CK5/6 in effusions: no difference between mesothelioma and pulmonary and nonpulmonary adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To test the performance of CK5/6 for the differentiation between mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and benign mesothelia/proliferations in effusion cytology. STUDY DESIGN: CKS/6 immunocytochemistry was applied to ethanol-fixed cytospin preparations from 74 benign and malignant effusions. RESULTS: Reactivity was seen in 7 of 8 mesotheliomas and in 9 of 11 benign mesothelial proliferations but also in 11 of l7 pulmonary adenocarcinomas and in 12 of 31 adenocarcinomas of nonpulmonary origin. Reactivity was also found in 3 of 5 non-small cell lung carcinomas and 1 of 1 squamous carcinoma. CONCLUSION: CK5/6 reactivity was found in a considerable proportion of metastatic adenocarcinomas of pulmonary and nonpulmonary origin. The high reactivity rate in pulmonary adenocarcinomas disagrees with the results obtained with histologic sections from solid tumor tissue, and CK5/6 seems to be of very limited value as an additional marker in effusion cytology.     

Benign multicystic mesothelial proliferation of the peritoneum: immunohistochemical and electron microscopical study of a case and review of the literature.

We report a case of benign multicystic mesothelial proliferation (the so-called multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma) arising multifocally in the abdomen of a 46-year-old white man. His anamnesis showed an 8-year history of intermittent pain in the right lower abdominal quadrant. Mucin stains, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy confirmed the mesothelial origin of the lesion. Review of the available literature allowed us to find another 85 reported cases of benign multicystic mesothelial proliferations of the peritoneum. Out of these cases, eighteen only occurred in men, the majority being reported in middle-aged women mostly with complaints of abdominal pain. Electron microscopy or immunohistochemistry are needed to make a differential diagnosis towards other multicystic lesions, such as peritoneal cystic lymphangioma. Although multicystic mesothelial proliferations of the peritoneum have often been regarded as benign neoplasms, the true nature--neoplastic or hyperplastic--of these lesions still remains greatly elusive. Therefore, we believe that the unbinding term benign multicystic mesothelial proliferation (first used with regard to the unique hitherto reported case arisen in the pleural cavity) should be considered at present more appropriate to indicate even these peritoneal lesions.     

Cell blocks in cytopathology: a review of preparative methods,utility in diagnosis and role in ancillary studies

The cell block (CB) is a routine procedure in cytopathology that has gained importance because of its pivotal role in diagnosis and ancillary studies. There is no precise review in the published literature that deals with the various methods of preparation of CB, its utility in diagnosis, immunocytochemistry (ICC) or molecular testing, and its drawbacks. An extensive literature search on CB in cytology using internet search engines was performed for this review employing the following keywords: cell block, cytoblock, cytology, cytopathology, methods, preparation, fixatives, diagnostic yield, ancillary and molecular studies. Ever since its introduction more than a century ago, the CB technique has undergone numerous modifications to improve the quality of the procedure; however, the overall principle remains the same in each method. CBs can be prepared from virtually all varieties of cytological samples. In today's era of personalized medicine, cytological specimens, including CBs, augment the utility of cytological samples in analysing the molecular alterations as effectively as surgical biopsies or resection specimens. With the availability of molecular targeted therapy for many cancers, a large number of recent studies have used cytological material or CBs for molecular characterization. The various techniques of CB preparation with different fixatives, their advantages and limitations, and issues of diagnostic yield are discussed in this review.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of malignant mesothelioma

The results of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in 19 cases of malignant mesothelioma are presented. Adequate material for a diagnosis of malignancy was obtained in 17 cases, and in 8 cases a specific diagnosis of mesothelioma could be made. In four other cases, the findings were either consistent with or suggestive of mesothelioma; in four, accurate distinction from other neoplasms was not possible, and in two cases, adenocarcinoma was suggested. The spectrum of cytologic findings ranged from neoplasms of purely epithelial appearance through more pleomorphic biphasic neoplasms to anaplastic tumors. A combination of epithelial-like cell clusters, pavement-like sheets of epithelial cells with well-defined cell borders and prominent cell separation, dispersed angular cells with dense cytoplasm and some spindle-cell forms was the most specific cytologic pattern for mesothelioma. In four neoplasms, ultrastructural examination of aspirated material provided the additional evidence for a definitive diagnosis. The identification of hyaluronic acid within intracytoplasmic vacuoles, either in smears or in cell blocks, confirmed the diagnosis in three tumors. Only in one case, with a strong clinical background suggesting mesothelioma, was the cytologic preparation sufficient for diagnosis without ancillary diagnostic methods. FNA is of particular value in the diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma in patients who do not present with a pleural effusion. Obtaining material for cell block preparations, cytochemistry or ultrastructural study is generally necessary for definitive tumor typing.     

DNA flow cytometry of pleural effusions. Comparison with pathology for the diagnosis of malignancy

A study was undertaken to determine the potential value of DNA flow cytometry (FCM) for the diagnosis of malignancy in pleural effusions and to compare its results with those of traditional cytomorphology. Forty-one pleural fluids from 37 patients were evaluated by DNA FCM and routine cytologic techniques. Of the 41 pleural fluids, 29 (70.7%) demonstrated an abnormal DNA content by FCM. Two of the 29 pleural fluids had been originally diagnosed as benign by cytology. Cytologic review of these two cases showed no abnormal cells; therefore, there were no false-negative cases based on cytology. In 12 (29.3%) of the 41 fluids, DNA FCM and cytologic evaluation both indicated benign processes. Our preliminary observations indicate that FCM is an accurate and reliable technique that may be of aid in the diagnosis of malignant effusions. The technique may prove to be of special value in the differential diagnosis of reactive mesothelial cells versus malignant mesothelioma as well as for following patients who receive chemotherapy for malignant pleural effusions. DNA FCM may also complement cytomorphologic diagnoses in other serous, exfoliative or aspiration material.     

Cytophotometric determination of DNA in mesotheliomas and reactive mesothelial cells

Cytophotometry was used to study the nuclear DNA content of cells in Feulgen-stained effusion specimens from 18 patients with mesothelioma and 14 patients with reactive mesothelial proliferations. The mean DNA content (MDNA) of mesothelioma cells was significantly higher than that of reactive mesothelial cells (P less than .001). Other parameters reflecting the DNA content also differed significantly between the two kinds of cells, including (1) the ratio of mean mesothelial DNA to mean lymphocyte DNA, (2) the percentage of mesothelial cells with DNA content exceeding three times the lymphocyte MDNA and (3) the coefficient of variation of the DNA content. Since these parameters were highly correlated, only one was accepted in a stepwise linear discriminant model for distinguishing reactive from mesotheliomatous effusions. The model correctly classified all of the reactive effusions studied and 89% of the mesotheliomatous effusions. These results indicate that DNA analysis, using the Feulgen stain and cytophotometry, yields criteria that may be useful in distinguishing benign reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in effusions when used in conjunction with other traditional parameters.     

Beyond the suspicious thyroid fine needle aspirate. A review

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is currently the best diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules. However, the cytologic category of indeterminate or suspicious lesion, which is found in 10-15% of cases, remains a challenge. Since neither clinical presentation nor intraoperative frozen section is often helpful in differentiating these lesions and since surgical procedures for benign and malignant lesions differ, there is a clear need to develop ancillary tests. In this review we identify 12 potential markers of thyroid malignancy that have been examined in thyroid cytologic samples. Although many of these markers hold promise as adjuncts to FNA cytology, multicenter studies have often shown limitations in the predictive value of these assays due to lack of specificity, sensitivity or both. The recent development, however, of tissue microarray techniques to validate promising new markers suggests that improvements in the approach to indeterminate thyroid FNA samples may soon be at hand. This review presents a summary of the issues facing the development of a clinically useful diagnostic test in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules.     

Primary pleuropulmonary synovial sarcoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration with cytogenetic confirmation: a case report

BACKGROUND: Pleuropulmonary synovial sarcomas (PPSSs) are rare neoplasins that have been well described in recent years, although there are only very infrequent reports within the cytology literature. Such lesions present a diagnostic challenge on fine needle aspiration (ENA) due to several factors, particularly when the aspirate material displays monophasic, small cell or poorly differentiated morphology. Immunoperoxidase studies on cell block material and confirmation with molecular cytogenetics are important tools to establish the diagnosis and determine appropriate therapy. We report a case of PPSS in a 27-year-old man diagnosed by computed tomography (CT)-guided FNA with confirmation by conventional and molecular cytogenetics. CASE: A 27-year-old man presented with several rapidly enlarging, pleura-based masses following a several-month history of recurrent hemopneumothorax. Previous surgical pathology on decorticated pleura was interpreted as a reactive mesothelial proliferation at another institution. Upon referral, CT-guided transthoracic FNA was performed. Smears revealed a highly cellular, dispersed "small round blue cell" neoplasm in a hemorrhagic background. The cytomorphology, in conjunction with a select immunoperoxidase panel, was diagnostic of PPSS. Conventional and molecular cytogenetics subsequently provided confirmation of the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: PPSSs are uncommon neoplasms seldom diagnosed by FNA, with only very rare reports in the cytology literature. Although their cytomorphology has been well described, monophasic tumors and other morphologic variants present a diagnostic challenge and may be difficult to discern from a variety of neoplastic and reactive/reparative processes. Emphasis should be placed upon securing material at the time of aspiration for immunoperoxidase studies (cell block or core biopsy). In equivocal cases, conventional and/or molecular cytogenetic studies may be needed.     

Cytology and immunocytochemistry of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma

A study of the value of cytologic examination in the diagnosis of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma showed that fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a definitive means of making the diagnosis of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. In experienced hands, FNA cytology approached a diagnostic accuracy of 100%. With exfoliative cytology, technically adequate sputum samples offered an 82% diagnostic yield; sputum cytology should thus be considered as an adjunct method in establishing the diagnosis. Several cytologic features that strongly suggest the diagnosis of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and help to differentiate it from adenocarcinomas of other body sites are outlined. It is also concluded that immunocytochemical stains have limited value in differentiating bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and other types of clear cell malignant neoplasms, including mesothelioma, unless a panel of antibodies is used, and are of no value in ascertaining whether the cells are benign or malignant.     

Cytology of mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis metastatic to the lung

The case of a 63-year-old man with malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis confirmed by electron microscopy is presented. The tumor recurred in the scrotal skin and subsequently metastasized to the inguinal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Four and a half years after the original diagnosis, pulmonary metastases were discovered by cytologic examination of bronchial washings and confirmed by transbronchial lung biopsy. The cytologic features of the metastatic malignant mesothelial cells are described and compared to those of mesothelioma cells in body cavity fluids. The role of cytology in the early detection of such tumors is discussed.     

Cytopathology of malignant mesothelioma. Reappraisal of the diagnostic value of collagen cores

The identification of malignant mesothelial cells in cytological smears prepared from serous effusions is still hampered by the lack of features specific for mesothelial differentiation. We examined the diagnostic value of collagen cores within clusters of tumour cells in cytological smears prepared from effusions from 43 patients with malignant mesothelioma and of 62 cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma. In Giemsa-stained smears collagen cores were detected in 51% of the cases of malignant mesothelioma and in none of the smears with metastatic adenocarcinoma. Using the Azan stain, collagen cores were detected in 64% of the malignant mesotheliomas and 4% of the adenocarcinomas. Immunoelectron microscopy demonstrated that the collagen cores are largely composed of collagen type III fibrils and some elastin embedded in a homogenous extracellular matrix. It can be concluded that the presence of collagen cores within clusters of tumour cells is highly suggestive of mesothelial differentiation and a common finding in malignant mesothelioma.     

Simian virus 40 and human tumors: It is time to study mechanisms

Several studies found simian virus 40 (SV40) in 47% to 83% of human mesotheliomas. Mesotheliomas are malignant tumors of the pleura and peritoneum, firmly associated with asbestos exposure. In this issue, Gazdar and colleagues ?Shivapurkar et al., 1999 found that SV40 is present only in the malignant cells and not in the surrounding stromal cells. Using the microdissection technique, they found SV40 in 54% of 93 mesotheliomas of the epithelial type. The surrounding reactive stromal cells, (20 lung cancers and 14 mesotheliomas of the sarcomatoid/fibrous type) did not contain SV40, confirming the specificity of their positive findings. Furthermore, SV40 was found in 14% of 14 non-malignant reactive mesothelial cell proliferations. In 12 cases of mesothelioma a noninvasive (or in situ) component was also identified. In all four cases in which SV40 sequences were present in the invasive component, sequences were also present in the accompanying noninvasive component. These data suggest that the virus resides in the mesothelial cells prior to tumor development. The data address the remaining concerns raised at an International Meeting organized by the NIH, FDA, and CDC in 1997 to definitively associate SV40 with human mesothelioma. It is time now to investigate the pathogenic mechanisms of this association, and if SV40-infected mesothelial cells are more susceptible to other carcinogens, such as asbestos. Furthermore, we must investigate the interaction between the host immune system and SV40-infected mesothelial cells, and study if the immunosuppressive activity of asbestos interferes with tumor rejection. These studies should lead to a better understanding of mesothelioma pathogenesis, and possibly to new therapeutic approaches aimed at interfering with the expression of the SV40 genome and/or at eliciting a strong immune response against SV40 infected mesothelial cells.     

Microdissection, mRNA amplification and microarray: a study of pleural mesothelial and malignant mesothelioma cells

The studies of molecular alterations in tumor cells with microarrays are often hampered by inherent tissue heterogeneity. The emergence of Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) allowed us to overcome this challenge since it gives selective access to cancer cells that are isolated from their native tissue environment. In this report, we microdissected mesothelial cells and malignant mesothelioma cells of ex vivo resected specimens using LCM. Amplified RNA from mesothelial and mesothelioma microdissected cells allowed us to measure global gene expression with 10 K-microarrays in four independent experiments. We screened 9850 annotated human genes, 1275 of which have satisfied our data analysis requirements. They included 302 overexpressed genes and 160 downregulated genes in mesothelioma microdissected cells as compared to mesothelial microdissected cells. Among them, the expression levels of eight genes, namely BF, FTL, IGFBP7, RARRES1, RARRES2, RBP1, SAT, and TXN according to HUGO nomenclature, were increased, whereas six: ALOX5AP, CLNS1A, EIF4A2, ELK3, REQ and SYPL, were found to be underexpressed in mesothelioma microdissected cells. The ferritin light polypeptide (FTL) gene overexpression was confirmed by real time quantitative PCR. Our approach allowed a comprehensive in situ examination of mesothelioma and provided an accurate way to find new marker genes that may be useful for diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.     

Mesothelioma Symposium 11.30–12.30 Tuesday 16 September 2003. Cytopathology of malignant mesothelioma

The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma on the cytology of serous effusions is a two‐phase process. First is to determine that the effusion is malignant based on morphological features such as a highly cellular fluid with many large three dimensional cell aggregates, and/or the recognition of minor malignant criteria including prominent cell engulfment, uniformly present very prominent nucleoli, or the finding of very large (giant) cells. In cell block sections, strong positive staining with EMA often with cell membrane accentuation provides compelling support for a cytological diagnosis of malignancy. Second is to recognize that the malignant cells have a mesothelial phenotype and do not represent metastatic malignancy (usually adenocarcinoma). Criteria in support of mesothelioma include the lack of a ‘two cell’ population, that is one native (mesothelial) and one foreign (metastatic), cells with abundant dense staining cytoplasm, the presence of ‘windows’ where mesothelioma cells lie in close apposition and intracytoplasmic glycogen presenting either as small peripheral vacuoles on MGG stained smears or large yellow refractile crescents on Papanicolaou stained smears. In addition, mesothliomas often possess connective tissue stromal cores occurring as either well‐formed collagen within papillary aggregates or lying free as pink (MGG) or light green (Pap) amorphous material in the background of the smear or in loose association with mesothelioma cells. Finally small orange staining squamous‐like cells can occasionally be identified and sometimes this may be a very prominent finding and has resulted in the false impression of a squamous cell carcinoma. Almost certainly these cells represent apoptotic tumour cells. The connective tissue mucin hyaluronic acid may be found as a net‐like pattern in the smear background or as large hard‐edged magenta‐stained vacuoles on MGG‐stained smears. Cell block sections provide architectural information and it is usually possible to separate mesothelioma aggregates with their cuboidal cells, central nuclei and abundant dense cytoplasm arranged in solid, papillary or hollow clusters from those of adenocarcinoma with less dense, often foamy cytoplasm, often composed of columnar cells with elongated nuclei. Aggregate form in adenocarcinoma can be variable but true acini are a rare finding. These cell block sections provide an ideal medium for histochemistry (PAS with and without diastase digestion) and immunocytochemistry. By using a panel of antibodies (Calretinin and CK 5/6, BerEp4, CEA, B72.3) it is almost always possible to distinguish mesothelioma from metastatic adenocarcinoma. Calretinin and CK 5/6 positive staining and absent staining with BerEp4, CEA and B72.3 is considered diagnostic of mesothelioma.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of soft tissue tumors

OBJECTIVE: To review of the value of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors (STT). STUDY DESIGN: A review of the literature was coupled with the authors' experience with indications, diagnostic specificity and pitfalls; clinical information; and the final cytology report. RESULTS: Over the last few years, FNA has come to be considered a valuable tool in the management of STT in that it affords a specificity of > 90%. FNA is of particular value in any subcutaneous lesion > 5 cm, in all pediatric tumors and whenever direct incision biopsy is particularly contraindicated. Material from aspirates can be used to obtain cytologic smears for conventional staining, special pigment identification, histochemical techniques, cell blocks for paraffin embedding and ancillary techniques (immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, and densitometric and cytogenetic analyses). The cytologic diagnosis, like its histologic counterpart, should be based on a correct evaluation of clinical data (age, localization, size, effect on bone, nerve and vessel involvement), radiologic information, cytologic findings (architectural pattern, cell and stroma characteristics) and results of special staining techniques. The final cytology report should place the tumor in one of three basic categories: benign, malignant, and inconclusive or undetermined. Wherever possible, a histopathologic diagnosis should also be provided, either based on purely cytologic criteria or aided by ancillary techniques. CONCLUSION: FNA does not present major complications and permits a swift, preliminary diagnosis in a large number of cases. The method is most effective when the aspiration is performed by an experienced pathologist.     

Reactivity of six antibodies in effusions of mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and mesotheliosis: stepwise logistic regression analysis

Anti‐CEA, anti‐vimentin, CAM5.2, BerEp4, Leu‐M1 and anti‐EMA were applied to effusions from 36 mesotheliomas, 53 adenocarcinomas and 24 reactive mesothelial proliferations. Stepwise logistic regression analysis selected three criteria of major importance for distinguishing between adenocarcinoma and mesothelioma: BerEp4, CEA and EMA accentuated at the cell membrane (mEMA), these three being of similar diagnostic value. The pattern BerEp4^?, CEA^? and mEMA⁺ was fully predictive for mesothelioma (sensitivity 47%), whereas the opposite pattern was fully predictive for adenocarcinoma (sensitivity 80%). Only EMA seemed to distinguish between mesotheliosis and mesothelioma. Comparison of reactivity in cytological and histological material from the same mesotheliomas showed similar staining frequencies for CEA and CAM5.2, with some random variation for Leu‐M1 and EMA, whereas vimentin and BerEp4 reactivity was more frequent in cytological specimens.     

Ultrastructure of pleural mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma in malignant effusions as compared with reactive mesothelial cells.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ultrastructural features of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma cells in cytologic specimens from pleural effusions. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively studied 35 pleural effusions: 12 diffuse malignant pleural mesotheliomas (8 epithelial type, 4 biphasic type), 12 pulmonary adenocarcinomas and 11 cases of reactive mesothelial cells. RESULTS: In the cytoplasm, reactive and malignant mesothelial cells had more-abundant intermediate filaments (P < .05, P < .01) and fewer free ribosomes (P < .001, P < .001) than adenocarcinoma cells. Reactive mesothelial cells had fewer mitochondria than mesothelioma cells (P < .05). Mesothelioma cells had longer, thinner microvilli on the cell surfaces (P < .001); length/diameter ratios of microvilli were 19.1 +/- 7.0 (mesothelioma) vs. 9.1 +/- 2.2 (adenocarcinoma) and 9.2 +/- 2.4 (mesothelial cells). Giant intercellular junctions (desmosomes or desmosomelike structures > 1 micron in length) were found in eight cases of mesothelioma. Core filaments or rootlets in microvilli were present in two cases of adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Because cytologic specimens from pleural effusions were easy to obtain, we think ultrastructural cytology is useful in distinguishing mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma and benign effusions.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma: a case report

BACKGROUND: Well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma (WDPM) is an uncommon subtype of mesothelioma that typically occurs in the peritoneum of women without a history of asbestos exposure and usually follows an indolent clinical course. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of this type of tumor has rarely been reported. CASE: A 64-year-old woman with 11-year history of colon cancer and an adrenal nodule was found, on abdominal computed tomography, to have a mass in the right lobe of the liver. Aspirates of the mass were composed of abundant, tight, papillary groups, monolayered, pavementlike sheets; and scattered single cells with minimal atypia. The cell block showed a predominantly papillary growth pattern and a single layer of bland, cuboidal to flattened covering cells with stout, fibrovascular cores containing clusters of foamy histiocytes. Tumor cells in the focal tubulopapillary and solid areas were mingled with inflammatory cells and showed slightly more atypia than did the cells covering the papillae. The differential diagnoses were intrahepatic papillary neoplasm, including well-differentiated mesothelioma and metastatic low grade papillary serous carcinoma. At surgery the tumor was found to be a pedunculated peritoneal mass that arose from the posterior surface of the right lobe of the liver. The mesothelial origin of the tumor was confirmed by both immunoperoxidase study and electron microscopic examination, which demonstrated long, slender, branching microvilli. CONCLUSION: Familiarity with the cytomorphologic features and clinical presentation of WDPM, knowledge of the exact anatomic location and consideration of the appropriate differential diagnosis combined with ancillary studies are the keys to an accurate diagnosis.     

The diagnostic and molecular characteristics of malignant mesothelioma and ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma

B. Davidson The diagnostic and molecular characteristics of malignant mesothelioma and ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma Malignant mesothelioma and ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma are two of the most common tumours affecting the serosal cavities. Unlike other malignant tumours diagnosed at this anatomical site, such as lung and breast carcinoma, malignant mesothelioma and serous carcinoma share a common histogenesis, may be difficult to differentiate morphologically, and co‐express many of the diagnostic markers used by cytopathologists in effusion diagnosis. Selected markers have nevertheless shown sufficient sensitivity and specificity to differentiate serous carcinoma from malignant mesothelioma effectively. Recently, our group applied high throughput technology to the identification of new markers that may aid in differentiating these two cancer types and validated several of these markers in follow‐up studies. This review will present current data regarding the diagnostic and biological aspects of malignant mesothelioma and ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma.