Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: State of the ART 2011

For the last 20 years, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been mostly performed on cleavage stage embryos after the biopsy of 1–2 cells and PCR and FISH have been used for the diagnosis. The main indications have been single gene disorders and inherited chromosome abnormalities. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy is a technique that has used PGD technology to examine chromosomes in embryos from couples undergoing IVF with the aim of helping select the chromosomally ‘best’ embryo for transfer. It has been applied to patients of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, repeated miscarriages and severe male factor infertility. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that PGS performed on cleavage stage embryos for a variety of indications does not improve delivery rates. At the cleavage stage, the cells biopsied from the embryo are often not representative of the rest of the embryo due to chromosomal mosaicism. There has therefore been a move towards blastocyst and polar body biopsy, depending on the indication and regulations in specific countries (in some countries, biopsy of embryos is not allowed). Blastocyst biopsy has an added advantage as vitrification of blastocysts, even post biopsy, has been shown to be a very successful method of cryopreserving embryos. However, mosaicism is also observed in blastocysts. There have been dramatic changes in the method of diagnosing small numbers of cells for PGD. Both array-comparative genomic hybridisation and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays have been introduced clinically for PGD and PGS. For PGD, the use of SNP arrays brings with it ethical concerns as a large amount of genetic information will be available from each embryo. For PGS, RCTs need to be conducted using both array-CGH and SNP arrays to determine if either will result in an increase in delivery rates.     

Gestational surrogacy and the role of routine embryo screening: Current challenges and future directions for preimplantation genetic testing

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is a component of IVF entailing selection of an embryo for transfer on the basis of chromosomal normalcy. If PGS were integrated with single embryo transfer (SET) in a surrogacy setting, this approach could improve pregnancy rates, minimize miscarriage risk, and limit multiple gestations. Even without PGS, pregnancy rates for IVF surrogacy cases are generally satisfactory, especially when treatment utilizes embryos derived from young oocytes and transferred to a healthy surrogate. However, there could be a more general role for PGS in surrogacy, since background aneuploidy in embryos remains a major factor driving implantation failure and miscarriage for all infertility patients. At present, the proportion of IVF cases involving GS is limited, while the number of IVF patients requesting PGS appears to be increasing. In this report, the relevance of PGS for surrogacy in the rapidly changing field of assisted fertility medicine is discussed. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 108:98–102, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Risk,parental autonomy and the epistemic divide: preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the Australian print news media, 1990–2007

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a reproductive/genetic technology which has become the subject of public and scholarly debate because it involves the evaluation and consequent selection (and implantation) or destruction of human embryos. This research investigates the way PGD is constituted in the Australian print news media. Foucauldian discourse analysis reveals that proponents draw on their direct knowledge and experience of PGD to support their claims. There is an epistemic divide between consumers and others claiming direct knowledge, and critics and others drawing on indirect or abstract understandings of PGD. This divide characterizes the discourses present in the data and is directly linked to changes in these over the period under analysis.     

Biopsy of Human Morula-Stage Embryos: Outcome of 215 IVF/ICSI Cycles with PGS

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is commonly performed on biopsies from 6–8-cell-stage embryos or blastocyst trophectoderm obtained on day 3 or 5, respectively. Day 4 human embryos at the morula stage were successfully biopsied. Biopsy was performed on 709 morulae from 215 ICSI cycles with preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), and 3–7 cells were obtained from each embryo. The most common vital aneuploidies (chromosomes X/Y, 21) were screened by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). No aneuploidy was observed in 72.7% of embryos, 91% of those developed to blastocysts. Embryos were transferred on days 5–6. Clinical pregnancy was obtained in 32.8% of cases, and 60 babies were born. Patients who underwent ICSI/PGS treatment were compared with those who underwent standard ICSI treatment by examining the percentage of blastocysts, pregnancy rate, gestational length, birth height and weight. No significant differences in these parameters were observed between the groups. Day 4 biopsy procedure does not adversely affect embryo development in vitro or in vivo. The increased number of cells obtained by biopsy of morulae might facilitate diagnostic screening. There is enough time after biopsy to obtain PGD results for embryo transfer on day 5–6 in the current IVF cycle.     

Review: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as a reproductive option in patients with neurodegenerative disorders

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was introduced in the late 1980s and represents an option for couples at risk of transmitting an inherited, debilitating or neurological disorder to their children. From a cleavage or blastocyst stage embryo, cell(s) are collected and then genetically analyzed for disease; enabling an unaffected embryo to be transferred into the uterus cavity. Nowadays, PGD has been carried out for several hundreds of heritable conditions including myotonic dystrophy, and for susceptibility genes involved in cancers of the nervous system. Currently, advanced molecular technologies with better resolution, such as array comparative genomic hybridisation, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and next generation sequencing, are on the verge of becoming the gold standard in embryo preimplantation screening. Given this, it may be time for neurological societies to consider the published evidence to develop new guidelines for the integration of PGD into modern preventative neurology. Therefore, the main aim of this review is to illustrate the option of PGD to enable conception of an unaffected baby, and to assist clinicians and neurologists in the counseling of the patient at risk of transmitting an inherited disease, to explore the genetic journey throughout in vitro fertilization IVF with PGD.     

PID in der Reproduktionsmedizin

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in assisted reproduction Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) describes the biopsy of one or more cells of an in vitro fertilized embryo and its genetical analysis before the transfer of the embryo into the uterus. Since the modification of the Embryonenschutzgesetz a PGD can be lawfully performed in Germany. Several diagnostic methods can be performed: FISH for the detection of maternal translocations on polar bodies, at the moment the most applied the array‐CGH for the screening of aneuploidies and the detection of translocations and also in the case of monogenic diseases PCR followed by sequencing. In the near future next generation sequencing will possibly replace all mentioned methods.     

‘Saviour Siblings’? The Distinction between PGD with HLA Tissue Typing and Preimplantation HLA Tissue Typing

One of the more controversial uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) involves selecting embryos with a specific tissue type so that the child to be born can act as a donor to an existing sibling who requires a haematopoietic stem cell transplant. PGD with HLA tissue typing is used to select embryos that are free of a familial genetic disease and that are also a tissue match for an existing sibling who requires a transplant. Preimplantation HLA tissue typing occurs when parents select embryos that are not at risk of a familial genetic disease to be a match for an existing sibling who requires a transplant. In Victoria, Australia, applications to use PGD with HLA tissue typing are reviewed by the Infertility Treatment Authority on a case by case basis. Preimplantation HLA tissue typing is prohibited prima facie because the embryo to be tested would not be at risk for a genetic abnormality or disease. Arguments for or against the use of PGD/HLA tissue typing are based on several key issues including the commodification and welfare of the donor child. This essay aims to show that that the same arguments apply to both PGD with HLA tissue typing and Preimplantation HLA tissue typing, and that the policy distinction between the two procedures is therefore ethically inconsistent.     

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Saudi Arabia

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) testing is the practice of obtaining a cellular biopsy sample from a developing human oocyte or embryo, acquired via a cycle of in vitro fertilization (IVF); evaluating the genetic composition of this sample; and using this information to determine which embryos will be optimal for subsequent uterine transfer. PGD has become an increasingly useful adjunct to IVF procedures. The ability to provide couples who are known carriers of genetic abnormalities the opportunity to deliver healthy babies has opened a new frontier in reproductive medicine. The purpose of the PGD is enables us to choose which embryos will be implanted into the mother. In the present study 137 families who had undergone IVF at Habib Medical Centre, were enrolled for the PGD analysis. The couple visited the clinic for the sex selection, recurrent fetal loss and with the recurrent IVF failure. 802 embryos were tested by the biopsy method and 512 are found to be normal and 290 were abnormal embryos. In this study only 24% of the embryos were transferred and the remaining was not transferred because of the abnormalities or undesired sex of the embryos. The structural and numerical abnormalities were found to be 16.8%.     

A blastocyst biopsy approach for preimplantation genetic diagnosis technique that affects the expression of SNAP-α in mice

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a technique that is commonly used during assisted reproduction in the clinics to eliminate genetically abnormal embryos before implantation. The blastomere biopsy technique has risks related to the embryo, but blastocyst biopsy has not been systematically evaluated in relation to effects after birth, and the resulting offspring have not been followed up on. We designed a series of experiments to evaluate the risk of blastocyst biopsy on the resulting progeny. Mice were divided into a PGD group and a control group. The former was the progeny of mice that underwent blastocyst biopsy and the latter was delivered through a normal pregnancy without blastocyst biopsy. Each group consisted of 15 animals. We found no effects of blastocyst biopsy on reproductive capacities and weight gain. As for neurobehavioral evaluation between both groups, there were no significant differences in tail suspension test, sucrose preference test, the open field test and the elevated plus maze. Western blotting, immunohistochemistry and quantitative RT-PCR results showed that the expression levels of MBP, PRDX5 and UCHL1 in the PGD group were not significantly different compared to the control group, but SNAP-α expression in the PGD group was lower than that in control group. In summary, we concluded that blastocyst biopsy had no adverse effect on the general growth and behavior in mice. However, blastocyst biopsy effected the expression of SNAP-α. Therefore, the safety of blastocyst biopsy requires further evaluation.     

Comparative results of preimplantation genetic screening by array comparative genomic hybridization and new-generation sequencing

Aneuploidies as quantitative chromosome abnormalities are a main cause of failed development of morphologically normal embryos, implantation failures, and early reproductive losses. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) allows a preselection of embryos with a normal karyotype, thus increasing the implantation rate and reducing the frequency of early pregnancy loss after IVF. Modern PGS technologies are based on a genome-wide analysis of the embryo. The first pilot study in Russia was performed to assess the possibility of using semiconductor new-generation sequencing (NGS) as a PGS method. NGS data were collected for 38 biopsied embryos and compared with the data from array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH). The concordance between the NGS and array-CGH data was 94.8%. Two samples showed the karyotype 47,XXY by array-CGH and a normal karyotype by NGS. The discrepancies may be explained by loss of efficiency of array-CGH amplicon labeling.     

Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Is there a case in favour of germline interventions?

CRISPR is widely considered to be a disruptive technology. However, when it comes to the most controversial topic, germline genome editing (GGE), there is no consensus on whether this technology has any substantial advantages over existing procedures such as embryo selection after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Answering this question, however, is crucial for evaluating whether the pursuit of further research and development on GGE is justified. This paper explores the question from both a clinical and a moral viewpoint, namely whether GGE has any advantages over existing technologies of selective reproduction and whether GGE could complement or even replace them. In a first step, I review an argument of extended applicability. The paper confirms that there are some scenarios in which only germline intervention allows couples to have (biologically related) healthy offspring, because selection will not avoid disease. In a second step, I examine possible moral arguments in favour of genetic modification, namely that GGE could save some embryos and that GGE would provide certain benefits for a future person that PGD does not. Both arguments for GGE have limitations. With regard to the extended applicability of GGE, however, a weak case in favour of GGE should still be made.     

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of β-thalassemia using real-time polymerase chain reaction with fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is employed increasingly to allow transfer of embryos to the uterus in assisted reproduction procedures. There are three stages of biopsy: polar bodies, one or two blastomeres from the cleavage-stage embryos, and trophectoderm cells (∼5 cells) from the blastocyst-stage embryos. Validation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays are challenging because only limited genetic material can be obtained for PGD. In the current study, we modified a valid single-cell PCR protocol for PGD using real-time PCR assay with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) hybridization probes followed by melting curve analysis. We optimized and clinically applied the protocol, permitting molecular genetic analysis to amplify a specific region on the beta-globin (HBB) gene for a couple, carriers of two mutations: c.-78A>G and c.52A>T. Among a total of eight embryos obtained after ovarian stimulation, a single blastomere per embryo at the six- to eight-cell stage was biopsied. This PGD method showed that four embryos were unaffected, two embryos were selected for transfer, and one pregnancy was achieved. Finally, a healthy male baby was delivered at 38 weeks’ gestation. The results obtained using the new method, FRET hybridization probes, were compared with findings using an existing method, primer extension minisequencing.     

从植入前遗传学诊断异常的胚胎中分离人胚胎干细胞系

在体外受精过程中,通过胚胎植入前遗传性诊断（PGD）对有遗传风险患者的胚胎进行植入前活检和遗传学分析,选择无遗传性疾病的胚胎植入子宫,而PGD诊断异常的胚胎则会被丢弃。本研究尝试将PGD异常胚胎用于分离人胚胎干细胞,以获得携带遗传缺陷的人胚胎干细胞系。利用荧光原位杂交技术对第3-5天胚胎进行PGD检测,结果异常的胚胎进一步用于分离获取胚胎干细胞系,然后对h ES细胞系进行核型及干细胞表面标记、多能性基因表达、端粒酶活性以及分化能力等特征性鉴定。总共从13个PGD异常胚胎中分离获得8个人胚胎干细胞系,建系效率为61.5%,其中1个核型正常,5个核型异常。说明利用PGD异常胚胎可以获得携带遗传缺陷的人胚胎干细胞系,不仅为评估PGD技术临床结论的准确性提供了一种新方法,更重要的是为研究各种遗传性疾病的发病机理提供了有效的细胞模型。     

Current status of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Japan

This is a retrospective study aimingto clarify the current status of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in Japan. Our data were collected from 12 facilities between September 2004 and September 2012, and entered into a database. A majority of PGD in Japan was performed for balanced structural chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent miscarriage. PGD for monogenic diseases was performed only in two facilities. The average maternal age was 38 years for monogenic diseases and 40 years for chromosomal abnormalities. Overall there have been671 cycles to oocyte retrieval reported. Of these cycles, 85% (572 cycles)were for chromosomal abnormalities, and 15% (99 cycles) for monogenic diseases. Diagnosis rates in the current study were 70.8% for monogenic diseases and 94.0% for chromosomal abnormalities. Rates of embryo transfer of PGD were 62.7% for monogenic diseases and 25.5% for chromosomal abnormalities. Clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were 12.0% for monogenic diseases and 35.6% for chromosomal abnormalities. Our study is the first PGD report from all facilities which had the approval of the ethics committee of the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. We have built a basis for gathering continuous PGD data in Japan.     

Blastomere removal from cleavage-stage mouse embryos alters steroid metabolism during pregnancy

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a genetic screening of embryos conceived with assisted reproduction technologies (ART). A single blastomere from an early-stage embryo is removed and molecular analyses follow to identify embryos carrying genetic defects. PGD is considered highly successful for detecting genetic anomalies, but the effects of blastomere biopsy on fetal development are understudied. We aimed to determine whether single blastomere removal affects steroid homeostasis in the maternal-placental-fetal unit during mouse pregnancy. Embryos generated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) were biopsied at the four-cell stage, cultured to morula/early blastocyst, and transplanted into the oviducts of surrogate mothers. Nonbiopsied embryos from the same IVF cohorts served as controls. Cesarean section was performed at term, and maternal and fetal tissues were collected. Embryo biopsy affected the levels of steroids (estradiol, estrone, and progesterone) in fetal and placental compartments but not in maternal tissues. Steroidogenic enzyme activities (3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, cytochrome P450 17alpha-hydroxylase, and cytochrome P450 19) were unaffected but decreased activities of steroid clearance enzymes (uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase and sulfotransferase) were observed in placentas and fetal livers. Although maternal body, ovarian, and placental weights did not differ, the weights of fetuses derived from biopsied embryos were lower than those of their nonbiopsied counterparts. The data demonstrate that blastomere biopsy deregulates steroid metabolism during pregnancy. This may have profound effects on several aspects of fetal development, of which low birth weight is only one. If a similar phenomenon occurs in humans, it may explain low birth weights associated with PGD/ART and provide a plausible target for improving PGD outcomes.     

Refining the ethics of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: A plea for contextualized proportionality

Many European countries uphold a ‘high risk of a serious condition’ requirement for limiting the scope of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). This ‘front door’ rule should be loosened to account for forms of PGD with a divergent proportionality. This applies to both ‘added PGD’ (aPGD), as an add‐on to in vitro fertilization (IVF), and ‘combination PGD’ (cPGD), for a secondary disorder in addition to the one for which the applicants have an accepted PGD indication. Thus loosening up at the front has implications at the back of PGD treatment, where a further PGD rule says that ‘affected embryos’ (in the sense of embryos with the targeted mutation or abnormality) should not be transferred to the womb. This ‘back door’ rule should be loosened to allow for transferring ‘last chance’ affected embryos in aPGD and cPGD cases, provided this does not entail a high risk that the child will have a seriously diminished quality of life.     

Setting up equine embryo gender determination by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a commercial embryo transfer program

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows identifying genetic traits in early embryos. Because in some equine breeds, like Polo Argentino, females are preferred to males for competition, PGD can be used to determine the gender of the embryo before transfer and thus allow the production of only female pregnancies. This procedure could have a great impact on commercial embryo production programs. The present study was conducted to adapt gender selection by PGD to a large-scale equine embryo transfer program. To achieve this, we studied (i) the effect on pregnancy rates of holding biopsied embryos for 7 to 10 hours in holding medium at 32 °C before transfer, (ii) the effect on pregnancy rates of using embryos of different sizes for biopsy, and (iii) the efficiency of amplification by heating biopsies before polymerase chain reaction. Equine embryos were classified by size (≤300, 300–1000, and >1000 μm), biopsied, and transferred 1 to 2 or 7 to 10 hours after flushing. Some of the biopsy samples obtained were incubated for 10 minutes at 95 °C and the rest remained untreated. Pregnancy rates were recorded at 25 days of gestation; fetal gender was determined using ultrasonography and compared with PGD results. Holding biopsied embryos for 7 to 10 hours before transfer produced pregnancy rates similar to those for biopsied embryos transferred within 2 hours (63% and 57%, respectively). These results did not differ from pregnancy rates of nonbiopsied embryos undergoing the same holding times (50% for 7–10 hours and 63% for 1–2 hours). Pregnancy rates for biopsied and nonbiopsied embryos did not differ between size groups or between biopsied and nonbiopsied embryos within the same size group (P > 0.05). Incubating biopsy samples for 10 minutes at 95 °C before polymerase chain reaction significantly increased the diagnosis rate (78.5% vs. 45.5% for treated and nontreated biopsy samples respectively). Gender determination using incubated biopsy samples matched the results obtained using ultrasonography in all pregnancies assessed (11/11, 100%); untreated biopsy samples were correctly diagnosed in 36 of 41 assessed pregnancies (87.8%), although the difference between treated and untreated biopsy samples was not significant. Our results demonstrated that biopsied embryos can remain in holding medium before being transferred, until gender diagnosis by PGD is complete (7–10 hours), without affecting pregnancy rates. This simplifies the management of an embryo transfer program willing to incorporate PGD for gender selection, by transferring only embryos of the desired sex. Embryo biopsy can be performed in a clinical setting on embryos of different sizes, without affecting their viability. Additionally, we showed that pretreating biopsy samples with a short incubation at 95 °C improved the overall efficiency of embryo sex determination.     

Präimplantationsdiagnostik für monogen vererbte Erkrankungen

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) today is worldwide a well established alternative option to prenatal diagnosis for families with Mendelian disorders. The clinical pregnancy rates obtained at good PGD centers correspond to those of regular intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles without genetic testing during fertility treatment. Prior to PGD for monogenic inherited disorders a comprehensive non-directive counseling of the interested couple on the possibilities of PGD is required, but also on its risks and limitations, covering both, genetic aspects as well as reproductive medicine. The performing PGD center has to provide reliable interdisciplinary medical care as well as quality management for the genetics and IVF laboratory including their interface, accounting for the particular requirements of single-cell genetic testing.     

Prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis: decision tree, new practices?

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) purpose is to assess the genetic status of 3 day-old embryos. PGD offers thus to couples "at-risk" of a genetic disorder an earlier option to prenatal diagnosis (PND). At the beginning, PGD's indications, patients and law were very closed to PND, but PGD specificities are gradually raising. Particularly, indications vary considerably in countries where the absence of law authorizes all the practices. Some of these applications are moreover raising serious ethical issues. Even in France, where this activity is particularly supervised, the recent modification to the law marks this evolution.     

Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Meiotic errors during oocyte maturation are considered the major contributors to embryonic aneuploidy and failures in human IVF treatment. Various technologies have been developed to screen polar bodies, blastomeres and trophectoderm cells for chromosomal aberrations. Array-CGH analysis using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays is widely applied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using single cells. Recently, an increase in the pregnancy rate has been demonstrated using array-CGH to evaluate trophectoderm cells. However, in some countries, the analysis of embryonic cells is restricted by law. Therefore, we used BAC array-CGH to assess the impact of polar body analysis on the live birth rate. A disadvantage of polar body aneuploidy screening is the necessity of the analysis of both the first and second polar bodies, resulting in increases in costs for the patient and complex data interpretation. Aneuploidy screening results may sometimes be ambiguous if the first and second polar bodies show reciprocal chromosomal aberrations. To overcome this disadvantage, we tested a strategy involving the pooling of DNA from both polar bodies before DNA amplification. We retrospectively studied 351 patients, of whom 111 underwent polar body array-CGH before embryo transfer. In the group receiving pooled polar body array-CGH (aCGH) analysis, 110 embryos were transferred, and 29 babies were born, corresponding to live birth rates of 26.4% per embryo and 35.7% per patient. In contrast, in the control group, the IVF treatment was performed without preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). For this group, 403 embryos were transferred, and 60 babies were born, resulting in live birth rates of 14.9% per embryo and 22.7% per patient. In conclusion, our data show that in the aCGH group, the use of aneuploidy screening resulted in a significantly higher live birth rate compared with the control group, supporting the benefit of PGS for IVF couples in addition to the suitability and effectiveness of our polar body pooling strategy.