A new set of Mu DNA transposition intermediates: alternate pathways of target capture preceding strand transfer.

Mu DNA transposition occurs within the context of higher order nucleoprotein structures or transpososomes. We describe a new set of transpososomes in which Mu B-bound target DNA interacts non-covalently with previously characterized intermediates prior to the actual strand transfer. This interaction can occur at several points along the reaction pathway: with the LER, the Type 0 or the Type 1 complexes. The formation of these target capture complexes, which rapidly undergo the strand transfer chemistry, is the rate-limiting step in the overall reaction. These complexes provide alternate pathways to strand transfer, thereby maximizing transposition potential. This versatility is in contrast to other characterized transposons, which normally capture target DNA only at a single point in their respective reaction pathways.     

Mechanism of Mu DNA transposition

The study of Mu DNA transposition in vitro has resulted in a much better understanding of the biochemical details of the transposition process. An early step in transposition is the generation of a 5th structure which is the product of the strand-tansfer reaction. The polarity of the strand transfer has been determined and substantial progress has been made on the role of the individual proteins. Moreover, the strand-transfer reaction is mediated by stable protein–DNA complexes, or transposomes, and the reaction can be divided into two sequential steps. The role of the transposomes and the requirement for a supercoiled Mu DNA substrate are also discussed.     

DNA intermediates in transposition of phage Mu

Transposable genetic elements can insert into DNA sites that have no homology to themselves. Evidence that there is a physical linkage between a transposable element and its target DNA sequence during transposition comes from studies on bacteriophage Mu DNA transposition in which plasmids containing Mu DNA have been shown to attach to host DNA. We report the isolation of key structures, seen after induction of Mu DNA replication, after cloning lac operator into Mu DNA and using the lac repressor-operator interaction to trap Mu DNA on nitrocellulose filters. We have localized Mu sequences within these structures in the electron microscope by visualizing the lac operator-repressor interaction after binding with ferritin-conjugated antibody. This analysis shows that key structures contain replicating Mu DNA linked to non-Mu DNA and that replication can begin at either end of Mu.     

Dissection of the bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS): significance of the SGS right arm in Mu biology and DNA gyrase mechanism

The bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS), required for efficient phage DNA replication, differs from other gyrase sites in the efficiency of gyrase binding coupled with a highly processive supercoiling activity. Genetic studies have implicated the right arm of the SGS as a key structural feature for promoting rapid Mu replication. Here, we show that deletion of the distal portion of the right arm abolishes efficient binding, cleavage, and supercoiling by DNA gyrase in vitro. DNase I footprinting analysis of the intact SGS revealed an adenylyl imidodiphosphate-dependent change in protection in the right arm, indicating that this arm likely forms the T segment that is passed through the cleaved G segment during the supercoiling reaction. Furthermore, in an SGS derivative with an altered right-arm sequence, the left arm showed these changes, suggesting that the selection of a T segment by gyrase is determined primarily by the sequences of the arms. Analysis of the sequences of the SGS and other gyrase sites suggests that the choice of T segment correlates with which arm possesses the more extensive set of phased anisotropic bending signals, with the Mu right arm possessing an unusually extended set of such signals. The implications of these observations for the structure of the gyrase-DNA complex and for the biological function of the Mu SGS are discussed.     

DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition.

Initial events in Mu DNA transposition involve specific recognition of Mu DNA ends (att sites) and an internal enhancer site by the Mu transposase (A protein). This interaction between A protein and Mu DNA sequences present on a supercoiled DNA substrate leads to the formation of a stable synaptic complex in which the att ends are nicked, prior to DNA strand transfer. This study examines the properties of a synaptic complex proficient for DNA transposition. We show that the A protein binds as a monomer to its binding sites, and causes the DNA to bend through approximately 90 degrees at each site. All six att binding sites (three at each Mu end) are occupied by A within the synaptic complex. Three of these sites are loosely held and can be emptied of A upon challenge with heparin. A synaptic complex with only three sites occupied is stable and is fully competent in the subsequent strand-transfer step of transposition.     

DNA gyrase is a host factor required for transposition of Tn5

We show that DNA gyrase is required for transposition of Tn5. Coumermycin, a potent inhibitor of DNA gyrase subunit B, inhibits transposition in a wild-type strain, but has no effect on strains carry ing a coumermycin-resistant allele in gyrB. In addition, strains containing a thermolabile subunit A of gyrase (gyrA43) are defective for transposition at a nonpermissive temperature. The requirement for gyrase is due to a requirement for supercoiled DNA. We showed this by introducing into the gyrA43 strain a deletion of the gene encoding topoisomerase I. The introduction of the second mutation caused an increase in the superhelical density of DNA as well as an increase in the transposition frequency. This also implies that if the DNA is supercoiled there is no further requirement for gyrase. Experiments with coumermycin support this, because the drug does not inhibit transposition if the recipient DNA remains supercoiled. This indicates that if the DNA acting as recipient of the transposon is deficient in supercoils, it will be a poor substrate for transposition. We also describe a system in which a gene on a multicopy plasmid can be efficiently introduced into the Escherichia coli chromosome.     

Regulation of bacteriophage Mu transposition

Bacteriophage Mu is a transposon and a temperate phage which has become a paradigm for the study of the molecular mechanism of transposition. As a prophage, Mu has also been used to study some aspects of the influence of the host cell growth phase on the regulation of transposition. Through the years several host proteins have been identified which play a key role in the replication of the Mu genome by successive rounds of replicative transposition as well as in the maintenance of the repressed prophage state. In this review we have attempted to summarize all these findings with the purpose of emphasizing the benefit the virus and the host cell can gain from those phage-host interactions.     

Differential role of the Mu B protein in phage Mu integration vs. replication: mechanistic insights into two transposition pathways

The Mu B protein is an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and an allosteric activator of the Mu transposase. As a result of these activities, Mu B is instrumental in efficient transposition and target-site choice. We analysed in vivo the role of Mu B in the two different recombination reactions performed by phage Mu: non-replicative transposition, the pathway used during integration, and replicative transposition, the pathway used during lytic growth. Utilizing a sensitive PCR-based assay for Mu transposition, we found that Mu B is not required for integration, but enhances the rate and extent of the process. Furthermore, three different mutant versions of Mu B, Mu BC99Y, Mu BK106A, and Mu B1-294, stimulate integration to a similar level as the wild-type protein. In contrast, these mutant proteins fail to support Mu growth. This deficiency is attributable to a defect in formation of an essential intermediate for replicative transposition. Biochemical analysis of the Mu B mutant proteins reveals common features: the mutants retain the ability to stimulate transposase, but are defective in DNA binding and target DNA delivery. These data indicate that activation of transposase by Mu B is sufficient for robust non-replicative transposition. Efficient replicative transposition, however, demands that the Mu B protein not only activate transposase, but also bind and deliver the target DNA.     

Electron microscopic analysis of in vitro transposition intermediates of bacteriophage Mu DNA

Bacteriophage Mu is a highly efficient transposon and the only moveable element for which an in vitro transposition system has been reported. Recently, this system has been used by Craigie and Mizuuchi [Cell 41 (1985) 867-876] to identify and biochemically characterize intermediates in the transposition process. We have utilized the in vitro transposition system to generate intermediates in the transposition process and have analyzed these intermediates by electron-microscopic methods. Partial denaturation mapping has shown the intermediates to be theta-shaped structures in which the phi X174 target DNA is joined to the mini-Mu plasmid at the ends of the Mu genome. Our results are in agreement with the previous biochemical studies and the type of intermediate we observe is exactly what is predicted by the Shapiro model of transposition [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979) 1933-1937].     

Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation

Phage Mu transposition is initiated by the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction, which generates a branched DNA structure that acts as a transposition intermediate. A critical step in this reaction is formation of a special synaptic DNA-protein complex called a plectosome. We find that formation of this complex involves, in addition to a pair of Mu end sequences, a third cis-acting sequence element, the internal activation sequence (IAS). The IAS is specifically recognized by the N-terminal domain of Mu transposase (MuA protein). Neither the N-terminal domain of MuA protein nor the IAS is required for later reaction steps. The IAS overlaps with the sequences to which Mu repressor protein binds in the Mu operator region; the Mu repressor directly inhibits the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction by interfering with the interaction between MuA protein and the IAS, providing an additional mode of regulation by the repressor.     

A biochemical analysis of the interaction of DNA gyrase with the bacteriophage Mu, pSC101 and pBR322 strong gyrase sites: the role of DNA sequence in modulating gyrase supercoiling and biological activity

Replication of bacteriophage Mu DNA, a process requiring efficient synapsis of the prophage ends, takes place within the confines of the Escherichia coli nucleoid. Critical to ensuring rapid synapsis is the function of the SGS, a strong gyrase site, located at the centre of the Mu genome. Replacement of the SGS by the strong gyrase sites from pSC101 or pBR322 fails to support efficient prophage replication. To probe the unique SGS properties we undertook a biochemical analysis of the interaction of DNA gyrase with the Mu SGS, pSC101 and pBR322 sites. In binding and cleavage assays the order of efficacy was pSC101 > Mu SGS > pBR322. However, in supercoiling assays the Mu SGS (cloned into pUC19) exhibited a strong enhancement of gyrase-catalysed supercoiling over pUC19 alone; the pSC101 site showed none and the pBR322 site gave a moderate improvement. Most striking was the Mu SGS-dependent increase in processivity of the gyrase reaction. This highly processive supercoiling coupled with efficient binding may account for the unique biological properties of the SGS. The results emphasize the importance of the DNA substrate as an active component in modulating the gyrase supercoiling reaction, and in determining the biological roles of specialized gyrase sites.     

Predominant end-products of prophage Mu DNA transposition during the lytic cycle are replicon fusions

The structure of l-arabinose-binding protein (M_r 33, 100), an essential component of the osmotic shock-sensitive, high-affinity l-arabinose transport system in Escherichia coli, has been determined at 2.4 Å resolution. The phases were solved by the method of multiple isomorphous replacement, using four derivatives, p-chloromercuribenzenesulfonate and CdI₂ (data to 2.4 Å resolution), and p-chloromercurinitrophenol and (NH₄)₂PtCl₄ to 3.5 Å resolution. A final mean figure of merit of 0.65 was obtained for 9628 reflections.With the aid of the amino acid sequence determined by Hogg &; Hermodson (1977), a complete model of the protein molecule has been determined using initially an optical comparator. The entire model was subsequently examined in detail using a computer graphic system.The protein molecule is ellipsoidal (axial ratio of 2:1), and consists of two globular domains (designated P and Q). Each domain is made from two separate polypeptide chain segments. Despite the discontinuity in the folding, the arrangements of the secondary structure in the two domains are very similar. Both domains contain a six-stranded parallel β-sheet (with the exception of the sixth anti-parallel strand in the Q domain) flanked by two α-helices on either side. The packing topology is α/β. A C-terminal helix is shared by both domains.The two domains show significant conformational similarity but lack sequence homology. A comparison of the two domains revealed that of the 139 α-carbons in the P domain and 152 in the Q domain, 92 were found to be equivalent with a root-mean-square distance of 2.6 Å.The cleft formed by the packing of the two domains is predominantly lined with hydrophilic residues. The sugar-binding site is located in this cleft.     

Inhibition of bacteriophage Mu transposition by Mu repressor and Fis

In this paper we show that the Escherichia coli protein Fis has a regulatory function in Mu transposition in the presence of Mu repressor. Fis can lower the transposition frequency of a mini-Mu 3–80-fold, but only if the Mu repressor is expressed simultaneously. In this novel type of regulation of transposition by the concerted action of Fis and repressor, the IAS, the internal activating sequence, is also involved as deletion of this site leads to the loss of the Fis effect. As the IAS contains strong repressor binding sites these are probably the target for the repressor in the observed negative regulation by Fis and repressor. However, the role of Fis and repressor is not only to inactivate the IAS, since a 4bp insertion in the IAS, which changes the spacing of the repressor-binding site, abolishes the enhancing function of the IAS but leaves the repressor-Fis effect intact. A likely target for Fis in this regulation is a strong Fis-binding site, which is located adjacent to the L2 transposase-binding site. However, when this Fis-binding sequence was substituted by a random sequence and Fis no longer showed specific binding to this site, the Fis effect was still observed. Although it is still possible that Fis can function by binding to this non-specific site in a particular complex, it seems more likely that Fis is directly or indirectly involved in determining the level of the repressor.     

Role of DNA topology in Mu transposition: mechanism of sensing the relative orientation of two DNA segments

DNA strand transfer at the initiation of Mu transposition normally requires a negatively supercoiled transposon donor molecule, containing both ends of Mu in inverted repeat orientation. We propose that the specific relative orientation of the Mu ends is needed only to energetically favor a particular configuration that the ends must adopt in a synaptic complex. The model was tested by constructing special donor DNA substrates that, because of their catenation or knotting, energetically favor this same configuration of the Mu ends, even though they are on separate molecules or in direct repeat orientation. These structures are efficient substrates for the strand transfer reaction, whereas appropriate control structures are not. The result eliminates tracking or protein scaffold models for orientation preference. Several other systems in which the relative orientation of two DNA segments is sensed may utilize the same mechanism.     

A truncated form of the bacteriophage Mu B protein promotes conservative integration, but not replicative transposition, of Mu DNA

The phage-encoded proteins required for conservative integration of infecting bacteriophage Mu DNA were investigated. Our findings show that functional gpA, an essential component of the phage transposition system, is required for integration. The Mu B protein, which greatly enhances replicative transposition of Mu DNA, is also required. Furthermore, a truncated form of gpB lacking 18 amino acids from the carboxy terminus is blocked in replicative transposition, but not conservative integration. Our results point to a more prominent role for gpB than simply a replication enhancer in Mu DNA transposition. The ability of a truncated form of B to function in conservative integration, but not replicative transposition, also suggests a key role for the carboxy-terminal domain of the protein in the replicative reaction. The existence of a shortened form of gpB, which uncouples conservative integration from replicative transposition, should be invaluable for future dissection of Mu DNA transposition.     

Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA

We report that two types of stable protein-DNA complexes, or transpososomes, are generated in vitro during the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction. The Type 1 complex is an intermediate in the reaction. Its formation requires a supercoiled mini-Mu donor plasmid, Mu A and HU protein, and Mg2+. In the Type 1 complex the two ends of Mu are held together, creating a figure eight-shaped molecule with two independent topological domains; the Mu sequences remain supercoiled while the vector DNA is relaxed because of nicking. In the presence of Mu B protein, ATP, target DNA, and Mg2+, the Type 1 complex is converted into the protein-associated product of the strand transfer reaction. In this Type 2 complex, the target DNA has been joined to the Mu DNA ends held in the synaptic complex at the center of the figure eight. Supercoils are not required for the latter reaction.     

Host DNA replication forks are not preferred targets for bacteriophage Mu transposition.

Bacteriophage Mu DNA integration in Escherichia coli strains infected after alignment of chromosomal replication was analyzed by a sandwich hybridization assay. The results indicated that Mu integrated into chromosomal segments at various distances from oriC with similar kinetics. In an extension of these studies, various Hfr strains were infected after alignment of chromosomal replication, and Mu transposition was shut down early after infection. The positions of integrated Mu copies were inferred from the transfer kinetics of Mu to an F- strain. Our analysis indicated that the location of Mu DNA in the host chromosome was not dependent on the positions of host replication forks at the time of infection. However, the procedure for aligning chromosomal replication affected DNA transfer by various Hfr strains differently, and this effect could account for prior results suggesting preferential integration of Mu at host replication forks.     

Criss-crossed interactions between the enhancer and the att sites of phage Mu during DNA transposition.

A bipartite enhancer sequence (composed of the O1 and O2 operator sites) is essential for assembly of the functional tetramer of phage Mu transposase (MuA) on supercoiled DNA substrates. A three-site interaction (LER) between the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu (att sites) and the enhancer (E) precedes tetramer assembly. We have dissected the role of the enhancer in tetramer assembly by using two transposase proteins that have a common att site specificity, but are distinct in their enhancer specificity. The activity of these proteins on substrates containing hybrid enhancers reveals a 'criss-crossed' pattern of interaction between att and enhancer sites. The left operator, O1, of the enhancer interacts specifically with the transposase subunit at the R1 site (within the right att sequence) that is responsible for cleaving the left end of Mu. The right operator, O2, shows a preferential interaction with the transposase subunit at the L1 site (within the left att sequence) that is responsible for cleaving the right end of Mu.     

SNP discovery by mismatch-targeting of Mu transposition

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) represent a valuable resource for the mapping of human disease genes and induced mutations in model organisms. SNPs may become the markers of choice also for population ecology and evolutionary studies, but their isolation for non-model organisms with unsequenced genomes is often difficult. Here, we describe a rapid and cost-effective strategy to isolate SNPs that exploits the property of the bacteriophage Mu transposition machinery to target mismatched DNA sites and thereby to effectively detect polymorphic loci. To demonstrate the methodology, we isolated 164 SNPs from the unsequenced genome of the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia), a much-studied species in population biology, and we validated 24 of them. The strategy involves standard molecular biology techniques as well as undemanding MuA transposase-catalyzed in vitro transposition reactions, and it is applicable to any organism.