The Active and the Inactive Form of the hAT1 Receptor Have an Identical Ligand-Binding Environment: An MPA Study on a Constitutively Active Angiotensin II Receptor Mutant

Several models of activation mechanisms were proposed for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), yet no direct methods exist for their elucidation. The availability of constitutively active mutants has given an opportunity to study active receptor conformations within acceptable limits using models such as the angiotensin II type 1 (AT₁)¹ receptor mutant N111G-hAT₁ which displays an important constitutive activity. Recently, by using methionine proximity assay, we showed for the hAT₁ receptor that TMD III, VI, and VII form the ligand-binding pocket of the C-terminal amino acid of an antagonistic AngII analogue. In the present contribution, we investigated whether the same residues would also constitute the ligand-binding contacts in constitutively activated mutant (CAM) receptors. For this purpose, the same Met mutagenesis strategy was carried out on the N111G double mutants. Analysis of 43 receptors mutants in the N111G-hAT₁ series, photolabeled and CNBr digested, showed that there were only subtle structural changes between the wt-receptor and its constitutively active form.     

Manifold active-state conformations in GPCRs: agonist-activated constitutively active mutant AT1 receptor preferentially couples to Gq compared to the wild-type AT1 receptor

The angiotensin II type I (AT(1)) receptor mediates regulation of blood pressure and water-electrolyte balance by Ang II. Substitution of Gly for Asn(111) of the AT(1) receptor constitutively activates the receptor leading to Gq-coupled IP(3) production independent of Ang II binding. The Ang II-activated conformation of the AT1(N111G) receptor was proposed to be similar to that of the wild-type AT(1) receptor, although, various aspects of the Ang II-induced conformation of this constitutively active mutant receptor have not been systematically studied. Here, we provide evidence that the conformation of the active state of the wild-type and the constitutively active AT(1) receptors are different. Upon Ang II binding an activated conformation of the wild-type AT(1) receptor activates G protein and recruits beta-arrestin. In contrast, the agonist-bound AT1(N111G) mutant receptor preferentially couples to Gq and is inadequate in beta-arrestin recruitment.     

Down-regulation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in cells stably expressing the constitutively active angiotensin II N111G-AT(1) receptor

The diverse cellular changes brought about by the expression of a constitutively active receptor are poorly understood. QBI-human embryonic kidney 293A cells stably expressing the constitutively active N111G-AT(1) receptor (N111G cells) showed elevated levels of inositol phosphates and frequent spontaneous intracellular Ca(2+) oscillations. Interestingly, Ca(2+) transients triggered with maximal doses of angiotensin II were much weaker in N111G cells than in wild-type cells. These blunted responses were observed independently of the presence or absence of extracellular Ca(2+) and were also obtained when endogenous muscarinic and purinergic receptors were activated, revealing a heterologous desensitization process. The desensitized component of the Ca(2+) signaling cascade was neither the G protein G(q) nor phospholipase C. The intracellular Ca(2+) store of N111G cells and their mechanism of Ca(2+) entry also appeared to be intact. The most striking adaptive response of N111G cells was a down-regulation of their inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP(3)R) as revealed by reduced IP(3)-induced Ca(2+) release, lowered [(3)H]IP(3) binding capacity, diminished IP(3)R immunoreactivity, and accelerated IP(3)R degradation involving the lysosomal pathway. Treatment with the inverse agonist EXP3174 reversed the desensitized phenotype of N111G cells. Down-regulation of IP(3)R represents a reversible adaptive response to protect cells against the adverse effects of constitutively active Ca(2+)-mobilizing receptors.     

Constitutive activation and endocytosis of the complement factor 5a receptor: evidence for multiple activated conformations of a G protein-coupled receptor

Serpentine receptors relay hormonal or sensory stimuli to heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). In most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), binding of the agonist ligand elicits both stimulation of the G protein and endocytosis of the receptor. We have begun to address whether these responses reflect the same sets of conformational changes in the receptor using constitutively active mutants of the human complement factor 5a receptor (C5aR). Two different mutant receptors both constitutively activate G protein-mediated responses, but one (F251A) is endocytosed only in response to ligand stimulation, while the other (NQ) is constitutively internalized in the absence of ligand. Both the constitutive and ligand-dependent endocytosis are accompanied by recruitment of beta-arrestin to the receptor. An inactivating mutation (N296A) complements the NQ mutation, producing a receptor that is activated only upon exposure to agonist; this revertant receptor (NQ/N296A) is nevertheless constitutively endocytosed. Thus one mutant (F251A) requires agonist for triggering endocytosis but not for activation of the downstream G protein signal, while another (NQ/N296A) behaves in the opposite fashion. Dissociation of two responses normally dependent on agonist binding indicates that the corresponding functions of an activated GPCR reflect different sets of changes in the receptor's conformation .     

The constitutively active N111G-AT1 receptor for angiotensin II modifies the morphology and cytoskeletal organization of HEK-293 cells

The expression of a constitutively active G protein-coupled receptor is expected to trigger diverse cellular changes ranging from normal to adaptive responses. We report that confluent HEK-293 cells stably expressing the constitutively active mutant N111G-AT1 receptor for angiotensin II spontaneously exhibited dramatic morphological changes and cytoskeletal reorganization. Phase-contrast microscopy revealed that these cells formed a dense monolayer, whereas cells expressing the WT-AT1 receptor displayed large intercellular spaces and numerous filopodia. Confocal microscopy revealed an elaborate web of polymerized actin at the apical and basolateral surfaces of cells expressing the N111G-AT1 receptor. Interestingly, these phenotypic changes were prevented by culturing the cells in the presence of the inverse agonist EXP3174. Similar morphologic rearrangements and de novo polymerized actin structures were found in Ang II-stimulated cells expressing the WT-AT1 receptor. We further showed that AT1 receptor-induced cell-cell contact formation did not require an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration or the activity of protein kinase C. However, pretreatment with Y-27632 revealed that Rho-kinase activity was required for cell-cell contact formation upon AT1 receptor activation. These observations demonstrate that the expression of the constitutively active mutant N111G-AT1 receptor had a significant impact on the morphology and cytoskeletal organization of HEK-293 cells, possibly via a mechanism involving the activity of Rho-kinase.     

The AT1A receptor "gain-of-function" mutant N111S/delta329 is both constitutively active and hyperreactive to angiotensin II

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is central to cardiovascular and renal physiology. However, there is no animal model in which the activation of the RAAS only reflects the activation of the angiotensin II (ANG II) AT1 receptor. As a first step to developing such a model, we characterized a gain-of-function mutant of the mouse AT1A receptor. This mutant carries two mutations: N111S predicted to activate the receptor constitutively and a COOH-terminal deletion, delta329, expected to reduce receptor internalization and desensitization. We expressed this double mutant (AT1A-N111S/delta329) in heterologous cells. It showed a pharmacological profile consistent with that of other constitutively active mutants. Furthermore, it increased basal production of inositol phosphates, as well as basal cytosolic and nuclear ERK activities. Basal proliferation of cells expressing the mutant was also greater than that of the wild type. The double mutant was poorly internalized and failed to recruit beta-arrestin 2 in the presence of ANG II. It also showed hypersensitive and hyperreactive responses to ANG II for both inositol phosphate production and ERK activation. The additivity of the phenotypes of the two mutations makes this mutant an appropriate candidate to test the physiological consequences of the AT1A receptor activation itself in transgenic animal models.     

Analysis of the third transmembrane domain of the human type 1 angiotensin II receptor by cysteine scanning mutagenesis

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TMD) following agonist binding. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which is a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TMD helices. Using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method, we identified the residues within the third TMD of the wild-type angiotensin II (AT1) receptor that contribute to the formation of the binding site pocket. Each residue within the Ile103-Tyr127 region was mutated one at a time to a cysteine. Treating the A104C, N111C, and L112C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA) strongly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD3 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active AT1 receptor. Indeed, two additional mutants (S109C and V116C) were found to be sensitive to MTSEA treatment. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT1 receptor causes a minor counterclockwise rotation of TMD3, thereby exposing residues, which are not present in the inactive state, to the binding pocket. This pattern of accessibility of residues in the TMD3 of the AT1 receptor parallels that of homologous residues in rhodopsin. This study identified key elements of TMD3 that contribute to the activation of class A G protein-coupled receptors through structural rearrangements.     

Interacting residues in an activated state of a G protein-coupled receptor

Ste2p, the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for the tridecapeptide pheromone alpha-factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, was used as a model GPCR to investigate the role of specific residues in the resting and activated states of the receptor. Using a series of biological and biochemical analyses of wild-type and site-directed mutant receptors, we identified Asn(205) as a potential interacting partner with the Tyr(266) residue. An N205H/Y266H double mutant showed pH-dependent functional activity, whereas the N205H receptor was non-functional and the Y266H receptor was partially active indicating that the histidine 205 and 266 residues interact in an activated state of the receptor. The introduction of N205K or Y266D mutations into the P258L/S259L constitutively active receptor suppressed the constitutive activity; in contrast, the N205K/Y266D/P258L/S259L quadruple mutant was fully constitutively active, again indicating an interaction between residues at the 205 and 206 positions in the receptor-active state. To further test this interaction, we introduced the N205C/Y266C, F204C/Y266C, and N205C/A265C double mutations into wild-type and P258L/S259L constitutively active receptors. After trypsin digestion, we found that a disulfide-cross-linked product, with the molecular weight expected for a receptor fragment with a cross-link between N205C and Y266C, formed only in the N205C/Y266C constitutively activated receptor. This study represents the first experimental demonstration of an interaction between specific residues in an active state, but not the resting state, of Ste2p. The information gained from this study should contribute to an understanding of the conformational differences between resting and active states in GPCRs.     

Constitutive internalization of constitutively active agiotensin II AT(1A) receptor mutants is blocked by inverse agonists.

As constitutively active mutants (CAMs) mimic an active conformation, they can be used to characterize the process of G protein-coupled receptor activation. Here, we used CAMs to study the link between activation and internalization of the angiotensin II AT(1A) receptor. The cellular localization of fluorescently tagged N111A, I245T, and L305Q mutants was determined by confocal microscopy. In the absence of ligand, CAMs were mostly located in intracellular vesicles, whereas the wild-type AT(1A) was found at the cell surface. After 2 h incubation with inverse agonist, losartan, CAMs were translocated to the plasma membrane. Similar observations were made in H295, a human adrenocortical cell line which expresses physiologically the AT(1) receptor. This phenomenon, which was not dependent on protein synthesis and the pharmacology and kinetics of which were similar to the recycling of the wild-type receptor, was called "externalization". After externalization and losartan removal, the L305Q CAM underwent rapid ligand-independent endocytosis, with the same kinetics and temperature sensitivity as the angiotensin II-induced internalization of the wild-type AT(1A). Moreover, the addition of a second mutation known to block internalization (Delta 329 truncation) prevented intracellular localization of the CAM. These data show that AT(1A) CAMs are constitutively and permanently internalized and recycled. This mechanism is different from the down-regulation observed for CAMs of other G protein-coupled receptors and thus defines a new paradigm for the cellular regulation of CAMs.     

Agonist-induced phosphorylation of the angiotensin II (AT(1A)) receptor requires generation of a conformation that is distinct from the inositol phosphate-signaling state

G protein-coupled receptors are thought to isomerize between distinct inactive and active conformations, an idea supported by receptor mutations that induce constitutive (agonist-independent) activation. The agonist-promoted active state initiates signaling and, presumably, is then phosphorylated and internalized to terminate the signal. In this study, we examined the phosphorylation and internalization of wild type and constitutively active mutants (N111A and N111G) of the type 1 (AT(1A)) angiotensin II receptor. Cells expressing these receptors were stimulated with angiotensin II (AngII) and [Sar(1),Ile(4),Ile(8)]AngII, an analog that only activates signaling through the constitutive receptors. Wild type AT(1A) receptors displayed a basal level of phosphorylation, which was stimulated by AngII. Unexpectedly, the constitutively active AT(1A) receptors did not exhibit an increase in basal phosphorylation nor was phosphorylation enhanced by AngII stimulation. Phosphorylation of the constitutively active receptors was unaffected by pretreatment with the non-peptide AT(1) receptor inverse agonist, EXP3174, and was not stimulated by the selective ligand, [Sar(1),Ile(4),Ile(8)]AngII. Paradoxically, [Sar(1),Ile(4), Ile(8)]AngII produced a robust ( approximately 85% of AngII), dose-dependent phosphorylation of the wild type AT(1A) receptor at sites in the carboxyl terminus similar to those phosphorylated by AngII. Moreover, internalization of both wild type and constitutive receptors was induced by AngII, but not [Sar(1),Ile(4),Ile(8)]AngII, providing a differentiation between the phosphorylated and internalized states. These data suggest that the AT(1A) receptor can attain a conformation for phosphorylation without going through the conformation required for inositol phosphate signaling and provide evidence for a transition of the receptor through multiple states, each associated with separate stages of receptor activation and regulation. Separate transition states may be a common paradigm for G protein-coupled receptors.     

Constitutive activation of the opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptor by mutation of Asn133 to tryptophan in the third transmembrane region

We have introduced a series of point mutations into the human opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptor and characterized them for their ability to constitutively activate G protein-coupled receptor signalling pathways. Among the 12 mutants generated, mutation at Asn133 (N133W) gave increased basal signalling through three separate pathways. N133W increased the basal activity of G14- and G16-dependent pathways by two- to three-fold. The constitutive activity of the mutant was confirmed by the finding that the enhanced activity is dependent on the level of receptor expression. In HEK-293 cells stably expressing N133W, signalling through Gi/o-dependent pathways was also observed. Radioligand binding studies revealed that the affinity for nociceptin of the wild-type ORL1 receptor and the N133W mutant do not differ significantly, suggesting that the ligand binding and signalling functions of constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors are not necessarily intrinsically linked. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that a mutation in the third transmembrane domain is able to increase the basal signalling activity of the human ORL1 receptor.     

Direct assessment of CXCR4 mutant conformations reveals complex link between receptor structure and G(alpha)(i) activation

Ligand binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is thought to induce changes in receptor conformation that translate into activation of downstream effectors. The link between receptor conformation and activity is still insufficiently understood, as current models of GPCR activation fail to take an increasing amount of experimental data into account. To elucidate structure-function relationships in GPCR activation, we used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to directly assess the conformation of mutants of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. We analyzed substitutions in the arginine cage DRY motif and in the conserved asparagine N(3.35)119, which are pivotal molecular switches for receptor conformation and activation. G(alpha)(i) activation of the mutants was either similar to wild-type CXCR4 (D133N, Y135A, and N119D) or resulted in loss of activity (R134A and N119K). Mutant N119S was constitutively active but further activated by agonist. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis suggested no simple correlation between conformational changes in response to ligand binding and activation of G(alpha)(i) by the mutants. Different conformations of active receptors were detected (for wild-type CXCR4, D133N, and N119S), suggesting that different receptor conformations are able to trigger G(alpha)(i) activity. Several conformations were also found for inactive mutants. These data provide biophysical evidence for different receptor conformations being active with respect to a single readout. They support models of GPCR structure-activity relationships that take this conformational flexibility of active receptors into account.     

The Fifth Transmembrane Domain of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Participates in the Formation of the Ligand-binding Pocket and Undergoes a Counterclockwise Rotation upon Receptor Activation

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the angiotensin II Type 1 (AT₁) receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein- coupled receptors, the AT₁ receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. The role of the fifth transmembrane domain (TMD5) was investigated using the substituted cysteine accessibility method. All of the residues within Thr-190 to Leu-217 region were mutated one at a time to cysteine, and after expression in COS-7 cells, the mutant receptors were treated with the sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA). MTSEA reacts selectively with water-accessible, free sulfhydryl groups of endogenous or introduced point mutation cysteines. If a cysteine is found in the binding pocket, the covalent modification will affect the binding kinetics of the ligand. MTSEA substantially decreased the binding affinity of L197C-AT₁, N200C-AT₁, I201C-AT₁, G203C-AT₁, and F204C-AT₁ mutant receptors, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT₁ receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD5 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active N111G-AT₁ receptor background. Indeed, mutant I201C-N111G-AT₁ became more sensitive to MTSEA, whereas mutant G203C-N111G-AT₁ lost some sensitivity. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of AT₁ receptor causes an apparent counterclockwise rotation of TMD5 as viewed from the extracellular side.     

Molecular mechanisms of constitutive activity: mutations at position 111 of the angiotensin AT1 receptor.

A possible molecular mechanism for the constitutive activity of mutants of the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1) at position 111 was suggested by molecular modeling. This involves a cascade of conformational changes in spatial positions of side chains along transmembrane helix (TM3) from L112 to Y113 to F117, which in turn, results in conformational changes in TM4 (residues I152 and M155) leading to the movement of TM4 as a whole. The mechanism is consistent with the available data of site-directed mutagenesis, as well as with correct predictions of constitutive activity of mutants L112F and L112C. It was also predicted that the double mutant N111G/L112A might possess basal constitutive activity comparable with that of the N111G mutant, whereas the double mutants N111G/Y113A, N111G/F117A, and N111G/I152A would have lower levels of basal activity. Experimental studies of the above double mutants showed significant constitutive activity of N111G/L112A and N111G/F117A. The basal activity of N111G/I152A was higher than expected, and that of N111G/Y113A was not determined due to poor expression of the mutant. The proposed mechanism of constitutive activity of the AT(1) receptor reveals a novel nonsimplistic view on the general problem of constitutive activity, and clearly demonstrates the inherent complexity of the process of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation.     

Novel mutants of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor reveal amino acids relevant for receptor activation

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors like the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor results in conformational changes that ultimately lead to signal propagation through a G protein to an effector like adenylyl cyclase. In this study we identified amino acids that seem to be critical for activation of the human beta(1)-adrenergic receptor. Activation patterns of mutant receptors were analyzed using two structurally different ligands for beta-adrenergic receptors that both are mixed agonist/antagonists. Broxaterol and terbutaline are agonists at beta(2)- and beta(3)-receptors; however, they act as antagonists at the beta(1)-subtype. We reasoned that this functional selectivity may be reflected by a corresponding sequence pattern in the receptor subtypes. Therefore, we exchanged single amino acids of the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor for residues that were identical in the beta(2)- and beta(3)-subtypes but different in the beta(1)-receptor. Pharmacological characterization of such receptor mutants revealed that binding of a panel of agonists and antagonists including broxaterol and terbutaline was unaltered. However, two of the mutants (I185V and D212N) were activated by broxaterol and terbutaline, which acted as antagonists at the wild-type receptor. Two additional mutants (V120L and K253R) could be activated by terbutaline alone, which is structurally more closely related to endogenous catecholamines like epinephrine than to broxaterol. A model of the human beta(1)-adrenergic receptor showed that the four gain-of-function mutations are outside of the putative ligand-binding domain substantiating the lack of an effect of the mutations on binding characteristics. These results support the notion that Val-120, Ile-185, Asp-212, and Lys-253 are critically involved in conformational changes occurring during receptor activation.     

Constitutively active G protein-coupled receptor mutants block dictyostelium development

cAR1, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for cAMP, is required for the multicellular development of Dictyostelium. The activation of multiple pathways by cAR1 is transient because of poorly defined adaptation mechanisms. To investigate this, we used a genetic screen for impaired development to isolate four dominant-negative cAR1 mutants, designated DN1-4. The mutant receptors inhibit multiple cAR1-mediated responses known to undergo adaptation. Reduced in vitro adenylyl cyclase activation by GTPgammaS suggests that they cause constitutive adaptation of this and perhaps other pathways. In addition, the DN mutants are constitutively phosphorylated, which normally requires cAMP binding and possess cAMP affinities that are approximately 100-fold higher than that of wild-type cAR1. Two independent activating mutations, L100H and I104N, were identified. These residues occupy adjacent positions near the cytoplasmic end of the receptor's third transmembrane helix and correspond to the (E/D)RY motif of numerous mammalian GPCRs, which is believed to regulate their activation. Taken together, these findings suggest that the DN mutants are constitutively activated and block development by turning on natural adaptation mechanisms.     

Constitutively active mutants of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor: role of highly conserved polar amino acids in receptor activation.

Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor (AR) were combined to explore the potential molecular changes correlated with the transition from R (inactive state) to R (active state). Using molecular dynamics analysis we compared the structural/dynamic features of constitutively active mutants with those of the wild type and of an inactive alpha 1B-AR to build a theoretical model which defines the essential features of R and R. The results of site-directed mutagenesis were in striking agreement with the predictions of the model supporting the following hypothesis. (i) The equilibrium between R and R depends on the equilibrium between the deprotonated and protonated forms, respectively, of D142 of the DRY motif. In fact, replacement of D142 with alanine confers high constitutive activity to the alpha 1B-AR. (ii) The shift of R143 of the DRY sequence out of a conserved 'polar pocket' formed by N63, D91, N344 and Y348 is a feature common to all the active structures, suggesting that the role of R143 is fundamental for mediating receptor activation. Disruption of these intramolecular interactions by replacing N63 with alanine constitutively activates the alpha 1B-AR. Our findings might provide interesting generalities about the activation process of G protein-coupled receptors.     

Dominant-negative activity of an alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor signal-inactivating point mutation

alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(1)-ARs) are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and activate inositol phosphate (IP) turnover. We show that glycine and asparagine mutations of Phe303 in transmembrane segment VI (TMVI) of the alpha(1B)-AR, a highly conserved residue in GPCRs, although increasing agonist affinity, abolish agonist-activated IP signalling. Co-expression of the Phe303 mutants also inhibited (-)epinephrine-stimulated IP signalling by wild-type alpha(1B)-AR and other G(q)-coupled receptors, as well as IP signalling mediated by AlF(4)(-) stimulation of both wild-type G(q alpha) and a constitutively active mutant. The inability of the Phe303 mutants to signal is due to induction of a receptor conformation that dissociates G-protein binding from activation. As a result, the Phe303 mutants sequester G(q alpha) and stoichiometrically inhibit Gq signalling in a dominant-negative manner. We further show that both the enhanced basal and agonist-stimulated IP-signalling activity of the constitutively active alpha(1B)-AR mutants, C128F and A293E, are inhibited in the double mutants, C128F/F303G and A293E/F303G. Phe303, therefore, appears to be critically involved in coupling TMVI alpha-helical movement, a key step in receptor activation, to activation of the cognate G-protein.     

Activation of the luteinizing hormone receptor following substitution of Ser-277 with selective hydrophobic residues in the ectodomain hinge region

Glycoprotein hormone receptors are G protein-coupled receptors with ligand-binding ectodomains consisting of leucine-rich repeats. The ectodomain is connected by a conserved cysteine-rich hinge region to the seven transmembrane (TM) region. Gain-of-function mutants of luteinizing hormone (LH) and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptors found in patients allowed identification of residues important for receptor activation. Based on constitutively active mutations at Ser-281 in the hinge region of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor, we mutated the conserved serine in the LH (S277I) and follicle-stimulating hormone receptors (S273I) and observed increased basal cAMP production and ligand affinity by mutant receptors. For the LH receptor, conversion of Ser-277 to all natural amino acids led to varying degrees of receptor activation. Hydropathy index analysis indicated that substitution of neutral serine with selective nonpolar hydrophobic residues (Leu>Val>Met>Ile) confers constitutive receptor activation whereas serine deletion or substitution with charged Arg, Lys, or Asp led to defective receptor expression. Furthermore, mutation of the angular proline near Ser-273 to flexible Gly also led to receptor activation. The findings suggest the ectodomain of glycoprotein hormone receptors constrain the TM region. Point mutations in the hinge region of these proteins, or ligand binding to these receptors, could cause conformational changes in the TM region that result in G(s) activation.     

Activation and inhibition of erythropoietin receptor function: role of receptor dimerization.

Members of the cytokine receptor superfamily have structurally similar extracellular ligand-binding domains yet diverse cytoplasmic regions lacking any obvious catalytic domains. Many of these receptors form ligand-induced oligomers which are likely to participate in transmembrane signaling. A constitutively active (factor-independent) mutant of the erythropoietin receptor (EPO-R), R129C in the exoplasmic domain, forms disulfide-linked homodimers, suggesting that the wild-type EPO-R is activated by ligand-induced homodimerization. Here, we have taken two approaches to probe the role EPO-R dimerization plays in signal transduction. First, on the basis of the crystal structure of the ligand-bound, homodimeric growth hormone receptor (GH-R) and sequence alignment between the GH-R and EPO-R, we identified residues of the EPO-R which may be involved in intersubunit contacts in an EPO-R homodimer. Residue 129 of the EPO-R corresponds to a residue localized to the GH-R dimer interface region. Alanine or cysteine substitutions were introduced at four other residues of the EPO-R predicted to be in the dimer interface region. Substitution of residue E-132 or E-133 with cysteine renders the EPO-R constitutively active. Like the arginine-to-cysteine mutation at position 129 in the exoplasmic domain (R129C), E132C and E133C form disulfide-linked homodimers, suggesting that constitutive activity is due to covalent dimerization. In the second approach, we have coexpressed the wild-type EPO-R with inactive mutants of the receptor missing all or part of the cytosolic domain. These truncated receptors have a dominant inhibitory effect on the proliferative action of the wild-type receptor. Taken together, these results strengthen the hypothesis that an initial step in EPO- and EPO-R-mediated signal transduction is ligand-induced receptor dimerization.