Neural crest cell behavior in white and dark larvae of Ambystoma mexicanum: differences in cell morphology, arrangement, and extracellular matrix as related to migration

Melanocytes of white (d/d) larvae of the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) are confined to the dorsal midline of the trunk region, whereas in dark (D/-) larvae they are spread laterally on the flank as well, where they contribute to the normal pigment pattern of the trunk. Pigment cell migration in the subepidermal space of white larvae is inhibited by the white epidermis (Dalton '50; Keller et al., '82). The present scanning electron microscopic study describes a well-defined sequence of changes in shape and arrangement of neural crest cells during and after their segregation from the neural tube in both dark and white axolotls. The morphology of the neural crest cells migrating in the subepidermal pathway of dark larvae is correlated with their motile behavior and pattern of migration in vivo, as described by time-lapse cinemicrography (Keller and Spieth, '83). Also, the structures of the matrix material in the subepidermal space of dark and white axolotls differ in ways that may be related to the epidermal inhibition of migration in the latter. Numerous possibilities for contact guidance offered by the structure and topography of the substrata, neighboring cells, and the extracellular matrix in the migration path are described and discussed.     

Effects of fetal bovine serum and serum-free conditions on white and dark axolotl neural crest explants

Summary Neural crest cells from both white mutant and dark (wildtype) axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum) were cultured in increasing concentrations of fetal bovine serum (FBS; 2 to 20%). For each explant, the total number of cells that migrated and the percent of differentiated melanophores were recorded. At concentrations of FBS above 2% melanophore differentiation was essentially equivalent (32 to 59%) for both the white and dark neural crest cultures, but subtle differences in cell behavior and differentiation were found between the two phenotypes. By contrast there was a significant difference in the percent melanization of cells in serum-free control cultures, wherein melanophore differentiation in dark neural crest cultures was, on average, 18% compared to 5% in white cultures. Thus, contrary to all previously published work, white and dark neural crest cells are not intrinsically equivalent. Our culture results are discussed with regard to the probable in vivo conditions that cause the white phenotype. This research was supported by grant AR 34478 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and a University of Kansas Biomedical Science support grant.     

Cellular Plasticity Among Axolotl Neural Crest-Derived Pigment Cell Lineages

Many of the factors and mechanisms guiding the migration/differentiation of neural crest cells that give rise to a number of distinguishable cell types, including all dermal and epidermal pigment cells, remain unknown. The axolotl possesses three pigment cell types that differentiate according to specific developmentally programmed sequences and contribute to pigment pattern in the adult. A single lineage of the crest that becomes restricted to one of three pigment cell types gives us the opportunity to examine the existence of a neural crest stem cell population and the potential for transdifferentiation events. Interpretations of experiments involving drug-treated and mutant axolotls implicate cellular plasticity leading to observed phenotypes. We present results from recent in vitro studies designed to identify parameters influencing differentiation events of individual neural crest-derived pigment cell lineages. We demonstrate that the differentiation of xanthophores is enhanced, while that of the melanophores are inhibited in guanosine-supplemented neural crest cell cultures. Data suggest that the increase in one pigment cell population is at the expense of another, indicative of cellular plasticity. Videomicroscopy used in this study agrees with an abundance of correlative evidence supporting the hypothesis of transdifferentiation events among neural crest-derived pigment cell populations. The embryonic neural crest-derived pigment cell system is an ideal model to study differentiation of multipotential stem cells that play critical roles in patterning.     

Analysis of migratory behavior of neural crest and fibroblastic cells in embryonic tissues

The precise migration of neural crest cells is apparently controlled by their environment. We have examined whether the embryonic tissue spaces in which crest cells normally migrate are sufficient to account for the pattern of crest cell distribution and whether other migratory cells could also distribute themselves along these pathways. To this end, we grafted a variety of cell types into the initial crest cell migratory pathway in chicken embryos. These cell types included (a) undifferentiated neural crest cells isolated from cultured neural tubes, intact crest from cranial neural folds, and crest derivatives (pigment cells and spinal ganglia); (b) normal embryonic fibroblastic cells from somite, limb bud, lateral plate, and heart ventricle; and (c) a transformed fibroblastic cell line (Sarcoma 180). Crest cells or their derivatives grafted into the crest migratory pathway all distributed normally, although in contrast to the result when neural tubes were graftedin situ, fewer cells were observed in the epithelium and few or none were localized in the nascent spinal ganglia. Grafted quail somite cells contributed to normal somitic structures and did not migrate extensively in the chicken host. Other fibroblasts did not migrate along cranial or trunk crest pathways, or invade adjacent tissues, but remained intact at the graft site. Sarcoma 180 cells, however, distributed themselves along the normal trunk crest pathway. Cranial and trunk crest cells and crest derivatives grafted ectopically in the limb bud or somite also dispersed, and were found along the ventral migratory pathway. Fibroblastic cells grafted into ectopic sites again remained intact and did not invade host tissue. We conclude (1) that neural crest cells and their derivatives are highly motile and invasive in their normal pathway, as well as in unfamiliar embryonic environments; and (2) that the crest pathway does not act solely to direct neural crest cells, since at least one transformed cell can follow the crest migratory route.     

Genetic analysis of steel and the PG-M/versican-encoding gene AxPG as candidates for the white (d) pigmentation mutant in the salamander Ambystoma mexicanum

 Vertebrate non-retinal pigment cells are derived from neural crest (NC) cells, and several mutations have been identified in the Mexican axolotl Ambystoma mexicanum (Ambystomatidae) that affect the development of these cell lineages. In ”white” (d) mutant axolotls, premigratory NC cells differentiate as pigment cells, yet fail to disperse, survive, or both, and this leads to a nearly complete absence of pigment cells in the skin. Previous studies revealed that d affects pigment cell development non-autonomously, and have reported differences between white and wild-type axolotls in the structure and composition of the extracellular matrix through which NC and pigment cells migrate. Here we test the correspondence of d and two candidate genes: steel and AxPG. In amniotes, Steel encodes the cytokine Steel factor (mast cell growth factor; stem cell factor; kit ligand), which is expressed along the migratory pathways of melanocyte precursors and is required by these cells for their migration and survival; mammalian Steel mutants resemble white mutant axolotls in having a deficit or complete absence of pigment cells. In contrast, AxPG encodes aPG-M/versican-like proteoglycan that may promote the migration of A. mexicanum pigment cells, and AxPGexpression is reduced in white mutant axolotls. We cloned a salamander orthologue of steel and used a partial genetic linkage map of Ambystoma to determine the genomic locations of steel, AxPG, and d. We show that the three genes map to different linkage groups, excluding steel and AxPG as candidates for d. Received: 11 November 1998 / Accepted: 30 January 1999     

A novel antigen is shared by retinal pigment epithelium and pigmented neural crest

 Pigment cells in vertebrate embryos are formed in both the central and peripheral nervous system. The neural crest, a largely pluripotent population of precursor cells derived from the embryonic neural tube, gives rise to pigment cells which migrate widely in head and trunk.The retinal pigment epithelium is derived from the optic cup, which arises from ectoderm of the neural tube. We have generated an antibody, ips6, which stains an antigen common to pigment cells of retinal pigment epithelium and neural crest. Ips6 stains retinal pigment epithelium and choroid as well as a subset of crest cells that migrate in pathways typical of melanoblasts. Immunoreactivity is seen first in the eye and later in a subset of migrating crest cells. Crest cells in the amphibian embryo migrate along specific, stereotyped routes; ips6 immunoreactive cells are found in some but not all of these pathways. In older wild-type embryos, cells expressing ips6 appear coincident with pigment-containing cells in the flank, head, eye and embryonic gut. In older animals, staining in the eye extends to the intraretinal segment of optic nerve and interstices between photoreceptors and cells at the retinal periphery. We suggest that the ips6 antibody defines an antigen common to pigment cells of central and peripheral origin. Received: 22 January 1996/Accepted: 15 July 1996     

The endoderm plays an important role in patterning the segmented pharyngeal region in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

The development of the vertebrate head is a highly complex process involving tissues derived from all three germ layers. The endoderm forms pharyngeal pouches, the paraxial mesoderm gives rise to endothelia and muscles, and the neural crest cells, which originate from the embryonic midbrain and hindbrain, migrate ventrally to form cartilage, connective tissue, sensory neurons, and pigment cells. All three tissues form segmental structures: the hindbrain compartmentalizes into rhombomeres, the mesoderm into somitomeres, and the endoderm into serial gill slits. It is not known whether the different segmented tissues in the head develop by the same molecular mechanism or whether different pathways are employed. It is also possible that one tissue imposes segmentation on the others. Most recent studies have emphasized the importance of neural crest cells in patterning the head. Neural crest cells colonize the segmentally arranged arches according to their original position in the brain and convey positional information from the hindbrain into the periphery. During the screen for mutations that affect embryonic development of zebrafish, one mutant, called van gogh (vgo), in which segmentation of the pharyngeal region is absent, was isolated. In vgo, even though hindbrain segmentation is unaffected, the pharyngeal endoderm does not form reiterated pouches and surrounding mesoderm is not patterned correctly. Accordingly, migrating neural crest cells initially form distinct streams but fuse when they reach the arches. This failure to populate distinct pharyngeal arches is likely due to the lack of pharyngeal pouches. The results of our analysis suggest that the segmentation of the endoderm occurs without signaling from neural crest cells but that tissue interactions between the mesendoderm and the neural crest cells are required for the segmental appearance of the neural crest-derived cartilages in the pharyngeal arches. The lack of distinct patches of neural crest cells in the pharyngeal region is also seen in mutants of one-eyed pinhead and casanova, which are characterized by a lack of endoderm, as well as defects in mesodermal structures, providing evidence for the important role of the endoderm and mesoderm in governing head segmentation.     

Distribution of latex beads and retinal pigment epithelial cells along the ventral neural crest pathway

Neural crest cells migrate along defined pathways in the trunk of avian embryos. Previous studies have demonstrated that crest-derived pigment cells migrated ventrally after injection onto the ventral neural crest pathway (M. E. Bronner-Fraser and A. M. Cohen, 1980, Develop. Biol.77, 130–141). In the present study, latex polystyrene beads and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells were injected onto the ventral pathway in order to probe the environment along this migratory route. Although the RPE cells are nonmotile and not derived from the neural crest, they also translocated ventrally. Thus, factors independent of active migration may affect the localization of RPE cells (and endogenous crest cells). To test this possibility, latex polystyrene beads were injected onto the ventral pathway. Three types of beads were used: (a) uncoated latex beads; (b) latex beads coated with bovine serum albumin (BSA-beads); and (c) latex beads coated with fibronectin (FN-beads). Uncoated and BSA-beads distributed along the ventral pathway similarly to RPE cells and endogenous crest cells. However, FN-beads remained near the site of implantation and did not move ventrally. The results suggest (1) that molecules like fibronectin on the cell surface might serve as a recognition mechanism that prevents entrance onto the ventral pathway; and (2) that crest cell localization may, in part, be influenced by a driving force imparted by the embryonic environment.     

Regional differences in neural crest morphogenesis

Neural crest cells are pluripotent cells that emerge from the neural epithelium, migrate extensively and differentiate into numerous derivatives, including neurons, glial cells, pigment cells and connective tissue. Major questions concerning their morphogenesis include: (1) what establishes the pathways of migration? And (2), what controls the final destination and differentiation of various neural crest subpopulations? These questions will be addressed in this Review. Neural crest cells from the trunk level have been explored most extensively. Studies show that melanoblasts are specified shortly after they depart from the neural tube and this specification directs their migration into the dorsolateral pathway. We also consider other reports that present strong evidence for ventrally migrating neural crest cells being similarly fate restricted. Cranial neural crest cells have been less analyzed in this regard but the preponderance of evidence indicates that either the cranial neural crest cells are not fate-restricted or are extremely plastic in their developmental capability and that specification does not control pathfinding. Thus, the guidance mechanisms that control cranial neural crest migration and their behavior vary significantly from the trunk.The vagal neural crest arises at the axial level between the cranial and trunk neural crest and represents a transitional cell population between the head and trunk neural crest. We summarize new data to support this claim. In particular, we show that: (1) the vagal-level neural crest cells exhibit modest developmental bias; (2) there are differences in the migratory behavior between the anterior and the posterior vagal neural crest cells reminiscent of the cranial and the trunk neural crest, respectively and (3) the vagal neural crest cells take the dorsolateral pathway to the pharyngeal arches and the heart, but take the ventral pathway to the peripheral nervous system and the gut. However, these pathways are not rigidly specified because of prior fate restriction. Understanding the molecular, cellular and behavioral differences between these three populations of neural crest cells will be of enormous assistance when trying to understand the evolution of the neck.Key words: neural crest, morphogenesis, cell migration, chicken embryo, fate restriction, vagal neural crest, pathways     

Regional differences in neural crest morphogenesis

Neural crest cells are pluripotent cells that emerge from the neural epithelium, migrate extensively, and differentiate into numerous derivatives, including neurons, glial cells, pigment cells and connective tissue. Major questions concerning their morphogenesis include: 1) what establishes the pathways of migration and 2) what controls the final destination and differentiation of various neural crest subpopulations. These questions will be addressed in this review. Neural crest cells from the trunk level have been explored most extensively. Studies show that melanoblasts are specified shortly after they depart from the neural tube, and this specification directs their migration into the dorsolateral pathway. We also consider other reports that present strong evidence for ventrally migrating neural crest cells being similarly fate restricted. Cranial neural crest cells have been less analyzed in this regard but the preponderance of evidence indicates that either the cranial neural crest cells are not fate-restricted, or are extremely plastic in their developmental capability and that specification does not control pathfinding. Thus, the guidance mechanisms that control cranial neural crest migration and their behavior vary significantly from the trunk. The vagal neural crest arises at the axial level between the cranial and trunk neural crest and represents a transitional cell population between the head and trunk neural crest. We summarize new data to support this claim. In particular, we show that: 1) the vagal-level neural crest cells exhibit modest developmental bias; 2) there are differences in the migratory behavior between the anterior and the posterior vagal neural crest cells reminiscent of the cranial and the trunk neural crest, respectively; 3) the vagal neural crest cells take the dorsolateral pathway to the pharyngeal arches and the heart, but the ventral pathway to the peripheral nervous system and the gut. However, these pathways are not rigidly specified because of prior fate restriction. Understanding the molecular, cellular and behavioral differences between these three populations of neural crest cells will be of enormous assistance when trying to understand the evolution of the neck.     

Regulation of neural crest cell populations: occurrence, distribution and underlying mechanisms

Regulation is a significant developmental event because successful cell proliferation and migration are critical to shaping young embryos. Regulation -- the replacement of undifferentiated embryonic cells by other cells in response to signals received from the environment -- is distinct from wound healing and regeneration. Investigations on regulation of neural crest cells span all vertebrates and have revealed that regulative ability varies both among classes (even species), and spatially and temporally within individuals. In general, there is greatest regulation for cranial neural crest cells, less for trunk, and virtually none forcardiac. Regulation also appears to be more complete at early embryonic stages. Fate-mapping studies have demonstrated that large regions of neural crest cells must be removed to generate missing or morphologically reduced structures. Recent studies reveal that less extensive neural crest cell extirpations result in normal morphology of cartilaginous and neuronal elements in the head, and normal development of pigmentation in the trunk. Ablation of cardiac neural crest cells frequently generates abnormalities of the heart, great vessels and parasympathetic nerve innervation. Decreased cell death, increased division, change in fate and altered migration are possible cellular mechanisms of regulation. In mostcases, the specific mechanisms of regulation are unknown, but a major premise underlying regulation is that cell potential is greater than cell fate. This concept was born from studies which demonstrated that some cells were able to express alternative fates if transplanted to a new environment. Among the potential cellular mechanisms for regulation, cell migration has received the most attention. Following ablation of neural crest cells, replacement neural crest cells migrate into gaps, most frequently from anterior/posterior locations. Cells from surrounding epidermal and neural ectoderm may have limited regulative ability, while compensation by cells from the ventral neural tube has been demonstrated to an even lesser extent. Regulation by such non-crest cells would require their transformation into neural crest cells. The potential for regulation of neural crest by placodal cells supports a closer relationship between neural crest and placodal ectoderm than previously recognized. Decreased cell death has been discussed primarily with reference to (1) cranial ganglia that have dual contributions from neural crest and placodal cells and (2) programmed cell death in rhombomeres three and five. Increased cell division in response to neural crest ablation is likely more common than has been reported, but this mechanism is difficult to interpret without a 3-D context for viewing how patterns of division differ from normal. Lastly, changes in cell fate may be the driving factor in regulation of embryonic cells. It has been repeatedly demonstrated thatcell potential is greaterthan cell fate. Once reliable mechanisms for assessing cell potential are established, we may find that fates are commonly altered in response to environmental signals. Regulation is therefore significant both as a basic developmental mechanism and as a mechanism for evolutionary change. The more labile the fate of embryonic cells, the more potential there is for maintaining existing characters and for generating new ones. According to Ettensohn (1992, p. 50), further analysis of such systems might . With regard to the neural crest, studies on regulation of this vital population of cells provide insight to the origin of the neural crest, to embryonic repair, and to the source of many craniofacial malformations, heart and other embryonic defects. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)     

Embryonic requirements for ErbB signaling in neural crest development and adult pigment pattern formation

Vertebrate pigment cells are derived from neural crest cells and are a useful system for studying neural crest-derived traits during post-embryonic development. In zebrafish, neural crest-derived melanophores differentiate during embryogenesis to produce stripes in the early larva. Dramatic changes to the pigment pattern occur subsequently during the larva-to-adult transformation, or metamorphosis. At this time, embryonic melanophores are replaced by newly differentiating metamorphic melanophores that form the adult stripes. Mutants with normal embryonic/early larval pigment patterns but defective adult patterns identify factors required uniquely to establish, maintain or recruit the latent precursors to metamorphic melanophores. We show that one such mutant, picasso, lacks most metamorphic melanophores and results from mutations in the ErbB gene erbb3b, which encodes an EGFR-like receptor tyrosine kinase. To identify critical periods for ErbB activities, we treated fish with pharmacological ErbB inhibitors and also knocked down erbb3b by morpholino injection. These analyses reveal an embryonic critical period for ErbB signaling in promoting later pigment pattern metamorphosis, despite the normal patterning of embryonic/early larval melanophores. We further demonstrate a peak requirement during neural crest migration that correlates with early defects in neural crest pathfinding and peripheral ganglion formation. Finally, we show that erbb3b activities are both autonomous and non-autonomous to the metamorphic melanophore lineage. These data identify a very early, embryonic, requirement for erbb3b in the development of much later metamorphic melanophores, and suggest complex modes by which ErbB signals promote adult pigment pattern development.     

Explanted Fish Neural Tubes Give Rise to Differentiating Neural Crest Cells

Neural tubes were explanted from the trunk of various embryonic stages of three teleost fish, Xiphophorus maculatus (platyfish), X. helleri (swordtail), and Oryzias latipes (Japanese medaka) with the aim to obtain in vitro differentiating neural crest cells. Outgrowth of cells was observed immediately after attachment of the explants on dishes coated with fibronectin. The outgrowing cells stained with the HNK-1 monoclonal antibody indicating that they were neural crest cells. Maximum cell outgrowth was obtained from explants of stage 9 of Xiphophorus and 19 of medaka, i.e., from stages characteristic of maximal neural crest cell segregation, and by the use of Leibovitz's (L-15) medium supplemented with 20% FBS. In this medium cells survived for more than two weeks; M199 also gave satisfactory results but DMEM allowed only poor cell growth and survival. Neuronal cells could be observed in all cultures after 48 hr, in some medaka cultures these cells were mixed with pigment cells but homogeneous pigment cell cultures were also observed. This in vitro system will be invaluable for the study of the developmental potential of fish neural crest cells and the contributions of extrinsic factors in neural crest cell fate.     

Corneal keratocytes retain neural crest progenitor cell properties

Corneal keratocytes have a remarkable ability to heal the cornea throughout life. Given their developmental origin from the cranial neural crest, we asked whether this regenerative ability was related to the stem cell-like properties of their neural crest precursors. To this end, we challenged corneal stromal keratocytes by injecting them into a new environment along cranial neural crest migratory pathways. The results show that injected stromal keratocytes change their phenotype, proliferate and migrate ventrally adjacent to host neural crest cells. They then contribute to the corneal endothelial and stromal layers, the musculature of the eye, mandibular process, blood vessels and cardiac cushion tissue of the host. However, they fail to form neurons in cranial ganglia or branchial arch cartilage, illustrating that they are at least partially restricted progenitors rather than stem cells. The data show that, even at late embryonic stages, corneal keratocytes are not terminally differentiated, but maintain plasticity and multipotentiality, contributing to non-neuronal cranial neural crest derivatives.     

Developmentally regulated lectin in dark versus white axolotl embryos

The white mutant of the Mexican axolotl, A. mexicanum, involves an ectodermal defect which prevents melanophore colonization. Endogenous lectins have been suggested to function in neural crest-derived melanophore adhesion in other animals. To determine if differences in endogenous lectins exist in dark and white axolotls during melanophore colonization, white and dark ectoderm and carcass tissues have been assayed for lectin activity at premigratory, early migratory, and late migratory neural crest stages. Lectin content (specific for D-glucosamine, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and D-mannose) increases significantly during early migration only in dark ectoderm and white carcass tissues, whereas white ectoderm and dark carcass lectin activities remain close to premigration levels. Neural crest cells in these embryos are associated with regions of high lectin activity suggesting that the differences in endogenous lectins may be involved in establishment of the dark/white phenotype.     

Effects of local tissue environment on the differentiation of neural crest cells in turtle, with special reference to understanding the spatial distribution of pigment cells

The spatial distribution of neural crest-derived pigment cells in turtles differs markedly from those found in chickens and mice. One hypothesis to explain such differences in the spatial distribution of pigment cells is that local tissue factors interact with neural crest cells, thereby determining their differentiation into pigment-synthesizing cells. It is reported here that local tissue factors in the soft-shell turtle (Trionyx sinensis japonicus) play a critical role in the development of melanophores from neural crest cells during embryogenesis. Undifferentiated neural crest cells derived from trunk neural tubes were co-cultured in vitro with homochronous somites, or with heterochronous dermis, lung or liver for 14 days. Melanophore differentiation from neural crest cells was significantly promoted when co-cultured with cells from lung, somites or dermis, but not when co-cultured with liver cells. These results suggest that local tissue factors stimulate the differentiation of pluripotent neural crest derivatives toward pigment cells. It is proposed that specific environmental cues play an important role in the spatial distribution of pigment cells in a variety of vertebrate species.     

Promotion of chromatophore differentiation in isolated premigratory neural crest cells by extracellular matrix material explanted on microcarriers

This study was undertaken to determine whether premigratory neural crest cells of the axolotl embryo differentiate autonomously into chromatophores, or whether stimuli from the environment, particularly from the extracellular matrix, are required for this process. Neural crest cells were excised from the dorsal part of the premigratory crest cord and cultured alone, either in a serum-free salt solution or in the presence of fetal calf serum (FCS), and together with explants of the neural tube or dorsal epidermis. A "microcarrier" technique was developed to assay the possible effects of subepidermal extracellular matrix (ECM) on chromatophore differentiation. ECM was adsorbed in vivo onto microcarriers prepared from Nuclepore filters, by inserting such carriers under the dorsolateral epidermis in the embryonic trunk. Neural crest cells were then cultured on the substrate of ECM deposited on the carriers. Melanophores were detected by DOPA incubation, revealing phenol oxidase activity, or by externally visible accumulation of melanin. Prospective xanthophores were visualized before they became overtly differentiated by alkali-induced pteridine fluorescence. Isolated premigratory neural crest cells did not transform autonomously into any of these phenotypes. Conversely, coculture with the neural tube or the dorsal epidermis, and also the initial presence or later addition of FCS during incubation, resulted in differentiation of neural crest cells into chromatophores. Both chromatophore phenotypes were also expressed on the ECM substrate deposited on the microcarriers. The results indicate that neural crest cells do not differentiate autonomously into melanophores and xanthophores, but that interactions with components of, or factors associated with the extra cellular matrix surrounding the premigratory neural crest and present along the dorsolateral migratory pathway are crucial for the expression of these chromatophore phenotypes in the embryo.