Modulating micro-opioid receptor phosphorylation switches agonist-dependent signaling as reflected in PKCepsilon activation and dendritic spine stability

A new role of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) phosphorylation was demonstrated in the current studies by using the μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1) as a model. Morphine induces a low level of receptor phosphorylation and uses the PKCε pathway to induce ERK phosphorylation and receptor desensitization, whereas etorphine, fentanyl, and [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) induce extensive receptor phosphorylation and use the β-arrestin2 pathway. Blocking OPRM1 phosphorylation (by mutating Ser363, Thr370 and Ser375 to Ala) enabled etorphine, fentanyl, and DAMGO to use the PKCε pathway. This was not due to the decreased recruitment of β-arrestin2 to the receptor signaling complex, because these agonists were unable to use the PKCε pathway when β-arrestin2 was absent. In addition, overexpressing G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) decreased the ability of morphine to activate PKCε, whereas overexpressing dominant-negative GRK2 enabled etorphine, fentanyl, and DAMGO to activate PKCε. Furthermore, by overexpressing wild-type OPRM1 and a phosphorylation-deficient mutant in primary cultures of hippocampal neurons, we demonstrated that receptor phosphorylation contributes to the differential effects of agonists on dendritic spine stability. Phosphorylation blockage made etorphine, fentanyl, and DAMGO function as morphine in the primary cultures. Therefore, agonist-dependent phosphorylation of GPCR regulates the activation of the PKC pathway and the subsequent responses.     

Desensitization of the δ-Opioid Receptor Correlates with Its Phosphorylation in SK-N-BE Cells: Involvement of a G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase

Abstract: Phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors is considered an important step during their desensitization. In SK-N-BE cells, recently presented as a pertinent model for the studies of the human δ-opioid receptor, pretreatment with the opioid agonist etorphine increased time-dependently the rate of phosphorylation of a 51-kDa membrane protein. Immunological characterization of this protein with an antibody, raised against the amino-terminal region of the cloned human δ-opioid receptor, revealed that it corresponded to the δ-opioid receptor. During prolonged treatment with etorphine, phosphorylation increased as early as 15 min to reach a maximum within 1 h. Phosphorylation and desensitization of adenylyl cyclase inhibition paralleled closely and okadaic acid inhibited the resensitization, a result strongly suggesting that phosphorylation of the δ-opioid receptor plays a prominent role in its rapid desensitization. The increase in phosphorylation of the δ-opioid receptor, as well as its desensitization, was not affected by H7, an inhibitor of protein kinase A and protein kinase C, but was drastically reduced by heparin or Zn²⁺, known to act as G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) inhibitors. These results are the first to show, on endogenously expressed human δ-opioid receptor, that a close link exists between receptor phosphorylation and agonist-promoted desensitization and that desensitization involves a GRK.     

Multiple mechanisms involving protein phosphorylation are linked to desensitization of muscarinic receptors

Agonists induce phosphorylation of m2 muscarinic receptors (mAChR) in several cell types. This phosphorylation correlates with desensitization. The mechanisms underlying mAChR phosphorylation have been investigated using several in vitro approaches. Protein kinase C phosphorylated the purified and reconstituted m2 mAChR to a stoichiometry of approximately 5 mols P/mol receptor; this phosphorylation resulted in the decreased ability of receptors to activate G-proteins. Although the phosphorylation by PKC was not modulated by agonist binding to the mAChR, heterotrimeric G-proteins were able to completely block the PKC-mediated effects. If significant receptor/G-protein coupling occurs in vivo, agonists would be required to promote dissociation of the G-proteins from the receptors and reveal the phosphorylation sites for PKC. Members of the G-protein coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family also phosphorylated the purified and reconstituted m2 mAChR. In contrast to PKC, the GRKs phosphorylated the m2 mAChR strictly in an agonist-dependent manner. GRK mediated phosphorylation perturbed receptor/G-protein coupling. In addition, phosphorylation allowed for arrestin binding to the m2 mAChR which should further contribute to desensitization. Using a new strategy that does not require purification and reconstitution of receptors for GRK studies, the m3 mAChR were revealed as substrates for the GRKs. For both the m2 and m3 receptor subtypes, the most effective kinases were GRK 2 and 3. Phosphorylation of the receptors by these enzymes was stimulated by low concentrations of G-proteins and by membrane phospholipids. Thus, multiple mechanisms involving protein phosphorylation appear to contribute to the overall process of mAChR desensitization.     

Agonist-dependent desensitization of the kappa opioid receptor by G protein receptor kinase and beta-arrestin.

We used the Xenopus oocyte expression system to examine the regulation of rat kappa opioid receptor (rKOR) function by G protein receptor kinases (GRKs). kappa agonists increased the conductance of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium channels in oocytes co-expressing KOR with Kir3.1 and Kir3.4. In the absence of added GRK and beta-arrestin 2, desensitization of the kappa agonist-induced potassium current was modest. Co-expression of either GRK3 or GRK5 along with beta-arrestin 2 significantly increased the rate of desensitization, whereas addition of either beta-arrestin 2, GRK3, or GRK5 alone had no effect on the KOR desensitization rate. The desensitization was homologous as co-expressed delta opioid receptor-evoked responses were not affected by KOR desensitization. The rate of GRK3/beta-arrestin 2-dependent desensitization was reduced by truncation of the C-terminal 26 amino acids, KOR(Q355Delta). In contrast, substitution of Ala for Ser within the third intracellular loop [KOR(S255A,S260A, S262A)] did not reduce the desensitization rate. Within the C-terminal region, KOR(S369A) substitution significantly attenuated desensitization, whereas the KOR(T363A) and KOR(S356A,T357A) point mutations did not. These results suggest that co-expression of GRK3 or GRK5 and beta-arrestin 2 produced homologous, agonist-induced desensitization of the kappa opioid receptor by a mechanism requiring the phosphorylation of the serine 369 of rKOR.     

Role of Protein Kinase C (PKC) in Agonist-Induced μ-Opioid Receptor Down-Regulation

Abstract : Agonist-induced down-regulation of opioid receptors appears to require the phosphorylation of the receptor protein. However, the identities of the specific protein kinases that perform this task remain uncertain. Protein kinase C (PKC) has been shown to catalyze the phosphorylation of several G protein-coupled receptors and potentiate their desensitization toward agonists. However, it is unknown whether opioid receptor agonists induce PKC activation under physiological conditions. Using cultured SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, which naturally express μ- and δ-opioid receptors, we investigated whether μ-opioid receptor agonists can activate PKC by measuring enzyme translocation to the membrane fraction. PKC translocation and opioid receptor densities were simultaneously measured by ³H-phorbol ester and [³H]diprenorphine binding, respectively, to correlate alterations in PKC localization with changes in receptor binding sites. We observed that μ-opioid agonists have a dual effect on membrane PKC density depending on the period of drug exposure. Exposure for 2-6 h to [ d -Ala², N -Me-Phe⁴, Gly-ol]enkephalin or morphine promotes the translocation of PKC from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. Longer periods of opioid exposure (>12 h) produce a decrease in membrane-bound PKC density to a level well below basal. A significant decrease in [³H]diprenorphine binding sites is first observed at 2 h and continues to decline through the last time point measured (48 h). The opioid receptor antagonist naloxone attenuated both opioid-mediated PKC translocation and receptor down-regulation. These results demonstrate that opioids are capable of activating PKC, as evidenced by enhanced translocation of the enzyme to the cell membrane, and this finding suggests that PKC may have a physiological role in opioid receptor plasticity.     

Phosphorylation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta and epidermal growth factor receptor by G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2. Mechanisms for selectivity of desensitization

Accumulating evidence suggests that receptor protein-tyrosine kinases, like the platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFRbeta) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), may be desensitized by serine/threonine kinases. One such kinase, G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2), is known to mediate agonist-dependent phosphorylation and desensitization of multiple heptahelical receptors. In testing whether GRK2 could phosphorylate and desensitize the PDGFRbeta, we first found by phosphoamino acid analysis that cells expressing GRK2 could serine-phosphorylate the PDGFRbeta in an agonist-dependent manner. Augmentation or inhibition of GRK2 activity in cells, respectively, reduced or enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of the PDGFRbeta but not the EGFR. Either overexpressed in cells or as a purified protein, GRK2 demonstrated agonist-promoted serine phosphorylation of the PDGFRbeta and, unexpectedly, the EGFR as well. Because GRK2 did not phosphorylate a kinase-dead (K634R) PDGFRbeta mutant, GRK2-mediated PDGFRbeta phosphorylation required receptor tyrosine kinase activity, as does PDGFRbeta ubiquitination. Agonist-induced ubiquitination of the PDGFRbeta, but not the EGFR, was enhanced in cells overexpressing GRK2. Nevertheless, GRK2 overexpression did not augment PDGFRbeta down-regulation. Like the vast majority of GRK2 substrates, the PDGFRbeta, but not the EGFR, activated heterotrimeric G proteins allosterically in membranes from cells expressing physiologic protein levels. We conclude that GRK2 can phosphorylate and desensitize the PDGFRbeta, perhaps through mechanisms related to receptor ubiquitination. Specificity of GRK2 for receptor protein-tyrosine kinases, expressed at physiologic levels, may be determined by the ability of these receptors to activate heterotrimeric G proteins, among other factors.     

Mu-opioid receptor desensitization: role of receptor phosphorylation,internalization, and representation

It is generally accepted that the internalization and desensitization of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) involves receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestin recruitment. However, a mutant MOR, which is truncated after the amino acid residue Ser363 (MOR363D), was found to undergo phosphorylation-independent internalization and desensitization. As expected, MOR363D, missing the putative agonist-induced phosphorylation sites, did not exhibit detectable agonist-induced phosphorylation. MOR363D underwent slower internalization as reflected in the attenuation of membrane translocation of beta-arrestin 2 when compared with wild type MOR, but the level of receptor being internalized was similar to that of wild type MOR after 4 h of etorphine treatment. Furthermore, MOR363D was observed to desensitize faster than that of wild type MOR upon agonist activation. Surface biotinylation assay demonstrated that the wild type receptors recycled back to membrane after agonist-induced internalization, which contributed to the receptor resensitization and thus partially reversed the receptor desensitization. On the contrary, MOR363D did not recycle after internalization. Hence, MOR desensitization is controlled by the receptor internalization and the recycling of internalized receptor to cell surface in an active state. Taken together, our data indicated that receptor phosphorylation is not absolutely required in the internalization, but receptor phosphorylation and subsequent beta-arrestin recruitment play important roles in the resensitization of internalized receptors.     

Threonine 308 within a putative casein kinase 2 site of the cytoplasmic tail of leukotriene B(4) receptor (BLT1) is crucial for ligand-induced,G-protein-coupled receptor-specific kinase 6-mediated desensitization

Desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors may involve phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues. The leukotriene B(4) (LTB(4)) receptor (BLT1) contains 14 intracellular serines and threonines, 8 of which are part of consensus target sequences for protein kinase C (PKC) or casein kinase 2. In this study, we investigated the importance of PKC and GPCR-specific kinase (GRK) phosphorylation in BLT1 desensitization. Pretreatment of BLT1-transfected COS-7 cells with PKC activators caused a decrease of LTB(4)-induced inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation. This reduction was prevented with the PKC inhibitor, staurosporine, and not observed in cells expressing a BLT1 deletion mutant (G291stop) lacking the cytoplasmic tail. Moreover LTB(4)-induced IP accumulation was significantly inhibited by overexpression of GRK2, GRK5, and especially GRK6, in cells expressing wild type BLT1 but not in those expressing G291stop. GRK6-mediated desensitization correlated with increased phosphorylation of BLT1. The G319stop truncated BLT1 mutant displayed functional characteristics comparable with wild type BLT1 in terms of desensitization by GRK6, but not by PKC. Substitution of Thr(308) within a putative casein kinase 2 site to proline or alanine in the full-length BLT1 receptor prevented most of GRK6-mediated inhibition of LTB(4)-induced IP production but only partially affected LTB(4)-induced BLT1 phosphorylation. Our findings thus suggest that Thr(308) is a major residue involved in GRK6-mediated desensitization of BLT1 signaling.     

Acute agonist-mediated desensitization of the human alpha 1a-adrenergic receptor is primarily independent of carboxyl terminus regulation: implications for regulation of alpha 1aAR splice variants.

Despite important roles in myocardial hypertrophy and benign prostatic hyperplasia, little is known about acute effects of agonist stimulation on alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1a)AR) signaling and function. Regulatory mechanisms are likely complex since 12 distinct human alpha(1a)AR carboxyl-terminal splice variants have been isolated. After determining the predominance of the alpha(1a-1)AR isoform in human heart and prostate, we stably expressed an epitope-tagged alpha(1a-1)AR cDNA in rat-1 fibroblasts and subsequently examined regulation of signaling, phosphorylation, and internalization of the receptor. Human alpha(1a)AR-mediated inositol phosphate signaling is acutely desensitized in response to both agonist and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) exposure. Concurrent with desensitization, alpha(1a)ARs in (32)P(i)-labeled cells are rapidly phosphorylated in response to both NE and PMA stimulation. Despite the ability of PKC to desensitize alpha(1a)ARs when directly activated with PMA, inhibitors of PKC have no effect on agonist-mediated desensitization. In contrast, involvement of GRK kinases is suggested by the ability of GRK2 to desensitize alpha(1a)ARs. Internalization of cell surface alpha(1a)ARs also occurs in response to agonist stimulation (but not PKC activation), but is initiated more slowly than receptor desensitization. Significantly, deletion of the alpha(1a)AR carboxyl terminus has no effect on receptor internalization or either agonist-induced or GRK-mediated receptor desensitization. Because mechanisms underlying acute agonist-mediated regulation of human alpha(1a)ARs are primarily independent of the carboxyl terminus, they may be common to all functional alpha(1a)AR isoforms.     

Agonist-specific regulation of delta-opioid receptor trafficking by G protein-coupled receptor kinase and beta-arrestin

Opioid receptors mediate multiple biological functions through their interaction with endogenous opioid peptides as well as opioid alkaloids including morphine and etorphine. Previously we have reported that the ability of distinct opioid agonists to differentially regulate mu-opioid receptor (mu OR) responsiveness is related to their ability to promote G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-dependent phosphorylation of the receptor (1). In the present study, we further examined the role of GRK and beta-arrestin in agonist-specific regulation of the delta-opioid receptor (delta OR). While both etorphine and morphine effectively activate the delta OR, only etorphine triggers robust delta OR phosphorylation followed by plasma membrane translocation of beta-arrestin and receptor internalization. In contrast, morphine is unable to either elicit delta OR phosphorylation or stimulate beta-arrestin translocation, correlating with its inability to cause delta OR internalization. Unlike for the mu OR, overexpression of GRK2 results in neither the enhancement of delta OR sequestration nor the rescue of delta OR-mediated beta-arrestin translocation. Therefore, our findings not only point to the existence of marked differences in the ability of different opioid agonists to promote delta OR phosphorylation by GRK and binding to beta-arrestin, but also demonstrate differences in the regulation of two opioid receptor subtypes. These observations may have important implications for our understanding of the distinct ability of various opioids in inducing opioid tolerance and addiction.     

Cross-regulation of VPAC(2) receptor desensitization by M(3) receptors via PKC-mediated phosphorylation of RKIP and inhibition of GRK2

In gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells, VPAC(2) receptor desensitization is exclusively mediated by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2). The present study examined the mechanisms by which acetylcholine (ACh) acting via M(3) receptors regulates GRK2-mediated VPAC(2) receptor desensitization in gastric smooth muscle cells. Vasoactive intestinal peptide induced VPAC(2) receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization in both freshly dispersed and cultured smooth muscle cells. Costimulation with ACh in the presence of M(2) receptor antagonist (i.e., activation of M(3) receptors) inhibited VPAC(2) receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization. Inhibition was blocked by the selective protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide, suggesting that the inhibition was mediated by PKC, derived from M(3) receptor activation. Similar results were obtained by direct activation of PKC with phorbol myristate acetate. In the presence of the M(2) receptor antagonist, ACh induced phosphorylation of Raf kinase inhibitory protein (RKIP), increased RKIP-GRK2 association, decreased RKIP-Raf-1 association, and stimulated ERK1/2 activity, suggesting that, upon phosphorylation by PKC, RKIP dissociates from its known target Raf to associate with, and block the activity of, GRK2. In muscle cells expressing RKIP(S153A), which lacks the PKC phosphorylation site, RKIP phosphorylation was blocked and the inhibitory effect of ACh on VPAC(2) receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization and the stimulatory effect on ERK1/2 activation were abolished. This study identified a novel mechanism of cross-regulation of G(s)-coupled receptor phosphorylation and internalization by G(q)-coupled receptors. The mechanism involved phosphorylation of RKIP by PKC, switching RKIP from association with Raf-1 to association with, and inhibition of, GRK2.     

δ-Opioid receptor-stimulated Akt signaling in neuroblastoma × glioma (NG108-15) hybrid cells involves receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated PI3K activation

δ-Opioid receptor (DOR) agonists possess cytoprotective properties, an effect associated with activation of the “pro-survival” kinase Akt. Here we delineate the signal transduction pathway by which opioids induce Akt activation in neuroblastoma × glioma (NG108-15) hybrid cells. Exposure of the cells to both [D-Pen^2,5]enkephalin and etorphine resulted in a time- and dose-dependent increase in Akt activity, as measured by means of an activation-specific antibody recognizing phosphoserine-473. DOR-mediated Akt signaling is blocked by the opioid antagonist naloxone and involves inhibitory G_i/o proteins, because pre-treatment with pertussis toxin, but not over-expression of the G_q/11 scavengers EBP50 and GRK2-K220R, prevented this effect. Further studies with Wortmannin and LY294002 revealed that phophoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) plays a central role in opioid-induced Akt activation. Opioids stimulate Akt activity through transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), because pre-treatment of the cells with inhibitors for neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinases (AG879) and the insulin-like growth factor receptor IGF-1 (AG1024), but not over-expression of the Gβγ scavenger phosducin, abolished this effect. Activated Akt translocates to the nuclear membrane, where it promotes GSK3 phosphorylation and prevents caspase-3 cleavage, two key events mediating inhibition of cell apoptosis and enhancement of cell survival. Taken together, these results demonstrate that in NG108-15 hybrid cells DOR agonists possess cytoprotective properties mediated by activation of the RTK/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.     

Serine 363 Is Required for Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Opioid Receptor (NOPR) Desensitization,Internalization, and Arrestin Signaling

We determined the role of carboxyl-terminal regulation of NOPR (nociceptin, orphanin FQ receptor) signaling and function. We mutated C-terminal serine and threonine residues and examined their role in NOPR trafficking, homologous desensitization, and arrestin-dependent MAPK signaling. The NOPR agonist, nociceptin, caused robust NOPR-YFP receptor internalization, peaking at 30 min. Mutation of serine 337, 346, and 351, had no effect on NOPR internalization. However, mutation of C-terminal threonine 362, serine 363, and threonine 365 blocked nociceptin-induced internalization of NOPR. Furthermore, point mutation of only Ser-363 was sufficient to block NOPR internalization. Homologous desensitization of NOPR-mediated calcium channel blockade and inhibition of cAMP were also shown to require Ser-363. Additionally, NOPR internalization was absent when GRK3, and Arrestin3 were knocked down using siRNA, but not when GRK2 and Arrestin2 were knocked down. We also found that nociceptin-induced NOPR-mediated JNK but not ERK signaling requires Ser-363, GRK3, and Arrestin3. Dominant-positive Arrestin3 but not Arrestin2 was sufficient to rescue NOPR-S363A internalization and JNK signaling. These findings suggest that NOPR function may be regulated by GRK3 phosphorylation of Ser-363 and Arrestin3 and further demonstrates the complex nature of G-protein-dependent and -independent signaling in opioid receptors.     

Mutagenesis of a Single Amino Acid in the Rat μ-Opioid Receptor Discriminates Ligand Binding

Abstract: To investigate the role of Asp¹¹⁴ in the cloned rat μ-opioid receptor for ligand binding, the charged amino acid was mutated to an asparagine to generate the mutant μ receptor D114N. The wild-type μ receptor and the D114N mutant were then stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, and the binding affinities of a series of opioids were investigated. The μ-selective agonists [ d -Ala²,MePhe⁴,Gly-ol⁵]enkephalin and morphine and the endogenous peptides Met-enkephalin and β-endorphin exhibited greatly reduced affinities for the D114N mutant compared with the wild-type μ receptor, as did the potent synthetic agonist etorphine. In contrast to the full agonists, the partial agonists buprenorphine and nalorphine and the antagonists diprenorphine and naloxone bound with similar affinities to the wild-type and D114N mutant μ receptors. The reduced affinities of the full agonists for the D114N mutant did not involve an uncoupling of the receptor from G proteins because methadone and etorphine stimulated the D114N μ receptors to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Although the Asp¹¹⁴ to Asn¹¹⁴ mutation reduced full-agonist binding, mutation of His²⁹⁷ to Asn²⁹⁷ in the μ receptor did not but, in contrast, did reduce binding affinity of the partial agonist buprenorphine and the antagonist diprenorphine. These results indicate that some partial agonists and antagonists may have different determinants for binding to the μ receptor than do the prototypical full agonists.     

G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinases of the GRK4 Protein Subfamily Phosphorylate Inactive G Protein-coupled Receptors (GPCRs)

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) play a key role in homologous desensitization of GPCRs. It is widely assumed that most GRKs selectively phosphorylate only active GPCRs. Here, we show that although this seems to be the case for the GRK2/3 subfamily, GRK5/6 effectively phosphorylate inactive forms of several GPCRs, including β2-adrenergic and M2 muscarinic receptors, which are commonly used as representative models for GPCRs. Agonist-independent GPCR phosphorylation cannot be explained by constitutive activity of the receptor or membrane association of the GRK, suggesting that it is an inherent ability of GRK5/6. Importantly, phosphorylation of the inactive β₂-adrenergic receptor enhanced its interactions with arrestins. Arrestin-3 was able to discriminate between phosphorylation of the same receptor by GRK2 and GRK5, demonstrating preference for the latter. Arrestin recruitment to inactive phosphorylated GPCRs suggests that not only agonist activation but also the complement of GRKs in the cell regulate formation of the arrestin-receptor complex and thereby G protein-independent signaling.     

Bimodal regulation of the human H1 histamine receptor by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

The H1 histamine receptor (H1HR) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and regulates numerous cellular functions through its activation of the G(q/11) subfamily of heterotrimeric G proteins. Although the H1HR has been shown to undergo desensitization in multiple cell types, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of H1HR signaling are poorly defined. To address this issue, we examined the effects of wild type and mutant G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) on the phosphorylation and signaling of human H1HR in HEK293 cells. Overexpression of GRK2 promoted H1HR phosphorylation in intact HEK293 cells and completely inhibited inositol phosphate production stimulated by H1HR, whereas GRK5 and GRK6 had lesser effects on H1HR phosphorylation and signaling. Interestingly, catalytically inactive GRK2 (GRK2-K220R) also significantly attenuated H1HR-mediated inositol phosphate production, as did an N-terminal fragment of GRK2 previously characterized as a regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein for Galpha(q/11). Disruption of this RGS function in holo-GRK2 by mutation (GRK2-D110A) partially reversed the quenching effect of GRK2, whereas deletion of both the kinase activity and RGS function (GRK2-D110A/K220R) effectively relieved the inhibition of inositol phosphate generation. To evaluate the role of endogenous GRKs on H1HR regulation, we used small interfering RNAs to selectively target GRK2 and GRK5, two of the primary GRKs expressed in HEK293 cells. A GRK2-specific small interfering RNA effectively reduced GRK2 expression and resulted in a significant increase in histamine-promoted calcium flux. In contrast, knockdown of GRK5 expression was without effect on H1HR signaling. These findings demonstrate that GRK2 is the principal kinase mediating H1 histamine receptor desensitization in HEK293 cells and suggest that rapid termination of H1HR signaling is mediated by both the kinase activity and RGS function of GRK2.     

G Protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 regulator of G protein signaling homology domain binds to both metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a and Galphaq to attenuate signaling

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding (G) protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are cytosolic proteins that contribute to the adaptation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling. The canonical model for GRK-dependent receptor desensitization involves GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation to promote the binding of arrestin proteins that sterically block receptor coupling to G proteins. However, GRK-mediated desensitization, in the absence of phosphorylation and arrestin binding, has been reported for metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) and gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptors. Here we show that GRK2 mutants impaired in Galphaq/11 binding (R106A, D110A, and M114A), bind effectively to mGluR1a, but do not mediate mGluR1a adaptation. Galphaq/11 is immunoprecipitated as a complex with mGluR1a in the absence of agonist, and either agonist treatment or GRK2 overexpression promotes the dissociation of the receptor/Galphaq/11 complex. However, these mGluR1a/Galphaq/11 interactions are not antagonized by the overexpression of either GRK2 mutants defective in Galphaq/11 binding or RGS4. We have also identified a GRK2-D527A mutant that binds Galphaq/11 in an AlF4(-)-dependent manner but is unable to either bind mGluR1a or attenuate mGluR1a signaling. We conclude that the mechanism underlying GRK2 phosphorylation-independent attenuation of mGluR1a signaling is RH domain-dependent, requiring the binding of GRK2 to both Galphaq/11 and mGluR1a. This serves to coordinate GRK2 interactions with Galphaq/11 and to disrupt receptor/Galphaq/11 complexes. Our findings indicate that GRK2 regulates receptor/G protein interactions, in addition to its traditional role as a receptor kinase.     

Agonist-Specific Regulation of δ-Opioid Receptor Trafficking by G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase and β-Arrestin

Abstract

Opioid receptors mediate multiple biological functions through their interaction with endogenous opioid peptides as well as opioid alkaloids including morphine and etorphine. Previously we have reported that the ability of distinct opioid agonists to differentially regulate μ-opioid receptor (μOR) responsiveness is related to their ability to promote G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-dependent phosphorylation of the receptor (1). In the present study, we further examined the role of GRK and β-arrestin in agonist-specific regulation of the δ-opioid receptor (δOR). While both etorphine and morphine effectively activate the δOR, only etorphine triggers robust δOR phosphorylation followed by plasma membrane translocation of β-arrestin and receptor internalization. In contrast, morphine is unable to either elicit δOR phosphorylation or stimulate β-arrestin translocation, correlating with its inability to cause δOR internalization. Unlike for the μOR, overexpression of GRK2 results in neither the enhancement of δOR sequestration nor the rescue of δOR-mediated β-arrestin translocation. Therefore, our findings not only point to the existence of marked differences in the ability of different opioid agonists to promote δOR phosphorylation by GRK and binding to β-arrestin, but also demonstrate differences in the regulation of two opioid receptor subtypes. These observations may have important implications for our understanding of the distinct ability of various opioids in inducing opioid tolerance and addiction.     

Agonist-induced formation of opioid receptor-G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-G beta gamma complex on membrane is required for GRK2 function in vivo

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) catalyze agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation on the membrane and initiate receptor desensitization. Previous in vitro studies have shown that the binding of GRK to membrane-associated G beta gamma subunits plays an important role in translocation of GRK2 from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane. The current study investigated the role of the interaction of GRK2 with the activated delta-opioid receptor (DOR) and G beta gamma subunits in the membrane translocation and function of GRK2 using intact human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Our results showed that agonist treatment induced GRK2 binding to DOR, GRK2 translocation to the plasma membrane, and DOR phosphorylation in cells expressing the wild-type DOR but not the mutant DOR lacking the carboxyl terminus, which contains all three GRK2 phosphorylation sites. DORs with the GRK2 phosphorylation sites modified (M3) or with the acidic residues flanking phosphorylation sites mutated (E355Q/D364N) failed to be phosphorylated in response to agonist stimulation. Agonist-induced GRK2 membrane translocation and GRK-receptor association were observed in cells expressing M3 but not E355Q/D364N. Moreover, over-expression of G beta gamma subunits promoted GRK2 binding to DOR, whereas over-expression of transducin alpha or the carboxyl terminus of GRK2 blocked binding. Further study demonstrated that agonist stimulation induced the formation of a complex containing DOR, GRK2, and G beta gamma subunits in the cell and that agonist-stimulated formation of this complex is essential for the stable localization of GRK2 on the membrane and for its catalytic activity in vivo.