Dimerization specificity of P22 and 434 repressors is determined by multiple polypeptide segments.

The repressor protein of bacteriophage P22 binds to DNA as a homodimer. This dimerization is absolutely required for DNA binding. Dimerization is mediated by interactions between amino acids in the carboxyl (C)-terminal domain. We have constructed a plasmid, p22CT-1, which directs the overproduction of just the C-terminal domain of the P22 repressor (P22CT-1). Addition of P22CT-1 to DNA-bound P22 repressor causes the dissociation of the complex. Cross-linking experiments show that P22CT-1 forms specific heterodimers with the intact P22 repressor protein, indicating that inhibition of P22 repressor DNA binding by P22CT-1 is mediated by the formation of DNA binding-inactive P22 repressor:P22CT-1 heterodimers. We have taken advantage of the highly conserved amino acid sequences within the C-terminal domains of the P22 and 434 repressors and have created chimeric proteins to help identify amino acid regions required for dimerization specificity. Our results indicate that the dimerization specificity region of these proteins is concentrated in three segments of amino acid sequence that are spread across the C-terminal domain of each of the two phage repressors. We also show that the set of amino acids that forms the cooperativity interface of the P22 repressor may be distinct from those that form its dimer interface. Furthermore, cooperativity studies of the wild-type and chimeric proteins suggest that the location of cooperativity interface in the 434 repressor may also be distinct from that of its dimerization interface. Interestingly, changes in the dimer interface decreases the ability of the 434 repressor to discriminate between its wild-type binding sites, O(R)1, O(R)2, and O(R)3. Since 434 repressor discrimination between these sites depends in large part on the ability of this protein to recognize sequence-specific differences in DNA structure and flexibility, this result indicates that the C-terminal domain is intimately involved in the recognition of sequence-dependent differences in DNA structure and flexibility.     

The tRNA-binding moiety in GCN2 contains a dimerization domain that interacts with the kinase domain and is required for tRNA binding and kinase activation

GCN2 stimulates translation of GCN4 mRNA in amino acid-starved cells by phosphorylating translation initiation factor 2. GCN2 is activated by binding of uncharged tRNA to a domain related to histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS). The HisRS-like region contains two dimerization domains (HisRS-N and HisRS-C) required for GCN2 function in vivo but dispensable for dimerization by full-length GCN2. Residues corresponding to amino acids at the dimer interface of Escherichia coli HisRS were required for dimerization of recombinant HisRS-N and for tRNA binding by full-length GCN2, suggesting that HisRS-N dimerization promotes tRNA binding and kinase activation. HisRS-N also interacted with the protein kinase (PK) domain, and a deletion impairing this interaction destroyed GCN2 function without reducing tRNA binding; thus, HisRS-N-PK interaction appears to stimulate PK function. The C-terminal domain of GCN2 (C-term) interacted with the PK domain in a manner disrupted by an activating PK mutation (E803V). These results suggest that the C-term is an autoinhibitory domain, counteracted by tRNA binding. We conclude that multiple domain interactions, positive and negative, mediate the activation of GCN2 by uncharged tRNA.     

PNA zipper as a dimerization tool: Development of a bZip mimic

The article describes the use of a PNA duplex (PNA zipper) as a tool to dimerize or bring in close proximity two polypeptides or protein domains. The amino acid sequence to be dimerized is covalently bound to complementary PNA sequences. Annealing of the PNA strands results in dimer formation. To test the ability of the “PNA‐zipper” as a dimerization tool, we designed a GCN4 mimetic, where the leucine‐zipper dimerization domain was replaced by the PNA zipper, whereas the basic DNA‐binding domain was covalently attached to the PNA. The molecule was assembled by chemical ligation of the peptide corresponding to the DNA‐binding domain of GCN4 modified with a succinyl thioester with two complementary PNAs harboring a cysteine residue. Electromobility‐shift experiments show the ability of the PNA zipper‐GCN4 to bind selected DNA duplexes. The PNA zipper‐GCN4 binds both the TRE and CRE DNA sites, but it does not bind TRE and CRE mutants containing even a single base mutation, as the native GCN4. The ability to fold upon complexation with DNA was investigated by CD. A good correlation between the ability of the PNA zipper‐GCN4 to fold into α helices and the ability to bind DNA was found. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 93: 434–441, 2010. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com     

Structure-based design of a leucine zipper protein with new DNA contacting region

We have employed a structure-based design to construct a small folding domain from the F-actin bundling protein villin that contains the amino acids necessary for the DNA binding of the basic leucine zipper protein GCN4 and have compared its DNA binding with GCN4. The monomeric motif folds into a stable domain and binds DNA in a rigid-body mechanism, while its affinity is not higher than that of the basic region peptide. The addition of the leucine zipper region to the folded domain restored its sequence-specific DNA binding comparable to that of GCN4. Unlike the monomeric folded domain, its leucine zipper derivative undergoes a conformational change upon DNA binding. CD spectral and thermodynamic studies indicate that the DNA-contacting region is folded in the presence or absence of DNA and suggest that the junction between the DNA-contacting and the leucine zipper regions transits to a helix in the presence of DNA. These results demonstrate that the structural transition outside the direct-contacting region, which adjusts the precise location of the DNA-contacting region, plays a critical role in the specific complex formation of basic leucine zipper proteins.     

The ORFa protein, the putative transposase of maize transposable element Ac, has a basic DNA binding domain.

Ac encodes the 807 amino acid ORFa protein which binds specifically to multiple AAACGG motifs that are subterminally located in both ends of Ac. The wild-type ORFa protein and a number of deletion and amino acid exchange mutants were expressed in Escherichia coli, renatured and used for mobility shift assays. At least 136 amino acids from the N-terminus and 537 C-terminal amino acids may be removed from the ORFa protein without destroying the DNA binding domain, whereas a protein starting at amino acid 189 is DNA binding deficient. Certain basic amino acids between positions 190 and 200 are essential for DNA binding, as their substitution with uncharged amino acids leads to the loss of this function. The DNA binding domain of ORFa protein has an overall basic character, but no obvious sequence homology to any other known DNA binding protein. The homologies to the major open reading frames of transposable elements Tam3 from Antirrhinum majus and Hobo from Drosophila are found between the C-terminal two thirds of the three proteins. The ORFa protein forms discrete complexes with target DNA that appear, depending on the protein concentration, as a 'ladder' of bands on gels, indicating the occupation of target DNA by multiple ORFa protein molecules.     

Deletion mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli UvrA protein localizes domains for DNA binding, damage recognition, and protein-protein interactions.

The UvrA protein is the DNA binding and damage recognition subunit of the damage-specific UvrABC endonuclease. In addition, it is an ATPase/GTPase, and the binding energy of ATP is linked to dimerization of the UvrA protein. Furthermore, the UvrA protein interacts with the UvrB protein to modulate its activities, both in solution and in association with DNA, where the UvrAB complex possesses a helicase activity. The domains of the UvrA protein that sponsor each of these activities were localized within the protein by studying the in vitro properties of a set of purified deletion mutants of the UvrA protein. A region located within the first 230 amino acids was found to contain the minimal region necessary for interactions with UvrB, the UvrA dimerization interface was localized to within the first 680 amino acids, and the DNA binding domain lies within the first 900 amino acids of the 940-amino acid UvrA protein. Two damage recognition domains were detected. The first domain, which coincides with the DNA binding region, is required to detect the damage. The second domain, located on or near the C-terminal 40 amino acids, stabilizes the protein-DNA complex when damage is encountered.     

Dual DNA recognition codes of a short peptide derived from the basic leucine zipper protein EmBP1

Sequence-specific DNA binding of short peptide dimers derived from a plant basic leucine zipper protein EmBP1 was studied. A homodimer of the EmBP1 basic region peptide recognized a palindromic DNA sequence, and a heterodimer of EmBP1 and GCN4 basic region peptides targets a non-palindromic DNA sequence when a beta-cyclodextrin/adamantane complex is utilized as a dimerization domain. A homodimer of the EmBP1 basic region peptide binds the native EmBP1 binding 5'-GCCACGTGGC-3' and the native GCN4 binding 5'-ATGACGTCAT-3' sequences with almost equal affinity in the alpha-helical conformation, indicating that the basic region of EmBP1 by itself has a dual recognition codes for the DNA sequences. The GCN4 basic region peptide binds 5'-ATGAC-3' in the alpha-helical conformation, but it neither shows affinity nor helix formation with 5'-GCCAC-3'. Because native EmBP1 forms 100 times more stable complex with 5'-GCCACGTGGC-3' over 5'-ATGACGTCAT-3', our results suggest that the sequence-selectivity of native EmBP1 is dictated by the structure of leucine zipper dimerization domain including the hinge region spanning between the basic region and the leucine zipper.     

Structure-Based Mutational Analysis of the C-Terminal DNA-Binding Domain of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase: Critical Residues for Protein Oligomerization and DNA Binding

The C-terminal domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase (IN) is a dimer that binds to DNA in a nonspecific manner. The structure of the minimal region required for DNA binding (IN_220–270) has been solved by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The overall fold of the C-terminal domain of HIV-1 IN is similar to those of Src homology region 3 domains. Based on the structure of IN_220–270, we studied the role of 15 amino acid residues potentially involved in DNA binding and oligomerization by mutational analysis. We found that two amino acid residues, arginine 262 and leucine 234, contribute to DNA binding in the context of IN_220–270, as indicated by protein-DNA UV cross-link analysis. We also analyzed mutant proteins representing portions of the full-length IN protein. Amino acid substitution of residues located in the hydrophobic dimer interface, such as L241A and L242A, results in the loss of oligomerization of IN; consequently, the levels of 3′ processing, DNA strand transfer, and intramolecular disintegration are strongly reduced. These results suggest that dimerization of the C-terminal domain of IN is important for correct multimerization of IN.     

Expression, purification, and functional characterization of the carboxyl-terminal domain fragment of bacteriophage 434 repressor.

The repressor protein of bacteriophage 434 binds to DNA as a dimer of identical subunits. Its strong dimerization is mediated by the carboxyl-terminal domain. Cooperative interactions between the C-terminal domains of two repressor dimers bound at adjacent sites can stabilize protein-DNA complexes formed with low-affinity binding sites. We have constructed a plasmid, pCT1, which directs the overproduction of the carboxyl-terminal domain of 434 repressor. The protein encoded by this plasmid is called CT-1. Cells transformed with pCT1 are unable to be lysogenized by wild-type 434 phage, whereas control cells are lysogenized at an efficiency of 1 to 5%. The CT-1-mediated interference with lysogen formation presumably results from formation of heteromeric complexes between the phage-encoded repressor and the plasmid-encoded carboxyl-terminal domain fragment. These heteromers are unable to bind DNA and thereby inhibit the repressor's activity in promoting lysogen formation. Two lines of evidence support this conclusion. First, DNase I footprinting experiments show that at a 2:1 ratio of CT-1 to intact 434 repressor, purified CT-1 protein prevents the formation of complexes between 434 repressor and its OR1 binding site. Second, cross-linking experiments reveal that only a specific heterodimeric complex forms between CT-1 and intact 434 repressor. This latter observation indicates that CT-1 interferes with 434 repressor-operator complex formation by preventing dimerization and not by altering the conformation of the DNA-bound repressor dimer. Our other evidence is also consistent with this suggestion. We have used deletion analysis in an attempt to define the region which mediates the 434 repressor-CT-1 interaction. CT-1 proteins which have more than the last 14 amino acids removed are unable to interfere with 434 repressor action in vivo.     

Stability of the dimerization domain effects the cooperative DNA binding of short peptides

The basic region peptide derived from the basic leucine zipper protein GCN4 bound specifically to the native GCN4 binding sequences in a dimeric form when the beta-cyclodextrin/adamantane dimerization domain was introduced at the C-terminus of the GCN4 basic region peptide. We describe here how the structure and stability of the dimerization domain affect the cooperative formation of the peptide dimer-DNA complex. The basic region peptides with five different guest molecules were synthesized, and their equilibrium dissociation constants with a peptide possessing beta-cyclodextrin were determined. These values, ranging from 1.3 to 15 microM, were used to estimate the stability of the complexes between the dimers with various guest/cyclodextrin dimerization domains and GCN4 target sequences. An efficient cooperative formation of the dimer complexes at the GCN4 binding sequence was observed when the adamantyl group was replaced with the norbornyl or noradamantyl group, but not with the cyclohexyl group that formed a beta-cyclodextrin complex with a stability that was 1 order of magnitude lower than that of the adamantyl group. Thus, cooperative formation of the stable dimer-DNA complex appeared to be effected by the stability of the dimerization domain. For the peptides that cooperatively formed dimer-DNA complexes, there was no linear correlation between the stability of the inclusion complex and that of the dimer-DNA complex. With the beta-cyclodextrin/adamantane dimerization domain, the basic region peptide dimer preferred to bind to a palindromic 5'-ATGACGTCAT-3' sequence over the sequence lacking the central G.C base pair and that with an additional G.C base pair in the middle. Changing the adamantyl group into a norbornyl group did not alter the preferential binding of the peptide dimers to the palindromic sequence, but slightly affected the selectivity of the dimer for other nonpalindromic sequences. The helical contents of the peptides in the DNA-bound dimer with the adamantyl group were decreased by reducing the stability of the dimer-DNA complex, which was possibly caused by deformation of the helical structure proximal to the dimerization domain.