An intermediate step in the recognition of tRNA(Asp) by aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

The crystal structures of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from Thermus thermophilus, a prokaryotic class IIb enzyme, complexed with tRNA(Asp) from either T. thermophilus or Escherichia coli reveal a potential intermediate of the recognition process. The tRNA is positioned on the enzyme such that it cannot be aminoacylated but adopts an overall conformation similar to that observed in active complexes. While the anticodon loop binds to the N-terminal domain of the enzyme in a manner similar to that of the related active complexes, its aminoacyl acceptor arm remains at the entrance of the active site, stabilized in its intermediate conformational state by non-specific interactions with the insertion and catalytic domains. The thermophilic nature of the enzyme, which manifests itself in a very low kinetic efficiency at 17 degrees C, the temperature at which the crystals were grown, is in agreement with the relative stability of this non-productive conformational state. Based on these data, a pathway for tRNA binding and recognition is proposed.     

Different adaptations of the same peptide motif for tRNA functional contacts by closely homologous tRNA synthetases

The N73 nucleotide at the end of the tRNA acceptor stem is commonly used by tRNA synthetases for discrimination. Because only a few synthetase-tRNA cocrystal structures have been determined, understanding of the molecular basis for N73 discrimination is limited. Here we investigated the possibility that, for at least some synthetases, the capacity to recognize different N73 nucleotides resides in the variable sequence of the loop of motif 2, a motif found in all class II enzymes. In the cocrystal of the class II yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, atomic groups of the G73 discriminator of tRNAAsp interact with three side chains of the enzyme. We examined lysyl-tRNA synthetase, a close structural homologue of the aspartyl enzyme. Different substitutions were introduced into the Escherichia coli enzyme (A73 discriminator) to make its loop more like that of the human enzyme (G73 discriminator). Our data show that the loop of motif 2 of the lysine enzyme makes tRNA functional contacts, as predicted from the structural comparison. And yet, the E. coli enzyme with the "humanized" loop sequence had the same quantitative kinetic preference for A73 versus G as the wild-type enzyme. We conclude that discriminator base selectivity in the lysine enzyme requires residues in addition to or other than those in the loop of motif 2. Thus, even tRNA synthetases that are close structural homologues may use the same RNA binding element to make functional contacts with places (in the acceptor stem) that are idiosyncratic to each synthetase-tRNA pair.     

The solution structure of the Escherichia coli initiator tRNA and its interactions with initiation factor 2 and the ribosomal 30 S subunit

The conformation of the Escherichia coli initiator tRNA has been investigated using enzymatic and chemical probes. This study was conducted on the naked tRNA and on the tRNA involved in the various steps leading to the formation of the 30 S.IF-2.GTP.fMet-tRNA.AUG complex. A three-dimensional model of the initiator tRNA is presented, which displays several differences with yeast tRNAPhe: (i) the anticodon arm is more rigid; (ii) the presence of an additional nucleotide in the D loop results in specific features in both T and D loops; (iii) C1 and A72 might form a noncanonical base pair. Aminoacylation and formylation induce subtle conformational adjustments near the 3' end, the T arm and the D loop. Initiation factor (IF) 2 interacts with a rather limited portion of the tRNA, covering the T loop and the minor groove of the T stem, and induces an increased flexibility in the anticodon arm. The specific structural features observed in the T loop are probably recognized by IF-2. In the 30 S.IF-2.GTP.fMet-tRNA.AUG complex, additional protections are observed in the acceptor stem and in the anticodon arm, resulting from a strong steric hindrance and from the codon-anticodon interaction within the subunit decoding site.     

molecular mechanism of lysidine synthesis that determines tRNA identity and codon recognition

Lysidine (2-lysyl cytidine) is a lysine-containing cytidine derivative commonly found at the wobble position of bacterial AUA codon-specific tRNA(Ile). This modification determines both codon and amino acid specificities of tRNA(Ile). We previously identified tRNA(Ile)-lysidine synthetase (tilS) that synthesizes lysidine, for which it utilizes ATP and lysine as substrates. Here, we show that lysidine synthesis consists of two consecutive reactions that involve an adenylated tRNA intermediate. A mutation study revealed that Escherichia coli TilS discriminates tRNA(Ile) from the structurally similar tRNA(Met) having the same anticodon loop by recognizing the anticodon loop, the anticodon stem, and the acceptor stem. TilS was shown to bind to the anticodon region and 3' side of the acceptor stem, which cover the recognition sites. These findings reveal a dedicated mechanism embedded in tRNA(Ile) that controls its recognition and discrimination by TilS, and indicate the significance of this enzyme in the proper deciphering of genetic information.     

Alignment/misalignment hypothesis for tRNA selection by the ribosome

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the adaptor molecules that allow the ribosome to decode genetic information during protein synthesis. During decoding, the ribosome must chose the tRNA whose anticodon corresponds to the codon inscribed in the messenger RNA to incorporate the correct amino acid into the growing polypeptide chain. Fidelity is improved dramatically by a GTP hydrolysis event. Information about the correctness of the anticodon must be sent from the decoding center to the elongation factor, EF-Tu, where the GTP hydrolysis takes place. A second discrimination event entails the accommodation of the aminoacyl-tRNA into its fully bound A/A state inside the ribosome. Here, we present a hypothesis for a specific mechanism of signal transduction through the tRNA, which operates during GTPase activation and accommodation. We propose that the rigidity of the tRNA plays an important role in the transmission of the decoding signal. While the tRNA must flex during binding and accommodation, its anisotropic stiffness enables precise positioning of the acceptor arm in the A/T state, the A/A state and the accommodation corridor. Correct alignment will result in optimal GTPase activation and accommodation rates. Incorrect tRNAs, however, whose anticodons are misaligned, will also have acceptor arms that are misaligned, resulting in sub-optimal GTPase activation and accommodation rates. In the case of GTPase activation, it is possible that the misalignment of the acceptor arm affects the rate directly, by altering the conformational change of the switch region of EF-Tu, or indirectly, by changing the alignment of EF-Tu with respect to the sarcin-ricin loop (SRL) of the large ribosomal subunit.     

Evolutionary coadaptation of the motif 2--acceptor stem interaction in the class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase system

Known crystal structures of class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases complexed to their cognate tRNAs reveal that critical acceptor stem contacts are made by the variable loop connecting the beta-strands of motif 2 located within the catalytic core of class II synthetases. To identify potential acceptor stem contacts made by Escherichia coli prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS), an enzyme of unknown structure, we performed cysteine-scanning mutagenesis in the motif 2 loop. We identified an arginine residue (R144) that was essential for tRNA aminoacylation but played no role in amino acid activation. Cross-linking experiments confirmed that the end of the tRNA(Pro) acceptor stem is proximal to this motif 2 loop residue. Previous work had shown that the tRNA(Pro) acceptor stem elements A73 and G72 (both strictly conserved among bacteria) are important recognition elements for E. coli ProRS. We carried out atomic group "mutagenesis" studies at these two positions of E. coli tRNA(Pro) and determined that major groove functional groups at A73 and G72 are critical for recognition by ProRS. Human tRNA(Pro), which lacks these elements, is not aminoacylated by the bacterial enzyme. An analysis of chimeric tRNA(Pro) constructs showed that, in addition to A73 and G72, transplantation of the E. coli tRNA(Pro) D-domain was necessary and sufficient to convert the human tRNA into a substrate for the bacterial synthetase. In contrast to the bacterial system, base-specific acceptor stem recognition does not appear to be used by human ProRS. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis revealed that motif 2 loop residues are not critical for tRNA aminoacylation activity of the human enzyme. Taken together, our results illustrate how synthetases and tRNAs have coadapted to changes in protein-acceptor stem recognition through evolution.     

Evidence for breaking domain-domain functional communication in a synthetase-tRNA complex

We report here evidence for mutations that break domain-domain functional communication in a synthetase-tRNA complex. Each synthetase is roughly divided into two major domains that are paralleled by the two arms of the L-shaped tRNA structure. The active-site-containing domain interacts with the acceptor arm of the tRNA. The second domain frequently interacts with the anticodon-containing arm. By an induced-fit mechanism, contacts with the anticodon can activate formation of a robust transition state at a site over 70 A away. This induced-fit-based activation is thought to occur through domain-domain signaling and is seen by the enhancement of aminoacylation of the anticodon-containing full tRNA versus a substrate based on the acceptor arm alone. Here we describe a rationally designed mutant methionyl-tRNA synthetase containing two point substitutions at sites that potentially link an anticodon-binding motif to the catalytic domain. The double mutation had no effect on interactions with either the isolated acceptor arm or the anticodon stem-loop. In contrast to interactions with the separate pieces, the mutant enzyme was severely impaired for binding the native tRNA and lost much of its ability to enhance the rate of charging of the full tRNA over that of a substrate based on the acceptor arm alone. We propose that these residues are part of a network for facilitating domain-domain communication for formation of an active synthetase-tRNA complex by induced fit.     

Secondary structure at the 3' terminal region of RNA coliphages: comparison with tRNA

Secondary structure models for the 3' non-coding region of the four groups of coliphage RNA are proposed based on comparative sequence analysis and on previously published data on the sensitivity of nucleotides in MS2 RNA to chemical modification and enzymes. We report the following observations. (1) In contrast to the coding regions, the structure at the 3' terminus is characterized by stable regular helices. We note the occurrence of the loop sequences 5'-GUUCGC and 5'-CGAAAG, that are reported to confer exceptional stability to stem structures. These features are probably present to promote the segregation of mother and daughter strands during replication. (2) Comparison of homologous helices indicates that only those base pair substitutions are allowed that maintain the thermodynamic stability. (3) We have compared the structure of phage RNA with tRNA. Overall similarity is low, but one common element may exist. It is a quasi-continuous helix of 12 basepairs that could be the equivalent of the 12 basepair long coaxially stacked helix, formed by the T psi C arm and the aminoacyl acceptor arm in tRNA. As in tRNA, this structure element starts after the fourth nucleotide from the 3' end. (4) Phage RNA contains a large variable region of about 35 nucleotides bulging out from the quasi-continuous helix. We speculate that the variable loop in present-day tRNA could be the remnant of the variable region found in phage RNA. The variable region contains overlapping binding sites for the replicase enzyme and the maturation protein. This common binding site may serve as a switch from replication to packaging.     

Class I tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase has a class II mode of cognate tRNA recognition

Bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases (TyrRS) possess a flexibly linked C-terminal domain of approximately 80 residues, which has hitherto been disordered in crystal structures of the enzyme. We have determined the structure of Thermus thermophilus TyrRS at 2.0 A resolution in a crystal form in which the C-terminal domain is ordered, and confirm that the fold is similar to part of the C-terminal domain of ribosomal protein S4. We have also determined the structure at 2.9 A resolution of the complex of T.thermophilus TyrRS with cognate tRNA(tyr)(G Psi A). In this structure, the C-terminal domain binds between the characteristic long variable arm of the tRNA and the anti-codon stem, thus recognizing the unique shape of the tRNA. The anticodon bases have a novel conformation with A-36 stacked on G-34, and both G-34 and Psi-35 are base-specifically recognized. The tRNA binds across the two subunits of the dimeric enzyme and, remarkably, the mode of recognition of the class I TyrRS for its cognate tRNA resembles that of a class II synthetase in being from the major groove side of the acceptor stem.     

tRNA integrity is a prerequisite for rapid CCA addition: implication for quality control

CCA addition to the 3′ end is an essential step in tRNA maturation. High-resolution crystal structures of the CCA enzymes reveal primary enzyme contact with the tRNA minihelix domain, consisting of the acceptor stem and T stem-loop. RNA and DNA minihelices are efficient substrates for CCA addition in steady-state kinetics. However, in contrast to structural models and steady-state experiments, we show here by single-turnover kinetics that minihelices are insufficient substrates for the Escherichia coli CCA enzyme and that only the full-length tRNA is kinetically competent. Even a nick in the full-length tRNA backbone in the T loop, or as far away from the minihelix domain as in the anticodon loop, prevents efficient CCA addition. These results suggest a kinetic quality control provided by the CCA enzyme to inspect the integrity of the tRNA molecule and to discriminate against nicked or damaged species from further maturation.     

Cleavage efficiencies of model substrates for ribonuclease P from Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus.

We compared cleavage efficiencies of mono-molecular and bipartite model RNAs as substrates for RNase P RNAs (M1 RNAs) and holoenzymes from E. coli and Thermus thermophilus, an extreme thermophilic eubacterium. Acceptor stem and T arm of pre-tRNA substrates are essential recognition elements for both enzymes. Impairing coaxial stacking of acceptor and T stems and omitting the T loop led to reduced cleavage efficiencies. Small model substrates were less efficiently cleaved by M1 RNA and RNase P from T. thermophilus than by the corresponding E. coli activities. Competition kinetics and gel retardation studies showed that truncated tRNA substrates are less tightly bound by RNase P and M1 RNA from both bacteria. Our data further indicate that (pre-)tRNA interacts stronger with E. coli than T. thermophilus M1 RNA. Thus, low cleavage efficiencies of truncated model substrates by T. thermophilus RNase P or M1 RNA could be explained by a critical loss of important contact points between enzyme and substrate. In addition, acceptor stem--T arm substrates, composed of two synthetic RNA fragments, have been designed to mimic internal cleavage of any target RNA molecule available for base pairing.     

Determinants in tRNA for activation of arginyl-tRNA synthetase: evidence that tRNA flexibility is required for the induced-fit mechanism

Arginyl-tRNA synthetase (ArgRS) catalyzes formation of arginyl-adenylate in a tRNA-dependent reaction. Previous studies have revealed that conformational changes occur upon tRNA binding. In this study, we analyzed the sequence and structural features of tRNA that are essential to activate the catalytic center of mammalian arginyl-tRNA synthetase. Here, tRNA variants with different activator potential are presented. The three regions that are crucial for activation of ArgRS are the terminal adenosine, the D-loop, and the anticodon stem-loop of tRNA. The Add-1 N-terminal domain of ArgRS, which has the very unique property among aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to interact with the D-loop in the corner of the convex side of tRNA, has an essential role in anchoring tRNA and participating in tRNA-induced amino acid activation. The results suggest that locking the acceptor extremity, the anticodon loop, and the D-loop of tRNA on the catalytic, anticodon-binding, and Add-1 domains of ArgRS also requires some flexibility of the tRNA molecule, provided by G:U base pairs, to achieve the productive conformation of the active site of the enzyme by induced fit.     

Differences in the interaction of Escherichia coli RNase P RNA with tRNAs containing a short or a long extra arm.

The phosphorothioate footprinting technique was applied to the investigation of phosphate moieties in tRNA substrates involved in interactions with M1 RNA, the catalytic subunit of Escherichia coli RNase P. In general agreement with previous data, all affected sites were localized in acceptor stem and T arm. But the analyzed examples for class I (Saccharomyces cerevisiae pre-tRNA(Phe) with short variable arm) and class II tRNAs (E. coli pre-tRNA(Tyr) with large variable arm) revealed substantial differences. In the complex with pre-tRNA(Phe), protection was observed at U55, C56, and G57, along the top of the T loop in the tertiary structure, whereas in pre-tRNA(Tyr), the protected positions were G57, A58, and A59, at the bottom of the T loop. These differences suggest that the size of the variable arm affects the spatial arrangement of the T arm, providing a possible explanation for the discrepancy in reports about the D arm requirement in truncated tRNA substrates for eukaryotic RNase P enzymes. Enhanced reactivities were found near the junction of acceptor and T stem (U6, 7, 8 in pre-tRNA(Phe) and G7, U63, U64 in pre-tRNA(Tyr)). This indicates a partial unfolding of the tRNA structure upon complex formation with RNase P RNA.     

Domains of the Escherichia coli threonyl-tRNA synthetase translational operator and their relation to threonine tRNA isoacceptors.

The expression of the gene for threonyl-tRNA synthetase (thrS) is negatively autoregulated at the translational level in Escherichia coli. The synthetase binds to a region of the thrS leader mRNA upstream from the ribosomal binding site inhibiting subsequent translation. The leader mRNA consists of four structural domains. The present work shows that mutations in these four domains affect expression and/or regulation in different ways. Domain 1, the 3' end of the leader, contains the ribosomal binding site, which appears not to be essential for synthetase binding. Mutations in this domain probably affect regulation by changing the competition between the ribosome and the synthetase for binding to the leader. Domain 2, 3' from the ribosomal binding site, is a stem and loop with structural similarities to the tRNA(Thr) anticodon arm. In tRNAs the anticodon loop is seven nucleotides long, mutations that increase or decrease the length of the anticodon-like loop of domain 2 from seven nucleotides abolish control. The nucleotides in the second and third positions of the anticodon-like sequence are essential for recognition and the nucleotide in the wobble position is not, again like tRNA(Thr). The effect of mutations in domain 3 indicate that it acts as an articulation between domains 2 and 4. Domain 4 is a stable arm that has similarities to the acceptor arm of tRNA(Thr) and is shown to be necessary for regulation. Based on this mutational analysis and previous footprinting experiments, it appears that domains 2 and 4, those analogous to tRNA(Thr), are involved in binding the synthetase which inhibits translation probably by interfering with ribosome loading at the nearby translation initiation site.     

Co-evolution of the archaeal tRNA-dependent amidotransferase GatCAB with tRNA(Asn)

The important identity elements in tRNA(Gln) and tRNA(Asn) for bacterial GatCAB and in tRNA(Gln) for archaeal GatDE are the D-loop and the first base pair of the acceptor stem. Here we show that Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus GatCAB, the archaeal enzyme, is different as it discriminates Asp-tRNA(Asp) and Asp-tRNA(Asn) by use of U49, the D-loop and to a lesser extent the variable loop. Since archaea possess the tRNA(Gln)-specific amidotransferase GatDE, the archaeal GatCAB enzyme evolved to recognize different elements in tRNA(Asn) than those recognized by GatDE or by the bacterial GatCAB enzyme in their tRNA substrates.     

Mitochondrial sequence evolution in spiders: intraspecific variation in tRNAs lacking the TPsiC Arm

Analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences from three species of Habronattus jumping spiders (Chelicerata: Arachnida: Araneae) reveal unusual inferred tRNA secondary structures and gene arrangements, providing new information on tRNA evolution within chelicerate arthropods. Sequences from the protein-coding genes NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (ND1), cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI), and subunit II (COII) were obtained, along with tRNA, tRNA, and large-subunit ribosomal RNA (16S) sequences; these revealed several peculiar features. First, inferred secondary structures of tRNA and, likely, tRNA, lack the TPsiC arm and the variable arm and therefore do not form standard cloverleaf structures. In place of these arms is a 5-6-nt T arm-variable loop (TV) replacement loop such as that originally described from nematode mitochondrial tRNAs. Intraspecific variation occurs in the acceptor stem sequences in both tRNAs. Second, while the proposed secondary structure of the 3' end of 16S is similar to that reported for insects, the sequence at the 5' end is extremely divergent, and the entire gene is truncated about 300 nt with respect to Drosophila yakuba. Third, initiation codons appear to consist of ATY (ATT and ATC) and TTG for ND1 and COII, respectively. Finally, Habronattus shares the same ND1-tRNA-16S gene arrangement as insects and crustaceans, thus illustrating variation in a tRNA gene arrangement previously proposed as a character distinguishing chelicerates from insects and crustaceans.     

Solution conformations of unmodified and A(37)N(6)-dimethylallyl modified anticodon stem-loops of Escherichia coli tRNA(Phe)

The modification of RNA nucleotide bases, a fundamental process in all cells, alters the chemical and physical properties of RNA molecules and broadly impacts the physiological properties of cells. tRNA molecules are by far the most diverse-modified RNA species within cells, containing as a group >80% of the known 96 chemically unique nucleic acid modifications. The greatest varieties of modifications are located on residue 37 and play a role in ensuring fidelity and efficiency of protein synthesis. The enzyme dimethylallyl (Delta(2)-isopentenyl) diphosphate:tRNA transferase catalyzes the addition of a dimethylallyl group to the exocyclic amine nitrogen (N6) of A(37) in several tRNA species. Using a 17 residue oligoribonucleotide corresponding to the anticodon arm of Escherichia coli tRNA(Phe), we have investigated the structural and dynamic changes introduced by the dimethylallyl group. The unmodified RNA molecule adopts stem-loop conformation composed of seven base-pairs and a compact three nucleotide loop. This conformation is distinctly different from the U-turn motif that characterizes the anticodon arm in the X-ray crystal structure of the fully modified yeast tRNA(Phe). The adoption of the tri-nucleotide loop by the purine-rich unmodified tRNA(Phe) anticodon arm suggests that other anticodon sequences, especially those containing pyrimidine bases, also may favor a tri-loop conformation. Introduction of the dimethylallyl modification increases the mobility of nucleotides of the loop region but does not dramatically alter the RNA conformation. The dimethylallyl modification may enhance ribosome binding through multiple mechanisms including destabilization of the closed anticodon loop and stabilization of the codon-anticodon helix.