Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota

AIM: As a prelude to long-term studies to characterize the microbiota of the turkey ceca, 14 DNA isolation protocols were evaluated for their ability to reproducibly characterize microbial diversity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight commercially available DNA extraction kits were assessed. DNA quantity and quality were assessed and competitive PCR was used to quantify the 16S bacterial rRNA genes. The Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit extraction method for large samples yielded over eight times more DNA than any other method (3144 +/- 873 microg g(-1) of sample, P < 0.05). Bacterial and fungal species richness was estimated by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis. The Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit generated the greatest bacterial species richness (46 +/- 7 peaks) while Bio-Rad Aquapure yielded the highest fungal species richness (71 +/- 9.5 peaks). CONCLUSION: Cluster analysis indicated different DNA extraction methods generated different microbial community compositions using the same cecal matrix from a single donor bird. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Optimized DNA extraction protocols Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit extraction method for large samples and Bio-Rad Aquapure outperform other methods for extraction of DNA from poultry fecal samples, although these methods do not necessarily recover all available DNA. They will be used in future studies to monitor the dynamics of microbial communities of the avian ceca.     

Comparison of small-scale methods for the rapid extraction of plant DNA suitable for PCR analysis

We present results from a comparison of six methods for rapid DNA extraction from leaf and other plant tissues. We have used samples from six plant species in our study, including both crop species and their wild relatives. The success of the methods is assessed by PCR of the DNA using conserved primers, and the applicability of the different methods to particular species and tissues is assessed. The speed, reliability, convenience, and potential for further improvement of the methods are also discussed.     

几种提取枣和酸枣DNA用于RAPD分析的方法比较

利用不同的方法提取枣和酸枣的总DNA,并分析了不同样品状况、抗氧化剂和纯化过程等对所提DNA质量及其RAPD扩增效果的影响。实验显示：用改良CTAB法优于SDS法,可有效去除多糖。加入的抗氧化剂PVP、抗坏血酸、β-巯基乙醇等可有效阻止多酚类物质褐化,但不同抗氧化剂间效果差别不大。分别将样品干燥处理、固定处理、液氮处理、冷藏,与新鲜材料相比,用液氮处理并保存于-80℃的材料与新鲜材料所提DNA相当,而用其他方法DNA都有不同程度降解。不同材料提取结果比较显示：幼叶所提DNA产量和质量优于老叶,并且不需要较多的纯化过程。在有RNA和少量蛋白质时,对扩增结果影响不大。     

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for multiplex polymerase chain reaction

We compared six DNA extraction methods for obtaining DNA from whole blood and saliva for use in multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The aim was to evaluate saliva sampling as an alternative to blood sampling to obtain DNA for molecular diagnostics, genetic genealogy, and research purposes. The DNA quantity, DNA purity (A_260/280), PCR inhibition ratio, and mitochondrial DNA/genomic DNA ratio were measured to compare the extraction methods. The different extraction methods resulted in variable DNA quantity and purity, but there were no significant differences in the efficiency of multiplex PCR and oligomicroarray signals after single-base extension on the arrayed primer extension 2 (APEX-2).     

Comparison of three methods for DNA extraction from bone remains

Extraction of amplifiable DNA is a frequent problem when working with degraded specimens like bone samples. The possibility of obtaining as much information as possible from these samples has a particular significance in many forensic investigations. The present investigation was aimed to assess the efficiency of three organic extraction methods for purifying amplifiable DNA from bone samples. The amount of nucleic acids obtained, the success rate in the amplification of DNA microsatellite (STR) markers and amelogenin by PCR, the influence of PCR inhibitors and environmental conditions, and where the samples were found before their processing in the laboratory, were all evaluated in this investigation for the three methods. Results showed that method A (a modification of FBI method for DNA extraction) performed better in producing not a higher amount but a better quality amplifiable DNA, in comparison with the other two methods evaluated. It was also demonstrated that the quality of the DNA to be amplified by PCR was influenced by the presence of inhibitors and/or contaminants and the environmental conditions where the bone sample was taken from. The worst conditions were observed from aquatic environments. The results suggest that the implementation of some specific modifications in the method A (use of purification columns, reliable quantification methods and different dilutions) would help to obtain better DNA extracts intended to be used in different molecular identification tests.     

Comparison of methods for the extraction of DNA from stream epilithic biofilms

This study compares how different DNA extraction methods influence the quantity and quality of DNA yields from stream epilithic biofilms. Interpretations of bacterial community structure, using ARISA, revealed increased variability among samples processed using commercially-available kits, which also yielded lower DNA concentrations than other methods tested.     

模式小鼠总DNA三种提取方法比较

目的：建立简便、快捷、经济的模式小鼠总DNA提取方法,以快速鉴定大批量模式小鼠基因型。方法采用苯酚抽提法、异丙醇沉淀法、鼠耳煮沸法提取同种模式小鼠总DNA,对比DNA纯度、得率、耗费时间,并比较基因型鉴定结果。结果苯酚抽提法得率最高,异丙醇沉淀法最低;而纯度则按照苯酚抽提法、异丙醇沉淀法、鼠耳煮沸法顺序递减;在耗时上鼠耳煮沸法最短。三种方法提取的DNA均可做模版用于基因型鉴定。结论鼠耳煮沸法操作简单、成本最低,快速、基因型鉴定结果可靠,可用于规模化的基因型鉴定实验中。     

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling

The human gut harbors a vast range of microbes that have significant impact on health and disease. Therefore, gut microbiome profiling holds promise for use in early diagnosis and precision medicine development. Accurate profiling of the highly complex gut microbiome requires DNA extraction methods that provide sufficient coverage of the original community as well as adequate quality and quantity. We tested nine different DNA extraction methods using three commercial kits (TianLong Stool DNA/RNA Extraction Kit (TS), QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QS), and QIAamp PowerFecal DNA Kit (QP)) with or without additional bead-beating step using manual or automated methods and compared them in terms of DNA extraction ability from human fecal sample. All methods produced DNA in sufficient concentration and quality for use in sequencing, and the samples were clustered according to the DNA extraction method. Inclusion of bead-beating step especially resulted in higher degrees of microbial diversity and had the greatest effect on gut microbiome composition. Among the samples subjected to bead-beating method, TS kit samples were more similar to QP kit samples than QS kit samples. Our results emphasize the importance of mechanical disruption step for a more comprehensive profiling of the human gut microbiome.     

Comparison of five DNA extraction methods for molecular analysis of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus)

DNA extraction is an essential step for molecular analysis of an organism, but it is difficult to acquire a sufficient amount of pure DNA from plant tissue with high levels of phenolic compounds, carbohydrates, proteins, and secondary metabolites. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) has high levels of such substances. We compared five commonly used methods of extracting genomic DNA in tests made with leaves and seed of four Jerusalem artichoke genotypes: 1) modified method of Tai and Tanksley, 2) method of Doyle and Doyle, 3) method of Porebski, 4) modified method of ?torchová, and 5) Plant DNA Kit of Omega Bio-tek. The quality and quantity of extracted DNAs were assessed by photometric assay, electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel and a PCR-based technique. The modified method of Tai and Tanksley was found to be superior for both young leaves and seed. The quality of the extracted DNA was confirmed by sequence-related amplified polymorphism. This information will be useful for molecular analyses of Jerusalem artichoke and other related Helianthus species.     

Computer-assisted PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism analysis for assessing shift in soil bacterial community structure during bioremediational treatments

The extent of shift in soil bacterial community structure during bioremediational treatments was investigated by PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis, which was followed by computer-assisted cluster analysis of the community fingerprints. While biostimulation as well as bioaugmentation enhanced the degradation of phenanthrene in soil, both bioremediational treatments caused shifts in the bacterial community structure. Drastic changes were observed in the initial phase of bioaugmentation. Our results demonstrate that computer-assisted fingerprint analysis is readily applicable to the study for the comparative analysis of microbial community structure using molecular profiling techniques.     

Comparison of methods for total community DNA extraction and purification from compost

The differences on DNA yield and purity of three different DNA extraction protocols were compared with regard to the use for PCR and other molecular analyses. Total DNA was extracted from compost by the three protocols, and then was purified by spin-bind cartridges after being precipitated by PEG8000. The detection performed on a nucleic acid and protein analyzer showed that all three methods produced high DNA yields. The agarose gel electrophoresis showed that the fragments of crude and purified DNA had a length of about 23 kb. A eubacterial 16S rRNA gene-targeted primer pair was used for PCR amplification, and full length 16S rDNAs were amplified from all the purified DNA samples. After being digested by restriction endonucleases, the restriction map of amplified rDNA showed identical genetic diversity. The products of PCR using primer pair GC341F and 907R were also used for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. The results indicated that high-quality DNA was extracted from compost by the three protocols, and each of the protocols is adapted to extract microbial genome DNA from compost expediently and cheaply.     

不同粪便DNA提取方法比较分析北大核心CSCD

肠道微生物群落结构和多样性与人体疾病密切相关。然而,相关群落结构分析结果可能受到DNA提取质量等实验因素影响。因此,评估不同DNA提取方法对肠道特定种属的提取效果,对于全面、准确获取人体肠道微生物谱,深入探究肠道微生物群落结构具有指导意义。本研究旨在借助实时荧光定量PCR(real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction,RT qPCR)技术,以DNA提取纯度、浓度,以及对肠道中特定种属微生物基因组DNA的提取丰度为指标,对5种DNA提取方法进行比较分析。结果表明,试剂盒Q的提取效果最佳,特别是对乳杆菌属和双歧杆菌属等革兰氏阳性菌的提取效果较好。N试剂盒的平均DNA提取浓度较Q试剂盒低,但在纯度方面,二者无显著性差异。与其他3种商用试剂盒(M、PSP、TG)相比,N方法对肠道内指定微生物基因组的提取效果仅次于Q试剂盒,位居第二。相比之下,M试剂盒提取所得DNA,质量较高,但浓度偏低,对于肠道内革兰氏阳性菌的提取效果不很理想。TG试剂盒和PSP试剂盒提取所得DNA在浓度、质量以及细菌丰度方面均不及其他验证的试剂盒。综上,Q试剂盒可作为肠道微生态研究相关实验中获取高质量基因组DNA的提取方法。本研究结果为肠道微生态研究相关实验中基因组DNA提取方法的选择提供参考依据。     

鸡肠道菌群总DNA三种提取方法的比较

目的比较不同方法提取鸡肠道菌群总DNA的差异,为分子方法分析肠道菌群组成提供质量较高的DNA模板。方法采用反复冻融法、酶裂解法和试剂盒法（E.N.Z.A Stool DNA Kit）来提取鸡肠道菌群的总DNA,并根据DNA浓度及纯度、16S DNA扩增产物和ERIC-PCR产物所反映的片段多态性4个指标,对这3种方法提取的DNA质量进行比较。结果3种方法均能提取DNA,所得DNA都可以用于16S DNA的扩增,但后2种方法所得DNA的ERIC-PCR结果能反映出更高的菌群多样性。结论试剂盒法和酶裂解法所提取的DNA质量好,适合用于肠道菌群的分子生态研究。     

Comparison of methods of DNA extraction from stream sediments.

In Upper Three Runs Creek (Aiken, S.C.) and many other environments, less than 1% of bacteria visible microscopically can be cultured. Exploitation of molecular biology techniques has led to development of new methods, such as extraction of nucleic acids from soils or sediments, to study the dominant, nonculturable bacteria. The purpose of this study was to compare three published methods of DNA extraction that fall into two general categories: those in which cells are lysed in sediments (the Ogram and Tsai and methods [A. Ogram, G. S. Sayler, and T. Barkay, J. Microbiol. Methods 7:57-66, 1987; Y. L. Tsai and B. H. Olson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:1070-1074, 1991]) and those in which cells are removed from sediments prior to lysis (the Jacobsen method [C. S. Jacobsen and O. S. Rasmussen; Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:2458-2462, 1992]). DNA yield varied with extraction method; the Ogram method had a significantly higher yield than the other methods. However, DNA extracted via the Ogram method was badly sheared and contained a smaller proportion of eubacterial DNA. The Tsai method was less time consuming than the other methods, but DNA samples were of lower purity. If DNA purity is of paramount concern (as would be the case if PCR was to be performed) and quantity is not important, the Jacobsen method is recommended because of the low concentration of contaminants. If DNA is to be used directly in DNA-DNA hybridizations, the Ogram method is recommended since it gives maximal yields.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

革兰氏阳性细菌基因组DNA提取方法的比较及优化

【目的】基因组DNA提取效率和质量对分子生物学相关研究起着关键的作用,革兰氏阳性细菌由于细胞壁较厚、难破裂使其基因组DNA提取的难度增大,本文旨在寻找一种高效稳定的DNA提取方法。【方法】以Clostridium thermocellum和Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum为实验菌株,使用6种DNA提取方法对C. thermocellum基因组DNA进行提取,对比其提取效果和产率。【结果】改良的SDS-碱裂解法提取得到的DNA浓度较高(400 mg/l左右),且平行样间浓度和纯度稳定。【结论】为革兰氏阳性细菌基因组DNA提取提供参考。     

Comparison of destructive and nondestructive DNA extraction methods for the metabarcoding of arthropod bulk samples

DNA metabarcoding is routinely used for biodiversity assessment, in particular targeting highly diverse groups for which limited taxonomic expertise is available. Various protocols are currently in use, although standardization is key to its application in large-scale monitoring. DNA metabarcoding of arthropod bulk samples can be conducted either destructively from sample tissue, or nondestructively from sample fixative or lysis buffer. Nondestructive methods are highly desirable for the preservation of sample integrity but have yet to be experimentally evaluated in detail. Here, we compare diversity estimates from 14 size-sorted Malaise trap samples processed consecutively with three nondestructive approaches (one using fixative ethanol and two using lysis buffers) and one destructive approach (using homogenized tissue). Extraction from commercial lysis buffer yielded comparable species richness and high overlap in species composition to the ground tissue extracts. A significantly divergent community was detected from preservative ethanol-based DNA extraction. No consistent trend in species richness was found with increasing incubation time in lysis buffer. These results indicate that nondestructive DNA extraction from incubation in lysis buffer could provide a comparable alternative to destructive approaches with the added advantage of preserving the specimens for postmetabarcoding taxonomic work but at a higher cost per sample.     

猪源性成分检测中3种DNA提取方法比较

为了达到对动物源性成分快速、准确的检定,对提取动物源性基因组DNA的方法进行了比较分析。考察酚-三氯甲烷法、聚乙烯吡咯烷酮法(PVP法)和试剂盒法这3种方法对DNA提取的浓度、纯度及实时荧光PCR扩增效果的影响。结果表明:酚-三氯甲烷法提取DNA浓度最高,试剂盒法纯度最高且实时荧光PCR扩增效果最好,但PVP法操作简单、安全、经济,提取的DNA用于实时荧光PCR扩增检出限可达1.98 pg/μL。使用PVP法对市场上10份不同类型的动物性产品进行了检测,检出两份产品中含有猪源性成分。PVP法应是3种方法中的首选方法,本文为实验室选择合适的DNA提取方法提供了依据。     

Comparison of methods for the extraction of plant lipids

The ability of a number of different solvent systems to extract lipid from a range of plant tissues was compared by measurement of phospholipid, glycolipid, sterol lipid and total acyl lipid content. A chloroform-methanol extraction method based upon the principles of Bligh and Dyer was considered to be the most efficient system for use with the majority of plant tissues. Cereal seeds were anomalous in that water saturated n- butanol was the preferred solvent system due to its superior ability to extract bound lysophospholipids present in large amounts in the endosperm portion of the tissue.     

Comparison of fluorescent tag DNA labeling methods used for expression analysis by DNA microarrays

Gene expression profiling by DNA microarrays has found wide application in many fields of biomedical research. The protocols for this technique are not yet standardized, and for each given step in microarray analysis a number of different protocols are in use. As a consequence, results obtained in different laboratories can be difficult to compare. Of particular importance in this respect are the methods for the preparation of fluorescent cDNA probes that should quantitatively reflect the abundance of different mRNAs in the two samples to be compared. Here we systematically evaluate and compare five different published and/or commercial principles for the synthesis offluorescently labeled probes for microarray analysis (direct labeling, 77 RNA polymerase amplification, aminoallyl labeling, hapten-antibody enzymatic labeling, and 3-D multi-labeled structures). We show that individual labeling methods can significantly influence the expression pattern obtained in a microarray experiment and discuss the respective benefits and limitations of each method.