Neuropeptide Y induced modulation of dopamine synthesis in the striatum

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the activation of NPY receptors alters catecholamines (CA) synthesis in the central nervous system and, if so, to identify the NPY receptor subtype(s) mediating this effect. Tyrosine hydroxylation, the rate-limiting step in CA synthesis, was assessed by measuring the accumulation of 3,4-dihydroxyphenyalanine (DOPA) by high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to electrochemical detection (HPLC-EC) in rat striatal dices following incubation of the tissue with the aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor m-hydroxybenzyl hydrazine (NSD 1015). Treatment with NSD 1015 resulted in an increase in DOPA accumulation that was increased even further following depolarization with a high potassium (KCl) buffer. PYY13-36 and NPY13-36 both produced a significant enhancement of the KCl-induced increase in DOPA accumulation. The effect of PYY13-36 was completely attenuated by the selective Y2 antagonist BIIE0246 suggesting that activation of Y2 receptors enhanced the synthesis of dopamine. In contrast to the effects of NPY13-36 and PYY13-36; NPY, PYY and PYY3-36 all produced a significant attenuation of the KCl-induced increase in DOPA accumulation. The Y1 antagonist BIBO3304 and the Y5-antagonist CGP71683A, both prevented the inhibitory effect of NPY converting it to a stimulatory effect. The enhancement of the NPY induced increase in DOPA accumulation observed by BIBO3304 was attenuated when examined in the presence of the Y2 antagonist BIIE0246. These results suggest that activation of NPY receptors can modulate the synthesis of CA in the rat striatum. The Y1 and Y5 receptor appear to be involved in attenuation, while Y2 receptors are involved in the stimulation of synthesis.     

Potent and selective tools to investigate neuropeptide Y receptors in the central and peripheral nervous systems: BIB03304 (Y1) and CGP71683A (Y5)

We have evaluated 3 newly developed neuropeptide Y receptor antagonists in various in vitro binding and bioassays: BIBO3304 (Y1), T4[NPY33-36]4 (Y2), and CGP71683A (Y5). In rat brain homogenates, BIBO3304 competes for the same population of [125I][Leu31,Pro34] peptide YY (PYY) binding sites (75%) as BIBP3226, but with a 10 fold greater affinity (IC50 of 0.2 +/- 0.04 nM for BIBO3304 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.07 nM for BIBP3226),while CGP71683A has high affinity for 25% of specific [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY binding sites. Both BIBO3304 and CGP71683A (at 1.0 microM) were unable to compete for a significant proportion of specific [125I]PYY3-36/Y2 sites. The purported Y2 antagonist T4[NPY33-36]4 competed against [125I]PYY3-36 binding sites with an affinity of 750 nM. These results were confirmed in HEK 293 cells transfected with either the rat Y1, Y2, Y4, or Y5 receptor cDNA. BIBO3304, but not CGP71683A, competed with high affinity for [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY binding sites in HEK 293 cells transfected with the rat Y1 receptor cDNA, whereas the reverse profile was observed upon transfection with the rat Y5 receptor cDNA. Additionally, both molecules were inactive at Y2 and Y4 receptor subtypes expressed in HEK 293 cells. Receptor autoradiographic studies revealed the presence of [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY/BIBO3304-insensitive sites in the rat brain as reported previously for BIBP3226. Finally, the selective antagonistic properties of BIBO3304 were demonstrated in a Y1 bioassay (rabbit saphenous vein; pA2 value of 9.04) while being inactive in Y2 (rat vas deferens) and Y4 (rat colon) bioassays. These results confirm the high affinity and selectivity of BIBO3304 and CGP71683A for the Y1 and Y5 receptor subtypes, respectively, while the purported Y2 antagonist, T4[NPY33-36]4 possesses rather low affinity for this receptor.     

Interaction of NPY compounds with the rat glucocorticoid-induced receptor (GIR) reveals similarity to the NPY-Y2 receptor

The rat glucocorticoid-induced receptor (rGIR) is an orphan G protein-coupled receptor awaiting pharmacological characterization. Among known receptors, rGIR exhibits highest sequence similarity to the neuropeptide Y (NPY)-Y(2) receptor (38-40%). The pharmacological profile of rGIR was investigated using (125)I-PYY(3-36), a Y(2)-preferring radioligand and several NPY analogs. rGIR displayed a similar displacement profile as reported for the Y(2) receptor, in that the Y(2)-selective C terminus fragments of NPY and PYY (NPY(3-36) and PYY(3-36)) showed high affinity binding and activation of rGIR (low nanomolar range). The rank order potency for displacement was NPY(3-36)>PYY(3-36)=NPY>NPY(13-36)>Ac, Leu NPY(24-36)>[D-Trp(32)]-NPY>Leu(31), Pro(34)-NPY=hPP. NPY and Y(2)-selective agonists NPY(3-36) and PYY(3-36) led to significant activation of (35)S-GTPgammaS binding to rGIR transfected cells. BIIE0246, a specific Y(2) antagonist, displaced (125)I-PYY(3-36) binding to rGIR with high affinity (95nM). Activation of (35)S-GTPgammaS binding by Y(2)-selective agonist in rGIR transfected cells was also completely abolished by BIIE0246. Our data report, for the first time, an interaction of NPY ligands with rGIR expressed in vitro, and indicate similarities between GIR and the NPY-Y(2) receptor.     

Existence of both neuropeptide Y, Y1 and Y2 receptors in pig spleen: evidence using subtype-selective antagonists in vivo

The effects of the first selective, non-peptide, NPY Y2 receptor antagonist (S)-N2-[[1-[2-[4-[(R,S)-5,11-dihydro-6(6h)-oxodibenz[b,e]azepin-11-yl]-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethyl]cyclopentyl]acetyl]-N-[2-[1,2-dihydro-3,5 (4H)-dioxo-1,2-diphenyl-3H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl]ethyl]-argininamid (BIIE0246) were studied on splenic vascular responses evoked in the pig in vivo. BIIE0246 abolished the splenic vasoconstrictor response to the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl[Leu25Leu31]NPY(24-36), but did not affect the response to the NPY Y1 receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34]NPY, which in turn was abolished by the selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist (2R)-5-([amino(imino)methyl]amino)-2-[(2,2-diphenylacetyl)amino]-N-[(IR)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-pentanamide (H 409/22). Furthermore, the PYY-evoked splenic vasoconstrictor response was partially antagonized by BIIE0246 and subsequently almost abolished by the addition of H 409/22. It is concluded that BIIE0246 exerts selective (vs the NPY Y1 receptor) NPY Y2 receptor antagonism, and thus represents an interesting tool for classification of NPY receptors, in vivo. In addition, evidence for NPY Y2 receptor mediated vasoconstriction was presented. Furthermore, both NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors are involved in the splenic vasoconstrictor response to PYY.     

NPY signaling through Y1 receptors modulates thalamic oscillations

Neuropeptide Y is the ligand of a family of G-protein coupled receptors (Y(1) to Y(6)). In the thalamus, exogenous and endogenously released NPY can shorten the duration of thalamic oscillations in brain slices from P13 to P15 rats, an in vitro model of absence seizures. Here, we examine which Y receptors are involved in this modulation. Application of the Y(1) receptor agonist Leu(31)Pro(34)NPY caused a reversible reduction in the duration of thalamic oscillations (-26.6+/-7.8%), while the Y(2) receptor agonist peptideYY((3-36)) and the Y(5) receptor agonist BWX-46 did not exert a significant effect. No Y receptor agonist affected oscillation period. Application of antagonists of Y(1), Y(2) and Y(5) receptors (BIBP3226, BIIE0246 and L152,806, respectively) produced results consistent with those obtained from agonists. BIBP3226 caused a reversible disinhibition, an effect that increases oscillation duration (18.2+/-9.7%) while BIIE0246 and L152,806 had no significant effect. Expression of NPY is limited to neurons in the reticular thalamic nucleus (nRt), but Y(1) receptors are expressed in both nRt and adjacent thalamic relay nuclei. Thus, intra-nRt or nRt to relay nucleus NPY release could cause Y(1) receptor mediated inhibition of thalamic oscillations.     

PYY preference is a common characteristic of neuropeptide Y receptors expressed in human, rat, and mouse gastrointestinal epithelia

This investigation describes the relative potencies of four peptide agonists, namely, peptide YY (PYY), [Leu3l,Pro34]PYY (Pro34pYY), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (Pro34NPY), as antisecretory agents in human, rat, and mouse gastrointestinal preparations. The inhibition of agonist responses by the Y1-receptor antagonist BIBP 3226 was also tested in each preparation. An unexpectedly pronounced preference for PYY and Pro34PYY was observed in functional studies of two human epithelial lines stably transfected with the rat Y1 receptor (Y1-7 and C1Y1-6). NPY and Pro34NPY were at least an order of magnitude less effective than PYY in these functional studies but were only marginally less potent in displacement binding studies using membrane preparations of the same clonal lines. The orders of agonist potency obtained in Y1-7 and C1Y1-6 epithelia were compared with those obtained from a single human colonic adenocarcinoma cell line (Colony-6, which constitutively expresses Y1 receptors) and also from mucosal preparations of rat and mouse descending colon. Similar peptide orders of potency were obtained in rat and mouse colonic mucosae and Colony-6 epithelia, all of which exhibited PYY preference (although less pronounced than with Y1-7 and C1Y1-6 epithelia) and significant sensitivity to the Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP 3226. We have compared the pharmacology of these five mammalian epithelial preparations and provide cautionary evidence against the reliance upon agonist concentration-response relationships alone, in the characterization of NPY receptor types.     

Anxiolytic-like effect of the selective neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor antagonist BIIE0246 in the elevated plus-maze

The involvement of Neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the pathophysiology of mood disorders has been suggested by clinical and preclinical evidence. NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors have been proposed to mediate the NPY modulation of stress responses and anxiety related behaviors. To further investigate the role of Y2 receptors in anxiety we studied the effect of BIIE0246, a selective Y2 receptor antagonist, in the elevated plus-maze test. Rats treated with 1.0 nmol BIIE0246 showed an increase in the time spent on the open arm of the maze. In addition, to study the effects of the Y2 antagonism on NPY protein level, NPY-like immunoreactivity was measured in different brain regions following treatment with BIIE0246, but no statistically significant effects were observed. These results suggest that BIIE0246 has an anxiolytic-like profile in the elevated plus-maze.     

Selective role of neuropeptide Y receptor subtype Y2 in the control of gonadotropin secretion in the rat

Different signals with key roles in energy homeostasis regulate the reproductive axis. These include neuropeptide Y and polypeptide YY(3-36), whose type Y(2) receptor is the most abundant of this family in the brain. We evaluated herein the putative roles of Y(2) receptors in the control of gonadotropin secretion by means of central administration of PYY(13-36) (agonist of Y(2) receptors) and BIIE 0246 (antagonist of Y(2) receptors) to intact and orchidectomized male rats. In addition, the ability of PYY(13-36) to elicit GnRH and gonadotropin secretion in vitro and the impact of fasting on LH responses to PYY(13-36) in vivo were also monitored. Central administration of PYY(13-36) significantly decreased the circulating levels of both gonadotropins, an effect that was observed in prepubertal and adult rats. Yet a dual action of Y(2) receptors in the control of male gonadotropic axis was evidenced as their activation induced 1) stimulation of gonadotropin responses to GnRH at the pituitary but 2) inhibition of GnRH secretion at the hypothalamus. Antagonization of Y(2) receptors failed to modify basal LH secretion in intact males either after being fed ad libitum or after being fasted. In contrast, their central blockade in orchidectomized rats evoked a significant increase in circulating LH and FSH level, suggesting the constitutive activation of Y(2) receptor in such stimulated conditions. In summary, our data evidence a complex mode of action of Y(2) receptors in the control of gonadotropic axis, with stimulatory and inhibitory actions at different levels of the system that are sensitive to the gonadal status.     

Studies of the human, rat, and guinea pig Y4 receptors using neuropeptide Y analogues and two distinct radioligands

The neuropeptide Y-family receptor Y4 differs extensively between human and rat in sequence, receptor binding, and anatomical distribution. We have investigated the differences in binding profile between the cloned human, rat, and guinea pig Y4 receptors using NPY analogues with single amino acid replacements or deletion of the central portion. The most striking result was the increase in affinity for the rat receptor, but not for human or guinea pig, when amino acid 34 was replaced with proline; [Ahx(8-20),Pro(34)]NPY bound to the rat Y4 receptor with 20-fold higher affinity than [Ahx(8-20)]NPY. Also, the rat Y4 tolerates alanine in position 34 since p[Ala(34)]NPY bound with similar affinity as pNPY while the affinity for hY4 and gpY4 decreased about 50-fold. Alanine substitutions in position 33, 35, and 36 as well as the large loop-deletion, [Ahx(5-24)]NPY, reduced the binding affinity to all three receptors more than 100-fold. NPY and PYY competed with (125)I-hPP at Y4 receptors expressed in CHO cells according to a two-site model. This was investigated for gpY4 by saturation with either radiolabeled hPP or pPYY. The number of high-affinity binding-sites for (125)I-pPYY was about 60% of the receptors recognized by (125)I-hPP. Porcine [Ala(34)]NPY and [Ahx(8-20)]NPY bound to rY4 (but not to hY4 or gpY4) according to a two-site model. These results suggest that different full agonists can distinguish between different active conformations of the gpY4 receptor and that Y4 may display functional differences in vivo between human, guinea pig, and rat.     

Role of Y(2) receptors in the regulation of gastric tone in rats

We set out to determine the effect of peptide YY(3-36) (PYY(3-36)) on the gastric muscle tone in conscious rats by measuring intragastric pressure (IGP) during intragastric nutrient drink infusion. After an overnight fast, a chronically implanted gastric fistula was connected to a custom-made nutrient drink infusion system and a catheter to measure IGP. IGP was measured before and during the infusion of a nutrient drink (Nutridrink; 0.5 ml/min) until 10 ml was infused. Rats were treated with PYY(3-36) (0, 33, and 100 pmol·kg(-1)·min(-1)) in combination with a subcutaneous injection of the Y(2) receptor antagonists JNJ31020028 (10 mg/kg) or BIIE0246 (2 mg/kg). Experiments were also performed after subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and after pretreatment with 3 ml of nutrient drink (to mimic a fed state). IGP was compared as the average IGP during nutrient infusion, represented as means ± SE and compared using ANOVA. PYY(3-36) dose dependently increased the IGP during nutrient infusion (4.7 ± 0.3, 5.7 ± 0.5 and 7.3 ± 0.7 mmHg; P < 0.01) while JNJ31020028 and BIIE0246 could block this increase [4.4 ± 0.5 (P < 0.001) and 4.8 ± 0.4 (P < 0.05) mmHg, respectively]. Also in vagotomized rats, PYY(3-36) was able to significantly increase the IGP during, an effect attenuated by JNJ31020028. BIIE0246 and JNJ31020028 were not able to decrease the IGP when no PYY(3-36) was administered. PYY(3-36) increased gastric tone through an Y(2) receptor-mediated mechanism that does not involve the vagus nerve. Y(2) receptor antagonists were not able to decrease gastric tone without exogenous administration of PYY(3-36), indicating that Y(2) receptors do not play a crucial role in the determination of gastric tone in physiological conditions.     

Characterization of NPY receptor subtypes Y2 and Y7 in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

We report the cloning and pharmacological characterization of two neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor subtypes, Y2 and Y7, in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). These subtypes are approximately 50% identical to each other and belong to the Y2 subfamily of NPY receptors. The binding properties of the receptors were investigated after expression in human HEK-293 EBNA cells. Both receptors bound the three zebrafish peptides NPY, PYYa, and PYYb, as well as porcine NPY and PYY, with affinities in the nanomolar range that are similar to mammalian Y2. The affinity of the truncated porcine NPY fragments, NPY 13-36 and NPY 18-36 was markedly lower compared to mammalian and chicken Y2. This suggests that mammalian and chicken Y2 are unique among NPY receptors in their ability to bind truncated peptide fragments. The antagonist BIIE0246, developed for mammalian Y2, did not bind either of the two rainbow trout receptors. Our results support the proposed expansion of this gene family by duplications before the gnathostome radiation. They also reveal appreciable differences in the repertoire and characteristics of NPY receptors between fish and tetrapods stressing the importance of lineage-specific gene loss as well as sequence divergence after duplication.     

Physiological role of neuropeptide Y in the regulation of the ascending phase of the peristaltic reflex

The physiological role of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and of specific NPY receptors in regulating the intestinal peristaltic reflex was examined in three-compartment flat-sheet preparations of rat colon. Graded muscle stretch or mucosal stimulation applied to the central compartment inhibited NPY release in the orad compartment where ascending contraction was measured. NPY and the Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31, Pro34]NPY inhibited, whereas the selective Y1-receptor antagonist BIBP 3226 augmented ascending contraction and substance P (SP) release in the orad compartment induced by muscle stretch or mucosal stimulation. Neither agonist nor antagonist had any effect on descending relaxation or VIP release in the caudad compartment. The Y2-receptor agonist NPY13-36 and antagonist BIIE 0246 had no effect on peptide release or mechanical response. The results indicate that suppression of a tonic inhibitory influence of NPY neurons on excitatory neurotransmitter release contributes substantially to the orad contractile phase of the peristaltic reflex. The effect of NPY on neurotransmitter release is mediated by Y1 receptors.     

Orexigenic effect of the melanocortin MC4 receptor antagonist HS014 is inhibited only partially by neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor selective antagonists

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and melanocortin (MC) peptides have opposite effects on food intake: NPY-like peptides and MC receptor antagonists stimulate feeding and increase body weight, whereas melanocortins and NPY antagonists inhibit food intake. In this study we tested whether the orexigenic effect of the selective MC4 receptor antagonist HS014 (1 nmol) could be inhibited by three different NPY antagonists, (R)-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxy-phenyl)methyl]D-argininam ide (BIBP3226), (R)-N-[[4-(aminocarbonylaminomethyl)-phenyl]methyl]-N2(diphenyl acetyl)-argininamidetrifluoroacetate (BIBO3304), and decapeptide [D-Tyr(27,36)D-Thr32]NPY(27-36), after icv administration in freely feeding male rats. All three NPY receptor antagonists inhibited the orexigenic effects of HS014 partially and with markedly different potency. [D-Tyr(27,36)D-Thr32]NPY(27-36) was active only in subconvulsive dose. The NPY Y1 selective antagonist BIBP3226 was more effective in inhibiting the effect of HS014 than BIBO3304 despite in vitro data indicating that BIBP3226 is about 10 times less potent than BIBO3304 at NPY Y1 receptor. An enantiomer of BIBO3304, BIBO3457, failed to inhibit HS014-induced feeding, indicating that the effects of BIBO3304 were stereoselective. These results suggest that stimulation of food intake caused by weakening of melanocortinergic tone at the MC4 receptor is partially but not exclusively related to NPY Y1 receptor activation.     

Chicken neuropeptide Y receptor Y2: structural and pharmacological differences to mammalian Y2(1)

Here we report the molecular cloning of the chicken (Gallus gallus) neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor Y2, the first non-mammalian Y2 receptor. It displays 75-80% identity to mammalian Y2 and has a surprisingly divergent cytoplasmic tail. Expression of the receptor protein in a cell line showed that the receptor did not bind the mammalian Y2 selective antagonist BIIE0246. Furthermore, porcine [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY, which binds poorly to mammalian Y2, exhibited an unexpectedly high affinity for chicken Y2. In situ hybridisation revealed expression in the hippocampus. Thus, the chicken Y2 receptor exhibits substantial differences with regard to sequence and pharmacological profile in comparison to mammalian Y2 receptors, while the expression pattern in the central nervous system resembles that observed in mammals.     

Neuropeptide Y inhibits estrous behavior and stimulates feeding via separate receptors in Syrian hamsters

Central injections of neuropeptide Y (NPY) increase food intake in Syrian hamsters; however, the effect of NPY on sexual behavior in hamsters is not known nor are the receptor subtypes involved in feeding and sexual behaviors. We demonstrate that NPY inhibits lordosis duration in a dose-related fashion after lateral ventricular injection in ovariectomized, steroid-primed Syrian hamsters. Under the same conditions, we compared the effect of two receptor-differentiating agonists derived from peptide YY (PYY), PYY-(3-36) and [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY, on lordosis duration and food intake. PYY-(3-36) produced a 91% reduction in lordosis duration at 0.24 nmol. [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY was less potent, producing a reduction in lordosis duration (66%) only at 2.4 nmol. These results suggest NPY effects on estrous behavior are principally mediated by Y2 receptors. PYY-(3-36) and [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY stimulated comparable dose-related increases in total food intake (2 h), suggesting Y5 receptors are involved in feeding. The significance of different NPY receptor subtypes controlling estrous and feeding behavior is highlighted by results on expression of Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-IR) elicited by either PYY-(3-36) or [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY at a dose of each that differentiated between the two behaviors. Some differences were seen in the distribution of Fos-IR produced by the two peptides. Overall, however, the patterns of expression were similar. Our behavioral and anatomic results suggest that NPY-containing pathways controlling estrous and feeding behavior innervate similar nuclei, with the divergence in pathways controlling the separate behaviors characterized by linkage to different NPY receptor subtypes.     

Neuropeptide Y 16-36 inhibits mucociliary activity but does not affect blood flow in the rabbit maxillary sinus in vivo.

Recent investigations have shown neuropeptide Y (NPY) to be present in the rabbit maxillary sinus, and NPY is known to be released upon sympathetic nerve stimulation. To study, in vivo, the effect on mucociliary activity and blood flow, NPY 1-36 and some of its analogues were injected intra-arterially. The effects of the Y1/Y2 agonist NPY 1-36 was compared with the ones of the Y2 agonist NPY 16-36, the Y1-agonist [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and the Y1/Y2 agonist peptide YY. Mucociliary response was recorded photoelectrically and expressed as a percentage of the basal mucociliary activity immediately prior to challenge. The effect on blood flow was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry and expressed as a percentage of the mean blood flow during the 60 s preceding challenge. NPY 1-36 and NPY 16-36 both reduced mucociliary activity dose-dependently at equimolar dosages (0.024-1.2 nmol/kg). The greatest effect was seen after the highest dosage tested. NPY 1-36 reduced mucociliary activity by 14.6 +/- 1.8%, and NPY 16-36 by 13.2 +/- 1.4%. At the highest dosage tested the Y1 receptor agonist [Leu31,Pro34]NPY did not significantly reduce mucociliary activity, whereas PYY reduced mucociliary activity by 15.0 +/- 1.8%. Injections of NPY 16-36 had no effect on blood flow whereas NPY 1-36, [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and PYY all reduced blood flow dose-dependently. Maximal decrease was seen at the highest dosage tested and was 47.1 +/- 5.4%, 70.4 +/- 7.4% and 58.2 +/- 8.4%, respectively. These findings suggest the mucociliary effects to be mediated via Y2 receptors whereas blood flow is regulated via Y1 receptors.     

Functional CCK-A and Y2 receptors in guinea pig esophagus

Effects of cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8), peptide YY (PPY), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and their analogs on muscle contractions of esophageal strips were investigated. CCK-8 induced a tetrodotoxin and atropine-sensitive contraction. The relative potencies for CCK related peptides to induce contractions were CCK-8 > desulfated CCK-8 > gastrin-17-I. The CCK-A receptor antagonist L-364,718 was 300-fold more potent than the CCK-B receptor antagonist L-365,260 at inhibiting CCK-8-induced contraction. These indicate that neural CCK-A receptors mediate this contraction. PYY or NPY did not cause muscle contraction or inhibit muscle contraction induced by carbachol, endothelin-1 or KCl. However, both PYY and NPY concentration-dependently inhibited contraction induced by CCK-8. This inhibition was not affected by nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors L-NMMA or L-NAME. The relative potencies of PYY related peptides to inhibit CCK-8 induced contraction were PYY > NPY > NPY13-36 > [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY > pancreatic polypeptide (PP). We conclude that CCK interacts with neural CCK-A receptors to cause esophageal muscle contraction. PYY and NPY interact with Y2 receptors to inhibit this CCK-induced muscle contraction by an effect not related to NO.     

Feeding after fourth ventricular administration of neuropeptide Y receptor agonists in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) stimulate food intake after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle, suggesting that NPY receptors in the hindbrain are targets for the stimulatory effect of these peptides on food intake. However, the NPY/PYY receptor subtype mediating the feeding response in the hindbrain is not known. To approach to this question we compared dose-effect of several NPY receptor agonists to stimulate food intake in freely-feeding rats 60- and 120-min after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle. At the 120-min time point, PYY was 2- to 10-times as potent as NPY over the dose-response range and stimulated twice the total intake at the maximally effective dose (2-fold greater efficacy). NPY was 2-times as potent as the Y1, Y5 receptor agonist, [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY but acted with comparable efficacy. The Y5-, Y2-differentiating receptor agonist, NPY 2-36, was comparable in potency to PYY at low doses but equal in efficacy NPY and [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY. The Y2 receptor agonist, NPY 13-36, produced only a marginal effect on total food intake. The profile of agonist potency after fourth cerebral ventricle administration is similar to the profile obtained when these or related agonists are injected in the region of the hypothalamus. Agonists at both Y1 and Y5 receptors stimulated food intake with a rank order of potency that does not conclusively favor the exclusive involvement of a single known NPY receptor subtype. Thus it is possible that the ingestive effects of NPY and PYY are mediated by multiple or novel receptor subtypes in the hindbrain. And the relatively greater potency and efficacy of PYY raises the possibility that a novel PYY-preferring receptor in the hindbrain is involved in the stimulation of food intake.     

Differential regulation of neuropeptide Y receptors in the brains of NPY knock-out mice

To study the effect of NPY deletion on the regulation of its receptors in the NPY knockout (NPY KO) mice, the expression and binding of NPY receptors were investigated by in situ hybridization and receptor autoradiography using (125)I-[Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY and (125)I-PYY(3-36) as radioligands. A 6-fold increase in Y2 receptor mRNA was observed in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in NPY KO mice, but a significant change could not be detected for Y1, Y4, Y5 and y6 receptors. Receptor binding reveals a 60-400% increase of Y2 receptor binding in multiple brain areas. A similar increase in Y1 receptor binding was seen only in the hypothalamus. These results demonstrate the NPY receptor expression is altered in mice deficient for its natural ligand.     

Functional reconstitution of human neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(2) and Y(4) receptors in Sf9 insect cells

The four functionally expressed human neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes (hY(1)R, hY(2)R, hY(4)R, hY(5)R) belong to class A of the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and interact with pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i/o)-proteins. The number of small molecules described as ligands for hY(1)R and hY(5)R exceeds by far those for hY(2)R. Potent non-peptidergic ligands for the hY(4)R are not available so far. Here, we report on the functional reconstitution of the hY(2)R and the hY(4)R in Sf9 insect cells using the baculovirus system. Sf9 cells were genetically engineered by infection with up to four different baculoviruses, combining the receptors with G-proteins of the G(i/o) family and regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins to improve signal-to-noise ratio. In steady-state GTPase assays, using pNPY (Y(2)) and hPP (Y(4)), the GPCRs coupled to various G(i)/G(o)-proteins and both, RGS4 and GAIP, enhanced the signals. Co-expression systems hY(2)R + G?(i2) and hY(4)R + G?(i2)/G?(o) + RGS4, combined with G?(1)?(2), yielded best signal-to-noise ratios. hY(2)R function was validated using both agonistic peptides (NPY, PYY, NPY(13?36)) and selective non-peptidergic antagonists (BIIE0246 and derivatives), whereas the hY(4)R model was characterized with peptidergic agonists (PP, NPY, GW1229, and BW1911U90). Tunicamycin inhibited receptor N-glycosylation diminished NPY signals at hY(2)R and abolished hY(4)R function. Investigations with monovalent salts showed sensitivity of hY(4)R toward Na(+), revealing moderate constitutive activity. After validation, an acylguanidine (UR-PI284) was identified as a weak non-peptide Y(4)R antagonist. In summary, the established steady-state GTPase assays provide sensitive test systems for the characterization of Y(2) and Y(4) receptor ligands.