Neuropeptide Y and its receptor subtypes specifically modulate rat peritoneal macrophage functions in vitro: counter regulation through Y1 and Y2/5 receptors

It is well documented that neuropeptide Y (NPY) exerts a wide range of biological functions through at least five NPY Y receptor subtypes (Y1-Y5), but its immunological effects only recently came into focus. Using NPY family peptides and NPY-related receptor-specific peptides as well as Y1 and Y2 receptor antagonists, we have tested which NPY Y receptors are involved in NPY-induced modulation of rat peritoneal macrophage function in vitro. NPY and PYY increased oxidative burst in phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-stimulated macrophages involving activation of protein kinase C (PKC), and decreased it in zymosan-stimulated cells resembling inhibition of signaling pathways subsequent to binding of zymosan particles for the iC3b fragment receptor on macrophages. The combined treatment with NPY and NPY Y receptor antagonists revealed that NPY-induced potentiation of oxidative burst in PMA-stimulated cells is mediated through Y1 and Y2 receptors, while NPY-induced suppression in zymosan-stimulated cells is mediated through Y2 receptors only. NPY-related peptides differently modulated macrophage function, confirming involvement of NPY Y2 receptor in both potentiation and suppression of oxidative burst in these cells. Additionally, it was shown that NPY Y5 receptor mediated suppression of oxidative burst in PMA- and zymosan-stimulated macrophages. Taken together, the present data reveal an NPY Y1 and Y2/Y5 receptor interaction in NPY-induced modulation of macrophage functions related to inflammation.     

Differential regulation of neuropeptide Y receptors in the brains of NPY knock-out mice

To study the effect of NPY deletion on the regulation of its receptors in the NPY knockout (NPY KO) mice, the expression and binding of NPY receptors were investigated by in situ hybridization and receptor autoradiography using (125)I-[Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY and (125)I-PYY(3-36) as radioligands. A 6-fold increase in Y2 receptor mRNA was observed in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in NPY KO mice, but a significant change could not be detected for Y1, Y4, Y5 and y6 receptors. Receptor binding reveals a 60-400% increase of Y2 receptor binding in multiple brain areas. A similar increase in Y1 receptor binding was seen only in the hypothalamus. These results demonstrate the NPY receptor expression is altered in mice deficient for its natural ligand.     

Food intake regulation in rodents: Y5 or Y1 NPY receptors or both?

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), one of the most abundant peptides in rat and human brains, appears to act in the hypothalamus to stimulate feeding. It was first suggested that the NPY Y1 receptor (Y1R) was involved in feeding stimulated by NPY. More recently a novel NPY receptor subtype (Y5R) was identified in rat and human as the NPY feeding receptor subtype. There is, however, no absolute consensus since selective Y1R antagonists also antagonize NPY-induced hyperphagia. Nevertheless, new anti-obesity drugs may emerge from further pharmacological characterization of the NPY receptors and their antagonists. A large panel of Y1R and Y5R antagonists (such as CGP71683A, BIBO3304, BIBP3226, 1229U91, and SYNAPTIC and BANYU derivatives but also patentable in-house-synthesized compounds) have been evaluated through in vitro and in vivo tests in an attempt to establish a predictive relationship between the binding selectivity for human receptors, the potency in isolated organs assays, and the inhibitory effect on food intake in both normal and obese hyperphagic rodents. Although these results do not allow one to conclude on the implication of a single receptor subtype at the molecular level, this approach is crucial for the design of novel NPY receptor antagonists with potential use as anti-obesity drugs and for evaluation of their possible adverse peripheral side effects, such as hypotension.     

Evidence of NPY Y5 receptor involvement in food intake elicited by orexin A in sated rats

Intracerebroventricular (icv) injections of orexin A stimulate feeding in sated rats. Since neuropeptide Y is a potent orexigenic peptide and orexin-containing neurons are morphologically linked with NPY-producing neurons in the hypothalamus, we evaluated the functional relationship between the two orexigenic peptides. The results show that whereas it was ineffective on its own, a selective NPY Y5 receptor antagonist, injected icv 15 min. before orexin A significantly suppressed orexin A-induced feeding. Since previous investigations demonstrated that an NPY Y1 receptor antagonist also inhibits feeding induced by orexin A, the current results further underscore the existence of a functional link between orexin and NPY producing neurons as the orexin network appears to be capable of influencing NPYergic signaling through Y1 and Y5 receptors to stimulate feeding.     

Cardiorespiratory responses to intracerebroventricular injection of neuropeptide Y in anaesthetised dogs.

Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and separate, preferential agonists for NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors were observed in anaesthetised dogs. Central injections of NPY resulted in significant cardiac slowing and decreases in arterial pressure. These cardiovascular effects were blocked by central injection of the NPY Y1- preferring antagonist 1229U91. Central injection of NPY did not have a significant effect on ventilation, but the NPY Y1 antagonist 1229U91 administered alone caused a significant increase in ventilation. The NPY Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34] NPY significantly decreased ventilation while the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl [Leu28Leu31] NPY 24--36 significantly increased it. A similar inverse relationship was seen with respect to blood pressure, with the NPY Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34] NPY significantly decreasing blood pressure, while the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl [Leu28Leu31] NPY 24-36 significantly increased it. These findings suggest a role for NPY Y1 receptors in pathways mediating decreases in ventilation and blood pressure, and for NPY Y2 receptors in those mediating increased ventilation and blood pressure.     

Modeling of neuropeptide receptors Y1, Y4, Y5, and docking studies with neuropeptide antagonist

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. NPY mediates several physiological responses, such as blood pressure, food intake, sedation. These actions of NPY are mediated by six receptor subtypes denoted as Y1-Y5 and y6. Modeling of receptor subtypes and binding site identification is an important step in developing new therapeutic agents. We have attempted to model the three NPY receptor types, Y1, Y4, and Y5 using homology modeling and threading methods. The models are consistent with previously reported experimental evidence. To understand the interaction and selectivity of NPY analogues with different neuropeptide receptors, docking studies of two neuropeptide analogues (BVD10 and BVD15) with receptors Y1 and Y4 were carried out. Results of the docking studies indicated that the interaction of ligands BVD10 and BVD15 with Y1 and Y4 receptors are different. These results were evaluated for selectivity of peptide analogues BVD10 and BVD15 towards the receptors.     

Novel role of Y1 receptors in the coordinated regulation of bone and energy homeostasis

The importance of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and Y2 receptors in the regulation of bone and energy homeostasis has recently been demonstrated. However, the contributions of the other Y receptors are less clear. Here we show that Y1 receptors are expressed on osteoblastic cells. Moreover, bone and adipose tissue mass are elevated in Y1(-/-) mice with a generalized increase in bone formation on cortical and cancellous surfaces. Importantly, the inhibitory effects of NPY on bone marrow stromal cells in vitro are absent in cells derived from Y1(-/-) mice, indicating a direct action of NPY on bone cells via this Y receptor. Interestingly, in contrast to Y2 receptor or germ line Y1 receptor deletion, conditional deletion of hypothalamic Y1 receptors in adult mice did not alter bone homeostasis, food intake, or adiposity. Furthermore, deletion of both Y1 and Y2 receptors did not produce additive effects in bone or adiposity. Thus Y1 receptor pathways act powerfully to inhibit bone production and adiposity by nonhypothalamic pathways, with potentially direct effects on bone tissue through a single pathway with Y2 receptors.     

Up-regulation of neuropeptide Y levels and modulation of glutamate release through neuropeptide Y receptors in the hippocampus of kainate-induced epileptic rats

Kainate-induced epilepsy has been shown to be associated with increased levels of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the rat hippocampus. However, there is no information on how increased levels of this peptide might modulate excitation in kainate-induced epilepsy. In this work, we investigated the modulation of glutamate release by NPY receptors in hippocampal synaptosomes isolated from epileptic rats. In the acute phase of epilepsy, a transient decrease in the efficiency of NPY and selective NPY receptor agonists in inhibiting glutamate release was observed. Moreover, in the chronic epileptic hippocampus, a decrease in the efficiency of NPY and the Y(2) receptor agonist, NPY13-36, was also found. Simultaneously, we observed that the epileptic hippocampus expresses higher levels of NPY, which may account for an increased basal inhibition of glutamate release. Consistently, the blockade of Y(2) receptors increased KCl-evoked glutamate release, and there was an increase in Y(2) receptor mRNA levels 30 days after kainic acid injection, suggesting a basal effect of NPY through Y(2) receptors. Taken together, these results indicate that an increased function of the NPY modulatory system in the epileptic hippocampus may contribute to basal inhibition of glutamate release and control hyperexcitability.     

Self-regulation of agonist activity at the Y receptors

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant neuropeptides, and is likely to be present at nanomolar levels over extended periods in the synaptic space of many forebrain areas. This might be linked to an evolved generalized toning activity through a number of other peptide receptors that use C-terminally amidated agonists (with LHRH and orexin receptors and GIR as examples). However, the Y1 and Y2 receptors (which constitute the bulk of Y receptors active in the neural matrix) possess subnanomolar affinities that, at saturating NPY levels, could produce excessive signaling, as well as receptor losses via repeated endocytosis. The related Y4 receptor shows an even higher agonist affinity, and faces the same problem in visceral and neural locations accessible to pancreatic polypeptide (PP). An examination of agonist peptide interaction with Y receptors shows that Y1 and Y4 receptors in particular (as located on either the intact cells, or on particulates derived from various cell types) develop a blockade dependent on ligand concentration, with the blocking ranks of [NPY]>[peptide YY] (PYY) for the Y1, and [human PP]>[PYY-related Y4 agonist] for the Y4 receptor. This blockade is also echoed in a concentration-related reduction in biological activity of primary agonists (NPY and PP), resembling a partial agonism, and is influenced especially by the allosteric interactivity of agonists. With the Y2 receptor, the blocking by agonists is less pronounced, but the signaling by NPY-related peptides is apparently less than with PYY-related agonists. The extended occupancy and self-attenuation of primary agonist activity at Y receptors could represent an evolutionary solution contributing to a balancing of metabolic signaling, agonist clearance and receptor conservation.     

Existence of both neuropeptide Y, Y1 and Y2 receptors in pig spleen: evidence using subtype-selective antagonists in vivo

The effects of the first selective, non-peptide, NPY Y2 receptor antagonist (S)-N2-[[1-[2-[4-[(R,S)-5,11-dihydro-6(6h)-oxodibenz[b,e]azepin-11-yl]-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethyl]cyclopentyl]acetyl]-N-[2-[1,2-dihydro-3,5 (4H)-dioxo-1,2-diphenyl-3H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl]ethyl]-argininamid (BIIE0246) were studied on splenic vascular responses evoked in the pig in vivo. BIIE0246 abolished the splenic vasoconstrictor response to the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl[Leu25Leu31]NPY(24-36), but did not affect the response to the NPY Y1 receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34]NPY, which in turn was abolished by the selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist (2R)-5-([amino(imino)methyl]amino)-2-[(2,2-diphenylacetyl)amino]-N-[(IR)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-pentanamide (H 409/22). Furthermore, the PYY-evoked splenic vasoconstrictor response was partially antagonized by BIIE0246 and subsequently almost abolished by the addition of H 409/22. It is concluded that BIIE0246 exerts selective (vs the NPY Y1 receptor) NPY Y2 receptor antagonism, and thus represents an interesting tool for classification of NPY receptors, in vivo. In addition, evidence for NPY Y2 receptor mediated vasoconstriction was presented. Furthermore, both NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors are involved in the splenic vasoconstrictor response to PYY.     

Increased brain neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptor binding in NPY knock out mice does not result in increased receptor function

The brain neuropeptide Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is an important modulator of a number of centrally mediated processes including feeding, anxiety-like behaviors, blood pressure and others. NPY produces its effects through at least four functional G-protein coupled receptors termed Y1, Y2, Y4 and Y5. In the brain, the Y1 and Y2 receptor subtypes are the predominant receptor population. To better understand the roles of NPY, genetically modified mice lacking NPY were produced but lacked the expected phenotypes. These mice have previously been reported to have a marked increase in Y2 receptor binding. In the present study, we found an upregulation of both Y1 and Y2 receptor binding and extended these findings to the female. These increases were as large as 10-fold or greater in many brain regions. To assess functional coupling of the receptors, we performed agonist-induced [(35)S]GTPgammaS autoradiography. In the mouse brain, the Y1/Y4/Y5 agonist Leu(31),Pro(34)-NPY increased [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding with a regional distribution consistent with that produced when labeling adjacent sections with [(125)I]-Leu(31),Pro(34)-PYY. In a few brain regions, minor increases were noted in the agonist-induced binding when comparing knock out mice to wild type. The Y2 agonist C2-NPY stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in numerous brain areas with a regional distribution similar to the binding observed with [(125)I]-PYY3-36. Again, no major increases were noted in the functional activation of Y2 receptors between knock out and wild type mice. Therefore, the increased Y1 and Y2 binding observed in the NPY knock out mice does not represent an increase in NPY receptor mediated signaling and is likely due to an increase in spare (uncoupled) receptors.     

Neuropeptide Y modulation of interleukin-1{beta} (IL-1{beta})-induced nitric oxide production in microglia

Given the modulatory role of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the immune system, we investigated the effect of NPY on the production of NO and IL-1β in microglia. Upon LPS stimulation, NPY treatment inhibited NO production as well as the expression of inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS). Pharmacological studies with a selective Y(1) receptor agonist and selective antagonists for Y(1), Y(2), and Y(5) receptors demonstrated that inhibition of NO production and iNOS expression was mediated exclusively through Y(1) receptor activation. Microglial cells stimulated with LPS and ATP responded with a massive release of IL-1β, as measured by ELISA. NPY inhibited this effect, suggesting that it can strongly impair the release of IL-1β. Furthermore, we observed that IL-1β stimulation induced NO production and that the use of a selective IL-1 receptor antagonist prevented NO production upon LPS stimulation. Moreover, NPY acting through Y(1) receptor inhibited LPS-stimulated release of IL-1β, inhibiting NO synthesis. IL-1β activation of NF-κB was inhibited by NPY treatment, as observed by confocal microscopy and Western blotting analysis of nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 subunit, leading to the decrease of NO synthesis. Our results showed that upon LPS challenge, microglial cells release IL-1β, promoting the production of NO through a NF-κB-dependent pathway. Also, NPY was able to strongly inhibit NO synthesis through Y(1) receptor activation, which prevents IL-1β release and thus inhibits nuclear translocation of NF-κB. The role of NPY in key inflammatory events may contribute to unravel novel gateways to modulate inflammation associated with brain pathology.     

Modeling of Neuropeptide Receptors Y1, Y4, Y5, and Docking Studies with Neuropeptide Antagonist Analogues: Implications for Selectivity

Abstract Neuropeptide Y (NPY), receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. NPY mediates several physiological responses, such as blood pressure, food intake, sedation. These actions of NPY are mediated by six receptor subtypes denoted as Y(1)-Y(5) and y(6). Modeling of receptor subtypes and binding site identification is an important step in developing new therapeutic agents. We have attempted to model the three NPY receptor types, Y1, Y4, and Y5 using homology modeling and threading methods. The models are consistent with previously reported experimental evidence. To understand the interaction and selectivity of NPY analogues with different neuropeptide receptors, docking studies of two neuropeptide analogues (BVD10 and BVD15) with receptors Y1 and Y4 were carried out. Results of the docking studies indicated that the interaction of ligands BVD10 and BVD15 with Y1 and Y4 receptors are different. These results were evaluated for selectivity of peptide analogues BVD10 and BVD15 towards the receptors.     

A Y2 receptor mimetic aptamer directed against neuropeptide Y.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36-amino acid neuropeptide that exerts its activity by at least five different receptor subtypes that belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors. We isolated an aptamer directed against NPY from a nuclease-resistant RNA library. Mapping experiments with N-terminally, C-terminally, and centrally truncated analogues of NPY revealed that the aptamer recognizes the C terminus of NPY. Individual replacement of the four arginine residues at positions 19, 25, 33, and 35 by l-alanine showed that arginine 33 is essential for binding. The aptamer does not recognize pancreatic polypeptide, a highly homologous Y4 receptor-specific peptide of the gut. Furthermore, the affinity of the aptamer to the Y5 receptor-selective agonist [Ala(31),Aib(32)]NPY and the Y1/Y5 receptor-binding peptide [Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY was considerably reduced, whereas Y2 receptor-specific NPY mutants were bound well by the aptamer. Accordingly, the NPY epitope was recognized by the Y2 receptor, and the aptamer was highly similar. This Y2 receptor mimicking effect was further confirmed by competition binding studies. Whereas the aptamer competed with the Y2 receptor for binding of [(3)H]NPY with high affinity, a low affinity displacement of [(3)H]NPY was observed at the Y1 and the Y5 receptors. Consequently, competition at the Y2 receptor occurred with a considerably lower K(i) value compared with the Y1 and Y5 receptors. These results indicate that the aptamer mimics the binding of NPY to the Y2 receptor more closely than to the Y1 and Y5 receptors.     

NPY receptor subtype specification for behavioral adaptive strategies during limited food access

The neuropeptide Y (NPY) system in the brain regulates a wide variety of behavioral, metabolic and hormonal homeostatic processes required for energy balance control. During times of limited food availability, NPY promotes behavioral hyperactivity necessary to explore and prepare for novel food resources. As NPY can act via 5 different receptor subtypes, we investigated the path through which NPY affects different behavioral components relevant for adaptation to such conditions. We tested NPY Y1 and Y2 receptor knockout mice and their wild-type littermate controls in a daily scheduled limited food access paradigm with unlimited access to running wheel. Here we show that NPY Y1 receptor deficient mice lack the expression of appetitive behavior and that NPY Y2 receptors control the level of hyperactive behavior under these conditions. Thus, receptor specificity determines the differential expression of NPY-mediated behavioral adaptations to overcome a negative energy status.     

Rapid internalization and recycling of the human neuropeptide Y Y(1) receptor.

Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves receptor phosphorylation and reduction in the number of receptors at the cell surface. The neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(1) receptor undergoes fast desensitization. We examined agonist-induced signaling and internalization using NPY Y(1) receptors fused to green fluorescent protein (EGFP). When expressed in HEK293 cells, EGFP-hNPY Y(1) receptors were localized at the plasma membrane, desensitized rapidly as assessed using calcium responses, and had similar properties compared to hNPY Y(1) receptors. Upon agonist challenge, the EGFP signal decreased rapidly (t(1/2) = 107 +/- 3 s) followed by a slow recovery. This decrease was blocked by BIBP3226, a Y(1) receptor antagonist, or by pertussis toxin, in agreement with Y(1) receptor activation. Internalization of EGFP-hNPY Y(1) receptors to acidic endosomal compartments likely accounts for the decrease in the EGFP signal, being absent after pretreatment with monensin. Concanavalin A and hypertonic sucrose, which inhibit clathrin-mediated endocytosis, blocked the decrease in fluorescence. After agonist, intracellular EGFP signals were punctate and co-localized with transferrin-Texas Red, a marker of clathrin-associated internalization and recycling, but not with LysoTracker Red, a lysosomal pathway marker, supporting receptor trafficking to recycling endosomes rather than the late endosomal/lysosomal pathway. Pulse-chase experiments revealed no receptor degradation after internalization. The slow recovery of fluorescence was unaffected by cycloheximide or actinomycin D, indicating that de novo synthesis of receptors was not limiting. Use of a multicompartment model to fit our fluorescence data allows simultaneous determination of internalization and recycling rate constants. We propose that rapid internalization of receptors via the clathrin-coated pits recycling pathway may largely account for the rapid desensitization of NPY Y(1) receptors.     

NPY, NPY receptors, and DPP IV activity are modulated by LPS, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma in HUVEC

Since NPY increases endothelial cell (EC) stickiness for leukocytes, we studied the effects of LPS, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma on its expression and action in HUVEC. Cytokines raised NPY and pro-NPY intracellular content and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) activity. Y1 and Y2 receptors were expressed in basal conditions, and LPS, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma induced Y5 receptor expression with a concomitant extinction of Y2 receptor expression. NPY induced an intracellular calcium increase mainly mediated by Y2 and Y5 receptors in basal conditions. After stimulation with LPS, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma, calcium increase was mainly caused by Y5 receptor. The modulation of the NPY system by LPS, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma, and the NPY-induced calcium signaling suggest a role for NPY during the inflammatory response.     

Feeding after fourth ventricular administration of neuropeptide Y receptor agonists in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) stimulate food intake after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle, suggesting that NPY receptors in the hindbrain are targets for the stimulatory effect of these peptides on food intake. However, the NPY/PYY receptor subtype mediating the feeding response in the hindbrain is not known. To approach to this question we compared dose-effect of several NPY receptor agonists to stimulate food intake in freely-feeding rats 60- and 120-min after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle. At the 120-min time point, PYY was 2- to 10-times as potent as NPY over the dose-response range and stimulated twice the total intake at the maximally effective dose (2-fold greater efficacy). NPY was 2-times as potent as the Y1, Y5 receptor agonist, [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY but acted with comparable efficacy. The Y5-, Y2-differentiating receptor agonist, NPY 2-36, was comparable in potency to PYY at low doses but equal in efficacy NPY and [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY. The Y2 receptor agonist, NPY 13-36, produced only a marginal effect on total food intake. The profile of agonist potency after fourth cerebral ventricle administration is similar to the profile obtained when these or related agonists are injected in the region of the hypothalamus. Agonists at both Y1 and Y5 receptors stimulated food intake with a rank order of potency that does not conclusively favor the exclusive involvement of a single known NPY receptor subtype. Thus it is possible that the ingestive effects of NPY and PYY are mediated by multiple or novel receptor subtypes in the hindbrain. And the relatively greater potency and efficacy of PYY raises the possibility that a novel PYY-preferring receptor in the hindbrain is involved in the stimulation of food intake.     

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, combined with bimolecular fluorescence complementation, reveals the effects of β-arrestin complexes and endocytic targeting on the membrane mobility of neuropeptide Y receptors

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and photon counting histogram (PCH) analysis are powerful ways to study mobility and stoichiometry of G protein coupled receptor complexes, within microdomains of single living cells. However, relating these properties to molecular mechanisms can be challenging. We investigated the influence of β-arrestin adaptors and endocytosis mechanisms on plasma membrane diffusion and particle brightness of GFP-tagged neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors. A novel GFP-based bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) system also identified Y1 receptor-β-arrestin complexes. Diffusion co-efficients (D) for Y1 and Y2-GFP receptors in HEK293 cell plasma membranes were 2.22 and 2.15 × 10(-9)cm(2)s(-1) respectively. At a concentration which promoted only Y1 receptor endocytosis, NPY treatment reduced Y1-GFP motility (D 1.48 × 10(-9)cm(2)s(-1)), but did not alter diffusion characteristics of the Y2-GFP receptor. Agonist induced changes in Y1 receptor motility were inhibited by mutations (6A) which prevented β-arrestin recruitment and internalisation; conversely they became apparent in a Y2 receptor mutant with increased β-arrestin affinity. NPY treatment also increased Y1 receptor-GFP particle brightness, changes which indicated receptor clustering, and which were abolished by the 6A mutation. The importance of β-arrestin recruitment for these effects was illustrated by reduced lateral mobility (D 1.20-1.33 × 10(-9)cm(2)s(-1)) of Y1 receptor-β-arrestin BiFC complexes. Thus NPY-induced changes in Y receptor motility and brightness reflect early events surrounding arrestin dependent endocytosis at the plasma membrane, results supported by a novel combined BiFC/FCS approach to detect the underlying receptor-β-arrestin signalling complex.