Predictors of random sextant biopsy outcome in screened men with PSA > 4 ng/mL and a negative sextant biopsy at previous screening. Experience in a population-based screening program in Florence

The aim of this study was to evaluate possible pedictors of the outcome of repeat random sextant biopsy of the prostate prompted by a rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Random biopsies performed for PSA elevation (>4 ng/mL) in the course of a randomized study of screening efficacy were reviewed, and 87 consecutive biopsies (carcinoma = 13, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia = 6, negative = 68) performed in subjects with a negative random biopsy at the previous screening round were considered. Findings at digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography and total PSA value were not useful predictors of repeat biopsy outcome, whereas PSA velocity was significantly associated with biopsy outcome. The positive predictive value for a cancer biopsy was 2.7% (1/36), 28.5% (2/7), and 22.7% (10/44) for PSA velocity values of <0.1, 0.1-0.19, and >0.19 ng/mL/yr, respectively. A cutoff of 0.1 ng/mL/yr for PSA velocity would have allowed to avoid approximately half (35/74 = 47.2%) of the benign biopsies while decreasing the sensitivity by 7.6% (1/13), and is thus suggested as a possible criterion for the indication of repeat random biopsy for persistent PSA elevation.     

Comparison of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in early detection of prostate cancer

This study compares the value of digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) determination in the detection of prostate cancer. 1,000 men aged > or = 50 from the Osijek surroundings were examined. The subjects with prostatitis were excluded from the study. The subjects with elevated concentration of total prostate specific antigen and/or digital rectal examination suspect of carcinoma underwent prostate biopsy. The rate of prostate cancer detection showed to be 3.3% for PSA > 4 ng/ml, 2% for abnormal finding of DRE, and 3.7% for combination of the two methods. Out of 35 patients with prostate cancer detected, 19 had suspect DRE finding and 32 had PSA exceeding 4 ng/ml. Thus, PSA pointed to the diagnosis of prostate cancer in 91.4%, and abnormal finding of DRE in 54.2% of cases, the difference being statistically significant. The positive predictive value was 48.7% for abnormal finding of DRE, 47% for PSA > 4 ng/ml, and 80.0% for the combination of both. Although PSA determination detected a considerable proportion of tumors missed on DRE, the former alone was found to be insufficient as a screening method because of its inadequate sensitivity. When combined with digital rectal examination, the probability of prostate cancer detection increased considerably.     

Predicting prostate biopsy outcome by findings at digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, PSA, PSA density and free-to-total PSA ratio in a population-based screening setting

The study offers a retrospective analysis of the positive predictive value (PPV) of several variables, i.e. digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), PSA value, PSA density (PSAD), and free/total PSA ratio (F/T), for the histologic outcome of 179 prostate biopsies performed within a population-based screening trial. The ratio of spared benign biopsies to missed cancers (SBB/MC) if biopsy results had been decided on the basis of single variables was also evaluated. PPV was 82.9% for DRE, 56.3% for TRUS, 26.6% for PSA (cutoff > or =4 ng/mL), 47.4% for PSA (cutoff > or =10 ng/mL), 42.0% for PSAD (cutoff 0.15), 59.2% for PSAD (cutoff 0.20), 34.9% for F/T (cutoff 0.20) and 40.0% for F/T (cutoff 0.15). SBB/MC was 121/23 for DRE, 96/12 for TRUS, 11/10 for PSA (cutoff > or =4 ng/mL), 107/34 for PSA (cutoff > or =10 ng/mL), 87/23 for PSAD (cutoff 0.15), 109/26 for PSAD (cutoff 0.20), 45/8 for F/T (cutoff 0.20) and 70/14 for F/T (cutoff 0.15). Multivariate analysis of the association with biopsy outcome showed the highest odds ratio for TRUS (13.24, 95% CI=4.4-30.7), and considerably lower values for DRE (4.17, 95% CI=2.0-8-9), PSAD (cutoff 0.20: 3.24, 95% CI=-1.8-5.7) and F/T (cutoff <0.15: 3.16, 95% CI=1.7-1.8). None of the possible variable combinations was clinically useful: the highest PPV (83.3%) was obtained with a combination of suspicious DRE/TRUS, PSAD >0.20 and F/T <0.15, which nevertheless missed 20 of 52 cancers.     

Developing a Follow-Up Strategy for Patients with PSA Ranging from 4 to 10 ng/ml via a New Model to Reduce Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop a follow-up strategy based on the new model to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) ranging from 4 to 10 ng/ml.

Methods

A total of 436 patients with PSA ranging from 4 to 10 ng/ml who had undergone transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy were evaluated during the first stage. Age, PSA, free PSA (fPSA), digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, ultrasonic hypoechoic mass, ultrasonic microcalcifications, prostate volume (PV) and PSA density (PSAD) were considered as predictive factors. A multiple logistic regression analysis involving a backward elimination selection procedure was applied to select independent predictors. After a comprehensive analysis of all results, we developed a new model to assess the risk of prostate cancer and an effective follow-up strategy.

Results

Age, PSA, PV, fPSA, rate of abnormal DRE findings and rate of hypoechoic masses detected by TRUS were included in our model. A significantly greater area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was obtained in our model when compared with using PSA alone (0.782 vs. 0.566). Patients were grouped according to the value of prostate cancer risk (PCaR). In the second stage of our study, patients with PCaR>0.52 were recommended to undergo biopsies immediately while the rest of the patients continued close follow-up observation. Compared with the first stage, the detection rate of PCa in the second stage was significantly increased (33.0% vs 21.1%, p = 0.012). There was no significant difference between the two stages in distribution of the Gleason score (p = 0.808).

Conclusions

We developed a follow-up strategy based on the new model, which reduced unnecessary prostate biopsies without delaying patients’ diagnoses and treatments.     

On the clinical usefulness of the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio

The free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio (F/T PSA) is associated with the presence of prostate cancer and is thus used as an indicator for suspicion of prostate cancer and as a determinant for biopsy. We reviewed a recent retrospective series of 966 consecutive prostate biopsies where F/T PSA was blindly determined and did not influence biopsy indication. We simulated the association of F/T PSA with biopsy outcome and its impact as a biopsy determinant. When adopting an F/T PSA cutoff of 10%, 13%, 16% or 20% among random sextant biopsies in the 4-10 ng/mL total PSA range, the sensitivity was 15%, 37%, 55% and 72% and the specificity 89%, 80%, 64% and 44%, respectively. Using F/T PSA as a biopsy determinant, from 1.7 to 2.6 cancer biopsies would have been delayed to avoid 10 benign biopsies. As this balance is not acceptable, F/T PSA has no role as a biopsy indicator and its clinical use is questionable.     

Prostate-specific antigen levels among cirrhotic patients

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients with liver cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and August 2001, 216 men with cirrhosis were evaluated. The extent of their liver disease was classified according to the Child-Pugh classification. Serum PSA levels were measured with the Hybritech Tandem-R RIA method and matched with age-related reference PSA levels. Digital rectal examination (DRE) was performed in all patients. Patients with elevated PSA levels and/or abnormal DRE were recommended to undergo further assessment including transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and biopsy performed by an urologist. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixteen men (mean age 54.09 +/- 9.09 years, range 25-76) with cirrhosis were examined. Their mean PSA value was 0.57 +/- 0.84 ng/mL and tended to be lower than in the normal population. The degree of PSA decrease was found to parallel the severity of the liver disease (p=0.002). The mean serum PSA level increased with each age decade in a statistically significant manner (p<0.001). Four patients (three with elevated PSA values) underwent prostate biopsy. Three biopsies were positive for prostate cancer, the other showed evidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). CONCLUSION: Serum PSA is influenced by the severity of liver disease and its levels tend to be lower in cirrhotic patients than in the normal population. However, serum PSA can still be considered a reliable marker in the clinical management of prostatic disease in patients with cirrhosis.     

Effect of antibiotic treatment on serum PSA and percent free PSA levels in patients with biochemical criteria for prostate biopsy and previous lower urinary tract infections

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to the influence of inflammatory foci on total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations. The objective was to analyze the biological variations of PSA and percent free PSA (%f-PSA) in patients with biochemical criteria for prostate biopsy (PSA higher than 4 ng/mL and normal rectal examination) and compare them with the variation induced by antibiotic treatment in a cohort of patients with a history of lower urinary tract infections and no clinical evidence of prostatitis. METHODS: Ninety patients with a history of lower urinary tract infections, non-suspicious digital rectal examination and PSA between 4 and 20 ng/mL were analyzed. PSA concentration and %f-PSA were determined. Forty-five patients were treated with three weeks of ofloxacin, following which marker determination was repeated. All patients underwent ultrasound-controlled transrectal six-core prostate biopsy. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients presented benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (30 with prostatitic foci) and 23 cancer. Significant variations in PSA (6.97 ng/mL vs. 5.82 ng/mL, p=0.001) and %f-PSA (14.84% vs. 17.53%, p=0.01) were found only in the treated patients. These differences were significant for patients with BPH-associated prostatitic foci and not for patients with BPH or cancer. The tendency was for PSA to decrease (15 treated patients with PSA <4 ng/mL vs. six non-treated patients) and for %f-PSA to increase. The median variation of %f-PSA was greater than that of PSA. When the cutoff for %f-PSA was set at 25%, 18.9% of unnecessary biopsies after the first determination and 20% after the second could be avoided. By associating the reduction in PSA, up to 46% could be avoided in treated patients. CONCLUSION: Biochemical criteria for prostate biopsy may be modified in patients with a history of lower urinary tract infections due to variations greater than those explained by intraindividual biological variations, and may be influenced by the antibiotic treatment. These results suggest that subclinical inflammatory foci may influence PSA and %f-PSA.     

Analysis of PSA velocity in 1666 healthy subjects undergoing total PSA determination at two consecutive screening rounds

The study purpose was to assess PSA velocity (PSAV) in healthy subjects in order to establish a reliable cutoff for the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer in a screening setting. We studied a series of 1666 healthy men aged 55 to 74 years undergoing two total PSA determinations at a four-year interval within a population-based randomized screening trial at the Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica of Florence. First and second screening round PSA assays (PSA1 and PSA2) were carried out with the same method and by the same laboratory. PSAV (PSA1-PSA2/year) was determined in non-cancer subjects in the overall series or in specific age and PSA subgroups, and in subjects with cancer detected at the second screening round. Average PSAV in 1648 non-cancer subjects was 0.07 ng/mL/year (range -2.18+5.99, 95% CI 0.05-0.09); at least one third of subjects showed a decrease in PSA (negative PSAV), mostly of limited magnitude and in the low PSA range. Average PSAV in the 18 cancer patients was 1.16 ng/mL/year (range 0.10-5.6, 95% CI 0.56-1.77), which is significantly higher (p<0.01) than in non-cancer subjects. None of the cancer patients showed a PSA decrease over time. Whatever cutoff was taken for PSAV, its power to discriminate cancer was limited: in particular the previously used PSAV cutoff of 0.75 ng/mL/year would have included only 42 of the 1648 non-cancer subjects (specificity 97.5%) but excluded eight of the 18 cancer patients (sensitivity 55.5%). At best, with the adopted screening protocol PSAV (cutoff 0.10 ng/mL/year) could have spared 27.9% of non-cancer subjects with PSA > or =2.5 ng/mL further diagnostic assessment and 22.7% of non-cancer subjects with PSA > or =4 ng/mL random sextant biopsy, while missing no cancers. This study provides a reliable estimate of PSAV based on a large unbiased population sample. PSAV is widely variable over time, particularly at low PSA values. PSAV might be of value as an indicator for diagnostic assessment and random sextant biopsy in a screening setting.     

Age-Specific Cutoff Value for the Application of Percent Free Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) in Chinese Men with Serum PSA Levels of 4.0–10.0 ng/ml

Objective

The influence of age on the performance of percent free prostate-specific antigen (%fPSA) in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) in East Asians is controversial. We tested the diagnostic performance of %fPSA in a multi-center biopsy cohort in China and identified the proper age-specific cutoff values to avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Methods

Consecutive patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4.0–10.0 ng/ml or 10.1–20.0 ng/ml who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided or transperineal prostate biopsy were enrolled from 22 Chinese medical centers from Jan 1, 2010 to Dec 31, 2013. The diagnostic accuracy of PSA and %fPSA was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Age-specific cutoff values were calculated using ROC curve analysis.

Results

The median %fPSA was much lower in younger patients compared with older patients with a PSA level of 4.0–10.0 ng/ml or 10.1–20.0 ng/ml. The AUC of %fPSA was higher than PSA only in older patients. In patients aged 50 to 59 years, %fPSA failed to improve the diagnosis compared with PSA in these two PSA ranges. Age-specific cutoff values were 24%, 27% and 32% for patients aged 60–69, 70–79 and ≥80 years, respectively, to reduce unnecessary biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4.0–10.0 ng/ml to detect 90% of all PCa.

Conclusions

The effectiveness of %fPSA is correlated with age in the Chinese population. Age-specific cutoff values would help avoid unnecessary biopsies in the Chinese population.     

High Risk of Under-Grading and -Staging in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance

BackgroundActive surveillance (AS) is increasingly offered to patients with low risk prostate cancer. The present study was conducted to evaluate the risk of tumor under-grading and -staging for AS eligibility. Moreover, we analyzed possible biomarkers for predicting more unfavorable final tumor histology.Methods197 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RPE) but would have met the EAU (European Association of Urology) criteria for AS (PSA<10 ng/ml, biopsy GS ≤6, ≤2 cancer-positive biopsy cores with ≤50% of tumor in any core and clinical stage ≤T2a) were included in the study. These AS inclusion parameters were correlated to the final histology of the RPE specimens. The impact of preoperative PSA level (low PSA ≤4 ng/ml vs. intermediate PSA of >4–10 ng/ml), PSA density (<15 vs. ≥ 15 ng/ml) and the number of positive biopsy cores (1 vs. 2 positive cores) on predicting upgrading and final adverse histology of the RPE specimens was analyzed in uni- and multivariate analyses. Moreover, clinical courses of undergraded patients were assessed.ResultsIn our patient cohort 41.1% were found under-graded in the biopsy (final histology 40.1% GS7, 1% GS8). Preoperative PSA levels, PSA density or the number of positive cores were not predictive for worse final pathological findings including GS >6, extraprostatic extension and positive resection margin (R1) or correlated significantly with up-grading and/or extraprostatic extension in a multivariate model. Only R1 resections were predictable by combining intermediate PSA levels with two positive biopsy cores (p = 0.004). Sub-analyses showed that the number of biopsy cores (10 vs. 15 biopsy cores) had no influence on above mentioned results on predicting biopsy undergrading. Clinical courses of patients showed that 19.9% of patients had a biochemical relapse after RPE, among all of them were undergraded in the initial biopsy.ConclusionIn summary, this study shows that a multitude of patients fulfilling the criteria for AS are under-diagnosed. The use of preoperative PSA levels, PSA density and the number of positive cores were not predictable for undergrading in the present patient collective.     

Using Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer

Transrectal ultrasound-guided systemic biopsy is the recommended method in most cases with suspicion of prostate cancer. Transrectal periprostatic injection with a local anesthetic may be offered as effective analgesia; periprostatic nerve block with 1% or 2% lidocaine is the recommended form of pain control. On initial biopsy, a minimum of 10 systemic, laterally directed cores is recommended, with more cores in larger glands. Extended prostate biopsy schemes, which require cores weighted more laterally at the base (lateral horn) and medially to the apex, show better cancer detection rates without increasing adverse events. Transition zone biopsies are not recommended in the first set of biopsies, owing to low detection rates. One set of repeat biopsies is warranted in cases with persistent indication. Saturation biopsy (≥20 cores) should be reserved for repeat biopsy in patients who have negative results on initial biopsy but who are still strongly suspected to have prostate cancer.Key words: Prostate cancer, Biopsy, Transrectal ultrasound, Prostate-specific antigen, Anesthesia, NomogramsProstate cancer rarely causes symptoms until it is advanced. Thus, suspicion of prostate cancer resulting in a recommendation for prostatic biopsy is most often raised by abnormalities found on digital rectal examination (DRE) or by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevations. Although there is controversy regarding the benefits of early diagnosis, it has been demonstrated that an early diagnosis of prostate cancer is best achieved using a combination of DRE and PSA.Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided, systematic needle biopsy is the most reliable method, at present, to ensure accurate sampling of prostatic tissue in men considered at high risk for harboring prostatic cancer on the basis of DRE and PSA findings. In very rare circumstances, a biopsy of a metastatic site (bone lesion) or a suspicious lymph node may be easier and more advantageous. There are also circumstances in which the usual transrectal route is not feasible (eg, status post-anteroposterior resection of the rectosigmoid; see Tissue Diagnosis in Patients with No Rectal Access section, below). As nearly universal as the approach, as nearly universal is the technique, namely a TRUS-guided biopsy using an 18-gauge needle to obtain a tissue core. To be certain, the same biopsy device and needle may be used to perform a finger-guided biopsy, but this is reserved for unusual circumstances (eg, TRUS imaging not available, finger-guided directed biopsy of suspicious nodule not seen on TRUS). Last, whereas in decades past physicians in many countries performed fine-needle aspiration of the prostate, today this technique is less and less often used, although advocates claim that it is cheaper, faster, easier to perform, and results in lower morbidity than any other technique developed to date. Appropriate training in performing transrectal fine-needle aspiration of the prostate and in interpreting the smears is, of course, essential.¹ Fine-needle aspiration plays a major role in the aforementioned situations in which diagnosis is established from nonprostatic tissue sources, such as lymph nodes and others.^2,3Since the landmark study by Hodge and colleagues⁴ demonstrating the superiority of TRUS guidance compared with digitally guided biopsy, the TRUS-guided biopsy technique has become the worldwide accepted standard in prostate cancer diagnosis. Statistical performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of all other diagnostic tests (eg, DRE and PSA assay) is calculated according to the assignment (cancer present vs absent) made by prostate biopsy. Recognizing the fact that all sampling procedures, including prostate biopsies, incur the risk of returning false-negative results (ie, cancer is present but missed by the biopsies), calculation of the statistical performance characteristics of all other tests using biopsy outcomes as the gold standard are inherently incorrect and biased. Similarly, when comparing the statistical performance of various biopsy strategies, usually the most extensive strategy is chosen as the gold standard to define disease presence or absence, and the performance of all other strategies is calculated on the basis of that particular strategy, again incurring a significant bias due to the remaining falsenegative rate of even the most extensive sampling strategy.     

86例超声引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺体会

目的分析86例经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺病理,提高前列腺癌活检阳性率。方法86例(年龄71-89岁,PSA.>10 ng/ml,PSAD>0.3),直肠超声(TRUS)引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺,6+X法。结果前列腺癌39例,前列腺增生46例,前列腺炎1例。前列腺癌阳性中:有可疑病灶32例,无可疑病灶7例,前列腺癌敏感性82%(32/39),其中第二次穿刺病例8例,阳性4例,第三次穿刺2例,阳性2例。结论对70岁以上高老人的前列腺穿刺活检病人,因个性化对待,重点对可疑病灶点和外周带的穿刺。     

Correlation of modified Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma with age, serum prostate specific antigen and tumor extent in needle biopsy specimens

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation of biopsy grade with age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy tumor extent using the conventional and modified Gleason grading systems. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 828 consecutive needle biopsy specimens of prostate carcinoma were collected from the years 1995 and 2000 (graded with conventional Gleason grading) and 2006 and 2007 (graded with modified Gleason grading). RESULTS: Both conventional and modified Gleason grading correlated with age, serum PSA, percent positive biopsies and percent cancer length. In 2006-2007, the patients were on average younger and more biopsy cores were taken per patient. Serum PSA and percent positive cores were lower than in the 1995 and 2000 group, indicating a stage shift downward, but the Gleason scores were nevertheless higher. CONCLUSION: Conventional and modified Gleason grading both correlated with age, serum PSA and cancer involvement in needle biopsies. With modified Gleason grading there is a grade shift upward despite the downstaging that has been observed in recent years.     

Outcomes and Trends of Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer in Chinese Men from 2003 to 2011

Background

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is growing in popularity in China, but its impact on biopsy characteristics and outcomes are poorly understood.

Objective

Our objective was to characterize prostate biopsy outcomes and trends in Chinese men over a 10-year period, since the increasing use of PSA tests.

Methods

All men (n = 1,650) who underwent prostate biopsy for PCa at Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China from 2003–2011 were evaluated. Demographic and clinical information was collected for each patient, including age, digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (prostate volume and nodule), total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels and free PSA ratio (fPSA/tPSA) prior to biopsy. Prostate biopsy was performed using six cores before October 2007 or ten cores thereafter. Logistic regression and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate our data.

Results

The overall positive rate of prostate biopsy for PCa was 47% and the rate decreased significantly over the years from 74% in 2003 to 33% in 2011 (P-trend = 0.004) . Age at diagnosis was slightly increased (P-trend = 0.04) while fPSA/tPSA was significantly decreased (P-trend = 1.11×10-5). A statistically significant trend was not observed for tPSA levels, prostate volume, or proportion of positive nodule. The model including multiple demographic and clinical variables (i.e., age, DRE, tPSA, fPSA/tPSA and transrectal ultrasound results) (AUC = 0.93) statistically outperformed models that included only PSA (AUC = 0.85) or fPSA/tPSA (AUC = 0.66) to predict PCa risks (P<0.05). Similar results were observed in a subgroup of men whose tPSA levels were lower than 20 ng/mL (AUC = 0.87, vs. AUC of tPSA  = 0.62, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Detection rates of PCa and high-grade PCa among men that underwent prostate biopsy at the institution has decreased significantly in the past 10 years, likely due to increasing use of PSA tests. Predictive performance of demographic and clinical variables of PCa was excellent. These variables should be used in clinics to determine the need for prostate biopsy.     

Transrectal sonography in prostate cancer detection--our 25 years experience of implementation

Prostate cancer is a leading public health problem of male population in developed countries. Gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis is true cut biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasound. Aim of this study was to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value of transrectal sonography (TRUS) in prostate cancer detection. The analysis was made for two time periods, before and after routine implementation of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer diagnostics. From 1984 to 1993 TRUS guided prostate biopsy was performed in 564, and from 1994 to 2008 in 5678 patients. In the second period PSA was routinely used in prostate cancer diagnostics. In the first period by TRUS we have made an exact diagnosis of prostate cancer in 18.97% of patients what was confirmed by biopsy. 4.61% ware false positive and 11.34% ware false negative. In the second period prostate cancer was recognized in 30.34% of patients, confirmed by biopsy. False positive cases ware 6.11% and false negative 29.31%. Sensitivity of transrectal sonography in the first period was 62.57%, specificity 94.2%, accuracy 86.2%, positive predictive value 80.45% and negative predictive value 87.72%. In the second period sensitivity was 50.87%, specificity 91.93%, accuracy 73.84%, positive predictive value 83.24% and negative predictive value 70.39%. Based on our experience we can conclude that prostate cancer is mostly found in the peripheral zone. Smaller tumors are hypoechoic and bigger tumors are hyperechoic. Prostate cancer lesions are impossible to differentiate from chronic prostatitis only by TRUS. Implementation of PSA has significantly decrease sensitivity, accuracy and negative predictive value of TRUS in prostate cancer detection. TRUS guided true cut biopsy is a gold standard in prostate cancer diagnostics.     

The 4Kscore? Test Reduces Prostate Biopsy Rates in Community and Academic Urology Practices

There is significant concern regarding prostate cancer screening because of the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment of men who are discovered to have abnormal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and/or digital rectal examination (DRE) results. The 4Kscore® Test (OPKO Diagnostics, LLC) is a blood test that utilizes four kallikrein levels plus clinical information in an algorithm to calculate an individual’s percentage risk (< 1% to > 95%) for aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7) on prostate biopsy. The 4Kscore Test, as a follow-up test after abnormal PSA and/or DRE test results, has been shown to improve the specificity for predicting the risk of aggressive prostate cancer and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. A clinical utility study was conducted to assess the influence of the 4Kscore Test on the decision to perform prostate biopsies in men referred to urologists for abnormal PSA and/or DRE results. The study population included 611 patients seen by 35 academic and community urologists in the United States. Urologists ordered the 4Kscore Test as part of their assessment of men referred for abnormal PSA and/or DRE test results. Results for the patients were stratified into low risk (< 7.5%), intermediate risk (7.5%–19.9%), and high risk (≥ 20%) for aggressive prostate cancer. The 4Kscore Test results influenced biopsy decisions in 88.7% of the men. Performing the 4Kscore Test resulted in a 64.6% reduction in prostate biopsies in patients; the actual percentage of cases not proceeding to biopsy were 94.0%, 52.9%, and 19.0% for men who had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk 4Kscore Test results, respectively. A higher 4Kscore Test was associated with greater likelihood of having a prostate biopsy (P < 0.001). Among the 171 patients who had a biopsy, the 4Kscore risk category is strongly associated with biopsy pathology. The 4Kscore Test, as a follow-up test for an abnormal PSA and/or DRE results, significantly influenced the physician and patient shared decision in clinical practice, which led to a reduction in prostate biopsies while increasing the probability of detecting aggressive cancer.Key Words: Prostate cancer, Prostate-specific antigen, Digital rectal examination, Biopsy rate, Gleason score, 4Kscore Test, Prostate cancer prognosisWidespread screening for prostate cancer with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) began in 1991, and subsequently a 45% decline in prostate cancer mortality has been observed.¹ A recent large European randomized clinical trial also reported a 29% reduction in death from prostate cancer in men undergoing routine screening.² However, because of a US study that showed no mortality benefits to organized PSA screening,³ and the net physical and psychologic burden of secondary adverse events triggered by PSA testing versus the number of lives saved, the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently advised against routine PSA screening for prostate cancer.⁴ The concern of the USPSTF is based on the fact that most men diagnosed with prostate cancer have a tumor that is unlikely to pose a threat to life expectancy. A recent systematic analysis suggested that up to 60% of prostate cancers diagnosed in contemporary studies might be safely observed without a need for immediate intervention.⁵One of the primary challenges for urologists is the potential for under-grading of Gleason 6 prostate cancer due to biopsy sampling error; as a result, up to 90% of men with a Gleason 6 prostate cancer still proceed to prostate cancer treatment despite the advent of active surveillance programs. Approximately 66% of patients who are diagnosed with Gleason 6 disease at biopsy will be confirmed to have Gleason 6 cancer after radical prostatectomy.⁶ Some of these men are considered to have undergone overtreatment, because Gleason 6 cancer is not considered life threatening.⁷ This subset of men has the potential for developing complications following surgery, including erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and changes in health-related quality of life with disruption of psychologic, sexual, and urinary function.^8–12The prostate biopsy procedure is invasive, and has significant costs and complications such as bleeding, urinary retention, and life-threatening infection. A recent population-based study from Ontario, Canada, revealed a fourfold increase to 4.1% for the rate of hospital admissions after prostate biopsy from 1996 to 2005, with 72% of admissions due to infection.¹³ These risks, combined with the anxiety involved in undergoing the procedure, present a significant burden to any man considering prostate cancer screening.The impact of the USPSTF has been a decrease in overall biopsy rates with a subsequent decline in the detection rate of Gleason 7 to 10 high-grade prostate cancers.¹⁴ The elimination of PSA screening means that the 20% to 30% of men who would have presented with an abnormal PSA level and been found to have high-grade prostate cancer may lose an opportunity for a possible cure.¹⁵ Clearly, there is a need for better risk-stratification tools for men presenting with an abnormal PSA level and/or digital rectal examination (DRE) result in order to both reduce the number of prostate biopsies performed and decrease the rate of Gleason 6 diagnosis and treatment.⁶The 4Kscore® Test (OPKO Diagnostics, LLC) incorporates measured blood levels of four kallikrein proteins: total PSA, free PSA, intact PSA, and human kallikrein 2 plus clinical information (age, DRE findings, and a history of prior negative biopsy result) into a proprietary algorithm to calculate an individual man’s percentage risk (< 1% to > 95%) of having Gleason score ≥ 7 if a prostate biopsy were to be performed. The 4Kscore Test has been extensively validated through a total of 12 prospective and retrospective studies published in peer-reviewed journals involving over 22,000 patients from both the United States and Europe.^16–23 These studies of men with elevated PSA levels involved cohorts of unscreened and screened men, and those with negative prior prostate biopsy results. Based on analyses published in these studies, the 4Kscore Test would have theoretically resulted in a 45% reduction in prostate biopsies while delaying the diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer in only a few men (1.3%–4.7%).The 4Kscore Test is used to accurately determine percentage risk for aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7) and provide additional information for men being considered for prostate biopsy because of abnormal PSA levels and/or DRE results. This allows urologists to better risk stratify men for biopsy and ultimately results in more selective treatment of those men with aggressive disease. Conversely, those men not harboring life-threatening disease are able to safely avoid prostate biopsy and overtreatment of indolent disease.With the introduction of any new diagnostic test such as the 4Kscore Test into clinical practice, it is important to assess whether its implementation, in this case as a follow-up test for an abnormal PSA and/or DRE result, influences and changes the physician-patient shared decision-making process and leads to an actual reduction in prostate biopsies. Herein we evaluated the influence of the 4Kscore Test on urologist-patient decisions about proceeding with biopsy in men who have an abnormal PSA and/or DRE result from multiple academic and community urology clinical practices in the United States.     

Ethnicity Is an Independent Determinant of Age-Specific PSA Level: Findings from a Multiethnic Asian Setting

Objectives

To study the baseline PSA profile and determine the factors influencing the PSA levels within a multiethnic Asian setting.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1054 men with no clinical evidence of prostate cancer, prostate surgery or 5α-reductase inhibitor treatment of known prostate conditions. The serum PSA concentration of each subject was assayed. Potential factors associated with PSA level including age, ethnicity, height, weight, family history of prostate cancer, lower urinary tract voiding symptoms (LUTS), prostate volume and digital rectal examination (DRE) were evaluated using univariable and multivariable analysis.

Results

There were 38 men (3.6%) found to have a PSA level above 4 ng/ml and 1016 (96.4%) with a healthy PSA (≤4 ng/ml). The median PSA level of Malay, Chinese and Indian men was 1.00 ng/ml, 1.16 ng/ml and 0.83 ng/ml, respectively. Indians had a relatively lower median PSA level and prostate volume than Malays and Chinese, who shared a comparable median PSA value across all 10-years age groups. The PSA density was fairly similar amongst all ethnicities. Further analysis showed that ethnicity, weight and prostate volume were independent factors associated with age specific PSA level in the multivariable analysis (p<0.05).

Conclusion

These findings support the concept that the baseline PSA level varies between different ethnicities across all age groups. In addition to age and prostate volume, ethnicity may also need to be taken into account when investigating serum PSA concentrations in the multiethnic Asian population.     

Is Bladder Tumor Location Associated with Prostate Cancer Detection after Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Instillation?

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bladder tumor (BT) location on prostate cancer (PCa) detection in patients with elevated PSA levels after intravesical BCG instillation.

Methods

Between February 2004 and January 2013 prostate biopsies were performed in 59 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients whose PSA level were elevated (≥3 ng/ml) after a 6 week course of intravesical BCG (Oncotice, 12.5 mg in 50 ml normal saline). Differences in PCa detection according to the BT location [bladder neck and/or trigone (Group 1, n = 22) vs. other locations (Group 2, n = 37)] were evaluated. The Fisher''s exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to evaluate the association between categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

Results

A total of 14 patients (23.7%) were diagnosed with PCa. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) PSA before intravesical BCG instillation and prostate biopsy were 1.36±1.04 ng/ml in Group 1 and 1.09±1.12 ng/ml in Group 2 (P = 0.633), and 6.05±3.57 ng/ml in Group 1 and 5.13±3.88 ng/ml in Group 2 (P = 0.378), respectively. Interestingly, whereas PCa was detected upon biopsy in only one patient in Group 1 (4.5%), 13 cases were detected in Group 2 (35.1%) (P = 0.009).

Conclusions

PCa detection after intravesical BCG was highly associated with BT location. Prostate biopsy should therefore be considered when PSA level is elevated after BCG instillation and his BT is located far from the bladder neck.     

Repeat Prostate Biopsy Strategies after Initial Negative Biopsy: Meta-Regression Comparing Cancer Detection of Transperineal,Transrectal Saturation and MRI Guided Biopsy

Introduction

There is no consensus on how to investigate men with negative transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-B) but ongoing suspicion of cancer. Three strategies used are transperineal (TP-B), transrectal saturation (TS-B) and MRI-guided biopsy (MRI-B). We compared cancer yields of these strategies.

Methods

Papers were identified by search of Pubmed, Embase and Ovid Medline. Included studies investigated biopsy diagnostic yield in men with at least one negative TRUS-B and ongoing suspicion of prostate cancer. Data including age, PSA, number of previous biopsy episodes, number of cores at re-biopsy, cancer yield, and Gleason score of detected cancers were extracted. Meta-regression analyses were used to analyse the data.

Results

Forty-six studies were included; 12 of TS-B, 14 of TP-B, and 20 of MRI-B, representing 4,657 patients. Mean patient age, PSA and number of previous biopsy episodes were similar between the strategies. The mean number of biopsy cores obtained by TP-B and TS-B were greater than MRI-B. Cancer detection rates were 30·0%, 36·8%, and 37·6% for TS-B, TP-B, and MRI-B respectively. Meta-regression analysis showed that MRI-B had significantly higher cancer detection than TS-B. There were no significant differences however between MRI-B and TP-B, or TP-B and TS-B. In a sensitivity analysis incorporating number of previous biopsy episodes (36 studies) the difference between MRI-B and TP-B was not maintained resulting in no significant difference in cancer detection between the groups. There were no significant differences in median Gleason scores detected comparing the three strategies.

Conclusions

In the re-biopsy setting, it is unclear which strategy offers the highest cancer detection rate. MRI-B may potentially detect more prostate cancers than other modalities and can achieve this with fewer biopsy cores. However, well–designed prospective studies with standardised outcome measures are needed to accurately compare modalities and define an optimum re-biopsy approach.     

经直肠实时组织超声弹性成像诊断前列腺良恶性病灶的价值

目的:探索经直肠实时组织超声弹性成像技术在前列腺良恶性病灶诊断中的应用价值。方法:选取2013年12月至2014年5月我科疑似前列腺癌(PCa)并拟行穿刺活检的患者49例,以病例活检结果作为金标准,对比经直肠实时组织超声弹性成像技术、经直肠超声(TRUS)及直肠指诊(DRE)在疑似PCa患者中的诊出结果,并对直肠超声进行弹性图像评分及应变指数分析。结果:弹性图像评分≥4分时,其对PCa的敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为92.3%、91.3%和93.9%;良性病灶的应变指数为2.84±4.72,恶性病灶的应变指数为32.12±15.05,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:经直肠实时组织超声弹性成像技术可提高PCa的诊出率,在前列腺良恶性病灶的鉴别及指导治疗与预后方面有重要价值。