Mapping of the RNA recognition site of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S7

Bacterial ribosomal protein S7 initiates the folding of the 3' major domain of 16S ribosomal RNA by binding to its lower half. The X-ray structure of protein S7 from thermophilic bacteria was recently solved and found to be a modular structure, consisting of an alpha-helical domain with a beta-ribbon extension. To gain further insights into its interaction with rRNA, we cloned the S7 gene from Escherichia coli K12 into a pET expression vector and introduced 4 deletions and 12 amino acid substitutions in the protein sequence. The binding of each mutant to the lower half of the 3' major domain of 16S rRNA was assessed by filtration on nitrocellulose membranes. Deletion of the N-terminal 17 residues or deletion of the B hairpins (residues 72-89) severely decreased S7 affinity for the rRNA. Truncation of the C-terminal portion (residues 138-178), which includes part of the terminal alpha-helix, significantly affected S7 binding, whereas a shorter truncation (residues 148-178) only marginally influenced its binding. Severe effects were also observed with several strategic point mutations located throughout the protein, including Q8A and F17G in the N-terminal region, and K35Q, G54S, K113Q, and M115G in loops connecting the alpha-helices. Our results are consistent with the occurrence of several sites of contact between S7 and the 16S rRNA, in line with its role in the folding of the 3' major domain.     

Analysis of the Ribosome Large Subunit Assembly and 23 S rRNA Stabilityin Vivo

The ability of mutant 23 S ribosomal RNA to form particles with proteins of the large ribosomal subunitin vivowas studied. A series of overlapping deletions covering the entire 23 S rRNA, were constructed in the plasmid copy of anE. coli23 S rRNA gene. The mutant genes were expressedin vivousing an inducibletacpromoter. Mutant species of 23 S rRNA, containing deletions between positions 40 and 2773, were incorporated into stable ribonucleoprotein particles. In contrast, if one end of the 23 S rRNA was deleted, the mutant rRNA was unstable and did not form ribosomal particles. Protein composition of the mutant particles was specific; the presence of the primary rRNA-binding proteins corresponded to their known binding sites. Furthermore, several previously unknown ribosomal protein binding sites in 23 S rRNA were identified. Implications of the results on ribosome assembly are discussed.     

Ribosomal protein-nucleic acid interactions. I. Isolation of a polypeptide fragment from 30S protein S8 which binds to 16S rRNA.

Within the bacterial ribosome a large number of specific protein and rRNA interactions appear to be required for assembly of the particle and its subsequent function in protein synthesis. In this communication it is shown that it is possible to isolate cyanogen bromide digestion products from ribosomal 30S protein S8 which will interact stoichiometrically with 16S rRNA. In addition to this a small binding polypeptide was generated from S8-16S rRNA complexes which were treated with proteinase K. The digestion of the complex yields a "protected" fragment of protein S8 which binds to 16S-rRNA. The isolated fragment will reassociate with 16S rRNA. It is not displaced by other 30S ribosomal proteins and blocks the binding of intact S8 to 16S rRNA. The size the possible structure of the S8 protein binding site are discussed and compared with the binding of cyanogen bromide digestion products which bind to 16S rRNA.     

Unbalanced rRNA gene dosage and its effects on rRNA and ribosomal-protein synthesis.

The synthesis of rRNA was unbalanced by the introduction of plasmids containing rRNA operons with large internal deletions. Significant unbalanced synthesis was achieved only when the deletions affected both 16S and 23S RNA genes or when the deletions affected the 23S RNA gene alone. Although large imbalances in rRNA synthesis resulted from deletions affecting 16S and 23S RNA genes or only 23S RNA genes, excess 16S RNA and defective rRNA species were rapidly degraded. Large imbalances in the synthesis of regions of rRNA did not result in significantly unbalanced synthesis of ribosomal proteins. It therefore is probable that excess intact 16S RNA is degraded because ribosomal proteins are not available for packaging the RNA into ribosomes. Defective RNA species also may be degraded for this reason or because proper ribosome assembly is prevented by the defects in RNA structure. We propose two possible explanations for the finding that unbalanced overproduction of binding sites for feedback ribosomal protein does not result in significant unbalanced translational feedback depression of ribosomal protein mRNAs.     

Identification of a functional core in the RNA component of RNase MRP of budding yeasts

RNase MRP is an endonuclease participating in ribosomal RNA processing. It consists of one RNA and at least nine protein subunits. Using oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis, we analyzed the functional role of five of the hairpins in the secondary structure of the RNA subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase MRP. Deletion of an entire hairpin was either lethal or resulted in very poor growth. However, peripheral portions constituting up to 70% of a hairpin could be deleted without effects on cell growth rate or processing of rRNA. To determine whether these hairpins perform redundant functions, we analyzed mutants combining four or five benign hairpin deletions. Simultaneous removal of four of these hairpin segments had no detectable effect. Removing five created a temperature- and cold-sensitive enzyme, but these deficiencies could be partially overcome by a mutation in one of the RNase MRP protein subunits, or by increasing the copy number of several of the protein subunit genes. These observations suggest that the peripheral elements of the RNA hairpins contain no structures or sequences required for substrate recognition, catalysis or binding of protein subunits. Thus, the functionally essential elements of the RNase MRP RNA appear to be concentrated in the core of the subunit.     

Ribosomal protein L1 recognizes the same specific structural motif in its target sites on the autoregulatory mRNA and 23S rRNA

The RNA-binding ability of ribosomal protein L1 is of profound interest since the protein has a dual function as a ribosomal protein binding rRNA and as a translational repressor binding its mRNA. Here, we report the crystal structure of ribosomal protein L1 in complex with a specific fragment of its mRNA and compare it with the structure of L1 in complex with a specific fragment of 23S rRNA determined earlier. In both complexes, a strongly conserved RNA structural motif is involved in L1 binding through a conserved network of RNA–protein H-bonds inaccessible to the solvent. These interactions should be responsible for specific recognition between the protein and RNA. A large number of additional non-conserved RNA–protein H-bonds stabilizes both complexes. The added contribution of these non-conserved H-bonds makes the ribosomal complex much more stable than the regulatory one.     

Role of N-terminal helix in interaction of ribosomal protein S15 with 16S rRNA

The position and conformation of the N-terminal helix of free ribosomal protein S15 was earlier found to be modified under various conditions. This variability was supposed to provide the recognition by the protein of its specific site on 16S rRNA. To test this hypothesis, we substituted some amino acid residues in this helix and assessed effects of these substitutions on the affinity of the protein for 16S rRNA. The crystal structure of the complex of one of these mutants (Thr3Cys S15) with the 16S rRNA fragment was determined, and a computer model of the complex containing another mutant (Gln8Met S15) was designed. The available and new information was analyzed in detail, and the N-terminal helix was concluded to play no significant role in the specific binding of the S15 protein to its target on 16S rRNA.     

A cyanogen bromide fragment of S4 that specifically rebinds 16S RNA.

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S4 was subjected to cyanogen bromide cleavage and was found to generate a complete cleavage product capable of rebinding 16S rRNA. This fragment, consisting of residues 1-103, was found to bind with an apparent association constant of 11 microM-1. This fragment was used in place of S4 in an in vitro reconstitution experiment. Although the particles formed had a protein composition not significantly different from reconstituted 30S ribosomal subunits, their sedimentation behavior was more like that of particles reconstituted without S4. These results indicate to us that, although residues 104-203 of S4 are involved in the assembly of the 30S ribosome, they are not necessary for the binding of S4 to 16S RNA. Taken with previous results, the domain of S4 involved in specific binding of 16S RNA can be confined to residues 47-103.     

Do mRNA and rRNA binding sites of E.coli ribosomal protein S15 share common structural determinants?

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15 recognizes two RNA targets: a three-way junction in 16S rRNA and a pseudoknot structure on its own mRNA. Binding to mRNA occurs when S15 is expressed in excess over its rRNA target, resulting in an inhibition of translation start. The sole apparent similarity between the rRNA and mRNA targets is the presence of a G-U/G-C motif that contributes only modestly to rRNA binding but is essential for mRNA. To get more information on the structural determinants used by S15 to bind its mRNA target as compared to its rRNA site, we used site-directed mutagenesis, substitution by nucleotide analogs, footprinting experiments on both RNA and protein, and graphic modeling. The size of the mRNA-binding site could be reduced to 45 nucleotides, without loss of affinity. This short RNA preferentially folds into a pseudoknot, the formation of which depends on magnesium concentration and temperature. The size of the loop L2 that bridges the two stems of the pseudoknot through the minor groove could not be reduced below nine nucleotides. Then we showed that the pseudoknot recognizes the same side of S15 as 16S rRNA, although shielding a smaller surface area. It turned out that the G-U/G-C motif is recognized from the minor groove in both cases, and that the G-C pair is recognized in a very similar manner. However, the wobble G-U pair of the mRNA is not directly contacted by S15, as in rRNA, but is most likely involved in building a precise conformation of the RNA, essential for binding. Otherwise, unique specific features are utilized, such as the three-way junction in the case of 16S rRNA and the looped out A(-46) for the mRNA pseudoknot.     

Interaction of the Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein S15 with its 5'-translational operator mRNA

The Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein S15 (BS15) binds both a three-helix junction in the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA and its cognate mRNA. Native gel mobility-shift assays show that BS15 interacts specifically and with high affinity to the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of this cognate mRNA with an apparent dissociation constant of 3(+/-0.3) nM. In order to localize the structural elements that are essential for BS15 recognition, a series of deletion mutants of the full cognate mRNA were prepared and tested in the same gel-shift assay. The minimal binding site for BS15 is a 50 nucleotide RNA showing a close secondary structure resemblance to the BS15 binding region from 16 S rRNA. There are two major structural motifs that must be maintained for high-affinity binding. The first being a purine-rich three-helix junction, and the second being an internal loop. The sequence identity of the internal loops differs greatly between the BS15 mRNA and rRNA sites, and this difference is correlated to discrimination between wild-type BS15 and a BS15(H45R) mutant. The association and dissociation kinetics measured for the 5'-UTR-BS15 interaction are quite slow, but are typical for a ribosomal protein-RNA interaction. The BS15 mRNA and 16 S rRNA binding sites share a common secondary structure yet have little sequence identity. The mRNA and rRNA may in fact present similar if not identical structural elements that confer BS15 recognition.     

The RNA binding site of S8 ribosomal protein of Escherichia coli: Selex and hydroxyl radical probing studies.

The RNA binding site of ribosomal protein S8 of Escherichia coli is confined to a small region within the stem of a hairpin in 16S rRNA (nt 588-605/633-651), and thus represents a model system for understanding RNA/protein interaction rules. The S8 binding site on 16S rRNA was suspected to contain noncanonical features difficult to prove with classical genetical or biochemical means. We performed in vitro iterative selection of RNA aptamers that bind S8. For the different aptamers, the interactions with the protein were probed with hydroxyl radicals. Aptamers that were recognized according to the same structural rules as wild-type RNA, but with variations not found in nature, were identified. These aptamers revealed features in the S8 binding site that had been concealed during previous characterizations by the high base conservation throughout evolution. Our data demonstrate that the core structure of the S8 binding site is composed of three interdependent bases (nt 597/641/643), with an essential intervening adenine nucleotide (position 642). The other elements important for the binding site are a base pair (598/640) above the three interdependent bases and a bulged base at position 595, the identity of which is not important. Possible implications on the geometry of the S8 binding site are discussed with the help of a three-dimensional model.     

The participation of 5S rRNA in the co-translational formation of a eukaryotic 5S ribonucleoprotein complex

The eukaryotic ribosomal 5S RNA–protein complex (5S rRNP) is formed by a co-translational event that requires 5S rRNA binding to the nascent peptide chain of eukaryotic ribosomal protein L5. Binding between 5S rRNA and the nascent chain is specific: neither the 5S rRNA nor the nascent chain of L5 protein can be substituted by other RNAs or other ribosomal proteins. The region responsible for binding 5S rRNA is located at positions 35–50 with amino acid sequence RLVIQDIKNKYNTPKYRM. Eukaryotic 5S rRNA binds a nascent chain having this sequence, but such binding is not substantive enough to form a 5S-associated RNP complex, suggesting that 5S rRNA binding to the nascent chain is amino acid sequence dependent and that formation of the 5S rRNP complex is L5 protein specific. Microinjection of 5S rRNP complex into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes results in both an increase in the initial rate and also in the extent of net nuclear import of L5. This suggests that the 5S rRNP complex enhances nuclear transport of L5. We propose that 5S rRNA plays a chaperone-like role in folding of the nascent chain of L5 and directs L5 into a 5S rRNP complex for nuclear entry.