The role of proteases in regulating Eph/ephrin signaling

Proteases regulate a myriad of cell functions, both in normal and disease states. In addition to protein turnover, they regulate a range of signaling processes, including those mediated by Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. A variety of proteases is reported to directly cleave Ephs and/or ephrins under different conditions, to promote receptor and/or ligand shedding, and regulate receptor/ligand internalisation and signaling. They also cleave other adhesion proteins in response to Eph-ephrin interactions, to indirectly facilitate Eph-mediated functions. Proteases thus contribute to Eph/ephrin mediated changes in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, in cell morphology and in cell migration and invasion, in a manner which appears to be tightly regulated by, and co-ordinated with, Eph signaling. This review summarizes the current literature describing the function and regulation of protease activities during Eph/ephrin-mediated cell signaling.     

Tissue transglutaminase clusters soluble A-type ephrins into functionally active high molecular weight oligomers

The Eph receptors and their ligands, the ephrins, are thought to act at points of close cell-cell contact to elicit bi-directional signaling in receptor and ligand expressing cells. However, when cultured in vitro, some A-type ephrins are released from the cell surface and it is unclear if these soluble ephrins participate in Eph receptor activation. We show that soluble ephrin A5 is subject to oligomerization. Ephrins A1 and A5 are substrates for a cross-linking enzyme, tissue transglutaminase, which mediates the formation of oligomeric ephrin. Transglutaminase-cross-linked ephrin binds to A-type Eph receptors, stimulates Eph kinase activity, and promotes invasion and migration of HeLa cells. Transglutaminase-mediated oligomerization of soluble ephrin potentially represents a novel mechanism of forward signaling through Eph receptors and may extend the influence of A-type ephrins beyond cell contact mediated signaling.     

The role of ephrins and Eph receptors in cancer

Eph receptors are the largest receptor tyrosine kinase family of transmembrane proteins with an extracellular domain capable of recognizing signals from the cells’ environment and influencing cell–cell interaction and cell migration. Ephrins are the ligands to Eph receptors and stimulate bi-directional signaling of the Eph/ephrin axis. Eph receptor and ephrin overexpression can result in tumorigenesis as related to tumor growth and survival and is associated with angiogenesis and metastasis in many types of human cancer. Recent data suggest that Eph/ephrin signaling could play an important role in the development of novel inhibition strategies and cancer treatments to potentially target this receptor tyrosine kinase and/or its ligand. A deeper understanding of the molecular basis for normal versus defective cell–cell interaction through the Eph/ephrin axis will enable the potential development of novel cancer treatments. This review emphasizes the biology of Eph/ephrin as well as the potential for novel targeted therapy through this pathway.     

Recruitment of Eph receptors into signaling clusters does not require ephrin contact

Eph receptors and their cell membrane-bound ephrin ligands regulate cell positioning and thereby establish or stabilize patterns of cellular organization. Although it is recognized that ephrin clustering is essential for Eph function, mechanisms that relay information of ephrin density into cell biological responses are poorly understood. We demonstrate by confocal time-lapse and fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy that within minutes of binding ephrin-A5-coated beads, EphA3 receptors assemble into large clusters. While remaining positioned around the site of ephrin contact, Eph clusters exceed the size of the interacting ephrin surface severalfold. EphA3 mutants with compromised ephrin-binding capacity, which alone are incapable of cluster formation or phosphorylation, are recruited effectively and become phosphorylated when coexpressed with a functional receptor. Our findings reveal consecutive initiation of ephrin-facilitated Eph clustering and cluster propagation, the latter of which is independent of ephrin contacts and cytosolic Eph signaling functions but involves direct Eph-Eph interactions.     

Eph/ephrin recognition and the role of Eph/ephrin clusters in signaling initiation

The Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands play crucial roles in a large number of cell–cell interaction events, including those associated with axon pathfinding, neuronal cell migration and vasculogenesis. They are also involved in the patterning of most tissues and overall cell positioning in the development of the vertebrate body plan. The Eph/ephrin signaling system manifests several unique features that differentiate it from other receptor tyrosine kinases, including initiation of bi-directional signaling cascades and the existence of ligand and receptor subclasses displaying promiscuous intra-subclass interactions, but very rare inter-subclass interactions. In this review we briefly discuss these features and focus on recent studies of the unique and expansive high-affinity Eph/ephrin assemblies that form at the sites of cell–cell contact and are required for Eph signaling initiation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Emerging recognition and activation mechanisms of receptor tyrosine kinases.     

Ectodomain structures of Eph receptors

Eph receptors, the largest subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and their ephrin ligands are important mediators of cell-cell communication that regulate axon guidance, long-term potentiation, and stem cell development, among others. By now, many Eph receptors and ephrins have also been found to play important roles in the progression of cancer. Since both the receptor and the ligand are membrane-bound, their interaction leads to the multimerization of both molecules to distinct clusters within their respective plasma membranes, resulting in the formation of discrete signaling centers. In addition, and unique to Eph receptors and ephrins, their interaction initiates bi-directional signaling cascades where information is transduced in the direction of both the receptor- and the ligand-bearing cells. The Ephs and the ephrins are divided into two subclasses, A and B, based on their affinities for each other and on sequence conservation. Crystal structures and other biophysical studies have indicated that isolated extracellular Eph and ephrin domains initially form high-affinity heterodimers around a hydrophobic loop of the ligand that is buried in a hydrophobic pocket on the surface of the receptor. The dimers can then further arrange by weaker interactions into higher-order Eph/ephrin clusters observed in vivo at the sites of cell-cell contact. Although the hetero-dimerization is a universal way to initiate signaling, other extracellular domains of Ephs are involved in the formation of higher-order clusters. The structures also show important differences defining the unique partner preferences of the two ligand and receptor subclasses, namely, how subclass specificity is determined both by individual interacting residues and by the precise architectural arrangement of ligands and receptors within the complexes.     

Excitatory Eph receptors and adhesive ephrin ligands

Ephrins are cell surface associated ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and are implicated in repulsive axon guidance, cell migration, topographic mapping and angiogenesis. During the past year, Eph receptors have been shown to associate with glutamate receptors in excitatory neurons, suggesting a role in synapse formation or function. Moreover, ephrin/Eph signaling appears to regulate neural stem cell proliferation and migration in adult mouse brains. The mode of action of ephrin/Ephs has been expanded from repulsion to adhesion and from cell surface attachment to regulated cleavage.     

EphA receptor signaling--complexity and emerging themes

The impact of Eph and ephrin signaling on cell behavior is complex and highly context dependent. Forward signaling initiated by Eph receptor activation and reverse signaling initiated by ephrin activation often mediate opposite effects. The apparent ligand-independent functions of Eph receptors recognized recently add another layer of complexity. This review will attempt to sort out the information generated recently on signaling by the A subfamily of Eph receptors and ephrin ligands. We will focus on EphA/ephrin-A signaling in the context of several physiological and disease processes, where new progresses have been made lately and unifying themes are emerging amid previous confusions. For more comprehensive survey of literature on Eph/ephrin signaling pathways and networks, readers are referred to outstanding reviews both in this volume and in other recent publications.     

Non-SH2/PDZ reverse signaling by ephrins

Great strides have been made regarding our understanding of the processes and signaling events influenced by Eph/ephrin signaling that play a role in cell adhesion and cell movement. However, the precise mechanisms by which these signaling events regulate cell and tissue architecture still need further resolution. The Eph/ephrin signaling pathways and the ability to regulate cell-cell adhesion and motility constitutes an impressive system for regulating tissue separation and morphogenesis (Pasquale, 2005, 2008 [1,2]). Moreover, the de-regulation of this signaling system is linked to the promotion of aggressive and metastatic tumors in humans [2]. In the following section, we discuss some of the interesting mechanisms by which ephrins can signal through their own intracellular domains (reverse signaling) either independent of forward signaling or in addition to forward signaling through a cognate receptor. In this review we discuss how ephrins (Eph ligands) "reverse signal" through their intracellular domains to affect cell adhesion and movement, but the focus is on modes of action that are independent of SH2 and PDZ interactions.     

The role of the Eph-ephrin signalling system in the regulation of developmental patterning

The Eph and ephrin system, consisting of fourteen Eph receptor tyrosine kinase proteins and nine ephrin membrane proteins in vertebrates, has been implicated in the regulation of many critical events during development. Binding of cell surface Eph and ephrin proteins results in bi-directional signals, which regulate the cytoskeletal, adhesive and motile properties of the interacting cells. Through these signals Eph and ephrin proteins are involved in early embryonic cell movements, which establish the germ layers, cell movements involved in formation of tissue boundaries and the pathfinding of axons. This review focuses on two vertebrate models, the zebrafish and mouse, in which experimental perturbation of Eph and/or ephrin expression in vivo have provided important insights into the role and functioning of the Eph/ephrin system.     

Regulation of signaling interactions and receptor endocytosis in growing blood vessels

Blood vessels and the lymphatic vasculature are extensive tubular networks formed by endothelial cells that have several indispensable functions in the developing and adult organism. During growth and tissue regeneration but also in many pathological settings, these vascular networks expand, which is critically controlled by the receptor EphB4 and the ligand ephrin-B2. An increasing body of evidence links Eph/ephrin molecules to the function of other receptor tyrosine kinases and cell surface receptors. In the endothelium, ephrin-B2 is required for clathrin-dependent internalization and full signaling activity of VEGFR2, the main receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. In vascular smooth muscle cells, ephrin-B2 antagonizes clathrin-dependent endocytosis of PDGFRβ and controls the balanced activation of different signal transduction processes after stimulation with platelet-derived growth factor. This review summarizes the important roles of Eph/ephrin molecules in vascular morphogenesis and explains the function of ephrin-B2 as a molecular hub for receptor endocytosis in the vasculature.     

Regulation of signaling interactions and receptor endocytosis in growing blood vessels

Blood vessels and the lymphatic vasculature are extensive tubular networks formed by endothelial cells that have several indispensable functions in the developing and adult organism. During growth and tissue regeneration but also in many pathological settings, these vascular networks expand, which is critically controlled by the receptor EphB4 and the ligand ephrin-B2. An increasing body of evidence links Eph/ephrin molecules to the function of other receptor tyrosine kinases and cell surface receptors. In the endothelium, ephrin-B2 is required for clathrin-dependent internalization and full signaling activity of VEGFR2, the main receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. In vascular smooth muscle cells, ephrin-B2 antagonizes clathrin-dependent endocytosis of PDGFRβ and controls the balanced activation of different signal transduction processes after stimulation with platelet-derived growth factor. This review summarizes the important roles of Eph/ephrin molecules in vascular morphogenesis and explains the function of ephrin-B2 as a molecular hub for receptor endocytosis in the vasculature.     

Regulation of cell differentiation by Eph receptor and ephrin signaling

There is increasing evidence that in addition to having major roles in morphogenesis, in some tissues Eph receptor and ephrin signaling regulates the differentiation of cells. In one mode of deployment, cell contact dependent Eph-ephrin activation induces a distinct fate of cells at the interface of their expression domains, for example in early ascidian embryos and in the vertebrate hindbrain. In another mode, overlapping Eph receptor and ephrin expression underlies activation within a cell population, which promotes or inhibits cell differentiation in bone remodelling, neural progenitors and keratinocytes. Eph-ephrin activation also contributes to formation of the appropriate number of progenitor cells by increasing or decreasing cell proliferation. These multiple roles of Eph receptor and ephrin signaling may enable a coupling between morphogenesis and the differentiation and proliferation of cells.     

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induction of endothelial ephrin A1 expression is mediated by a p38 MAPK- and SAPK/JNK-dependent but nuclear factor-kappa B-independent mechanism

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a multifunctional cytokine that induces a broad spectrum of responses including angiogenesis. Angiogenesis promoted by TNF-alpha is mediated, at least in part, by ephrin A1, a member of the ligand family for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Although TNF-alpha induces ephrin A1 expression in endothelial cells, the signaling pathways mediating ephrin A1 induction remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the signaling mechanisms of TNF-alpha-dependent induction of ephrin A1 in endothelial cells. Both TNFR1 and TNFR2 appear to be involved in regulating ephrin A1 expression in endothelial cells, because neutralizing antibodies to either TNFR1 or TNFR2 inhibited TNF-alpha-induced ephrin A1 expression. Inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) activation by a trans-dominant inhibitory isoform of mutant IkappaBalpha did not affect ephrin A1 induction, suggesting that NF-kappaB proteins are not major regulators of ephrin A1 expression. In contrast, ephrin A1 induction was blocked by inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) or SAPK/JNK, but not p42/44 MAPK, using either selective chemical inhibitors or dominant-negative forms of p38 MAPK or TNF receptor-associated factor 2. These findings indicate that TNF-alpha-induced ephrin A1 expression is mediated through JNK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. Taken together, the results of our study demonstrated that induction of ephrin A1 in endothelial cells by TNF-alpha is mediated through both p38 MAPK and SAPK/JNK, but not p42/44 MAPK or NF-kappaB, pathways.     

Regulation of cell differentiation by Eph receptor and ephrin signaling

There is increasing evidence that in addition to having major roles in morphogenesis, in some tissues Eph receptor and ephrin signaling regulates the differentiation of cells. In one mode of deployment, cell contact dependent Eph-ephrin activation induces a distinct fate of cells at the interface of their expression domains, for example in early ascidian embryos and in the vertebrate hindbrain. In another mode, overlapping Eph receptor and ephrin expression underlies activation within a cell population, which promotes or inhibits cell differentiation in bone remodelling, neural progenitors and keratinocytes. Eph-ephrin activation also contributes to formation of the appropriate number of progenitor cells by increasing or decreasing cell proliferation. These multiple roles of Eph receptor and ephrin signaling may enable a coupling between morphogenesis and the differentiation and proliferation of cells.     

EphA2 Signaling Following Endocytosis: Role of Tiam1

Eph receptors and their membrane‐bound ligands, the ephrins, represent a complex subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Eph/ephrin binding can lead to various and opposite cellular behaviors such as adhesion versus repulsion, or cell migration versus cell‐adhesion. Recently, Eph endocytosis has been identified as one of the critical steps responsible for such diversity. Eph receptors, as many RTKs, are rapidly endocytosed following ligand‐mediated activation and traffic through endocytic compartments prior to degradation. However, it is becoming obvious that endocytosis controls signaling in many different manners. Here we showed that activated EphA2 are degraded in the lysosomes and that about 35% of internalized receptors are recycled back to the plasma membrane. Our study is also the first to demonstrate that EphA2 retains the capacity to signal in endosomes. In particular, activated EphA2 interacted with the Rho family GEF Tiam1 in endosomes. This association led to Tiam1 activation, which in turn increased Rac1 activity and facilitated Eph/ephrin endocytosis. Disrupting Tiam1 function with RNA interference impaired both ephrinA1‐dependent Rac1 activation and ephrinA1‐induced EphA2 endocytosis. In summary, our findings shed new light on the regulation of EphA2 endocytosis, intracellular trafficking and signal termination and establish Tiam1 as an important modulator of EphA2 signaling .