Mitochondrial inhibitor sensitizes non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by reactive oxygen species and Bcl-XL/p53-mediated amplification mechanisms

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising agent for anticancer therapy; however, non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cells are relatively TRAIL resistant. Identification of small molecules that can restore NSCLC susceptibility to TRAIL-induced apoptosis is meaningful. We found here that rotenone, as a mitochondrial respiration inhibitor, preferentially increased NSCLC cells sensitivity to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis at subtoxic concentrations, the mechanisms by which were accounted by the upregulation of death receptors and the downregulation of c-FLIP (cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein). Further analysis revealed that death receptors expression by rotenone was regulated by p53, whereas c-FLIP downregulation was blocked by Bcl-X_L overexpression. Rotenone triggered the mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which subsequently led to Bcl-X_L downregulation and PUMA upregulation. As PUMA expression was regulated by p53, the PUMA, Bcl-X_L and p53 in rotenone-treated cells form a positive feedback amplification loop to increase the apoptosis sensitivity. Mitochondria-derived ROS, however, promote the formation of this amplification loop. Collectively, we concluded that ROS generation, Bcl-X_L and p53-mediated amplification mechanisms had an important role in the sensitization of NSCLC cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis by rotenone. The combined TRAIL and rotenone treatment may be appreciated as a useful approach for the therapy of NSCLC that warrants further investigation.Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has emerged as a promising cancer therapeutic because it can selectively induce apoptosis in tumor cells in vitro, and most importantly, in vivo with little adverse effect on normal cells.¹ However, a number of cancer cells are resistant to TRAIL, especially highly malignant tumors such as lung cancer.^{2, 3} Lung cancer, especially the non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) constitutes a heavy threat to human life. Presently, the morbidity and mortality of NSCLC has markedly increased in the past decade,⁴ which highlights the need for more effective treatment strategies.TRAIL has been shown to interact with five receptors, including the death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5), the decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2, and osteoprotegerin.⁵ Ligation of TRAIL to DR4 or DR5 allows for the recruitment of Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which leads to the formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) and the subsequent activation of caspase-8/10.⁶ The effector caspase-3 is activated by caspase-8, which cleaves numerous regulatory and structural proteins resulting in cell apoptosis. Caspase-8 can also cleave the Bcl-2 inhibitory BH3-domain protein (Bid), which engages the intrinsic apoptotic pathway by binding to Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) and Bcl-2 homologous antagonist killer (BAK). The oligomerization between Bcl-2 and Bax promotes the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria to cytosol, and facilitates the formation of apoptosome and caspase-9 activation.⁷ Like caspase-8, caspase-9 can also activate caspase-3 and initiate cell apoptosis. Besides apoptosis-inducing molecules, several apoptosis-inhibitory proteins also exist and have function even when apoptosis program is initiated. For example, cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) is able to suppress DISC formation and apoptosis induction by sequestering FADD.^{8, 9, 10, 11}Until now, the recognized causes of TRAIL resistance include differential expression of death receptors, constitutively active AKT and NF-κB,^{12, 13} overexpression of c-FLIP and IAPs, mutations in Bax and BAK gene.² Hence, resistance can be overcome by the use of sensitizing agents that modify the deregulated death receptor expression and/or apoptosis signaling pathways in cancer cells.⁵ Many sensitizing agents have been developed in a variety of tumor cell models.² Although the clinical effectiveness of these agents needs further investigation, treatment of TRAIL-resistant tumor cells with sensitizing agents, especially the compounds with low molecular weight, as well as prolonged plasma half-life represents a promising trend for cancer therapy.Mitochondria emerge as intriguing targets for cancer therapy. Metabolic changes affecting mitochondria function inside cancer cells endow these cells with distinctive properties and survival advantage worthy of drug targeting, mitochondria-targeting drugs offer substantial promise as clinical treatment with minimal side effects.^{14, 15, 16} Rotenone is a potent inhibitor of NADH oxidoreductase in complex I, which demonstrates anti-neoplastic activity on a variety of cancer cells.^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21} However, the neurotoxicity of rotenone limits its potential application in cancer therapy. To avoid it, rotenone was effectively used in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs to kill cancerous cells.²²In our previous investigation, we found that rotenone was able to suppress membrane Na⁺,K⁺-ATPase activity and enhance ouabain-induced cancer cell death.²³ Given these facts, we wonder whether rotenone may also be used as a sensitizing agent that can restore the susceptibility of NSCLC cells toward TRAIL-induced apoptosis, and increase the antitumor efficacy of TRAIL on NSCLC. To test this hypothesis, we initiated this study.     

Caspase-9 mediates Puma activation in UCN-01-induced apoptosis

The protein kinase inhibitor 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) is one of the most potent and frequently used proapoptotic stimuli. The BH3-only molecule of Bcl-2 family proteins has been reported to contribute to UCN-01-induced apoptosis. Here we have found that UCN-01 triggers Puma-induced mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. Our data confirmed that Akt-FoxO3a pathway mediated Puma activation. Importantly, we elucidate the detailed mechanisms of Puma-induced apoptosis. Our data have also demonstrated that caspase-9 is a decisive molecule of Puma induction after UCN-01 treatment. Caspase-9 mediates apoptosis through two kinds of feedback loops. On the one hand, caspase-9 enhances Puma activation by cleaving Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL independent of caspase-3. On the other hand, caspase-9 directly activated caspase-3 in the presence of caspase-3. Caspase-3 could cleave XIAP in an another positive feedback loop to further sensitize cancer cells to UCN-01-induced apoptosis. Therefore, caspase-9 mediates Puma activation to determine the threshold for overcoming chemoresistance in cancer cells.The apoptosis pathway is closely related to the Bcl-2 family proteins in which antiapoptotic members sequester multidomain proapoptotic proteins, thereby inhibiting their active role in apoptosis. In contrast, BH3-only proteins that are considered stress sensors can dissociate Bax-like proteins from their antiapoptotic sequestrators, and thus leading to apoptosis.¹The expression of Bcl-2 family proteins is regulated during carcinogenesis,¹ and the expression of both the Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL antiapoptotic proteins is associated with resistance to antitumor agents such as cisplatin (CP).² The inhibition of the protective function of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 members can either restore the normal apoptotic process in cancer cells or circumvent resistance to chemotherapy.^3,4 In this regard, enhanced expression of BH3-only proteins can effectively bind the antiapoptotic members and prevent the function of these proteins.Some reports suggest that the BH3-only protein Puma has important roles in p53-dependent and -independent apoptosis in human cancer cells and mediates cell death through the Bcl-2 family proteins Bax/Bak and the mitochondrial pathway.^5,6 Our studies also reveal that Puma upregulation induces cell apoptosis in chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells,^7,8 confirming the requisite role of Puma in chemosensitivity.7-Hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) is a protein kinase C-selective inhibitor that is successfully used in phase I and II clinical trials.^9,10 As a modulator, UCN-01 enhances the cytotoxicity of other anticancer drugs such as DNA-damaging agents and antimetabolite drugs by putative abrogation of G2- and/or S-phase accumulation induced by these anticancer agents.¹¹ As a single agent, UCN-01 exhibits two key biochemical effects, namely accumulation of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and induction of apoptosis.¹² Both these effects may be important for its anticancer activity. Previous studies have demonstrated that UCN-01 potently decreased the levels of activated the phosphorylation level of Akt (p-Akt) in in vitro or in in vivo systems.^{12, 13, 14} Some researchers have also approved that UCN-01 can modulate Bcl-2 family members to potentiate apoptosis in cancer cells.^15,16 These reports suggest that Akt and Bcl-2 family proteins may be the potent targets of UCN-01 to trigger cancer cell apoptosis.In this study, we also investigate the role of Puma in UCN-01-induced apoptosis and confirm that p53-independent Puma induction is pivotal for the anticancer effects of UCN-01. Moreover, we first elucidate the detailed mechanism of Puma-induced apoptosis after UCN-01 treatment. We found that Puma expression mediated caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation. Among the caspase proteins, caspase-9 has a key role in Puma-induced apoptosis. Our data demonstrated that caspase-9 could mediate Puma-induced apoptosis through two feedback pathways. On the one hand, activated caspase-9 was initiated followed by caspase-3 activity, and activated caspase-3 cleaved XIAP in a positive feedback loop to strengthen Puma expression. On the other hand, caspase-9 itself cleaved antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL to positively enhance Puma induction. These results provide the detailed mechanistic insight into therapeutic response to UCN-01 and the theoretical basis for its applications.     

Intramitochondrial recruitment of endolysosomes mediates Smac degradation and constitutes a novel intrinsic apoptosis antagonizing function of XIAP E3 ligase

Intrinsic apoptosis involves BH3-only protein activation of Bax/Bak-mediated mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). Consequently, cytochrome c is released from the mitochondria to activate caspases, and Smac (second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases) to inhibit XIAP-mediated caspase suppression. Dysfunctional mitochondria can be targeted for lysosomal degradation via autophagy (mitophagy), or directly through mitochondria-derived vesicle transport. However, the extent of autophagy and lysosomal interactions with apoptotic mitochondria remains largely unknown. We describe here a novel pathway of endolysosomal processing of mitochondria, activated in response to canonical BH3-only proteins and mitochondrial depolarization. We report that expression of canonical BH3-only proteins, tBid, Bim_EL, Bik, Bad, and mitophagy receptor mutants of atypical BH3-only proteins, Bnip3 and Bnip3L/Nix, leads to prominent relocalization of endolysosomes into inner mitochondrial compartments, in a manner independent of mitophagy. As an upstream regulator, we identified the XIAP E3 ligase. In response to mitochondrial depolarization, XIAP actuates Bax-mediated MOMP, even in the absence of BH3-only protein signaling. Subsequently, in an E3 ligase-dependent manner, XIAP rapidly localizes inside all the mitochondria, and XIAP-mediated mitochondrial ubiquitylation catalyses interactions of Rab membrane targeting components Rabex-5 and Rep-1 (RFP-tagged Rab escort protein-1), and Rab5- and Rab7-positive endolysosomes, at and within mitochondrial membrane compartments. While XIAP-mediated MOMP permits delayed cytochrome c release, within the mitochondria XIAP selectively signals lysosome- and proteasome-associated degradation of its inhibitor Smac. These findings suggest a general mechanism to lower the mitochondrial apoptotic potential via intramitochondrial degradation of Smac.The intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is required for efficient chemotherapeutic killing of cancer cells,¹ and is initiated through BH3-only protein activation of Bax/Bak-mediated mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). MOMP releases cytochrome c to activate effector caspases.² Conversely, inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family members suppress initiator and effector caspases via direct binding and E3 ligase activities.^{3, 4, 5} Consequently, MOMP-induced release of Smac (second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases) from the mitochondria, to inhibit XIAP (X-chromosome-linked IAP)-mediated caspase suppression, can be required for apoptosis.⁶Autophagy, a lysosomal degradative mechanism undergoing extensive crosstalk with cell death and survival pathways,⁷ degrades damaged mitochondria in a process termed mitophagy.^{8, 9} Damaged mitochondria are targeted by lysosomal degradation through the recruitment of autophagy receptors to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM),⁸ or via delivery of mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs) directly to the lysosome.¹⁰ The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin targets and ubiquitylates mitochondria, mediating both MDV degradation¹¹ and autophagy receptor-dependent mitophagy.^{12, 13} Alternatively, Fundc1¹⁴ and atypical BH3-only Nip family proteins Bnip3 and Bnip3L/Nix localize to the OMM and act as mitophagy receptors via their LC3-interacting region (LIR).^{15, 16, 17, 18} While targeting of damaged mitochondria suggests that mitophagy may counter apoptotic mitochondria, mitophagy occurs progressively over days,^{12, 14, 16, 17, 19} a rate that is likely insufficient to alter intracellular propagation of mitochondrial apoptosis, which can occur within minutes.^{20, 21} Indeed, Bnip3- and Fundc1-induced mitophagy have no direct effect on apoptosis,^{14, 18} and we determined that Bnip3-mediated mitophagy was cytoprotective if activated before apoptosis.¹⁷ While MDV delivery of mitochondria to lysosomes operates at a higher rate, minutes to hours,¹⁰ this process is regulated by Parkin and restricted to specific mitochondrial components.¹¹ Overall, for most intrinsic apoptosis scenarios it remains unknown whether lysosomal processing of mitochondria influences their capacity to activate or enhance apoptosis.Here, we used high-resolution imaging to evaluate the behavior of apoptosis, autophagy, lysosomal and ubiquitylation pathways in response to canonical (tBid, Bim_EL, Bik, Bad) and atypical (Bnip3, Bnip3L/Nix) BH3-only protein expression. We report that, in parallel to intrinsic apoptosis signaling, canonical BH3-only proteins induce the recruitment of endolysosomal machinery, in the absence of mitophagy. We determined that mitochondrial depolarization rapidly translocates the caspase inhibitor XIAP to the mitochondria. There, XIAP actuates MOMP within all mitochondria, concomitant with ubiquitylation at the OMM and inside OMM-bound regions, and triggers ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of Rab5 and its binding partners, as well as late endosomes into the mitochondria. Consequently, in a manner dependent on lysosome- and proteasome-activities, XIAP degrades its inhibitor Smac. We propose that in response to bioenergetic stress, the functional integration between lysosomes and mitochondria, mediated by XIAP and independent of autophagy, offers a novel mechanism to modulate mitochondrial apoptosis.     

Synergistic anti-tumor activity and inhibition of angiogenesis by cotargeting of oncogenic and death receptor pathways in human melanoma

Improving treatment of advanced melanoma may require the development of effective strategies to overcome resistance to different anti-tumor agents and to counteract relevant pro-tumoral mechanisms in the microenvironment. Here we provide preclinical evidence that these goals can be achieved in most melanomas, by co-targeting of oncogenic and death receptor pathways, and independently of their BRAF, NRAS, p53 and PTEN status. In 49 melanoma cell lines, we found independent susceptibility profiles for response to the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244, the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 and the death receptor ligand TRAIL, supporting the rationale for their association. Drug interaction analysis indicated that a strong synergistic anti-tumor activity could be achieved by the three agents and the AZD6244–TRAIL association on 20/21 melanomas, including cell lines resistant to the inhibitors or to TRAIL. Mechanistically, synergy was explained by enhanced induction of caspase-dependent apoptosis, mitochondrial depolarization and modulation of key regulators of extrinsic and intrinsic cell death pathways, including c-FLIP, BIM, BAX, clusterin, Mcl-1 and several IAP family members. Moreover, silencing experiments confirmed the central role of Apollon downmodulation in promoting the apoptotic response of melanoma cells to the combinatorial treatments. In SCID mice, the AZD6244–TRAIL association induced significant growth inhibition of a tumor resistant to TRAIL and poorly responsive to AZD6244, with no detectable adverse events on body weight and tissue histology. Reduction in tumor volume was associated not only with promotion of tumor apoptosis but also with suppression of the pro-angiogenic molecules HIF1α, VEGFα, IL-8 and TGFβ1 and with inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. These results suggest that synergistic co-targeting of oncogenic and death receptor pathways can not only overcome melanoma resistance to different anti-tumor agents in vitro but can also promote pro-apoptotic effects and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis in vivo.The development of mutant BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B)- and mitogen/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK)-specific inhibitors, such as Vemurafenib, Dabrafenib and Trametinib, as well as of monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, has markedly improved the treatment of advanced melanoma, as shown by highly significant effects, achieved in several trials, on progression-free and/or overall survival.^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5} However, a fraction of patients does not benefit from target-specific therapy or immunotherapy, and duration of clinical responses may be limited.^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5} Mechanisms of resistance to specific inhibitors⁶ and of tumor escape from immune recognition⁷ contribute to prevent induction of melanoma cell death by the new therapies and explain the urgent need for the identification of more effective approaches. Different strategies are being investigated to overcome melanoma resistance to single anti-tumor agents and to rescue tumor susceptibility to cell death, including co-targeting of constitutively active intracellular signaling pathways,^{8, 9, 10} association of target-specific drugs with inhibitors of autophagy or with endoplasmic reticulum-stress inducers^11,12 and association of anti-tumor agents that trigger the extrinsic and the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis.^{13, 14, 15}The latter approach is based on the combination of specific inhibitors of main oncogenic pathways, which in different tumor types can modulate relevant pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules in the intrinsic pathway of cell death,^{16, 17, 18} with targeting of the extrinsic, death receptor-dependent pathway, by usage of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) or of agonistic death receptor 5 (DR5)-specific mAbs.¹⁹ Indeed, this approach has shown that association of MEK, pan-RAF or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors with TRAIL can overcome resistance to TRAIL^{13, 14, 15} and can lead to enhanced melanoma apoptosis in vitro through different mechanisms, including upregulation of bcl-2-like protein 11 isoform 1 (Bim) and activation of BCL2-associated X protein (Bax).^{13, 14, 15} Moreover, as hypothesized recently by Geserick et al.,²⁰ the association of MEK or pan-RAF inhibitors with TRAIL could even be exploited as a potential approach to promote rapid elimination of most tumor cells, thus preventing the emergence of secondary resistance to BRAF inhibitors. Furthermore, the interest in the death receptor pathway, as a therapeutic target, has been recently strengthened by the evidence that TRAIL mediates disruption of the tumor-associated vasculature²¹ and by the discovery of TIC10, a drug that stimulates production of TRAIL and that exerts significant anti-tumor activities in preclinical in vivo models, including aggressive intracranial xenografts of human glioblastoma cells.²²Nevertheless, it is currently not known whether co-targeting of MEK and/or PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and of the death receptor pathway in melanoma can overcome intrinsic resistance to each of the anti-tumor agents in most instances, irrespective of the different genetic make-up of the tumors, and whether this approach can exert synergistic, rather than additive, anti-melanoma effects. Furthermore, it remains to be verified whether the combination of MEK or PI3K/mTOR inhibitors with death receptor agonists (such as TRAIL itself or DR5-specific mAbs) may also exert significant pro-apoptotic effects in vivo on melanoma xenografts and whether this is associated with inhibition of relevant pro-tumoral processes in the tumor microenvironment.To address these issues, in this study we evaluated the anti-melanoma activity in vitro and in vivo of two- or three-drug associations using TRAIL, the MEK 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244/Selumetinib, which has significant clinical activity in melanoma,²³ and the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235, currently in clinical trials in different solid tumors, including melanoma (source www.clinicaltrials.gov). The results indicated that the three-agent (AZD6244/BEZ235/TRAIL) and two-agent (AZD6244/TRAIL) combinations exerted synergistic pro-apoptotic effects on most melanomas in a large panel. These results were observed even on melanoma cell lines resistant to TRAIL or to the inhibitors and independently of their BRAF, neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS), p53 and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) status. Moreover, an in vivo model showed that the AZD6244/TRAIL association promoted melanoma apoptosis associated with marked inhibition of angiogenesis.     

Bortezomib sensitises TRAIL-resistant HPV-positive head and neck cancer cells to TRAIL through a caspase-dependent,E6-independent mechanism

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is causative for a new and increasing form of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Although localised HPV-positive cancers have a favourable response to radio-chemotherapy (RT/CT), the impact of HPV in advanced or metastatic HNSCC remains to be defined and targeted therapeutics need to be tested for cancers resistant to RT/CT. To this end, we investigated the sensitivity of HPV-positive and -negative HNSCC cell lines to TRAIL (tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand), which induces tumour cell-specific apoptosis in various cancer types. A clear correlation was observed between HPV positivity and resistance to TRAIL compared with HPV-negative head and neck cancer cell lines. All TRAIL-resistant HPV-positive cell lines tested were sensitised to TRAIL-induced cell death by treatment with bortezomib, a clinically approved proteasome inhibitor. Bortezomib-mediated sensitisation to TRAIL was associated with enhanced activation of caspase-8, -9 and -3, elevated membrane expression levels of TRAIL-R2, cytochrome c release and G2/M arrest. Knockdown of caspase-8 significantly blocked cell death induced by the combination therapy, whereas the BH3-only protein Bid was not required for induction of apoptosis. XIAP depletion increased the sensitivity of both HPV-positive and -negative cells to TRAIL alone or in combination with bortezomib. In contrast, restoration of p53 following E6 knockdown in HPV-positive cells had no effect on their sensitivity to either single or combination therapy, suggesting a p53-independent pathway for the observed response. In summary, bortezomib-mediated proteasome inhibition sensitises previously resistant HPV-positive HNSCC cells to TRAIL-induced cell death through a mechanism involving both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways of apoptosis. The cooperative effect of these two targeted anticancer agents therefore represents a promising treatment strategy for RT/CT-resistant HPV-associated head and neck cancers.Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents the sixth most common cancer worldwide.¹ While the overall incidence of HNSCC, traditionally associated with tobacco or alcohol consumption, is declining, a subset of oropharyngeal cancers caused by infection with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) has risen significantly.^2,3 Transformation upon HPV infection occurs mainly because of inactivation of the p53 and retinoblastoma tumour suppressor proteins mediated by the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7, respectively.⁴HPV-positive (HPV⁺) cancers represent a distinct subset of HNSCC in terms of biology and clinical behaviour. In general, they are characterised by better overall survival and an improved response to conventional radio-chemotherapy (RT/CT) compared with HPV-negative (HPV⁻) cancers.^5,6 To further minimise treatment-related toxicity without compromising outcome, there have been suggestions of treatment de-escalation in conjunction with targeted therapies.⁷The novel anticancer agent TRAIL (tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) selectively kills several types of malignant cell lines with little effect on normal cells.⁸ Recombinant TRAIL or monoclonal antibodies targeting TRAIL receptors (TRAIL-Rs) are currently being tested in phase I/II clinical trials for patients with advanced tumours.^9,10 TRAIL induces cell death by binding to TRAIL-R1 or TRAIL-R2, resulting in receptor oligomerisation and formation of the death-inducing signalling complex (DISC)¹¹ and activation of initiator caspase-8.¹² Caspase-8 directly activates effector caspase-3 to induce apoptosis through the type I pathway or cleaves the BH3-only protein Bid, generating tBid. This type II pathway involves an amplification loop through the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis characterised by cytochrome c release from the mitochondria, activation of initiator caspase-9 and ultimately caspase-3.¹³Despite its tumour-selective activity, various cancer cell lines remain resistant to TRAIL, limiting the clinical potential of TRAIL-based monotherapies. Many recent studies focus on combination strategies with other agents to sensitise resistant cells to TRAIL.¹⁴ The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of multiple myeloma, but has shown only little single-agent activity in solid malignancies such as HNSCC while being effective in combination with other treatment options.^{15, 16, 17} Combining bortezomib with TRAIL-R agonists produced a synergistic cytotoxic effect in various types of cancers. Potential mechanisms underlying sensitisation to TRAIL-induced apoptosis include inhibition of NF-κB signalling, stabilisation of BH3-only proteins, p53 or p21, upregulation of TRAIL-Rs and enhanced stability of caspase-8.^{18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26}So far, little data is available on the therapeutic potential of TRAIL alone or in combination with bortezomib in HNSCC or other HPV⁺ related cancers. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 sensitised TRAIL-resistant HPV⁺ cervical cancer cells to TRAIL through p53-dependent upregulation of TRAIL-Rs and inactivation of XIAP.²⁷ Overexpression of E6 was shown to protect colon cancer cells from death receptor-induced apoptosis by affecting the stability of the DISC, indicating a functional link between the presence of E6 and TRAIL signalling.²⁸In this study, we tested the response of HPV⁺ and HPV⁻ HNSCC cells to treatment with TRAIL alone or combined with bortezomib, revealing a clear pattern of sensitivity to TRAIL depending on HPV status and a synergistic effect when combined with bortezomib. In addition, we identified some of the proteins and pathways involved in the response to TRAIL/bortezomib in HNSCCs.     

Loss of Caspase-3 sensitizes colon cancer cells to genotoxic stress via RIP1-dependent necrosis

Caspase-3 is the best known executioner caspase in apoptosis. We generated caspase-3 knockout (C3KO) and knockdown human colorectal cancer cells, and found that they are unexpectedly sensitized to DNA-damaging agents including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), etoposide, and camptothecin. C3KO xenograft tumors also displayed enhanced therapeutic response and cell death to 5-FU. C3KO cells showed intact apoptosis and activation of caspase-7 and -9, impaired processing of caspase-8, and induction of necrosis in response to DNA-damaging agents. This form of necrosis is associated with HMGB1 release and ROS production, and suppressed by genetic or pharmacological inhibition of RIP1, MLKL1, or caspase-8, but not inhibitors of pan-caspases or RIP3. 5-FU treatment led to the formation of a z-VAD-resistant pro-caspase-8/RIP1/FADD complex, which was strongly stabilized by caspase-3 KO. These data demonstrate a key role of caspase-3 in caspase-8 processing and suppression of DNA damage-induced necrosis, and provide a potentially novel way to chemosensitize cancer cells.Colorectal cancer is a major cancer killer in the United States and worldwide.¹ Chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and irinotecan (Camptosar) are commonly used in treating patients with colon cancer and other solid tumors. However, the 5-year survival of colon cancer patients with advanced diseases is <10% even with aggressive treatments.¹ Most conventional chemotherapeutic agents cause DNA damage and trigger apoptosis,² which is regulated by mitochondria-dependent intrinsic and death receptor-dependent extrinsic apoptotic pathways converging on the activation of executioner caspases-3 and -7.² During transformation, neoplastic cells frequently become resistant to apoptosis via genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, driving accumulation of additional oncogenic events, and therapeutic resistance.³ Therefore, the exploration of alternative death pathways might provide new therapeutic options.Necrosis has long been viewed as an unregulated form of cell demise that promotes inflammation and tissue damage, whereas emerging evidence indicates that some forms of necrosis are programmed.^{4, 5} They can be initiated upon activation of the extended TNF-α receptor family at the cell surface, propagated through the receptor-interacting serine–threonine kinases, RIP1 and RIP3, and actively suppressed by apoptosis.^{6, 7, 8, 9} In mice, loss of caspase-8 leads to RIP3-dependent necrosis and embryonic lethality,^{10, 11} or intestinal inflammation involving TNF-α production.^{12, 13} In HT29 colon cancer cells, the addition of pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD switches TNF-α and SMAC mimetic-induced apoptosis to RIP1/RIP3-dependent necrosis via downstream effector proteins mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) and phosphoglycerate mutase family member 5 (PGAM5).^{14, 15} Induction of programmed necrosis, or necroptosis, is stimuli- and cell type-dependent, and can also occur independent of either RIP1, RIP3,^{6, 16, 17} or both.¹⁸ The role and regulation of necrosis following DNA damage in relation to therapeutic outcomes has remained largely unexplored.^{8, 9}In the current study, we report an unexpected function of caspase-3 in suppressing necrosis triggered by DNA-damaging agents in colon cancer cells. Caspase-3 knockout (C3KO) or knockdown (KD) colon cancer cells showed normal apoptotic response, but increased sensitivities to DNA-damaging agents in cell culture and in mice, at least in part, via RIP1-, and caspase-8-dependent necrosis. Our findings provide a potentially novel approach to chemosensitize cancer cells.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.     

Stress-induced ceramide generation and apoptosis via the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1 by JNK signaling

Neutral sphingomyelinase (nSMase) activation in response to environmental stress or inflammatory cytokine stimuli generates the second messenger ceramide, which mediates the stress-induced apoptosis. However, the signaling pathways and activation mechanism underlying this process have yet to be elucidated. Here we show that the phosphorylation of nSMase1 (sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2, SMPD2) by c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling stimulates ceramide generation and apoptosis and provide evidence for a signaling mechanism that integrates stress- and cytokine-activated apoptosis in vertebrate cells. An nSMase1 was identified as a JNK substrate, and the phosphorylation site responsible for its effects on stress and cytokine induction was Ser-270. In zebrafish cells, the substitution of Ser-270 for alanine blocked the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1, whereas the substitution of Ser-270 for negatively charged glutamic acid mimicked the effect of phosphorylation. The JNK inhibitor SP600125 blocked the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1, which in turn blocked ceramide signaling and apoptosis. A variety of stress conditions, including heat shock, UV exposure, hydrogen peroxide treatment, and anti-Fas antibody stimulation, led to the phosphorylation of nSMase1, activated nSMase1, and induced ceramide generation and apoptosis in zebrafish embryonic ZE and human Jurkat T cells. In addition, the depletion of MAPK8/9 or SMPD2 by RNAi knockdown decreased ceramide generation and stress- and cytokine-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. Therefore the phosphorylation of nSMase1 is a pivotal step in JNK signaling, which leads to ceramide generation and apoptosis under stress conditions and in response to cytokine stimulation. nSMase1 has a common central role in ceramide signaling during the stress and cytokine responses and apoptosis.The sphingomyelin pathway is initiated by the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin to generate the second messenger ceramide.¹ Sphingomyelin hydrolysis is a major pathway for stress-induced ceramide generation. Neutral sphingomyelinase (nSMase) is activated by a variety of environmental stress conditions, such as heat shock,^{1, 2, 3} oxidative stress (hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), oxidized lipoproteins),¹ ultraviolet (UV) radiation,¹ chemotherapeutic agents,⁴ and β-amyloid peptides.^{5, 6} Cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α,^{7, 8, 9} interleukin (IL)-1β,¹⁰ Fas ligand,¹¹ and their associated proteins, also trigger the activation of nSMase.¹² Membrane-bound Mg²⁺-dependent nSMase is considered to be a strong candidate for mediating the effects of stress and inflammatory cytokines on ceramide.³Among the four vertebrate nSMases, nSMase1 (SMPD2) was the first to be cloned and is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus.¹³ Several studies have focused on the potential signaling roles of nSMase1, and some reports have suggested that nSMase1 is important for ceramide generation in response to stress.^{5, 6, 14, 15} In addition, nSMase1 is responsible for heat-induced apoptosis in zebrafish embryonic cultured (ZE) cells, and a loss-of-function study showed a reduction in ceramide generation, caspase-3 activation, and apoptosis in zebrafish embryos.¹⁶ However, nSMase1-knockout mice showed no lipid storage diseases or abnormalities in sphingomyelin metabolism.¹⁷ Therefore, the molecular mechanisms by which nSMase1 is activated have yet to be elucidated.Environmental stress and inflammatory cytokines^{1, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27} stimulate stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling, which involves the sequential activation of members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, including MAPK/ERK kinase kinase (MEKK)1/MAPK kinase (MKK)4, and/or SAPK/ERK kinase (SEK)1/MKK7, JNK, and c-jun. Both the JNK and sphingomyelin signaling pathways coordinately mediate the induction of apoptosis.¹ However, possible crosstalk between the JNK and sphingomyelin signaling pathways has not yet been characterized. Previously, we used SDS-PAGE to determine that nSMase1 polypeptides migrated at higher molecular masses,¹⁶ suggesting that the sphingomyelin signaling pathway might cause the production of a chemically modified phosphorylated nSMase1, which is stimulated under stressed conditions in ZE cells.¹⁶ Here, we demonstrate that JNK signaling results in the phosphorylation of Ser-270 of nSMase1, which initiates ceramide generation and apoptosis. We also provide evidence for a signaling mechanism that integrates cytokine- and stress-activated apoptosis in vertebrate cells. We studied stress-induced ceramide generation in two cell types: ZE cells and human leukemia Jurkat T-lymphoid cells. Stress-induced apoptosis has been investigated in these systems previously.^{16, 28}     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: a possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction

Neuropeptides induce signal transduction across the plasma membrane by acting through cell-surface receptors. The dynorphins, endogenous ligands for opioid receptors, are an exception; they also produce non-receptor-mediated effects causing pain and neurodegeneration. To understand non-receptor mechanism(s), we examined interactions of dynorphins with plasma membrane. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp electrophysiology, we demonstrate that dynorphins accumulate in the membrane and induce a continuum of transient increases in ionic conductance. This phenomenon is consistent with stochastic formation of giant (~2.7 nm estimated diameter) unstructured non-ion-selective membrane pores. The potency of dynorphins to porate the plasma membrane correlates with their pathogenic effects in cellular and animal models. Membrane poration by dynorphins may represent a mechanism of pathological signal transduction. Persistent neuronal excitation by this mechanism may lead to profound neuropathological alterations, including neurodegeneration and cell death.Neuropeptides are the largest and most diverse family of neurotransmitters. They are released from axon terminals and dendrites, diffuse to pre- or postsynaptic neuronal structures and activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors. Prodynorphin (PDYN)-derived opioid peptides including dynorphin A (Dyn A), dynorphin B (Dyn B) and big dynorphin (Big Dyn) consisting of Dyn A and Dyn B are endogenous ligands for the κ-opioid receptor. Acting through this receptor, dynorphins regulate processing of pain and emotions, memory acquisition and modulate reward induced by addictive substances.^{1, 2, 3, 4} Furthermore, dynorphins may produce robust cellular and behavioral effects that are not mediated through opioid receptors.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} As evident from pharmacological, morphological, genetic and human neuropathological studies, these effects are generally pathological, including cell death, neurodegeneration, neurological dysfunctions and chronic pain. Big Dyn is the most active pathogenic peptide, which is about 10- to 100-fold more potent than Dyn A, whereas Dyn B does not produce non-opioid effects.^{16, 17, 22, 25} Big Dyn enhances activity of acid-sensing ion channel-1a (ASIC1a) and potentiates ASIC1a-mediated cell death in nanomolar concentrations^{30, 31} and, when administered intrathecally, induces characteristic nociceptive behavior at femtomolar doses.^{17, 22} Inhibition of endogenous Big Dyn degradation results in pathological pain, whereas prodynorphin (Pdyn) knockout mice do not maintain neuropathic pain.^{22, 32} Big Dyn differs from its constituents Dyn A and Dyn B in its unique pattern of non-opioid memory-enhancing, locomotor- and anxiolytic-like effects.²⁵Pathological role of dynorphins is emphasized by the identification of PDYN missense mutations that cause profound neurodegeneration in the human brain underlying the SCA23 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 23), a very rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder.^{27, 33} Most PDYN mutations are located in the Big Dyn domain, demonstrating its critical role in neurodegeneration. PDYN mutations result in marked elevation in dynorphin levels and increase in its pathogenic non-opioid activity.^{27, 34} Dominant-negative pathogenic effects of dynorphins are not produced through opioid receptors.ASIC1a, glutamate NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)/kainate ion channels, and melanocortin and bradykinin B2 receptors have all been implicated as non-opioid dynorphin targets.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36} Multiplicity of these targets and their association with the cellular membrane suggest that their activation is a secondary event triggered by a primary interaction of dynorphins with the membrane. Dynorphins are among the most basic neuropeptides.^{37, 38} The basic nature is also a general property of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) and amyloid peptides that act by inducing membrane perturbations, altering membrane curvature and causing pore formation that disrupts membrane-associated processes including ion fluxes across the membrane.³⁹ The similarity between dynorphins and these two peptide groups in overall charge and size suggests a similar mode of their interactions with membranes.In this study, we dissect the interactions of dynorphins with the cell membrane, the primary event in their non-receptor actions. Using fluorescence imaging, correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp techniques, we demonstrate that dynorphin peptides accumulate in the plasma membrane in live cells and cause a profound transient increase in cell membrane conductance. Membrane poration by endogenous neuropeptides may represent a novel mechanism of signal transduction in the brain. This mechanism may underlie effects of dynorphins under pathological conditions including chronic pain and tissue injury.