Macromolecular mimicry in translation initiation: a model for the initiation factor IF2 on the ribosome

Protein biosynthesis in bacteria is controlled by a number of translation factors. Recent data based on comparison of sequence and structure data of translation factors have established a novel hypothesis for their interaction with the ribosome: initiation, elongation, and termination factors may use a common or partly overlapping binding site on the ribosome in a process of macromolecular mimicry of an A-site-bound tRNA. This paper reviews structural knowledge and tRNA macromolecular mimicry involvement of translation initiation factor IF2. Furthermore, a model is proposed for the factor and its interaction with the ribosome during the formation of the translation initiation complex.     

Functional diversity of the eukaryotic translation initiation factors belonging to eIF4 families

Protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells is fundamental for gene expression. This process involves the binding of an mRNA molecule to the small ribosomal subunit in a group of reactions catalyzed by eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIF) eIF4. To date, the role of each of the four eIF4, i.e. eIF4E, eIF4G, eIF4A and eIF4B, is well established. However, with the advent of genome-wide sequencing projects of various organisms, families of genes for each translation initiation factor have been identified. Intriguingly, recent studies have now established that certain eIF4 proteins can promote or inhibit translation of specific mRNAs, and also that some of them are active in processes other than translation. In addition, there is evidence of tissue- and developmental-stage-specific expression for some of these proteins. These new findings point to an additional level of complexity in the translation initiation process. In this review, we analyze the latest advances concerning the functionality of members of the eIF4 families in eukaryotic organisms and discuss the implications of this in the context of our current understanding of regulation of the translation initiation process.     

Facile characterization of translation initiation via nonsense codon suppression.

A new strategy for studying the mechanism of translation initiation in eukaryotes has been developed. The strategy involves the use of an in vitro translation system to incorporate a non-natural fluorescent amino acid into a protein from a suppressor tRNAPheCUA misacylated with that amino acid. It is thereby possible to monitor translation initiation efficiency at an AUG codon in different contexts; this is illustrated for three constructs encoding Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase mRNA with different translation initiation regions. Fluorescence measurements after in vitro translation of the mRNAs in rabbit reticulocyte lysate reflected differences in the position and efficiency of translation initiation and, therefore, can be used for characterization of the translation initiation process.     

Protein-protein interactions required during translation

Protein synthesis requires the involvement of numerous accessory factors that assist the ribosome in translation initiation, elongation, and termination. Extensive protein-protein and protein-RNA interactions are required to bring together the accessory factors, tRNAs, ribosomes, and mRNA into a productive complex and these interactions undergo dynamic alterations during each step of the translation initiation process. Initiation represents the most complex aspect of translation, requiring more accessory proteins, called initiation factors, than either elongation or termination. Not surprisingly, initiation is most often the rate-limiting step of translation and, as such, most (but not all) examples of translational regulation involve the regulation of protein-protein or protein-RNA interactions of the initiation complex. In this review, we focus on those interactions required for efficient translation initiation and how such interactions are regulated by developmental or environmental signals.     

Reconstitution of eukaryotic translation elongation in vitro following initiation by internal ribosomal entry

The ability to reconstitute different stages of eukaryotic translation process in vitro is a prerequisite for detailed biochemical analysis of their mechanisms. Reconstitution of elongation and subsequent processes such as termination and recycling on natural mRNAs translated by the cap-dependent mechanism is very complicated, and has not so far been done because of the necessity to first reconstitute the process of translation initiation, which is the most complex stage of eukaryotic translation, which requires at least nine initiation factors. The recent discovery of internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs) in the intergenic region (IGR) of the genomes of dicistroviruses such as cricket paralysis virus (CrPV) and Plautia stali intestine virus (PSIV) that mediate initiation of translation by a mechanism that does not involve aminoacylated initiator tRNA (Met-tRNA(i)Met) or any initiation factors has provided a simple means to assemble active ribosomes on an mRNA that can be used to investigate these downstream stages in the translation process. Here we describe the methods for the assembly of active mammalian ribosomes on the CrPV IGR IRES and for reconstitution and analysis of subsequent steps in the elongation process. The composition of the reconstituted in vitro translation system can be fully controlled, and we therefore suggest that the methods described here could in future be adapted to permit template-dependent synthesis of peptidomimetics by eukaryotic ribosomes, by reassigning individual codons in an mRNA to non-natural amino acids using tRNAs that have been appropriately mischarged either chemically or enzymatically.     

mRNA helicases: the tacticians of translational control

The translation initiation step in eukaryotes is highly regulated and rate-limiting. During this process, the 40S ribosomal subunit is usually recruited to the 5' terminus of the mRNA. It then migrates towards the initiation codon, where it is joined by the 60S ribosomal subunit to form the 80S initiation complex. Secondary structures in the 5' untranslated region (UTR) can impede binding and movement of the 40S ribosome. The canonical eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4A (also known as DDX2), together with its accessory proteins eIF4B and eIF4H, is thought to act as a helicase that unwinds secondary structures in the mRNA 5' UTR. Growing evidence suggests that other helicases are also important for translation initiation and may promote the scanning processivity of the 40S subunit, synergize with eIF4A to 'melt' secondary structures or facilitate translation of a subset of mRNAs.     

Roles of helicases in translation initiation: A mechanistic view

The goal of this review is to summarize our current knowledge about the helicases involved in translation initiation and their roles in both general and mRNA-specific translation. The main topics covered are the mechanisms of helicase action, with emphasis on the roles of accessory domains and proteins; the functions performed by helicases in translation initiation; and the interplay between direct and indirect effects of helicases that also function in steps preceding translation initiation. Special attention is given to the dynamics of eIF4A binding and dissociation from eIF4F during mRNA unwinding. It is proposed that DHX29, as well as other helicases and translation initiation factors could also cycle on and off the translation initiation complexes, similar to eIF4A. The evidence in favor of this hypothesis and its possible implications for the mechanisms of translation initiation is discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The biology of RNA helicases — Modulation for life.     

Signal transduction and regulation of translation initiation.

Regulation of the rate of protein synthesis is important in the control of cellular proliferation. Changes in the rate of protein translation are brought about primarily at the level of initiation, which is usually rate limiting. This regulation involves the reversible phosphorylation of key initiation factors. Translation initiation factors eIF-4F, eIF-4B, and ribosomal protein S6 are phosphorylated in response to a wide variety of mitogens, growth factors, and tyrosine kinase oncogenes. Thus, translation initiation factors are important components of signal transduction pathways activated by extracellular factors and oncogenes. Of particular interest is the messenger RNA 5' cap-binding protein, eIF-4E. Overexpression of eIF-4E in fibroblasts results in malignant transformation, suggesting that it is an important transducer of growth signals, and that aberrant expression of a translation factor can cause malignancy. Elucidation of the components of the signalling pathways which regulate initiation factor activity should increase our understanding of how extracellular factors and oncogenes effect cellular proliferation, and the role that translation plays in this process.     

Computational analysis of miRNA-mediated repression of translation: implications for models of translation initiation inhibition

The mechanism by which miRNAs inhibit translation has been under scrutiny both in vivo and in vitro. Divergent results have led to the suggestion that miRNAs repress translation by a variety of mechanisms including blocking the function of the cap in stimulating translation. However, these analyses largely only examine the final output of the multistep process of translation. This raises the possibility that when different steps in translation are rate limiting, miRNAs might show different effects on protein production. To examine this possibility, we modeled the process of translation initiation and examined how the effects of miRNAs under different conditions might be explained. Our results suggest that different effects of miRNAs on protein production in separate experiments could be due to differences in rate-limiting steps. This analysis does not rule out that miRNAs directly repress the function of the cap structure, but it demonstrates that the observations used to argue for this effect are open to alternative interpretations. Taking all the data together, our analysis is consistent with the model that miRNAs may primarily repress translation initiation at a late step.     

Translation initiation in eukaryotes: Versatility of the scanning model

It is generally accepted that the initiation of translation in eukaryotes involves the binding of the 40S ribosomal subunit to the capped 5′ end of an mRNA and subsequent scanning of 5′ UTR in search of an initiation codon. However, until recently this has remained a mere hypothesis. This review describes the novel experimental evidence in support of this classical model. Data on the participation of various factors in the eukaryotic initiation process are summarized. The sequence of initiation events is described in light of the latest experimental data. The existing physical models of scanning are presented. Special attention is paid to discussion of alternative models of eukaryotic initiation of translation. It is demonstrated that the canonical mechanism of initiation is more versatile than previously thought.     

Translation initiation by the c-myc mRNA internal ribosome entry sequence and the poly(A) tail

Eukaryotic mRNAs possess a poly(A) tail that enhances translation via the (7)mGpppN cap structure or internal ribosome entry sequences (IRESs). Here we address the question of how cellular IRESs recruit the ribosome and how recruitment is augmented by the poly(A) tail. We show that the poly(A) tail enhances 48S complex assembly by the c-myc IRES. Remarkably, this process is independent of the poly(A) binding protein (PABP). Purification of native 48S initiation complexes assembled on c-myc IRES mRNAs and quantitative label-free analysis by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry directly identify eIFs 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4GI, and 5 as components of the c-myc IRES 48S initiation complex. Our results demonstrate for the first time that the poly(A) tail augments the initiation step of cellular IRES-driven translation and implicate a distinct subset of translation initiation factors in this process. The mechanistic distinctions from cap-dependent translation may allow specific translational control of the c-myc mRNA and possibly other cellular mRNAs that initiate translation via IRESs.     

Translation acrobatics: how cancer cells exploit alternate modes of translational initiation

Recent work has brought to light many different mechanisms of translation initiation that function in cells in parallel to canonical cap‐dependent initiation. This has important implications for cancer. Canonical cap‐dependent translation initiation is inhibited by many stresses such as hypoxia, nutrient limitation, proteotoxic stress, or genotoxic stress. Since cancer cells are often exposed to these stresses, they rely on alternate modes of translation initiation for protein synthesis and cell growth. Cancer mutations are now being identified in components of the translation machinery and in cis‐regulatory elements of mRNAs, which both control translation of cancer‐relevant genes. In this review, we provide an overview on the various modes of non‐canonical translation initiation, such as leaky scanning, translation re‐initiation, ribosome shunting, IRES‐dependent translation, and m⁶A‐dependent translation, and then discuss the influence of stress on these different modes of translation. Finally, we present examples of how these modes of translation are dysregulated in cancer cells, allowing them to grow, to proliferate, and to survive, thereby highlighting the importance of translational control in cancer.     

Role of RNA Structure Motifs in IRES-Dependent Translation Initiation of the Coxsackievirus B3: New Insights for Developing Live-Attenuated Strains for Vaccines and Gene Therapy

Internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements are highly structured RNA sequences that function to recruit ribosomes for the initiation of translation. In contrast to the canonical cap-binding, the mechanism of IRES-mediated translation initiation is still poorly understood. Translation initiation of the coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), a causative agent of viral myocarditis, has been shown to be mediated by a highly ordered structure of the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR), which harbors an IRES. Taking into account that efficient initiation of mRNA translation depends on temporally and spatially orchestrated sequence of RNA–protein and RNA–RNA interactions, and that, at present, little is known about these interactions, we aimed to describe recent advances in our understanding of molecular structures and biochemical functions of the translation initiation process. Thus, this review will explore the IRES elements as important RNA structures and the significance of these structures in providing an alternative mechanism of translation initiation of the CVB3 RNA. Since translation initiation is the first intracellular step during the CVB3 infection cycle, the IRES region provides an ideal target for antiviral therapies. Interestingly, the 5′ and 3′UTRs represent promising candidates for the study of CVB3 cardiovirulence and provide new insights for developing live-attenuated vaccines.     

Competitive translation efficiency at the picornavirus type 1 internal ribosome entry site facilitated by viral cis and trans factors

Enteroviruses (EVs) overcome their host cells by usurping the translation machinery to benefit viral gene expression. This is accomplished through alternative translation initiation in a cap-independent manner at the viral internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). We have investigated the role of cis- and trans-acting viral factors in EV IRES translation in living cells. We observed that considerable portions of the viral genome, including the 5'-proximal open reading frame and the 3' untranslated region, contribute to stimulation of IRES-mediated translation. With the IRES in proper context, translation via internal initiation in uninfected cells is as efficient as at capped messages with short, unstructured 5' untranslated regions. IRES function is enhanced in cells infected with the EV coxsackievirus B3, but the related poliovirus has no significant stimulatory activity. This differential is due to the inherent properties of their 2A protease and is not coupled to 2A-mediated proteolytic degradation of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4G. Our results suggest that the efficiency of alternative translation initiation at EV IRESs depends on a properly configured template rather than on targeted alterations of the host cell translation machinery.     

Dependence of the adenovirus tripartite leader on the p220 subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 4F during in vitro translation. Effect of p220 cleavage by foot-and-mouth-disease-virus L-protease on in vitro translation.

The adenovirus tripartite leader (TPT) 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) allows translation in poliovirus-infected cells, in which the p220 subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 4F is degraded. This p220-independent translation was investigated by measuring in vitro translation in a reticulocyte lysate of a reporter gene, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, coupled to the TPT 5'UTR. The p220 subunit was degraded by translation of a foot-and-mouth-disease L-protease construct. Surprisingly, the TPT 5'UTR was dependent on intact p220, as are other naturally capped mRNA species. Translation of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA was p220 independent, as expected from its ability to support internal, cap-independent initiation. In vitro protein-synthesis experiments with purified initiation factors confirmed the dependence of TPT mRNA translation on eukaryotic initiation factor 4F. The relationship between adenovirus TPT-5'UTR-directed translation and poliovirus-induced host cell shut-off is discussed.     

Construction of regulatable picornavirus IRESes as a test of current models of the mechanism of internal translation initiation

Picornavirus internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) are approximately 450 nt. RNA elements that direct internal initiation of translation, such that when placed between the two cistrons of a dicistronic construct, they drive independent translation of the downstream cistron. Consequently they have been widely used for coordinated expression of two or more proteins. All picornavirus IRESs have an AUG triplet at the very 3' end, which is thought to be the actual site of internal ribosome entry. However with some IRESs, such as foot-and-mouth disease virus, and especially poliovirus, the majority of ribosomes do not initiate translation at this putative entry site AUG, but at the next AUG further downstream, which is thought to be accessed by a process of linear ribosome scanning from the entry site. If this is so, then it should be possible to regulate IRES-dependent translation by inserting an iron responsive element (IRE) between the putative entry site AUG and the main functional initiation site. This should make IRES-dependent translation sensitive to the concentration of iron regulatory protein (IRP), the protein that specifically binds to the IRE. This has been attempted with both the foot-and-mouth disease virus and poliovirus IRESs, and was successful in so far as an inhibition specifically of IRES-dependent translation was observed that was strictly dependent on both the presence of IRP and of a functional IRE motif inserted in the sense orientation. However, the range over which expression could be varied was rather limited (three- to fourfold maximum), because some IRES-dependent translation remained completely refractory to inhibition by even very high IRP concentrations. In contrast, with a cap-proximal IRE in the 5' untranslated region of an mRNA translated by the scanning mechanism, addition of sufficient IRP results in complete inhibition. These results support the model of IRES-promoted ribosome entry at an upstream site followed by strictly linear scanning to the main functional initiation site for the majority of internal initiation events, but imply that some ribosomes must access the functional initiation site by another route, possibly a nonlinear shunting-like mechanism.