A putative lipase gene EXTRA GLUME1 regulates both empty-glume fate and spikelet development in rice

Recent studies have shown that molecular control of inner floral organ identity appears to be largely conserved between monocots and dicots, but little is known regarding the molecular mechanism underlying development of the monocot outer floral organ, a unique floral structure in grasses. In this study, we report the cloning of the rice EXTRA GLUME1 ( EG1 ) gene, a putative lipase gene that specifies empty-glume fate and floral meristem determinacy. In addition to affecting the identity and number of empty glumes, mutations in EG1 caused ectopic floral organs to be formed at each organ whorl or in extra ectopic whorls. Iterative glume-like structures or new floral organ primordia were formed in the presumptive region of the carpel, resulting in an indeterminate floral meristem. EG1 is expressed strongly in inflorescence primordia and weakly in developing floral primordia. We also found that the floral meristem and organ identity gene OsLHS1 showed altered expression with respect to both pattern and levels in the eg1 mutant, and is probably responsible for the pleiotropic floral defects in eg1 . As a putative class III lipase that functionally differs from any known plant lipase, EG1 reveals a novel pathway that regulates rice empty-glume fate and spikelet development.     

Defective cell proliferation in the floral meristem of alloplasmic plants of Nicotiana tabacum leads to abnormal floral organ development and male sterility

Flowers of an alloplasmic male-sterile tobacco line, comprised of the nuclear genome of Nicotiana tabacum and the cytoplasm of Nicotiana repanda, develop short, poorly-pigmented petals and abnormal sterile stamens that often are fused with the carpel wall. The development of flower organ primordia and establishment of boundaries between the different zones in the floral meristem were investigated by performing expression analysis of the tobacco orthologs of the organ identity genes GLO, AG and DEF. These studies support the conclusion that boundary formation was impaired between the organs produced in whorls 3 and 4 resulting in partial fusions between anthers and carpels. According to the investigations cell divisions and floral meristem size in the alloplasmic line were drastically reduced in comparison with the male-fertile tobacco line. The reduction in cell divisions leads to a discrepancy between cell number and cell determination at the stage when petal and stamen primordia should be initiated. At the same stage expression of the homeotic genes was delayed in comparison with the male-fertile line. However, the abnormal organ development was not due to a failure in the spatial expression of the organ identity genes. Instead the aberrant development in the floral organs of whorls 2, 3 and 4 appears to be caused by deficient floral meristem development at an earlier stage. Furthermore, defects in cell proliferation in the floral meristem of the alloplasmic male-sterile line correlates with presence of morphologically modified mitochondria. The putative causes of reduced cell number in the floral meristem and the consequences for floral development are discussed.     

Plant meristems: <Emphasis Type="Italic">CLAVATA3/ESR</Emphasis>-related signaling in the shoot apical meristem and the root apical meristem

The plant meristems, shoot apical meristem (SAM) and root apical meristem (RAM), are unique structures made up of a self-renewing population of undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells. The SAM produces all aerial parts of postembryonic organs, and the RAM promotes the continuous growth of roots. Even though the structures of the SAM and RAM differ, the signaling components required for stem cell maintenance seem to be relatively conserved. Both meristems utilize cell-to-cell communication to maintain proper meristematic activities and meristem organization and to coordinate new organ formation. In SAM, an essential regulatory mechanism for meristem organization is a regulatory loop between WUSCHEL (WUS) and CLAVATA (CLV), which functions in a non-cell-autonomous manner. This intercellular signaling network coordinates the development of the organization center, organ boundaries and distant organs. The CLAVATA3/ESR (CLE)-related genes produce signal peptides, which act non-cell-autonomously in the meristem regulation in SAM. In RAM, it has been suggested that a similar mechanism can regulate meristem maintenance, but these functions are largely unknown. Here, we overview the WUS–CLV signaling network for stem cell maintenance in SAM and a related mechanism in RAM maintenance. We also discuss conservation of the regulatory system for stem cells in various plant species. S. Sawa is the recipient of the BSJ Award for Young Scientist, 2007.     

Mutations associated with floral organ number in rice

How floral organ number is specified is an interesting subject and has been intensively studied in Arabidopsis thaliana. In rice (Oryza sativa L.), mutations associated with floral organ number have been identified. In three mutants of rice, floral organ number 1 (fon1) and the two alleles, floral organ number 2-1 (fon2-1) and floral organ number 2-2 (fon2-2), the floral organs were increased in number centripetally. Lodicules, homologous to petals, were rarely affected, and stamens were frequently increased from six to seven or eight. Of all the floral organs the number of pistils was the most frequently increased. Among the mutants, fon1 showed a different spectrum of organ number from fon2 -1 and fon2 -2. Lodicules were the most frequently affected in fon1, but pistils of more than half of fon1 flowers were unaffected; in contrast, the pistils of most flowers were increased in fon2 -1 and fon2-2. Homeotic conversion of organ identity was also detected at a low frequency in ectopically formed lodicules and stamens. Lodicules and stamens were partially converted into anthers and stigmas, respectively. Concomitant with the increased number of floral organs, each mutant had an enlarged apical meristem. Although meristem size was comparable among the three mutants and wild type in the early phase of flower development, a significant difference became apparent after the lemma primordium had differentiated. In these mutants, the size of the shoot apical meristem in the embryo and in the vegetative phase was not affected, and no phenotypic abnormalities were detected. These results do not coincide with those for Arabidopsis in which clavatal affects the sizes of both shoot and floral meristems, leading to abnormal phyllotaxis, inflorescence fasciation and increased floral organs. Accordingly, it is considered that FON1 and FON2 function exclusively in the regulation of the floral meristem, not of the vegetative meristem.Abbreviation DIC differential interference contrast This work was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.     

Plant stem cells and their regulations in shoot apical meristems

Stem cells in plants, established during embryogenesis, are located in the centers of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) and the root apical meristem (RAM). Stem cells in SAM have a capacity to renew themselves and to produce new organs and tissues indefinitely. Although fully differentiated organs such as leaves do not contain stem cells, cells in such organs do have the capacity to re-establish new stem cells, especially under the induction of phytohormones in vitro. Cytokinin and auxin are critical in creating position signals in the SAM to maintain the stem cell organizing center and to position the new organ primordia, respectively. This review addresses the distinct features of plant stem cells and focuses on how stem cell renewal and differentiation are regulated in SAMs.     

Regulatory networks that function to specify flower meristems require the function of homeobox genes PENNYWISE and POUND-FOOLISH in Arabidopsis

Flowering is a major developmental phase change that transforms the fate of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) from a leaf-bearing vegetative meristem to that of a flower-producing inflorescence meristem. In Arabidopsis, floral meristems are specified on the periphery of the inflorescence meristem by the combined activities of the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)–FD complex and the flower meristem identity gene, LEAFY ( LFY ). Two redundant functioning homeobox genes, PENNYWISE ( PNY ) and POUND-FOOLISH ( PNF ), which are expressed in the vegetative and inflorescence SAM, regulate patterning events during reproductive development, including floral specification. To determine the role of PNY and PNF in the floral specification network, we characterized the genetic relationship of these homeobox genes with LFY and FT . Results from this study demonstrate that LFY functions downstream of PNY and PNF. Ectopic expression of LFY promotes flower formation in pny pnf plants, while the flower specification activity of ectopic FT is severely attenuated. Genetic analysis shows that when mutations in pny and pnf genes are combined with lfy , a synergistic phenotype is displayed that significantly reduces floral specification and alters inflorescence patterning events. In conclusion, results from this study support a model in which PNY and PNF promote LFY expression during reproductive development. At the same time, the flower formation activity of FT is dependent upon the function of PNY and PNF.     

Is the extent of the proliferation of component cell lineages critical during organ morphogenesis?

Shoot meristems of higher plants are composed of several clonally distinct cell lineages. Periclinal chimeras have been used to determine the fate of derivatives of these lineages in mature leaves and other organs of the plant. Fates of individual meristem cells are not rigidly fixed and the distribution of tissue derived from each meristem lineage in different regions of an organ is variable. The amount of proliferation from an individual lineage can be altered without affecting the overall morphology of organs. Mechanisms exist by which cells from several lineages coordinate their relative amounts of proliferation. The conclusion from these studies is that cell proliferation and organ morphogenesis are developmental events that can be uncoupled.     

One-leaf plants in the Gesneriaceae: Natural mutants of the typical shoot system

The aerial part of seed plants is called the shoot, which is composed of stems, leaves, and axial buds. These are produced by indeterminate activity in the shoot apical meristem (SAM), whereas the morphogenesis of leaves depends on determinate activity of leaf meristems. However, one-leaf plants in the Gesneriaceae family (eudicots) do not have a typical SAM and do not produce new organs when in the vegetative phase. Instead, they have one cotyledon whose growth is indeterminate. This peculiar development is supported by the groove meristem, which corresponds to the canonical SAM, and the basal meristem, which corresponds to the typical leaf meristem. However, the former does not produce any organ and the latter is active indeterminately. Gene expression and physiological analyses have been conducted in an effort to determine the molecular nature of this peculiar organogenesis. This review summarizes the current understanding of the development of one-leaf plants to provide future perspectives in this field of research.     

Meristem maintenance and compound-leaf patterning utilize common genetic mechanisms in tomato

Balancing shoot apical meristem (SAM) maintenance and organ formation from its flanks is essential for proper plant growth and development and for the flexibility of organ production in response to internal and external cues. Leaves are formed at the SAM flanks and display a wide variability in size and form. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaves are compound with lobed margins. We exploited 18 recessive tomato mutants, representing four distinct phenotypic classes and six complementation groups, to track the genetic mechanisms involved in meristem function and compound-leaf patterning in tomato. In goblet (gob) mutants, the SAM terminates following cotyledon production, but occasionally partially recovers and produces simple leaves. expelled shoot (exp) meristems terminate after the production of several leaves, and these leaves show a reduced level of compoundness. short pedicel (spd) mutants are bushy, with impaired meristem structure, compact inflorescences, short pedicels and less compound leaves. In multi drop (mud) mutants, the leaves are more compound and the SAM tends to divide into two active meristems after the production of a few leaves. The range of leaf-compoundness phenotypes observed in these mutants suggests that compound-leaf patterning involves an array of genetic factors, which act successively to elaborate leaf shape. Furthermore, the results indicate that similar mechanisms underlie SAM activity and compound-leaf patterning in tomato.     

Genetic analyses of signalling in flower development using Arabidopsis

Flower development can be divided into four major steps: phase transition from vegetative to reproductive growth, formation of inflorescence meristem, formation and identity determination of floral organs, and growth and maturation of floral organs. Intercellular and intracellular signalling mechanisms must have important roles in each step of flower development, because it requires cell division, cell growth, and cell differentiation in a concerted fashion. Molecular genetic analysis of the process has started by isolation of a series of mutants with unusual flowering time, with aberrant structure in inflorescence and in flowers, and with no self-fertilization. At present more than 60 genes are identified from Arabidopsis thaliana and some of them have cloned. Although the information is still limited, several types of signalling systems are revealed. In this review, we summarize the present genetic aspects of the signalling network underlying the processes of flower development.     

The pleiotropic mutation dar1 affects plant architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana

Shoot architecture is shaped upon the organogenic activity of the shoot apical meristem (SAM). Such an activity relies on the balance between the maintenance of a population of undifferentiated cells in the centre of the SAM and the recruitment of organ founder cells at the periphery. A novel mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana, distorted architecture1 (dar1), is characterised by disturbed phyllotaxy of the inflorescence and consumption of the apical meristem late in development. SEM and light microscopy analyses of the dar1 SAM reveal an abnormal partitioning of meristematic domains, and mutations known to affect the SAM structure and function were found to interact with dar1. Moreover, the mutant shows an alteration of the root apical meristem (RAM) structure. Those observations support the hypothesis that DAR1 has a role in meristem maintenance and it is required for the normal development of Arabidopsis inflorescence during plant life.     

The ULTRAPETALA gene controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis

The regulation of proper shoot and floral meristem size during plant development is mediated by a complex interaction of stem cell promoting and restricting factors. The phenotypic effects of mutations in the ULTRAPETALA gene, which is required to control shoot and floral meristem cell accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana, are described. ultrapetala flowers contain more floral organs and whorls than wild-type plants, phenotypes that correlate with an increase in floral meristem size preceding organ initiation. ultrapetala plants also produce more floral meristems than wild-type plants, correlating with an increase in inflorescence meristem size without visible fasciation. Expression analysis indicates that ULTRAPETALA controls meristem cell accumulation partly by limiting the domain of CLAVATA1 expression. Genetic studies show that ULTRAPETALA acts independently of ERA1, but has overlapping functions with PERIANTHIA and the CLAVATA signal transduction pathway in controlling shoot and floral meristem size and meristem determinacy. Thus ULTRAPETALA defines a novel locus that restricts meristem cell accumulation in Arabidopsis shoot and floral meristems.     

Type specification and spatial pattern formation of floral organs: A dynamic development model

A mathematical model simulating spatial pattern formation (positioning) of floral organs is proposed. Computer experiment with this model demonstrated the following sequence of spatial pattern formation in a typical cruciferous flower: medial sepals, carpels, lateral sepals, long stamens, petals, and short stamens. The positioning was acropetal for the perianth organs and basipetal for the stamens and carpels. Organ type specification and positioning proceed non-simultaneously in different floral parts and organ type specification goes ahead of organ spatial pattern formation. Computer simulation of flower development in several mutants demonstrated that the AG and AP2 genes determine both organ type specification and formation of the zones for future organ development. The function of the AG gene is to determine the basipetal patterning zones for the development of the reproductive organs, while the AP2 gene maintains proliferative activity of the meristem establishing the acropetal patterning zone for the development of the perianth organs.     

Embryonic shoot apical meristem formation in higher plants

The shoot apical meristem (SAM) is essential for organ formation in higher plants. How the SAM is formed during plant development is poorly understood, however. In this review, we focus on several recent studies that provide new insights into the mechanism of SAM formation during embryogenesis. Recently, positive and negative regulators of the class I KNOX genes, which are thought to be necessary for SAM formation, have been identified; the Arabidopsis CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON (CUC) genes are required for the expression of a class I KNOX gene, SHOOT MERISSTEMLES (STM) during embryogenesis, and the Arabidopsis ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1), AS2, and several other genes negatively regulate KNOX gene expression in cotyledon primordia. Also, several genes that are involved in the formation of the adaxial–abaxial axis of cotyledons seem to regulate embryonic SAM formation. Electronic Publication     

SHOOT MERISTEMLESS trafficking controls axillary meristem formation,meristem size and organ boundaries in Arabidopsis

The shoot stem cell niche, contained within the shoot apical meristem (SAM) is maintained in Arabidopsis by the homeodomain protein SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM). STM is a mobile protein that traffics cell‐to‐cell, presumably through plasmodesmata. In maize, the STM homolog KNOTTED1 shows clear differences between mRNA and protein localization domains in the SAM. However, the STM mRNA and protein localization domains are not obviously different in Arabidopsis, and the functional relevance of STM mobility is unknown. Using a non‐mobile version of STM (2xNLS‐YFP‐STM), we show that STM mobility is required to suppress axillary meristem formation during embryogenesis, to maintain meristem size, and to precisely specify organ boundaries throughout development. STM and organ boundary genes CUP SHAPED COTYLEDON1 (CUC1), CUC2 and CUC3 regulate each other during embryogenesis to establish the embryonic SAM and to specify cotyledon boundaries, and STM controls CUC expression post‐embryonically at organ boundary domains. We show that organ boundary specification by correct spatial expression of CUC genes requires STM mobility in the meristem. Our data suggest that STM mobility is critical for its normal function in shoot stem cell control.