Phase Shifting Effects in the Photoperiodic Rhythm of Flowering in Dark-Grown Seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy

Dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy received an initialsaturating fluence of red (R) light (R₁), followed at intervalsby further R pulses (R₂ and R₃). R₂ was given at different timesafter R₁. R₂ was used to scan the subsequent 72 h period. The initial exposure to R (R₁) initiated a circadian rhythmin the flowering response to the scanning R exposure (R₂). Thephase of the rhythm was shifted by the second exposure to R(R₂) and the sensitivity of the phase-shifting response variedwith the time of giving the R₂ pulse. The direct response toR₂ (i.e., the magnitude of flowering produced in the absenceof a scanning R₂ exposure) also varied in sensitivity. WhenR² was given 4h after R₁, the phase-shift was achieved by anexposure of 20 s (sufficient to establish 20–25% Pfr/P)but more than 80 s was required to saturate the direct floweringresponse at this time. When given 16 h after R₁, 80 s of R₂(sufficient to establish 55% Pfr/P) was required for the phase-shift,whereas the maximum promotion of flowering was produced by only5 s R. These differences in fluence-response relationships indicatethat the direct flowering response to a dark interruption withR and the effect of such an interruption to phase-shift theunderlying rhythm are distinct processes. (Received April 30, 1986; Accepted November 11, 1986)     

Evidence that photoperiodic, dark time measurement in Pharbitis nil involves a circadian rather than a semidian rhythm

Experiments were carried out to determine whether a semidian (12 h) rhythm in flowering response operates in Pharbitis nil as the basis for photoperiodic time measurement. The effect of 5 min far-red light followed by 85 min dark (FRD) given 4, 8,14 and 22 h before the end of a 48 h photoperiod on night-break timing and critical night length was determined. When given 4 h before the end of a 48 h photoperiod, an interruption with FRD advanced the phase of the circadian rhythm in the night-break inhibition of flowering. In contrast, earlier interruptions of the photoperiod had no effect on the phase of the rhythm. The critical night length was modified by FRD given 4 h (shortened) or 8 h (lengthened) before the end of the photo-period; when given at other times FRD did not alter the critical night length. The results are discussed in relation to the basis for photoperiodic timekeeping, with particular reference to suggestions for the involvement of a semidian rhythm. A circadian model based on the concept of limit cycles is described.     

Shifts in the semidian rhythm of flowering do determine night-break timing and critical night length in Pharbitis nil

There is a semidian (≈12 h) rhythm in the flowering response of the short-day plant Pharbitis nil Choisy following 90 min exposure to either far-red light/darkness or a temperature drop (27 °C to 12 °C) given at various times in constant conditions before an inductive dark period. This semidian rhythmic response to the temperature-drop pretreatments in the light is also evident through the inductive dark period without change of phase. Furthermore, those pretreatments which increase flowering also advance the time of maximum sensitivity to red light (R) interruptions of the dark period by up to 1.5 h and shorten the critical night length. Conversely, pretreatments which reduce flowering delay the time of maximum R inhibition by up to 1.5 h and increase the critical night length by the same amount. However the phase of a circadian rhythm of flowering response had no effect on either the time of maximum R inhibition or the critical night length. Thus, the semidian rhythm determines both the time of maximum R inhibition and the critical night length in Pharbitis. Received: 8 November 1997 / Accepted: 7 January 1998     

Parametric and nonparametric entrainment of circadian locomotor rhythm in the Japanese honeybee Apis cerana japonica

The circadian rhythm of locomotor activity in the Japanese honeybee Apis cerana japonica was studied to determine the involvement of parametric and/or nonparametric entrainment. The rhythm was entrained to a skeleton photoperiod in which a 1-h first light pulse was imposed in the morning along with a second light pulse in the evening, as well as to a complete photoperiodic regime (LD 12:12). However, the timing of peak activity relative to the lights-off in the evening in the skeleton photoperiod was earlier than that in the complete photoperiod. A single daily light pulse in the evening entrained the rhythm, whereas a daily light pulse in the morning allowed free-running as in constant darkness. The free-running period (τ) of locomotor activity in constant light became longer as the light intensity increased. A Winfree's type I phase response curve of the locomotor activity rhythm was obtained using a single 1-h light pulse. The results suggest that both parametric and nonparametric entrainment are involved in the circadian rhythm of individual locomotor activity in this honeybee.     

Studies of the Involvement of an Endogenous Rhythm in the Photoperiodic Response of Hyoscyamus niger

An attempt was made to determine the involvement of an endogenous circadian rhythm in the flowering response of the long-day plant Hyoscyamus niger L. grown in a modified White's medium. Both variable-cycle-length and light interruption experiments were employed in this attempt. In the variable-cycle experiments, plants were subjected to light periods of 6, 12, or 18 hours followed by varying lengths of darkness. The total lengths of the cycles varied from 12 to 72 hours. In experiments utilizing a 6-hour photoperiod, a high level of flowering occurred in cycle lengths of 12, 36, and 60 hours. Flowering was suppressed in the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour cycles. When a 12-hour photoperiod was used the flowering response was low between 24 and 36 hours and flowering did not indicate a rhythmic response. When an 18-hour photoperiod was used, the flowering response was suppressed in the 36- and 60-hour cycles.

Light-break experiments were conducted to study further the flowering response in Hyoscyamus. These experiments consisted of a 6-hour main photoperiod followed by varying lengths of darkness to make cycles of 24, 48, and 72 hours. At given intervals the dark period was interrupted by 2-hour light breaks. In a 24-hour cycle, flowering was promoted when a light break was given at either the twelfth or eighteenth hour of the cycle. In a 48-hour cycle, flowering was strongly promoted by light breaks given near the beginning or at the end of the dark period. In a 72-hour cycle, light breaks given at the eighteenth, forty-second, and sixty-sixth hour of the cycle stimulated flowering as compared with light breaks given at the thirtieth and fifty-fourth hour. These results are indicative of the involvement of an endogenous rhythm in the flowering response of Hyoscyamus niger.

     

A Semidian Rhythm in the Flowering Response of Pharbitis nil to Far-Red Light: II. The Involvement of Phytochrome

The semidian (~12 h) periodicity in the effect of far-red (FR) interruptions of the light period preceding inductive darkness on flowering in Pharbitis nil appears to be mediated by phytochrome: (a) promotion by interruptions 2 hours before inductive darkness (−2 hours) and inhibition at −8 hours are greater the higher the proportion of FR/R+FR during the interruption; (b) brief FR exposures followed by darkness are even more effective than FR throughout; (c) the effect of brief FR is reversed by subsequent R; (d) R interruptions of an FR background are most promotive at −8 hours, when FR is most inhibitory. Promotive FR interruptions at −2 or −14 hours shorten the critical dark period whereas inhibitory FR interruptions at −8 hours lengthen it. We conclude that the semidian rhythm is controlled by a `timing pool' of phytochrome FR absorbing form (Pfr) which disappears rapidly in darkness: four different estimates from our experiments indicate that Pfr was reduced to the level set by FR within 20 to 45 minutes in darkness. However, flowering may also be influenced by a `metabolic pool' of Pfr with a delayed loss in darkness, the time of which can be advanced or retarded by shifting the semidian rhythm.     

Rhythmicity of Flowering in Pharbitis nil

When young seedlings of Pharbitis nil are grown under continuous light, except for a single inductive dark period, they flower to a varying degree, depending on when this dark period is given. Plants become sensitive to this induction approximately three days after the seedlings emerge from the soil. The expression of flowering varies in a rhythmic fashion for three or more cycles, when an inductive dark period is given at progressively later times. The time between maximum expression of flowering is 24 hours or somewhat longer. It appears necessary that the inductive dark period be of sufficient duration, to only partially induce the plants to flower for this rhythm to be expressed. Under the conditions employed in this study, this duration is 12 hours. If this rhythm is endogenous, it exists at least from when the plants emerged from the soil since no environmental cues are given after that time, and it raises questions of the interpretations of data from previous studies with this organism.     

Phaseshifting of the photoperiodic flowering response rhythm in Pharbitis nil by red-light pulses

The control by light of the flowering response rhythm in the short-day plant Pharbitis nil Choisy cv. Violet was examined by giving a single pulse of light at various times between 1 and 6 h after a 24-h light period. When the first circadian cycle of the rhythm was monitored, it was found that a pulse of red light given at 1, 2 or 3 h into a 72-dark period caused a 1-h delay of the phase of the response rhythm, while a pulse at 6 h caused a 2-h delay. These results support the hypothesis that, when red-light pulses are given at hourly intervals, they are as effective as continuous light in preventing the onset of dark timing because they repeatedly return the rhythm to the circadian time at which it is apparently suspended in continuous light. The perception of and response to continuous light and red-light pulses are also briefly discussed.     

The semidian rhythm in flowering response of Pharbitis nil in relation to dark period time measurement and to a circadian rhythm

When seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy, cv. Violet, are exposed to a single inductive dark period at 27°C, brief interruptions with red light (R) can be promotive after 2–3 h of darkness but increasingly inhibitory to flowering up to the 8–9th h of darkness. This rhythmic response to R interruptions can be advanced in phase by > 1 h when the preceding light period is interrupted with far-red (FR) 2 h before darkness (FR -2 h) or with FR – 15 h, whereas FR –8 h or FR–22 h retard the rhythm. These shifts in the R interruption rhythm are paralleled by equal shifts in the length of the dark period required for flowering. Brief FR interruptions of darkness displayed a similar rhythm which was also advanced by FR –2 h and retarded by FR –8 h. We conclude therefore that the semidian rhythm in the light, which we have previously described, continues through at least the first 12 h of darkness, is manifested in the R interruption rhythm, and determines the critical night length. A circadian rhythm with a marked effect on flowering was also identified, but several lines of evidence suggest that the circadian and semidian rhythms have independent additive effects on flowering and do not appear to show phase interaction.     

A Semidian Rhythm in the Flowering Response of Pharbitis nil to Far-Red Light: I. Phasing in Relation to the Light-Off Signal

Evidence is presented of an endogenous rhythm in flowering response to far-red (FR) irradiation, with a period of about 12 h (hence semidian rhythm), which persists through at least three cycles in constant conditions of continuous light at 27°C and has a marked influence on the flowering response in Pharbitis nil to a subsequent inductive dark period. The phase of the rhythm is not influenced by real time nor by the time from imbibition or from the beginning of the light period. Rather, it is fed forward from the beginning of the FR interruption to the beginning of the inductive dark period. The period of the rhythm is not affected by irradiance but is longer at cooler temperature. When there are two FR interruptions during the preceding light period, it is primarily the later one which determines the phase of the rhythm, although some interactions are evident. There appears to be an abrupt rephasing of the rhythm at the beginning of the inductive dark period. No overt rhythms which could be used as “clock hands” for the semidian rhythm were detected in photosynthesis, stomatal opening, or translocation.     

Photoperiodism and rhythmic response to light

Abstract. Seedlings of Pharhitis nil show a circadian rhythm in the capacity to flower in response to the timing of a second red light pulse given at various times after a first saturating exposure to red when this is given together with a benzyladeninc spray. There are also changes in the photon irradiance required for half maximum response to the second red pulse. The photochemical properties of phytochrome in the photoperiodically sensitive cotyledons were also shown to change rhythmically. Oscillations in both p_r→ P_fr and P_fr→ P_r photoconversion characteristics persisted over at least two circadian cycles with a periodicity of about 12 h. There were, however, no significant oscillations in either P_fr peak absorbance or in Δ(ΔA). The changes in sensitivity for the photoconversion of P_r→ P_fr did not parallel the much larger changes in sensitivity of the flowering response to red light. The amplitude of the P_r→ P_fr rhythm was at least as great as that for P_r→ P_fr, but the flowering response to far-red light was not rhythmic, nor was there any large change in sensitivity. The changes in photoconversion properties may reflect a basic biochemical oscillation which affects both photoreceptor properties and sensitivity to photoreceptor input. There was also a marked rhythm in the P_fr/P ratio that would be established by a saturating pulse of red light and this too may have affected the flowering response to such a pulse. Far-red light inhibited flowering when given at any time during the inductive night. After 14 h in darkness, P_fr could still be measured in the cotyledons and it was concluded that far-red light inhibited flowering by removing P_fr As red light also inhibited flowering at this time, there may be two pools of phytochrome with different kinetic properties.     

The role of phytochrome in photoperiodic time measurement and its relation to rhythmic timekeeping in the control of flowering in Chenopodium rubrum

Summary To follow changes in the status of phytochrome in green tissue and to relate these changes to the photoperiodic control of flowering, we have used a null response technique involving 1.5-min irradiations with mixtures of different ratios of R and FR radiation.Following a main photoperiod of light from fluorescent lamps that was terminated with 5 min of R light, the proportion of P_fr in Chenopodium rubrum cotyledons was high and did not change until the 3rd hour in darkness; at this time, P_fr disappeared rapidly. When the dark period began with a 5-min irradiation with BCJ or FR light to set the proportion of P_fr low P_fr gradually reappeared during the first 3 h of darkness and then disappeared again.The timing of disappearance of P_fr is consistent with the involvement of phytochrome in photoperiodic time measurement. Reappearance of P_fr after an initial FR irradiation explains why FR irradiations sometimes fail to influence photoperiodic time measurement or only slightly hasten time measurement. A R light interruption to convert P_r to P_fr delayed, the timer by 3 h but only for interruptions after and not before the time of P_fr disappearance. Such 5-min R-light interruptions did not influence the operation of the rhythmic timekeeping mechanism. Continuous or intermittent-5 min every 1.5 h-irradiations of up to 6 h in duration were required to rephase the rhythm controlling flowering. A skeleton photoperiod of 6 h that was began and terminated by 5 or 15 min of light failed to rephase the rhythm.The shape of the curves for the rhythmic response of C. rubrum to the length of the dark period are sometimes suggestive of clocks operating on the principle of a tension-relaxation mechanism. Such a model allows for separate timing action of a rhythm and of P_fr disappearance over the early hours of darkness. Separate timing action does not, however, preclude an interaction between the rhythm and phytochrome in controlling flowering.Abbreviations FR far-red - P_fr far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome - P_r red-absorbing form of phytochrome - R red - BCJ photographic ruby-red irradiation A grant in aid of research from the National Research Council of Canada to B. G. Cumming is gratefully acknowledged.     

Light requirement,phytochrome and photoperiodic induction of flowering of Pharbitis nil Chois

For dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil capacity to flower in response to a single inductive dark period was established by 24 h white, far-red (FR) or ruby-red (BCJ) light and by a skeleton photoperiod of 10 min red (R)-24 h dark-10 min R. FR alone was ineffective without a brief terminal (R) irradiation, confirming that the form of phytochrome immediately prior to darkness is a crucial factor for flowering in Pharbitis. The magnitude of the flowering response was significantly greater after 24 h FR or white light (WL) (at 18° C and 27° C) than after two brief skeleton R irradiations, but the increased flowering response was not attributable to photosynthetic CO₂ uptake because this could not be detected in seedlings exposed to 24 h WL at 18° C. Photophosphorylation could have contributed to the increased flowering response as photosystem I fluorescence was detectable in plants exposed to FR, BCJ, or WL, but there were large differences between flowering response and photosystem I capacity as indicated by fluorescence. We conclude that phytochrome plays a major role in photoresponses regulating flowering. There was no simple correlation between developmental changes, such as cotyledon expansion and chlorophyll formation during the 24-h irradiation period, and the capacity to flower in response to a following inductive dark period. Changes in plastid ultrastructure were considerable in light from fluorescent lamps and there was complete breakdown of the prolamellar body with or without lamellar stacking at 27 or 18° C, respectively, but plastid reorganization was minimal in FR-irradiated seedlings.Abbreviations BCJ irradiation from photographic ruby-red lamps - FR far-red light - P_fr far-red-absorbing from of phytochrome - P total phytochrome content - R red light - WL white light from fluorescent lamps     

Ethylene and IAA interactions in the inhibition of photoperiodic flower induction of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pharbitis nil</Emphasis>

It has been shown that both IAA and ethylene application inhibit flower induction in the short-day plant Pharbitis nil. However application of IAA has elevated ethylene production in this plant, as well. Strong enhancement of ethylene production is also correlated with the night-break effect, which completely inhibits flowering. In order to determine what the role of IAA and ethylene is in the photoperiodic flower induction in Pharbitis nil, we measured changes in their levels during inductive and non-inductive photoperiods, and the effects of ethylene biosynthesis and action inhibitors on inhibition of flowering by IAA. Our results have shown that the inhibitory effect of IAA on Pharbitis nil flowering is not physiological but is connected with its effect on ethylene biosynthesis.     

Studies on the light controlling the time of flower-opening in Pharbitis nil

Flower buds of Pharbitis nil, strain Violet, open about 10 hrafter the onset of darkness at 24?C. Daylight fluorescent lightat 0.3–3 W/m² given during the first 4 hr of this darkperiod delayed the time of flower-opening, but that given laterhad only a slight effect or was ineffective. Red light was mosteffective in delaying the time of flower-opening, and a 5-minred light pulse given every 30 min also was effective. The effectof this 5-min red light was partly reversed by a subsequentfar-red light pulse which suggests that the absence of P_fr duringthe first 4 hr in the dark is necessary for normal timing offlower-opening. Five minutes of red light given 10 hr after the onset of darknessadvanced the phase of the circadian rhythm which controls thetime of flower-opening; buds opened about 7 hr earlier on thefollowing day. This effect of red light was also reversed bya subsequent exposure to far-red light, which suggests the participationof phytochrome in this reaction. (Received October 8, 1979; )     

Night length measurements by the circadian clock controlling diapause induction in the mosquito Aedes atropalpus

Night interruption experiments were used to investigate the behavior of the clock controlling diapause induction in the mosquito, Aedes atropalpus. The data from these experiments indicated that the clock included a circadian oscillator which was phase set at dusk. Following this event the oscillator proceeded to drive a nightly rhythm of sensitivity to light. This rhythm included a photoinducible phase where light interruption inhibited diapause. The photoinducible phase was fixed, occurring 7 to 9 hr after dusk in all photoperiod regimens tested. The photoinducible phase was followed by a refractory phase, which continued until dawn. During the refractory period light did not inhibit diapause. These observations indicated that the circadian clock behaved like an interval timer which was set at dusk. The rhythm of sensitivity to light, an inherited time scale, limited the induction of diapause to seasonal periods when nights were longer than 9 hr. As a result, diapause was induced only when the daylength dropped below the critical photoperiod of L15:D9 (hours of light:hours of dark).A ‘T’ experimental design was used to confirm the importance of the length of the night in clock controlled induction of diapause in this mosquito.     

Environmental factors controlling the time of flower-opening in Pharbitis nil

Pharbitis nil, strain Violet, subjected to various photoperiods(24-hr cycle at 24?C) bloomed about 10 hr after light-off whenthe light period was 10 hr or longer, and about 20 hr afterlight-on when the light period was shorter. The higher the temperature(20–30?C) during the dark period, the later the time offlower-opening, with the temperature during the last half ofthe dark period having a stronger effect than that during thefirst half. In continuous dark or light, flower buds of Pharbitis openedabout every 24 hr at all temperatures tested between 20 and28?C, which suggests the participation of a circadian rhythmin determining the time of flower-opening. A light pulse given6–12 or 28–36 hr after the onset of the dark periodgreatly advanced the phase of this rhythm (8–10 hr). Phasedelay of this rhythm could not be obtained by light pulses givenat any time. (Received September 29, 1979; )     

Structure and Expression of a Heat-Shock Protein 83 Gene of Pharbitis nil

Four cDNA clones representing mRNAs whose levels were affected by a photoperiod that induces flowering in Pharbitis nil were isolated by a differential hybridization screening procedure. The level of mRNAs represented by three clones (12L, 15L, and 17L) increased following a photoperiod that induces flowering and that represented by the fourth clone (clone 27) increased under conditions in which flowering was inhibited. DNA sequence analysis showed that one cDNA, clone 17L, is homologous to members of the 83- to 90-kD heat-shock protein (hsp) gene family. The corresponding gene, hsp83A, was isolated and its DNA sequence was determined. hsp83A encodes a protein that exhibits 70% amino acid identity with Drosophila melanogaster HSP83. The P. nil hsp83A gene contains two introns within the coding region. hsp83A mRNA was not detectable in cotyledons of plants grown in continuous light, but its level increased transiently following a 14-h dark period and reached a maximum 2 h after the lights were turned on. A dramatic increase in the level of hsp83A mRNA was also found 2 h after an end-of-day dark treatment. Genomic Southern blot analysis demonstrated that the P. nil hsp83-90 gene family consists of at least six members, one of which appears to be constitutively expressed in the light.     

Jasmonates Inhibit Flowering in Short-Day Plant Pharbitis nil

The role of jasmonates in the photoperiodic flower induction of short-day plant Pharbitis nil was investigated. The plants were grown in a special cycle: 72 h of darkness, 24 h of white light with lowered intensity, 24-h long inductive night, 14 days of continuous light. At 4 h of inductive night the cotyledons of non-induced plants contained about two times the amount of endogenous jasmonates (JA/JA-Me) compared to those induced. A 15-min long pulse of far red light (FR) applied at the end of a 24-h long white light phase inhibited flowering of P. nil. The concentration of jasmonates at 2 and 4 h of inductive night in the cotyledons of the plants treated with FR was similar. Red light (R) could reverse the effect of FR. R light applied after FR light decreased the content of jasmonates by about 50%. Methyl jasmonate (JA-Me) applied to cotyledons, shoot apices and cotyledon petioles of P. nil inhibited the formation of flower buds during the first half of a 24-h long inductive or 14-h long subinductive night. Application of JA-Me to the cotyledons was the most effective. None of the plants treated with JA-Me on the cotyledons in the middle of the inductive night formed terminal flower buds. The aspirin, ibuprofen and phenidone, jasmonates biosynthesis inhibitors partially reversed the effect of FR, stimulating the formation of axillary and terminal flower buds. Thus, the results obtained suggests that phytochrome system control both the photoperiodic flower induction and jasmonates metabolism. Jasmonates inhibit flowering in P. nil.