Clustered DNA lesion repair in eukaryotes: relevance to mutagenesis and cell survival

A clustered DNA lesion, also known as a multiply damaged site, is defined as ≥ 2 damages in the DNA within 1-2 helical turns. Only ionizing radiation and certain chemicals introduce DNA damage in the genome in this non-random way. What is now clear is that the lethality of a damaging agent is not just related to the types of DNA lesions introduced, but also to how the damage is distributed in the DNA. Clustered DNA lesions were first hypothesized to exist in the 1990s, and work has progressed where these complex lesions have been characterized and measured in irradiated as well as in non-irradiated cells. A clustered lesion can consist of single as well as double strand breaks, base damage and abasic sites, and the damages can be situated on the same strand or opposing strands. They include tandem lesions, double strand break (DSB) clusters and non-DSB clusters, and base excision repair as well as the DSB repair pathways can be required to remove these complex lesions. Due to the plethora of oxidative damage induced by ionizing radiation, and the repair proteins involved in their removal from the DNA, it has been necessary to study how repair systems handle these lesions using synthetic DNA damage. This review focuses on the repair process and mutagenic consequences of clustered lesions in yeast and mammalian cells. By examining the studies on synthetic clustered lesions, and the effects of low vs high LET radiation on mammalian cells or tissues, it is possible to extrapolate the potential biological relevance of these clustered lesions to the killing of tumor cells by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and to the risk of cancer in non-tumor cells, and this will be discussed.     

RNA-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious DNA lesions, which if unrepaired or repaired incorrectly can cause cell death or genome instability that may lead to cancer. To counteract these adverse consequences, eukaryotes have evolved a highly orchestrated mechanism to repair DSBs, namely DNA-damage-response (DDR). DDR, as defined specifically in relation to DSBs, consists of multi-layered regulatory modes including DNA damage sensors, transducers and effectors, through which DSBs are sensed and then repaired via DNAprotein interactions. Unexpectedly, recent studies have revealed a direct role of RNA in the repair of DSBs, including DSB-induced small RNA (diRNA)-directed and RNA-templated DNA repair. Here, we summarize the recent discoveries of RNA-mediated regulation of DSB repair and discuss the potential impact of these novel RNA components of the DSB repair pathway on genomic stability and plasticity.     

Repair of oxidative DNA damage in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, and some changes with aging in mammalian cells

Exposure to exogenous and endogenous sources cause oxidative damage to cellular macromolecules, including DNA. This results in gradual accumulation of oxidative DNA base lesions, and in order to maintain genomic stability we must have effective systems to repair this kind of damage. The accumulation of lesions is most dramatic in the mitochondrial DNA, and this may cause dysfunction and loss of cellular energy production. Base excision DNA repair (BER) is the major pathway that removes oxidative DNA base lesions, and while we know much about its mechanism in the nuclear DNA, little is yet known about this pathway in mitochondria. While nuclear BER decreases with age, the mitochondrial DNA repair may increase with age. This increase is not enough to prevent the gradual accumulation of lesions in the mitochondrial DNA with age. Accumulation of DNA lesions with age may be the underlying cause for age-associated diseases including cancer.     

Bisphenol A Promotes Cell Survival Following Oxidative DNA Damage in Mouse Fibroblasts

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a biologically active industrial chemical used in production of consumer products. BPA has become a target of intense public scrutiny following concerns about its association with human diseases such as obesity, diabetes, reproductive disorders, and cancer. Recent studies link BPA with the generation of reactive oxygen species, and base excision repair (BER) is responsible for removing oxidatively induced DNA lesions. Yet, the relationship between BPA and BER has yet to be examined. Further, the ubiquitous nature of BPA allows continuous exposure of the human genome concurrent with the normal endogenous and exogenous insults to the genome, and this co-exposure may impact the DNA damage response and repair. To determine the effect of BPA exposure on base excision repair of oxidatively induced DNA damage, cells compromised in double-strand break repair were treated with BPA alone or co-exposed with either potassium bromate (KBrO₃) or laser irradiation as oxidative damaging agents. In experiments with KBrO₃, co-treatment with BPA partially reversed the KBrO₃-induced cytotoxicity observed in these cells, and this was coincident with an increase in guanine base lesions in genomic DNA. The improvement in cell survival and the increase in oxidatively induced DNA base lesions were reminiscent of previous results with alkyl adenine DNA glycosylase-deficient cells, suggesting that BPA may prevent initiation of repair of oxidized base lesions. With laser irradiation-induced DNA damage, treatment with BPA suppressed DNA repair as revealed by several indicators. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that BPA can induce a suppression of oxidized base lesion DNA repair by the base excision repair pathway.     

Progress in the analysis of urinary oxidative DNA damage

Oxidative DNA damage has been implicated to be important in the pathogenesis of many diseases, including cancer and heart disease. The assessment of damage in various biological matrices, such as DNA, serum, and urine, is vital to understanding this role and subsequently devising intervention strategies. Despite the numerous techniques to measure oxidative DNA damage products in urine, it remains unclear what these measurements truly represent. Sources of urinary lesions may include the diet, cell death, and, of most interest, DNA repair. Were it possible to exclude the two former contributions, a noninvasive assay for DNA repair would be invaluable in the study of DNA damage and disease. This review highlights that, although progress has been made, significant work remains. Diet, cell death, and repair need continued examination to further elucidate the kinetics of lesion formation and clearance in vivo. Studies from our laboratory and others are making appreciable progress towards the interpretation of urinary lesion measurements along with the development of urinary assays to evaluate DNA repair. Upon establishment of these details, urinary oxidative DNA damage measurements may become more than a reflection of generalized oxidative stress.     

DNA-protein crosslinks: their induction, repair, and biological consequences

The covalent crosslinking of proteins to DNA presents a major physical challenge to the DNA metabolic machinery. DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) are induced by a variety of endogenous and exogenous agents (including, paradoxically, agents that are known to cause cancer as well as agents that are used to treat cancer), and yet they have not received as much attention as other types of DNA damage. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge of DPCs in terms of their induction, structures, biological consequences and possible mechanisms of repair. DPCs can be formed through several different chemistries, which is likely to affect the stability and repair of these lesions, as well as their biological consequences. The considerable discrepancy in the DPC literature reflects both the varying chemistries of this heterogeneous group of lesions and the fact that a number of different methods have been used for their analysis. In particular, research in this area has long been hampered by the inability to chemically define these lesions in intact cells and tissues. However, the emergence of proteomics as a tool for identifying specific proteins that become crosslinked to DNA has heralded a new era in our ability to study these lesions. Although there are still many unanswered questions, the identification of specific proteins crosslinked to DNA should facilitate our understanding of the down-stream effects of these lesions.     

Oxidative DNA damage processing in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA

Living organisms are constantly exposed to oxidative stress from environmental agents and from endogenous metabolic processes. The resulting oxidative modifications occur in proteins, lipids and DNA. Since proteins and lipids are readily degraded and resynthesized, the most significant consequence of the oxidative stress is thought to be the DNA modifications, which can become permanent via the formation of mutations and other types of genomic instability. Many different DNA base changes have been seen following some form of oxidative stress, and these lesions are widely considered as instigators for the development of cancer and are also implicated in the process of aging. Several studies have documented that oxidative DNA lesions accumulate with aging, and it appears that the major site of this accumulation is mitochondrial DNA rather than nuclear DNA. The DNA repair mechanisms involved in the removal of oxidative DNA lesions are much more complex than previously considered. They involve base excision repair (BER) pathways and nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways, and there is currently a great deal of interest in clarification of the pathways and their interactions. We have used a number of different approaches to explore the mechanism of the repair processes, to examine the repair of different types of oxidative lesions and to measure different steps of the repair processes. Furthermore, we can measure the DNA damage processing in the nuclear DNA and separately, in the mitochondrial DNA. Contrary to widely held notions, mitochondria have efficient DNA repair of oxidative DNA damage.     

A Genomic Screen Revealing the Importance of Vesicular Trafficking Pathways in Genome Maintenance and Protection against Genotoxic Stress in Diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells

The ability to survive stressful conditions is important for every living cell. Certain stresses not only affect the current well-being of cells but may also have far-reaching consequences. Uncurbed oxidative stress can cause DNA damage and decrease cell survival and/or increase mutation rates, and certain substances that generate oxidative damage in the cell mainly act on DNA. Radiomimetic zeocin causes oxidative damage in DNA, predominantly by inducing single- or double-strand breaks. Such lesions can lead to chromosomal rearrangements, especially in diploid cells, in which the two sets of chromosomes facilitate excessive and deleterious recombination. In a global screen for zeocin-oversensitive mutants, we selected 133 genes whose deletion reduces the survival of zeocin-treated diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. The screen revealed numerous genes associated with stress responses, DNA repair genes, cell cycle progression genes, and chromatin remodeling genes. Notably, the screen also demonstrated the involvement of the vesicular trafficking system in cellular protection against DNA damage. The analyses indicated the importance of vesicular system integrity in various pathways of cellular protection from zeocin-dependent damage, including detoxification and a direct or transitional role in genome maintenance processes that remains unclear. The data showed that deleting genes involved in vesicular trafficking may lead to Rad52 focus accumulation and changes in total DNA content or even cell ploidy alterations, and such deletions may preclude proper DNA repair after zeocin treatment. We postulate that functional vesicular transport is crucial for sustaining an integral genome. We believe that the identification of numerous new genes implicated in genome restoration after genotoxic oxidative stress combined with the detected link between vesicular trafficking and genome integrity will reveal novel molecular processes involved in genome stability in diploid cells.     

DNA Damage Response as an Anti-Cancer Barrier: Damage Threshold and the Concept of 'Conditional Haploinsufficiency'

DNA damage response (DDR) emerges as a biological tumorigenesis barrier in early stages of cancer development, and a selective pressure that favors outgrowth of malignant clones with defects in the genome maintenance machinery, such as mutations of p53 and other DDR components. Recent studies indicate that the DDR barrier is not alarmed universally among early noninvasive lesions, but rather responds to high-risk tumorigenic threats that occur in high-grade, pre-malignant lesions that are generally more likely to develop into bona fide malignancies. In addition, while the DDR barrier appears to operate in major types of cancer, such as carcinomas of the lung, breast and colon, DDR activation is rare at any stage of progression among testicular germ-cell tumors. Together with observations that several, but not all oncogenic insults are capable of activating the DDR machinery, these new results point to existence of a critical threshold of such oncogene-induced DNA damage. It seems that only cells and lesions that experience DNA replication stress and DNA damage above such threshold activate the cellular senescence or cell death pathways within the DDR machinery. The higher load of DNA damage may also contribute to cancer predisposition in families with inherited heterozygous defects in the DDR barrier, such as in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, p53 and other genes. We propose that carriers of such DDR defects may be more prone to malignancy due to ‘conditional haploinsufficiency’: such partial defects may be asymptomatic in normal tissues, yet they may become manifest under conditions of supra-threshold endogenous DNA damage in oncogene-driven pre-malignant lesions.     

Protein oxidation,UVA and human DNA repair

Solar UVB is carcinogenic. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) counteracts the carcinogenicity of UVB by excising potentially mutagenic UVB-induced DNA lesions. Despite this capacity for DNA repair, non-melanoma skin cancers and apparently normal sun-exposed skin contain huge numbers of mutations that are mostly attributable to unrepaired UVB-induced DNA lesions. UVA is about 20-times more abundant than UVB in incident sunlight. It does cause some DNA damage but this does not fully account for its biological impact. The effects of solar UVA are mediated by its interactions with cellular photosensitizers that generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induce oxidative stress. The proteome is a significant target for damage by UVA-induced ROS. In cultured human cells, UVA-induced oxidation of DNA repair proteins inhibits DNA repair. This article addresses the possible role of oxidative stress and protein oxidation in determining DNA repair efficiency – with particular reference to NER and skin cancer risk.     

Detection of complex DNA damage in gamma-irradiated acute lymphoblastic leukemia Pre-b NALM-6 cells

Bistranded complex DNA damage, i.e., double-strand breaks (DSBs) and non-DSB oxidative clustered DNA lesions, is hypothesized to challenge the repair mechanisms of the cell and consequently the genomic integrity. The oxidative clustered DNA lesions may be persistent and may accumulate in human cancer cells for long times after irradiation. To evaluate the detection and possible accumulation of oxidative clustered DNA lesions in leukemia cells exposed to doses equivalent to those used in radiotherapy, we measured the induction of DSBs and three different types of oxidative clustered DNA lesions in NALM-6 cells, a human acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) pre-B cell line, after exposure to (137)Cs gamma rays. For the detection and measurement of DSBs and oxidative clustered DNA lesions, we used an adaptation of the neutral comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis) using E. coli repair enzymes (Endo IV, Fpg and Endo III) as enzymatic probes. We found a linear dose response for the induction of DSBs and oxidative clustered DNA lesions. Clustered DNA lesions were more prevalent than prompt DSBs. For each DSB induced by radiation, approximately 2.5 oxidative clustered DNA lesions were detected. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the detection and linear induction of oxidative clustered DNA lesions with radiation dose in an ALL cell line. These results point to the biological significance of clustered DNA lesions.