Long range allosteric control of cytoplasmic dynein ATPase activity by the stalk and C-terminal domains

The dynein motor domain consists of a ring of six AAA domains with a protruding microtubule-binding stalk and a C-terminal domain of unknown function. To understand how conformational information is communicated within this complex structure, we produced a series of recombinant and proteolytic rat motor domain fragments, which we analyzed enzymatically. A recombinant 210-kDa half-motor domain fragment surprisingly exhibited a 6-fold higher steady state ATPase activity than a 380-kDa complete motor domain fragment. The increased ATPase activity was associated with a complete loss of sensitivity to inhibition by vanadate and an approximately 100-fold increase in the rate of ADP release. The time course of product release was discovered to be biphasic, and each phase was stimulated approximately 1000-fold by microtubule binding to the 380-kDa motor domain. Both the half-motor and full motor domain fragments were remarkably resistant to tryptic proteolysis, exhibiting either two or three major cleavage sites. Cleavage near the C terminus of the 380-kDa motor domain released a 32-kDa fragment and abolished sensitivity to vanadate. Cleavage at this site was insensitive to ATP or 5'-adenylyl-beta,gamma-imidodiphosphate but was blocked by ADP-AlF3 or ADP-vanadate. Based on these data, we proposed a model for long range allosteric control of product release at AAA1 and AAA3 through the microtubule-binding stalk and the C-terminal domain, the latter of which may interact with AAA1 to close the motor domain ring in a cross-bridge cycle-dependent manner.     

Engineering the processive run length of the kinesin motor

Conventional kinesin is a highly processive molecular motor that takes several hundred steps per encounter with a microtubule. Processive motility is believed to result from the coordinated, hand-over-hand motion of the two heads of the kinesin dimer, but the specific factors that determine kinesin's run length (distance traveled per microtubule encounter) are not known. Here, we show that the neck coiled-coil, a structure adjacent to the motor domain, plays an important role in governing the run length. By adding positive charge to the neck coiled-coil, we have created ultra-processive kinesin mutants that have fourfold longer run lengths than the wild-type motor, but that have normal ATPase activity and motor velocity. Conversely, adding negative charge on the neck coiled-coil decreases the run length. The gain in processivity can be suppressed by either proteolytic cleavage of tubulin's negatively charged COOH terminus or by high salt concentrations. Therefore, modulation of processivity by the neck coiled-coil appears to involve an electrostatic tethering interaction with the COOH terminus of tubulin. The ability to readily increase kinesin processivity by mutation, taken together with the strong sequence conservation of the neck coiled-coil, suggests that evolutionary pressures may limit kinesin's run length to optimize its in vivo function.     

K-loop insertion restores microtubule depolymerizing activity of a "neckless" MCAK mutant

Unlike most kinesins, mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) does not translocate along the surface of microtubules (MTs), but instead depolymerizes them. Among the motile kinesins, refinements that are unique for specific cellular functions, such as directionality and processivity, are under the control of a "neck" domain adjacent to the ATP-hydrolyzing motor domain. Despite its apparent lack of motility, MCAK also contains a neck domain. We found that deletions and alanine substitutions of highly conserved positively charged residues in the MCAK neck domain significantly reduced MT depolymerization activity. Furthermore, substitution of MCAK's neck domain with either the positively charged KIF1A K-loop or poly-lysine rescues the loss of MT-depolymerizing activity observed in the neckless MCAK mutant. We propose that the neck, analogously to the K-loop, interacts electrostatically with the tubulin COOH terminus to permit diffusional translocation of MCAK along the surface of MTs. This weak-binding interaction may also play an important role in processivity of MCAK-induced MT depolymerization.     

Processivity of the Kinesin-2 KIF3A Results from Rear Head Gating and Not Front Head Gating

The kinesin-2 family motor KIF3A/B works together with dynein to bidirectionally transport intraflagellar particles, melanosomes, and neuronal vesicles. Compared with kinesin-1, kinesin-2 is less processive, and its processivity is more sensitive to load, suggesting that processivity may be controlled by different gating mechanisms. We used stopped-flow and steady-state kinetics experiments, along with single-molecule and multimotor assays to characterize the entire kinetic cycle of a KIF3A homodimer that exhibits motility similar to that of full-length KIF3A/B. Upon first encounter with a microtubule, the motor rapidly exchanges both mADP and mATP. When adenosine 5′-[(β,γ)-imido]triphosphate was used to entrap the motor in a two-head-bound state, exchange kinetics were unchanged, indicating that rearward strain in the two-head-bound state does not alter nucleotide binding to the front head. A similar lack of front head gating was found when intramolecular strain was enhanced by shortening the neck linker domain from 17 to 14 residues. In single-molecule assays in ADP, the motor dissociates at 2.1 s⁻¹, 20-fold slower than the stepping rate, demonstrating the presence of rear head gating. In microtubule pelleting assays, the K_D^Mt is similar in ADP and ATP. The data and accompanying simulations suggest that, rather than KIF3A processivity resulting from strain-dependent regulation of nucleotide binding (front head gating), the motor spends a significant fraction of its hydrolysis cycle in a low affinity state but dissociates only slowly from this state. This work provides a mechanism to explain differences in the load-dependent properties of kinesin-1 and kinesin-2.     

Identification and properties of the catalytic domain of mammalian DNA polymerase beta

Rat DNA polymerase beta (beta-pol) is a 39-kDa protein organized in two tightly folded domains, 8-kDa N-terminal and 31-kDa C-terminal domains, connected by a short protease-sensitive region. The 8-kDa domain contributes template binding to the intact protein, and we now report that the 31-kDa C-terminal domain contributes catalytic activity. Our results show that this domain as a purified proteolytic fragment conducts DNA synthesis under appropriate conditions but the kcat is lower and primer extension properties are different from those of the intact enzyme. A proteolytic truncation of the 31-kDa catalytic domain fragment, to remove a 60-residue segment from the NH2-terminal end, results in nearly complete loss of activity, suggesting the importance of this segment. Overall, these results indicate that the domains of beta-pol have distinct functional roles, template binding and nucleotidyltransferase, respectively; yet, the intact protein is more active for each function than the isolated individual domain fragment.     

A tethering mechanism controls the processivity and kinetochore-microtubule plus-end enrichment of the kinesin-8 Kif18A

Metaphase chromosome positioning depends on Kif18A, a kinesin-8 that accumulates at and suppresses the dynamics of K-MT plus ends. By engineering Kif18A mutants that suppress MT dynamics but fail to concentrate at K-MT plus ends, we identify a mechanism that allows Kif18A to accumulate at K-MT plus ends to a level required to suppress chromosome movements. Enrichment of Kif18A at K-MT plus ends depends on its C-terminal tail domain, while the ability of Kif18A to suppress MT growth is conferred by the N-terminal motor domain. The Kif18A tail contains a second MT-binding domain that diffuses along the MT lattice, suggesting that it tethers the motor to the MT track. Consistently, the tail enhances Kif18A processivity and is crucial for it to accumulate at K-MT plus ends. The heightened processivity of Kif18A, conferred by its tail domain, thus promotes concentration of Kif18A at K-MT plus ends, where it suppresses their dynamics to control chromosome movements.     

She3p binds to the rod of yeast myosin V and prevents it from dimerizing, forming a single-headed motor complex

Vertebrate myosin Va is a dimeric processive motor that walks on actin filaments to deliver cargo. In contrast, the two class V myosins in budding yeast, Myo2p and Myo4p, are non-processive (Reck-Peterson, S. L., Tyska, M. J., Novick, P. J., and Mooseker, M. S. (2001) J. Cell Biol. 153, 1121-1126). We previously showed that a chimera with the motor domain of Myo4p on the backbone of vertebrate myosin Va was processive, demonstrating that the Myo4p motor domain has a high duty ratio. Here we examine the properties of a chimera containing the rod and globular tail of Myo4p joined to the motor domain and neck of mouse myosin Va. Surprisingly, the adaptor protein She3p binds to the rod region of Myo4p and forms a homogeneous single-headed myosin-She3p complex, based on sedimentation equilibrium and velocity data. We propose that She3p forms a heterocoiled-coil with Myo4p and is a subunit of the motor. She3p does not affect the maximal actin-activated ATPase in solution or the velocity of movement in an ensemble in vitro motility assay. At the single molecule level, the monomeric myosin-She3p complex showed no processivity. When this construct was dimerized with a leucine zipper, short processive runs were obtained. Robust continuous movement was observed when multiple monomeric myosin-She3p motors were bound to a quantum dot "cargo." We propose that continuous transport of mRNA by Myo4p-She3p in yeast is accomplished either by multiple high duty cycle monomers or by molecules that may be dimerized by She2p, the homodimeric downstream binding partner of She3p.     

The lipid binding pleckstrin homology domain in UNC-104 kinesin is necessary for synaptic vesicle transport in Caenorhabditis elegans

UNC-104 (KIF1A) is a kinesin motor that transports synaptic vesicles from the neuronal cell body to the terminal. Previous in vitro studies have shown that a Dictyostelium relative of UNC-104 transports liposomes containing acidic phospholipids, but whether this interaction is needed for the recognition and transport of synaptic vesicles in metazoans remains unexplored. Here, we have introduced mutations in the nonmotor domain of UNC-104 and examined whether these mutant motors can rescue an unc-104 Caenorhabditis elegans strain. We show that a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain in UNC-104 is essential for membrane transport in living C. elegans, that this PH domain binds specifically to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P(2)), and that point mutants in the PH domain that interfere with PI(4,5)P(2) binding in vitro also interfere with UNC-104 function in vivo. Several other lipid-binding modules could not effectively substitute for the UNC-104 PH domain in this in vivo assay. Real time imaging also revealed that a lipid-binding point mutation in the PH domain reduced movement velocity and processivity of individual UNC-104::GFP punctae in neurites. These results reveal a critical role for PI(4,5)P(2) binding in UNC-104-mediated axonal transport and shows that the cargo-binding properties of the distal PH domain can affect motor output.     

Role of the Kinesin Neck Region in Processive Microtubule-based Motility

Kinesin is a dimeric motor protein that can move along a microtubule for several microns without releasing (termed processive movement). The two motor domains of the dimer are thought to move in a coordinated, hand-over-hand manner. A region adjacent to kinesin's motor catalytic domain (the neck) contains a coiled coil that is sufficient for motor dimerization and has been proposed to play an essential role in processive movement. Recent models have suggested that the neck enables head-to-head communication by creating a stiff connection between the two motor domains, but also may unwind during the mechanochemical cycle to allow movement to new tubulin binding sites. To test these ideas, we mutated the neck coiled coil in a 560-amino acid (aa) dimeric kinesin construct fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP), and then assayed processivity using a fluorescence microscope that can visualize single kinesin–GFP molecules moving along a microtubule. Our results show that replacing the kinesin neck coiled coil with a 28-aa residue peptide sequence that forms a highly stable coiled coil does not greatly reduce the processivity of the motor. This result argues against models in which extensive unwinding of the coiled coil is essential for movement. Furthermore, we show that deleting the neck coiled coil decreases processivity 10-fold, but surprisingly does not abolish it. We also demonstrate that processivity is increased by threefold when the neck helix is elongated by seven residues. These results indicate that structural features of the neck coiled coil, although not essential for processivity, can tune the efficiency of single molecule motility.     

15 A resolution model of the monomeric kinesin motor, KIF1A

A two-headed structure has been widely believed to be essential for the kinesin molecular motor to move processively on the track, microtubules. However, we have recently demonstrated that a monomeric motor domain construct of KIF1A (C351), a kinesin superfamily protein, moves processively, taking about 700 steps before being detached from microtubules. To elucidate the mechanism of its single-headed processivity, we examined the C351 -MT interaction by mutant analysis and high-resolution cryo-EM. Mutant analysis indicated the importance of a highly positively charged loop, the "K loop," for such processivity. A 15 A resolution structure unambiguously docked with the available atomic models revealed "K loop" as an extra microtubule-binding domain specific to KIF1A, and bound to the C terminus of tubulin. The site-specific cross-linking further confirmed this model.     

The UNC-104/KIF1 family of kinesins

Most UNC-104/KIF1 kinesins are monomeric motors that transport membrane-bounded organelles toward the plus ends of microtubules. Recent evidence implies that KIF1A, a synaptic vesicle motor, moves processively. This surprising behavior for a monomeric motor depends upon a lysine-rich loop in KIF1A that binds to the negatively charged carboxyl terminus of tubulin and, in the context of motor processivity, compensates for the lack of a second motor domain on the KIF1A holoenzyme.     

Single fungal kinesin motor molecules move processively along microtubules

Conventional kinesins are two-headed molecular motors that move as single molecules micrometer-long distances on microtubules by using energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. The presence of two heads is a prerequisite for this processive motility, but other interacting domains, like the neck and K-loop, influence the processivity and are implicated in allowing some single-headed kinesins to move processively. Neurospora kinesin (NKin) is a phylogenetically distant, dimeric kinesin from Neurospora crassa with high gliding speed and an unusual neck domain. We quantified the processivity of NKin and compared it to human kinesin, HKin, using gliding and fluorescence-based processivity assays. Our data show that NKin is a processive motor. Single NKin molecules translocated microtubules in gliding assays on average 2.14 micro m (N = 46). When we tracked single, fluorescently labeled NKin motors, they moved on average 1.75 micro m (N = 182) before detaching from the microtubule, whereas HKin motors moved shorter distances (0.83 micro m, N = 229) under identical conditions. NKin is therefore at least twice as processive as HKin. These studies, together with biochemical work, provide a basis for experiments to dissect the molecular mechanisms of processive movement.     

Two Modes of Interaction of the Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein of Bacteriophage T7 with the DNA Polymerase-Thioredoxin Complex

The DNA polymerase encoded by bacteriophage T7 has low processivity. Escherichia coli thioredoxin binds to a segment of 76 residues in the thumb subdomain of the polymerase and increases the processivity. The binding of thioredoxin leads to the formation of two basic loops, loops A and B, located within the thioredoxin-binding domain (TBD). Both loops interact with the acidic C terminus of the T7 helicase. A relatively weak electrostatic mode involves the C-terminal tail of the helicase and the TBD, whereas a high affinity interaction that does not involve the C-terminal tail occurs when the polymerase is in a polymerization mode. T7 gene 2.5 single-stranded DNA-binding protein (gp2.5) also has an acidic C-terminal tail. gp2.5 also has two modes of interaction with the polymerase, but both involve the C-terminal tail of gp2.5. An electrostatic interaction requires the basic residues in loops A and B, and gp2.5 binds to both loops with similar affinity as measured by surface plasmon resonance. When the polymerase is in a polymerization mode, the C terminus of gene 2.5 protein interacts with the polymerase in regions outside the TBD. gp2.5 increases the processivity of the polymerase-helicase complex during leading strand synthesis. When loop B of the TBD is altered, abortive DNA products are observed during leading strand synthesis. Loop B appears to play an important role in communication with the helicase and gp2.5, whereas loop A plays a stabilizing role in these interactions.     

Oligomerization of the sensory and motor neuron-derived factor prevents protein O-glycosylation

The sensory and motor neuron-derived factor (SMDF) is a neuregulin that promotes Schwann cell proliferation and differentiation. Hence, understanding axon myelination is important to unveil the mechanisms involved in SMDF biogenesis, membrane delivery, and compartmentalization. SMDF is a type II membrane protein expressed as two distinct polypeptides of approximately 40 and 83 kDa. Whether the 83-kDa polypeptide results from posttranslational modifications of the protein monomers or protein dimerization remains unknown. Here we have addressed this question and shown that the 83-kDa polypeptide is an O-glycosylated form of the protein. Deletion of the N-terminal domain fully abrogates the SMDF O-glycosylation, indicating that incorporation of O-glycans occurs in the intracellular domain of the protein. Notably, O-glycosylated forms are excluded from partitioning into lipid raft microdomains. In addition, we found that heterologously expressed SMDF monomers interact in intact living cells as evidenced from fluorescence resonance energy transfer of cyan fluorescent protein/yellow fluorescent protein.SMDF fusion proteins. A stepwise deletion approach demonstrated that SMDF self-association is primarily determined by its transmembrane segment. Notably, biochemical analysis revealed that SMDF multimers are exclusively composed of the 40-kDa polypeptide. Collectively, these findings indicate that the 40-kDa form corresponds to unmodified SMDF, which may be present as multimers, whereas the 83-kDa polypeptide is a monomeric O-glycosylated form of the protein. Furthermore, our observations imply a role for oligomerization as a potential modulator of the distribution in membrane domains and O-glycosylation of the protein.     

The ATPase Cycle of the Mitotic Motor CENP-E

We have previously shown that the mitotic motor centrosome protein E (CENP-E) is capable of walking for more than 250 steps on its microtubule track without dissociating. We have examined the kinetics of this molecular motor to see if its enzymology explains this remarkable degree of processivity. We find that like the highly processive transport motor kinesin 1, the enzymatic cycle of CENP-E is characterized by rapid ATP binding, multiple enzymatic turnovers per diffusive encounter, and gating of nucleotide binding. These features endow CENP-E with a high duty cycle, a prerequisite for processivity. However, unlike kinesin 1, neck linker docking in CENP-E is slow, occurring at a rate closer to that for Eg5, a mitotic kinesin that takes only 5–10 steps per processive run. These results suggest that like kinesin 1, features outside of the catalytic domain of CENP-E may also play a role in regulating the processive behavior of this motor.     

The Vesicle Protein SAM-4 Regulates the Processivity of Synaptic Vesicle Transport

Axonal transport of synaptic vesicles (SVs) is a KIF1A/UNC-104 mediated process critical for synapse development and maintenance yet little is known of how SV transport is regulated. Using C. elegans as an in vivo model, we identified SAM-4 as a novel conserved vesicular component regulating SV transport. Processivity, but not velocity, of SV transport was reduced in sam-4 mutants. sam-4 displayed strong genetic interactions with mutations in the cargo binding but not the motor domain of unc-104. Gain-of-function mutations in the unc-104 motor domain, identified in this study, suppress the sam-4 defects by increasing processivity of the SV transport. Genetic analyses suggest that SAM-4, SYD-2/liprin-α and the KIF1A/UNC-104 motor function in the same pathway to regulate SV transport. Our data support a model in which the SV protein SAM-4 regulates the processivity of SV transport.     

Head-head coordination is required for the processive motion of cytoplasmic dynein, an AAA+ molecular motor

Cytoplasmic dynein is an AAA(+)-type molecular motor whose major components are two identical heavy chains containing six AAA(+) modules in tandem. It moves along a single microtubule in multiple steps which are accompanied with multiple ATP hydrolysis. This processive sliding is crucial for cargo transports in vivo. To examine how cytoplasmic dynein exhibits this processivity, we performed in vitro motility assays of two-headed full-length or truncated single-headed heavy chains. The results indicated that four to five molecules of the single-headed heavy chain were required for continuous microtubule sliding, while approximately one molecule of the two-headed full-length heavy chain was enough for the continuous sliding. The ratio of the stroking time to the total ATPase cycle time, which is a quantitative indicator of the processivity, was approximately 0.2 for the single-headed heavy chain, while it was approximately 0.6 for the full-length molecule. When two single-headed heavy chains were artificially linked by a coiled-coil of myosin, the processivity was restored. These results suggest that the two heads of a single cytoplasmic dynein communicate with each other to take processive steps along a microtubule.     

The domain organization and properties of individual domains of DNA topoisomerase V, a type 1B topoisomerase with DNA repair activities.

Topoisomerase V (Topo V) is a type IB (eukaryotic-like) DNA topoisomerase. It was discovered in the hyperthermophilic prokaryote Methanopyrus kandleri and is the only topoisomerase with associated apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site-processing activities. The structure of Topo V in the free and DNA-bound states was probed by limited proteolysis at 37 degrees C and 80 degrees C. The Topo V protein is comprised of (i) a 44-kDa NH(2)-terminal core subdomain, which contains the active site tyrosine residue for topoisomerase activity, (ii) an immediately adjacent 16-kDa subdomain that contains degenerate helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motifs, (iii) a protease-sensitive 18-kDa HhH "hinge" region, and (iv) a 34-kDa COOH-terminal HhH domain. Three truncated Topo V polypeptides comprising the NH(2)-terminal 44-kDa and 16-kDa domains (Topo61), the 44-, 16-, and 18-kDa domains (Topo78), and the COOH-terminal 34-kDa domain (Topo34) were cloned, purified, and characterized. Both Topo61 and Topo78 are active topoisomerases, but in contrast to Topo V these enzymes are inhibited by high salt concentrations. Topo34 has strong DNA-binding ability but shows no topoisomerase activity. Finally, we demonstrate that Topo78 and Topo34 possess AP lyase activities that are important in base excision DNA repair. Thus, Topo V has at least two active sites capable of processing AP DNA. The significance of multiple HhH motifs for the Topo V processivity is discussed.     

Turnover of the transferrin receptor is not influenced by removing most of the extracellular domain

We treated intact cells with trypsin to remove most of the external domain of the transferrin receptor and investigated what effect the absence of the external domain had on the turnover of the fragment that remained associated with the cells. To detect the cell-associated tryptic fragment, which contains a small amount of the external domain, the transmembrane domain, and the cytoplasmic domain, we prepared an anti-peptide antibody against a segment of the cytoplasmic domain. This antibody specifically immunoprecipitated the intact transferrin receptor as well as a 21-kDa peptide from trypsin-treated HeLa cells. Several lines of evidence indicated that the 21-kDa peptide was the cell-associated tryptic fragment of the transferrin receptor. The fragment was only present in trypsin-treated cells; the fragment migrated as a dimer in nonreducing sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, as it should if it were derived from the transferrin receptor; a goat antibody prepared to the purified human transferrin receptor also precipitated the 21-kDa peptide from trypsinized cells. In addition, treating the tryptic fragment with neuraminidase increased the electrophoretic mobility in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels, suggesting the fragment contained O-linked carbohydrate. When cells were trypsinized and then incubated at 37 degrees C, the half-life of the tryptic fragment (15 +/- 4 h) was not significantly different than the half-life of the intact receptor (19 +/- 6 h). This indicates that removing 95% of the external domain of the transferrin receptor has little effect on processes operating in the turnover of the receptor.