Magnitude of a Conformational Change in the Glycine Receptor ��1-��2 Loop Is Correlated with Agonist Efficacy

The efficacy of agonists at Cys-loop ion channel receptors is determined by the rate they isomerize receptors to a pre-open flip state. Once the flip state is reached, the shut-open reaction is similar for low and high efficacy agonists. The present study sought to identify a conformational change associated with the closed-flip transition in the α1-glycine receptor. We employed voltage-clamp fluorometry to compare ligand-binding domain conformational changes induced by the following agonists, listed from highest to lowest affinity and efficacy: glycine > β-alanine > taurine. Voltage-clamp fluorometry involves labeling introduced cysteines with environmentally sensitive fluorophores and inferring structural rearrangements from ligand-induced fluorescence changes. Agonist affinity and efficacy correlated inversely with maximum fluorescence magnitudes at labeled residues in ligand-binding domain loops D and E, suggesting that large conformational changes in this region preclude efficacious gating. However, agonist affinity and efficacy correlated directly with maximum fluorescence magnitudes from a label attached to A52C in loop 2, near the transmembrane domain interface. Because glycine experiences the largest affinity increase between closed and flip states, we propose that the magnitude of this fluorescence signal is directly proportional to the agonist affinity increase. In contrast, labeled residues in loops C, F, and the pre-M1 domain yielded agonist-independent fluorescence responses. Our results support the conclusion that a closed-flip conformation change, with a magnitude proportional to the agonist affinity increase from closed to flip states, occurs in the microenvironment of Ala-52.Glycine receptors (GlyRs)³ are pentameric chloride-selective ion channels that mediate fast inhibitory neurotransmission (1). They are members of the Cys-loop receptor family that includes the prototypical nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), the γ-aminobutyric acid type-A receptors (GABA_ARs), and serotonin type-3 receptors (5-HT₃Rs). Recent structural studies have provided a wealth of information on the structure and function of this receptor family (2–6). In Cys-loop receptors, the ligand-binding domain (LBD) preceding the four transmembrane helices consists of two twisted β-sheets. The inner (vestibule facing) β-sheet comprises seven β-strands, while the outer β-sheet is formed by three β-strands (3). The ligand binding site is located at the interface of adjacent subunits and is lined by six domains: three loops from the principal and the complementary sides, termed A-C and D-F, respectively (3).GlyRs are activated by endogenous amino acid agonists in the following order of efficacy: glycine > β-alanine > taurine (7, 8). As these amino acids share considerable structural similarity (Fig. 1A), they are likely to compete for the same binding site (9–11). A recent ground-breaking study on an intermediate pre-open state, the so-called “flip” state (12), has provided new insights into the mechanism of partial agonism in Cys-loop receptors (13). This study suggested that agonist efficacy depends on the ability of the agonist to convert the inert agonist-bound receptor to the pre-open flip state. Once the flip state is reached, the shut-open reaction is similar for high and low efficacy agonists. To date there is, however, very little information concerning the structural basis for the lower efficacies of partial agonists. To address this, the present study employed the voltage-clamp fluorometry (VCF) technique (14) to compare the conformational changes induced by glycine, β-alanine, and taurine at various positions in the GlyR LBD.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.A, structures of glycine, β-alanine, and taurine. B, model of the LBD, based on carbomylcholine-bound AChBP (PDB code 1uv6). The inner β-sheet is displayed in red, the outer β-sheet in blue. Connecting loops are shown in gray. Colored balls represent approximate locations of selected residues labeled in regions flanking the outer β-sheet (black, G181C in loop F; N203C in loop C; Q219C in the pre-M1 domain) and in the inner β-sheet (yellow, L127C in loop E; Q67C in loop D; A52C in loop 2).VCF involves tethering of an environmentally sensitive fluorophore to a cysteine engineered into a domain of interest. If ligand-binding and/or channel opening leads to a changed dielectric environment surrounding the fluorophore, a change in quantum yield or emission spectrum can be detected. VCF was first employed on voltage-gated potassium channels (15) and has since provided a wealth of information on Cys-loop receptor structure and function (16–23). Here we employ VCF to identify an agonist-specific conformational change that may control or reflect the rate at which the GlyR isomerizes to the flip state.     

UDP Facilitates Microglial Phagocytosis Through P2Y6 Receptors

Microglia engage in the clearance of dead cells or dangerous debris. When neighboring cells are injured, the cells release or leak ATP into extracellular space and microglia rapidly move toward or extend a process to the nucleotides as chemotaxis through P2Y12 receptors. In the meanwhile, microglia express the metabotropic P2Y6 receptors, the activation of which by uridine 5′-diphosphate (UDP) triggers microglial phagocytosis in a concentration-dependent fashion. UDP/UTP was leaked when hippocampal neurons were damaged by kainic acid in vivo and in vitro. Systemic administration of kainic acid in rats resulted in neuronal cell death in the hippocampal CA1 and CA3 regions, where increases in mRNA for P2Y6 receptors in activated microglia. Thus, the P2Y6 receptor is upregulated when neurons are damaged, and would function as a sensor for phagocytosis by sensing diffusible UDP signals.Key Words: microglia, phagocytosis, P2Y6 receptors, UDPAccumulating findings indicate that nucleotides play an important role in neuron to glia communication through P2 purinoceptors, even though ATP is recognized primarily to be a source of free energy and nucleotides are key molecules in cells. P2 purinoceptors are divided into two families, ionotropic receptors (P2X) and metabotropic receptors (P2Y) (Fig. 1). P2X receptors (seven types; P2X₁-P2X₇) contain intrinsic pores that open by binding with ATP. P2Y (eight types; P2Y_{1,2,4,6 and 11–14}) are activated by nucleotides and couple to intracellular second-messenger systems through heteromeric G-proteins.¹ Microglia express P2X₄, P2X₇, P2Y₂, P2Y₆ and P2Y₁₂¹ and are known as resident macrophages in CNS, accounting for 5–10% of the total population of glia.^2,3 When neurons are injured or dead, microglia are activated, resulting in their interaction with immune cells, active migration to the site of injury, release of pro-inflammatory substances and the phagocytosis of damaged cells or debris. For such activation of microglial motilities, extracellular nucleotides have a central role. Extracellular ATP functions as a chemoattractant. Microglial chemotaxis by ATP via P2Y₁₂ receptors was originally found by Honda et al.,⁴ and has recently been confirmed in vivo in P2Y₁₂ receptor knockout animals.⁵ Neuronal injury results in the release or leakage of ATP that appears to be a “find-me” signal from damaged neurons to microglia to cause chemotaxis. In addition to microglial migration by ATP, another nucleotide, UDP, an endogenous agonist of the P2Y₆ receptor, greatly activates the motility of microglia and orders microglia to engulf damaged neurons.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 1P2 purinergic receptors (ATP receptors).Phagocytosis is a specialized form of endocytosis taking relatively large particles (> 1.0 µm) into vacuoles and has a central role in tissue remodeling, inflammation and the defense against infectious agents.⁷ Phagocytosis is initiated by the activation of cell-surface phagocytosis receptors, including Fc receptors, complement receptors, integrins, endotoxin receptors (CD18, CD14), mannose receptors and scavenger receptors⁸ which are activated by corresponding extracellular ligands called as “eat-me” signals. Since recognition is the most important step for phagocytosis, extensive studies on phagocytosis receptors have been reported. With regard to apoptotic cells, it is well known that dying cells express so called “eat-me” signals such as phosphatidylserine (PS) on their surface membrane,⁸ by which microglia recognize the apoptotic cells in order to catch and remove them.⁸ As for amyloid β protein (Aβ), a key molecule that mediates Alzheimer''s disease, microglia remove Aβ presumably via Fc receptor-dependent phagocytosis.^9,10 It, however, is unclear how phagocytotic cells come to the target cells or debris. Our findings suggest that nucleotides might be the molecules to guide phagocytotic cells to the targets.We found that exogenously applied UDP caused microglial phagocytosis through P2Y₆ in a concentration-dependent manner, and that neuronal injury caused by kainic acid (KA) upregulated P2Y₆ receptors in microglia, the KA evoked neuronal injury resulted in an increase in extracellular UTP, which was immediately metabolized into UDP in vivo and in vitro. We also found that UDP leaked from injured neurons caused P2Y₆ receptor-dependent phagocytosis in vivo and in vitro. Thus, UDP could be a diffusible molecule that signals the crisis of damaged neurons to microglia, triggering phagocytosis. Nucleotides seem to have the ability to act as “eat-us” signals for necrotic cells suffering traumatic or ischemic injury because such necrotic cells cause swelling, followed by shrinkage, leading to the leakage of cytoplasmic molecules including a large amount of ATP and UTP and extracellular nucleotides are immediately degraded by ecto-nucleotideases, suggesting that leaked nucleotides could be transient and localized signals that alert to the crisis created by the presence of the necrotic cells. These findings suggest that microglia might be attracted by ATP/ADP^4,5,11,12 and subsequently recognize UDP, starting to recognize “eat-me” signals attached to the targets and engulf them (Fig. 2). It is interesting that ATP/ADP is not able to efficiently activate P2Y₆ receptors, nor can UDP act on P2Y₁₂ receptors. Thus, adenine and uridine nucleotides would regulate microglial motilities, i.e. chemotaxis and phagocytosis, in a coordinated fashion.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Illustration of nucleotide-activated microglial chemotaxix and phagocytosis. Activated microglia might be attracted by ATP/ADP is not able to efficiently activate P2Y6 receptors, nor ca UDP act on P2Y12 receptors.     

Semaphorin Signals on the Road to Cancer Invasion and Metastasis

Semaphorins are a large family of secreted and membrane-bound molecules initially implicated in the development of the nervous system and in axon guidance. More recently, they have been found to regulate cell adhesion and cell motility, angiogenesis, immune function and tumor progression. Notably, Semaphorins have been implicated with opposite functions in cancer: either as putative tumor suppressors and anti-angiogenic factors, or as mediating tumor angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis. Interestingly, Semaphorins may display divergent activities in different cell types. These multifaceted functions may be explained by the involvement of different kinds of semaphorin receptor complexes, and by the consequent activation of multiple signaling pathways, in different cells or different functional stages. Semaphorin signaling is largely mediated by the Plexins. However, semaphorin receptor complexes may also include Neuropilins and tyrosine kinases implicated in cancer. In this review, we will focus on major open questions concerning the potential role of Semaphorin signals in cancer.Key words: semaphorin, plexin, neuropilin, migration, tumor, metastasis, signalingOver twenty different Semaphorin genes are known in vertebrates. They were initially discovered as repelling cues for axons, in the wiring of the neural system. However, they are currently considered versatile signals regulating cell migration, angiogenesis, tissue morphogenesis, immune function and cancer.^1–2 Semaphorins have been implicated with opposite functions in tumor progression (summarized in Fig. 1). For example, Semaphorins 3B and 3F are putative tumor suppressors, while the expression of Semaphorin 3C, 3E and 5C has been associated with tumor invasion and metastasis. Interestingly, certain Semaphorins display divergent activities in different cell types. These varied functions of Semaphorins are likely to be explained by the involvement of different receptor complexes and multiple signaling pathways.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Semaphorin signals on the road to cancer invasion and metastasis. Semaphorins play a regulatory role on the main elements driving cancer progression. They can be seen as “stop” or “go” signals for tumor cells, as well as for stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment. The scheme features some examples of the semaphorin signals implicated so far. More information on the implicated receptors and functional activities of the different semaphorins are summarized in 相似文献   

Forming Patterns in Development without Morphogen Gradients: Scattered Differentiation and Sorting Out

Few mechanisms provide alternatives to morphogen gradients for producing spatial patterns of cells in development. One possibility is based on the sorting out of cells that initially differentiate in a salt and pepper mixture and then physically move to create coherent tissues. Here, we describe the evidence suggesting this is the major mode of patterning in Dictyostelium. In addition, we discuss whether convergent evolution could have produced a conceptually similar mechanism in other organisms.A limited number of processes are thought to regulate the differentiation of specialized cell types and their organization to form larger scale structures, such as organs or limbs, during embryonic development. First, early embryological experiments revealed a patterning process that depends on special “organizing” regions in the embryo. This idea was encapsulated as “positional information” and led to the concept of morphogen gradients (Fig. 1) (Wolpert 1996). In addition, cytoplasmic determinants have been shown to direct development along different lines when they are partitioned unequally between daughter cells by asymmetric cell division (Betschinger and Knoblich 2004). Finally, short-range inductive signaling can specify cells at a local level and when reiterated produces highly ordered structures (Simpson 1990; Freeman 1997; Meinhardt and Gierer 2000).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Alternative ways of patterning cells during development. (A) Patterning by “positional information”: A group of undifferentiated cells is patterned by a morphogen diffusing from a pre-established source, producing a concentration gradient. Cells respond according to the local morphogen concentration, becoming red, white, or blue. (B, C) Patterning without positional information: This is a two-step process in which different cell types first differentiate mixed up with each other, and then sort out. The initial differentiation can be controlled by strictly local interactions between the cells, as in lateral inhibition (B), or by a global signal to which cells respond with different sensitivities and whose concentration they regulate by negative feedback (C). Once sorting has occurred, the global inducer forms a reverse gradient, which could then convey positional information for further patterning events.The question then arises of whether evolution has devised any further global patterning mechanisms. One possibility that has been repeatedly considered, but not firmly established as a general mechanism, is based on sorting out. In this process, pattern is produced in two steps: (1) Different cell types are initially specified from a precursor pool independent of their position to produce a salt and pepper mixture and (2) the mixture of cell types is resolved into discrete tissues by the physical movement and sorting out of the cells (Fig. 1). Consequently, this mechanism does not involve positional information. However, it can actually provide the conditions under which positional signaling and morphogen gradients can arise, if the resolved tissues then act as sources and sinks for signal molecules.We first describe the powerful evidence that this alternative patterning process is used during the developmental cycle of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, and then consider the possibility that this patterning strategy may be used more widely.     

Splenogonadal Fusion: An Unusual Case of an Acute Scrotum

We highlight a case on a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophilic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion. Splenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rather rare entity, with approximately 184 cases reported in the literature. The most comprehensive review was that of 123 cases completed by Carragher in 1990. Since then, an additional 61 cases have been reported in the scientific literature. We have studied these 61 cases in detail and have included a summary of that information here.Key words: Splenogonadal fusion, Acute scrotumA 10-year-old boy presented with worsening left-sided scrotal pain of 12 hours’ duration. The patient reported similar previous episodes occurring intermittently over the past several months. His past medical history was significant for left hip dysplasia, requiring multiple hip surgeries. On examination, he was found to have an edematous left hemiscrotum with a left testicle that was rigid, tender, and noted to be in a transverse lie. The ultrasound revealed possible polyorchism, with two testicles on the left and one on the right (Figure 1), and left epididymitis. One of the left testicles demonstrated a loss of blood flow consistent with testicular torsion (Figure 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Ultrasound of the left hemiscrotum reveals two spherical structures; the one on the left is heterogeneous and hyperdense in comparison to the right.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Doppler ultrasound of left hemiscrotum. No evidence of blood flow to left spherical structure.The patient was taken to the operating room for immediate scrotal exploration. A normalappearing left testicle with a normal epididymis was noted. However, two accessory structures were noted, one of which was torsed 720°; (Figure 3). An inguinal incision was then made and a third accessory structure was noted. All three structures were connected with fibrous tissue, giving a “rosary bead” appearance. The left accessory structures were removed, a left testicular biopsy was taken, and bilateral scrotal orchipexies were performed.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Torsed accessory spleen with splenogonadal fusion.Pathology revealed a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophillic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion (Figure 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4Splenogonadal fusion, continuous type with three accessory structures.     

Gangliosides as High Affinity Receptors for Tetanus Neurotoxin

Tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) is an exotoxin produced by Clostridium tetani that causes paralytic death to hundreds of thousands of humans annually. TeNT cleaves vesicle-associated membrane protein-2, which inhibits neurotransmitter release in the central nervous system to elicit spastic paralysis, but the molecular basis for TeNT entry into neurons remains unclear. TeNT is a ∼150-kDa protein that has AB structure-function properties; the A domain is a zinc metalloprotease, and the B domain encodes a translocation domain and C-terminal receptor-binding domain (HCR/T). Earlier studies showed that HCR/T bound gangliosides via two carbohydrate-binding sites, termed the lactose-binding site (the “W” pocket) and the sialic acid-binding site (the “R” pocket). Here we report that TeNT high affinity binding to neurons is mediated solely by gangliosides. Glycan array and solid phase binding analyses identified gangliosides that bound exclusively to either the W pocket or the R pocket of TeNT; GM1a bound to the W pocket, and GD3 bound to the R pocket. Using these gangliosides and mutated forms of HCR/T that lacked one or both carbohydrate-binding pocket, gangliosides binding to both of the W and R pockets were shown to be necessary for high affinity binding to neuronal and non-neuronal cells. The crystal structure of a ternary complex of HCR/T with sugar components of two gangliosides bound to the W and R supported the binding of gangliosides to both carbohydrate pockets. These data show that gangliosides are functional dual receptors for TeNT.Tetanus is an acute, often fatal disease of humans that was first described by Hippocrates over 24 centuries ago (1). Tetanus is characterized by generalized increased rigidity and convulsive spasms of skeletal muscles. Tetanus is caused by exposure to tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT)³ produced by the spore-forming bacterium Clostridium tetani. TeNT is delivered from the bloodstream to the peripheral nervous system, from where TeNT traffics to the central nervous system to cleave vesicle-associated membrane protein-2 (VAMP2), which inhibits neurotransmitter release and elicits spastic paralysis (2). Although prevented by vaccination, tetanus is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths per year in countries where vaccination is not common (3).TeNT is produced as a ∼150-kDa protein that is cleaved to a di-chain protein, comprising an N-terminal light chain (∼50 kDa) and a C-terminal heavy chain domain (∼100 kDa) linked through a single disulfide bond (4). TeNT light chain is a zinc metalloprotease that cleaves the neuronal SNARE protein VAMP2 (2). The TeNT heavy chain contains two functional domains: a translocation domain and a C-terminal receptor-binding domain (HCR/T, ∼50 kDa).The first step in TeNT action involves binding to a receptor(s) on the presynaptic membrane of α-motor neurons. Although the molecular basis for TeNT entry remains undetermined, an unambiguous role for gangliosides has been demonstrated (5–9). Current models implicate a dual receptor mechanism for the binding of the clostridial neurotoxins to neurons, which includes a ganglioside-binding component (10). Complex gangliosides are sialic acid-containing glycosphingolipids that are located on the outer leaflet of cell membranes and contain a common “core” (GA1) consisting of Gal(β1–3)GalNAc(β1–4)Gal(β1–4)Glc(β1–1)Cer to which one or more N-acetylneuraminic acids (sialic acids) are bound, yielding “a” and “b” series gangliosides (11, 12). Numerous structural and biochemical studies have established that HCR/T contains two carbohydrate-binding sites: a lactose-binding site and a sialic acid-binding site (13). Previous studies showed that Trp¹²⁸⁹ is the key residue for the lactose-binding site, and Arg¹²²⁶ is the key residue for the sialic acid-binding site (14). In this study, we denote the lactose-binding site as the “W” pocket and the sialic acid-binding site as the “R” pocket. Binz and co-workers (14) showed that functional R and W binding sites were required for TeNT toxicity (7). These biochemical and cellular studies were supported by a co-crystal structure of HCR/T bound to a GT1b-β anomer analog, which showed that the W and R carbohydrate-binding pockets were located at different regions of TeNT (7). We recently reported that the W pocket binds gangliosides via the GA1 core structure, whereas the R pocket binds gangliosides via di- or tri-sialic acid moieties (15) where simultaneous binding of TeNT to two gangliosides was synergistic (see Fig. 1a). In the current study, gangliosides were identified that bound exclusively to either the W pocket or R pocket, which allowed the characterization of the role of ganglioside binding to the W and R pockets as dual receptors for TeNT entry into neurons.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Interaction of the HCR domain of TeNT with its putative cellular receptor. a, HCR/T has two ganglioside-binding sites. The W pocket binds to the terminal GalNAc-Gal of the ganglioside (illustrated by GM1a). The R pocket binds to the di-sialic acid of the ganglioside (illustrated by GD3). b, alternating lanes of molecular mass marker proteins and cortical neuron lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was stained for protein with Ponceau S (bottom panel), and then the membrane strips were incubated with 10 nm of the indicated HCR/T (HCR/T wild type (wt), HCR/T (R+, W−), HCR/T (R−, W+), or HCR/T (R−, W−)) followed by HRP-conjugated α-FLAG antibody. The bands were visualized with SuperSignal; exposed film is shown (upper panel). The asterisk denotes the position of purified gangliosides resolved under identical conditions. Migration of the molecular mass marker proteins is indicated (kDa) in the left-most lane in the upper panel.     

Women in cell biology: a seat at the table and a place at the podium

The Women in Cell Biology (WICB) committee of the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) was started in the 1970s in response to the documented underrepresentation of women in academia in general and cell biology in particular. By coincidence or causal relationship, I am happy to say that since WICB became a standing ASCB committee, women have been well represented in ASCB''s leadership and as symposium speakers at the annual meeting. However, the need to provide opportunities and information useful to women in developing their careers in cell biology is still vital, given the continuing bias women face in the larger scientific arena. With its emphasis on mentoring, many of WICB''s activities benefit the development of both men and women cell biologists. The WICB “Career Column” in the monthly ASCB Newsletter is a source of accessible wisdom. At the annual ASCB meeting, WICB organizes the career discussion and mentoring roundtables, childcare awards, Mentoring Theater, career-related panel and workshop, and career recognition awards. Finally, the WICB Speaker Referral Service provides a list of outstanding women whom organizers of scientific meetings, scientific review panels, and university symposia/lecture series can reach out to when facing the proverbial dilemma, “I just don''t know any women who are experts.”Although women are approaching parity in earning PhD and MD degrees, studies of their underrepresentation in academia, as principal investigators in funded science and in leadership positions, have led to the conclusion that gender schemas (Valian, 1999 ) work against women and diminish their success. This picture is supported by the National Academy of Sciences’ (NAS) report Beyond Bias and Barriers, which concludes that “Neither our academic institutions nor our nation can afford such underuse of precious human capital in science and engineering” (NAS, 2007 ) A New Yorker cartoon captures the scene at too many scientific gatherings (Figure 1).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1:“The subject of tonight''s discussion is: Why are there no women on this panel?” Cartoon by David Sipress from The New Yorker Collection, www.cartoonbank.com. Used under Rights Managed License. Copyright holder Conde Nast.The Women in Cell Biology (WICB) committee was started in the early 1970s with notices of ad hoc meetings posted in women''s washrooms during the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) annual meeting and a mimeographed newsletter (Williams, 1996a , 1996b ). One goal for WICB''s “founding mothers” was to achieve more equitable representation as participants within ASCB, including more accurate representation of women within the ASCB leadership and as speakers. Consonant with this goal, WICB was delighted to become a standing committee of the ASCB in 1992. In the 30 years prior to this watershed date, only 13% of ASCB presidents were women. Since 1992, 50% of ASCB presidents have been women. I cannot determine whether this is causal, reflective of a third variable, or pure coincidence. But it is remarkable.The number of women leaders and speakers within ASCB suggests that WICB''s initial goal of more accurate representation of women has been largely achieved. However, the goals of helping women cell biologists successfully juggle career and family, find mentors, and achieve gender equity in job placement continue to be challenges. We have developed multiple WICB-sponsored activities throughout the year, and especially at the annual ASCB meeting, to give cell biologists tools with which to meet these challenges.     

Understanding the Structure and Function of the Immunological Synapse

The immunological synapse has been an area of very active scientific interest over the last decade. Surprisingly, much about the synapse remains unknown or is controversial.  Here we review some of these current issues in the field:  how the synapse is defined, its potential role in T-cell function, and our current understanding about how the synapse is formed.T cells are activated when they recognize peptide-MHC complexes on the surface of antigen presenting cells (APC) (Babbitt et al. 1985). But the exact process regarding how antigenic pMHC complexes are recognized and transduced into signals is still incompletely understood. Naïve T cells enter secondary lymphoid organs such as the lymph node and scan dendritic cells for the presence of rare specific pMHC complexes (Miller et al. 2004). After recognizing less than 10 specific pMHC complexes, naïve T cells maintain long contacts (6–18 h) with dendritic cells before being committed to enter cell cycle and differentiate into effector T cells (Iezzi et al. 1998; Irvine et al. 2002; Mempel et al. 2004).The immunological synapse (IS) refers to the organization of membrane proteins that occurs at the interface between the T cell and the APC during these long contacts and also during the effector phase (Grakoui et al. 1999; Monks et al. 1998). Interest in studying the IS stems from ideas that the supramolecular structures that form at the IS underlies the high sensitivity of T cell recognition and that understanding these structures will lead to better insights into how antigen recognition leads to the decision of a T cell to proliferate, differentiate, and function.Springer first put forward the concept that receptors would segregate laterally during cell interactions (Springer 1990). Subsequently, Kupfer was the first to show that proteins in the contact area between a T cell and APC segregate laterally (Monks et al. 1998). Specifically, he noted that the integrin, LFA-1, became concentrated in an outer ring, known as the peripheral supramolecular activation complex (pSMAC) and the TCR became concentrated in the center, in a zone known as the central supramolecular activation complex (cSMAC) (Monks et al. 1998)(Fig. 1). We showed that CD2 could segregate from LFA-1 and concentrate in the center of a hybrid cell-planar bilayer junction and suggested that these patterns and those described by Monks et al. (1998) provided evidence for the previously hypothesized immunological synapse (Dustin et al. 1998; Norcross 1984). The function of this receptor segregation is still not completely understood but it was initially hypothesized that formation of this pattern might be related to T-cell activation and constitute a “molecular machine” that would be formed in response to the presence of antigenic ligand and that this “molecular machine” might function to sustain signaling for long periods of time and direct subsequent T-cell differentiation (Grakoui et al. 1999).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Structure of the immunological synapse. The basic structure of the “organized” immunological synapse with SMACs is shown (left). In the center is the central supramolecular activation complex or cSMAC, which contains receptors like the TCR, CD28, CD4, CD8, and CD2. Newer studies suggest that the cSMAC may be divided into an outer area containing CD28 and an inner area containing the TCR (not shown). The ring that surrounds the cSMAC is called the peripheral supramolecular activation complex or pSMAC. This domain is mainly populated by the integrin molecule LFA-1. Outside of the pSMAC is another domain known as the distal supramolecular activation complex. Originally the dSMAC was thought not be important and contain all of the molecules that are not specifically recruited to the cSMAC or pSMAC but it is increasingly becoming appreciated that the dSMAC is an area of active membrane movement. This suggests that the pSMAC and dSMAC may be analogous to the actin structures known as the lamellae and lamellipodia, respectively (right).     

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Lamina-specific Axon Targeting

The specificity of synaptic connections is directly related to the functional integrity of neural circuits. Long-range axon guidance and topographic mapping mechanisms bring axons into spatial proximity of target cells and thus limit the number of potential synaptic partners. Synaptic specificity is then achieved by extracellular short-range guidance cues and cell-surface recognition cues. Neural activity may enhance the precision and strength of specific circuit connections. Here, we focus on one of the final steps of synaptic matchmaking: the targeting of synaptic layers and the mutual recognition of axons and dendrites within these layers.Perception and behavior are critically dependent on synaptic communication between specific neurons. Understanding how neurons achieve such “synaptic specificity” is therefore one of the most fundamental issues in developmental neuroscience. Langley’s notion of “chemical relations” between synaptically connected neurons (Langley 1892) and Sperry’s “chemoaffinity” hypothesis (Sperry 1963) provided a conceptual framework for the development of precise synaptic connections in the central nervous system. Sperry postulated that molecular interactions between neurons and their extracellular environment (including between and amongst axons and dendrites) ensure that connections form only between “appropriate” synaptic partners (Sperry 1963). This hypothesis has been confirmed by experimental work over the last four decades, most importantly by the identification of molecular cues that provide synaptic specificity (see Sanes and Yamagata 2009 for a recent comprehensive review). However, within this broad framework, a number of alternate mechanisms have been shown or proposed to play roles in specific aspects of such targeting processes. Here, we focus on mechanisms that underlie the formation of synaptic layers, a prominent anatomical feature of the visual system as well as many other areas of the CNS.As reviewed previously (O''Leary 2010), the chemoaffinity principle underlies the developmental process of topographic mapping. Indeed, the precision with which neurons preserve the spatial relationships between the visual world and its representation in the brain is remarkable: Across animals ranging from flies to vertebrates, axons that bear signals from adjacent points in visual space invariably choose adjacent targets in the brain (Braitenberg 1967; Lemke and Reber 2005; Sperry 1963). Thus, position-dependent guidance of axons ensures that a visuotopic map develops. However, position in space is just one attribute of a visual stimulus; others include color, brightness, edge detection, and movement. If position in visual space is encoded by localized activation within a two-dimensional field of neurons, then these other features are encoded by local circuits that act both in series and in parallel and are reiterated many times across the field (Fig. 1). These local circuit modules are often envisioned as “columns” that lie orthogonal to the topographic map, with each column corresponding to a pixel in visual space and each level of the column representing a different, specific visual feature within that pixel, such as brightness, color, etc. (Fig. 1). How these columns acquire their laminated structure represents a developmental challenge of extraordinary scale. Although long-range axon guidance and topographic mapping no doubt contribute to restricting the astronomical number of potential synaptic partners, these mechanisms are clearly not sufficient; additional mechanisms must (and do) exist that act on a local scale to provide an additional level of positional information and cell-type-specific “chemoaffinity.”Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Laminae are a fundamental organizing unit of neural circuits. Each column corresponds to a single topographic position (e.g., location on the retina). Within each column, different cell types (shown type A: blue, and type B: red) respond to different features in the visual world, such as motion or luminance. These pixels are repeated many times over and thus cover all of visual space. A simple rule of “Cell type A connects to Layer A, etc.” ensures that functional segregation is maintained in the connections from the retina to the target (parallel processing). Each pixel P1, P2, and P3 connects to a single column (C1, C2, and C3), establishing serial processing. Within each column, there are local circuits that, too, are layer-specific. Thus, laminae ensure functional specificity of both afferent-target connections and local circuit connections.A prominent principle, which guides the formation of connections between specific cell types and is a characteristic feature of CNS architecture, is the concentration of synapses in small areas. These synapse clusters can take the form of planar layers or spherical glomeruli. Although glomeruli are a specialization that appears most prominent in the olfactory system, layers, or laminae, are an almost ubiquitous feature of central nervous system architecture. Indeed, even crude histological stains reveal that axons and dendrites often accumulate in neuropil (cell-body-free areas). Cell-type-specific or single-cell labeling has shown that, within individual neuropil layers, neurites and synapses are not distributed randomly. Rather, synaptic connections arising between neurons with the same or similar functional properties are localized to particular sublaminae that distinguish synapses with different properties (Fig. 1). The structural underpinnings of this functional principle are provided by mechanisms that ensure the lamina-specific branching of the corresponding neurites. How this enormous precision is achieved is the subject of intense investigations in the Drosophila, zebrafish, chick, and mouse visual systems. We will begin by describing three anatomical regions in these model organisms. Then, we will discuss three broad principles of layer-specific targeting in the visual system, namely cell–cell recognition, guidance by matrix cues, and activity-dependent sorting of axon terminals.     

The Structure and Function of Bacterial Actin Homologs

During the past decade, the appreciation and understanding of how bacterial cells can be organized in both space and time have been revolutionized by the identification and characterization of multiple bacterial homologs of the eukaryotic actin cytoskeleton. Some of these bacterial actins, such as the plasmid-borne ParM protein, have highly specialized functions, whereas other bacterial actins, such as the chromosomally encoded MreB protein, have been implicated in a wide array of cellular activities. In this review we cover our current understanding of the structure, assembly, function, and regulation of bacterial actins. We focus on ParM as a well-understood reductionist model and on MreB as a central organizer of multiple aspects of bacterial cell biology. We also discuss the outstanding puzzles in the field and possible directions where this fast-developing area may progress in the future.The discovery of cytoskeletal proteins in bacteria has fundamentally altered our understanding of the organization and evolution of bacteria as cells. Homologs of eukaryotic actin represent the most molecularly and functionally diverse family of bacterial cytoskeletal elements. Recent phylogenetic studies have identified more than 20 subgroups of bacterial actin homologs (Derman et al. 2009) (Fig. 1). Many of these bacterial actins are encoded on extrachromosomal plasmids, but most bacterial species with nonspherical morphologies also encode chromosomal actin homologs (Daniel and Errington 2003). The two earliest proteins to be characterized as bacterial actins were the chromosomal protein MreB (Jones et al. 2001) and the plasmidic protein ParM (Jensen and Gerdes 1997). MreB and ParM remain the best-characterized of the bacterial actins and we will thus focus on these two proteins for most of this article.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The superfamily of bacterial actin homologs. Shown is a phylogenetic tree of the bacterial actin subfamilies that have been identified to date based on sequence homology. The subfamilies that have been experimentally shown to polymerize are labeled and colored. (Courtesy of Joe Pogliano, based on Derman et al. 2009.)The appreciation that bacteria possess actin homologs only occurred in the past decade. MreB was first identified as a protein involved in cell shape regulation in Escherichia coli in the late 1980s (Doi et al. 1988). In the early 1990s, pioneering bioinformatic studies identified similarities in a group of ATPases that have five conserved motifs (Bork et al. 1992), a feature dubbed the actin superfamily fold. Although this group includes actin and MreB, it also contains proteins that do not polymerize into filaments, such as sugar kinases like hexokinase and chaperones like Hsp70. A number of bacterial proteins are present in the actin superfamily, including the bacterial cell division protein FtsA which interacts with the tubulin homolog FtsZ and may or may not form filaments in different contexts (van den Ent and Lowe 2000). Because MreB did not appear significantly more related to actin than these nonfilamentous proteins, the weak sequence similarity with actin was largely ignored for the better part of a decade. This changed in 2001 when two seminal papers showed that Bacillus subtilis MreB forms cytoskeletal filaments in vivo (Jones et al. 2001) and that Thermotoga maritima MreB forms cytoskeletal filaments in vitro (van den Ent et al. 2001). Indeed, structural and biochemical studies of both MreB and ParM have convincingly showed that these proteins closely resemble actin and polymerize into linear filaments in a nucleotide-dependent manner (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Structures of F-actin (Holmes et al. 1990), MreB (van den Ent et al. 2001), and ParM (van den Ent et al. 2002). (Left) Structures of F-actin filaments (PDB entry 1YAG). (Second from the left) MreB filaments from T. maritima (PDB entry 1JCE). (Center) ParM:ADP monomer in the “closed” conformation. (Second from the right) apo ParM monomer in the “open” conformation. (Right) ParM filament. Shown are the position of the nucleotide within the interdomain cleft, the conservation of fold, and the axis of the protofilament extension (arrow). Note that the conformational change shown for ParM from the “open” to “closed” state is predicted for all actin homologs. (Adapted, with permission from, Michie and Löwe 2006.)Research following the identification of bacterial cytoskeletal proteins has focused on understanding their assembly, regulation, and function. Here, we will summarize our current understanding of these issues and highlight the outstanding questions. We will begin with ParM, whose well-characterized assembly and dynamics represent a model for future studies of all cytoskeletal proteins. We will then focus on MreB, whose diverse activities appear to be central to the cell biology of many bacterial species.     

Polarity in Stem Cell Division: Asymmetric Stem Cell Division in Tissue Homeostasis

Many adult stem cells divide asymmetrically to balance self-renewal and differentiation, thereby maintaining tissue homeostasis. Asymmetric stem cell divisions depend on asymmetric cell architecture (i.e., cell polarity) within the cell and/or the cellular environment. In particular, as residents of the tissues they sustain, stem cells are inevitably placed in the context of the tissue architecture. Indeed, many stem cells are polarized within their microenvironment, or the stem cell niche, and their asymmetric division relies on their relationship with the microenvironment. Here, we review asymmetric stem cell divisions in the context of the stem cell niche with a focus on Drosophila germ line stem cells, where the nature of niche-dependent asymmetric stem cell division is well characterized.Asymmetric cell division allows stem cells to self-renew and produce another cell that undergoes differentiation, thus providing a simple method for tissue homeostasis. Stem cell self-renewal refers to the daughter(s) of stem cell division maintaining all stem cell characteristics, including proliferation capacity, maintenance of the undifferentiated state, and the capability to produce daughter cells that undergo differentiation. A failure to maintain the correct stem cell number has been speculated to lead to tumorigenesis/tissue hyperplasia via stem cell hyperproliferation or tissue degeneration/aging via a reduction in stem cell number or activity (Morrison and Kimble 2006; Rando 2006). This necessity changes during development. The stem cell pool requires expansion earlier in development, whereas maintenance is needed later to sustain tissue homeostasis.There are two major mechanisms to sustain a fixed number of adult stem cells: stem cell niche and asymmetric stem cell division, which are not mutually exclusive. Stem cell niche is a microenvironment in which stem cells reside, and provides essential signals required for stem cell identity (Fig. 1A). Physical limitation of niche “space” can therefore define stem cell number within a tissue. Within such a niche, many stem cells divide asymmetrically, giving rise to one stem cell and one differentiating cell, by placing one daughter inside and another outside of the niche, respectively (Fig. 1A). Nevertheless, some stem cells divide asymmetrically, apparently without the niche. For example, in Drosophila neuroblasts, cell-intrinsic fate determinants are polarized within a dividing cell, and subsequent partitioning of such fate determinants into daughter cells in an asymmetric manner results in asymmetric stem cell division (Fig. 1B) (see Fig. 3A and Prehoda 2009).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. (A) Asymmetric stem cell division by extrinsic fate determinants (i.e., the stem cell niche). The two daughters of stem cell division will be placed in distinct cellular environments either inside or outside the stem cell niche, leading to asymmetric fate choice. (B) Asymmetric stem cell division by intrinsic fate determinants. Fate determinants are polarized in the dividing stem cells, which are subsequently partitioned into two daughter cells unequally, thus making the division asymmetrical. Self-renewing (red line) and/or differentiation promoting (green line) factors may be involved.In this review, we focus primarily on asymmetric stem cell divisions in the Drosophila germ line as the most intensively studied examples of niche-dependent asymmetric stem cell division. We also discuss some examples of stem cell division outside Drosophila, where stem cells are known to divide asymmetrically or in a niche-dependent manner.     

Clearing the Dead: Apoptotic Cell Sensing,Recognition, Engulfment,and Digestion

Clearance of apoptotic cells is the final stage of programmed cell death. Uncleared corpses can become secondarily necrotic, promoting inflammation and autoimmunity. Remarkably, even in tissues with high cellular turnover, apoptotic cells are rarely seen because of efficient clearance mechanisms in healthy individuals. Recently, significant progress has been made in understanding the steps involved in prompt cell clearance in vivo. These include the sensing of corpses via “find me” signals, the recognition of corpses via “eat me” signals and their cognate receptors, the signaling pathways that regulate cytoskeletal rearrangement necessary for engulfment, and the responses of the phagocyte that keep cell clearance events “immunologically silent.” This study focuses on our understanding of these steps.Multicellular organisms execute the majority of unwanted cell populations in a regulated fashion via the process of apoptosis (Henson and Hume 2006; Nagata et al. 2010). Examples of unwanted cells include excess cells generated during development, cells infected with intracellular bacteria or viruses, transformed or malignant cells capable of tumorigenesis, and cells irreparably damaged by cytotoxic agents. Swift removal of these cells is necessary for maintenance of overall health and homeostasis and prevention of autoimmunity, pathogen burden, or cancer. Quick removal of dying cells is a key final step, if not the ultimate goal of the apoptotic program.The term “phagocytosis” refers to an internalization process by which larger particles, such as bacteria and dead/dying cells, are engulfed and processed within a membrane-bound vesicle called the phagosome (Ravichandran and Lorenz 2007). A phagocyte is any cell that is capable of engulfment, including “professional” phagocytes such as macrophages, immature dendritic cells, and neutrophils. Metazoa have multiple mechanisms for clearing apoptotic cells, often depending on the tissue and apoptotic cell type (Gregory 2009). Macrophages and immature dendritic cells readily engulf dead or dying cells in tissues such as bone marrow (where a large number of new hematopoietic cells are generated), spleen (during or after an immune response), and the thymus (in young animals during T-lymphocyte development). In other tissues, neighboring “nonprofessional” phagocytes can also mediate the clearance of apoptotic targets. For example, in the mammary epithelium, viable mammary epithelial cells engulf apoptotic mammary epithelial cells after cessation of lactation (Monks et al. 2005, 2008). What distinguishes the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells from the phagocytosis of most bacteria or necrotic cells is the lack of a pro-inflammatory immune response (Henson 2005). This article discusses apoptotic cell engulfment, specifically the recruitment of phagocytes, through “find me” signals, the recognition of apoptotic cells by phagocytes via “eat me” signals, the internalization process and signaling pathways used for cytoskeletal rearrangement, and finally the digestion of apoptotic cells and phagocytic response to this process (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The steps of efficient apoptotic cell clearance. First, “find me” signals released by apoptotic cells are recognized via their cognate receptors on the surface of phagocytes. This is the sensing stage and stimulates phagocyte migration to the location of apoptotic cells. Second, phagocytes recognize exposed “eat me” signals on the surface of apoptotic cells via their phagocytic receptors, which leads to downstream signaling events culminating in Rac activation. Finally, further signaling events within the phagocyte regulate the digestion and processing of the apoptotic cell meal and the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines.     

Cellular Polarity in Prokaryotic Organisms

Simple visual inspection of bacteria indicated that, at least in some otherwise symmetric cells, structures such as flagella were often seen at a single pole. Because these structures are composed of proteins, it was not clear how to reconcile these observations of morphological asymmetry with the widely held view of bacteria as unstructured “bags of enzymes.” However, over the last decade, numerous GFP tagged proteins have been found at specific intracellular locations such as the poles of the cells, indicating that bacteria have a high degree of intracellular organization. Here we will explore the role of chromosomal asymmetry and the presence of “new” and “old” poles that result from the cytokinesis of rod-shaped cells in establishing bipolar and monopolar protein localization patterns. This article is intended to be illustrative, not exhaustive, so we have focused on examples drawn largely from Caulobacter crescentus and Bacillus subtilis, two bacteria that undergo dramatic morphological transformation. We will highlight how breaking monopolar symmetry is essential for the correct development of these organisms.Although prokaryotes with dramatic, colorful stripes such as Blake''s “tygers” have not been seen, many bacteria found in nature show morphological polarity (Young 2006). This could simply be a consequence of the elaborations of bacterial cellular architecture, akin to the famous decorative but not structurally essential Spandrels in the Basilica di San Marco in Venice that are a side-effect of an adaptation, rather than a direct product of natural selection (Gould and Lewontin 1979). However, it is more likely that this polarity can be traced to a particular function in cellular physiology. An example is the ActA protein of Listeria monocytogenes that is localized at a single bacterial pole (Theriot et al. 1992; Goldberg and Theriot 1995). The interaction between ActA and the Arp2/3 complex induces actin filament formation at that pole and therefore serves to propel the bacterium (Loisel et al. 1999). In this article, we will address the mechanisms underlying such asymmetric protein distributions.At least two aspects of prokaryotic cell physiology are intrinsically polar. First, cytokinesis in rod-shaped organisms occurs typically in the middle, so cells have an “old” pole and a “new” pole. Even in cells with a coccoid (round) morphology, the two hemispheres have different ages. At a molecular level, the poles are zones of inert peptidoglycan (Fig. 1A) resulting from the absence of new synthesis (de Pedro et al. 1997). Thus, the differential age of a pole could be reflected in its differential “inertness.” Because surface exposed proteins can become immobilized in these zones (de Pedro et al. 2004), these proteins could serve as landmarks for the establishment of morphological structures. However, few demonstrations of an interaction between peptidoglycan and a protein that result in a particular pattern of protein localization have been reported, so this mechanism remains largely hypothetical. A second basis for intrinsic polarity derives from the asymmetry of the haploid bacterial chromosome (Rocha 2008). Because bacterial chromosomes have a stereotypical layout within the bacterial cell and genes are located in either origin proximal or original distal positions, genetic loci have a defined spatial distribution (Teleman et al. 1998; Viollier et al. 2004; Berlatzky et al. 2008) that could serve as a template to direct asymmetric protein localization (Fig. 1B). Although this mechanism is appealing, not least for its simplicity, the colocalization of genes and their encoded proteins remains largely speculative (Norris et al. 2007). As discussed in more detail in the following, however, the chromosomal position of two genes necessary for cell fate determination in B. subtilis does play an important role in the activity of their respective proteins.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Intrinsic polarity in bacteria. (A) The poles of rod shaped cells are zones of inert peptidoglycan. D-Cys-labeled Escherichia coli was chased in the absence of label for two mass doubling times. White indicates labeled, stable murein; black indicates unlabeled, presumably recently inserted murein. Illustration provided by Anu Janakiraman. (B) Asymmetric orientation of bacterial chromosomes. Origins of replication are red, termini of replication are blue, and the replisome is green. (Left) The haploid bacterial B. subtilis or E. coli chromosomes are orientated in slow growing cells with the origin located near one pole and the terminus located near the other pole. (Middle) During sporulation in B. subtilis, the chromosome is initially bisected by the asymmetric septum, resulting in a period of transient genetic asymmetry before completion of translocation. (Right) Chromosome replication in C. crescentus initiates at one pole, followed by transit of the newly replicated origin to the other pole.Because most prokaryotes show at least one of these kinds of cellular polarity, the question becomes how do proteins become asymmetrically localized within the cell? Proteins can localize to one or both poles, to the mid-cell, or to helices spanning the length of the cell (Graumann 2007). Here, we will explore how some of these patterns are established and then focus on their function in cellular physiology.     

Gap Junctions

Gap junctions are aggregates of intercellular channels that permit direct cell–cell transfer of ions and small molecules. Initially described as low-resistance ion pathways joining excitable cells (nerve and muscle), gap junctions are found joining virtually all cells in solid tissues. Their long evolutionary history has permitted adaptation of gap-junctional intercellular communication to a variety of functions, with multiple regulatory mechanisms. Gap-junctional channels are composed of hexamers of medium-sized families of integral proteins: connexins in chordates and innexins in precordates. The functions of gap junctions have been explored by studying mutations in flies, worms, and humans, and targeted gene disruption in mice. These studies have revealed a wide diversity of function in tissue and organ biology.Gap junctions are clusters of intercellular channels that allow direct diffusion of ions and small molecules between adjacent cells. The intercellular channels are formed by head-to-head docking of hexameric assemblies (connexons) of tetraspan integral membrane proteins, the connexins (Cx) (Goodenough et al. 1996). These channels cluster into polymorphic maculae or plaques containing a few to thousands of units (Fig. 1). The close membrane apposition required to allow the docking between connexons sterically excludes most other membrane proteins, leaving a narrow ∼2 nm extracellular “gap” for which the junction is named (Fig. 2). Gap junctions in prechordates are composed of innexins (Phelan et al. 1998; Phelan 2005). In chordates, connexins arose by convergent evolution (Alexopoulos et al. 2004), to expand by gene duplication (Cruciani and Mikalsen 2007) into a 21-member gene family. Three innexin-related proteins, called pannexins, have persisted in vertebrates, although it is not clear if they form intercellular channels (Panchin et al. 2000; Bruzzone et al. 2003). 7Å-resolution electron crystallographic structures of intercellular channels composed of either a carboxy-terminal truncation of Cx43 (Unger et al. 1999; Yeager and Harris 2007) or an M34A mutant of Cx26 (Oshima et al. 2007) are available. The overall pore morphologies are similar with the exception of a “plug” in the Cx26 channel pore. The density of this plug is substantively decreased by deletion of amino acids 2–7, suggesting that the amino-terminus contributes to this structure (Oshima et al. 2008). A 3.5-Å X-ray crystallographic structure has visualized the amino-terminus of Cx26 folded into the mouth of the channel without forming a plug, thought to be an image of the open channel conformation (Maeda et al. 2009). The amino-terminus has been physiologically implicated in voltage-gating of the Cx26 and Cx32 channels (Purnick et al. 2000; Oh et al. 2004), lending support to a role for the amino-terminus as a gating structure. However, Cx43 also shows voltage-gating, and its lack of any structure resembling a plug remains unresolved. A comparison of a 1985 intercellular channel structure (Makowski 1985) with the 2009 3.5Å structure (Maeda et al. 2009) summarizes a quarter-century of X-ray progress (Fig. 3).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.A diagram showing the multiple levels of gap junction structure. Individual connexins assemble intracellularly into hexamers, called connexons, which then traffic to the cell surface. There, they dock with connexons in an adjacent cell, assembling an axial channel spanning two plasma membranes and a narrow extracellular “gap.”Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Electron microscopy of gap junctions joining adjacent hepatocytes in the mouse. The gap junction (GJ) is seen as an area of close plasma membrane apposition, clearly distinct from the tight junction (TJ) joining these cells. (Inset A) A high magnification view of the gap junction revealing the 2–3 nm “gap” (white arrows) separating the plasma membranes. (Inset B) A freeze-fracture replica of a gap junction showing the characteristic particles on the protoplasmic (P) fracture face and pits on the ectoplasmic (E) fracture face. The particles and pits show considerable disorder in their packing with an average 9-nm center-to-center spacing.Open in a separate windowFigure 3.A comparison of axial sections through gap-junction structures deduced from X-ray diffraction. The 1985 data (Makowski 1985) were acquired from gap junctions isolated biochemically from mouse liver containing mixtures of Cx32 and Cx26. The intercellular channel (CHANNEL) is blocked at the two cytoplasmic surfaces by electron density at the channel mouths along the sixfold symmetry axis. The 2009 data (Maeda et al. 2009), acquired from three-dimensional crystals of recombinant Cx26, resolve this density at the channel opening as the amino-termini of the connexin proteins, the 2009 model possibly showing an open channel structure.Most cells express multiple connexins. These may co-oligomerize into the same (homomeric) or mixed (heteromeric) connexons, although only certain combinations are permitted (Falk et al. 1997; Segretain and Falk 2004). A connexon may dock with an identical connexon to form a homotypic intercellular channel or with a connexon containing different connexins to form a heterotypic channel (Dedek et al. 2006). Although only some assembly combinations are permitted (White et al. 1994), the number of possible different intercellular channels formed by this 21-member family is astonishingly large. This diversity has significance because intercellular channels composed of different connexins have different physiological properties, including single-channel conductances and multiple conductance states (Takens-Kwak and Jongsma 1992), as well as permeabilities to experimental tracers (Elfgang et al. 1995) and to biologically relevant permeants (Gaunt and Subak-Sharpe 1979; Veenstra et al. 1995; Bevans et al. 1998; Gong and Nicholson 2001; Goldberg et al. 2002; Ayad et al. 2006; Harris 2007).Opening of extrajunctional connexons in the plasma membrane, described as “hemichannel” activity, can be experimentally induced in a variety of cell types. Because first observations of hemichannel activity were in an oocyte expression system (Paul et al. 1991) and dissociated retinal horizontal cells (DeVries and Schwartz 1992), the possible functions of hemichannels composed of connexins and pannexins has enjoyed vigorous investigation (Goodenough and Paul 2003; Bennett et al. 2003; Locovei et al. 2006; Evans et al. 2006; Srinivas et al. 2007; Schenk et al. 2008; Thompson and MacVicar 2008; Anselmi et al. 2008; Goodenough and Paul 2003). Hemichannels have been implicated in various forms of paracrine signaling, for example in providing a pathway for extracellular release of ATP (Cotrina et al. 1998; Kang et al. 2008), glutamate (Ye et al. 2003), NAD⁺ (Bruzzone et al. 2000), and prostaglandins (Jiang and Cherian 2003).     

The Pks13/FadD32 Crosstalk for the Biosynthesis of Mycolic Acids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The last steps of the biosynthesis of mycolic acids, essential and specific lipids of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and related bacteria, are catalyzed by proteins encoded by the fadD32-pks13-accD4 cluster. Here, we produced and purified an active form of the Pks13 polyketide synthase, with a phosphopantetheinyl (P-pant) arm at both positions Ser-55 and Ser-1266 of its two acyl carrier protein (ACP) domains. Combination of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry of protein tryptic digests and radiolabeling experiments showed that, in vitro, the enzyme specifically loads long-chain 2-carboxyacyl-CoA substrates onto the P-pant arm of its C-terminal ACP domain via the acyltransferase domain. The acyl-AMPs produced by the FadD32 enzyme are specifically transferred onto the ketosynthase domain after binding to the P-pant moiety of the N-terminal ACP domain of Pks13 (N-ACP_Pks13). Unexpectedly, however, the latter step requires the presence of active FadD32. Thus, the couple FadD32-(N-ACP_Pks13) composes the initiation module of the mycolic condensation system. Pks13 ultimately condenses the two loaded fatty acyl chains to produce α-alkyl β-ketoacids, the precursors of mycolic acids. The developed in vitro assay will constitute a strategic tool for antimycobacterial drug screening.Mycolic acids, α-branched and β-hydroxylated fatty acids of unusual chain length (C30-C90), are the hallmark of the Corynebacterineae suborder that includes the causative agents of tuberculosis (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) and leprosy (Mycobacterium leprae). Members of each genus biosynthesize mycolic acids of specific chain lengths, a feature used in taxonomy. For example, Corynebacterium holds the simplest prototypes (C32-C36), called “corynomycolic acids,” which result from an enzymatic condensation between two regular size fatty acids (C16–C18). In contrast, the longest mycolates (C60-C90) are the products of condensation between a very long meromycolic chain (C40-C60) and a shorter α-chain (C22-C26) (1). These so-called “eumycolic acids” are found in mycobacteria and display various structural features present on the meromycolic chain. Eumycolic acids are major and essential components of the mycobacterial envelope where they contribute to the formation of the outer membrane (2, 3) that plays a crucial role in the permeability of the envelope. They also impact on the pathogenicity of some mycobacterial species (4).The first in vitro mycolate biosynthesis assays have been developed using Corynebacterium cell-wall extracts in the presence of a radioactive precursor (5, 6) and have brought key information about this pathway. Yet, any attempt to fractionate these extracts to identify the proteins involved has ended in failure. Later, enzymes catalyzing the formation of the meromycolic chain and the introduction of functions have been discovered with the help of novel molecular biology tools (for review, see Ref. 1), culminating with the identification of the putative operon fadD32-pks13-accD4 that encodes enzymes implicated in the mycolic condensation step in both corynebacteria and mycobacteria (see Fig. 1) (7–9). AccD4, a putative carboxyltransferase, associates at least with the AccA3 subunit to form an acyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC)³ complex that most likely activates, through a C₂-carboxylation step, the extender unit to be condensed with the meromycolic chain (see Fig. 1). In Corynebacterium glutamicum, the carboxylase would metabolize a C16 substrate (8, 10), whereas in M. tuberculosis the purified complex AccA3-AccD4 was shown to carboxylate C24-C26 acyl-CoAs (11). Furthermore, FadD32, predicted to belong to a new class of long-chain acyl-AMP ligases (FAAL) (12), is most likely required for the activation of the meromycolic chain prior to the condensation reaction. At last, the cmrA gene controls the reduction of the β-keto function to yield the final mycolic motif (13) (see Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Proposed scheme for the biosynthesis of mycolic acids. The asymmetrical carbons of the mycolic motif have a R,R configuration. R₁-CO, meromycolic chain; R₂, branch chain. In mycobacteria, R₁-CO = C40-C60 and R₂ = C20-C24; in corynebacteria, R₁-CO = C16-C18 and R₂ = C14-C16; X₁, unknown acceptor of the mycolic α-alkyl β-ketoacyl chains; X₂, unknown acceptor of the mycolic acyl chains.Although the enzymatic properties of the ACC complex have been well characterized (9, 11), those of Pks13 and FadD32 are poorly or not described. Pks13 is a type I polyketide synthase (PKS) made of a minimal module holding ketosynthase (KS), acyltransferase (AT), and acyl carrier protein (ACP) domains, and additional N-terminal ACP and C-terminal thioesterase domains (Fig. 1). Its ACP domains are naturally activated by the 4′-phosphopantetheinyl (P-pant) transferase PptT (14). The P-pant arm has the general function of carrying the substrate acyl chain via a thioester bond involving its terminal thiol group. In the present article we report the purification of a soluble activated form of the large Pks13 protein. For the first time, the loading mechanisms of both types of substrates on specific domains of the PKS were investigated. We describe a unique catalytic mechanism of the Pks13-FadD32 enzymatic couple and the development of an in vitro condensation assay that generates the formation of α-alkyl β-ketoacids, the precursors of mycolic acids.