Expression of hunchback during trunk segmentation in the branchiopod crustacean Artemia franciscana

Comparative studies have shown that some aspects of segmentation are widely conserved among arthropods. Yet, it is still unclear whether the molecular prepatterns that are required for segmentation in Drosophila are likely to be similarly conserved in other arthropod groups. Homologues of the Drosophila gap genes, like hunchback, show regionally restricted expression patterns during the early phases of segmentation in diverse insects, but their expression patterns in other arthropod groups are not yet known. Here, we report the cloning of a hunchback orthologue from the crustacean Artemia franciscana and its expression during the formation of trunk segments. Artemia hunchback is expressed in a series of segmental stripes that correspond to individual thoracic/trunk, genital, and postgenital segments. However, this expression is not associated with the segmenting ectoderm but is restricted to mesodermal cells that associate with the ectoderm in a regular metameric pattern. All cells in the early segmental mesoderm appear to express hunchback. Later, mesodermal expression fades, and a complex expression pattern appears in the central nervous system (CNS), which is comparable to hunchback expression in the CNS of insects. No regionally restricted expression, reminiscent of gap gene expression, is observed during trunk segmentation. These patterns suggest that the expression patterns of hunchback in the mesoderm and in the CNS are likely to be ancient and conserved among crustaceans and insects. In contrast, we find no evidence for a conserved role of hunchback in axial patterning in the trunk ectoderm.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Engrailed</Emphasis> is expressed in larval development and in the radial nervous system of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Patiriella</Emphasis> sea stars

We documented expression of the pan-metazoan neurogenic gene engrailed in larval and juvenile Patiriella sea stars to determine if this gene patterns bilateral and radial echinoderm nervous systems. Engrailed homologues, containing conserved En protein domains, were cloned from the radial nerve cord. During development, engrailed was expressed in ectodermal (nervous system) and mesodermal (coeloms) derivatives. In larvae, engrailed was expressed in cells lining the larval and future adult coeloms. Engrailed was not expressed in the larval nervous system. As adult-specific developmental programs were switched on during metamorphosis, engrailed was expressed in the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system (PNS), paralleling the pattern of neuropeptide immunolocalisation. Engrailed was first seen in the developing nerve ring and appeared to be up-regulated as the nervous system developed. Expression of engrailed in the nerve plexus of the tube feet, the lobes of the hydrocoel along the adult arm axis, is similar to the reiterated pattern of expression seen in other animals. Engrailed expression in developing nervous tissue reflects its conserved role in neurogenesis, but its broad expression in the adult nervous system of Patiriella differs from the localised expression seen in other bilaterians. The role of engrailed in patterning repeated PNS structures indicates that it may be important in patterning the fivefold organisation of the ambulacrae, a defining feature of the Echinodermata.     

Caudal and even-skipped in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii and the ancestry of posterior growth

In order to address the question of the conservation of posterior growth mechanisms in bilaterians, we have studied the expression patterns of the orthologues of the genes caudal, even-skipped, and brachyury in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii. Annelids belong to the still poorly studied third large branch of the bilaterians, the lophotrochozoans, and have anatomic and developmental characteristics, such as a segmented body plan, indirect development through a microscopic ciliated larva, and building of the trunk through posterior addition, which are all hypothesized by some authors (including us) to be present already in Urbilateria, the last common ancestor of bilaterians. All three genes are shown to be likely involved in the building of the anteroposterior axis around the slit-like amphistomous blastopore as well as in the patterning of the terminal anus-bearing piece of the body (the pygidium). In addition, caudal and even-skipped are likely involved in the posterior addition of segments. Together with the emerging results on the conservation of segmentation genes, these results reinforce the hypothesis that Urbilateria had a segmented trunk developing through posterior addition.     

Expression, regulation and function of the homeobox gene empty spiracles in brain and ventral nerve cord development of Drosophila

We analyse the role of the empty spiracles (ems) gene in embryonic brain and ventral nerve cord development. ems is differentially expressed in the neurectoderm of the anterior head versus the trunk region of early embryos. A distal enhancer region drives expression in the deutocerebral brain anlage and a proximal enhancer region drives expression in the VNC and tritocerebral brain anlage. Mutant analysis indicates that in the anterior brain ems is necessary for regionalized neurogenesis in the deutocerebral and tritocerebral anlagen. In the posterior brain and VNC ems is necessary for correct axonal pathfinding of specific interneurons. Rescue experiments indicate that the murine Emx2 gene can partially replace the fly ems gene in CNS development.     

Hremx, the ascidian homologue of ems/emx, is expressed in the anterior and posterior-lateral epidermis but not in the central nervous system during embryogenesis

Recent comparative studies on expression patterns of homeobox genes in the development between ascidians and vertebrates have come to suggest a possibility that a common basic mechanism may exist in the patterning of the central nervous system (CNS). The ems/emx genes have been demonstrated to be involved in the formation and patterning of the anterior CNS in Drosophila and vertebrate embryos. In the present study, we have isolated and analyzed expression of Hremx, the ascidian homologue of ems/emx with particular attention to whether it is expressed in the larval ascidian CNS. Expression of Hremx was detected in the anterior trunk and lateral tail epidermis but not in the anterior CNS. The two expression domains of the epidermis responded in different ways upon treatment with retinoic acid: the anterior expression domain was unaltered, while the posterior expression domain extended to the anterior. The present result suggests that Hremx may have a function in anterior patterning but not in the patterning of the CNS in the ascidian embryo. We suggest the possibility that the function of ems/emx genes in the patterning of the anterior CNS in Drosophila and vertebrate embryos might have been acquired independently in the lineages to Drosophila and vertebrates.     

Expression of <Emphasis Type="Italic">hunchback</Emphasis> during oogenesis and embryogenesis in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Locusta migratoria manilensis</Emphasis> (Meyen)

hb (hunchback) is a contributing factor in anteroposterior axial patterning of insects. Although the hb function in Locusta migratoria manilensis has been investigated, its expression pattern remains unknown. Here, the mouse polyclonal antibody was produced against Hb fusion protein, and then its expression pattern during oogenesis and embryogenesis of L. migratoria manilensis was examined by immunohistochemical staining. Hb protein was detected in the oocyte nucleus which was positioned centrally within the developing oocyte. The oocyte nucleus gradually moved to the posterior end of the egg along with the oocyte maturing. In freshly laid eggs, Hb formed gradient at the posterior end of the egg, and then hb was expressed as a band in the middle of the blastodisc. As the blastodisc differentiated into the head and trunk, the expression region became wide, which would develop into spatial gnathal and thoracic segments. With abdominal segmentation, the expression domain in the gnathal and thoracic region became faint and eventually faded out, while the Hb expression domain appeared at the posterior growth zone in a discontinuous expression manner. The hb expression pattern of L. migratoria manilensis is greatly similar to that of other locusts, such as Schistocerca americana and another L. migratoria. Compared with other insects, hb expression is conserved in the gnathal and thoracic domains, while divergent in oogenesis and abdomen.     

Formation of the head-trunk boundary in the animal body plan: an evolutionary perspective

Gene expression analyses and anatomical studies suggest that the body plans of protostomes and deuterostomes are phylogenetically related. In the central nervous system (CNS), arthropods and vertebrates (as well as their closest related phyla the urochordates and cephalochordates) share a nerve cord with rostral specification: the cerebral neuromeres in Drosophila, cerebral sensory vesicle of ascidians and lancelets and the large brain of craniates. Homologous genes, in particular of the otd/Otx and Hox families, are at play in these species to specify the anterior and posterior CNS territories, respectively. In contrast, homologies in the establishment of boundary regions like those separating head and trunk structures in arthropods or mid- and hindbrain domains in chordates are still unclear. We compare in these species the formation, properties and molecular characteristics of these boundaries during embryonic development. We also discuss recent findings suggesting that insects and vertebrates might have co-opted factors of related families to control the formation of these boundary regions, the evolution of which would then appear dramatically different from that of the anterior and posterior CNS domains.     

Wnt8 is required for growth-zone establishment and development of opisthosomal segments in a spider

The Wnt genes encode secreted glycoprotein ligands that regulate many developmental processes from axis formation to tissue regeneration [1]. In bilaterians, there are at least 12 subfamilies of Wnt genes [2]. Wnt3 and Wnt8 are required for somitogenesis in vertebrates [3-7] and are thought to be involved in posterior specification in deuterostomes in general [8]. Although TCF and beta-catenin have been implicated in the posterior patterning of some short-germ insects [9, 10], the specific Wnt ligands required for posterior specification in insects and other protostomes remained unknown. Here we investigated the function of Wnt8 in a chelicerate, the common house spider Achaearanea tepidariorum[11]. Knockdown of Wnt8 in Achaearanea via parental RNAi caused misregulation of Delta, hairy, twist, and caudal and resulted in failure to properly establish a posterior growth zone and truncation of the opisthosoma (abdomen). In embryos with the most severe phenotypes, the entire opisthosoma was missing. Our results suggest that in the spider, Wnt8 is required for posterior development through the specification and maintenance of growth-zone cells. Furthermore, we propose that Wnt8, caudal, and Delta/Notch may be parts of an ancient genetic regulatory network that could have been required for posterior specification in the last common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes.     

Genomic and gene regulatory signatures of cryptozoic adaptation: Loss of blue sensitive photoreceptors through expansion of long wavelength-opsin expression in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum

Background

Hox genes are expressed in specific domains along the anterior posterior body axis and define the regional identity. In most animals these genes are organized in a single cluster in the genome and the order of the genes in the cluster is correlated with the anterior to posterior expression of the genes in the embryo. The conserved order of the various Hox gene orthologs in the cluster among most bilaterians implies that such a Hox cluster was present in their last common ancestor. Vertebrates are the only metazoans so far that have been shown to contain duplicated Hox clusters, while all other bilaterians seem to possess only a single cluster.

Results

We here show that at least three Hox genes of the spider Cupiennius salei are present as two copies in this spider. In addition to the previously described duplicated Ultrabithorax gene, we here present sequence and expression data of a second Deformed gene, and of two Sex comb reduced genes. In addition, we describe the sequence and expression of the Cupiennius proboscipedia gene. The spider Cupiennius salei is the first chelicerate for which orthologs of all ten classes of arthropod Hox genes have been described. The posterior expression boundary of all anterior Hox genes is at the tagma border of the prosoma and opisthosoma, while the posterior boundary of the posterior Hox genes is at the posterior end of the embryo.

Conclusion

The presence of at least three duplicated Hox genes points to a major duplication event in the lineage to this spider, perhaps even of the complete Hox cluster as has taken place in the lineage to the vertebrates. The combined data of all Cupiennius Hox genes reveal the existence of two distinct posterior expression boundaries that correspond to morphological tagmata boundaries.     

Identification and characterization of a fibroblast growth factor gene in the planarian Dugesia japonica

Planarians belong to the phylum Platyhelminthes and can regenerate their missing body parts after injury via activation of somatic pluripotent stem cells called neoblasts. Previous studies suggested that fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling plays a crucial role in the regulation of head tissue differentiation during planarian regeneration. To date, however, no FGF homologues in the Platyhelminthes have been reported. Here, we used a planarian Dugesia japonica model and identified an fgf gene termed Djfgf, which encodes a putative secreted protein with a core FGF domain characteristic of the FGF8/17/18 subfamily in bilaterians. Using Xenopus embryos, we found that DjFGF has FGF activity as assayed by Xbra induction. We next examined Djfgf expression in non-regenerating intact and regenerating planarians. In intact planarians, Djfgf was expressed in the auricles in the head and the pharynx. In the early process of regeneration, Djfgf was transiently expressed in a subset of differentiated cells around wounds. Notably, Djfgf expression was highly induced in the process of head regeneration when compared to that in the tail regeneration. Furthermore, assays of head regeneration from tail fragments revealed that combinatorial actions of the anterior extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and posterior Wnt/ß-catenin signaling restricted Djfgf expression to a certain anterior body part. This is the region where neoblasts undergo active proliferation to give rise to their differentiating progeny in response to wounding. The data suggest the possibility that DjFGF may act as an anterior counterpart of posteriorly localized Wnt molecules and trigger neoblast responses involved in planarian head regeneration.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Hau-Pax6A</Emphasis> expression in the central nervous system of the leech embryo

The leech Helobdella sp. (Austin) has two genes of the Pax6 subfamily, one of which is characterized in detail. Hau-Pax6A was expressed during embryonic development in a pattern similar to other bilaterian animals. RNA was detected in cellular precursors of the central nervous system (CNS) and in peripheral cells including a population associated with the developing eye. The CNS of the mature leech is a ventral nerve cord composed of segmental ganglia, and embryonic Hau-Pax6A expression was primarily localized to the N teloblast lineage that generates the majority of ganglionic neurons. Expression began when the ganglion primordia were four cells in length and was initially restricted to a single cell, n_s.a, whose descendants will form the ganglion’s anterior edge. At later stages, the Hau-Pax6A expression pattern expanded to include additional CNS precursors, including some descendants of the O teloblast. Expression persisted through the early stages of ganglion morphogenesis but disappeared from the segmented body trunk at the time of neuronal differentiation. The timing and iterated pattern of Hau-Pax6A expression in the leech embryo suggests that this gene may play a role in the segmental patterning of CNS morphogenesis.     

Do cnidarians have a ParaHox cluster? Analysis of synteny around a Nematostella homeobox gene cluster

SUMMARY The Hox gene cluster is renowned for its role in developmental patterning of embryogenesis along the anterior–posterior axis of bilaterians. Its supposed evolutionary sister or paralog, the ParaHox cluster, is composed of Gsx, Xlox, and Cdx, and also has important roles in anterior–posterior development. There is a debate as to whether the cnidarians, as an outgroup to bilaterians, contain true Hox and ParaHox genes, or instead the Hox‐like gene complement of cnidarians arose from independent duplications to those that generated the genes of the bilaterian Hox and ParaHox clusters. A recent whole genome analysis of the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis found conserved synteny between this cnidarian and vertebrates, including a region of synteny between the putative Hox cluster of N. vectensis and the Hox clusters of vertebrates. No syntenic region was identified around a potential cnidarian ParaHox cluster. Here we use different approaches to identify a genomic region in N. vectensis that is syntenic with the bilaterian ParaHox cluster. This proves that the duplication that gave rise to the Hox and ParaHox regions of bilaterians occurred before the origin of cnidarians, and the cnidarian N. vectensis has bona fide Hox and ParaHox loci.     

Expression of carp-cdx1, a caudal homolog,in embryos of the carp,Cyprinus carpio

A carp caudal cDNA of 1.3 kb was cloned after screening an early segmentation stage cDNA library with a probe produced by PCR using conserved homeobox sequences as primers and genomic DNA as template. The homeobox gene was called carp-cdxl. The gene appears highly similar to other vertebrate caudal homologs, especially the zebrafish gene cdx(Zf-cad). The possible relationship to homeobox genes within the Hox-C gene complexes is discussed. A weak expression of the gene, detected by in situ hybridization, was found shortly before gastrulation (at 25% epiboly) in cells likely to have a posterior fate. During gastrulation expression became stronger. At the early segmentation stage, cells of the neural keel in the area of the prospective spinal cord expressed the gene. During the progression of segmentation, expression retracted in a caudal direction. The tailbud expressed the gene throughout, but the somites lost expression shortly after their formation. Only the most lateral mesoderm cells maintained expression in the trunk area. Carp-cdxl was also expressed in the endoderm. At 24 h after fertilization the gene was only expressed in the tailbud. At 48 h, no expression could be detected. The expression pattern suggests a function for carp-cdxl in gastrulation and patterning along the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo.     

Hox and ParaHox genes: A review on molluscs

Hox and ParaHox genes are involved in patterning the anterior‐posterior body axis in metazoans during embryo development. Body plan evolution and diversification are affected by variations in the number and sequence of Hox and ParaHox genes, as well as by their expression patterns. For this reason Hox and ParaHox gene investigation in the phylum Mollusca is of great interest, as this is one of the most important taxa of protostomes, characterized by a high morphological diversity. The comparison of the works reviewed here indicates that species of molluscs, belonging to different classes, share a similar composition of Hox and ParaHox genes. Therefore evidence suggests that the wide morphological diversity of this taxon could be ascribed to differences in Hox gene interactions and expressions and changes in the Hox downstream genes rather than to Hox cluster composition. Moreover the data available on Hox and ParaHox genes in molluscs compared with those of other Lophotrochozoa shed light on the complex and controversial evolutionary histories that these genes have undergone within protostomes. genesis 52:935–945, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Growth differentiation factor 11 locally controls anterior–posterior patterning of the axial skeleton

Growth and differentiation factor 11 (GDF11) is a transforming growth factor β family member that has been identified as the central player of anterior–posterior (A–P) axial skeletal patterning. Mice homozygous for Gdf11 deletion exhibit severe anterior homeotic transformations of the vertebrae and craniofacial defects. During early embryogenesis, Gdf11 is expressed predominantly in the primitive streak and tail bud regions, where new mesodermal cells arise. On the basis of this expression pattern of Gdf11 and the phenotype of Gdf11 mutant mice, it has been suggested that GDF11 acts to specify positional identity along the A–P axis either by local changes in levels of signaling as development proceeds or by acting as a morphogen. To further investigate the mechanism of action of GDF11 in the vertebral specification, we used a Cdx2-Cre transgene to generate mosaic mice in which Gdf11 expression is removed in posterior regions including the tail bud, but not in anterior regions. The skeletal analysis revealed that these mosaic mice display patterning defects limited to posterior regions where Gdf11 expression is deficient, whereas displaying normal skeletal phenotype in anterior regions where Gdf11 is normally expressed. Specifically, the mosaic mice exhibited seven true ribs, a pattern observed in wild-type (wt) mice (vs. 10 true ribs in Gdf11^−/− mice), in the anterior axis and nine lumbar vertebrae, a pattern observed in Gdf11 null mice (vs. six lumbar vertebrae in wt mice), in the posterior axis. Our findings suggest that GDF11, rather than globally acting as a morphogen secreted from the tail bud, locally regulates axial vertebral patterning.