binding of fMet‐tRNA, and favors the joining of the small and large ribosomal subunits yielding a 70S initiation complex ready to enter the translation elongation phase. Within the IF2 molecule subdomain G3, which is believed to play an important role in the IF2‐30S interaction, is positioned between the GTP‐binding G2 and the fMet‐tRNA binding C‐terminal subdomains. In this study the solution structure of subdomain G3 of Geobacillus stearothermophilus IF2 has been elucidated. G3 forms a core structure consisting of two β‐sheets with each four anti‐parallel strands, followed by a C‐terminal α‐helix. In line with its role as linker between G3 and subdomain C1, this helix has no well‐defined orientation but is endowed with a dynamic nature. The structure of the G3 core is that of a typical OB‐fold module, similar to that of the corresponding subdomain of Thermus thermophilus IF2, and to that of other known RNA‐binding modules such as IF2‐C2, IF1 and subdomains II of elongation factors EF‐Tu and EF‐G. Structural comparisons have resulted in a model that describes the interaction between IF2‐G3 and the 30S ribosomal subunit.     

Structural basis for the slow dynamics of the actin filament pointed end

The actin filament has clear polarity where one end, the pointed end, has a much slower polymerization and depolymerization rate than the other end, the barbed end. This intrinsic difference of the ends significantly affects all actin dynamics in the cell, which has central roles in a wide spectrum of cellular functions. The detailed mechanism underlying this difference has remained elusive, because high-resolution structures of the filament ends have not been available. Here, we present the structure of the actin filament pointed end obtained using a single particle analysis of cryo-electron micrographs. We determined that the terminal pointed end subunit is tilted towards the penultimate subunit, allowing specific and extra loop-to-loop inter-strand contacts between the two end subunits, which is not possible in other parts of the filament. These specific contacts prevent the end subunit from dissociating. For elongation, the loop-to-loop contacts also inhibit the incorporation of another actin monomer at the pointed end. These observations are likely to account for the less dynamic pointed end.     

Chimeric myosin regulatory light chains identify the subdomain responsible for regulatory function.

Regulatory light chains, located on the 'motor' head domains of myosin, belong to the family of Ca2+ binding proteins that consist of four 'EF-hand' subdomains. Vertebrate regulatory light chains can be divided into two functional classes: (i) in smooth/non-muscle myosins, phosphorylation of the light chains by a calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase regulates both interaction of the myosin head with actin and assembly of the myosin into filaments, (ii) the light chains of skeletal muscle myosins are similarly phosphorylated, but they play no apparent role in regulation. To discover the basis for the difference in regulatory properties of these two classes of light chains, we have synthesized in Escherichia coli, chimeric mutants composed of subdomains derived from the regulatory light chains of chicken skeletal and smooth muscle myosins. The regulatory capability of these mutants was analysed by their ability to regulate molluscan myosin. Using this test system, we identified the third subdomain of the regulatory light chain as being responsible for controlling not only the actin-myosin interaction, but also myosin filament assembly.     

Evidence for a Conformational Change in Actin Induced by Fimbrin (N375) Binding

Fimbrin belongs to a superfamily of actin cross-linking proteins that share a conserved 27-kD actin-binding domain. This domain contains a tandem duplication of a sequence that is homologous to calponin. Calponin homology (CH) domains not only cross-link actin filaments into bundles and networks, but they also bind intermediate filaments and some signal transduction proteins to the actin cytoskeleton. This fundamental role of CH domains as a widely used actin-binding domain underlines the necessity to understand their structural interaction with actin. Using electron cryomicroscopy, we have determined the three-dimensional structure of F-actin and F-actin decorated with the NH₂-terminal CH domains of fimbrin (N375). In a difference map between actin filaments and N375-decorated actin, one end of N375 is bound to a concave surface formed between actin subdomains 1 and 2 on two neighboring actin monomers. In addition, a fit of the atomic model for the actin filament to the maps reveals the actin residues that line, the binding surface. The binding of N375 changes actin, which we interpret as a movement of subdomain 1 away from the bound N375. This change in actin structure may affect its affinity for other actin-binding proteins and may be part of the regulation of the cytoskeleton itself. Difference maps between actin and actin decorated with other proteins provides a way to look for novel structural changes in actin.     

Image analysis shows that variations in actin crossover spacings are random, not compensatory.

A recent paper by Bremer et al. (1991. J. Cell Biol. 115:689-703) has argued that the random angular disorder model for actin is wrong, and that the variations in crossover spacing observed in electron micrographs of F-actin filaments can be best explained by a compensatory disorder caused by the lateral slipping of the twin (or two-start) strands which comprise the actin filament. We have analyzed the images of F-actin presented in Bremer et al. and show that their data argues against compensatory disorder and in favor of random disorder, independent of the cause of the disorder. We also revise our estimate of the angular component and show that the magnitude of this disorder is about 5-6 degrees per subunit, which is less than the 10-12 degrees that we originally proposed.     

The recognition domain of the BpuJI restriction endonuclease in complex with cognate DNA at 1.3-A resolution

Type IIS restriction endonucleases recognize asymmetric DNA sequences and cleave both DNA strands at fixed positions downstream of the recognition site. The restriction endonuclease BpuJI recognizes the asymmetric sequence 5′-CCCGT; however, it cuts at multiple sites in the vicinity of the target sequence. BpuJI consists of two physically separate domains, with catalytic and dimerization functions in the C-terminal domain and DNA recognition functions in the N-terminal domain. Here we report the crystal structure of the BpuJI recognition domain bound to cognate DNA at 1.3-Å resolution. This region folds into two winged-helix subdomains, D1 and D2, interspaced by the DL subdomain. The D1 and D2 subdomains of BpuJI share structural similarity with the similar subdomains of the FokI DNA-binding domain; however, their orientations in protein-DNA complexes are different. Recognition of the 5′-CCCGT target sequence is achieved by BpuJI through the major groove contacts of amino acid residues located on both the helix-turn-helix motifs and the N-terminal arm. The role of these interactions in DNA recognition is also corroborated by mutational analysis.     

S2 domain gives myosin filaments some flexibility

JGP microscopy study supports the idea that the region linking myosin head and tail domains can be peeled away from filament backbone to prevent actin-attached heads from impeding filament movement.

Myosin II motors move along actin filaments by coupling cycles of ATP binding and hydrolysis to a repetitive process in which the myosin head domains attach to actin, undergo a conformational shift/powerstroke, and then detach. In muscle cells, myosin II molecules assemble into thick filaments containing hundreds of head domains, and any heads that remain attached to actin after completing their power stroke may impede the ability of other heads to move the filament and drive muscle contraction. In this issue of JGP, Brizendine et al. provide direct evidence that this potential drag on filament movement is limited by the flexibility of myosin II’s S2 subdomain (1).(Left to right) Richard Brizendine, Christine Cremo, and Murali Anuganti provide direct evidence that the S2 domain of myosin II is a flexible structure, which would allow it to prevent actin-attached heads from impeding the movement of myosin filaments. Quantum dots labeling a head domain (black) and the filament backbone (red) mostly follow the same trajectory as a filament moves in vitro. But, in rare instances (insets), an actin-attached head briefly lags the backbone’s trajectory before catching up, an event facilitated by the flexibility of the S2 region that connects the motor protein’s head and tail domains.For the past few years, Christine Cremo and colleagues at the University of Nevada, Reno, have been studying the kinetics of filament movement using fluorescently labeled myosin and actin filaments in vitro (2). Based on their data, Cremo’s team, in collaboration with Josh Baker, developed a mixed kinetic model that predicted a key mechanical function for the S2 subdomain of myosin II, which links the motor protein’s head domains to the C-terminal light meromyosin (LMM) domains that mediate filament assembly (3,4). According to the model, the flexibility of the S2 subdomain, and its ability to be peeled away from the filament backbone, provides some slack to actin-attached heads as the filament moves forward, giving them more time to detach before they impede the filament’s progress.“So now we wanted to see if we could directly observe this flexibility,” Cremo explains. To do this, two postdocs in Cremo’s laboratory, Richard Brizendine and Murali Anuganti, assembled smooth muscle myosin filaments labeled with two differently colored quantum dots, one attached to the LMM domain and the other attached to the head domain. Most of the time, these two labels should follow the same trajectory along actin filaments in vitro. If the S2 domain is flexible, however, it should be possible to occasionally observe an actin-attached head remain in place while the LMM domain continues moving forward. This brief “dwell” should then be followed by a “jump” as the head domain detaches from actin and catches up with the trajectory of the filament backbone.“We were looking for rare events in a sea of noise,” Cremo says, yet the researchers were able to identify dwells and jumps in the quantum dot trajectories consistent with the predicted flexibility of the S2 domain. The frequency and duration of these events fit the known kinetics of actomyosin motility.Based on their data, Brizendine et al. (1) estimate that, in smooth muscle, a myosin filament can move up to ∼52 nm without being impeded by an actin-attached head, a figure close to that predicted by the mixed kinetic model. To provide this flexibility, the researchers calculate that as much as 26 nm of the S2 domain can be unzipped from the filament backbone. Intriguingly, this matches the maximum length that S2 can be seen to project from thick filaments in tomograms of Drosophila flight muscle (5), and the forces generated by working myosin heads should be more than sufficient to achieve this unzipping.Many cardiomyopathy-associated mutations are located in the S2 region of myosin II. However, the mixed kinetic model predicts that, compared with smooth muscle, myosin filaments in cardiac and skeletal muscle cannot move quite as far without being impeded by actin-attached heads. “What leads to these differences?” Cremo wonders. “Are there differences in the biophysical behavior of the S2 domain in different muscle types?”