Modules, multidomain proteins and organismic complexity

Originally the term 'protein module' was coined to distinguish mobile domains that frequently occur as building blocks of diverse multidomain proteins from 'static' domains that usually exist only as stand-alone units of single-domain proteins. Despite the widespread use of the term 'mobile domain', the distinction between static and mobile domains is rather vague as it is not easy to quantify the mobility of domains. In the present work we show that the most appropriate measure of the mobility of domains is the number of types of local environments in which a given domain is present. Ranking of domains with respect to this parameter in different evolutionary lineages highlighted marked differences in the propensity of domains to form multidomain proteins. Our analyses have also shown that there is a correlation between domain size and domain mobility: smaller domains are more likely to be used in the construction of multidomain proteins, whereas larger domains are more likely to be static, stand-alone domains. It is also shown that shuffling of a limited set of modules was facilitated by intronic recombination in the metazoan lineage and this has contributed significantly to the emergence of novel complex multidomain proteins, novel functions and increased organismic complexity of metazoa.     

Promiscuous domains: facilitating stability of the yeast protein-protein interaction network

Domain-domain interactions are a critical type of the mechanisms mediating protein-protein interactions (PPIs). For a given protein domain, its ability to combine with distinct domains is usually referred to as promiscuity or versatility. Interestingly, a previous study has reported that a domain's promiscuity may reflect its ability to interact with other domains in human proteins. In this work, promiscuous domains were first identified from the yeast genome. Then, we sought to determine what roles promiscuous domains might play in the PPI network. Mapping the promiscuous domains onto the proteins in this network revealed that, consistent with the previous knowledge, the hub proteins were significantly enriched with promiscuous domains. We also found that the set of hub proteins were not the same set as those proteins with promiscuous domains, although there was some overlap. Analysis of the topological properties of this yeast PPI network showed that the characteristic path length of the network increased significantly after deleting proteins with promiscuous domains. This indicated that communication between two proteins was longer and the network stability decreased. These observations suggested that, as the hub proteins, proteins with promiscuous domains might play a role in maintaining network stability. In addition, functional analysis revealed that proteins with promiscuous domains mainly participated in the "Folding, Sorting, and Degradation" and "Replication and Repair" biological pathways, and that they significantly execute key molecular functions, such as "nucleoside-triphosphatase activity (GO:0017111)."     

Domains in proteins and proteoglycans of the extracellular matrix with functions in assembly and cellular activities

Most proteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM), such as the glycoproteins, collagens and proteoglycans, consist of many structurally autonomous domains that are often functionally distinct. Consequently these proteins are designated as mosaic proteins. Related domains are often found in several different ECM proteins. Domains which are of importance for assembly have been identified by fragmentation and other approaches. Triple-stranded coiled-coil domains in laminin and probably also in tenascin and thrombospondin are responsible for chain selection, a process which may be important for the formation of tissue specific isoforms. Globular domains at the C-terminus of collagenous domains are essential for the registration of the three chains and triple-helix formation. Fibrillar assemblies of these triple helices with constituent globular domains serve important assembly functions in many collagens including collagens IV and VI. Many other domains with more specialized functions in assembly have been identified in laminin, fibronectin and other ECM proteins. Cys-rich domains with either distant or close homology with epidermal growth factor are repeated manifold in rod-like regions of a number of ECM proteins including laminin, tenascin and thrombospondin. They may serve as spacer elements but as suggested for laminin some domains of this type may also function as signals for cellular growth and differentiation. Another important cellular function common to many ECM proteins is cell attachment. Several cell attachment sites have been localized in structurally unrelated domains of the same or of different ECM proteins.     

Ubiquitin‐like domains can target to the proteasome but proteolysis requires a disordered region

Ubiquitin and some of its homologues target proteins to the proteasome for degradation. Other ubiquitin‐like domains are involved in cellular processes unrelated to the proteasome, and proteins containing these domains remain stable in the cell. We find that the 10 yeast ubiquitin‐like domains tested bind to the proteasome, and that all 11 identified domains can target proteins for degradation. Their apparent proteasome affinities are not directly related to their stabilities or functions. That is, ubiquitin‐like domains in proteins not part of the ubiquitin proteasome system may bind the proteasome more tightly than domains in proteins that are bona fide components. We propose that proteins with ubiquitin‐like domains have properties other than proteasome binding that confer stability. We show that one of these properties is the absence of accessible disordered regions that allow the proteasome to initiate degradation. In support of this model, we find that Mdy2 is degraded in yeast when a disordered region in the protein becomes exposed and that the attachment of a disordered region to Ubp6 leads to its degradation.     

Misfolded proteins are sorted by a sequential checkpoint mechanism of ER quality control

Misfolded proteins retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are degraded by the ER-associated degradation pathway. The mechanisms used to sort them from correctly folded proteins remain unclear. Analysis of substrates with defined folded and misfolded domains has revealed a system of sequential checkpoints that recognize topologically distinct domains of polypeptides. The first checkpoint examines the cytoplasmic domains of membrane proteins. If a lesion is detected, it is retained statically in the ER and rapidly degraded without regard to the state of its other domains. Proteins passing this test face a second checkpoint that monitors domains localized in the ER lumen. Proteins detected by this pathway are sorted from folded proteins and degraded by a quality control mechanism that requires ER-to-Golgi transport. Although the first checkpoint is obligatorily directed at membrane proteins, the second monitors both soluble and membrane proteins. Our data support a model whereby "properly folded" proteins are defined biologically as survivors that endure a series of distinct checkpoints.     

0j.py: a software tool for low complexity proteins and protein domains

Low complexity proteins and protein domains have sequences which appear highly non-random. Over the years, these sequences have been routinely filtered out during sequence similarity searches because interest has been focused on globular proteins, and inclusion of these domains can severely skew search results. However, early work on these proteins and more recent studies of the related area of repeated protein sequences suggests that low complexity protein domains have function and therefore are in need of further investigation. 0j.py is a new tool for demarcating low complexity protein domains more accurately than has been possible to date. The paper describes 0j.py and its use in revealing proteins with repeated and poly-amino-acid peptides. Statistical methods are then employed to to examine the distribution of these proteins across species, while keyword clustering is used to suggest roles performed by proteins through the use of low complexity domains.     

The predicted secretomes of Monosiga brevicollis and Capsaspora owczarzaki,close unicellular relatives of metazoans,reveal new insights into the evolution of the metazoan extracellular matrix

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a major mediator of multi-cellularity in the metazoa. Multiple ECM proteins are conserved from sponges to human, raising questions about the evolutionary origin of ECM. Choanoflagellates are the closest unicellular relatives of the metazoa and proteins with domains characteristic of metazoan ECM proteins have been identified from the genome-predicted proteome of the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis. However, a systematic analysis of M. brevicollis secretory signal peptide-containing proteins with ECM domains has been lacking. We analysed all predicted secretory signal-peptide-containing proteins of M. brevicollis for ECM domains. Nine domains that are widespread in metazoan ECM proteins are represented, with EGF, fibronectin III, laminin G, and von Willebrand Factor_A domains being the most numerous. Three proteins contain more than one category of ECM domain, however, no proteins correspond to the domain architecture of metazoan ECM proteins. The fibronectin III domains are all present within glycoside hydrolases and none contain an integrin-binding motif. Glycosaminoglycan-binding motifs identified in animal thrombospondin type 1 domains are conserved in some M. brevicollis representatives of this domain, whereas there is little evidence of conservation of glycosaminoglycan-binding motifs in the laminin G domains. The identified proteins were compared with the predicted secretory ECM domain-containing proteins of the integrin-expressing filasterean, Capsaspora owczarzaki. C. owczarzaki encodes a smaller number of secretory, ECM domain-containing proteins and only EGF, fibronectin type III and laminin G domains are represented. The M. brevicollis and C. owczarzaki proteins have distinct domain architectures and all proteins differ in their domain architecture to metazoan ECM proteins. These identifications provide a basis for future experiments to validate the extracellular location of these proteins and uncover their functions in choanoflagellates and C. owczarzaki. The data strengthen the model that ECM proteins are metazoan-specific and evolved as innovations in the last common metazoan ancestor.     

Cholesterol and the interaction of proteins with membrane domains

Cholesterol is not uniformly distributed in biological membranes. One of the factors influencing the formation of cholesterol-rich domains in membranes is the unequal lateral distribution of proteins in membranes. Certain proteins are found in cholesterol-rich domains. In some of these cases, it is as a consequence of the proteins interacting directly with cholesterol. There are several structural features of a protein that result in the protein preferentially associating with cholesterol-rich domains. One of the best documented of these is certain types of lipidations. In addition, however, there are segments of a protein that can preferentially sequester cholesterol. We discuss two examples of these cholesterol-recognition elements: the cholesterol recognition/interaction amino acid consensus (CRAC) domain and the sterol-sensing domain (SSD). The requirements for a CRAC motif are quite flexible and predict that a large number of sequences could recognize cholesterol. There are, however, certain proteins that are known to interact with cholesterol-rich domains of cell membranes that have CRAC motifs, and synthetic peptides corresponding to these segments also promote the formation of cholesterol-rich domains. Modeling studies have provided a rationale for certain requirements of the CRAC motif. The SSD is a larger protein segment comprising five transmembrane domains. The amino acid sequence YIYF is found in several SSD and in certain other proteins for which there is evidence that they interact with cholesterol-rich domains. The CRAC sequences as well as YIYF are generally found adjacent to a transmembrane helical segment. These regions appear to have a strong influence of the localization of certain proteins into domains in biological membranes. In addition to the SSD, there is also a domain found in soluble proteins, the START domain, that binds lipids. Certain proteins with START domains specifically bind cholesterol and are believed to function in intracellular cholesterol transport. One of these proteins is StAR-D1, that also has a mitochondrial targeting sequence and plays an important role in delivering cholesterol to the mitochondria of steroidogenic cells.     

N-terminal domains of putative helicases of flavi- and pestiviruses may be serine proteases.

Recently we tentatively identified, by sequence comparison, central domains of the NS3 proteins of flaviviruses and the respective portion of the pestivirus polyprotein as RNA helicases (A.E.G. et al., submitted). Alignment of the N-proximal domains of the same proteins revealed conservation of short sequence stretches resembling those around the catalytic Ser, His and Asp residues of chymotrypsin-like proteases. A statistically significant similarity has been detected between the sequences of these domains and those of the C-terminal serine protease domains of alphavirus capsid proteins. It is suggested that flavivirus NS3 and the respective pestivirus protein contain at least two functional domains, the N-proximal protease and the C-proximal helicase one. The protease domain is probably involved in the processing of viral non-structural proteins.     

The folding and evolution of multidomain proteins

Analyses of genomes show that more than 70% of eukaryotic proteins are composed of multiple domains. However, most studies of protein folding focus on individual domains and do not consider how interactions between domains might affect folding. Here, we address this by analysing the three-dimensional structures of multidomain proteins that have been characterized experimentally and observe that where the interface is small and loosely packed, or unstructured, the folding of the domains is independent. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that multidomain proteins have evolved mechanisms to minimize the problems of interdomain misfolding.     

Molecular evolution of PAS domain-containing proteins of filamentous cyanobacteria through domain shuffling and domain duplication.

When the entire genome of a filamentous heterocyst-forming N2-fixing cyanobacterium, Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 (Anabaena) was determined in 2001, a large number of PAS domains were detected in signal-transducing proteins. The draft genome sequence is also available for the cyanobacterium, Nostoc punctiforme strain ATCC 29133 (Nostoc), that is closely related to Anabaena. In this study, we extracted all PAS domains from the Nostoc genome sequence and analyzed them together with those of Anabaena. Clustering analysis of all the PAS domains gave many specific pairings, indicative of evolutionary conservations. Ortholog analysis of PAS-containing proteins showed composite multidomain architecture in some cases of conserved domains and domains of disagreement between the two species. Further inspection of the domains of disagreement allowed us to trace them back in evolution. Thus, multidomain proteins could have been generated by duplication or shuffling in these cyanobacteria. The conserved PAS domains in the orthologous proteins were analyzed by structural fitting to the known PAS domains. We detected several subclasses with unique sequence features, which will be the target of experimental analysis.     

Do proteins facilitate the formation of cholesterol-rich domains?

Both biological and model membranes can exhibit the formation of domains. A brief review of some of the diverse methodologies used to identify the presence of domains in membranes is given. Some of these domains are enriched in cholesterol. The segregation of lipids into cholesterol-rich domains can occur in both pure lipid systems as well as membranes containing peptides and proteins. Peptides and proteins can promote the formation of cholesterol-rich domains not only by preferentially interacting with cholesterol and being sequestered into these regions of the membrane, but also indirectly as a consequence of being excluded from cholesterol-rich domains. The redistribution of components is dictated by the thermodynamics of the system. The formation of domains in a biological membrane is a consequence of all of the intermolecular interactions including those among lipid molecules as well as between lipids and proteins.     

The cysteine-rich domain of snake venom metalloproteinases is a ligand for von Willebrand factor A domains: role in substrate targeting

Snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs) are members of the Reprolysin family of metalloproteinases to which the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) proteins also belong. The disintegrin-like/cysteine-rich domains of the ADAMs have been implicated in their function. In the case of the SVMPs, we hypothesized that these domains could function to target the metalloproteinases to key extracellular matrix proteins or cell surface proteins. Initially we detected interaction of collagen XIV, a fibril-associated collagen with interrupted triple helices containing von Willebrand factor A (VWA) domains, with the PIII SVMP catrocollastatin. Next we investigated whether other VWA domain-containing matrix proteins could support the binding of PIII SVMPs. Using surface plasmon resonance, the PIII SVMP jararhagin and a recombinant cysteine-rich domain from a PIII SVMP were demonstrated to bind to collagen XIV, collagen XII, and matrilins 1, 3, and 4. Jararhagin was shown to cleave these proteins predominantly at sites localized at or near the VWA domains suggesting that it is the VWA domains to which the PIII SVMPs are binding via their cysteine-rich domain. In light of the fact that these extracellular matrix proteins function to stabilize matrix, targeting the SVMPs to these proteins followed by their specific cleavage could promote the destabilization of extracellular matrix and cell-matrix interactions and in the case of capillaries could contribute to their disruption and hemorrhage. Although there is only limited structural homology shared by the cysteine-rich domains of the PIII SVMPs and the ADAMs our results suggest an analogous function for the cysteine-rich domains in certain members of the expanded ADAM family of proteins to target them to VWA domain-containing proteins.     

Shuffled domains in extracellular proteins

A comprehensive list of domains in extracellular mosaic proteins is presented. About 40 domains were distinguished by consensus patterns. A subsequent sequence database search recognized these domains in more than 200 extracellular proteins. The results point to a structural network, which may also represent the molecular basis for a complex coordination of various functions within the world of extracellular proteins.     

真核生物中锌指蛋白的结构与功能

真核生物中的许多蛋白质分子包含锌指结构区,这类蛋白称为锌指蛋白.锌指蛋白因其包含特殊的指状结构,在对DNA、蛋白质和RNA的识别和结合中起重要作用.许多锌指蛋白的锌指结构域包含能与DNA特异结合的区域,并与某些效应结构域（如KRAB、SCAN、BTB/POZ、SNAG、SANT和PLAG等）相连,这类锌指蛋白常作为转录因子起作用,可调控靶基因的转录.一些锌指蛋白包含蛋白质识别结构域（如LIM锌指、MYND锌指、PHD锌指和RING锌指等）,它们能够特异地介导蛋白质之间的相互作用,因此被称作蛋白适配器.此外,某些锌指蛋白还可以结合RNA,起转录后调控作用.本文就锌指蛋白与DNA、RNA以及蛋白质分子间的相互作用作一综述.     

Interaction prediction and classification of PDZ domains

Background  

PDZ domain is a well-conserved, structural protein domain found in hundreds of signaling proteins that are otherwise unrelated. PDZ domains can bind to the C-terminal peptides of different proteins and act as glue, clustering different protein complexes together, targeting specific proteins and routing these proteins in signaling pathways. These domains are classified into classes I, II and III, depending on their binding partners and the nature of bonds formed. Binding specificities of PDZ domains are very crucial in order to understand the complexity of signaling pathways. It is still an open question how these domains recognize and bind their partners.     

Signs of Ancient and Modern Exon-Shuffling Are Correlated to the Distribution of Ancient and Modern Domains Along Proteins

Exon-shuffling is an important mechanism accounting for the origin of many new proteins in eukaryotes. However, its role in the creation of proteins in the ancestor of prokaryotes and eukaryotes is still debatable. Excess of symmetric exons is thought to represent evidence for exon-shuffling since the exchange of exons flanked by introns of the same phase does not disrupt the reading frame of the host gene. In this report, we found that there is a significant correlation between symmetric units of shuffling and the age of protein domains. Ancient domains, present in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, are more frequently bounded by phase 0 introns and their distribution is biased towards the central part of proteins. Modern domains are more frequently bounded by phase 1 introns and are present predominantly at the ends of proteins. We propose a model in which shuffling of ancient domains mainly flanked by phase 0 introns was important in the ancestor of eukaryotes and prokaryotes, during the creation of the central part of proteins. Shuffling of modern domains, predominantly flanked by phase 1 introns, accounted for the origin of the extremities of proteins during eukaryotic evolution.     

β-Strand-mediated interactions of protein domains

Protein domains exist by themselves or in combination with other domains to form complex multidomain proteins. Defining domain boundaries in proteins is essential for understanding their evolution and function but is not trivial. More specifically, partitioning domains that interact by forming a single β-sheet is known to be particularly troublesome for automatic structure-based domain decomposition pipelines. Here, we study edge-to-edge β-strand interactions between domains in a protein chain, to help define the boundaries for some more difficult cases where a single β-sheet spanning over two domains gives an appearance of one. We give a number of examples where β-strands belonging to a single β-sheet do not belong to a single domain and highlight the difficulties of automatic domain parsers on these examples. This work can be used as a baseline for defining domain boundaries in homologous proteins or proteins with similar domain interactions in the future.