Nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor ligands

Nociceptin (NC), alias Orphanin FQ (OFQ) is a heptadecapeptide structurally related to opioid peptides, especially Dynorphin A, which, however, does not interact with classic opioid receptors. NC selectively activates its own receptor (OP(4)), which has been shown to be insensitive to the naturally occurring opioid peptides as well as to a large number of non-peptide opioid receptor ligands, including naloxone. Thus, the NC/OP(4) system represents a new peptide-based signaling pathway, which is pharmacologically distinct from the opioid systems. The pharmacological tools available for investigating NC actions are at present rather limited and include: 1) peptide ligands obtained from structure activity studies performed using NC(1-13)NH(2) as a template or discovered by screening peptide combinatorial libraries; 2) nonpeptide ligands that are either molecules already known to interact with classic opioid receptors or novel molecules designed and synthesized as selective ligands of the OP(4) receptor. In the present paper the functional data obtained from both in vitro and in vivo studies with each relevant OP(4) receptor ligand will be analyzed and discussed comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each molecule. We hope that the present work will aid investigators, working in the NC/OP(4) field, in the choice of the pharmacological tools suitable for their experiments.     

Structure-activity relationships of nociceptin and related peptides: comparison with dynorphin A

Nociceptin and its receptor (OP(4)) share sequence homologies with the opioid peptide ligand dynorphin A and its receptor OP(2). Cationic residues in the C-terminal sequence of both peptides seem to be required for selective receptor occupation, but the number and the distribution of these basic residues are different and quite critical. Both receptors are presumably activated by the peptides N-terminal sequence (Xaa-Gly Gly-Phe, where Xaa = Phe or Tyr); however, although OP(4) requires Phe(4) as a determinant pharmacophore, OP(2) requires Tyr(1) as do the other opioid receptors. An extensive structure-activity analysis of the N-terminal tetrapeptide has led to conclude that the presence of aromatic residues in position one and four, preferably Phe, as well as the distance between Phe(1) and Phe(4) are extremely critical for occupation and activation of OP(4) in contrast with other opioid receptors (e.g. OP(1), OP(3), OP(2)). Modification of distance between the side chains of Phe(1) and Phe(4) (as obtained with Nphe(1) substitution in both NC and NC(1-13)-NH(2)) and/or conformational orientation of Phe(1) (as in Phe(1)psi(CH(2)-NH)-Gly(2)) has brought to discovery of pure antagonist ([Nphe(1)]-NC(1-13)-NH(2)) and a partial agonist ([Phe(1) psi(CH(2)-NH)-Gly(2)]-NC(1-13)-NH(2)), which have allowed us to characterize and classify the OP(4) receptor in several species. Thus, although antagonist activities at the OP(4) receptor are obtained by chemical modification of Phe(1)-Gly(2) peptide bond or by a shift of Phe(1) side chain of NC peptides, antagonism at the OP(2) receptor requires the diallylation of the N-terminal amino function, for instance, of dynorphin A. These considerations support the interpretation that the two systems nociceptin/OP(4) and dynorphin A/OP(2) are distinct pharmacological entities that differs in both their active sites (Tyr(1) for Dyn A and Phe(4) for NC) and the number and position of cationic residues in the C-terminal portions of the molecules. The chemical features of novel OP(4) receptor ligands either pseudopeptides obtained by combinatorial library screening or molecules of nonpeptide structure are reported and discussed in comparison with NC and NC related peptides.     

Calmodulin binding to G protein-coupling domain of opioid receptors.

The ubiquitous intracellular Ca(2+) sensor calmodulin (CaM) regulates numerous proteins involved in cellular signaling of G protein-coupled receptors, but most known interactions between GPCRs and CaM occur downstream of the receptor. Using a sequence-based motif search, we have identified the third intracellular loop of the opioid receptor family as a possible direct contact point for interaction with CaM, in addition to its established role in G protein activation. Peptides derived from the third intracellular loop of the mu-opioid (OP(3)) receptor strongly bound CaM and were able to reduce binding interactions observed between CaM and immunopurified OP(3) receptor. Functionally, CaM reduced basal and agonist-stimulated (35)S-labeled guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate incorporation, a measure of G protein activation, in membranes containing recombinant OP(3) receptor. Changes in CaM membrane levels as a result of overexpression or antisense CaM suppression inversely affected basal and agonist-induced G protein activation. The ability of CaM to abolish high affinity binding sites of an agonist at OP(3) further supports the hypothesis of a direct interaction between CaM and opioid receptors. An OP(3) receptor mutant with a Lys(273) --> Ala substitution (K273A-OP(3)), an amino acid predicted to play a critical role in CaM binding based on motif structure, was found to be unaffected by changes in CaM levels but coupled more efficiently to G proteins than the wild-type receptor. Stimulation of both the OP(1) (delta-opioid) and OP(3) wild-type receptors, but not the K273A-OP(3) mutant, induced release of CaM from the plasma membrane. These results suggest that CaM directly competes with G proteins for binding to opioid receptors and that CaM may itself serve as an independent second messenger molecule that is released upon receptor stimulation.     

Nociceptin, OP4 receptor ligand in different models of experimental epilepsy

The anticonvulsive activity of nociceptin, endogenous OP4 receptors agonist was investigated in pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), N-methyl D-aspartic acid (NMDA), bicucculine (BCC) and electrically evoked seizure models of experimental epilepsy. Nociceptin, at the dose of 10 nmol, suppressed the clonic seizures induced by PTZ, NMDA and BCC. [Phe1(psi)(CH2-NH)Gly2]nociceptin-(1-13)-NH2 which has been proposed to be selective antagonist OP4 receptors, did not prevent the action of nociceptin. The effect of [Phe1(psi)(CH2-NH)Gly2]nociceptin-(1-13)-NH2 on seizures induced by PTZ, NMDA and BCC was very similar to that of nociceptin. These data support the hypothesis that it possesses agonistic properties. Naloxone did not reverse the anticonvulsive action of nociceptin as well as [Phe1(psi)(CH2-NH)Gly2]nociceptin-(1-13)-NH2 which excludes the participation of opioid receptor in this action. On the other hand in the electroconvulsive model of generalized seizures, nociceptin as well as [Phe1(psi)(CH2-NH)Gly2]nociceptin-(1-13)-NH2 influenced neither the electroconvulsive threshold nor the maximal electroshock test. The data suggest that nociceptin and [Phe1(psi)(CH2-NH)Gly2]nociceptin-(1-13)-NH2 can exert anticonvulsive action. These properties depend on OP4 but not opioid receptors activation.     

Lack of the nociceptin receptor does not affect acute or chronic nociception in mice

The peptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and its receptor ORL-1, also designated opioid receptor 4 (OP(4)) are involved in the modulation of nociception. Using OP(4)-knockout mice, we have studied their response following opioid receptor stimulation and under neuropathic conditions.In vas deferens from wild-type and OP(4)-knockout mice, DAMGO (mu/OP(3) agonist), deltorphine II (delta/OP(1) agonist) and (-)-U-50488 (kappa/OP(2) agonist) induced similar concentration-dependent inhibition of electrically-evoked contractions. Naloxone and naltrindole (delta/OP(1) antagonists) shifted the curves of DAMGO (pA(2)=8.6) and deltorphine II (pA(2)=10.2) to the right, in each group. In the hot-plate assay, N/OFQ (10 nmol per mouse, i.t.) increased baseline latencies two-fold in wild-type mice while morphine (10mg/kg, s.c.), deltorphine II (10 nmol per mouse, i.c.v.) and dynorphin A (20 nmol per mouse, i.c.v.) increased hot-plate latencies by about four- to five-fold with no difference observed between wild-type and knockout mice. Furthermore, no change was evident in the development of the neuropathic condition due to chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve, after both thermal and mechanical stimulation.Altogether these results suggest that the presence of OP(4) receptor is not crucial for (1) the development of either acute or neuropathic nociceptive responses, and for (2) the regulation of full receptor-mediated responses to opioid agonists, even though compensatory mechanisms could not be excluded.     

正常猕猴与树鼩神经系统和免疫系统组织中大麻素与阿片受体的表达

为应用猕猴和树鼩动物模型研究毒品成瘾对神经/免疫系统的影响提供基础数据,对大麻素及阿片受体在正常猕猴和树鼩神经系统和免疫系统的表达进行初步确定.采集正常猕猴和树鼩新鲜组织(皮质、小脑、脑干、海马、脊髓、脾脏),应用半定量逆转录PCR和实时定量PCR的方法检测大麻素与阿片受体mRNA在猕猴和树鼩各组织中的表达情况.猕猴脑部各区包括脾脏均表达大麻索受体1(CNR1),而大麻素受体2(CNR2)只表达于脾脏内.三类阿片受体中,mu(μ)受体表达最为广泛,在以上各组织中均有表达;delta(δ)受体表达的组织最少,只在海马表达;kappa(κ)受体表达介于两者之间,分别在皮质、小脑、脑干、脊髓中表达.在树鼩组织中,CNR1和CNR2表达于整个大脑重要脑区中,且CNR1表达量高于同一区域内CNR2表达的鼍:脾脏中CNR2的表达较高,而CNR1不表达.三类阿片受体只有检测到μ受体在脑部与脾脏表达,且在各个脑区的表达量明显高于脾脏的表达量;δ体和κ受体在被检各个组织中均无表达.总体而言,两种大麻素受体在猕猴和树鼩体内表达情况与人类和鼠的情况类似,而三类阿片受体在猕猴体内表达情况与人类吏为接近.猕猴和树鼩可能可用于人类毒品成瘾的研究;猕猴在某些神经受体的表达更接近人类,其在研究毒品成瘾的机理和对免疫系统的影响方面仍有不可替代的地位.     

The cardiovascular responses to mu opioid agonist and antagonist in conscious normal and obese rats

Beta-endorphin decreases blood pressure in normal rats but increases blood pressure in obese rats. Since beta-endorphins can bind both mu opioid and kappa-opioid receptors we investigated the effect of a mu specific receptor agonist, D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) and a mu specific antagonist, D-Phe-Cys-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTAP) on cardiovascular responses in conscious control and obese rats. Rats were also implanted with telemetry transmitters and intracerebroventricular (ICV) cannulas for recording and peptide administration. The mu agonist, DAMGO, increased blood pressure (BP) in control rats. DAMGO also increased BP in obese rats but only at high concentrations. The heart rate responses paralleled the MAP responses. CTAP, the mu antagonist, paradoxically increased the MAP in both control and obese rats. The responsiveness to the mu agonist and antagonist was greater in controls. In other animals the brains were excised and the ventral medial hypothalamic area removed and mu receptor expression determined using PCR. The expression of mu opioid receptors was increased in obese rats. We conclude that the mu opioids can stimulate cardiovascular responses, but the excitatory responsiveness was not increased in conscious obese rats.     

Agonist-Selective Protection of the Opioid Receptor-Coupled G Proteins from Inactivation by 5''-p-fluorosulphonylbenzoyl Guanosine

The guanine nucleotide analogue, 5'-p-fluorosulphonylbenzoyl guanosine (FSBG), can react covalently with GTP-binding proteins (G proteins). In rat brain membranes, FSBG causes a time-dependent loss of beta,gamma-imido[8-3H]guanosine 5'-triphosphate binding sites. Using 1 mM FSBG, the guanyl nucleotide modulation of opioid agonist binding is abolished, whereas the guanyl nucleotide sensitivity of neurotensin binding is retained. The action of FSBG can be prevented by the presence of opioid agonists, but not the antagonist naloxone. Iodoacetamide treatment of membranes in the presence of agonist, but not antagonist, can attenuate the action of FSBG in blocking guanyl nucleotide modulation of opioid agonist binding. These results suggest that FSBG covalently modifies essential thiol groups, whose exposure to the reagent is modified by agonist occupancy of the receptor, on a species of G protein linked to opioid receptors, but not on a species of G protein linked to neurotensin receptors. Thus, FSBG may have selectivity for the forms of Gi or Go, proteins associated with opioid receptors.     

Modification by Cholecystokinin Octapeptide of the Binding ofμ-, δ-, and K-Opioid Receptors

Previous study has shown that cholecystokinin (CCK) octapeptide (CCK-8) suppressed the binding of opioid receptors to the universal opioid agonist [3H]etorphine. In the present study, highly selective tritium-labeled agonists for the mu-[(tryrosyl-3,5-3H][D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin ([3H]DAGO], delta- ([tyrosyl-3,5-3H][D-Pen2,5]enkephalin ([3H]DPDPE], and kappa- ([3H]U69,593) opioid receptors were used to clarify which type(s) of opioid receptor in rat brain homogenates is suppressed by CCK-8. In the competition experiments, CCK-8 suppressed the binding of [3H]DAGO and [3H]U69,593 but not that of [3H]DPDPE to the respective opioid receptor. This effect was blocked by the CCK antagonist proglumide at 1 mumol/L. In the saturation experiments, CCK-8 at concentrations of 0.1 nmol/L to 1 mumol/L decreased the Bmax of [3H]DAGO binding sites without affecting the KD; on the other hand, CCK-8 increased the KD of [3H]U69,593 binding without changing the Bmax. The results suggest that CCK-8 inhibits the binding of mu- and kappa-opioid receptors via the activation of CCK receptors.     

Upregulation of the opioid receptor complex by the chronic administration of morphine: a biochemical marker related to the development of tolerance and dependence.

Studies conducted after the development of the rapid filtration assay for opiate receptors, and before the recognition of multiple opioid receptors, failed to detect changes in opioid receptors induced by chronic morphine. Recent experiments conducted in our laboratories were designed to examine the hypothesis that only one of several opioid receptor types might be altered by chronic morphine. Using binding surface analysis and irreversible ligands to increase the "resolving power" of the ligand binding assay, the results indicated that chronic morphine increased both the Bmax and Kd of the opioid receptor complex, labeled with either [3H][D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin, [3H][D-Ala2-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin or [3H]6-desoxy-6 beta-fluoronaltreone. In the present study rats were pretreated with drugs known to attenuate the development of tolerance and dependence [the irreversible mu-receptor antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA), and the inhibitor of tryptophan hydroxylase, para-chlorophenylalanine], prior to subcutaneous implantation of morphine pellets. The results demonstrated that 1) unlike chronic naltrexone, beta-FNA failed to upregulate opioid receptors and 2) both beta-funaltrexamine and PCPA pretreatment attenuated the chronic morphine-induced increase in the Bmax, but not the Kd, of the opioid receptor complex. These results provide evidence that naltrex-one-induced upregulation of the opioid receptor complex might occur indirectly as a consequence of interactions at beta-funaltrexamine-insensitive opioid receptors and that morphine-induced upregulation (increased Bmax) of the opioid receptor complex is a relevant in vitro marker related to the development of tolerance and dependence. These data collectively support the hypothesis that endogenous antiopiate peptides play an important role in the development of tolerance and dependence to morphine.     

Modulation of sympathetic actions on the heart by opioid receptor stimulation

The sympathetic nervous system, the most important extrinsic regulatory mechanism of the heart, is inhibited postsynaptically and presynaptically by opioid peptides produced in the heart via their respective receptors. The cardiac actions of beta-adrenergic receptor (beta-AR) stimulation are attenuated by activation of the opioid receptor (OR) with OR agonist at ineffective concentrations, implying cross-talk between the OR and beta-AR. This cross-talk results from inhibition of the Gs protein and adenylyl cyclase of the beta-AR pathway by the pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein of the opioid pathway. Alterations in cross-talk between these two receptors occur in pathological situations to meet bodily needs. In myocardial ischemia, when the sympathetic activity is increased, the inhibition of beta-AR stimulation by kappa-opioid stimulation is also enhanced, thus reducing the workload, oxygen consumption and cardiac injury. Whereas cardiac responsiveness to sympathetic discharges is also reduced after chronic hypoxia, the cross-talk between kappa-OR and beta-AR is reduced to prevent undue suppression of the sympathetic influence on the heart. On the other hand, impairment of the cross-talk may result in abnormality. A lack or a significant reduction in the inhibition of beta-AR stimulation by kappa-OR stimulation may lead to an excessive increase in cardiac activities, which contribute to the maintenance of high arterial blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Other than opioid peptides, female sex hormone and adenosine also inhibit the sympathetic actions on the heart. In addition, sympathetic action is also inhibited presynaptically by kappa-opioid peptides via their receptor.     

Acetyl-RYYRIK-NH(2) is a highly efficacious OP(4) receptor agonist in the cardiovascular system of anesthetized rats

Nociceptin, the endogenous ligand of the OP₄ or ORL₁ (opioid receptor-like₁) receptor, decreases blood pressure and heart rate in anesthetized rats. Since the OP₄ receptor antagonist [Phe¹Ψ(CH₂-NH)Gly²]-nociceptin(1–13)NH₂ possesses an agonistic effect in this model, we examined whether other purported OP₄ receptor antagonists, acetyl-RYYRIK-NH₂ and naloxone benzoylhydrazone, antagonize the depressant effects of nociceptin. Acetyl-RYYRIK-NH₂, like nociceptin and [Phe¹Ψ(CH₂-NH)Gly²]-nociceptin(1–13)NH₂ and unlike naloxone benzoylhydrazone, decreased diastolic blood pressure and heart rate (rank order of potencies: nociceptin ≈ acetyl-RYYRIK-NH₂ [Phe¹Ψ(CH₂-NH)Gly²]-nociceptin(1–13)NH₂). The depressant effects were insensitive to the OP_1–3 receptor antagonist naloxone but diminished by naloxone benzoylhydrazone. In conclusion, the hypotensive and bradycardic effects of nociceptin in the anesthetized rat are mediated via OP₄ receptors, at which acetyl-RYYRIK-NH₂ is a highly potent and efficacious agonist.     

Effects of Cannabinoids on Dopamine Release in the Corpus Striatum and the Nucleus Accumbens In Vitro

Cannabinoid receptors are widely distributed in the nuclei of the extrapyramidal motor and mesolimbic reward systems; their exact functions are, however, not known. The aim of the present study was to characterize the effects of cannabinoids on the electrically evoked release of endogenous dopamine in the corpus striatum and the nucleus accumbens. In rat brain slices dopamine release elicited by single electrical pulses was determined by fast cyclic voltammetry. Dopamine release was markedly inhibited by the OP2 opioid receptor agonist U-50488 and the D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist quinpirole, indicating that our method is suitable for studying presynaptic modulation of dopamine release. In contrast, the CB1/CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonists WIN55212-2 (10(-6) M) and CP55940 (10(-6)-10(-5) M) and the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (10(-6) M) had no effect on the electrically evoked dopamine release in the corpus striatum and the nucleus accumbens. The lack of a presynaptic effect on terminals of nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons is in accord with the anatomical distribution of cannabinoid receptors: The perikarya of these neurons in the substantia nigra and the ventral tegmental area do not synthesize mRNA, and hence protein, for CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. It is therefore unlikely that presynaptic modulation of dopamine release in the corpus striatum and the nucleus accumbens plays a role in the extrapyramidal motor and rewarding effects of cannabinoids.     

Morphine tolerance in mice changes response of heroin from mu to delta opioid receptors

Heroin produced antinociception in the tail flick test through mu receptors in the brain of ICR and CD-1 mice, a response inhibited by 3-O-methylnaltrexone. Tolerance to morphine was produced by subcutaneous morphine pellet implantation. By the third day, the heroin response was produced through delta opioid receptors. The response was inhibited by simultaneous intracerebroventricular (i.c. v.) administration of naltrindole, a delta opioid receptor antagonist. More specifically, delta1 rather than delta2 receptors were involved because 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, a delta1 receptor antagonist, inhibited but naltriben, a delta2 antagonist, did not. Also, antinociception produced by i.c.v. heroin was inhibited by intrathecal administration of bicuculline and picrotoxin consistent with the concept that delta1 receptors in the brain mediated the antinociceptive response through descending neuronal pathways to the spinal cord to activate GABAA and GABAB receptors rather than spinal alpha2-adrenergic and serotonergic receptors activated originally by the mu agonist action in naive mice. The mu response of 6-monoacetylmorphine, a metabolite of heroin, was changed by morphine pellet implantation to a delta2 response (inhibited by naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone). The agonist action of morphine in these morphine-tolerant mice remained mu. Thus, the opioid receptor selectivity of heroin and 6-monoacetylmorphine in the brain is changed by production of tolerance to morphine. Such a change explains how morphine tolerant mice are not cross-tolerant to heroin.     

Comparison of the endogenous heptapeptide Met-enkephalin-Arg6-Phe7 binding in amphibian and mammalian brain

In previous communications [4, 38] we published that [3H]Met-enkephalin-Arg6-Phe7 (MERF) binds to opioid (kappa2 and delta) and sigma2 sites in frog and rat brain membrane preparations, however no binding to kappa1 sites could be established. In the present paper we compare the frog, rat and guinea pig brain membrane fractions with respect to their MERF binding data. No qualitative differences were found between the three species but specific binding of labelled MERF was maximal in frog brain and lowest in guinea pig brain, which corresponds to their kappa2 opioid receptor distribution. The naloxone resistant binding was also present in all investigated species and varied from 25% in frog and guinea pig cerebrum, to 50% in rat cerebrum and cerebellum, but no naloxone inhibition was found in guinea pig cerebellum where no kappa2 opioid receptors have been found. The presence of sigma2-like receptor was demonstrated in each investigated membrane fraction with displacement experiments using (-)N-allyl-normetazocine as competitor of tritiated MERF. It was shown that this site was responsible for 60-80% of [3H]MERF binding. The remaining part of the naloxone resistant labelled MERF binding could be displaced only with endogenous opioid peptides as met-enkephalin, dynorphin and beta-endorphin. The eventual physiological role of multiple MERF receptors is discussed.     

Co-expressions of different opioid receptor types differentially modulate their signaling via G(16)

Combinations of two different types of opioid receptors - delta-, kappa-, mu-opioid receptors (DOR, KOR, and MOR) and opioid receptor-like receptor 1 (ORL(1)) - were co-expressed with the alpha subunit of G(16) in COS-7 cells, and the ability of various selective agonists to induce activation of phospholipase Cbeta was examined. Nociceptin/orphanin FQ-induced response was enhanced when ORL(1) was co-expressed with MOR or KOR but not DOR. The kappa-agonist U50,488H induced a modest inositol phosphate formation when KOR was expressed alone or with MOR, but the response was attenuated when co-expressing with either DOR or ORL(1). It is suggested that the co-expressions of two different opioid receptor types indeed modify their downstream signaling events.